Author Topic: The Nature of Conflict  (Read 4083 times)

Stormchild

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1183
  • It's about becoming real.
    • Gale Warnings
The Nature of Conflict
« on: September 19, 2006, 10:35:16 PM »
Serendipity: finding valuable or agreeable things not sought for.

This past weekend, at a writers' workshop, I was given a tremendous gift, serendipitously; one that I want to share.

We were discussing plot, tension, conflict. And the instructor stopped and looked at us, and smiled, and asked us if we knew the most important thing about conflict...

Nobody said a word. It wasn't the usual shy student silence, because there was nobody under 40 in the room, and we'd all been outspoken at different times that day. This was the silence of sudden realization. Not one of us felt able to answer that question, and we were stunned as we recognized the fact.

"It's very simple," she explained. "The most important thing to remember about conflict is this: real conflict cannot be resolved by a conversation. Talking about it cannot fix it. The only thing that can resolve real conflict is change or growth of one or both of the parties in the conflict."

We all sat for a moment, letting it sink in, and then began to come up with examples. From literature, from life.

I came home dazed. The whole day had been fantastically instructive and encouraging, but the most valuable gift of all was this insight. It rang absolutely true. It was something my gut had known for decades, but my mind had never been able to put into words.

Conflict, real conflict, isn't about two people arguing over a parking space. It's about the extent to which one of them will go to get that space away from the other one... and about how the other one reacts to that knowledge. It's about recognizing what lies beneath... seeing the Shadow in daily life. And making decisions based on that knowledge.

Change. Growth. Without them, no resolution. Without them, do we replay the same basic conflicts over and over, simply changing partners? And do others invite us into their endlessly revolving dance as well?

Is this one of the sources of the repetition compulsion? Is it, possibly, the fundamental source?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Searching online, I found several people thinking about conflict in this way. Here is a quote from some folks at the University of Colorado: I've added emphases.

"...left alone, conflict can have destructive consequences. However, the consequences can be modified or transformed so that self-images, relationships, and social structures improve as a result of conflict instead of being harmed by it. Usually this involves transforming perceptions of issues, actions, and other people or groups. Since conflict usually transforms perceptions by accentuating the differences between people and positions, effective conflict transformation can work to improve mutual understanding. Even when people's interests, values, and needs are different, even non- reconcilable, progress has been made if each group gains a relatively accurate understanding of the other.
...
... transformation, Lederach suggests, must take place at both the personal and the systemic level. At the personal level, conflict transformation involves the pursuit of awareness, growth, and commitment to change which may occur through the recognition of fear, anger, grief, and bitterness. These emotions must be outwardly acknowledged and dealt with in order for effective conflict transformation to occur."

More here: http://www.colorado.edu/conflict/transform/jplall.htm

And here are excerpts from an essay by Dr. Lederach, who is cited above:

"In common everyday settings we experience social conflict as a time when a disruption occurs in the "natural" discourse of our relationships. As conflict emerges, we stop and take notice that something is not right. The relationship in which the difficulty is arising becomes complicated, not easy and fluid as it once was. We no longer take things at face value, but rather spend greater time and energy to interpret what things mean. As our communication becomes more difficult, we find it harder and harder to express our perceptions and feelings. We also find it more difficult to understand what others are doing and saying, and may develop feelings of uneasiness and anxiety. This is often accompanied by a growing sense of urgency and frustration as the conflict progresses, especially if no end is in sight.
...
...what are useful lenses that bring varying aspects of conflict complexity into focus and at the same time create a picture of the whole? This essay will suggest three.

First, we need a lens to see the immediate situation.

Second, we need a lens to see past the immediate problems and view the deeper relationship patterns that form the context of the conflict. This goes beyond finding a quick solution to the problem at hand, and seeks to address what is happening in human relationships at a deeper level.

Third, we need a lens that helps us envision a framework that holds these together and creates a platform to address the content, the context, and the structure of the relationship. From this platform, parties can begin to find creative responses and solutions."

From here: http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/transformation/ .

And this is the search -- http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=conflict+transformation+&btnG=Google+Search .

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Concluding thoughts...

Using this model, conflict is not something that people simply turn on and off, for an evening's entertainment; the TV-sitcom model is a totally false one. It isn't something that can be hashed out over a cup of coffee, and put safely and permanently to rest with ample time for all of the commercials to run before the half hour ends.

Instead, it is something deep, fundamental, something that comes from the core... something that has enormous power to harm, but if squarely faced, has even greater power to heal and transform.

Genuinely dealing with conflict requires a willingness to learn things about oneself and about others that may be - discomfiting, perhaps painful, perhaps embarrassing.

