Voicelessness and Emotional Survival Message Board

Voicelessness and Emotional Survival => Voicelessness and Emotional Survival Message Board => Topic started by: Hopalong on March 06, 2019, 12:06:35 PM

Title: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on March 06, 2019, 12:06:35 PM
Hi guys,
Thought I'd move my talk about M to here, as it's pretty clear it's going to go on for a while!

Seeing him for dinner tonight after visiting his home for the first time, attending his dinner party for colleagues and a visiting poet on Saturday. A formal event coming up soon at the university which I'm not looking forward to but he asked and is the "MC" so want to be supportive of that.

He continues to be sweet, clearly open to happiness, high energy and delightful. I'm still trying to get my head around how much life change could be ahead if this continues.

I notice I'm retreating to the womb (bed, pooch, escapism) again but not panicking about it. So I overall am okay though T is wanting to dig into the things that may be contributing to my paralysis behavior. I need to be willing to do that.

I abandoned the exercise program and am upset with myself about that. On the other hand, their monitoring made clear I'm healthy enough to just do it on my own. Which is my own battle to fight.

All in all okay and hopeful!

love
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on March 06, 2019, 03:03:26 PM
Ok, Hops....
I want details. 

What food was served?

Who did you connect with?

What did you wear?

How was the wine?!?

Just everything.

I'm so glad you're enjoying yourself!

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Bettyanne on March 06, 2019, 08:01:26 PM
Hi Hops......
I'm coming in sideways to this post.......
I hope your holding in there beeing good to yourself......exercise etc ways

Love......Bettyanne
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on March 06, 2019, 10:32:47 PM
Thanks, Lighter!
Be glad to post-dates report, it's fun!

Tonight I went to his house for the first time, and he hauled out fancy wine (I don't know from wine collections but it was a yummy French chablis) and he'd prepared home-made crostini with smoked salmon and capers and wonderful cheese that begins with M, plus ditto yummy olives, and then we went to a local Thai restaurant for a nice quiet dinner--deelish--and he told me a lot more about his family and also the death of his wife, which I was glad he shared about. Much more open and I think probably being on his home turf relaxed him.

The house is lovely. Way too big for one person and overlooking a lake, very quiet cul de sac, deer in the yard (of course). Elegant neighborhood.

He's ALL about food culture and has cooked his whole life. I asked again if I could be even a little help Saturday and he said I could turn up early and just sit and drink wine and talk to him. Okay!

Thanks, ((((Bettyanne)))). I really do need to get my lard butt exercising again, especially as I have acquired this pudgy (adorable) manfriend who lives for fine food and wine. HE may be happy pudgy, but I ain't!

xxoo
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on March 07, 2019, 06:45:00 AM
So, ahhh, emailed him a thanks for dinner/evening and also said more than all that I enjoyed being with him, and more each time.

Just got his reply which was to say we get better every time we're together and he "can't believe this is happening."

My emoticons on VESMB don't work any more but I thought there once was a blushing one.

Dang, y'all!

Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on March 07, 2019, 07:20:27 AM


It certainly seems like M's feeling more comfortable, Hops.

I'm curious if it's easy to keep your food preferences in place.

Is it coming up, or just not an issue?

Also, what kind of music does M enjoy listening to?

Lighter


Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on March 07, 2019, 09:08:36 AM
Quote
He continues to be sweet, clearly open to happiness, high energy and delightful. I'm still trying to get my head around how much life change could be ahead if this continues.

I notice I'm retreating to the womb (bed, pooch, escapism) again but not panicking about it. So I overall am okay though T is wanting to dig into the things that may be contributing to my paralysis behavior. I need to be willing to do that.

uh.... Hops? Any chance you're just so close to those things that paralyze you, you're not seeing it? That the feelings are so refreshing intense and positive, that your normal thought processes are a bit discombobulated?

Re-read above... especially what I've bolded. Your words.

MOST people can be paralyzed when they're overwhelmed - either a seriously huge life change, or too many things that all seem equally important, all at one time, and no one to delegate decisions to. It sure happens to me, all the time!

(pick a day; I'll not do a blessed thing because I can't deal with so many things to prioritize! Then, I'll just see some LITTLE, I mean blessed tiny thing, wouldn't even make anyone else's list... that I "wanted" to do, to please or suit myself - sometimes just straightening a picture... and voila... the paralysis spell is broken.)

My advice for you (custom-designed):
For the time being - you only just met the guy - rank the priority of "future life changes" the very LAST thing on the importance list. You don't have to; it isn't a good idea; and I don't recommend... making a decision about something SO important, like that NOW. NOW, isn't the right time to get into the process of making that decision. The real important decisions CAN BE, SHOULD BE postponed until you are clear in your mind/feelings/understanding all the details involved.

NOW, you observe... you actually feel... and plan regular (like weekly) 10 min/20 min cocoon sessions to assess and take stock cognitively, and analyze what's going on with you. (So you don't short-change that side of yourself for attention and to properly observe any red flags she might be waving.) And let yourself get swept off your feet in the meantime...

because you can DO IT. Because you AREN'T going to let yourself fall... that's what those short, time-limited "check in with my feelings/better judgement" sessions are for, right? You still want what you want long term, but until you've experienced being IN a relationship - which this is not yet; you're just seeing each other, enjoying yourself and getting to know each other - you won't know enough about him, you and how you are together to decide if this is THE relationship you want to sign on to.

Maybe I'm way too careful (others would say paranoid) to the point that I'm not even able to get replies from anyone on any of those dating sites (oh sure, the young, young men... who don't know any better; I'm not the cougar type) SO... please add salt to taste regarding my advice and realize who it's coming from.

There is no obligation or expectation that the advice must be taken. LOL. Your money back! Exactly what you paid for MY "two cents worth" of opinion.

----------------- ETA-----

What I meant to say, before I got so carried away with being tickled silly pink for you...

is that only TIME and EXPERIENCE will tell, if you'll even be in a position to entertain the POSSIBILITY of wanting|needing|deciding about....... "life changes", with this guy.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on March 10, 2019, 11:54:45 PM
Hops?

How's it going?

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on March 11, 2019, 03:31:19 PM
Hey Lighter, it goes very well. Happiness is coexisting along all SORTS of stuff that imminent intimacy brings to the surface. So at the moment happiness is part flow part hard work! I'm actually relieved he'll be in SF for a week after Tuesday.

Amber, I needed very much to hear that perspective. Thank you.
You are RIGHT; I need to slow it down to the present task...getting to know, new experiences/tests, find out more, check and recheck intuition and evidence. Not to be paranoid but I know I must.

Meanwhile, it IS feeling lovely. Kicking up a notch, feelings wise. Definitely reciprocal. He's heading for SF Tuesday for a week and his plan to move continues. A year plus a couple months out. Yes, I don't need to decide right now.

But, I am not far from dropping my guard and letting my heart go all in and take this risk. So that's that. I just need to face that loss is always possible, and meanwhile, I can still choose happiness and see what happens. If I'm disappointed, ultimately, I'll cope. It's all living/learning, etc.

It's waves of stuff. Waking up in my little house this morning and thinking...no more? Hard. But if I want what I want, there is no way around that my little-house life will change. That said, T this morning said just what you said. And advised me to re-focus on loving and enjoying and de-cluttering my little house, because regardless of what happens in future, that creates happiness and value for me in the now. It really does.

Meanwhile, he's inviting me for a week in Paris in July. After that he's off to lecture in Israel, visit Istanbul and return to Spain. So he'll be gone the rest of that month. I'll get my own ticket and he'll treat me to hotel and meals. Sounds like an offer it'll be tough to refuse! I am getting a new passport (plus new Euro "visa-not-visa") so I'll have the option if we both realize it's still a right move closer to then.

Good T session. I struggle NOT to talk about the paralysis behavior, clutter, etc. But I made myself hang in with it. Turns out the hiding in bed and not dealing with home in an adult way has to do with me abandoning myself, plus being defiant, plus being ADD. But she invited me to stop the shame spiral and just invite my inner adult to engage because that's self care, period. She's right.

After our appt pooch and I took a nice long walk downtown, visiting a friend for tea in the middle of the walk. She's loaning me a glam outfit for the formal thing I'm going to (M will be the "MC" in his tux). So that's a load off my mind. Still have to invest in some form of non-heel shoe that will get by.

And meanwhile, M is sending me lovestruck cute little emails. Dang. It's sweet!

My commitment for this afternoon is to get at least a START on the clothes purge in bedroom, and to sketch out a specific time-use plan for tomorrow morning, so I don't yield to the usual back-to-bed behavior.

xxoo
Hops

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on March 11, 2019, 10:03:21 PM
Hops, may I suggest a ballet flat? in satin, velvet or suede? Maybe sequins?  :D

OOOO, Paris!

Be happy Hops.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on March 12, 2019, 01:46:22 PM
Good shoes idea, Amber! Thanks, that's perfect. A friend is loaning me some long swishy glam pants and I have a top that will fake formal fine. YAY!

Quote
I say, beware of all enterprises that require new clothes, and not rather a new wearer of clothes. Henry David Thoreau

So. Got passport app ready, soon as this cold (achoo kind) eases up I'll be off to deliver it. Dug out my previous one (1972) and cracked up because I was so clearly stoooooooned in the pic. I remember that day and it's true. Oh once was young.

I'm going to Paris with M early July, then to Oslo on my own for a few days, then back to Paris and home. Can't quite take it in but happy my traveling days aren't over forever. He's gifting me the Paris to and from, and I'm gifting myself the Norway stretch. Won't be easy but life is short. My friend Erik wrote back instantly how pleased they are. Unfortunately they have no guest room so I need to spend on a nearby B&B, and Oslo is very expensive. But I'm so looking forward to it! Will try to book new work between now and then so I don't deplete savings too much.

I haven't allowed myself to do anything like this in a very very very long time.

xxoo
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on March 12, 2019, 07:49:55 PM
Clapping long & loudly here, Hops....
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on March 13, 2019, 08:43:24 AM
Well, that was a very happy read, Hops.

And kind if magical!

I second the ballet flats. 

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on March 13, 2019, 09:03:56 AM
Hops, I'm so happy to read this :)  M sounds as if he has a very full and interesting life, which I think is great.  I honestly believe relationships are better if two people who have varied and interesting lives come together, rather than each other being the sole focus, if that makes sense?  This sounds so great, you are both busy with your own things but you have much in common and various places you can meet in the middle.  And a trip to Paris interspersed with a flying visit to Norway?  Wow.  I am so envious and so very glad for you as well.  What a magical situation to be in.  Your T sounds very helpful and I so wish I lived near you; purging your clothes sounds like an afternoon I would enjoy :)  I'm glad you feel able to go with this and are trying to focus on what's going on now.  It's hard not to think about 'what if'; good or bad, so I'm glad you're having a good time and are able to step out of the paralysis enough to enjoy this :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on March 19, 2019, 10:53:22 PM
(((((((Tupp))))))))), thank you.
One of the first thoughts I had when I realized I'd be going across the pond for the first time since 1972 was, I wish I could extend it enough to get to the U.K. and meet Tupp!

It's all still up in the air but I need to get my passport application in tomorrow!

love
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on March 20, 2019, 07:24:41 AM
Meeting up with all of you from the board would be such an amazing thing - we can all hope to do it one day :)  But in the meantime, get that passport application in!  First things first lol
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on March 31, 2019, 08:27:54 AM
Done! Passport in, Oslo and Paris friends contacted for reunion. Dog sitters set for interviews (Pooch will pick the one she likes best).

And...love has been declared. On both sides. Well, his in a series of escalating emails from Costa Rica, where he and his brother have been doing some maintenance at his ridiculous house. (Which also has a "couple" in a "cottage" who do the rest.) Sheesh.

I got right up to the wire, then told him email "can't have everything" and I wanted to see his face when I told him how I feel. He knows. I know. And it's pretty amazing.

His key question so far has been: "What's to be done with two pianos?"

We'll start this week slowly taking steps and talking a ton and gradually figuring out how these two lives might merge. It's only been two months, but here we are. Maybe age escalates things. Something about limited time makes carpe diem easier than in the years when everything could be analysed into particles. For months.

I am in a state of gratitude, astonishment, etc. His only apprehension is fear of loss since he knows how awful grief can be. Mine is not as much that as fear of upheaval, leaving here one day not far away for the other side of the continent. But much as I love my wee house, cocoon, and all the familiarity I depend on, I have also faced the fact that as long as I live alone here, I'll never be truly happy. Sometimes for periods I will be, but not in a sustained way. Friends are dear and wonderful, but none are in my life so closely that even a phone call comes in every day. It's just not the way life is happening. For him, the world is jammed with important people to love, and adventure and work and all sorts of very full activity. I will need my retreats, but I think he's bringing me back to life.

He comes back Wednesday and I asked if instead of a restaurant evening, we could hang out in "jeans and socks." Because he's such a foodie he immediately plans the  meal he'll make. And I said Cheerios would be fine. He said no, scallops. I do not care. This is one area we'll stumble over now and then. His near-obsession with food and my desire to focus more on nutrition than pleasure. Makes me boring but too much fixation on it makes me fat. (And he shows that some, himself.)

So of course he had to order me a collection of fabulous socks. I tactfully refused a string of pearls he brought me from S.F. It turned out to be a wonderful exchange, in which he exuberantly hoped I'd wear them with my own tiny ones (from my Dad) to the formal thing coming up (which I am SO not looking forward to). He mentioned it more than once. I had to wryly but unmistakably explain that I am a Card Carrying Feminist Who Never Lets Anyone Tell Me What to Wear. He not only got it, he loved it. He raved about my independence and honesty.

Knock me over with a feather.

xxoo
Hops

PS - As though to compensate for the pearls thing, I told him I hate my socks, I will greedily accept all the socks he wants to buy me, and he went ridiculous. Raved about Bombas and ordered me a set and backordered all the bright colors. This is FUN! Then he wrote me a whole other thing about loving that I am happier with a gift of socks than pearls. Whew.

PPS - Why I am weird about pearls: As lovely and lustrous as they are, to me they are a reminder of many oppressive dictates about "ladies" as I grew up. I can't escape that association and don't want to. Coco Chanel can go sit on a tack, I just can't do pearls. So he proposed that we make an excursion to a nearby larger city where I get to pick out something that I really do like, and I said sure! (I think something that doesn't cost hundreds and maybe from the art museum's shop.)
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on April 01, 2019, 07:12:14 AM
Hops:

That's quite an update!  Wowsers, and I'm so happy for you: )

Continue speaking your mind, and holding your space.  Don't give it up for a man.  Any man.

If he's truly happy with your independence, he won't crush it... not in small ways.  Not at all.

Hold you ground, Hops.

HOld.

Lighter
ps  I like the idea of you selecting a handmade piece of jewelry that brings you joy, while skipping the pearls. 
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on April 01, 2019, 10:29:17 AM
OK, so I'm giggling over here... you sound head over heels, Hops! And I LIKE IT. I also like that it feels right to you and that he is responsive to your likes/dislikes and respectful.

Go figure; the ancient tomboy that I am... just loves pearls. Maybe for the rediculousness of the contrast between my carhartts and muddy boots. Coco would have the vapors just from the juxtaposition...

Maybe one of the pianos can be donated to a senior center or nursing home?
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 01, 2019, 01:52:12 PM
((((((((Lighter)))))))), thanks. I'm not about to dissolve. He is just as vulnerable (in the good sense) as I am. His feelings are uncalculated and transparent. I'll have to deal with his professor ego and giant-size intellect at times but for some reason I feel comfortable being myself. No pretzeling into someone else's fantasy.  say No pretty well, and that's key. Boundaries feel right. He's so excited that I'm the one reminding him to breathe!

(((((((((((Amber))))))))))), you got that country sexy that could TOTALLY carry off pearls and muddy boots!


xxoo
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on April 01, 2019, 02:14:28 PM
Just a gentle reminder that red flags can pop up after the initial hoop hopping has passed, IME.  After you feel fully grounded, and set on a certain particular joyful path, IME.

These flags tend to creep in.... over small things.... once we've put expectations in place.  I think I've heard it explained like this..... "They've been good enough, long enough, that they can do anything to us, and we'll take it."  In other words, they did what they needed to do, to gain our complete trust, and belief in them.   That complete trust is a powerful thing.

If we hear it, and fail to speak up that first time....

If we see it, and close our eyes that first time....

it's that very first excuse we make to explain away a red flag, to ourselves, we have to watch for, IME.

We can't make an excuse.  We have to call them on it, state that boundary, and follow up with the consequences SHOULD THEY FAIL TO COMPLY WITH THE BOUNDARY, and be prepared to follow through, IME.  That's the magic in avoiding unhealthy attachments, IME. 

I think you'd see it, and remain fierce feminist Hops, but I had to put it on the board, just in case.   I'm watchful that way.

Again, I'm so happy for you, Hops!

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 01, 2019, 03:27:31 PM
Yes, thanks Lighter.
I will never allow myself to overlook any serious red flag. I promise.

When I married my second husband who shortly became Mr. Hyde, I let the whole mess endure for seven years, believing in words more than behavior. What I boiled into my bone marrow after that (and being single since 1995 and saying plenty of Nos) ... was that if it meant leaving on my honeymoon, leaving after day one, week one, year one, for the rest of my life I would exercise my right to LEAVE.

If it became necessary, I'd do it again. In a heartbeat. I am not afraid.

xxoo (but thank you for your wariness anyway, I'm really grateful, and feel free to remind me ANY time you hear me rationalizing something here, please.)
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on April 03, 2019, 02:51:37 AM
Oh Hops, this is so lovely to read :)  Wow.  You two really do sound like a good match.  I understand completely the sort of 'let's just get on with it' feeling - and in some I'd see that as a warning sign but, as you've said, you've walked these paths before and your eyes are very open.  He does sound great and I love the fact that he isn't upset or offended by your refusals or requests for something different.  I've found myself thinking about relationships a lot lately and I think the ones that work are the ones where the other person knows our blindspots and our dark areas and embraces them as part of who we are (and that we are able to do that for them).

Completely understand the pearls thing, I have the same issue with heels, which I used to wear a lot because it's what "women do".  I am finding I'm rejecting a lot of femininity as I get older, particularly with regard to things like dying my hair (to cover the grey) and worrying about wrinkles.  My son has concluded that the bath is some sort of anti aging device, as you wrinkle when you're in it but the wrinkles smooth away once you get out :)

I love the image of Coco Chanel sitting on a tack :)  And yes, I get what you say about friends.  I have friends, I have places I can go, I have things I can do but there isn't anyone to sit up late with and just talk about whatever we want to talk about.  I miss that.

I'm delighted for you.  He sounds a much better match than B, sweet hearted though he was.  Can you just keep the two pianos?  I like the idea of one for everyday and one for best :)  Lol xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on April 03, 2019, 09:25:03 AM
 Tupp, now I have this image of Hops having crazy dueling piano dinner parties; )
Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on April 03, 2019, 10:31:47 AM
Tupp, now I have this image of Hops having crazy dueling piano dinner parties; )
Lighter

Lol, whilst having "who can wear the craziest socks" competitions and flinging strings of pearls from upstairs windows :) I can't wait to hear all about it :) xx xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 03, 2019, 10:31:50 PM
Since they're both grand pianos, we could put them end to end in some long room...great idea! Nah, I'll likely keep my little house mostly furnished as it is right here, and come back for long stretches. Maybe we'd redo the larger bedroom as a retreat for us both and it could be our pied a terre if he wants to come too. I dunno, but we'll sort it all out. His present ridiculous house is enough space for a family of 10. But given the generations of family stuff he's archiving, he might need it. Not me. I am living light as a feather compared to him and I do not envy the affluence. (I like the basic security for old age part, a LOT, but NOT the "stuff." Ugh.)

Pooch had a great time skittering around on his fancy carpets and charging up and down stairs. He stuffed her with milkbones and although she was vigilant as before, she was more relaxed. The nice thing is he's sensitive and observant. We both noticed when he reached out his arm toward me (to stroke my hair) along the couch she tensed up and watched with concern. No leaping or biting, but she has that memory: man's arm heading toward woman's head, not good! She caught on, though. It's safe. He's great with her and genuinely loves dogs.

Dinner and talking in 3-D at last was wonderful and we had a huge long conversation, still filling in loads of stories and gaps which will go on for ages. Lots of hugs and happiness. And I did get to look him right in the eyes to tell him how I feel and that felt great. We're in a good place, and what's been different for him was that he was on the dating site for one week before running across me, and I had been on and off these sites without success for MANY YEARS. He simply couldn't process that it happened so soon. But he's caught on and is happy too!

So. One day, one email, one time together at a time, and we'll just start accumulating each others' stories and figure out who we are. Since he's a cultural historian, every single anecdote about his family wanders in and out of a huge family tree and he explains somebody's relationship to somebody general such and so and detoured to some ambassador and industrialist A and industrialist B and I am as lost as I would be in a math spreadsheet. But it's how he narrates his world, with constant detours, so I get it. I just talk about people and insights and behaviors and what drives folks. Because the dates and timelines wreck my brain.

Turns out, being miserable and thinking so hard about why for so very long is actually a nice place to be as an older person. I feel WISE! And appreciated, and he's so pragmatic and driven and accomplishment oriented that he's a great balance for someone with negligible executive function.

(I forgot to take the pearls to him. Will do that Saturday. He's already ordered me more socks. This is ri di cu lous.)

love you all, so gratefully...
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on April 04, 2019, 11:08:01 AM
I'm so happy for ya Hops!

Could be you're developing a real connection at the same time, you're having loads of fun - as you each share about yourselves. And you ARE WISE! we have all benefited here from your insights and perspective.

Maybe... just maybe... this is the "missing piece" in your life, that balances the inward looking?

Two of my favorite people finding "partners in joy" - you and Hol - are encouraging me to not give up on my own search for another "Mr. Right" for "Right Now".
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 04, 2019, 01:03:31 PM
I think so, (((Amber))).
I really do think for both of us, we're what's been missing.
He's been telling me that in terms of how I think and observe, I'm something he's been lacking his whole life. I respond with compassion to a vulnerability and he's poleaxed. He's been over-driven, forever. Something about that weighty family tree has been holding him down, or holding him back from joy, I believe. So that's what I get to do and it's fun! I also make him laugh which makes me feel delighted, since there's not much I enjoy more.

I was relieved last night when he said there really could be up to two years to sort out the bi-coastal or whatever, and that made me feel less pressure. My hope is we'll turn it into shared creativity and adventure. Meanwhile, it's all so new that every encounter, every email, is full of discovery and fun.

For a renowned professor, he uses exclamation points and hyperbole like a teenager on twitter. (But they're all about MEEEEEEEEEEE.)

It's funny, and wondrous, and ridiculous, and human, and I am so so so lucky.

YOU? Hell yeah, woman. I'm telling you, there's the educated cowpoke survivalist of your dreams in the next holler over, for sure. Once he gets the internet working in his custom mahogany double wide, he's gonna find you. And one look at those boots and pearls and he'll be hitching up his Bobcat, whistling for his bluetick hound and making his way over to dig some postholes to try to impress you.

xxxxooo
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on April 05, 2019, 06:18:54 AM
I have tears in my eyes, Hops, I am so genuinely delighted for you and so happy to read that it's just sort of happening?  Without lots of angst or ignoring problems or pretending things are fine.  Is serendipity the word?  When things just seem to happen?  I'm glad Pooch approves as well and am so very happy for you.  I am really looking forward to reading more about what's happening and what you learn about each other.  Gosh, you really deserve a happy, fun filled chapter in your life :)  I'm so happy for you xx xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 05, 2019, 06:25:35 PM
So do YOUUUUUUUU, Tupp, so do you.

When you're down please remember:
1) How truly amazing and smart and wonderful and deep and VALUABLE you are, and

2) If ole Hops can receive a random act of kindness from the universe at nearly 69, it can happen to you too.

I don't think there's any magic potion except that I really did work on accepting whatever is while ALSO insisting that I find some way of being that kept space open for the possibility of good things happening. I'm no "Secret" believer, but I do know thinking that way made life better. Even if M had never responded to my profile, I was still feeling more open. Just...open. Not expecting.

Meanwhile, for you to be moved for me moves me. Thanks, dear. I really mean this gratitude.

(Of course, should M and I unexpectedly hit the dust or I discover some awful deal breaker, where else would I recover? Right HERE, thanks to you and everyone.)

Love,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on April 06, 2019, 02:17:07 AM
So do YOUUUUUUUU, Tupp, so do you.

When you're down please remember:
1) How truly amazing and smart and wonderful and deep and VALUABLE you are, and

2) If ole Hops can receive a random act of kindness from the universe at nearly 69, it can happen to you too.

I don't think there's any magic potion except that I really did work on accepting whatever is while ALSO insisting that I find some way of being that kept space open for the possibility of good things happening. I'm no "Secret" believer, but I do know thinking that way made life better. Even if M had never responded to my profile, I was still feeling more open. Just...open. Not expecting.

Meanwhile, for you to be moved for me moves me. Thanks, dear. I really mean this gratitude.

(Of course, should M and I unexpectedly hit the dust or I discover some awful deal breaker, where else would I recover? Right HERE, thanks to you and everyone.)

