Author Topic: Double standards  (Read 9702 times)

mountainspring

  • Guest
Re: Double standards
« Reply #45 on: July 22, 2006, 09:06:15 PM »
I'm sorry you're feeling sad Moon.  Hope you are feeling better soon. 

(((Moon)))

Stormchild

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1183
  • It's about becoming real.
    • Gale Warnings
Re: Double standards
« Reply #46 on: July 22, 2006, 09:26:56 PM »
Hi Moon,

Love is a verb. It's not a place, it's not just a feeling. It's a doing.

To love yourself means to see things as they really are, and deal with them as best you can, because otherwise you're not telling yourself the truth, and there's nothing loving about telling lies to anyone - not even to one's self.

Sometimes people have to look at things that aren't very nice, because sometimes, sadly, that's just the way things are. Hiding it or hiding from it just prolongs the problem.

Would you really be better off if you were still trying to get your father to love you? I know you know the answer to that. Admitting he's incapable of love was painful, but aren't you in less pain now - from him - than you ever were before? I know you know the answer to that too.

Sorry you have a loved one who is unwell. And to come here and find us all up to our knees in mess has to be a downer too. Hang in there. We will all get through this. We may not come out all holding hands and singing, but we will get through it.

((((((((((Moon))))))))))

((((((((((Mountainspring))))))))))
The only way out is through, and the only way to win is not to play.

"... truth is all I can stand to live with." -- Moonlight52

http://galewarnings.blogspot.com

http://strangemercy.blogspot.com

http://potemkinsoffice.blogspot.com

Certain Hope

  • Guest
Re: Double standards
« Reply #47 on: July 22, 2006, 09:46:17 PM »
I ditto what Storm just said, including the hugs all around. Stormy, I think you have amazing patience.

For the record, I did not think that what I posted here was "labeling" anyone. All of the labeling I've seen here on this thread has come from Sela. That's just a matter of fact in my book. Also for the record, I think it's good and wise and healthy to be up front and above board about these sorts of things, not underhanded and fake. Faithful are the wounds of a friend, but the kisses of an enemy are downright deceitful.  What I originally expressed has been so twisted out of shape, taken out of context, and distorted by Sela that it's barely recognizable. That's where the labelling and character assassination are coming from, not from me.

Portia, I did not intend to be "mean" or to hurt you. I am sorry if you are feeling damaging pain because of anything I said.  I hope that any pain we all might experience through this will be growing pains, positive and healthy. Nothing I expressed was done with the spin that Sela tried to put on it, but I am definitely aware of how one person's distorted view can discolor and taint an entire picture. I am sorry, Portia, that you became the focus of all this and I wish only the very best for you. Read the entire thread, don't read the entire thread, however it seems best for you. Get to it when you want to or not at all, as far as I'm concerned it's run its course. Even now, I can see my sentences pasted in a reply with a sarcastic comment following. Not by you, Portia. But it's simply not worth it. I truly am sorry for my ignorance and lack of social skills. I feel like RM now... I am not a racist. I am not a meanie. This is such a farse.

RM... I'm glad you posted here. You reminded me of the bigger picture, which I lost sight of in the quicksand of all these words. If this whole deal doesn't wind up bringing glory to God, then it's not only an utter waste of time, it's wrong. I got so busy defending my principles, I forgot Who I'm supposed to represent.

Hope

Certain Hope

  • Guest
Re: Double standards
« Reply #48 on: July 22, 2006, 09:51:10 PM »
Portia, didn't want to edit and leave room for doubt re: any changes I'd made to my last post, so here I am again... 

I said,   "I am sorry, Portia, that you became the focus of all this and I wish only the very best for you."

I want to change that because it sounds like you got here by accident. I take full responsibility for that part of it, So:  I am sorry that I put you into this position of being the focus of all this. And I most definitely do wish only the very best for you.

Hope

reallyME

  • Guest
Re: Double standards
« Reply #49 on: July 23, 2006, 12:08:28 AM »
Aw CH, thank you for sayin that.  How sweet of you. Blessya

portia guest

  • Guest
Re: Double standards
« Reply #50 on: July 23, 2006, 10:31:23 AM »
Certain Hope, I will paste your words here, the better for me to reply to you and sconsdier your words aas I type, I hope that way of posting is okay with you, if not, you can tell me of course. Just one post right now - and a big doggy smile to Hops whose post I read (is it here? i think so) and which made me grin from ear to ear, I liked it Hops, thank you! - anyway where was I:

Portia, I did not intend to be "mean" or to hurt you. I am sorry if you are feeling damaging pain because of anything I said.  I hope that any pain we all might experience through this will be growing pains, positive and healthy.

I still haven't read pages 1 and 2 BUT I know you were respoding to what I said to Storm. What I said to Storm was meant for Storm and the words I used and the tone I used were particularly intended for Storm - and not for anyone else. Why do I say that? Becasue your reaction, i think, is about how I react to Storm. Well, how I react to Storm is about me, and her. It's not about how I react to you. Do I react to everyone like that? i don't think so.