And even more than this: willingness to change, to be changed, to be open to new ways of seeing, new ways of being - is the key to genuine resolution.

Small wonder the task seems so daunting.
« Last Edit: September 19, 2006, 10:43:15 PM by Stormchild »
The only way out is through, and the only way to win is not to play.

"... truth is all I can stand to live with." -- Moonlight52

http://galewarnings.blogspot.com

http://strangemercy.blogspot.com

http://potemkinsoffice.blogspot.com

WRITE

  • Guest
Re: The Nature of Conflict
« Reply #1 on: September 19, 2006, 10:39:52 PM »
real conflict cannot be resolved by a conversation. Talking about it cannot fix it. The only thing that can resolve real conflict is change or growth of one or both of the parties in the conflict."

yes, and that horrible quality which seems to have eluded me: patience....

penelope

  • Guest
Re: The Nature of Conflict
« Reply #2 on: September 19, 2006, 11:00:10 PM »
thank you for sharing this storm.  There is a lot of wisdom here.

bean

Certain Hope

  • Guest
Re: The Nature of Conflict
« Reply #3 on: September 19, 2006, 11:18:12 PM »
Hi Stormy,

  This is truly excellent. I'm hoping to be able to follow it better in the morning, but for now... this business of conflict transformation seems to have as its near-end result an arrival at the sort of maturity which ceases to take offense.

  Re: In common everyday settings .......The relationship in which the difficulty is arising becomes complicated, not easy and fluid as it once was. We no longer take things at face value, but rather spend greater time and energy to interpret what things mean........

Oh yeah. Indeed. I think it's safe to say that we can get downright paranoid and the truth is (I believe) people often find exactly what they're looking for. In other words... if we're looking for offense to pick up, we'll surely find it!


Re:  (Conflict is) something deep, fundamental, something that comes from the core... something that has enormous power to harm, but if squarely faced, has even greater power to heal and transform.

Amen. Oh boy, amen. Thank you for this! Doesn't seem near as daunting a task now  :)

Love you, Stormy

Hope

P.S.   How about willingness to compromise? Sometimes that's the only solution to conflict I've found within intimate relationships where walking away is not an option. Of course, both parties must share the willingness... and I guess that's a pretty big unspoken "if", not to mention the fact that it also requires considerable emotional maturity.

Portia

  • Guest
Re: The Nature of Conflict
« Reply #4 on: September 20, 2006, 07:16:49 AM »
Way to go Storm!  :D So glad you got so much out of the weekend. Sounds instructive and helpful on so many levels. Are you going to more?

And Jac : Ahhh, to address the situation rather than ignore and pretend it doesn't exist is the anthesis to conflict!!!

Soooo truuuuue! But so many people I think find the level of honesty necessary to address the situation beyond their reach, and even if they want to be honest, fear stops the conversation, or they become aggressive instead of being honest. What do you think? Fear is the killer but what is there to fear, really?

Portia

  • Guest
Re: The Nature of Conflict
« Reply #5 on: September 20, 2006, 08:46:41 AM »
Hi Jac

I like your new quote (is it a quote? The Matrix?) “Have I now become your enemy by telling the truth?” because it’s so true – that truth-telling is often persecuted. Mind you, it depends on what the truth-telling is (i.e. abusive truth-telling versus truth-telling to help). I suppose that’s back to ‘intention’ again? If I intend to help (truly, not just kidding myself) I’ll empathise. If I intend to hurt, the truth will be cruel and un-empathetic, its intention will be to wound, like an aggressive attack.

Passive aggression is crazy-making stuff. “How could you hurt me like that after all I’ve done for you” kind of rubbish. It takes your eye off the ball, changes the discussion to their own agenda I guess. And yes, I end up thinking what the heck just happened? It takes me a long time to work these things out, after they’ve happened too. When you’re really busy, it’s easy to just let them go without analysis. I reckon there’s no such thing as too much thinking though  :D


WRITE

  • Guest
Re: The Nature of Conflict
« Reply #6 on: September 20, 2006, 10:41:10 AM »
abusive truth-telling versus truth-telling to help). I suppose that’s back to ‘intention’ again? If I intend to help (truly, not just kidding myself) I’ll empathise. If I intend to hurt, the truth will be cruel and un-empathetic, its intention will be to wound, like an aggressive attack.

absolutely!

I sometimes listen to people and think 'how can you think that was helpful?' but then I've done it myself, been zealous, overenthusiastic or simply mean-spirited.