Love,
Hops

I think you are a shining example of how going through all the therapy and the figuring it out and the loneliness and that fear of always being alone can really pay off.  It's nice to see someone being rewarded because they refused to settle and just 'put up' with someone else's annoying habits.  Someone knowing themselves well enough to know what they want, what they don't, brave enough to look through it realistically and willing to risk 'being alone for ever' rather than selling themselves short - it takes nerve :) And yep, there is always a possibility of some awful revelation further down the life but that's life, isn't it?  I am increasingly aware that I'm looking back and regretting not taking some opportunities when I was younger - I had chances to make friends with people but I didn't feel confident enough, I had a chance to go to America as part of an exchange programme when I was at Uni and I turned it down because my boyfriend wouldn't have liked it.  There have been jobs I could have applied for and yes, it might have gone wrong but I wouldn't be wondering 'what if'.  So yes, I am delighted that you were brave enough to keep hanging on in there and to keep trying and I'm so happy that you and M will be playing the piano whilst wearing your mad socks :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 06, 2019, 02:44:50 AM
I am grateful that you perceive me as having been brave, and maybe at some junctures I have been. But no fooling, I truly have missed and neglected and bailed and skeered myself out of opportunities too in the past (and present) that could have made a very positive difference in my life.

This time I think I've been both lucky and open to the possibility of good things happening and did take one action. After years of it NOT working, I hopped back onto the older-folks dating site one more time, freshened up my profile making sure I said what I really wanted to say, and this time I'd told myself...well, I'm just going to keep at it longer. And stayed busy in between so I didn't obsess over it. And I wouldn't let myself get all up in knots about myself being a failure or success or whatever, however it went...I was just meeting new human beings for coffee. That was all I let it be. So I did enjoy that, even though most of those meetings were one-offs. I didn't regret meeting the "wrong" people, because I just kept the whole thing feeling kind inside toward myself and the other person. These 70-ish guys were vulnerable too. And I'd not even look for messages except about once a week, and contacts were slow. I turned it into just one thing I'd try to remember to check on now and then.

I feel lucky and grateful and so glad for friends here who'll put up with the blow by blow.

love
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on April 06, 2019, 09:50:28 AM
LOL.... telling stories on myself...

Hol INSISTED I let her look at my profile on that dating site and let her edit it. Since she met her new sweetie on Tinder, she now considers herself an "expert". (She always has been a good writer.)

Yeah, there was a glaring "message" that I really didn't want ANY attention, from ANYONE. And that, she said, meant I wasn't being honest with myself about what I really wanted -- and therefore would be interpreted as being a "hot mess" to any guys. It was my usual scaring people off - protecting them from ME - because I really did still feel I was a hot mess at that point in my travels from grief.

She also removed the bit about chasing guys down the aisles with chains and a roll of duct tape. LOL. Dammit. I thought it was cute & flirty. But my perception of these things, I'll admit, might be a tad bit skewed after one considers all I've been through. (Trying to get her to admit the same, of herself, is still a little hard. She compares us, a lot. And thinks she's stronger. LOL... totally forgetting all the years I spent working to help her keep an "open party line" between the gaslighting/projection in her relationship with Matt - and her real self. So she could see it; and deal with it.)

So, I have a live-in "mirror" these days; someone to provide feedback in a constructive, caring way. And that's kinda essential for me, I'm finding. I maybe have a ways to go, before I could claim any "being open" like you Hops, but along with spring dragging it's feet around here... I'm moving through stuff too. Dealing with some of the "other people's approval" of me - or not - too.

Puzzle pieces falling into close enough proximity, that I can see the connections and where each piece goes.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on April 06, 2019, 01:06:59 PM
:::Huge joyful clapping::  Hops!

 So glad you're enjoying M, and twirling like a girl in your heart.

Just twirl away, and don't worry about it. 

The twirling, today, is the important bit, IMO.

Lighter






Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 07, 2019, 01:29:22 AM
Thanks for twirling with me, imaginatively, Light!

Amber, how great that you let H have a peek at your profile. I forgot about the chains and duct tape! I remembered it as a fantasy but didn't realize you'd actually included it in a dating profile. Oh Lordy, I'm still hoping for your upscale holler guy.

The formal dinner went fine. The location and the accoutrements were formal but the people were just lovely, warm and kind and funny. His department is truly familial and all show respect and love for each other, and were very nice to me.

He was MC, in his tux, and had to keep hopping up and down to introduce the next speaker. And he did a charming introduction for her (outstanding retiring colleague, a woman, who has had a dazzling career, much of it about Latin American women, bravo!) and friends and former students and colleagues talked too. The young poet I've become pals with was there and I got to meet his lovely wife. The rest was a spinning blur of people slipping in and out of Spanish and lovely wine, great food, and the most beautiful (and historic) room in town as the setting.

We were at "Table #1" up front and I wondered how that would feel, but it was nice. People seemed very curious about me but nobody looked disapproving at all. (I was wondering whether they'd judge him for getting involved less than a year after he lost his wife.) He openly held my hand and when they asked how we met, I deferred to him and he started talking about the restaurant. His brash colleague on my right said, But yes, but how did you meet at FIRST? LOL. So M fessed up that we "met" online, and told them his late wife had told him more than once, "don't be alone." I actually felt fine, not really awkward, glad to be there with him and them. It felt good that he so openly showed that we're a couple and looked so happy.

During the day though, I LOATHED the getting ready. Partial "up-do" at the hair salon looked fine was was so tediou$ to have done, new fancy $hoes, pantyho$e, etc. But I have to admit my outfit (borrowed very glam flowy pants, old but beautiful quilted top, my own quiet jewelry) looked just fine. People did laugh when I seized a wandering insect off the carpet and carried it outdoors. As usual, I had the deepest talk with one of the caterers.

I was feeling pretty airy as he drove me home, and then got all sad. Because he can't stay off the subject of my D. He has a picnic at a winery all planned for tomorrow and I was so looking forward to it, but once he started saying he'd really like a very long talk, and he needs to understand the D story better, and what was the timeline with her estrangement, etc etc. And my heart just sank. It's so painful to narrate it. I even printed out my two "Mothering Again" threads here and re-read them, and all that old misery.... Not feeling it again the way I did at the time, but just feeling "heavy" about the necessity to help him understand it.

I KNOW he adores his family and can't comprehend this. But it'll be really really hard to re-live it through trying to explain it to him. I would rather he let it come out naturally over time.

I felt better after I had the thought: I can explain as much as I want and put a boundary around the rest. Or do it in small installments so as to not weigh down my own spirit. Or even ask, "Can you tell me why a more detailed timeline about her will be helpful for you?" It almost felt like an intrusive question until I remembered how he talks about his own people, like history, with timelines. But as soon as I had the thought that I could turn this back to him, more or less, by asking what is driving his questions, I instantly felt stronger. Vulnerable place.

So I'll cope, and tomorrow will probably be lovely. Nice weather and the winery views are ridiculously gorgeous. Pooch gets to go too, so I gotta get up in the a.m. and give her stanky self a bath.

Night, all.
Love,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on April 07, 2019, 11:40:29 AM
Hops, it's always hard to tell the story of something that broke our hearts. But I suspect, that this will be a healing telling. Just go at your own pace... don't map it out... and give him time to compassionately feedback to you. Tell it naturally. It's perfectly understood, that not everything will come out the first time you tell the story. And it won't be a linear progression per se either - because you'll be touching on some still sore areas - and that will be A-OK.

Dollars to doughnuts, he'll reach out and comfort you.

Fret not dear. The fact he asked to hear it, in the first place, isn't that he doesn't understand how these things happen in families... My guess is, he already senses how painful it still is and he CARES.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 07, 2019, 12:05:56 PM
Gotta go shortly so in a rush...THANKS, Amber.

He does care! No question. But he also has a relentless
mind (appetite for inquiry) and given his powerful career,
perhaps not much sense of his own limits. He has teased
out Islam's deepest roots in the western world as a major
cause of present tribal ills even to today, to much reknown.

So he's approaching my D situation with a similar deep deep
interest in details and timelines, as though as an historian,
he'll get an answer. And I just don't wanna relive all this.

I'll try. With boundaries. I did email him that his probing had
awakened the anguish monster, and he was sorry it had. But
I think this may be a difficult thing to navigate.

The love is there, so I'm hopeful we'll navigate it okay. But
family estrangement just Does Not Compute to him, who is
passionate about family all the way back! So...he's pressing
and keeps telling me (again) how sad it makes him.

I honestly wish he wouldn't. Once I said, "I cannot carry your
grief about my grief. It's too much." And a few days later, he
says it again.

I think my challenge is to learn not to try to fix his sadness
by excavating more "research information" for him. He is
driven by that kind of approach, I think.

Off to winery! Clean Pooch!

xxxxoooo
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on April 07, 2019, 02:47:38 PM
Aww, Hops.  He's a kind, good man who really seems to....

seems to.....

::dropping head::

want to HELP you solve this dd problem... I think?

If he wants to understand, then he'll have to learn about personality disorders, the nonsensical nature of these things, and how PD individuals sometimes (often IME) sabotage themselves along with those closest to them.  That's never going to make sense.... no matter how you tell it, IME.

I'd ask M why he wants to know the details.  Maybe his answer will guide the answers you provide?

From here, there's a linear story, and trying to tell it would lead down painful rabbit holes that go way off track, and are confusing, perhaps, for both you and M.

I suggest writing out the pieces, in the order you want M to hear, to help him understand the situation.  Depending on what he says he needs to understand about it, writing it out might be a healing process that helps him understand, while helping you remain as level as possible.

You can include websites with information about PDs.

Your painful journey, understood clearly, and quickly, is something that could bring you and M closer, IMO. 

If the thread of truth meanders, or he misunderstands, or God forbid makes you feel judged..... that would be a direction to avoid.

I very clearly so both POV.  I didn't have experience with PDs, and truly didn't understand until I experienced it first hand.

The ignorance isn't willful, or meant to harm, but it can, and that feels bad.  I really want M to understand, with economy of motion, while avoiding your most tender spots, or making you in any way feel misunderstood (defensive) which is demoralizing, and my rule has been to NOT discuss these things with people who aren't capable of "getting it."

I don't know if he can understand, but talking to him about it before trying to explain is an imperative, I think.

Maybe providing a few articles about PDs that can help frame your story before you share.

Definitely consider writing it out, and providing it to him.  You can write, read, sort, and re write in your own time, carefully considering the pieces, and putting them together in the most helpful way.  It might help a layer deeper. At least I very much hope so. 

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 07, 2019, 07:08:31 PM
Thanks, (((((Lighter)))) --

In a way, though, for me writing it IS reliving it.
I did print out my two threads on mothering again from here, and re-read them through last. SO much anguish spilled and healed here, I cannot tell y'all.

But today, our magical afternoon really was that. It was hard but since we had a 45-min. drive, and he wanted to know in a chronological way, I narrated through the first half of her life (and my two marriages) -- the outline of when, where we lived, etc. -- taking her own life up to the death of her Dad at her age 19. That's kind of First Half.

When I go for dinner on Wednesday, I promised him the Second Half. Bit in two that way, it's not so bad. In a funny way it does help to go chronologically, not just because timelines are his comfort zone, but because I know I'm now halfway through it! I don't think he understands much about PDs or mental illness, but I've referenced both. I also sent him links to Joshua Coleman's work and a huge review article on estrangement that covers what research there is. Ironically, Dr. Coleman is in SF so if I do move to Sonoma, we'll go visit him together!

I think it'll be okay. Today really was gorgeous and fun and relaxing. We talked and talked and he brought a ridiculously lavish picnic and we did a tasting and bought a bottle of rose and stared at the mountains and wandered around the vinyard with Pooch. There is no more beautiful place in spring.

Back to his house, bit o' cuddling, and by the time I get home he's already emailed me again that he's "crazy, mad" in love with me. He is already hinting at "the rest of his life" with me, and you know, I am feeling it too. We'll see! No rush!!

And when we were on the big porch at the winery his sister called from Costa Rica (I kind of wondered at the timing) and she wanted to talk to me and was SO KIND. Told me how thrilled the whole family is for him and how he told them I've brought him back to life. (He had sunk into a really sad sad dark place after she died.)

One thing I'm stunned by is that there are HORDES of people in his life who are his family or clearly consider him family and so far I've felt nothing but welcome. And a grandbaby in SF on the way!

He's also going to take me to Cuba, where his great aunt lived. We can go there from Costa Rica. I have always wanted to go there!

This is ri di cu lous.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on April 08, 2019, 07:45:24 AM
Well that's a relief, Hops.  Sounds like everything's working out. 

I couldn't be happier for you. 

CUBA! 

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on April 08, 2019, 08:08:41 AM
Oh. My. Goodness!

This sounds like a fairy-tale come true Hops. And JUST what the "doctor ordered" for ya!

Do me one favor, though. Stay anchored in "Hop's world" for a just a bit. Your life, still has purpose and meaning, on it's own. I have no worries about this, with you. Just a reminder to take your time about falling head first into an "us". Remember to breathe, in between meetings and emails.

I do understand the time factor; it was something that Mike and I went through. But, it turned out just fine (even though I'm still trying to convince Hol of that, in some aspects; there were parts of him that she saw me "caving" to... that she didn't think were "really me". Maybe she's right. I'm not sure I need to know that, one way or another, right now.)
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on April 08, 2019, 09:01:20 AM
Gently echoing Amber here.

Stay anchored in your world, Hops.

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 08, 2019, 04:07:53 PM
Yup, yup.
Still gotta do my taxes.
Still take comfort in coming home to my messy solitude.

One step at a time, despite the exciting announcements.

Thanks, guys...important reminder! I still feel the earth beneath my sensible shoes, but I'm glad you're watching!

xxxxxxxooooooo
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on April 09, 2019, 06:08:08 AM
This is so lovely to read, Hops.  I'm glad his lovely, extended family and work network are welcoming you in to their fold - as they should be!  A lovely addition to the group :)  The situation with your D is difficult; I can understand him wanting to know more and understand (as this is such a huge part of your life) but equally understand your reluctance and worry over pulling those wounds out again.  But you are able to put the breaks on when necessary and I know you will feel you can tell him "Not today.  It's too much".  And I think he will understand, he sounds like the sort of person who hears what people say and that's quite rare.

I loved what you said about having a deep conversation with the caterer at the formal event :)  I did lots of waitressing jobs when I was younger, always at very posh do's, either corporate events or weddings, fancy christenings and so on.  There is always someone (they've usually snuck off for a fag) who ends up chatting to the staff and having their own little party separate to everyone else!  I loved it, always really interesting people and I've always felt you can tell a lot about a person by the way they treat waitresses, cleaning ladies, bin men, road sweepers and so on.  It sounds like a lovely evening (although I can identify with the faff of getting ready for it :) ).

It sounds lovely - fun, excitement, travel, adventure, and interesting conversations and new people to meet.  Aw.  I'm really happy for you xx xx xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 09, 2019, 11:14:03 AM
Talked to my T yesterday about how painful it is to answer his questions about D. She said, it was not just grief you healed from, it was deep trauma. I haven't been using that word inside my own mind, but it does make sense. I recall one parent on a forum said complete rejection from an estranged adult child feels like a combination of death, divorce and murder. That rang true.

I DID heal from it. But to be truly intimate with M, I do understand the necessity of telling it. Because he would interrupt me at moments or go on brief tangents, it was difficult to tell him Part One. I got through it and was relieved afterward, but still felt that while he does care, he also is pretty cerebral about it. Being analytical, rather than fully comprehending what it costs me to talk about it.

So I just told him. Wrote him a long email about what my T had said, and spelled out unmistakably how deep and complex is the healed wound he is probling. And how I am willing and recognize the importance of re-lancing the wound to tell the story, I need to ask him to sit with me first for an hour next time I see him (before he bounces around happily concocting dinner, pouring wine, talking nonstop about friends and scholarship) and just listen.

It's tough to draw this boundary but for my own peace of mind, I needed to. Each time he has suddenly talked about how sad HE feels about my loss of my D, it's like a pick, poking into the sorest part of my being. He truly does not want to cause me fresh pain. But I felt I needed to tell him the truth. He does, when he's casual about commenting about it.

One thing I noticed when my dearest, oldest friends were visiting for an overnight last week. Even THEY asked, "Have you heard from D?" It astonishes me. They even knew her, when we lived in another state. They knew my second husband. They once remonstrated with her about the way she was talking to me (contempt). They watched her (and our relationship) deteriorate. They know I haven't heard from her in seven years. Yet, still asked the question. And, the pick went in.

I think it must be rare enough that even the kindest people, people who love you, people who normally display empathy, will just comment, or ask questions, that are really painful to hear. I don't blame them. I don't feel anger. It just amazes me. (I told them the truth: it is over. My relationship with my D is over. We could start a new relationship one day, if she wants it. But the old one is over. Not my love for her, which will never change. But there is no relationship.)

I hope and pray M will eventually come to understand this too. It's not unfinished business. I have finished all I know to do.

Thanks for listening,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 09, 2019, 03:05:12 PM
And thank you, (((((((Tupp))))))!

In my rush to post today I missed seeing your latest. You're right, I can say No to his queries. I hope he learns in time to have the EQ not to bring it up without maybe gently checking, like, is this an okay time to ask you something about your D? If he approached it that way, I'd have a chance to take a deep breath and ready myself and I'll bet 90% of the time I'd say Yes! But though he's a sensitive person, I don't know yet if he's THAT sensitive.

Still, I love him for who he is and it's 90% pure happiness at the mo'.

I really am touched by y'all's vicarious happiness for me. It's so generous.

How is it that blundering into an internet forum (thank you, Doc G!), I found some of the best people anywhere?????

xxoo
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on April 11, 2019, 02:56:15 PM
 (((Hops)))
Your voice sounds quite clear around boundaries, what's finished, what's possible, and your understanding of these painful pieces.

 I hope M understands without too much struggle.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 11, 2019, 03:04:35 PM
Thanks, Lighter. I appreciate it.

And to my great relief, last night (Part Two) went well. He really listened. (Well, first babbled about scholars a bit, but then settled in and really heard me.) He also understands that I won't want to talk about it casually or frequently.

And one amazing outcome was that despite his kind of "I the professor understand all things" sometime demeanor...he opened up and became vulnerable himself, sharing a lot of stuff about his first marriage. He even said hearing my thought that my D gained a sense of power (when she felt utterly collapsed in her life and with no control at all over anything) from discovering how it felt to reject me (sad but true)... suddenly made him understand something about his ex, who continues to resent and be punitive toward him, even though they haven't seen each other in 20 years.

It was hard but worth doing, and afterward we had our usual wonderful time. Dinner, talking talking talking, and feeling mutual wonder at our good luck in finding each other. It's still amazing. And I'm still very happy about it!

love
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on April 21, 2019, 09:09:56 PM
Hi, Hops.

Update please?

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 22, 2019, 07:14:01 PM
Still joyful, happy and deeply grateful.
We are in sync, talking about the future,
mulling over options and scenarios.

It's hard to believe it's been just three months,
he so feels like part of me. He feels the same.

I am moving from stunned to ... inner peace.
He is the person who came along when I needed
My Person, and warts and all (on both ends), we fit.

So far it remains true and I'm really happy about it.

He writes me ridiculously romantic emails and continues
to cook gourmet dinners for me twice a week. His obsession
with Great Food is one reason he's too heavy, but it's a pleasant
problem for me. Long term, I'll be concerned about his health,
but other than offering a quiet example as I make and often bring
what I call Industrial Salads, that's all I want to do.

There is a deep emotional connection and affinity between us
that is really astonishing and moving. He has two more years
of being a professor to go, so we're doing everything from looking
at listings of houses in Sonoma to reconsidering staying here, living
together in his big house while I rent out mine... and who knows
what else. Lots of travel ideas too (he's invited to lecture in Beijing)....

It's just ri di cu lous and despite various fears of change, I'm happy!

xxoo
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on April 22, 2019, 09:48:29 PM
Wowsers, Hops... that's some update. 

And, it feels like 2 weeks to me! 
Three months?!?
 Holy cow!  That's a relationship!

::nod::.

You're in a wonderful relationship, HOPS!

::jumping up and down::.

This is so different.  So joyful.  So relaxed, and comfortable! 

I couldn't be happier for you... not at all. 

Thanks for checking in.

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 23, 2019, 10:43:45 PM
Just so you know how serious this is...
he's interested in joining my exercise class
and asked what to wear, since he has sweats
or jeans or a tutu...

I picked the tutu. And we've been writing ridiculous
emails to each other all evening.

Turns out, for some weird academic insanity reason
he DOES have a tutu...two! Both a green and a gray one,
that match his Georgetown Crew cap (he must've been
a sponsor). So now he's threatening to wear it and I'm
egging him on.

He is, ummm, quite adipose. So, you can imagine......

 :lol: :lol: :lol:

xo
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on April 24, 2019, 08:29:09 AM
That's GOT to feel pretty dang good Hops. Best wishes for fun, gratitude, sharing and togetherness as you go forward.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on April 24, 2019, 08:35:21 AM
Hops, that is so lovely.  That sense of fun and silliness is what is missing from a lot of relationships, I feel.  To be in that situation where you can have a daft joke but also deep and intelligent conversations, know when to joke and when not to - to be secure enough in your self to wear a tutu (and he has a choice of colours!  I love him :) ).  Wow, so lovely to read xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on April 24, 2019, 01:19:35 PM
Oh, the joy of watching chubby little bodies thunk across the floor in tutus.

::nodding::.

I vote he wears the green one.

::nodding::.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 01, 2019, 03:03:38 PM
And on we go....
very happy Bday in the nearest large city.
Wandered the wonderful turn-o'-century neighborhood with its fabulous restored homes, ate at a Cuban lunchery I'd looked up (he has Cuban roots too, the heritage is insane--Costa Rican, Manhattan, Spain, Cuba, Ireland...fascinating muttage). And he looks 100% Irish so it's funny when he bursts into Spanish all the time with his colleagues or on the phone. Drank beer, talked, laughed, wandered, got silly, toured a condo open house for the hell of it, patted a huge Malinois who was mellow as a St. Bernard (uncharacteristically)...drove home the pretty way that adds 10 minutes in exchange for often being the only vehicle on long stretches of tree canopied road, fields each side. I'll never understand why people forgo that drive for the bland interstate, but suits me they do!

We're waking slowly from the honeymoon-feelings torpor but working our way through things pretty well, communication is good. A few sticky points (he keeps mentioning my D in a tragic tone and I have asked him to stop bringing it up more than once) -- but nothing we can't work our way through.

And we have building anticipation about our trip to Paris (then me to Oslo and him to Jerusalem to lecture for a week, then Istanbul...but he's cutting out the Madrid leg because he says he'd rather come back to be with me). Turns out he'd told himself this sweeping trip would be a kind of funereal tour because he was in such grief, and was beginning to think his life was over (at 72!). Now that we're together he's got a different mindset.

I found a dog sitter who's solid as the earth which is a great load off my mind. She radiates calm and responsibility and I'm so relieved she'll be here with Pooch, whom I've never left for so long.

The where-to-live question does loom and I want to drag it out but pretty much think it's inevitable that I'll need to move into his house. Even though I loathe wealthy white enclaves it is a pretty space, right on a lake, and only 10 minutes farther from downtown than I am now. It'll be emotionally very hard to leave my sweet home, but given that mine's too small for two (and he has generations of family Stuff, sigh) and I'll have two rooms of my own at his (a bedroom and study), it is just not rational to resist the logic of it. He's still looking at sweet properties in the Bay Area but as far as I can tell, we're seeing home base as here, and long visits out there...as our solution. He sounds happy about it (staying here near his friends where he's been for 20 years, and before than in DC which isn't far)...and maybe having a house or condo out where his sons are will increase his feelings of freedom and security -- and he says it'll be a smart investment regardless.

Makes sense. I don't know if it'll be this fall or next fall, but I need to get ready to rent mine out at some point. Don't have to make the decision or the move in any rush, though. We already are together 3 times/week on average, sometimes more.

So far, so good! And I am still very very grateful.

xxoo
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on May 01, 2019, 11:30:27 PM
Lots of gratitude there, Hops. 

Glad the birthday was nice.   

I'm sorry you aren't excited about moving into his home.  Having 2 rooms designated for your sole use is better a positive, IMO.  I hope your comfort level increases.  You need to be happy with the plans too.  Don't settle for something you can't be happy with.   

I'm excited about the travel.  Excited about his ability to reframe his life, and views.  Hurrying home to you, rather than completing his planned funereal tour, is a wonderful thing. 

Finding a good dog sitter takes the stress off that piece.  Good job.  You don't want to worry about pooch while you're away.

I have compassion for his inability to understand the situation with your dd.  He doesn't get it.  He can't.  It won't compute for him.  He needs it to, so he continues looping back, even though you asked him not to.  I have compassion for you, and for him
in that.  I don't know how you help him. 

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on May 02, 2019, 08:36:11 AM
Hops, the only thing I can suggest about the DD topic - is to tell him flat out, that spending time thinking/talking about the topic upsets you and is painful to the point that you're in danger of recycling into the past and all those emotions and not enjoying yourself in the here & now. That even tho you KNOW this isn't perfect or even what you want, it is, WHAT IS - for now.

