This is a quote from Dr G's essay, 'Little Vioces'.
voices" are the polar opposites of narcissists. The former relinquishes all "voice," while the latter gobbles it up. ............... Interestingly, the same voice-depriving family can produce "little voices" and "narcissists."
...........Why is this so? Genetic factors probably play the biggest role. Narcissism requires aggression, "little voice," passivity. Birth order may also count: if one child strives aggressively for family resources, it is that much harder for the next in line to compete using a similar method”
I identify a lot with the first part, how the N. gobbles up what the other relinquishes.
For me, tho it didnt seem that it was about genetics, or the other being more powerful. Its more about one child being designated for one role, and one child for the other. Like one sister was designated the N role, she was to rescue the self esteem for the family, even recently I found myself feeling that what she paid attention to became magically important/ embued with life. And after all those years in recovery too!
The other sister was designated as 'the one who needs to be helped and protected', so, she became the borderline.
And I was unplanned, and became the one to feel ashamed for my NM's shameless behaviour. I took in, or got installed with her disowned shame. When I read Ralph Klein, he calls it 'the human dustbuster', or one of his patients did!
Than at adolescence, I became averse allergic and disgusted by her behaviour. I think it was more an instincitve moral aversion to her behaviour, and desperate need to differentiate myself from her. Her way was to say '
we do .... / thnk...' in other words, her children are an extension of her, thinking differntly form her doesnt exist.
So, my moral instincts were right, but the combined consequences have been continued and destructive over my lifetime. Im doing all I can to recover, and have been for many years.
any thoughts, expereinces?