Passive aggression is crazy-making stuff. “How could you hurt me like that after all I’ve done for you” kind of rubbish.

something I've been thinking about a lot lately. Agression v. love.
People are always telling me to be more agressive but I've never found it works nearly so well as love.
Love is unconditional really but we forget. Taking love into a situation is so scary: love goes where it goes and we don't know if we're freeing up someone to reject us or our agenda in some way.

Portia

  • Guest
Re: The Nature of Conflict
« Reply #7 on: September 20, 2006, 10:55:06 AM »
I've done it myself, been zealous, overenthusiastic or simply mean-spirited.

me too.

love goes where it goes and we don't know if we're freeing up someone to reject us or our agenda in some way.

Aggression versus assertion again? Assertion says "I am worthy" maybe aggression says "I'm more worthy than you"?

Do people need freedom to reject us, or can they do that anyway? I guess it depends on what we give, what we expect back (if anything). It's our expectations that cause us grief. I guess if someone rejects me or my ideas, that's their business, it doesn't necessarily diminish me. Unless I need their approval in some way?  Interesting, that love might make us vulnerable: does it really?

Certain Hope

  • Guest
Re: The Nature of Conflict
« Reply #8 on: September 20, 2006, 11:21:59 AM »
Dear Write,

 Re: this ~  I sometimes listen to people and think 'how can you think that was helpful?' but then I've done it myself, been zealous, overenthusiastic or simply mean-spirited.

  I know alot of people who seem to think that they have what's often referred to in Christianity as the "gift of exhortation".
Unfortunately, that gift often seems to get confused with a total lack of consideration and tact. I was one of these zealots and no doubt this characteristic was only compounded in me by the fact that I'd been so voiceless as a child.
   On a parallel note.... Years ago, I heard a Chuck Swindoll message in which he thanked God that the gifts within the Church are diverse, so that not every local body of believers need be overloaded with "exhorters". This made a bit of a dent in my hard shell, but it still took a number of years and alot of humbling to bring me out of that phase. Back then, I'd get especially worked up when talking with a woman whose children appeared to be at risk for sexual abuse. One of the most difficult things for me to come to terms with was the fact that my motives were not pure. Of course, I was concerned for the children, but there was more to it. I had left my husband and watched my dream of the ideal family disintegrate and I was left with a sense that I had made a great sacrifice. This produced a root of pride in me which evidenced itself in a bitter condemnation of others who wouldn't see the risk, the problem, the danger within their own families. Basically, I saw danger everywhere and wanted others to see it, too. I was unable to allow for the possibility that their situation was not my own and extend love, mercy, gentleness to them. The fog of my own grief and pain blinded me to the fact that not everyone can or even should see things as I did and respond in the same way. I'm thankful for all the lessons now, to be able to allow others to be who they are and not superimpose my views as though they are written in stone.

Love,
Hope

P.S.  Started walking my big dog yesterday (little ones are tooooo hyper!) and thought of you and smiled.


ANewSheriff

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
Re: The Nature of Conflict
« Reply #9 on: September 20, 2006, 03:35:37 PM »
Storm:
Quote
Change. Growth. Without them, no resolution. Without them, do we replay the same basic conflicts over and over, simply changing partners? And do others invite us into their endlessly revolving dance as well?

Yes... 

ANS
Change the way you see the world and you will change the world.

Stormchild

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1183
  • It's about becoming real.
    • Gale Warnings
Re: The Nature of Conflict
« Reply #10 on: September 20, 2006, 08:02:25 PM »
Thanks everyone - Write, Pb, Hope, jac, Portia, ANS -

thinking today at work, I realized THIS is the reason I get so wound up on the subject of 'cheap grace'... it's pseudo-resolution without ever really facing the conflict.

I'm beginning to think my first full-length nonfiction book should be on the subject of evading vs. embracing growth... maybe I'll call it "The Death of a Thousand Short-Cuts"... !
The only way out is through, and the only way to win is not to play.

"... truth is all I can stand to live with." -- Moonlight52

http://galewarnings.blogspot.com

http://strangemercy.blogspot.com

http://potemkinsoffice.blogspot.com

teartracks

  • Guest
Re: The Nature of Conflict
« Reply #11 on: September 20, 2006, 10:02:22 PM »
Hope,


Quote
      I know alot of people who seem to think that they have what's often referred to in Christianity as the "gift of exhortation". Unfortunately, that gift often seems to get confused with a total lack of consideration and tact. I was one of these zealots and no doubt this characteristic was only compounded in me by the fact that I'd been so voiceless as a child      
Quote

Early on, I had a Christian teacher who said, that one of the first warning signs that pride was at work rather than the true gift of exhortation was if you were chomping at the bit or were burning rubber hurrying  to the person you thought you were called to exhorted.  She was a wonderful teacher.