And then, when he brings the topic up in passing - ignore it. Move on to another topic. He'll remember with enough practice, even if it's not something possible in HIS lexicon of experience.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on May 02, 2019, 09:22:04 AM
That's such a lovely update, Hops, I'm glad you're having such a good time and there's so much going on.  I can understand the wrench of leaving your place at some point but renting it out rather than selling it makes good sense and I suspect that Mr Tutu will be very open to any decorating/re-arranging suggestions you have at your new mutual home.  And will the rent money give you a bit of an income or will it all go on maintaining the property?  Just wondered if it might help your financial situation a little.

Glad pooch has a good dog sitter lined up!  Very necessary to have someone you feel happy with.  And yes, I get the difficulty with talking about D.  I was talking to some other parents of children with disabilities yesterday and we were all saying how hard it is to have to keep explaining our kids' problems to every person we come into contact with.  Not quite the same situation as D, I know, but that having to keep digging deep is just too much.  I think he'll get the hang of it.  Maybe you can train pooch to chuck a ball at him each time he does it :) Lol.

I'm glad it's going so well.  You sound really happy and it just sounds kind of easy.  Which is so lovely.  I'm really chuffed for you xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 09, 2019, 06:47:04 PM
The rent money will be wonderful!
Mr. Tutu's suggestion is that I can use it to fix up this house.
I may squirrel it away out of my depression-era-ish fear of poverty.
Which I know, and YOU know, sucks. But that's tempting, even if
I never live here again. But I could one day, if I outlive him. Which
I don't want to do, simply because I don't want him to grieve.

Yet.
He's also stated that he intends to pay my living expenses once
we are living together. Plus travel. And I believe him. It's ridiculous.
I did insist  on being responsible for my own 2-day visit to Norway,
since he's doing everything else re. Paris. That plus 10 days of dogsitter...$$!                               
In October, we'll go to California to visit  the granddaughter due then.
And it's going to be Costa Rica for Christmas. His brother and sister
are there, and all their kids. 

The thing is, it has sunk in that I have found My Person. And A FAMILY!
He has told me over and over that he wants to spend the rest of his life with me.
And I just say, "I feel the same." I do! I think we'd be smart to live together a
while before formalize it, but we both see marriage as the point, ultimately.

My Person. Not to mention my Pooch's Person! He stuffs her with treats
and then while he's             rubbing her belly gives me a side-eye and
says,   "She's my dog now." We banter and tease about her all the time.
I finally conceded that she is clearly 49% his dog. This is a joyful fantasy
come true. I have fantasized for YEARS about doting on a dog with a beloved
partner,  bantering and teasing together.  And this is happening. It's crazy.

His youngest son arri ves for aweek this weekend and Ican't wait to meet him.

love and thanks fo rlistening! (Cursed spacebar...my laptop's in the shop.)
xxxoooo
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on May 09, 2019, 11:48:24 PM
You've relaxed into this new life, Hops.

It seems right, and good, and worthy of you.

I hope it's all you want it to be, and more.

You deserve to be happy.  '

You deserve family, Hops.

Lighter






 
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on May 10, 2019, 01:26:00 AM
Yes, what Lighter said!

It's really lovely, Hops, not least because you feel comfortable with the things he's suggesting.  You're not getting a sense of him wanting to control or dominate you, or picking up the tab because it makes him feel superior - and you would be picking that up if it were there because you've spent so many years thinking, learning, absorbing and being so honest with yourself that you'd be getting a tingling if there were something else underlying the situation.  But there isn't.  Two very good people who've both been though tough times have found each other and fitted together.  Really does happen.  And Pooch approves!  There is really no other test :) Lol.  I'm genuinely delighted for both of you and very excited about your upcoming trip :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 29, 2019, 12:24:43 AM
Sigh. Not a relationship ender, but the inevitable pink flag. Can't be all honeymoon all the time, so I'm evaluating this.

M is constantly talking and charming and storytelling. He's very dynamic and delightful. He's mostly fascinating and everyone I've introduced him to has enjoyed his company and been enthusiastic about us.

First time I've disliked him for anything happened yesterday. Two female friends were hanging out on my patio with us and he started talking about his first wife, the mother of his children. They had a painful second half (20 year marriage) that ended in one of those dramas wherein she had the house emptied one day when he was at work. I know that shocked and hurt him terribly and always felt so sorry when he'd mention it. But then yesterday, he holds forth about her for 40 minutes in front of two women friends of mine he'd only met once before each...and the way he tells the story I am disturbed and uncomfortable. He goes on about how awful she is, how one of her sons won't even talk to her, and then adds a gleeful anecdote about how his aggressive divorce lawyer advised him to go after half her federal pension. And he's so proud of that.

I suddenly realized that I think he's part of the problem. Not just the victim of a terrible person, although I have no reason to disbelieve that she turned into one over their marriage. He has told me they loved each other at the beginning and for some years were happy. But he clearly blames her for all of it...being very competitive with him, resentful about his career, etc. Yet he also has had overwhelming academic ambition, too. He acknowledged that once privately, when I was expressing compassion for her, and that she may have felt powerless.

Suddenly I thought, she was deeply unhappy, felt unappreciated (she had a good government job and also raised the kids, whom he adores but I wonder how deeply involved he was day to day)....etc. She may have dark characteristics (she is Norwegian and he blames some of it on that culture as though she's from a Bergman movie) and is estranged from her parents, whom he describes as this lovely old couple she's just randomly cruel to. I wondered instantly, could she be an abuse survivor?

He appears to have vigorously taken up the cause of her ancient parents, befriending them and encouraging the kids to be in relationship to them, which she didn't want. I don't know why, but it sounds as though he chose the kids over her and disregarded her wishes. He just states with complete confidence that they are utterly innocent and she is utterly cruel (she blew off a reconciliation visit). It could be true but sounds too simple.

Anyway, I really don't want to get enmeshed in the details of it...but I am aware his sons talk to M constantly about her and her being difficult, and though he says he's just very upset about their "suffering" because of her, I find myself thinking he's unconsciously enabling and feeding off their dislike of her.

It just felt to me that he was a martyred victim, bashing the mother of his sons to entertain two women he didn't even know well, and monopolizing as though we were all dazzled coeds at his brilliant knee.

I
did
not
like
it
at
all.

I wrote him later and expressed that I would feel less uncomfortable if he even said anything acknowledging her worth and dignity as a flawed human being. He wrote rationally but without feeling about her beauty, intelligence and being "personable" and that they'd had a happy early marriage. But then refocused on the ugly end of it and her terribleness. All may be correct, but I think he's not seeing how it might feel as a woman and a feminist woman to have listened to him talk about her that way, especially on a social occasion. I found it inappropriate and was very uncomfortable. Something about maybe trying to make women like you by trashing another woman with just one side of a story really sticks in my craw.

I felt withdrawn from him today and when he called tonight with his usual sweet murmury talk, I didn't feel our usual connection.

It's a difficult moment. We usually can talk through things but this one worries me. In case it's symbolic of some overall lack of empathy or dismissal of opinions or perspectives that don't fit his narrative. (He is always absolute in his confidence about ideas, all that...) I don't THINK so because he's so kind and generous and attentive and crazy about me, all of that...but for the first time, I feel unsure.

Tomorrow night I go there for dinner and we'll talk. I hope to hell we have a serious talk and he doesn't just blow off my thoughts. I do not want to be involved in his boycott or blaming of his ex. He had another --happy-- marriage in between, fer godsake. But I don't want to listen to him bashing her like that any more. It's not sitting right for some gut reason, and I definitely consider it a pink flag.

Thanks for listening,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on May 29, 2019, 12:59:10 AM
Sorry, Hops. 

I don't have enough info to chime in here, but I do know how it feels to need people to understand the true essence of what happened in a relationship where one person manufactures chaos and destruction while others try to limit and heal the chaos. 

You don't know if the ex was abused, or if she's driven her kids away with PD behaviors that are truly impossible to live with.  You don't know if she's been abusive to the kids, for that matter.

I do appreciate the pink flag of someone, anyone blaming everything on the ex.  There's always a part we play, and it's nice when everyone steps up and owns what's theirs, kwim?

Then again..... children suffering, bc of PD behaviors, is a touchy subject for me.  I never understood it.  Can't abide it.  It sort of makes me crazy, and maybe there's a little bit of crazy going on for M on that topic too?  I can see wanting to strike out at her, verbally, and doing so when he's thinking about the kids.  It's upsetting.  People get upset about it.  They SHOULD be upset, IME.  Torture other adults, but don't harm the kids. 

It sounds like you have a charismatic man, who likes attention.  It sounds like he's used to commanding a room, and that it's nice most of the time, but not always.  There will be sweet and sour moments, unfortunately.  No one's perfect.  Everyone deserves the break we'd like to have for ourselves.  Love is about embracing everything... the negative qualities as well as the positive ones.  We can't have just the lovely aspects of a partner, and they get our whole package too.

Again, I'm sorry the first flag is waving, but encouraged you're communicating.  Working on feeling better about it seems like a good idea. 

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on May 29, 2019, 01:45:28 AM
You are a wise and sensible woman, Hops, and you and M will have a proper conversation about this, I'm sure.  My thoughts, for what they're worth -

You have no fear about bringing this up with him - that's a good sign.

If this incident indicated a generalised attitude towards women/other people/his own sense of self importance/abuse etc - I think you would have seen it long before now.

I think abuse and abusive relationships are always difficult and can be seen from different angles - in many cases there isn't a clear right and wrong.  Many people describe my mum as a lovely lady - she's always been lovely to others because it's part of the way she gaslights and convinces people I'm nuts and making everything up.  Relationships from years ago change in people's minds over time; we all forget things or even start to see things differently as we learn more in life.  It might be that he's stuck on some aspect of this (I'm blown away sometimes when I realise I've still got a nugget in me over a chance remark some bloke made to me thirty years ago - sometimes we just don't realise).  This might be his flaw or achilles heel, that part of him that isn't great, glossy, fun, uplifting - we all have those.  But I think the important thing is that you are both able to talk freely about this and separate out what happened many years ago from how things are now.

It's good that you're assertive enough to pick up on what makes you feel uncomfortable, verbalise it and are confident enough to discuss it with him.  And from what you've said he'll be able to listen and respond, and it strikes me that he'll be honest rather than just telling you what you want to hear?  That's just the sense I've had from what you've told us about him - he seems like an honest guy, rather than a flattering one?

Let us know how it goes.  In a way I think it's a good thing, Hops - there has to be a bit of a reality hit when you start seeing someone, because we've all got our flaws and dark secrets.  I think what's good is that you're both assertive and intelligent enough to discuss things openly and without fear. xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on May 29, 2019, 10:35:56 AM
Ok, this story and the way it was told bothers you Hops. And you're not inflating that to be more than it is, which is also good. So, let him tell the REST of the story about why that came out that way. Maybe that'll change your understanding of why he holds a little bitterness there - or it'll confirm something about him that is difficult to see under his general charisma and charm.

Given the level of discussions that Hol and I have, I've come to see that I still hold a lot of anger about Ex#1 (her dad)... a resignation about the way Ex#2 wouldn't meet me halfway within the relationship... and a little about the subtle ways Michael would stifle me and try to mold me into what he thought I should be. It's still so difficult for me to talk about the things that happened with Ex#1 that despite him living about an hour from here - I will NOT have him visit my house. He's a complex mess of hypocrisy, gaslighting, manipulation and other attributes that I found totally abhorent & horrifying (given my background) that I damn near have a panic attack at the thought that he would just drop in on us unannounced - like he did with Hol out at Steve's. (She was also creeped out by that behavior.)

So yes - when I speak about him I am pretty much 100% negative. Fortunately, I've forgotten so many of the stories and details and have learned how to let the past be the past and not NOW... that I can manage my emotions about it a lot better. Hol's perspective is naturally different than mine - and I acknowledge that difference for her. Just like she's seen with her own eyes, why I might feel the way I do. But he says things about me, that are even much worse than my "warding off the vampire" emotional verbiage STILL. It's been going on for all these years and he's never varied his strange version of the facts.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on May 29, 2019, 03:30:44 PM
Hops:

I have to wonder if M just doesn't know how to use verbal jujitsu to BE HEARD, and not punished, when speaking about PD behaviors.  I remember a thread, or more than one, on this board where I was trying very hard to learn how to DO that.  You were helpful.  You tried to help me DO THAT.  Doc G tried to help me figure it out.  I think CB actually showed me with her own post to the same person I was trying to speak about, and it's a very difficult thing to do!

There's so much confusion,and misunderstanding, and the PDs thrive on it.  The truth tellers get crushed by it, IME.


Sometimes it's that we fail to gage the moment..... speaking about PDs can be like farting on an elevator, IME.   

I wonder why M was talking about it.  Did someone else bring up an ex, or a break up, or something that had him chiming in, OR was he using that story to entertain the troops, and misjudged his audience? 

I have to wonder if he knows you at all, Hops.  How could he not know your radar would go up on that one?

He should be schooled, and I hope you can treat his  misteps as opportunity to educate, rather than get defensive. 

I hope you can remain curious about his story, and the ex, and her parents, and the children in the middle of this debacle. 

Sometimes there's a PD in the middle, manufacturing chaos and confusion.  If M is that PD, then you better to know now, than later, IME. I think a few calm conversations about this will give you plenty of answers.


Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 29, 2019, 05:15:37 PM
Thanks so much all...I'm so grateful for YOU!!!
Will be quick now as I have to leave shortly (more later) but in brief:

Tupp--your reassurance that I can do this, communicate maturely, is huge. MWAH! Thank you. You always remind me I am more adult than I realize I am. Whew.

Skep--Yes, I get it why you don't allow the ex. I think M has residual hurt and anger, and his refusal to engage w/her makes sense. Just not sure what he's doing w/his kids, the older of whom does want his kids to see her and wants to maintain connection. I also think M has a big ego and competitive drive, which brought him huge success but may have soured their love. His crowing about taking half her pension doesn't sit well. With Real Money at stake their divorce battle must've been bloody. But...ugh. I'm a woman chronically stressed by unequal pay, so it was hard not to feel for her. He said she's fine now, living in a nice house. Just to rattle the branch, I might ask innocently, "Since you don't need it, ever thought of giving back the pension claim?" (No, I won't. But it's tempting!)

Lighter--I don't yet know whether M's ex is PD. Sometimes I'm unsure whether behavior that looks toxic is PD, or is trauma survivor attempts at self defense. Your thoughts make me think, though...and that's the best help. Thank you.

All--I will do my best to find clarity whether it all comes tonight or not. May need to not dig it vigorously all at once, but I'm feeling calmer about it and sense that more insight will come in time. I'm no longer reacting with recoil or anger but will know better how I feel about it once I'm with him again, in an hour.

THANKS for your support, I go forth with wise Amazons at my back!

love, muchly--
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 30, 2019, 07:55:32 AM
Morning, Amazons.
Thank you again so much for those messages...soooo helpful.

Talk at M's went okay. I don't think he fully grasped the thing I was trying to convey about how it felt to me to have him holding forth about his ex that way in front of my friends. He said "I don't care if it's not a good look, I was telling the truth!" But he told me a lot more about her, more incidents that did sound strange, hostile, and dramatic. He is very dramatic himself (has told me before he's a "drama queen") but one in particular was memorable. She asked him for a ride into Georgetown one day (they lived outside DC) and wouldn't specify why, so he dropped her off. Later that day he got a call from the hospital, a nurse saying "Your wife is ready to go home" -- she'd had a full facelift without telling him, but didn't arrange her transportation home, so he was rushing to the hospital all freaked out, etc. It was upsetting to him in a big way. They arranged for her to spend one night but to learn about it there, with her all bandaged...was freaky for him. I couldn't think of anything but, She got your attention.

Anyway, with that I felt I'd heard enough. They had a totally toxic, no connection breakdown of their relationship. I do think some of it had to do with his complete focus on ambition and her way of reacting was unhealthy and awful. It sounds as though she did escalate and use a lot of passive-aggressive surprises (facelift, house emptying) and something was very wrong with her. And he wasn't tuned into her at all. Miserable for her, between them, and he was plowing ahead. Ugh.

But I also connected more with understanding that he really was hurt and shocked by the end of it. He has clearly never fully gotten over it and really doesn't want to see her. He said, Well you can meet her at some birthday party, and I could walk over and say, Marete, I'm sorry for everything that happened to you. But every time anyone tries anything conciliatory toward her, he said it gets turned back around in their faces.

I understood better what he's dealing with. Or not dealing with. And I don't think he feels okay about it and tries to manage it through listening to the kids complain about her. (And venting to strange women he's just met.) I told him I thought it'd be a lot healthier if the kids, who are adult men in their 30s, dealt with their Mom stuff with therapists, because talking to him about it so much isn't good for them since he can't give them what a therapist could, imo. Then I just let it go.

It was a tough talk (Pooch was agitated and a good buffer -- "mommy and daddy aren't fighting, we're talking" and tuning in and laughing with/about her helped us reconnect). But we got into a better space.

Weird. Relationships. Trust. And especially for me -- closeness v. recoil. I have to manage my own feelings so I don't over-react, too. The whole thing affected me.

But it's a beautiful day, we'll see each other at exercise class shortly and I work this afternoon. Friday I'll go swim at his place and then we'll eat downtown. I think we're going to work through this. And one good thing was we did talk well. No big argument, but a difficult conversation. It's pretty complicated and I will be well off to stay out of their old stuff, I think.

love
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on May 30, 2019, 09:51:38 AM
Since I'm currently experiencing my own "close encounter with extreme unpleasantness from the past"... a couple things, from how I'm trying to thread a path to beyond it.

1. It still feels just as awful, threatening, whirlwindy, steamrolling as it did initially. Every.Single.Contact. That's my problem and I have better coping mechanisms that I engage immediately. It doesn't make the feeling go away; it just allows me to bear it until it subsides.

2. It's not my job to respond anymore to the catalyst that sets that off in me. (Merely, take care of myself.) NO has been said loud and clear, I'm not changing my mind, and I MUST - for my own good - absolve myself from blame & responsibility for any choices or consequences that I don't control that arise from it in the future from that NO. I'm fully free to choose "NO", and I don't have to explain why to ANYONE.

3. There is a very dangerous, volatile and unpredictable anger underlying the fear, confusion, and frustration and horror on the surface of my feelings. Venting that, analyzing while in this state, all lead to higher probability of conflagration. When I'm not feeling this way - is when I can make rational choices and gain insights.

4. I'm well aware my reaction would appear to be out of proportion to actual facts here. I'm owning that; and the experience that's contributed to the feeling that has a life of it's own. But that's how certain I am that I won't touch anything about the situation or this person, with a 10 foot pole.

My previous "no" was apparently not taken seriously or even heard. Fortunately, there are others who a) feel the same way and b) we are united in our response. 

Communication isn't possible when you're not actually heard or your feelings accepted as legitimate under the circumstances.

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on May 30, 2019, 10:18:30 AM
Hops:

I'm sorry you didn't completely clear the air with M, bc he'd do well to fully understand your feelings in this matter, IMO.  Baby steps.

That said, it's hopeful you could talk, and not argue.

As long as you don't feel you're being herded into NOT having a dissenting opinion, into NOT being able to raise concerns, into NOT speaking your mind, even when it's not easy for M..... I think you're surf'n real good: )

Trauma bonding is a slow creeping thing, IME.

Amber, I was told that feelings, like you're experiencing recently.....
the in your face HERE AND NOW FEELINGS are best dealt with through somatic T.  I can say that the little Somatic T I did helped a good deal. 

Truth be told, I hate that those negative feelings have any power over you at all.  The same with my stuff.... I hate losing another minute to them.

I think it would be better if those powerful reactions and feelings could be banished, instead of endured.  I don't want to simply endure.  I want to notice when they're absent, and feel gratitude that they're gone, or at least lessened, which is where I am now.  I don't go out the door every morning with my guard up, and it's a revelation I hardly notice anymore.  Not that I'm out of the woods, bc I'm not.  I just have more distance, and I needed help to do that.   

lighter



Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on May 30, 2019, 11:09:12 AM
Most of the time, I do have that distance and can stay centered in objectivity more than emotion. But due to some "piling on" the past few weeks... I was vulnerable because of the timing.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on May 30, 2019, 11:11:42 AM
You do have a lot on your plate, Amber.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on May 30, 2019, 12:03:10 PM
I think the fact that you're able to talk about it without fear, or an argument, or someone walking out or slamming doors, is the key thing, Hops, and I'm glad you've been able to chat it through.

I know I have my own hang ups, triggers, over reactions, under reactions and so on.  We are what we are, warts, bad experiences, bits we still aren't ready to deal with yet and we all have that, whether we know it or not.  I think the honesty and openness you both have is amazing and I love that he is real with you - he didn't pretend it was anything other than what it is, or has been.  I think this is a good blip to get through (and there had to be something, what with tutu twirling and whisking you off to Paris, something in there had to be a bit grainy! lol).  I'm glad you've talked it through and got it all out in the open xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Meh on May 31, 2019, 11:44:10 PM
Wow Hops a full facelift without telling him.  (some cliche saying here about how we all have an inch of dirt in our bags??    :)   At least you have the balls to try a relationship.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 08, 2019, 09:53:28 PM
Well I'm hangin in, Boat, but it's not as swimmingly smooth as it was.

That's okay. Honeymoon feelings only last so long.

He went into a needy clutchy anxious spiral and my reaction was withdrawal
and we've spent a week trying to reconnect and get up out of it in a healthy
way. But I've seen the other side of all this romanticism.

Difficult but not impossible, and I still think he's my person. I'm just resisting
enmeshment that he thinks is flattering and I find claustrophobic.

I've been alone a LONG time and he hasn't been alone a full year. I realize we're in pretty different spaces as far as autonomy goes, and I'm fierce when someone messes with it.

All in all, though, I'd say we continue to communicate earnestly and fairly well. Once he stops interrupting, that is.

He basically proposed tonight in an off-hand way. I just calmly said, since it's so early, how about we talk about it every couple of months? And he didn't argue.

Oh lordy.

xxoo
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on June 09, 2019, 12:21:41 AM
I think you're right to protect your autonomy, Hops.  It takes a lot of hard work to be in a comfortable place with being alone, and to build up a work base, community base, friendship base and so on.  So very important to hold on to that and keep that element of separateness, I think.  Interestingly, I have only two friends who have relationships that to me seem healthy.  They've both maintained their own lives rather than becoming one unit.  They love each other, obviously, and do things together, but also have each kept their own careers, friends, hobbies etc.  I think it's healthier and more realistic.

And the honeymoon period - sigh!  So lovely, but has to settle into something else at some point.  And hopefully it will settle into something comfortable yet still fun (minus the interruptions :) ).  It's a rocky path, Hops!  But I'm very glad you have your hiking boots on and are following it :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on June 09, 2019, 10:23:17 AM
It's OK for him to NEEEED you the way he needs you, and it's OK for you to put boundaries in place and protect them.

Once you give up autonomy, it's gone, Hops.  I agree with Tupp.  Don't let it go.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on June 09, 2019, 10:38:07 AM
Hmmm. Yes Hops, I like your idea of revisiting a formal commitment every few months for the time being. You both are still acquiring and digesting information about each other. Trying it on for fit and comfort. That makes absolute sense, even while you're noticing a shift from the honeymoon phase to a deeper level of intimacy. Wait and see how the new level fits and feels. All while still having fun and enjoying each other - and possibly extending the honeymoon phase in other ways.

My update referencing the jumble of old and new while in a period of change might have some clues for ya. I think the older we get, the more intimidating change seems - especially when it involves a commitment somewhere in it. And some of us lose our patience easier with drama over the years too. I spend a lot of time, mentally reducing what seems like complex situations into as simple an equation or choice as I can. Hol thinks that's kinda silly and pointless... but getting down to brass tacks has always served me well. She can get hung up sometimes in the "he said/she said". I jealously guard the process of getting to "simple" and my conclusions too. But I still like to bounce it off other people's perception for what I might not be seeing. 2nd opinions always show me something I didn't assess correctly or understand or just dismissed. But my own conclusions - so often denied me - and my way of getting there, ARE one expression of my autonomy. You bet your bippy I clutch it. (Sometimes it's justified; sometimes it's not.) It's just another way of experiencing boundaries for me.

Re: enmeshment...

every couple needs to negotiate where the line of "being one couple voluntarily" and "enmeshment" encroaches on autonomy is... and it may be the kind of thing that is always in flux, 24 hrs a day. But that's based on my own experience (so far) and is to be taken with a large grain of salt. You have needs; he has needs; sometimes they might conflict... sometimes they are perfectly compatible... and sometimes, one or the other needs to step up and sacrifice a bit for the other. (no point by point scorekeeping allowed! Just big picture balance of giving and receiving, and yes - situations in the present can impact that.)

