Voicelessness and Emotional Survival > Voicelessness and Emotional Survival Message Board

horrific corruption

(1/2) > >>

river:
hi,
I felt I needed to say something about whats been happening on these shores.   Its not just the corruption and irresponsibility of journalists, but now the main witness has 'mysteriously' died, and the press say the circumstance 'unnexplained but not suspicious'.  How can they not be suspicious when he takes to the grave with him most of the evidence?   the press are continuing to behave in the same corrupt way at the same time as others of them are 'apologising' for corruption.  

And Murdoch and co are refusing to take responsibility - 'the company is too big' is = to saying I was greedy enough to make the company too big for me to take responsibility for what goes on in it, I put ambition before my responsibilty,  so its not my fault.  

Any one have more thoughts about this?   Am I getting it wrong?  or over simplifying?  

Guest:
Hi River

How can they not be suspicious when he takes to the grave with him most of the evidence?

- not suspicious of his cause of death because the circumstances clearly point to (1) illness, heart attack etc or (2) suicide, or (3) stuff I haven't thought of. Just my conjecture. I reckon (2) but I have no idea. I don't reckon corporate sanctioned murder because that would be too damn obvious. Forced suicide maybe? Who knows.

river:

--- Quote --- 
I don't reckon corporate sanctioned murder because that would be too damn obvious. Forced suicide maybe? Who knows.

 
--- End quote ---

thanks for answering, this is whats troubling me maybe thear ARE being that blatent.  there has been similar things Jimmy Hendrix, Dr Kelly, Lady Di.   

the toxicology tests - if they show that there was lots of stuff in him, how do they know who put it there?  will anyone envestigate given he's not pretty like Milly Dowler?   

Guest:
given he's not pretty like Milly Dowler -

How do you feel about the McCann's best-selling book?  and so on.

river:
Well, yes, and so on.   But in that case its known that whatever happened to Maddie was done by a recognised criminal.  If Sean was murdered - as he had the evidence, was the first whistle blower, and if its not recognised then the disturbing part is the sanctionedness of it, and the failure to react. 

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page