*************************************************************************    

Storm,

Quote
             Serendipity: finding valuable or agreeable things not sought for.      
Quote
   

Serendiipity:  I've not experienced it often, at least not consciously, but when I have It had been devine.  It didn't happen to me, but I witnessed it happen to someone else recently.  I love serendipity!

    *************************       

Quote
        Talking about it cannot fix it. The only thing that can resolve real conflict is change or growth of one or both of the parties in the conflict." We all sat for a moment, letting it sink in, and then began to come up with examples. From literature, from life.

I came home dazed. The whole day had been fantastically instructive and encouraging, but the most valuable gift of all was this insight. It rang absolutely true. It was something my gut had known for decades, but my mind had never been able to put into words.

Conflict, real conflict, isn't about two people arguing over a parking space. It's about the extent to which one of them will go to get that space away from the other one... and about how the other one reacts to that knowledge. It's about recognizing what lies beneath... seeing the Shadow in daily life. And making decisions based on that knowledge.

Change. Growth. Without them, no resolution. Without them, do we replay the same basic conflicts over and over, simply changing partners? And do others invite us into their endlessly revolving dance as well?

Is this one of the sources of the repetition compulsion? Is it, possibly, the fundamental source?
 
     
Quote

Your observation is a keen one Storm,  I'm wondering if simply talking about it (the conflict) doesn't actually reinforce the it?  Is there something rather  Skinnerish about this?

I loved the example you used of the parking space.  Remember that scene in Fried Green Tomatoes when  the hot young things wheeled their VW into a parking space that the menopausal, plump, getting through the day, frustrated woman had her eye on?  When they took her parking place she rammed her Cadillac into their  VW and let them know that she had more money and better insurance.  Anyway. back to your point.  Yes, yes, yes.  When we drive  a parking lot hundreds of times over a lifetime with one thing on our mind,  getting that juicy parking space before someone else, that reinforces that kind of thinking and behavior. As we do it, we are reinforcing, feeding a part of us that feels entitled to the best parking space, not every now and then, but every time. 

Moving on to an active, ongoing conflict becomes  more complicated.  .By now, the conflict has legs, a life running on parallel paths.  Well, you've figured it out.  No need for me to go on.

Good show!

teartracks

gratitude28

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2582
Re: The Nature of Conflict
« Reply #12 on: September 20, 2006, 10:35:33 PM »
Dogbert says that either people agree with you or else they say something stupid....

See... no conflict!!!

Seriously, awesome topic and subtopics and great info and lots to think about.
Love, Beth
"There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable." Douglas Adams

Certain Hope

  • Guest
Re: The Nature of Conflict
« Reply #13 on: September 20, 2006, 11:04:28 PM »
Hi, Jac,

  I understand the concept of transference. I also know that a thief is not the only one who suspects others of stealing.
When a person has been robbed on multiple occasions, he tends to get a keen sense of who may be a potential thief. Same thing with this business of those who thrill to what I'd term the curse of exhortation (as opposed to the true gift, given by God). I've been there. I've known many such folks and I've been one myself, and there is no mistaking a person who is ever eager to point out a speck in his neighbor's eye while he continues tripping over the beam dangling out of his own. In my opinion, Teartracks' former teacher was correct:  one of the first warning signs that pride was at work rather than the true gift of exhortation was if you were chomping at the bit or were burning rubber hurrying  to the person you thought you were called to exhort 

   The bottom line to me is... if the truth is not delivered in love, with gentleness and respect, then it's attached to a prideful spirit.
I don't believe that anyone is trying to superimpose his own view onto me and if they are, they're not likely to get too far. I also do not believe that resistance to another person's agenda always indicates some deep psychological issue. Sometimes it's a simple matter of...
if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and it quacks like a duck, well then... it's a pretty good bet that critter's a duck.  I've realized just lately that people get "religious" about all sorts of things, not just Christ, or Allah, or Buddha. It's that sort of vain religious attitude of which I was thinking when I posted to Write about this "spirit of exhortation". When that is present, it's pretty obvious, because everything tends to be one-sided, flat, cold, and lifeless. That's what I beware of. Thanks for pointing out the risks, though.

Love,
Hope

gratitude28

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2582
Re: The Nature of Conflict
« Reply #14 on: September 20, 2006, 11:30:14 PM »
Hope, in AA, we have a saying that we do things on the basis of "attraction, rather than promotion." I think this goes along with religion as well. Rather than chasing someone down to tell him how he must live his life, it is better to set the example of a good and clean life.
Love, Beth
"There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable." Douglas Adams