I *think* (for now) that once you've seen what enmeshment IS, it's not possible for you to blindly walk into that situation again. The repetitions that seem to be a pattern for some people, come with that particular set of blinders... of craving for the "old normal" of the devil we know. So you CAN trust yourself to see, feel, think all the things required to maintain your autonomic boundaries now. You have definitely seen what enmeshment IS, how it occurs, and what the danger signs of "incoming" are. It's unpleasant to encounter it to any degree... but if it can be honestly discussed and negotiated it doesn't have to be an ongoing problem.

It's definitely something that Mike & I were always trying to sort out. Not always comfortably either - but throughout the process we both understood the bottom line: we had each other's backs no matter WHAT else was going on or who we, as individuals, were. That kind of loyalty seems to be getting rare in this day and age... but it ranks right up there on my need list. And it's something I know how to give, too. I understand completely that other people are different and have other needs. It's not even easy to see what those things are, all the time, in ourselves. My tendency to see it negatively, is to unfairly judge myself as "needy" emotionally. Well, then if that's "needy"... that's my only "needy" spot. I've always been so much more outwardly focused - caretaking others, having many things under control and running smoothly, etc. silly occupational proclivities - that I think, now... I can give myself a pass on this particular "need" I've finally identified, after all the rambling blathering I've done here and other places.

Do you have any ideas what your "one thing" might be yet?
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 09, 2019, 01:12:11 PM
Tupp, that rang so true to me, about the only healthy relationships you know being ones where they maintain a lot of independence. Love and return, go and return.

Lighter, yes, I think so too. I have this sense that once I capitulate over my own resistance (rather than voluntarily releasing it)...that would end it for me, inside.

Amber....
Quote
My tendency to see it negatively,

I got lost and don't know what this "it" referred to, dang me. Important discussion for me at the moment. And thanks for the thinking. Please tell me more.

Everybody--I can describe....something I fear a bit. Because I don't know if I fully understand what's happening.

He has a lot of natural, understandable, unshocking, anxiety that I completely empathize with...about physical intimacy because his cancer operation left him dependent on an injectable aid to function. First time he told me about it, months ago, I immediately told him it didn't matter to me at all, I'd been with two people with those issues (one due to spinal injury, one to cancer) and I truly understood all the aids and accomodations, and it never had any affect on my desire or enjoyment of closeness etc. He was touched and relieved and as we weren't getting right down to business but very affectionate and enjoying our emotional bonding, I didn't obsess.

Same as with R, I set my boundary early by explaining that I favor slowwwwwww, old-school courtship these days and am in zero rush. Looking forward to intimacy but without urgency. He was just fine with that, said my pace was the only pace, he'd never push it, and he completely understood.

Until he didn't. Recently I have felt BADGERED. He was actually physically clutching at me and whining. Whining. Making unsubtle moaning noises at me that sound exactly the way he sounds when devouring fabulous food. Leering, trying to be sexy and suggestive, telling me repeatedly (cannot understate "repeatedly") about his overwhelming desire for me, and then it just went "clunk" inside me.

That is the sound of me turning off. I wound up telling him I was feeling pressured and he goes, oh no, I'm not pressuring you, and I go, yes you are. Can we please just let it rest a while, and give me a chance to catch up with you? I WILL catch up with you and DO look forward to it, but it's been 15 years and I'm easing awake.

Then there was the night I started to stay over, slipped into his spare bedroom as he began snoring, realized I didn't want to be there (he had badgered and begged, stay over stay over), tiptoed out with pooch and as we headed to my sweet l'il home realized I was so GLAD to be out of there. So GLAD he'd fallen asleep. Felt literally like an escape. The room for me was nice but full of her religious books and just wasn't my own space. (All that's okay and he removed them the next day.) But just the feeling was, this isn't quite ready. I'm not quite ready.

M doesn't mean to do this next bit. I think his recent meltdown has been out of his control. But what was feeling like a haven and a nest could begin to feel like a sticky web if he doesn't get a grip. I'm not blaming him, I'm just discovering a layer of him. Deep vulnerability that I can sometimes welcome and sometimes not.

He has an extremely difficult time letting something go. He perseverates. He repeats and repeats and repeats (I have such desire for you). There is no rest from it and it backfires in me retreating. Wanting desperately to fuse, he winds up unintentionally causing more distance. The flood of talk becomes floods of messages and I feel like a flooded engine. (Hmmm, not bad. Need to explain it to him that way.)

Weds I was going to a potluck with covenant group women, greatly looking forward to it. M and I had a tentative plan to watch Handmaid's Tale together afterward but I wanted to leave the evening open...if I wanted to stay late and talk with friends instead I wanted that option. So I told him, I'd like to decide on that when the potluck ends, and I'll call you as soon as it does and let you know either way. He emailed, texted, emailed again and emailed AGAIN to tell me he so wanted me to come. I'd seen him three times in recent days and was looking forward to the serenity and close conversation with my women friends. Then maybe a night alone.

With every reply, I gently and sweetly repeated, "I'll call you right after it and let you know either way." Yet over and over....he tells me what he wants. AGAIN. Later I did go and it was fine. We had a nice time watching it together. But I had been frustrated about his repeated messages. Turned out he'd had a horrible day emotionally, virtual panic attacks about me withdrawing, so he was clutching.

It reached peak struggle before I actually felt angry with him. I woke up to a yearning, moany voicemail about please please please call me, so I did, and somehow his voice and endless repeated explanations about what he wants just set me off. I told him his anxiety is overwhelming me and setting off my own and I really want him to see a counselor who can help him manage it, because I can't manage his emotions FOR him. He actually agreed and said he'd be able to get a grip and deal with it. He'd basically had an afternoon-long panic attack. And he IS willing to see a counselor. (I also offered to do it with him if he thought it'd help.)

Last night I got more insight and I think we connected better. At dinner he talked (and talked) about how intense and powerful and passionate and ultimate and earth-shatteringly different the intimacy we already have emotionally and intellectually is for him, etc etc etc, more than with either of his two previous wives, unique, special, ultimate, essential, he wants me for the rest of his life, on and on and on. I get it. But I think he just opened up another layer.

We were talking about the deaths of our parents. He has told me about the long stressful vigil for his father, involving getting both his sons to the family place in CR, the vigil that went on and on as family flew in and out, two weeks each, endless, exhausting. I understood and appreciated this epic kind of story which, unfortunately included a kamikaze arrival of his now-ex (1st), about whom he is still very bitter.

The thing is, before that started, I had started to tell him the simple but important to me story of my own father's death. Not epic, not dramatic, involving only me and him, a quiet guest room, music...and those moments, which were poignant but beautiful. But M interrupted me as I was halfway through, began telling his own, and he was off to the races. I struggled to hold on to his attention so I could complete my own story, but he was on a roll. I decided to release it, completely, and listen well and wholeheartedly. So I did.

He talked nonstop for over an hour. It went from a repeat (with more detail) of the ex's horrible behavior that undermined him, then through his father's death, back again to the ex's sabotaging awfulness, then into his night in a treehouse while he wept and shook in shock that she'd emptied the house and left, then moved forward into the death of his recent ex, a blow by blow of her cancer (pancreatic) and their final trip to Costa Rica for reunion with her grandsons, a difficult and epic journey back home after confirming blood tests in San Jose, how she at one point had to lie down on the floor in the airport, and how he felt responsible for all of it, and then home, and how he arranged for her two sons to come from CR, vigil again, long and terrible, right through to her death and some aftermath.

My heart was with him. I felt tender and consoling. I was glad to know these stories in that much detail. They are pivotal in his life and they matter.

I did tell him I understood exactly what he was saying about the behavior of his ex, but that since we do not know what happened in her childhood, I wanted not to relitigate his divorce from her over and over, but to let it go. I got a good picture of his intense sensitivity and how the family deaths affected him, and how terrible the experience of losing his wife a year ago has been. Loss, loss and loss...and intense fear of any more. (I.e., me. He's not losing me so far but things did change some.)

He said it's a terrible thing to love someone you could lose to death. (I said, we all do.) He really is sensitive and was raised in a culture that demanded men always be in control. I began to sense who he REALLY is, under Mr. Professor.

Anyway, watching tears roll down his face in the restaurant booth, I was moved and understood, and truly comforted him. I listened deeply. I could sense his relief.

Yet there's a part of me that wonders, will I ever get to tell him a story that's important to me the way he just told me those? Will he ever just listen?

So. Autonomy and boundaries and maintaining other close relationships with friends are going to be absolutely essential to me. I think that's always true, you don't buy milk at the hardware store. He doesn't have to fill all my needs. But he has to understand that I can't fill all of his either.

Him managing his own anxiety is critical. I've been around clutchy panicky men before, who are having trouble not making their own vulnerability my entire responsibility....and I know where it leads.

My second husband turned me into his mother. He became infantile at times. I see this risk with M.

Clunk.

Yet. On balance I know he is a very good man. A decent person. Someone who truly wants to share life and would be utterly loyal and kind and genuinely appreciates me. He's less than a year from the trauma of losing his wife, he was completely lost when we met, and I've become his new lodestar. So when I'm not "making progress" fast enough (toward sex) for him, he's gone into a spin about it.

I get it. But the pressure feels dangerous to me, emotionally. I told him I learned later in adulthood that because of my mother it took me a very long time to learn I needed to have boundaries and a separate self, and it's difficult for me to navigate that at times, and that any pressure to attend to someone else's overwhelming emotional need reminds me of dealing with her and triggers anxiety of my own.

He understood. He's a very intelligent man. But lately, he's been very challenging to deal with.

I think we may have come around a corner last night. He stopped badgering, he seemed to feel relief after that long long talk and tears. So I do think it's going to get better. And the good news is I do still love him. (Even find him desirable, always have. Just wanna go slow.)

We'll see. His ruminating and melancholy and obsession with fear of loss...I understand them. And if he gets some support from other people too, especially a counselor, I really do think we'll be okay.

But wowsers. Nitty gritty are us.

Thanks for listening....all. I so appreciate it.

love
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on June 09, 2019, 03:10:22 PM
Well Hops, your perception and level headed approach to the whole situation are very impressive, as is your ability to see the good parts and balance them without making light of what's bothering you or just ignoring it.  There's a female comedian here who jokes about women only being able to hide their PMT from new boyfriends for the first three months.  After that, they can't suppress it, but the boyfriend is in love by then and can't leave :)  It's funny, but there's a lot of truth in it as well - we present a side of ourselves when we first get to know people and slowly the real us comes out.

It does sound as if M has some issues of his own he needs to deal with and it's good that he's willing to see a counsellor.  And I do hope things sort themselves out and start to settle as you've had so many good things to say as well.  But it does all sound very exhausting for you and yes, becoming someone's mum isn't a prospect that anyone relishes (and you're wise to be clear about avoiding that).  Someone calling or texting me frequently would drive me nuts, too - call, leave a message and wait.  I can understand you feeling turned off and pulling away.  I hope he is able to understand that as well, and to slow down a bit with everything.  It would be a great shame for him to lose you because he wants you too much!  So I hope he can start talking things through with someone soon and start to calm down a bit.  Well done to you for keeping a calm head through all of it xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 09, 2019, 03:31:19 PM
Thank you, (((((((((Tupp)))))))).

Your capacity to see the heart of a narrative, understand what's happening and in perspective, just blows me away.

I truly appreciate it. I do think we'll be okay and felt so much better after letting it out here.

love
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Meh on June 10, 2019, 04:45:39 AM
Wow propose. hehe at least you have some romantic drama to talk about and make you feel desired.  But yeah, for those of us who spend time alone and even need alone time to recharge sometimes.... well I don't like the idea of someone being around all the time it's too much.

Congrats whatever you decide. It's cool.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on June 10, 2019, 08:57:37 AM
Busy morning around here Hops. But the "it" I usually see negatively, is my great need for someone at my back, helping protect me... sometimes even from myself. It's something I consciously work on and my years of solitude has helped considerably. So, at present, it's not "gone" but it's managable.

I have a lot to say later, about M's anxiety and fear of loss. Just no time right now to do it justice. I will say, it sounds like you've found your own way of understanding, absorbing and dealing with it and your plan (the counselor) is wise and considerate and helpful. Chances are, you and M can work through this and smooth out the transition to those deeper layers.

Your insights are apt and compassionate; and your wisdom is something you can have faith in.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 10, 2019, 12:02:33 PM
Well, I needed a couple days on my own. I told him I needed to be alone for a while and he said "of course." And then wrote messages, left voicemails, and so forth.

This morning he called again (an hour earlier than he'd said he would) and said he had a very important thing he wanted to give me (I'm seeing him tomorrow night). I said, let's do that tomorrow evening since I'm coming then anyway. He presses and presses--Oh I won't come in, I will just drop it by, etc etc. I said no, please don't, I'd like to do that tomorrow night. He finally agrees to wait, but still had to talk about it, at length.

M says: But let me tell you how important a gift this is...I've had it for YEARS...then he describes a student (who'd paid him a huge compliment about his teaching) from another country who gave him this gift. It happens to be an object after which I'd titled a poem that M. loves. And that's very sweet. But it's not an emergency. His intense desperation to connect with me is not an emergency. Yet to him, it is. Any excuse to just see my face, have me smile and kiss him. Then he'd be okay again for a little while. That's not healthy. I don't want to be NEEEEEEEEEEEEEDED (as Lighter said) to that degree.

I brought up anxiety and attachment issues, and he said "Of course, I understand that" (which is the kind of thing he says about everything). But his behavior...

But I understood what was happening. Last night the pretext was, "May I call because I just want to ask you a silly question?" I said, please don't, I just need to be on my own for a while. Today the pretext is, "May I just bring you the gift?"

He's ruminating again and building up to another anxiety freakout. I have withdrawn a bit, just for a while, to rebalance myself. I explained to him on the phone just now that for me, the whole cycle of his anxiety and the pressure to reassure him was destablizing for me and I need time alone with my own thoughts to "recalibrate" myself. He instantly says he understands (he says that to almost everything I say) but then offers a few little digs (which he denies): "You're using subterfuge, not being direct with me..." I say, I don't like the term "subterfuge" and he says "oh no, not that, etc.".

But the good news is that he did reach out to arrange some counseling.

I've started to understand that the hyperbole that so entertained me at first is pretty toxic when applied to us. "You are the center of my world" kinds of things. He says that kind of thing constantly (in much more elaborate form) and I've started to recoil because it's purple prose, it's excessive, and it's almost alarming.

I am beginning to see that if this relationship is to survive, I'm going to have to be extremely blunt with him, which is not my way. I've tried responding with things like, I don't want to be the center of your world, I want YOU to be the center of your world. I want you to be alone with yourself at times and still happy. I want you to enjoy your own self. I cannot hold everything you're piling into my arms.

This has become exhausting, but I'm seeing my T in a few hours. Thank god.

Thank you all for listening, I appreciate it so much. This is part of my own anxiety management.

Security is going to do me no good if I'm drowning and I'm beginning to worry that M may drown me. He is still a wonderful person, but I think this relationship is going to be the mature-boundary test of my life.

love
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 10, 2019, 01:41:10 PM
I just wrote him a calm, reassuring message.
His silly question had been: Are you my girlfriend?

I told him yes, I hadn't disappeared, shared a little about my experience with anxiety, and expressed great faith in him that if he enters therapy with courage and endures the whirlwind inside himself, he may have fulfillment and peace he's never had. For the rest of his life.

I wrote, I love you and I needed time alone. I always will.

He wrote back that I have extraordinary EQ, have helped him so much, etc etc. He sounded calmer. Repeated his plan to enter therapy.

So in the moment, it's better. I need to be willing to sacrifice enough of my self-time to offer at least that much reassurance. It's challenging, though. Sets off my own anxieties too so self-management of that becomes critical.

xo
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on June 10, 2019, 04:08:09 PM
Hops, I think you need to be careful.  This popped out at me:

"I need to be willing to sacrifice enough of my self time to offer at least that much reassurance".

I will be blunt - I mean this in a loving way!  You shouldn't need to be willing to sacrifice your self time to offer him reassurance - particularly as you only need the self time because he's been so OTT and you shouldn't need to be reassuring him about anything - he has no reason to doubt you, your feelings or anything else.  This whirlwind has been completely in his mind and hasn't come from you.  I'm not happy that he's not hearing your "No".  I know it isn't a direct no, but you've made it clear that you want a couple of days to yourself and he's ignored your need for the sake of his own.  He's saying you're not being direct with him when you've been nothing but direct, but he's chosen to ignore your direct statements (I need a couple of days to myself), says he understands (either he doesn't understand , in which case he shouldn't say he does, or he does but he's ignoring what you need anyway).

You do have extraordinary EQ and I'm sure you have helped him a lot - but that shouldn't be at the expense of your own peace, calm, anxiety and so on.  It worries me that he's not letting you have time away from him.  It's good that he's made an appointment for therapy (has he made an appointment?  Actually booked, first meeting scheduled?).  But therapy can stir up a whole melting pot of hideousness, as we all know, can go on for years (as we also all know) and can be very difficult for the people around us to deal with as we deal with all our stuff.

With a heavy heart, I would say proceed with caution (which I know you will anyway, oh wise one :) ).  I'm concerned that there's been such a big change in such a short period of time - from tutus and lovely meals and exotic trips away to him not being able to cope with being on his own for five minutes.  It seems a big shift and it makes me wonder if there's an underlying mental health issue of some sort (not wanting to get into possible diagnosing because we all know how fruitless that is!  But it seems like a big change in a short space of time).  I do hope it's just a five minute wobble and it all sorts itself out again quickly but do take care of yourself - remember your own advice - you need to be the centre of your own world xx xx xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 10, 2019, 04:47:41 PM
Thank you, Tupp. I hear your warning and it matches some alarm chimes I've heard clearly. I won't diminish or overlook what's been happening.

My T today understood the concern but was very positive that he made an appointment for therapy (plus he wrote me he is going to pursue whatever best track is advised for him). She also said she's seen people learn this kind of thing about themselves and make enormous progress.

She said it's not guaranteed but it is possible that he may achieve major insights in a relatively rapid time. He really is driven and may attack self-knowledge the same way he's attacked scholarly knowledge. She believes he has insecure attachment, which his behavior has vastly demonstrated lately. At the same time, I've been very clear with him that I cannot manage his anxieties for him and I will continue to be clear. We did have a mature exchange today, when I think he heard me and responded in a calm adult way. I offered sympathy and compassion and said, "I love you and I needed time alone. I always will."

She gave me a great framing, something I will say to him. I can say, there is a gift I want from you...that is, if or when I indicate (clearly) that I need a day or two days alone, the gift you could give me is, "I'll miss you. But have a great two days and we'll talk then." And then leave me alone to do what I need to do for myself. If he can do that, having had it explained, then we're in much better shape. If instead he still shows the addict behaviors, of wanting/needing me like a "fix", or making little jabs or accusations about me, then I may have to back waaaaaaaaaay off. It'd be very sad but I'd survive.

I'm cautious but not breaking it off. I am committed to speaking up for myself, saying what I want and don't want, and sitting with the possibility of it not working out. That's asking for what I want, and releasing the outcome. I get to choose.

I'm not abandoning ship quite yet. But this has been a sobering period of revelation. A lot of compassion and love have happened too. But I'm not looking to mother or therapize or nurse him. And will find out if he can let go of that urge.

Thanks so much for caring and listening so well.

love
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Meh on June 11, 2019, 12:27:25 AM
It's okay to respond in your own time and slow it down. 
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on June 11, 2019, 12:35:07 AM
Thank you, Tupp. I hear your warning and it matches some alarm chimes I've heard clearly. I won't diminish or overlook what's been happening.

My T today understood the concern but was very positive that he made an appointment for therapy (plus he wrote me he is going to pursue whatever best track is advised for him). She also said she's seen people learn this kind of thing about themselves and make enormous progress.

She said it's not guaranteed but it is possible that he may achieve major insights in a relatively rapid time. He really is driven and may attack self-knowledge the same way he's attacked scholarly knowledge. She believes he has insecure attachment, which his behavior has vastly demonstrated lately. At the same time, I've been very clear with him that I cannot manage his anxieties for him and I will continue to be clear. We did have a mature exchange today, when I think he heard me and responded in a calm adult way. I offered sympathy and compassion and said, "I love you and I needed time alone. I always will."

She gave me a great framing, something I will say to him. I can say, there is a gift I want from you...that is, if or when I indicate (clearly) that I need a day or two days alone, the gift you could give me is, "I'll miss you. But have a great two days and we'll talk then." And then leave me alone to do what I need to do for myself. If he can do that, having had it explained, then we're in much better shape. If instead he still shows the addict behaviors, of wanting/needing me like a "fix", or making little jabs or accusations about me, then I may have to back waaaaaaaaaay off. It'd be very sad but I'd survive.

I'm cautious but not breaking it off. I am committed to speaking up for myself, saying what I want and don't want, and sitting with the possibility of it not working out. That's asking for what I want, and releasing the outcome. I get to choose.

I'm not abandoning ship quite yet. But this has been a sobering period of revelation. A lot of compassion and love have happened too. But I'm not looking to mother or therapize or nurse him. And will find out if he can let go of that urge.

Thanks so much for caring and listening so well.

love
Hops

I think you're right not to break it off yet, and I did wonder about 'The Switch' - do you remember that book you recommended to me about romantic relationships?  I can't remember the name of it now but the one where she talks about 'The Switch' which is usually where one person backs off when the realisation that 'this is serious' hits them.  I just wondered if instead of backing off, M has gone in to some sort of emotional meltdown.

Whatever the reasons behind all of this, I do hope it settles down and things are okay.  It was lovely reading your happy posts and I would be upset if this turned out to be a problematic relationship, too, so I do hope that things turn out alright for you both xx xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on June 11, 2019, 11:12:50 AM
Aw Hops... I just lost a huge long rambling post thanks to kitty & puppy dumping coffee. Dammit.

But, my main point was that fear of loss always starts from a recognition of something external to oneself that creates a sense of wholeness in the person; something that they can't or don't know how to supply for themselves. There is usually an ego-wound wrapped up in that fear somewhere too. That drives the clinginess, the anxiety, and the protestations that they'll just curl up and die without you. Been there, done that myself... and stopped doing it. (for now)

That's a hell of a lot shorter and sans the reminiscences of Mike's bio and our relationship than what was written before. Probably a lot more digestible too. LOL.

Having gone through my own loss of Mike and sharing with and supporting other widows... realize that the process each person goes through is based on their basic emotional make up. One woman insisted she wanted to die, for months. Despite bringing up all the ways she hated her hubby. Others are mostly withdrawn and private, only occasionally seeking out the connection of understanding & support from others. One in particular, moved into high gear "doing" immediately after her hubs' passing and didn't stop to breathe for at least a year. All of them, including moi, have come through all those wacky phases without attempting to replace the attachment object that was lost. (to speak clinically about it)

M's only in year 1 of adjusting. His manifestions are partly due to his loss, and finding that you and he are incredibly compatible in a lot of ways is fueling hope for replacement - even though rationally, he's probably aware that you are a different person altogether. The emotional & rational in him, at the moment, aren't exactly the same stream of energy. Maybe he does have attachment issues, or some emotional neediness that he hasn't acknowledged and brought into his rational brain yet. Counseling, therapy of course, helps with that. But in a convoluted way - this is ALSO a form of grieving and trying to make himself whole again. IMO, the only thing that makes a person whole again is time - and mostly time spent making peace with the loss and finding one's self again - the whole self.

But that's hindsight talking; I'm coming up on the 4th year of my loss. I know that early on, I simply could not explain my behavior or actions to anyone - not even Hol. She kinda understood intuitively since we've always been close and because we've spent so much time together now, she gets it. She's been monitoring me and the progress going on. And she's impatient as hell, for me to just let go of the past patterns and habits and move the F on, to put it her vernacular. LOL. I'm just trying to give myself the luxury of thoroughness and creating the new comfort-zone of being able to trust my SELF, without relying so much on externals - mostly other people - for that sense of well-being. Given my past history you can see how that makes sense. For ME.

Other people need different things; have different ways through. So, maybe one thing you and M can start to talk about, is whether this manifestion of neediness is really who he is... or if it's new, and a reaction to loss and trying to find his way through that. There isn't any weakness or shame involved in getting help with the process. In my most confused times... my big brothers and all you Amazons were there shining some light on what I couldn't see then. Holly too. We DO tend to come out the other side of grieving loss knowing ourselves better and stronger emotionally, if we give ourselves the opportunity to go through the labyrinth.

You are right to be wary of being the band-aid in this situation. But you don't know enough yet, to determine if this behavior is engrained in his personality and therefore a red flag, or if it's related to grieving. Bandaids don't fix or heal anything; they just protect the ego from the agony of the labyrinth. Time apart is the common sense way to get some perspective on the situation. Counseling will likely provide the answers you need, and I agree with your T - it shouldn't take long. Remember, "bargaining" is one of the steps in the grieving process... and gifts to an attractive replacement can be seen as bargaining, can't it?

OK, I'm getting wordy again and off in the weeds. Good place to stop before I go completely off the rails again. LOL.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 12, 2019, 11:24:49 AM
Thank you, Amber.
I think you're spot on that it's grief unfinished, or at least partially that.