I think I love this question most of all the questions I can think of: "why?"
In any situation, in any sense, the word 'why' gets us going deeper, looking foir understanding.

So don't worry about what you've said back there. I don't feel at all damaged or hurt by anything you've said before and I doubt very much i will now, because I'm getting more information about you, the type of person you are. What does that mean? I mean, the people who hurt me are those people who are in terrible pain, who suffer so damn much that they lash out, that their pain causes them to erect fantastic and awful defences, defences that prove the depth of their pain. Other people's pain is the most hurtful thing in the world to me. I have no doubt that you too hurt and have your life pains Certain Hope, but I sense, from seeing you here, that those pains do not stop you from trying to solve them: you have hope in your name and that is telling. please know that you have not pained me.

Nothing I expressed was done with the spin that Sela tried to put on it,

I will support Sela here, who I've known a long time. Sela has driven me to distraction with questioning, with bevaviour modification type advice and I thank her from the bottom of my heart. She has changed my view on many things - behaviour stuff in particular (rework those bad tapes by postive affirmations for example). Sela can seem like she will take you apart: BUT I believe her intention is helpful and never harmful. I needed some things taking apart and she helped me find other parts to put back together. What bad writing but I hope you get the idea. It hurts, for sure, it hurts but only because when we face ourselves, we acknowledge all the human frailty we hold, all the bad sloppy thinking and we embrace the fears and look them square in the face: we face them down and own them. So, Sela, yes. It might feel like 'spin' CH, but it's not, it depends on your interpretation. Maybe that would be a more productive line for me to take - to look at your exchnages with Sela and see what I see, try to be objective, ask for other opinions? All out in the open - no PMs (PMs restrict feedback and other views). Maybe I'll do that.

Why? Because I sense something worth doing. The worse thing is when it seems that the problem is unsolvable and some problems are. That hurts like hell. That is like personal failure to me, the inability to connect, the lack of standard homo sapien response. Whoah. enough. It hurts.

I am sorry, Portia, that you became the focus of all this and I wish only the very best for you.

I understand your words above and of course, it's just simple cause and effect. I posted, you posted, Sela posted etc. Relationships and interpretations and assumptions and the necessary stuff of human communication. It's all okay! It's all allowed. Nobody is at fault - nobody.

I truly am sorry for my ignorance and lack of social skills.

I would never describe you as ignorant or lacking in social skills, no way. You seem like a rounded human being to me, not perfect, not imperfect either, but absolutely human. This board is an odd - understatement - environment. I think it is improved and helped by your presence. Hang in there. It's worth it I believe and I value you being here. take care, I'm going for now.

Certain Hope

  • Guest
Re: Double standards
« Reply #51 on: July 23, 2006, 11:18:04 AM »
Portia,

Thank you for accepting my apology.

I'm glad that you don't feel hurt by anything I've said.

I understand your position re: Sela's involvement in this conflict and thank you for being so clear about that. You've inspired me to attempt to be equally clear. I will not be revisiting my exchanges with Sela. I will not contribute to any further discussion on that topic at all. This is a boundary I must draw for myself, because I don't know how to speak any more clearly than I already have, and yet my words were twisted, imo.

I am also not interested in assigning fault or blame here. My goal is to move on from this with the knowledge I've gained, free from fear, so that the next time I feel a need to address a conflict, I can do it directly, assertively, and productively without engaging in discussions with a third party.

I'm done with this, Portia. Thank you for your part in laying it to rest.

Hope

Portia

  • Guest
Re: Double standards
« Reply #52 on: July 23, 2006, 12:05:09 PM »
Certain Hope,

I forget to say thank you to you in my last reply. My last reply was written with some emotion so I apologise if that was apparent and also want to say thank you for replying. I used to be more careful with my posts - editing and rewording and so on - recently I've just tried to communicate an essence or something more direct, instead, and I'm not sure it's worked anywhere. Maybe I'll go back to being very careful with my words. Muttering out loud here.

I respect your boundary with Sela. I was simply being honest about my thoughts and feelings and experiences. It's okay with me for you to do as you choose and we can agree to disagree in our interpretations of Sela's intentions. No worries.

I feel I need to ask a question or two because I don't understand (and I like to understand, if possible). If you don't wish to answer that's okay. I'll ask anyway, no harm in asking I guess. About:

I am also not interested in assigning fault or blame here.

I read this and went 'oh!' in my head, 'who said you were'? Not me! When I said nobody is to blame, I meant it. I wasn't implying the opposite of what I said. I was being straightforward and honest. Did what I say cause you to think I was implying otherwise? If not no worries, but I wondered what you meant. I don't think any fault or blame is in question. It doesn't arise for me. I'm not that sort of person. I don't look for people to blame at any point: I usually just see a mess of misunderstanding. I don't 'get' blaming: it doesn't serve any useful purpose to me. We all have to live together, what's the point of 'blame'? Just telling you my thoughts there, what sort of person I am, inside. Just for the heck of it.