He greeted me last night with another question, expressed with trembling intensity:
"Do we love each other?" I asked back, "Why are you asking this?" (I could tell it was a "trick" question -- not manipulative tricky, but sort of desperate trick to reassure himself.) I said yes, I love you. And he is staring and says (for the umpteenth time) that he loves me, "deeply." And then he says, "Then that's it! All is well! Because that's the baseline, everything will be fine!"

And, because my hobby is peeing on people's dreams, I said, but these words are not magic. Love is not enough. Love is real but it's not magic and doesn't fix everything.

Still, we had a more peaceful evening. He talked a lot about his panic and paranoia, and more about the physical vulnerability he feels, and more and MORE about how much he desires me wants to caress me how important touch is (for the umpteenth time). I tried to express how when something is constantly verbalized it may dampen the chances that it (meaning reciprocal desire) can arise organically in a present moment.

I said it better than that. What I meant was, yes I am attracted, but the constant talk ABOUT touching makes it less natural to touch or let it happen naturally. (I think I meant, you don't give me a chance to touch you before you verbalize it; it's as though as you're in a relationship with yourself and just sharing the thoughtstream). He just narrates everything, even while it's happening. I can hold him and he'll take it in for a nanosecond and then start: "Yes? See? I like this! See how nice this is! It feels so good to be close to you...and on and on and ON."

Maybe part of it is professoritis. He literally talks his way through life and though I sure am a talker too, I think my T had an insight when she suggested that his nonstop narration might be a way of making a wall of words.

Rather than bringing us closer, sometimes his talking allows nothing in. It's a stream of illustrations and instructions sometimes. It's too fast for him to take much in. Though I do notice he comes back later and refers to something I said once. He's brilliant IQ, and struggling EQ.

We went for a walk after dinner and I think that calms him down. He does have a lot of the "H" in ADHD, I think. His life has been almost nonstop cerebral for decades.

Whew, tiring just to write about. But for me, we stepped down the intensity a notch, and he also acknowledged that although he fell deeply, completely in love with me--the timing might have been too soon in terms of grief. And I was glad to hear him say it. For him to recognize that these things could be overlapping was good, and gets to the heart of what you were saying, about replacement.

He does see me as an individual. But he was trying to make his last chapter "over and done" and grief doesn't work that way. It flows in and out for a long time. That loss will come and go even once he's in my arms the morning after. That is natural.

love,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on June 12, 2019, 11:33:12 AM
I think, from reading that, Hops, that it makes sense that the speed and intensity he's showing at the minute with your relationship is a way for him to stop or avoid feeling the loss of his wife, or that there's guilt in there somewhere (because he's fallen in love again) and he's trying to block it out.  And I don't mean by that that he's using you as a distraction and his feelings aren't real, just more that his feelings for you are probably (must be) triggering feelings for his late wife and the pain of losing her - and possibly pain from that first marriage that perhaps is still lurking in there somewhere.  We all know how keeping busy stops us from dealing with painful feelings.  Hopefully his therapy sessions will start helping him to make headway with that somewhere (and maybe offloading to a therapist will slow down what he talks to you about as well).  He's very lucky to have you as a port in the storm at the moment; I suspect someone less self assured and focused would have either thrown in the towel by now or rushed along to keep up with him - neither of which I think would be very sensible.  I hope things settle a bit for you and he starts seeing his T soon xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on June 12, 2019, 11:27:30 PM
Oh Lordy, Hops:

If this T, and you can't find a way to get M calmed down.... I don't know how long you can remain steady.

It's impossible to know if this very need state is M's constant, or if it's a temporary way of being.

If this is how he was during both marriages... he's unlikely to change, IME.

I'm up to my elbows in gators right now, but will come back and post more tomorrow.  I hope.

Sorry things are slipping sideways, Hops.  I'm hoping this is just a bobble.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on June 13, 2019, 09:32:22 AM
Tupp, I'm starting to think you have the best natural ability of all of us here, to be able to counsel others. Your intuition about him feeling guilty or trying to make amends for something in the past could be spot on. It IS something that people who've lost a spouse experience and it manifests in different ways.

Hops, that belief in the magic of those 3 words to make everything OK, in all situations unequivocably is something I've known too in Mike. Sometimes, it does work. But more often, I think women prefer being SHOWN that love in actions and behaviors... than simply another reiteration of the promised commitment. Words are just words, after all. And since we all lie to ourselves at one time or another - or indulge in pretending - the incantation is always less than satisfying to our different ways of knowing the world. But, in my experience with guys and their foibles, I think many times the incantation is made in hopes of being shown that love to themselves... as much as wanting the opportunity to proceed showing it to you. (It's a more concrete transaction that way for them - or some of them. And no, I don't have the words right yet about this.)

I have seen a pattern in people who demonstrate their anxiety with a tsunami of words (wonder how I caught on to that... LOL). Variations about the reasons why are sure to exist. But what Lighter said about the wall of words is a bullseye. People around the talker, get caught up in the stream... feedback and interaction from the audience, reassures the talker that they're worthy of attention and having an impact; that they are "real"... even as the wall of words hides their feelings of insecurity about their self-worth. They're good at talking; they're less good just being quiet and still feeling comfortable in their own skin. The motivation is to prove... worthiness. IE, worthiness is conditional and dependent on being able to express themselves, be understood, and even praised... by external sources. It's a form of lack of self-confidence. Professor-itis, indeed. As many faculty as I've known over the years, as the relationships endured and deepened, this was something that many of them had in common. Part of my job was helping them feel confident in their abilities to manage technology.

So, that's identifying a possible problem. Solutions or Rx's... are to reassure the person that it's perfectly safe to relax with you. Maybe choose a time to "practice" just being together silently. Start with short time frames, or the antsyness will get unbearable... LOL. While it's important to communicate your boundaries and need for time alone, it's also necessary to emphasize the wish to share time together. Above & beyond, what you normally would do perhaps. This might help dampen any fears of abandonment. (and it doesn't always help; in this case, I don't think M knows any other way to manage his feelings, and perhaps hasn't even untangled them yet; when he's shown how I'm sure he'll try his best to master it before he realizes that isn't even totally necessary all the time)

Maybe set aside some time during the week to play a little game. Something to occupy monkey-mind, like checkers or cards... while just being together. That might reveal some new information. And it also gives you both practice not being focused so much on each other but still being very much together.

And.... I'm getting way too far out in the weeds again. Be patient, Hops. Your sense of things is strong and wise. You're a little ahead of M, in the process of getting to know each other - the warts & all phase. And if he's going to devote some time to inner work on his own, he'll need the privacy to deal with it. It's temporary, as we know. But I have a feeling he's going to need a lot of the same kind of compassionate support and intuition that we practice around here, too. For awhile. You both will see the relationship from a new perspective, down the road a ways. And you can't predict that perspective from where you are now - travelling together. Hang in there; M will appreciate that later.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on June 14, 2019, 10:40:15 AM
So much wise input....Amber, and Tupp. Wow.

I wanted to touch on finding a safe way to express and receive comfort/physical attention that could help calm things down.

Maybe set up a playdate in jammies with soothing touch....inner arms, backs of knees, where more trust, and comfort are exchanged.

If you initiate, Hops, it could flip things for both of you, IME.  There would be important rules in place, and agreed to.

You can consider it, or dismiss the idea as you've handled this well as can be expected.  You'll continue making sound decisions.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 21, 2019, 01:53:44 PM
Whew. I want to apologize in advance for not replying to each post discretely, but just yammering. Recent things you have each observed or offered have had a hugely helpful impact on my thinking recently. But if this time, I take the time to tease out individual observations and respond to each properly I'll never get through it.

The whole ante just upped a lot for me, and it's got many layers. So please forgive me for not responding properly individually, so I can just get most of it out.

I nearly broke up with M. We're at a pivot point. I think he knows it but what matters is that I know it. Reasons:

--He got an automated update from my D's online fundraiser. He danced around but told me about it. AND, he characterized it as "I got an email from X [D's friend who runs the site for her]." My instant fear and pain was what it always is. He had made a previous donation, adding a note about "from someone who loves someone who loves you very much" (which was intrusive, behind my back, and not okay. He was inserting himself to make me the source.) But my first thought was, oh no, her friend doesn't have my contact info so wrote to him (because his email shows his name). Is my D dead? What has happened?

The truth? It WASN'T a personal contact, it was a routine auto email from the site hosts (it mentioned friend's name in subject line but was clearly an auto-thing). And he didn't make that clear.

Long story shorter, it turned into a lot of excruciating back and forth where he toyed with what or how he was going to strategize his donations to her (because "he really wants to help."). And my heart is torn because damn, he COULD change her life if he wanted. BUT...it's all under the umbrella of him having a paternalistic sense of himself, and I know about his previous driving interest in her ("the daughter I never had", and his obsessive returning and returning to pry about her earlier...and I do not want her to become one of his f*ing PROJECTS). Then...I learned that his second donation (which he didn't ask me about, despite having agreed that he would do NOTHING in her direction ever, without my explicit permission) was a piddling amount. It won't do anything real for her and it was not worth dragging me through the anguish I go through every single time he finds a way to bring her up.

Anyway, later he sent me an email that, in my view, was arrogant (he sees his motives as purely altruistic--I believe he's willing to bring up my D, casting himself in a hero's light, in order to get my attention yanked back to him) and included phrases like "I have not yet decided what I'll do" and "I will let you know what I do" and "I will let you know when..." etc. All of his remarks in that email were the opposite of keeping his earlier promise to never interfere, never question my judgement about my D, and never make a single move in her direction unless he has my explicit permission. And the fact that early on, I knew I needed to spell this out should have been a warning.

Anyway, I am not giving that permission. Something about his triangulating over this, fantasizing about "I'll have to find another channel to reach her" (what? a private investigator? is he kidding?), inserting his power as an uninvited father figure when he does not know her and does not comprehend mental illness, made me feel he was basically disturbing the status quo as much for his own gratification---a hero fantasy---as for her. And with absolutely no regard for what all this stirred up for me. Agony. Again.

I just lost it with his "another channel" remark, because he's proceeding with a rescue fantasy separate from me and it's not his place! I get him. I get that he sees himself as the kindly pater familias, and has fantasies of incorporating her into his "firelight." BUT AFTER FOUR MONTHS IN MY LIFE HE IS NOT WELCOME TO DO THAT. He is too into control and pressure and getting what he wants and creating goals that involve wearing me down...and if he inserts himself between me and my D, not only will I NEVER see her again but I would never forgive him for that invasion of MY parental space, empty though it is. He doesn't have at stake what I do, and he must respect my wishes. Period.

I basically blew up in writing, ranted at him about the boundary I'd set and felt he blew past, and told him I didn't feel safe with him emotionally.

He was devastated and said I mischaracterized everything, and he simply wants to help. Maybe he does. He is sensitive. But also has so much unrecognized male privilege and power that he can play around with another person's deepest life, just because he is wealthy. I am SO sensitive to this, and for him to busy himself in my greatest wound "just because he can" makes me crazy. So we fought on the phone, I pulled back, and then he had another panicky meltdown.

(My long stories never get shorter, sorry.) Finally, I told him I do NOT want to talk about it, but if he wants to donate this and only this is what he has my permission to do:

1) Donate ONE amount through that fundraiser, ONE time more. Up to him, but whatever he is comfortable with. (Iow, don't give one hundred and then another hundred months later. If he REALLY wants to "rescue" her, then do something that will make a difference.) I said, take the money you're spending on taking me to Paris and give her that. It would be a much better use of that amount. (He's told me he wins or loses that much on the stock market in a day, or maybe it was a week, can't remember. I don't care, but he's not going to send me into the emotional pits over an unserious amount. If he really is yearning to help her, then help her. In a real way. Or shut up about it.) I really do believe it was about getting my attention back. He comes up with pretext after pretext any time I withdraw.

2) Do it anonymously, and unsubscribe from further updates. I cannot cope with ongoing hints, reminders, mentions of emails, etc.

I also said, do it without hinting, expecting thanks, asking for credit, or turning it into a fantasy of becoming directly involved. He replied, "I understand" and I hope he does.

I didn't want to see him for days and couldn't sleep and felt awful. Because of course I want her to be helped!!!! But not if he's "taking over" and going at it like Professor Superior. I left him a message after calming down, telling him I care about his heart too, but he does not grasp the "ferocity of pain" I have around this issue, that I know things about her approach to life that he does not, and the next time I saw him we didn't talk about my D again.

So I really mean it. If he's motivated solely by empathy but also respects me, then he should give her a significant sum that could actually change her situation. Or nothing. I'm not letting a millionaire play with my pain just because he can purchase "credit" for that because he has that economic ability.

He doesn't see any of this (the power and privilege stuff) or worry about it. But I see it, and I do.

Next, there was his complete freakout that I was backing away. I considered not going to Paris and really hesitated. So the next time we got together he was trembling, put his head on my shoulder like a child, and was clearly devastated. I was unnerved by his emotional collapse.

So there's a whole LOT to unpack, in therapy and in our relationship, if it's going to survive. He says he's looking forward to his first T appointment. My sense of him is that his approach will be completely intellectual and it will be many months before he faces what drives him at the core. A huge insecurity, despite his career.

What I'm contemplating is being a loving friend to him (I do love him) and backing way off the romance. I'm romanticism-averse anyway, and his romantic hyperbole was entertaining and flattering at first, but I realize (not for the first time in my life) that it leads to delusions unless a person keeps a tight grip on the difference between fantasy love (he's a medievalist and on his 18th book grounded in the 15th century) and reality-based love.

I told a friend this week that I want two things in a relationship: love and freedom. And if I'm ever backed into a corner and forced to choose, I will choose freedom.

So there it is. I still love the man, haven't completely abandoned the dream of a happy future together (we enjoyed ourselves a lot on a recent outing, talked as enthusiastically as ever). But for my pace, we're way too early to be talking about permanence and racing into commitment or major changes (me moving, etc.).

I hope therapy and travel both add good layers and we can grow together, still. But if we can't...I choose freedom. (Even old-age poverty doesn't scare me as much as losing that. I do commit and sacrifice, but it's voluntary. I won't be pried out of a parental role, or wedged into any other kind of presumed role, without consent.)

Thanks much for listening, alla y'all. Thoughts very welcome as always, and next time I'll appreciate them one person at a time.

Love you much!
xxxooo
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on June 21, 2019, 03:40:04 PM
Oh Hops.  I will speak bluntly and from my gut and I will apologise now because it will probably sound too blunt and I don't mean or want to add to what you are dealing with at the moment but I found reading what he's done with regards to your D horrendously painful, horribly, horribly controlling, utterly dismissive of your terribly broken heart where your D is concerned - and then he manipulated the whole thing back round so that he was the terribly wounded party crying on your shoulder because he was 'only trying to help'.

I won't lecture you on what you should and shouldn't do; you are a wise woman, you've weathered these storms many times before and we all know you won't end up trapped in a bad place.  But I can see nothing but control and manipulation in everything you described there.  Sitting down with you, discussing D's fundraiser, asking what you think about him donating, if so how much, etc etc, would all have been appropriate.  Giving you time to think, feel, wonder and then respecting your decision, whatever it was, all good.

But donating, talking about email updates, claiming he'll contact her in other ways, he hasn't decided what he'll do yet - what the f?  No, Hopsie, this is very bad, these are not misguided attempts to help, this is controlling behaviour and through your D as well - that terribly painful and tenuous relationship that you've tried so desperately to avoid severing completely without allowing yourself to be destroyed in the process.  Such a huge job you've had to do with that and he treats it like a game?  And doesn't even give you the grace of knowing her medical bills are paid (which I know would be a huge weight off your mind) but instead donates a small amount that will make no difference.

My worry (for you) is that this has changed so dramatically and so hugely in such a short space of time.  I am reminded of a previous boyfriend of mine who was, initially, so charming and funny and I enjoyed being with him so much.  We fell head over heels so quickly, moved in together and literally within weeks I was living with a completely different person - whiny, clingy, didn't like me going out without him, used to turn up if I did go out and leave him at home, called me throughout the day which initially I took as a sign he really liked me but I eventually realised was just him getting his 'mommy' fix from me.  This doesn't feel like the slow unpacking of a relationship were you gradually learn more about one another; it feels more like a facade initially and this is the reality.

I understand completely you loving him.  Love doesn't vanish overnight in the same way it isn't there overnight but please do be careful not to work too hard at understanding where he's coming from in all of this, Hops.  You're not his therapist and you shouldn't have to wait months?  years? to see if the therapy is making any difference.  If he'd been like this when you first met him you'd have run a mile.  So please do just take care to guard your heart and keep your time for you, your self care, your health and your own peace of mind.

You don't need to worry about replies or apologise for not replying; we all know what it's like when things boil over like this.  But he needs to sort himself out pronto; I will not be happy if I have to come over there and kick his arse!!

Please do take care of you and I'm sorry for sounding harsh and abrupt but this is troubling me and I don't want you getting hurt xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 21, 2019, 05:10:52 PM
Thank you, Tupp.
I think your warnings are realistic and completely reasonable.
That's why I've hit the brakes.
Not (so far) to end the relationship, but to pull back enough that I get a chance to see if he's learning fast or not at all.

I agree with you that he was being manipulative but am also thinking that's driven by huge anxiety. Reflexive, but not his true character (hopefully, and it remains to come clear).

His carelessness or lack of recognition of what it'd trigger in me is blindness rather than cruelty, I think. Even though he does have a very tender heart (dogs, kids, I can see it clearly) ... I think it's impossible to show true empathy when:

--one is beside oneself with anxiety and dependent need (I was exactly like this in a relationship some years ago), and

--due to personality, anxiety and insecurity, one cannot listen enough to feel fully developed empathy. One might WISH to, but anxiety can be like a forest fire. (I told him grief hurts terribly, but anxiety terrifies.)

I truly am curious about his response to therapy. Enough to want to remain in his life -- at least for now. But with substantial changes. I'm stepping back and planning to tell him I think we either slow it way back and reboot back to getting to know each other through traditional talking (not life fusing so fast). Or we stop.

Your concern is very well reasoned and well taken. I'm listening.

And so grateful.
love,
Hops

PS--And if it turns out he does need a good old-fashioned Tupp-Whupping (arse kicking), I'll buy your plane ticket!  xxxooo
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on June 21, 2019, 05:53:38 PM
Oh (((((((((HOPS))))))))). How horrible for you.

Yes, he definitely exposed his ulterior motives breaking through that boundary. Completely agree with your assessment - and I feel your upset is justified. You explained how this was very painful for you up front, to the best of your ability -- and he thinks he can fix this, get back in your good graces by using D? WHATever he thought -- I think you've clearly seen through that. Talk about jeopardizing trust.

:shakes head:

Tell ya what, while I was going through that feet 6 in off the ground phase myself, part of the reason I kept babbling about it, was because I KNOW it's not good for me to stick in that phase too long. I needed to see how I was getting the cart before the horse. As it is, it wore off in 72 hours and I was grounded again. STILL just as happy, but a lot more sane. Having more time in between seeing my guy is a GOOD thing, IMO.

The silly things I entertained in my head that first 24 hrs after he left anyway... make me rightfully blush. I KNOW BETTER, by now. And I may return to those giddy, googly-eyed feelings again... but they can't be ALL I'm thinking/feeling about him. Real life, has a whole different set of requirements.

Now, I guess you've got a chance to see how he responds to you being angry with him. See if he can apologize and understand what he did wrong and why that made you angry - after specific instructions not to interfere, because it would cause you pain. See if he understands that anger in one partner doesn't HAVE to mean the end of the relationship (although sometimes it does) and if he can do what is needed to repair what he broke INSTEAD OF what (believing he knew better) he tried to "fix".

I think you're the one who's taken on the "project" Hops. More power (and patience) to ya... I think you're gonna need it. That's the kind of thing I'd have been angry about too. It's like going behind your back to assert his "greater powers" to make things OK... when all he's done is made them worse than they were previously. I don't think I'd have been as kind and compassionate to him as you were.

PS - might be a good night to sip some bourbon with a girlfriend.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 21, 2019, 07:17:23 PM
Thanks, hon.

I should've added that he did, profusely, express remorse that he triggered my renewed anguish over her. He still didn't understand how his executive-management wording offended me, but unpacking unconscious patriarchal stuff isn't going to come quick. (And he believes he's a grand wordsmith so I doubt he'd see that somewhat-pompous tone the way I do.) So he remained convinced his effort was misunderstood but I believed him that he was also truly sorry he had caused pain. Particularly over his careless description of the "auto" email he'd gotten as "an email from her friend." He swore he understood ALL my instructions if he did donate, and not mention her again otherwise.

In addition to devastated at the near-breakup, he looked truly remorseful when I saw him, and has since backed way off the hyperbolic-romantic incessant reminders of how he feels and what he wants (perhaps he DID hear my explanation that they were backfiring, not leaving me oxygen or space to cross toward him voluntarily).

So...I dunno. I imagine a relationship with anyone with a lifetime's baggage at my age will mean work. I'm backing off to a caring but safe emotional distance to be damn sure it's not going to be consuming, pointless effort. If it's an endless struggle I will end it. I think traveling together for a week (with my own room to retreat to) may be a good chance to observe some additional stuff.

I don't mind adjusting, learning, and also challenging myself in therapy (why do I freak out about sex?). So if he is doing the same and showing signs of insight, mebbe we'll make it. (He even said he didn't care, he wants me enough as his lifelong companion that he'd commit to me even without it.) Hmmm. I just know I have to feel completely safe and not overpowered and not pressured in order to enjoy it. B, the previous "boyfriend" -- pissed me off in the same way. I think part of M's pressure is his post-surgery anxiety to check out whether he's still able. He was two years ago, but is also panicking about age and mortality since losing her.

One whiff of entitlement to my body before I offer it and I'm outta there. My last "fun only" lover -- decade and a half ago! -- responded to MY invitation. Hmmm.

But it's not only all that. It's the "fusion" he's been trying to create with me. Belatedly, despite many years of craving that myself before oodles of therapy taught me how unhealthy it was, and how I had to learn to love myself and not look, as you mentioned, to external sources to make me okay...I have caught on that he's in just the same place I was back then.

My hope (not expectation) is that as brilliant as he is, he might perhaps respond to therapy with insight. Worth a little time, I think.

Thanks much Amber...y'all have no idea what your support and insight means!

love
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 21, 2019, 07:37:53 PM
While it's important to communicate your boundaries and need for time alone, it's also necessary to emphasize the wish to share time together. Above & beyond, what you normally would do perhaps. (http://While it's important to communicate your boundaries and need for time alone, it's also necessary to emphasize the wish to share time together. Above & beyond, what you normally would do perhaps.)

Problem with that is, after 15+ lonely but independent years alone...adjusting to seeing him 3 times/week is already a challenge for me. And otherwise, I worry that this kind of approach puts me in a transference-a-la-therapist position, and I vastly do not care to do that. Or take that role. At all. Happy to share with him various insights I've picked up from decades of therapy, but not as his instructor.

Good news on the same curve. I think partly in response to his own freakouts, he decided to "un-retire." He wants to keep teaching, professorizing, until he falls over. And I feel relieved, as does he. I think all that mental energy was going into me, after 50 years of having a LOT of other things to think about. (He recently returned the proofs for his latest book, so he still has an amazing work discipline.) I am just glad because he absolutely loves teaching and scholarship. And he's going to drop all the extra administrative stuff, such as heading up graduate studies, that made FT into FT+. He happened to know a friend of my father's who died face-first into his typewriter at 101, still writing scholarly articles. He says, I want to go like that! And I think for him, that'd be perfect.

For me, if I'm with him long term? Time to MYSELF!!!

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on June 22, 2019, 05:35:39 AM
I keep trying to write a post, Hops, and keep deleting it because I keep saying things that I know you already know and are aware of :)  So I will just say that I know you will figure this out, I hope you know that while we are all rooting for you to have the happy ever after bit we also don't want you having to compromise on any of the things you've worked so hard for and you hold so dear to yourself.  So I hope you will keep posting, keep thinking, keep taking back your space and time and keep looking after you.  Not least because I've got no-one to water my plants if I have to come over there and kick his arse :) Lol xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on June 22, 2019, 09:34:16 AM
((Hops)) I'm so relieved he's going back to work.  Whatever happens.  All that focus and zeal was impossible to deal with, mainly bc he can't hear you through his need, as you've mentioned.

I hope the T breaks through.  He's smart enough.

The fact he's messing in your wounds, like fingerprinting child, then going all Irkle...
"Did I DO that?". It's maddening, imo.

It's forgivable if he respects that bou dary going forward.  I think. 

It's a terrible thing when your new, supposed to be safe person, begins putting your emotional safety in his sights, and for what seems to be attention.  It doesn't feel molevolent but it feels deeply disordered.

I think Paris will make or break the bond.  Hold steady.  Don't give an inch.  Take back the ground you lost.  He learns and can be trained, or cannot.

Stay in observer mode as you can manage.  No matter what he does, this can still be a period of growth, lovely meals, and compassion for you both.  There will be deep sadness if he can't make the shift, but you're hopefully able to stay level, and hold what you got, as they say.

Don't panic if things go awry.  Know he's doing his best, and can't manage more.  He would if he could.  Our limitations are so human, and heartbreaking, imo. 

I guess I'm saying that if he fails, just enjoy Paris on your own.  Try to resist racing to the airport in horror.....worst case scenario.  Been there, done that.  He'll likely talk you into staying, and that's deeper misery, IME.

Courage, Hops.  Maybe he'll be brave enough to figure this out.
Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on June 22, 2019, 10:59:26 AM
If you read my long description of Buck, Hops... you might already know what I'm going to say.

You may have to enforce that tiny bit of space between you and M, for awhile on your own. I don't like the "fusion" idea either, but I know Mike really went there after he retired and I fully sympathize with the Japanese women stuck with retired husbands. I'm not picking up any of that from Buck; he's been alone long enough. It's myself I have to watch, because precisely, it's what I was used to with Mike. I don't want that again. ESPECIALLY when we're older, we have to adapt those "conditioned expectations" of what a relationship is and the structure of it to the complicated mess of what our lives have been up till now. That requires individual, private space. Entry into it, needs to be requested - not taken for granted.

The sex thing is also different when we're older. I swear, we might as well be teenagers again what with all the angst and self-consciousness about our bodies. For guys, that often shows up in performance anxiety. Everyone deals with it their own way too. For me, it's an area of compatibility in the top 10 important things on my wishlist. And so it's also something that I explore earlier than most people. What I noticed - despite being able to immerse myself fully still, despite my old lady body - is that even in the peaceful, safe place afterwards... I needed to go back to my own room to sleep. Let my brain process everything while I slept. (I think I might've been wary about emotional whiplash, too... part of my emotional self wants to judge this as "cheating" on Mike. It's not at all rational in any way shape or form; but I am paying attention to it regardless. That would be loyalty at my own expense, and I know for a fact he didn't expect me to enter a nunnery while he's chasing blondes in heaven.)

What was really welcome to me, was being able to talk about it openly without "posturing" or ego-crap. He surprised me in an embrace and kiss (I'd given him a huge hug when he arrived; this was later on) and while I didn't expect anything of the sort... I was ready and willing to not just receive but give as good or better than I got. Full throttle. And he made sure verbally it was what I wanted; even letting me come to his room and leave as I needed to. But then, there have been "omens" all along our friendship period that there was some kind of intuitive understanding & respect for our separate life experiences between us.

It's a totally different style of thing that you're going through Hops. I'm not even sure they're comparable - apples to apples. But I shared your reticence about sex too and whether I even had that side of me left alive... until it was called forth. She's been in hiding for a long while, but she's way more alive (albeit PICKY) than I expected. And not at all concerned with the vulnerability that's involved in that shared experience. But there's a lot of trust already built up between he and I. The fact that I could definitely still desire someone is very empowering and magical for me.

But I've needed those 4 solitary years of picking through the flies in my own "pepper"... to know whether or not something like this was even on my "want" list. Maybe you need to focus on that for a bit, too. Unravel all the bits & pieces of emtional experience flotsam that have gotten tangled in that very natural expression of life & love in human experience.

For sure it'll be a different ball of yarn, than mine.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 22, 2019, 03:36:57 PM
Thanks, Amber.
I definitely look forward to lovemaking, no doubt about it.
All systems still "go."

My hesitation (ironically similar to with previous bf, "B") is his race against my own pace. I have a deeply ingrained sense of complete and full body autonomy, anxiety about being possessed, and when I'm pressured to speed it up, I react perhaps unfortunately like a human mule who will not go where you want for either carrots or sticks.

After so many years celibate, if someone displays impatience or annoyance, there is literally no bigger turnoff for me. Frankly, I'd be happier doing what I did when young, with no-stringers strangers. If someone GENUINELY wants a joyous couple of decades with me? Then they can spend a leisurely buncha months showing me their patience, their love, etc. Without pressuring me, copping feels, talking nonstop about how urgent their desire is, etc.

M. is trying. His anxiety isn't "normal" male performance anxiety. He is in fact very virile in energy and desire. But he had a prostatectomy, which means that he has to inject himself to perform. As time (age) goes by, medically the results of the injects are a bit less certain (so his two year wait is intense for him). I sympathize with this, and have given serious thought to just lying back and thinking of England (apologies to Tupp) in order to make him happy. I am capable. Yet another part of me resists the sacrificial cliche.

I don't even think sex is our biggest worry. It's the other emotional stuff. For now, I'd like to focus on relaxation. I'm meeting him at his pool shortly and want to talk about throttling back the anxiety as best we both can and valuing our other ways of connecting. We love talking, going places, interacting with Pooch. We really are quite compatible in a lot of the ways that could sustain a good connection.

Even privilege and paternalism. He is profoundly intellectual and into the challenge of ideas. He has responded with respect when I challenge his assumptions or lack of notice (or false equivalence, which he tried on me once). He loves debate and (sigh) though I enjoy the thinking and some degree of persuasion, I don't savor it for its own sake. I told him it felt like Greek wrestling and I hate combat. But intellectually, I can hold my own.

So we'll see. I'm going to invite him to take it one day at a time. He has emotional immaturity that it's his own job to work on, not mine. But I will take care of myself, retreat all I care to, and stop taking the bait when he demands that I recognize this or that. I don't respond to demands. Full stop.

My question within is, once he really grasps the depth of my autonomy, will he actually be able to handle it? Or will he retreat into resentment, snarky comments, or some other form of resistance or (god forbid) revenge? This man has been very powerful in his own sphere for a very long time. One wife left him, and the next was perhaps comfortable in a more traditional position (I don't know). I am a different kettle of fish and I think difficult as well as exciting to him.

So this is a very good time to observe, interact honestly, and protect my independence as powerfully as I need to. I have no doubt that I must and for now, I hope that being kind and listening will move things into a better place. Even if it does, I will push back when he immediately makes a new pronouncement that "all is resolved" and pushes forward into more definitions, proclamations, and declarations of what is true for "us." M needs to learn to speak about himself and for himself, and let go of his habit of declaring what "we" are or what "we" feel. His verbal torrents are both his shield and sword. My hope is he can exit conquest or battle mode.

As we all do, he just assumes everything from his own worldview, which apparently has seldom been intimately challenged. In academia, he has been ruthlessly competitive. If he brings that to us, he will find himself trying to "win" alone.

love
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: CB123 on June 22, 2019, 08:16:14 PM
This is tough.
I love how you are handling it, Hopsie.

CB
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on June 23, 2019, 08:42:46 AM
Hear hear on maintaining your independence and autonomy Hops! It's most difficult to do, IMO, within the construct of marriage -- UNLESS one starts to adapt the definition of what marriage is; and revamps the old engrained roles. We all have our dreams, conditioning, white picket fence syndrome about how it's "supposed" to be, to deal with.

But it sounds like you've carefully chosen a path through the most difficult things you may encounter on this "getting to know you" journey. Assuming no one wants to go back over that section of trail again, it should get easier.

I have an old old friend; just realized that our friendship - varying degrees of closeness through the years - will be 50 years old next year. Her longtime live-in guy just moved out at her request. He has some health issues and went through personality changes along with the cancer and it's treatment. She had just had enough. I've thrown an urgent invitation out to her, that if she feels a need to escape the mundane and ordinary... she can head my way for woods & studio & girl time.

It sounds like she's designed a way for her to remain single and independent, while being a doting gramma... and I'd like to spend time picking through her brain for how she arrived at that decision. We're so similar, we might as well be twin sisters - she was born a week after me, in the same hospital. The big joke is that maybe we were switched at birth, too. LOL.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 23, 2019, 03:38:20 PM
Your friend is lucky to have you, Amber.
We're lucky to have you HERE.

I think one piece that's difficult for me to acknowledge to myself is this: Despite having deep clarity that I am the opposite of a gold-digger, the breezy (economically) future M has dandled in front of me is still kind of torture.

Were I to ferociously guard every scrap of my independence (as I've been doing lately), we'd probably wind up breaking up. And then my real and quite daunting fears of winding up alone in some awful Medicaid nursing home will return. With zero family in my life, I truly believe that I will be in that kind of circumstance. ALL of my friends (except Tupp) have some kind of family support. My friends are aging too, and it's too late to construct some phamily that involves shared living, a shared live-in caregiver, or whatever. The people I know who are interested already have gotten shares in the cheapest co-housing community here that is out of my reach. Or they will move to live near children, or pick an assisted living setup, etc. This is an extremely affluent community with a very thin middle class.

And it really does scare me, given that I work with oldsters who all can afford a relatively middle-ground but still pleasant assisted living situation, either on their own or with family help.

So I am ruthless about trying to hold a boundary in my head about all that as I deal with my feelings for M. I do genuinely love him, but he's also challenging in all the ways I've been talking about. The other side of his "drive to conquer" is true sweetness and vulnerability. He's not a monster, he's just clueless and 70 years of extreme privilege have given him some big blind spots. He has a childish belief in his capacity to manage/decide/fix/improve everything. Life in a golden bubble does that.

Still...I am worried about sorting it all out with deep scruple about how much the say-goodbye-to-fear-of-poverty piece will affect my judgment. Now or later.

I'm ALWAYS in touch with how I feel (happy, sad, threatened, calm). But I worry whether I'm a bad person, still. Whether I'm hiding from myself some piece of "but he is rich" attraction. It's pathetic.

I'm working on that piece, hard. He has NEVER manipulated me with anything related to money. Just offers me everything. No hints of "women are gold diggers" like many older men I've met. Not a word about "you want XX from me". Nothing. (I've made it pretty obvious that I don'.t) But then again, he's still in romantic pursuit mode.

Must hie me to the Goodwill for two new Tshirts.

xxxooo
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 23, 2019, 08:31:59 PM
Amazingly, we just had a wonderful few hours again.
I went to swim with him, got there full of anguish over politics,
vented about it and was crabby and critical of his Knowitall Professoritis....
and then just relaxed a bit and enjoyed some affectionate banter again.

Somehow, having evaded his management of everything (he didn't know
I was coming so I surprised him), I got back into balance.

I just told him that I'm worrying about a lot of things,
and he (in his fashion) actually heard most of it, and responded
with such determined commitment that I softened a bit.

We're in a better place. He rushed to declare that everything was
perfect again, so I peed on the fire hydrant ("No, I guarantee we will
each be disappointed in the other again") and he responded as though
I was the Oracle of Delphi and proclaimed that I am "teaching him things."

I got to just laughing and not taking him so deadly seriously (his nonstop
narratives are nearly compulsive and truly part of who he is, so I need to
deal realistically with his scholarly reality). But I made headway and we
didn't argue.

I even taught him the active listening formula, and the difference between
a true "I statement" versus the "I feel that YOU...." stuff.

I feel better. We haven't lost hope. I told him truthfully that I've stepped
back a few paces and need a reboot, and he reaffirmed that he's all in but
didn't keep arguing with my reality. What a relief.

I think we need swimming pools.

xxoo
Hops

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 24, 2019, 01:08:55 AM
PS  We also talked about the money stuff. I told him it most definitely is one of my future worries, but it is also extremely important to me that I maintain my values and character and not get confused about it. He said he was very surprised that I'd mentioned early on that if we wound up together it was critical that he have a pre-nup. (I'd told him it was because I was affected by the paranoia of some other affluent men I'd met re. gold-digging women, and also because if his family is going to feel good, they have to KNOW that things are clear.) He's going, oh that's totally unecessary, I'm still taking care of my mother's retired housekeeper etc (which I know he is, and through a lot of other-country bureaucracy). I do not abandon people.

I believe him. But I said you need to take care of your kids' and grandkids' futures, and he said, I can. So I said I can tell you right now what I'd ask for: If you should predecease me which you're not allowed to do, I would like enough money to fix up my little house plus enough for a decent care place if I needed it one day. He suggested a staggering amount and that shut me up.

I think he really is not worried about all that. So I feel less so. If we get our communication in gear (oh god, please teach him "I messages") ... we might be ok.

He's seeing his new T tomorrow. Please send him light! He'll love it, getting to talk nonstop for 90 minutes.

Whewwww,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 24, 2019, 01:14:43 AM
CB,
It is so amazing to hear your voice here again.

It's like somebody opened a window and the oxygen just poured in, plus sunlight and lots of flower fragrances!

Thanks for the support. Can't wait to offer it back.

xxoo
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on June 24, 2019, 05:44:38 AM
Hops, I just want to say that I think your fear of ending up alone in some grotty care home is, unfortunately, a reality that many people have to face and is therefore not anything you should feel bad about fearing.  Nor do I think wanting to achieve a comfortable later stage life is the same as gold digging or just doing that 'hands in the air, look after me' thing that so many of us have fought hard against throughout our lives.

I think it's balance, as always, and you know yourself well and know what you can and can't sacrifice.  You won't throw aside every principle you have to secure a comfortable retirement; you know that and so do we.  But if it gets to the point where life with M can be a bit testing but is on the whole good and you can cope if you get a long weekend to yourself each month then I think that's okay.  Sometimes a picture perfect life doesn't match with reality and the drop between our ideal and then what we really get can be huge.  So finding a place in between the two is okay, in my opinion.

I hope that you are able to find a path through with him.  The good bits sound very good and it may well be that the mad bits are more to do with the grief (which presumably will ease in time) and maybe just even getting used to being with a woman who doesn't think he's amazing because he can throw a bit of cash around - maybe he's going to have to work at impressing you in other ways and he's not used to it.  Either way I'm sure you will keep your head and make sensible choices and it would be nice if there is a happy ending to this but equally we all know you will put the brakes on if need be xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on June 24, 2019, 08:25:39 AM
So GOOD... that rough patch was navigated delicately and successfully. Onwards!

(Had an odd idea that might help with the sex thing... I wonder if he could completely give you control over taking the initiative? That might work well for breaking the ice. Maybe it's a dumb idea, but I didn't know if you'd considered it.)
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 25, 2019, 02:42:46 PM
Thanks, Tupp...you gave me such a heartening, reality-based, thoughtful summary. (I can't believe how beautifully and kindly you do that over and over for different situations.) I appreciate it so much!

What you really do (and do and do) is increase my confidence when it's slipping. There's nothing more valuable a person can do for another...much gratitude, dear.

Amber, bless you, for always looking for where the needed tool is, knowing that a doer can do, a solution can be found for most things, plans can be redrawn, and that building never ends--whether it's within the self or the external world (that reflects the self). You're a running inspiration.

And poor M probably wouldn't dream of thinking he's in charge in that area. I've been direct and clear and am comfortable saying No as I need to. So I think when I'm ready to say Yes, he'll just be happy. (I am in no hurry.)

love y'all,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Meh on June 27, 2019, 12:45:20 PM
There is some taboo about being a "Gold Digger". I think it's very American thinking to be afraid of the label gold digger. People that I have talked to from Norway and Finland somehow can accept that money is important and think of it as a practical concern. I think this obsession with not seeming like a Gold Digger is an American culture thing.

lol I mean isn't calling someone a gold digger similar to slut shaming. Culturally men go after women all the time for looks but men don't get shamed for that. Anywho I know that's not the point of your post. I just react to the word gold digger because I think it's something messed up deep in the American Psyche. Why can women not be at least equally as shallow as guys are. Still females are supposed to be virtuous to their own detriment. I'm gonna stop rambling. Why is gold digging a social concern though, consenting adults make their own choices.

The gold diggers play came out like right before women got the right to vote it must have been interesting times.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on June 27, 2019, 12:50:07 PM
Once again, Hops, I want to mention the safe space of "making out like teenagers."

Whatever form that might take for you.... think about designating closeness, with rules in place, then see how things go with positive energy, and expectations on board.

Everyone keeps their skivvies on... yours will be comfy, and make you feel good.  Maybe jammies?  I think the important thing is to know where the lines are, and be comfortable with them... trust them.

Soft, pleasing touch is nice on backs of knees, and inside elbows.  Lovely almost kisses, brushing of lips, and forehead nuzzling are expressions of non sexual touch I feel are important, but often ignored.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 30, 2019, 02:39:02 PM
Well, dang.
All is well but I spent the night in the hospital incapable of coherent speech, feeling very strange, plus puking. Ugh. It was scary, but I had friends plus M. rally  -- come here to feed and walk pooch, sit with me in the ER, etc. And M blew me away, and a lot of my resistance melted. He simply stubbornly stayed with me and wouldn't budge, half the night and half the next day (when he wasn't sorting out Pooch).

I slipped deeper in love again because he was so genuine. A close girlfriend said later, "I know he can be a knowitall but boy, what a heart." And she never says stuff like that about people.

It was most likely a TIA (transient ischemic attack) and I have a little white dot in my brain and new meds to take. But I wound up with one of the best neurologists in the country and he said, "Yes, go to Paris anyway."

So we are--tomorrow! I feel okay and am very happy about the trip. The silver lining was the revelation of what it felt like to have someone so at my back when I was scared, speaking garbledly, and vomiting. Didn't deter him one bit, and all of his behavior was just that I'm that important to him.

Hmmm. Maybe I'm going to be able to stop looking a gift horse in the mouth. He will still drive me crazy with personality stuff sometimes, but I just got a good luck at the character beneath all that.

I'll have a tablet with me so hope to keep up with you all this week. I know if you'd been here there would've been even more Amazons at the hospital!

love you guys,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 30, 2019, 03:02:29 PM
Lighter, thanks for that advice too.
I didn't respond directly because I'm old enough that I felt a tinge embarrassed reading it...but the truth is I've been told my whole round-heeled life that I'm a wonderful lover. I get the subtle and sensuous stuff.

What I will need (and will maybe get an occasional approximation of which right now is looking like plenty) is for sweet M to calm down enough to not overwhelm me with so much of his anxiety that I can't actually relax and do any of that stuff. Baby steps. We'll start simple, I think.

Lately it's all shot into the context of life and I'm feeling pretty grateful and calm.

Okay no more sex detail! (I know, I brought it up...my bad.).

:)
Hops

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 30, 2019, 03:10:48 PM
Gboat,
That was an amazing post and I think you're right.
Culturally, Americans really amuse themselves shaming and being suspicious of women. Despite the fact that if most average women had equal economic power the whole question would be moot.

And if I were to "dig" for anything, it'd be a new bathroom and/or a safe spot in a merely decent old-age home. Not exactly baubles to keep a princess happy.

Thank you! You made me stop resonating so much to that.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on June 30, 2019, 03:15:48 PM
Well, dang.
All is well but I spent the night in the hospital incapable of coherent speech, feeling very strange, plus puking. Ugh. It was scary, but I had friends plus M. rally  -- come here to feed and walk pooch, sit with me in the ER, etc. And M blew me away, and a lot of my resistance melted. He simply stubbornly stayed with me and wouldn't budge, half the night and half the next day (when he wasn't sorting out Pooch).

I slipped deeper in love again because he was so genuine. A close girlfriend said later, "I know he can be a knowitall but boy, what a heart." And she never says stuff like that about people.

It was most likely a TIA (transient ischemic attack) and I have a little white dot in my brain and new meds to take. But I wound up with one of the best neurologists in the country and he said, "Yes, go to Paris anyway."

So we are--tomorrow! I feel okay and am very happy about the trip. The silver lining was the revelation of what it felt like to have someone so at my back when I was scared, speaking garbledly, and vomiting. Didn't deter him one bit, and all of his behavior was just that I'm that important to him.

Hmmm. Maybe I'm going to be able to stop looking a gift horse in the mouth. He will still drive me crazy with personality stuff sometimes, but I just got a good luck at the character beneath all that.

I'll have a tablet with me so hope to keep up with you all this week. I know if you'd been here there would've been even more Amazons at the hospital!

love you guys,
Hops

Oh Hops, how scary for you, I'm so sorry you had to go through this but equally very happy that M was a trooper and pulled out all the stops on this one.  It is possible to get past 'personality' stuff if the underlying bits are shiny and good.  My very dear friend's boyfriend can be a bit testing when you first get to know him (he's a bit of a know it all as well) but once you get past that he truly is the sweetest, kindest man and would genuinely give away the shirt on his back (and I think the know it all stuff is nerves with him; once you get to know him all of that recedes).  So I'm glad M was there and looked after pooch for you.  I hope you feel alright now and goodness me, have an amazing time in Paris!  Give a wave in my direction as your plane lands :) Hope it all goes well and that you have an amazing time xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on July 01, 2019, 01:22:17 AM
And isn't that part of the important stuff..... that someone you love will be there, hold your head when you're puking, pull back your hair, and make sure you're OK. 

It's lovely M stayed, and took care of pooch, and remains devoted.... it truly is important, Hops.

You have a ball in Paris.  Eat, drink, and be merry!  I hope you dance.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 01, 2019, 06:51:16 AM
Thanks, Tupp. It really was frightening. It was a mini-stroke (TIA), they believe, so I got sent home with meds and dire warnings. I can drink wine in Paris, but not daily, and only a glass. Very sobering, pun intended. I just need to be grateful and take care of life business, because with something like a stroke (my mother had one and spent her last year half paralysed) you never know when it could hit. So I feel newly vulnerable. Still, though 69 is young for this, recurrence should be preventable in most cases. General statistics are sobering because many TIAs lead to a real stroke within a year.

I honestly think I'll need to tell M that some of the struggles we've been through I've responded to with huge internal stress...a la, the kind of frustration and angst that drives up blood pressure. His incessant talking plus pressure really does affect me. Particularly when he's repeating stuff over and over. But I'll try to be kind about it and empathic and see if he's capable of modifying that a bit. I hope so.

Lighter, it was wonderful to have him at my back. At first it wasn't. I didn't want him in the ER because as I suspected he'd try to take over. I told my girlfriend that and he insisted anyway and basically shoved his way in even though she'd told him my preference was he wait in the waiting room. She likes him a ton and he charmed her (and part of her felt okay about him taking over) -- but still, it was over my objections. (I was comfortable with her there while I was gabbling but wasn't ready to be that vulnerable with him. As it turned out, I had no choice.) I didn't want him insisting doctors talk to him not me...and with his dominant personality they all kept turning to him. I finally started being blunt: M, please stop interjecting and let me talk to my doctors. It took more than once, but he did respect my wishes in the end. The effort of keeping him at bay was extra stress. So I hope we go forward with just...a calmer relationship that isn't just defined by him.

And all in all though I am still very glad and grateful and touched at his character beneath the exhaustingness. After the crisis it was a big comfort to have him in my room, and I felt really loved. When he got home he did a lot of reading up on TIA.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 01, 2019, 10:14:53 AM
Goodness HOPS... big long huge cyber-hug for you m'dear!

You tell M I said, (in my best Mom's putting her foot down voice):

When Hops tells you what she needs to feel safe, and relaxed - LISTEN TO HER and adjust accordingly. It's just as much a way of having her back, as getting all manly & in charge.

I'll butt out now. Except to point out that vulnerability is required to have authentic relationships; for both parties. It's never easy or without anxiety, fears, and stress.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: CB123 on July 01, 2019, 10:20:14 AM
I'm so glad you didnt have to go through this alone! Oh my word. That is so scarey. Sounds like you had a couple of people with you (girlfriend too!) and that helped a lot in a getting what you needed in the moment.

I hear you saying that he was wonderful and stuck with you through thick and thin--vomit and confusion. On such a primitive level that is so vital to be cared for.

I also hear you saying that it took considerable effort to get him to do as you asked in the moment, and your girlfriend tried as well and you two were minimally successful. I hear you saying that it seems that the amount of stress you were under with his incessant commentary and some of the controlling behavior had something to do with your blood pressure being elevated, perhaps making you at risk for a TIA.

It sounds like you are hoping that sitting down and having an in depth discussion about how his natural way of socializing affects you adversely. Are you hoping that he will modify his behavior, and become more quiet and thoughtful so you will be able to keep some inner equilibrium? Do you have a plan B--perhaps that you will just buck up and find new ways of dealing with it since it appears it is his personality, which is hard for a person to change? 

Pondering with you on this. Hope you have a wonderful trip! Shame about the wine, but hey! there's pastries and if I had to choose, I would choose them anyway. Actually, I do have to choose (some medical issues that have come up for me in the last year) and I dont get either one. Boo. I'm more like: no wine, and pastries are okay, but not every day--or multiple times a day.

Much anticipation for your dreamy trip,
CB
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on July 01, 2019, 01:06:56 PM
Thanks, Tupp. It really was frightening. It was a mini-stroke (TIA), they believe, so I got sent home with meds and dire warnings. I can drink wine in Paris, but not daily, and only a glass. Very sobering, pun intended. I just need to be grateful and take care of life business, because with something like a stroke (my mother had one and spent her last year half paralysed) you never know when it could hit. So I feel newly vulnerable. Still, though 69 is young for this, recurrence should be preventable in most cases. General statistics are sobering because many TIAs lead to a real stroke within a year.

I honestly think I'll need to tell M that some of the struggles we've been through I've responded to with huge internal stress...a la, the kind of frustration and angst that drives up blood pressure. His incessant talking plus pressure really does affect me. Particularly when he's repeating stuff over and over. But I'll try to be kind about it and empathic and see if he's capable of modifying that a bit. I hope so.