My goal is to move on from this with the knowledge I've gained, free from fear, so that the next time I feel a need to address a conflict, I can do it directly, assertively, and productively without engaging in discussions with a third party.

Sounds good. So, for example, if I upset you in any way, you'll ask me directly and not talk to others, is that how it would work? Going directly to the source, I'd agree with that. Not that you asked, I'm just asking/talking for my own interest here.

I'm done with this, Portia. Thank you for your part in laying it to rest.

Can I ask though, I appreciate you're done with 'this', does that mean I'm done with it too? I mean, do you want me to talk any more, or if I want to talk, can I, or would you rather I stop now? If you want me to stop, I will too, although it will leave a couple of question marks in my mind, but no problem there I think. Either way, or maybe a middle way, or whatever, you can let me know by replying or not, and I won't post any more questions or mutterings addressed to you unless you say otherwise. Can't think of a way of covering any other options, so I'll stop.





Certain Hope

  • Guest
Re: Double standards
« Reply #53 on: July 23, 2006, 12:29:34 PM »
Hi Portia,

You're welcome. And thank you again. I appreciate your way of completely alleviating the tension from this discussion between us. I also really appreciate your respect of my boundary with Sela. This feels healthy and mature to me.

No, I didn't think that you were implying the opposite of anything. When I said that I was not interested in assigning blame, I meant that I take responsibility for bringing about this confrontation. I have to, because to do otherwise I'd be subscribing to the "stuff happens" theory, which does not resonate as truth to me.

You said:  "So, for example, if I upset you in any way, you'll ask me directly and not talk to others, is that how it would work? Going directly to the source, I'd agree with that. Not that you asked, I'm just asking/talking for my own interest here."

Yes, Portia. That's what I'll do. That's what I should have done the first time, which is why I've taken responsibility for initiating confrontation in the wrong manner.

You said:  "Can I ask though, I appreciate you're done with 'this', does that mean I'm done with it too? I mean, do you want me to talk any more, or if I want to talk, can I, or would you rather I stop now? If you want me to stop, I will too, although it will leave a couple of question marks in my mind, but no problem there I think."

   I face a momentary dilemma with that question. Can I legitimately tell you that you should be "done" with an issue? No.
But based on the apology I extended and you received, I do believe that I can legitimately state that I am done with it.
To me, "done" means that I would prefer to not be called upon to respond further on this topic, on this thread. I believe that forgiveness offered and received should end a matter. I do not have the ability to further analyze the various issues involved in this whole thing beyond what I'm attempting to do on other threads, so I'll stop here, too.

Hope




portia guest

  • Guest
Re: Double standards
« Reply #54 on: July 23, 2006, 12:48:02 PM »
Thank you again Certain Hope. I appreciated your reply and the thoughtfulness of your response to my questions, I like that and feel…validated in attempting to communicate clearly – which for me often means saying much more, double clarifying and writing more words than might seem necessary. So thank you.

I would prefer to not be called upon to respond further on this topic, on this thread.

I respect your preference and in return I have no outstanding question marks that need answering. Thanks for taking the time; I must admit I was starting to feel ‘guilty’ for not answering the earlier pages, saying that I would and then delaying it, but maybe it’s for the best. And thanks for saying you’ll ask me directly if it happens again: please do, I hope you would, or will, if it happens. P

Brigid

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 793
Re: Double standards
« Reply #55 on: July 23, 2006, 09:02:51 PM »
Hope,
I just wanted to make a short reply to you here on your own thread regarding your comments to me yesterday.  I did not want you to think that I did not read them or have any regard for your thoughts.

I totally respect, understand and support your needing to respond to issues facing you with a strength and resolve that frees you from your past bonds of enabling and fear.  I have certainly felt that same need.  We are all on a path to healing that is personal and individual.  You must do what works for you, just as I have.  I see you as a very wise, thoughtful woman who knows what mistakes she has made in the past and how best to not repeat those mistakes in the future.

I send many blessings and best wishes as you move forward on your path.

Hugs,

Brigid

Bones

  • Guest
Re: Double standards
« Reply #56 on: July 24, 2006, 02:30:34 PM »
We're all a work in progress...progress, not perfection.

Bones

Certain Hope

  • Guest
Re: Double standards
« Reply #57 on: July 24, 2006, 02:32:44 PM »
Indeed, Bones.  ((((((((((Bones))))))))))

((((((((Brigid))))))))  again, just because.

Hope

Bones

  • Guest
Re: Double standards
« Reply #58 on: July 24, 2006, 02:42:31 PM »
Indeed, Bones.  ((((((((((Bones))))))))))

((((((((Brigid))))))))  again, just because.

Hope

Thanks, Hope!

((((((((((((((((((((((((Hope)))))))))))))))))))))))))