Lighter, it was wonderful to have him at my back. At first it wasn't. I didn't want him in the ER because as I suspected he'd try to take over. I told my girlfriend that and he insisted anyway and basically shoved his way in even though she'd told him my preference was he wait in the waiting room. She likes him a ton and he charmed her (and part of her felt okay about him taking over) -- but still, it was over my objections. (I was comfortable with her there while I was gabbling but wasn't ready to be that vulnerable with him. As it turned out, I had no choice.) I didn't want him insisting doctors talk to him not me...and with his dominant personality they all kept turning to him. I finally started being blunt: M, please stop interjecting and let me talk to my doctors. It took more than once, but he did respect my wishes in the end. The effort of keeping him at bay was extra stress. So I hope we go forward with just...a calmer relationship that isn't just defined by him.

And all in all though I am still very glad and grateful and touched at his character beneath the exhaustingness. After the crisis it was a big comfort to have him in my room, and I felt really loved. When he got home he did a lot of reading up on TIA.

Hugs
Hops

I hope he's able to adjust, Hops, I guess for men of his generation there were many things expected of them and they've probably not done the internal battle that a lot of women have had to do in order to be heard.  I'm sorry to hear that the pressures have led to this health situation although it makes sense; stress is such a huge thing and can cause so many hidden dangers.  I hope you are able to have that talk and find that balance in there; he's not out of the woods when it comes to a Tupp arse kicking yet!!  Lol, I hope you are feeling okay and that the Paris trip is both relaxing and wonderful xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Meh on July 04, 2019, 06:04:03 PM
That is so scary Hops.  When you go to Paris get some Cassis Sorbet if you see it. And if you can only drink one glass of wine then  it's encouragement not to waste time on mediocre wine. Be adamant that nobody gives you table wine. We have good wine in the US too but we don't have all that Architecture and art. 

I always wanted to go to Musée de l’Orangerie with those big long Monet paintings that take up the whole room.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 05, 2019, 01:35:43 AM
Good advice, Boat!
M is all over wine and every glass is amazing. I will keep my eye for cassis sorbet today! We're going to do a mellow boat down the Seine. Day before yesterday we spent in Giverny so I wish I could have brought you!
We had dinner by the Sorbonne yesterday where he's lectured, and spent a good deal of time at Notre Dame, just trying to absorb the sight.
We arrived in Paris just after the heat wave broke and it's been beyond gorgeous since.

Lemme say though that the jet lag!s been Brutal, took both of us until today to feel fairly normal and tomorrow we leave! But it's also been wonderful and brought us closer (not counting day one, when I was so exhausted I was Not Pleasant). Since then though we've done really well. He feels like a boy again and I'm enjoying his company. Finding my rusty French again is fun. Most meaningful was having dinner with my friend!s daughters and their families in Montmartre. I didn't get to say goodbye to their mother, my close friend from age 17, and reconnecting with these girls almost felt like being a mother again. They were jut wonderful. The husband is a historian so he and M had a wonderful time.

hugs
HOps
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Meh on July 05, 2019, 02:23:09 PM
That's great Hops. Glad you are having fun. 
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on July 05, 2019, 02:49:10 PM
I'm so happy to read about your trip, HOPS!  Keep sharing, and consider eating at Le Souffle IF you can't think of somewhere else to eat.  I always enjoy that place when in Paris.  https://www.tripadvisor.com/Restaurant_Review-g187147-d719430-Reviews-Le_Souffle-Paris_Ile_de_France.html

There's fancier eating establishments, but I always make sure to visit this not too fancy place at least once.  The blue facade breaths happiness into my heart when I see it.  The food is comforting, and yummy!  I always feel the wait staff cares, and wants to make me happy: )

YAY! YAY! to having a nice time, not too hot, in Paris, HOPS!

I'm so glad: )

Lighter



Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 06, 2019, 07:56:44 AM
E Gads... I think maybe we're all about a 1000 miles OT from the purpose of the board, these days. Everyone is doing so much better than years ago. The contrast is positively heartening.

When do you take off for the 2nd leg of your trip Hops? Still feeling fine I hope?
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 06, 2019, 04:19:45 PM
Thanks, all, so much. Where else could I talk about all this stuff and be so understood?

All in all, M was amazing inParis. And we did have that talk...I told him I wasn't blaming him but fear the nonstop talking is maybe a compulsion, and that because I'm wired to be very reactive to speech in my presence and I simply can't not listen, and I'm reacting with a lot of stress and just not sure I can handle it long term. He got a lot quieter and I expressed myself more and we got very playful and just had a joyous time. Even joked about it a lot. And then ironically he came down with laryngitis  yesterday! Speaking of hints from the universe. But it was an amazing week, highlight a day near the Sorbonne. Notre Dame was very sad.

Today he's soaking up the sun on the balcony of his fancy visiting professors suite in Jerusalem, starts his lectures next week.

 I came to Oslo today and though I lost my cell phone, am having a beautiful time with old friend Erik and family. Their house is on an island a block from the king!s summer home. We could tell he's there because of the sole guard! Erik's met him and says he's very nice while introverted, and folks really like the queen. Strange neighbors! Stunning place all around...their house is from another time, full of generations of his family stuff and hers (Russian). His wife (retired film maker) and daughter (opera singer now teaching voice) made an amazing huge dinner with fish and lots of Vegs plus huge local strawberries for dessert. Tomorrow we're taking the streetcar downtown and I'm going to buy a warm sweater...after perfect-warmth Paris, Oslo's nearly starting fall. So gorgeous here, first time back since 1960. Really grateful to be here, dreamed of it a long time.

Thanks for the Le Soufflé suggestion, Lighter, but since M practically,lives for the gourmet thing and has 50 favorites, I was happy to let him choose. To say we ate well is an understatement.

Tupp, M is now plotting a Guggenheim so we could spend a year here, and if that happens you and I will meet, promise!

GBoat, thanks for the good wishes. You've no idea how much your perspective helped me enjoy all this. And Amber, you said something so insightful about respecting restraint being as much having my back as taking charge. I'm going to find a time to tell him that (but will pretend I thought of it, okay?)

CB, you sure heard me. Every piece of it. Thank you so much.

Love y'all LOTS,
Hops

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 10, 2019, 10:05:49 AM
Made it home in one piece though yesterday was, not to exaggerate, a hellish marathon. I manifested M's nasty cold the day I left Oslo and was sooooo sick by the time I got back to Paris. One night at an airport hotel (very inconsistent directions from staff resulted in riding a train back and forth extra time) and then yesterday:

Up at 830am Paris time
To airport at 10
Security (ain't what it used to be!) and then flight at 1:00
Arrived hub city at 430 Eastern Time
Five. Hour. Layover. Siiiiiick--whole box of tissues sick, coughing.
Left hub 10pm EST
Arrived home past midnight
At house half-hour later

I can't even do the math but can somebody tell me how many straight hours I was awake streaming nose, coughing and spluttering (feeling guilty about others) on the airplanes? Only exception was when I got chills too and the lady across the way gave me an extra blanket and I got all wrapped up in that, refastened the seat belt, passed out for 30 minutes, then woke up in turbulence to realize I had to pee and felt feverishly disoriented, got all tangled up in the two blankets plus headset wires and couldn't get the belt open fast enough and...you guessed it, old lady nightmare.

Fortunately, nobody else noticed --most were asleep-- and the flight attendant kindly fetched my suitcase so I could change into clean pants. DAMN. (And you guys are the lucky winners! Not sure I'll tell anybody ELSE about that.) That said, it was also one of many Blanche Dubois moments -- relying on the kindness of strangers. It may have been being sick but I really think it's just that I'm older than I was before and travel's changed a lot. And loads of people answered questions even with language barriers and were helpful and kind. Talked to the sweetest Norwegian chaplain on the plane from Oslo to Paris and he was a GIFT.

Missed a train in Norway and spent a long chilly time on the platform and lost my cell phone.

Other than that? The trip was wonderful and I'd do it again in a heartbeat (M sez we're going to). Only change I'd insist on is I really will not travel that many hours in a row again. Even if it means another night at a hotel. That was too much.

But I made it and am lolling around with Pooch, who was happy to see me but also mellow and relaxed and clearly had been treated super well by the sitter, who left my little house clean as a whistle, with flowers. She even cleaned a disgusting birdbath. Another friend got in groceries and a couple others checked on me by email. I had to let them know what was happening with me but once I had, several showed they cared. I feel LUUUUUUUUUUUUUCKY. And grateful.

One disappointment...one friend of a couple years dislikes my most blunt close long-term friend, who was critical of her performance in a key church position. Okay, those things happen. But I allowed the two of them to intersect at my house (I thought I'd mentioned the blunt one was stopping by but the other friend insists I didn't, and even if I had warned her, how could I not then ask her if she needed to go, or some such avoidance strategem because she'd been so hurt by Ms. Blunt's critical email?). The newer friend has turned my lack of attention to her fragile feelings into a cause for not speaking to me for a while (though she briefly did about the stroke and another committee thing). That is a pink flag for me. For me, a squabble between two friends does not force me to choose one of them, and that may be what she wants. She said she'll be in touch this month, so we'll see.

Have to get an echocardiogram Friday and also have a heart monitor put on that I have to wear for 30 freaking days. But I'm glad I have great care, good teaching hospital here.

Sorry to be so self-absorbed but glad y'all are willing to read it!

love
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: CB123 on July 10, 2019, 01:14:36 PM
Hops, sounds like it was a wonderful whirl-wind, but your travel stories made me get sweaty palms!

And I dont know how we both get the same terrible cold--I've been laid up for a week, and I can't even imagine how I would have traveled as well as you did.

Wishing you a very peaceful recovery in your little house,
CB
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on July 10, 2019, 02:58:18 PM
Lordy, Hops what  nightmare.  Sick.  Lost cell phone.  Missed trains.  Marathon travel schedules.  I'm amazed you came out of it as chipper as you are.  Well done!

About the peeing your pants..... it happens to everyone, I think, if they'll just admit it.  I tend to put it off, and do just
one
more
thing, then run out of time, when I could have made it if I'd just taken care of business.

Of course, you were sick, cocooned, and sabotaged by the jostling and wires.... it's a difficult thing to get into an airplane bathroom when things are going well, IME.

Sorry your friends problem is creating angst for you.  It's not your problem.... you didn't cause it, and you can't fix it.  Let them have it, and stay focused on yourself.

I bet Pooch is thrilled to the moon to have you back!

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 11, 2019, 12:38:49 PM
Eh... let all that go Hops and take care your cold. It'll still be there to deal with, if it's important. Did M come back with you or is he traveling separately because of his obligations?
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 11, 2019, 03:36:42 PM
Thanks, CB...I still sound gross and am coughing some but feel MUCH better. Not leaving the house, just lazing about. Tomorrow I do have to go out...bank, echocardiogram and cardiac monitor install. Then I'll come back and resume lazing.
One friend dropped by (the one who raced me to the ER and was there for it) but I've told everybody else I'm not up to going out or meeting up quite yet.

Lighter, you are right...Pooch was clearly delighted I returned but got over it much too fast. She was so mellowed out that I considered her underwhelmed. Tee hee. It's actually the best possible reaction, no clinging, no acting traumatized. I'd use that sitter again in a heartbeat. And you're right, that trip was intense! (But wonderful.) I did miss her though, and it was lovely to have her to think about.

Amber, M and I left Paris on the same day but from two different terminals. Me to Norway, him to Jerusalem for 3 days of guest lectures at the university, then he's heading to Istanbul as he's never been and wants to see certain antiquities and the Blue Dome, then for a few days with old friends in Madrid where he also once had a house. He returns in a week.

I'll be glad to see him but am enjoying the break, too. We've done some really good emailing, I think. And he left me the key to his fabulous cloistered neighborhood pool so I can take friends there. They can swim and I'll enjoy watching them from the shade or stick my legs in (doubt I can swim with a monitor on!).

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on July 15, 2019, 01:29:20 PM
The trip sounds amazing, Hops, the journey home sounds like hell, bless you!  I'm glad Pooch was so happy and well looked after and that friends organised home coming stuff for you.  Are you feeling a bit better now?  I'm glad you and M enjoyed yourselves on the trip; it sounded like it could have gone either way because of what had gone on before :)  So I'm glad it went the better way of the two :)  I hope you've been able to get your feet up and recover a bit now xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 16, 2019, 09:48:34 AM
Feeling much better, thanks Tupp!
Got out again yesterday, took a friend to M's pool, and except for one mother and child for the first half, we wound up with the entire place to ourselves. Ridiculous, on a hot day in July. It was gorgeous. I just kicked from the side and then simply walked back and forth in the water (could splash but couldn't submerge the monitor) but it was wonderful. Residual cough is on its way out.

M comes home the 18th and has written me lovely travelogue emails daily, and is so eager to see me again. Me too. I am also aware that after the stroke, I will be more at peace about setting and holding boundaries and not letting him power over, ooze through, cajole or frantic-ize his way across them. I think that will be essential to building a healthy relationship going forward, and despite his moments of discomfort or frustration, I think he should be able to grow and get calmer. If he isn't capable of that growth, then that's another decision for another day. But at least I feel clear on what my job is. It really is to take care of myself, and that includes within our relationship.

I'm going to be happy to see him too. And I feel more open and affectionate toward him because of the two intense things we've just shared: the hospitalization and the trip. I have a feeling we've each learned some important things and time will tell me whether that's true and continuing.

Appreciate you checking! It means SO much to have this place to offload it all and I get such wisdom back.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 16, 2019, 10:21:51 AM
I was just reflecting that it's important to have a group of Amazon ladies, to run all the crazy relationship stuff past for a 2nd opinion. For me, anyway. I have such a strong and wayward imagination I kinda fear deceiving myself. Especially in that first flush of excitement about "this is really happening". And in my case, happening so fast, I swear my head is spinning in Linda Blair fashion. LOL.

And then, that first moment of peace settles in and the relationship seems more "cozy" than anything else, and one can't believe one deserves such good fortune. But of course, rationally, there is a long list of reasons WHY we do. It doesn't diminish the gratitude one bit.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Meh on July 17, 2019, 07:18:14 PM
How did the follow up with the doc go?
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 17, 2019, 08:39:30 PM
Thanks for asking, G!
Last thing was on Friday, getting a cardiac monitor (30 day) put on and also an echocardiogram. Haven't heard the results yet.

I don't have to go back to the Stroke Center for the bigger followup until October, so they must not be too worried about me. But maybe once I mail the monitor back in they'll get in touch if there's anything alarming.

I'm betting not, but that my task is to do what I know I need to do for general health (diet, exercise, etc). The specific thing I'm thinking about is not being so emotionally reactive to M's stuff. I realize there's nothing malicious, but when even a good man slips into entitlement or "I think I'm in charge" behavior, something inside me reacts like a trapped weasel. I think that goes all the way back to my brother, and is something I'm going to talk about with the T.

Surely my emotional state is something I can do something about too, not just my body.

I'll keep y'all posted. But I'm feeling much better and looking forward to the heat wave passing so I feel like walking again. Meanwhile, there's an indoor track nearby (no excuses) and even M's pool.

Been lazy all week getting over jet lag and cold, but I pick him up at the airport tomorrow night and think that'll give me some energy too. He thinks it'll take him a week too...in your 70s it's different, no more one-day turnaround.

Several months left for swimming and I'd be a fool not to take advantage of it.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on July 17, 2019, 08:56:33 PM
Splashing around in a nice pool sounds really great, Hops.

Maybe make spa water with watermelon, and cucumber, my favorites.

I'm glad you're feeling better: )

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 18, 2019, 06:18:15 AM
Smart Hops...

Yes, I think too, that the internal emotional upsets are just as much stress - and even harder on us - than manual labor. I'll bet this dive into those issues is going to be very freeing for you.

Water forms of therapy are some of the easiest on old muscles and joints (impacts on joints causes so much wear & tear on the cushioning) and it's also relaxing and feels great in this heat.

Glad your partner in fun is returning soon!
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 18, 2019, 10:50:38 AM
Thanks, ((((Amber)))). I think you're right and think my surges of fear and self protection have probably been accompanied by BP spikes all along. The test results refer to "embolism" which I think is the fancy word for "clot". Hence, blood thinners. But I can't imagine that feeling THAT upset (as I was when he swanned into what he perceived as D rescue) didn't have an effect on my body, my blood vessels, my BP.

Hence, calm. Swimming. Mellow times with M and should he become too un-mellow, my feet must take me home or into retreat. I don't know how well this New Me (hopefully) will go, but I am going to try to explain it to him pre-emptively and kindly.

He has a looooooong way to go in terms of self-knowledge. The good thing is that he reacted to his first T session with interest and excitement and I think if it engages his intellect first (which it has) then his emotional habits underneath will eventually come up enough for him to see them.

It's a large bet, and I can't be sure. But all in all, I'm happy I'll be seeing him at the airport tonight. I'm hoping I'm not back on here in days or weeks all crushed about a new episode of the old behavior. Having just had a wee stroke, I would see that as a challenge for me to put survival above relationship.

(Then again, in fairness, I need to remember that I had a similar though much milder episode of this--not being able to retrieve words--a couple years before we met. So M is just one new among pre-existing factors that will either support my wellbeing or undermine it. And that'll involve taking in the whole picture, best I can. I will need to watch, remain calm, look at my life and our interactions and take it from there....)

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 20, 2019, 09:05:16 AM
Maybe it's different past experiences, or different personalities or both... but when I say I have to pull back from Buck and sort out something that's my job to deal with, he lets me go do. And vice versa. That said, 24 hrs doesn't go by without a check-in.

I think I stumbled over something important in yesterday's farm post. About stop struggling. I'm not entirely sure what's important about that (the heat is really affecting me; as well as adjusting to his late night schedule) but I'll see what it is, eventually.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 20, 2019, 11:41:26 AM
That's so wonderful. I can't imagine you being with a whiner or a clutcher.

I have breathed through some of that with M and as I mentioned, it was nearly an end to us. But he also breathed through some of my trapped-weasel fury (over entitlement and stuff he does without thinking).

After all this breathing, we seem (so far) to be coming to the surface and looking at each other with less fear and more trust. Both the hospital and the trip brought us closer.

I hope B's ordeal will knit you two even closer in ways that help you both endure. He is a very lucky man. And it shows that even on a mountain, a woman who wants love can find it.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 21, 2019, 11:54:57 AM
Oh... I think he's been stalking me for some time. Like years. I just paid no attention because I had Mike, moving, starting over on my plate... and he had 2 years of 5 surgeries and all the complications. But in hindsight, I can see now what I didn't notice then - and what I find interesting, is that over the years, we have reached out to one another at various times for different things. He never pressed; just bided his time. And I frankly, wasn't available for different reasons over that time - but I instinctively knew he was a very nice man and he demonstrated that without presuming. I HAD had some fleeting "thoughts" but I didn't seriously entertain them.

When all the guys were scaring the crap out of me, about what could go wrong with the bobcat - it was Buck that convinced me I could master this. When I needed advice about this or that... he was able to explain it to me in a way that made me confident I could manage it. And when I got stuck or confused, he bailed me out and even SHOWED me what he was doing and why it needed to be done.

The sense I have, is that he's been lonely a long time and had about given up finding a partner that understands what kind of man he is and doesn't want to change that. My just being there and caring - is the most important thing for him. I think I can do that, without smothering him. He and I are the same species of human being, I think.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 26, 2019, 12:34:37 PM
Having fun this week Hops? Feeling better?
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 27, 2019, 10:46:48 AM
Thanks, hon!
I'm better, though heartily sick of the chest monitor, which itches like fury and means I can only walk back and forth in the pool (just beneath-boob high). Maddening. And the heat's getting to me.

But...all is well with M. He seems to have calmed down a lot, I think maybe because he's feeling more secure with me. We're having dinner tonight.

The heat has been a brutal reminder of humans not governing themselves and I'm pretty depressed about politics.

Other than well, doing fine.

Went to visit my dying friend yesterday in a nearby city. M drove me and went to the museum while she and I had our visit. Sad and poignant but I'm glad I got to see her. On our own, M and I had fun...lunching at a great Greek place, walking in our favorite district, buying flowers for her from a lovely young man.

Will report more later...and check in about B. on your farm life thread.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on July 27, 2019, 10:34:52 PM
Sorry about your friend, Hops. 

Politics depressing, I agree.  Last night I dreamed I had to run for President, and really resented having to prepare for debates.  Trump walked in, put his hand on the top of my head and squeezed hard.

I dropped down, aimed with intention, and punched him in the boys with an upper cut, using my knees.  It bugged me all day...that Trump touched me.

I'm glad you're getting along with M. 

Lighter

It
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 28, 2019, 12:51:26 AM
Oh but I'm so glad about your dream because of the way you touched HIM!!!

For all of us, that punch -- I thank you!

There is hope as long as everyone gets off their couches and votes!!!

Thanks for that image, I'll cherish it.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on July 29, 2019, 02:03:49 PM
Yup yup yup... we have to get out and vote, Hops.

Have to.

I always go early, and there's hardly any line.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on August 02, 2019, 02:20:39 AM
Thanks, hon!
I'm better, though heartily sick of the chest monitor, which itches like fury and means I can only walk back and forth in the pool (just beneath-boob high). Maddening. And the heat's getting to me.

But...all is well with M. He seems to have calmed down a lot, I think maybe because he's feeling more secure with me. We're having dinner tonight.

The heat has been a brutal reminder of humans not governing themselves and I'm pretty depressed about politics.

Other than well, doing fine.

Went to visit my dying friend yesterday in a nearby city. M drove me and went to the museum while she and I had our visit. Sad and poignant but I'm glad I got to see her. On our own, M and I had fun...lunching at a great Greek place, walking in our favorite district, buying flowers for her from a lovely young man.

Will report more later...and check in about B. on your farm life thread.

Hugs
Hops

I'm glad you got to see your friend, Hops, and that you and M are having a good time.  I hope the monitor comes off soon!  Sounds like a real pain, although necessary.  But will be nice for you not to have to think about it and keep it out of the water. xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on August 02, 2019, 04:49:36 PM
How are you feeling, Hops?

Are you able to get feedback from the monitor, or do you have to wait till it comes off?

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on August 03, 2019, 01:45:07 AM
Thanks, Lighter.
I'm feeling okay, though less energetic than I'd like.

It hit me this evening that I'm on a big dose of statins after several years off the very low dose I used to take. And that depletes Co Q-10, which I'd forgotten about. I will get back on that tomorrow and stay with it, should help I hope.

Only other issue is the damn itching...eventually the adhesive gets through even the SkinCote, which is essentially liquid vinyl. Ick. I have to swab on two layers of the stuff to tolerate the monitor patch for a day or two, and my skin is miserable beneath it. Welts, and one spot nearly raw. But there's no choice.

Last day to wear it is the 11th...then I mail it all in. No idea how long it takes for the analysis to come in.

I do feel a bit worried about the result. I'm just praying I don't have afib, which would require strong blood thinners for life. Would really like to avoid that, but I'll deal.

Thanks for checking!

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Meh on August 03, 2019, 03:56:07 AM
Ouch, I don't know what helps adhesive reactions. I think some people have real allergies to the glue. Or maybe it's an irritant.
Benadryl? Probably wouldn't help. Hydrocortisone cream around the edges?

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on August 03, 2019, 04:05:59 AM
Thanks, Lighter.
I'm feeling okay, though less energetic than I'd like.

It hit me this evening that I'm on a big dose of statins after several years off the very low dose I used to take. And that depletes Co Q-10, which I'd forgotten about. I will get back on that tomorrow and stay with it, should help I hope.

Only other issue is the damn itching...eventually the adhesive gets through even the SkinCote, which is essentially liquid vinyl. Ick. I have to swab on two layers of the stuff to tolerate the monitor patch for a day or two, and my skin is miserable beneath it. Welts, and one spot nearly raw. But there's no choice.

Last day to wear it is the 11th...then I mail it all in. No idea how long it takes for the analysis to come in.

I do feel a bit worried about the result. I'm just praying I don't have afib, which would require strong blood thinners for life. Would really like to avoid that, but I'll deal.

Thanks for checking!

Hugs
Hops

Hops, it does sound very irritating!  It's a long time to have to put up with it - minor discomfort is alright for a few days but longer than that and I find it becomes all I can think about - very annoying!  Do they have to leave it on for so long to see if there are patterns or something like that?  Whatever the reason I will keep my fingers crossed that it's all processed soon and you get the results through.  I find not know the outcome harder to deal with than knowing, even if it's not news I want to hear!  So I hope it's all sorted out soon - and that you get your Co-Q thingy sorted as well! xx xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on August 04, 2019, 09:21:50 AM
Hang in there Hops! Not that many days left now. And it's a lot of data for the doc.

How are things with M? You guys doing some fun stuff?
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Meh on August 04, 2019, 11:22:18 PM
Yeah at least the docs are being thorough.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on August 06, 2019, 06:16:08 PM
Just keep that monitor dry, and don't stop swimming, Hops.

Whatever happens, it's going to be OK.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on August 12, 2019, 03:46:54 PM
Thanks, ((((Lighter)))) -- the damn thing's off me as of yesterday!

Oy, men. M really stepped in it this morning when his morning email included a picture of a bullfight and a totally cerebral explanation of the "crucial role" horses have played in history as "mediators" between the human and animal worlds. He got back a diatribe about how cock fighting, bear baiting and dog fights might have their interpreters as well, how they are "mediators" rather than torture victims, and that bullfighting revolts me at the most profound level and thus I do not care what it symbolises. Ooof. Not nice words for a scholar who deals in the abstract all day but jeez!

I had told him, humorously, at dinner last night how beautiful I find a horse's nostril -- one of the most beautiful things in the world -- soft as velvet, warm, full of sweet oaty breath they'll blow on your cheek. I am a person who ceased riding horses (having loved it for years) when one day I thought about how there was no good reason to subject a horse to me on its back. Light went on, boots went off. But I still adore being near them. Had an amazing experience on college graduation day when I was crushed it was over (four happiest years), went down to the stables, stood by the pasture fence and started sobbing. A horse I didn't even know, way across the field, raised its head, trotted all the way over to me, bent its head and placed its forehead against mine, and stood there stock-still until I was done sobbing. Then went away.

I ain't the right person to send some abstract defense of bullfighting before my caffeine has kicked in! (I'd also told him how when I was 14 in Madrid I was very upset that my father and brother went to the bullfight. I'd refused and stayed in the hotel because I knew what happened to the bull.) I was surprised M went there.

Just rambled through it with my T and got more clarity on how differently we see the world. Fortunately, once you scrape away the scholar there's a sweet heart inside. Whew.

xxoo
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on August 12, 2019, 07:18:19 PM
Oh, sweet animals, Hops.  Your horse story made me cry!

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on August 13, 2019, 12:00:18 PM
Oh Hops - lovely horse story! I love them too.
And it is SOOOO true about how men & women see the world differently.

We have the patience and curiosity to pick through our emotional chamber pots trying to divine the secrets of the universe through them...

While men, simply see a tree = shade, renewable fuel, nuts or something that's edible, or something that is a comfort to them when they return to the abode covered in grease, mud and supposed glory (in the world of men). They don't believe there's much value in picking through feelings for secrets.

(Greatly oversimplifying/stereotyping here.)

Hahahahahahahaaa. God's last laugh on how he designed humans I guess. But it's also a clue, to us who are trying to puzzle out how to live with each other, as peacefully as possible.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on August 13, 2019, 02:24:22 PM
I think you're right, Amber. (And Light!)

Did I mention that he raved about the suckling pig he ate in Madrid? He cringed a little in my direction after he said it...but his appetite for taste knows no bounds.

I'm struggling (again) with my hesitation around intimacy (physical), for which he has waited a long time now. Working on it with my T. Got brave enough to tell him how certain behaviors freeze me shut (grabbing for it, whining for it, obsessively talking about it--which he recently stopped cold, I think after visiting his own T).

My problem is how long it takes me to thaw. He had unintentionally clueless and off-putting approaches for so long I feared it'd destroy my attraction for him completely. Came close, but in fact it hasn't. The nice thing is I'm motivated more by love (wanna make him happy) than I was before. So the time is coming and though I'm sure it'll turn out all right, I'm apprehensive. I felt SO much discomfort for so long, and then he relaxed and stopped pestering, but I sense the vacation from pressure is ending...and I'm nervous. Part of me wants to get it over with, so we can move forward with our plans.

So as delicately as I can put it, that's it. I don't need how-to, just encouragement for the emotional side, that I can stay balanced within myself.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on August 13, 2019, 07:22:56 PM
Oh, Hops.

I hope you can enjoy his enjoyment in you.  I hope his amazement, and attraction makes you feel amazing, and attractive.  Powerful, and seductive.  In control, and grateful that he's so attracted to you, for so many things, in so many ways.  You're well rounded, intellectual, matched so well in so many ways.... this male/female magnet is a small part of a bigger picture... not THE PICTURE.

In other words... I hope you can have a glass or two of wine, get into something that makes you feel powerful/at your best, then let him discover more amazing things about you, for surely he'll be amazed no matter what you do.  (But he can't whine or whatever it is that drives you nuts.)  He just can't. 

::shaking head::  Both Ts need to go over this, with both of you guys, and it needs to be something that's not happening anywhere AROUND intimacy.  Appears he's surfing pretty good right now.

I'm in favor of undies on, making out like teenagers for a bit, myself.  Agreement up front, lots of in small steps.  Maybe you've already climbed those smaller hills in Paris? 

Worst case scenario, take a nerve pill, and try to be amazed at his amazement.... stay curious, and nonjudgmental as you can.  You might be super surprised in a happy way!

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on August 14, 2019, 12:54:44 PM
Thanks, Lighter -- warm words well received.

I do have to confess I noticed the how-tos, though: drink wine, negligee, nerve pill, whatever.

I honestly DON'T need/want how-to suggestions (got that part) but I was happy and comforted by your great suggestions for the emotional side. That's where I've been wobbly.

Thank you!

Hugs,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on August 14, 2019, 01:26:57 PM
You'll be OK Hops. It's all about being really close to someone and showing empathy and compassion with touch. Start there and you'll discover it's a lot more than that. One thing naturally leading to another, as is usually the case. Those are really good feelings, IMO.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on August 14, 2019, 05:37:38 PM
 I wrote "something that makes you feel powerful/at your best."

I certainly did not write "negligee."    
::nod::.







Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on August 14, 2019, 07:10:10 PM
Got it!

:)

I really did perk up with the emotional strengthening you gave, ((((Light)))).

Thanks, hon.

Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on August 14, 2019, 11:19:00 PM
You really seem to connect with him,  Hops.  This is so different from your last relationship.  I hope that's real for you.  Every day.

Also, you can ask for what you want.  You can steer this thing into your comfort zone... maybe?

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on August 15, 2019, 01:48:29 AM
Thanks much, Lighter.

I can. I do. I think I spent months trying to get across what I DON'T want that I couldn't focus well on the nuances. But thank god, he got it, and backed off the relentless repetitive pressure that was driving me nuts.

Somehow, I still believed it was his anxiety, nothing horrible. Just that, yet it was still driving me crazy. Then...he went into therapy. And almost overnight, he relaxed and cut out most of it, and then I told him another piece, and found that when I said directly (just as you're recommending) "I don't like that" -- he stopped doing whatever it was.

One small thing I should've spoken up about earlier was his habit of taking my wrist or hand unexpectedly when I was walking past him. I know he felt he was just reaching out to me, acting on impulse, but it made me feel trapped and jumpy. Sure enough, I opened my mouth and explained that...and he's never done it since.

Our communication is waaaay better and there's just a deeper connection now. I'm amazed but since HE relaxed (and I think therapy is the reason), I am relaxing more too. And that's gradually bringing me to what he wanted in the first place!

Men.
Love him but what a challenge it was...I had a lot of resistance to work through.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on August 15, 2019, 06:02:37 AM
Hops, I have absolutely no advice to give you because I have 'been without' for so long now I wouldn't have a clue what to do now!  But I am really glad that you and M have/are working through things and that the things that were bugging you seem to have receded (bull fighting and suckling pigs aside!).  But it's great that he hears you and is willing to work at things and make changes.  I'm really happy for you and I hope that at some point it just feels 'okay' and the nervousness dispels a bit xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on August 15, 2019, 12:11:56 PM
Hops:

I'm just tucking into the book FACING CODEPENDENCE, What it is, Where it comes from, How it sabotages our lives by Pia Mellody, and the part about feeling resentment....

feeling resentment....

feeling resentment.... struck a chord, for myself, when I read it this morning. I SEE that in my life.  I've lived it.  I'm so very tired of it inhabiting my life in ways I wasn't even aware of, but see when I examine it... or have it pointed out for me. 

It struck a chord reading your post about M taking your wrist or hand, not that it's applicable. 

SO MANY CHORDS, really, and

The words "I feel resentful" were the buzzwords I spoke JUST before my T suggested the Codependency books, and now I see WHY she suggested them.  I wish I'd read them long ago.   I wish we could directly input this information into children when they're in grade school, but I digress. 

I'm not saying you don't have a right to feel whatever it is coming up, for certainly you do.  I'm suggesting there might be something underneath it, that's observable, and helpful to discern.

Or not.

You're speaking up, expressing how you feel, asking for what you want, and asking M to stop doing certain things is HUGE,  Hops. 

Those pesky boundaries, right?

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on August 20, 2019, 11:30:55 PM
Turns out, the secret was

BUBBLE

BATH.

:)

A happy
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on August 21, 2019, 10:41:41 AM
 :D :D :D :D :D

(((hops)))
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on August 24, 2019, 12:54:33 AM
Amber, had this in reply to you on Codependence thread but realized it goes here.

M and I looked at a house for fun and have talked about it a bit, and he indicated I could start learning what's out there since he has to start teaching next week, and I realized I wasn't sure about the parameters. So I didn't make it complicated, just asked: What is the range you're comfortable spending and what square footage? So he told me, so now I can focus. It all has to wait until he sells his condo in San Jose (CR), which might take a while, since he doesn't touch principal. And that's good to know too. (It helps that we've already had the money talk: it's simple for us because he's got it, I don't, and he's ready to spend it on our life and even to support me. I have my SS so won't be completely dependent (except for travel but he has literally hundreds of thousands of FF miles so I can accept the rest more easily) and after we move in together I'll have some rent coming in from this house. But in the big picture, he's going to buy the house and that simplifies things.) He's even open to the idea of a wing on my current house, which I'd love, but I doubt that'll work out.

Not worrying about it but it's a new phase for us. Complicated but happy to think about. I'm in no rush, and leaving this sweet hideaway will be hard. Likely nothing could happen before spring or next summer anyway. So I'll savor my time here while I can.

Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on August 24, 2019, 03:16:13 AM
Turns out, the secret was

BUBBLE

BATH.

:)

A happy
Hops

Aw, Hops, I hope that means what I think it means!  Who'd have thought bubble bath was the key :)  I'm glad this has become a happy phase now rather than a worrisome one :) xx xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on August 24, 2019, 03:27:54 PM
Bath time is lovely, Hops.  I'm so happy for you: )
Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on August 24, 2019, 10:05:42 PM
Thanks, guys. Blush.

We just went downtown for cafe dinner out, with Pooch. She does her diva thing (with the melting brown eyes that look rimmed in eyeliner) and collected pats in all directions from our table. I mean, people melt at her face and stop in their tracks to come pat her, it's so fun...

We ate and talked and enjoyed good wine and M was just waxing romantic nonstop, narrating our relationship and how happy he is. He was in good form. We even looked at another house he was quite enthused about and I could definitely adapt to. Fun!

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on August 25, 2019, 07:33:04 AM
"Narrating"... O.M.G.... (ooooops).
(blush......) I get it now.***


Hops, you and M seem to really have an affinity for water. Maybe find a house near a babbling stream or overlooking a river? I took 64 close to your city a couple time from the beach to the little cabin in WV. The babbling brook feature ought to be pretty common out that way too. Are you looking to stay in the city or get a little more remote? I'm betting there are lots of "best of both worlds" - close to the city's support services and yet out where it's quieter and not so hectic. Looking can be LOTS of fun.



*** more on what I now realize I've been doing; and how that's occurred in the farm thread.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on August 26, 2019, 01:39:34 AM
Fortunately, there are plenty of quiet leafy neighborhoods right in the city where you can enjoy your pet deer (or chickens!) and have lots of nature. It's a town with nature embedded in it.

I've lived in the mountains and in several remote areas (the most: Appalachian Kentucky, where without 4WD you literally couldn't leave the holler in winter) but have no craving for that any more. Part of it's aging, part of it's cowardice (nice to be near a hospital if stroke ever revisits, every minute counts to limit damage). And...I discovered after years on mountainsides or eastern shores that I really do need to perceive my neighbors' nearness. It's comforting to me. I don't want racket, of course, but I don't crave isolation or massive privacy. Indoors, sure. But not when I'm walking; I crave the human landscape as much as the other...and it's a 20 minute drive to the most beautiful mountains I've ever known.

IN town, definitely. And fortunately, M. feels the same way. There's a river right through the city anyone can access from various paths, but living ON water is unlikely. We're not going to spend THAT much! (Though I did point out to him at one house today where he could put in a pool...). His own glimpse of lake is through a very overgrown woods that is currently smothering his house, so not very soothing.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on August 31, 2019, 05:36:41 AM
Fortunately, there are plenty of quiet leafy neighborhoods right in the city where you can enjoy your pet deer (or chickens!) and have lots of nature. It's a town with nature embedded in it.

I've lived in the mountains and in several remote areas (the most: Appalachian Kentucky, where without 4WD you literally couldn't leave the holler in winter) but have no craving for that any more. Part of it's aging, part of it's cowardice (nice to be near a hospital if stroke ever revisits, every minute counts to limit damage). And...I discovered after years on mountainsides or eastern shores that I really do need to perceive my neighbors' nearness. It's comforting to me. I don't want racket, of course, but I don't crave isolation or massive privacy. Indoors, sure. But not when I'm walking; I crave the human landscape as much as the other...and it's a 20 minute drive to the most beautiful mountains I've ever known.

IN town, definitely. And fortunately, M. feels the same way. There's a river right through the city anyone can access from various paths, but living ON water is unlikely. We're not going to spend THAT much! (Though I did point out to him at one house today where he could put in a pool...). His own glimpse of lake is through a very overgrown woods that is currently smothering his house, so not very soothing.

Hugs
Hops

My own personal perspective, Hops, is that it's inordinately sensible for all of us to be aware that getting older, more frail, becoming unwell and so on are all possibilities, however well we look after ourselves.  And in the absence of family to step in and help, it makes absolute sense to look for practical places to live, close to shops, doctors, somewhere nice for an evening out and so on.  As you say, you can always holiday to other places :)  Very exciting to be looking around and wondering where to go next :)  xx xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on August 31, 2019, 04:36:34 PM
Thanks, ((((Tupp))))!

He's on board with finding our own place near downtown, so I'm very grateful for that. I may be heist on me own petard, though, because we've blundered into a barely-advertised one with few details but we've seen it (outside), walked around it, and both just went whomp, in love.

Upsides: 1901 absolutely adorable, not a Mcmansion, literally just blocks from the Mall (restaurants, kulchah, library, concerts, parks, civic life). Historic --M is doing mental cartwheels over that and its original state (which he'd love to renovate) and we both are nuts about a brick stable behind it on the alley, which could become guest/studio/study/all three (it's large) space. Corner lot, endless potential space wise.

Downsides: Biggest one which is BIG, and it tells you something about the charm of the place that we're still so into it. It's on a VERY busy street. Actually the same one I live at the peaceful, quiet, no-traffic end of. But...up the road it's a direct artery out of downtown, a major street from there to the highway (I'm waaaaay past the highway with no through traffic, river below, etc). And the traffic there is relentless, and thus...noisy. Early morning and evenings won't be bad, but most of the day, with bedlam at rush hour, it's real. Daunting. Yet, and yet....

Other one is just that we've left messages for the anonymous owner with no response. It's not being marketed on regular listings and we're heading for the courthouse next week to try to find out the name and some way to write them a letter. So it's an iffy kinda thing. We may talk ourselves out of it (traffic) but the fantasizing has been fun.

The noise thing, we've talked about. I would plant a double row of thick hedge and do triple-glazed front and side windows. Beyond that, the truth is I don't spend a lot of time outdoors unless I'm taking a walk, so with sound insulation I'd be fine.
The yard can be made very pretty and we'd get help for that. I've faced that I'm a lazy, unmotivated gardener at this point, but M can afford the help and I'd love being "supervisor" for that.

Long story shorter, I think it's unlikely but we are enjoying looking together, and there's no urgency.

Other stuff that's happening is that we've stepped forward and have a mutual assumption about marriage and he does keep proposing. I will say Yes, but there are things I'd need resolved before taking the leap:
--we have bought a house
--we have agreed on downsizing process

That's pretty much it. I do dread leaving here but dread life alone forever more, so I've made my decision. M has been SO happy lately since we got intimacy underway (in our geezer fashion) that there's just no more hesitation.

More later...neighbor coming.

xxxxoooo
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on August 31, 2019, 06:29:15 PM
It's nice to read about house hunting, ideas for hedges, and your increasing confidence in the relationship, Hops.

I hope you find a house that sparks joy. 

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on September 01, 2019, 01:42:18 AM
Thanks, ((((Tupp))))!

He's on board with finding our own place near downtown, so I'm very grateful for that. I may be heist on me own petard, though, because we've blundered into a barely-advertised one with few details but we've seen it (outside), walked around it, and both just went whomp, in love.

Upsides: 1901 absolutely adorable, not a Mcmansion, literally just blocks from the Mall (restaurants, kulchah, library, concerts, parks, civic life). Historic --M is doing mental cartwheels over that and its original state (which he'd love to renovate) and we both are nuts about a brick stable behind it on the alley, which could become guest/studio/study/all three (it's large) space. Corner lot, endless potential space wise.

Downsides: Biggest one which is BIG, and it tells you something about the charm of the place that we're still so into it. It's on a VERY busy street. Actually the same one I live at the peaceful, quiet, no-traffic end of. But...up the road it's a direct artery out of downtown, a major street from there to the highway (I'm waaaaay past the highway with no through traffic, river below, etc). And the traffic there is relentless, and thus...noisy. Early morning and evenings won't be bad, but most of the day, with bedlam at rush hour, it's real. Daunting. Yet, and yet....

Other one is just that we've left messages for the anonymous owner with no response. It's not being marketed on regular listings and we're heading for the courthouse next week to try to find out the name and some way to write them a letter. So it's an iffy kinda thing. We may talk ourselves out of it (traffic) but the fantasizing has been fun.

The noise thing, we've talked about. I would plant a double row of thick hedge and do triple-glazed front and side windows. Beyond that, the truth is I don't spend a lot of time outdoors unless I'm taking a walk, so with sound insulation I'd be fine.
The yard can be made very pretty and we'd get help for that. I've faced that I'm a lazy, unmotivated gardener at this point, but M can afford the help and I'd love being "supervisor" for that.

Long story shorter, I think it's unlikely but we are enjoying looking together, and there's no urgency.

Other stuff that's happening is that we've stepped forward and have a mutual assumption about marriage and he does keep proposing. I will say Yes, but there are things I'd need resolved before taking the leap:
--we have bought a house
--we have agreed on downsizing process

That's pretty much it. I do dread leaving here but dread life alone forever more, so I've made my decision. M has been SO happy lately since we got intimacy underway (in our geezer fashion) that there's just no more hesitation.

More later...neighbor coming.

xxxxoooo
Hops

Oh my days, Hopsie, you're getting married!  Aw, I am so genuinely, honestly delighted for you :)  I know you were talking/thinking about it anyway but this sounds much more like, yes, it's on, sort a date!  Aw, so lovely, congratulations to you both :)

Noisy house - all I will say is I have lived in big cities on very busy roads many times in my life - and the traffic quickly becomes background noise and isn't noticeable after a while.  So with the soundproofing and hedges as well I think you'd be okay.  It sounds like a lovely house, and nice that you're both very excited about it.  I will keep fingers crossed that you can find the owner (and that there might be a quirky story behind it as well, I love quirky!).

Aw, Hops, happy posts!  This is so good :) xx xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on September 01, 2019, 11:10:01 AM
OOOOOOO... this sounds like a craftsman style house Hops? Or is it a Victorian or Queen Anne? What a wonderful project to share - updating, remodelling, making a nest together. Remodels can be stressful, but they don't have to be. Working together will be a good thing, for sure.

I hear you about taking your time thinking about marriage; but it is what you wanted. I'm so glad it's working out for you two.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on September 01, 2019, 02:28:36 PM
Thanks, guys...your being happy for me is soooo...happy!

Did more digging and found the owners of record, two older women in M's neighborhood, in fact. It's in a Family Trust, they're the Trustees. So I've written them a letter expressing our interest. The two sisters named in the trust didn't answer the phone or return my call (I suspect it was their younger brother who also lives there whose voice I heard).

We're all excited but who knows.

We're not EXACTLY "engaged" but I did refer to M as my "fiance" in my letter to the sisters, which he saw, so I think we've kinda slid sideways into it. I do want those securities in place before I commit, though.

Amazing time.

We're heading off to a little nearby river town for a picnic so I've gotta boogie.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on September 01, 2019, 09:14:14 PM
Hey Lighter, I mean Amber (whoops!)--
Forgot to answer your question.
It's not Craftsman, it's late vernacular Victorian.
1901. Gables, trim, porches, and the brick stable. I dug into the history and it was built by a local shoemaker named Sextus. I love that. Told M we'd name our next dog after him but it'd be awkward when I'm yelling from the porch: Sexxxyyyy! Time for dinner! Heeeeeere, Sexxyyyy!

It's 2500 sq ft (huge for most human homes, yet a real leap from my 1100). I sure don't need or desire that much space (being a small-footprint afficionado) but M is himself with his antiques and art and rugs...AND he snores, so this could be for us a beautiful compromise. We found out from a walker that it's vacant so went up and gawked in the windows, etc. Looks relatively untouched and not bad condition, either. M expects he'd sink in almost what he'd buy it for to renovate but seems exhilarated by the idea.

I've had a lot of experience with falling in love with houses to have them not work out, though, so I'm keeping a lid on the daydreams. Or trying to.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Meh on September 02, 2019, 12:32:16 AM
Hehehe 😋 well looking at houses sounds fun. I like to see the inside of houses for sale just for the heck of it.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on September 05, 2019, 07:47:09 AM
Me too, G...
I've always been a house buzzard.

Something about imagining alternate lives, I think.

Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on September 05, 2019, 08:24:26 AM
Or living a new one Hops.

When there are major changes - and the struggles to adapt to those changes - and one reaches a plateau - it's a chance to take a breath, look around, and realize you've grown into another fuller version of yourself. More doors of possibilities await now, than ever.

Or more new rooms to make nests in.  :D
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on September 05, 2019, 10:00:33 AM
Ok.... a huge renovation possibly in the works for Hops.  Along with a new marriage.   And moves, and setting up her little cottage for what comes next. 

I'm with you, Hops, about being a bit shy over renovating houses. 

It's not a bad dream for new construction is it? 

Everything new, and working, and under warranty.

Whatever happens, enjoy it: )

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on September 05, 2019, 04:01:33 PM
Thanks, guys.

Light, I've actually always disliked new construction, which unless it's architecturally quirky and imaginative, to me feels soulless. Most fancy new developments, even high end ones, leave my heart cold. I crave character in a home a lot. You've got a major point, though, about what's easier. And it might be that at this point in life it's time to compromise on things I crave in favor of things that are practical. We'll see...no news on that front anyway.

As to marriage? We are not engaged. I don't feel ready to be. But it's good we can touch on the subject with that goal in mind as we go forward.

Just had a really difficult time with M that was noone's fault, but illustrated a difference in our personalities. His charming over-the-topness, hyperfocus, and man-in-charge stuff is at times wonderful, refreshing and even comforting. Until it's not. I'm very sensitive and slowly am realizing that although I know he is GOOD, that doesn't mean he is also sensitive. Sometimes he bulls ahead with a topic or behavior that's quite sensitive for me, and gets all absorbed in his own goal and it is alienating. I was very upset about it yesterday and now am worried whether under the stresses of life and aging, we'll be compatible in all the ways we ideally should be.

Then again, things take time, and his distress at recognizing that he's been hurtful is genuine.

I'll leave it at that for now and will probably be reporting soon that it's all better and the happy feelings are back in full.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on September 06, 2019, 04:55:35 PM
I don't know, Hops.  It seems to me that everyone has 10 good things and 10 bad things.  True relationship requires we love the bad things,  as much as the good things, IME.  We at least make peace with them, and recognize the ways they stretch us as human beings, who require the same grace in return, IME. 

And that's what this will be, Hops.  Bestowing grace on this man when he's doesn't necessarily deserve it, bc that's who you are to him now.  The kind person who explains what's in your heart, so he understands, when things are difficult.  You speak to him the way you want him to speak to you, and you make sure you're heard.   It appears he wants to hear you. 

And he'll be kind right back. 

That said, things aren't always going to be smooth sailing.  Relationships are work.  I think we sometimes have unrealistic expectations about just how much work is required. 

My mother used to say...
"Once you give up your freedom, it's gone."

I think that applies to all kinds of things.  Once we accept not being heard, not being understood... it gets too hard to fight our way back.  Better to pipe up, when the timing's right, and keep things clear. 

I think you're doing a marvelous job of that, btw.  You aren't living in fear.  You're forging ahead in avery brave fashion, iMO.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on September 07, 2019, 08:55:23 AM
Thanks, Lighter. I really appreciate that.

I think what happens when we have a disagreement or "off" phase is that M becomes overwhelmed with anxiety. And then, he begins bits of what seem to me like passive-aggression. I don't want to overreact, because 90% of the time he's not that way at all.

Example: If we've had a misunderstanding or difficult moment to work through, and I've retreated for a bit, he will absolutely flood me with messages about his overwhelming love for me, repeating and repeating and repeating and repeating it....until it doesn't feel like being loved so much as badgered.

I mean, when someone says "I love you" and your honest response in that moment is, "You've told me that..." something is amiss.

I've tried to explain it. Yesterday that came up (the frantic repetitions). I explained to him that sometimes hearing it too often wasn't helping. So as he began to email me early this morning, he began including at the end of his message: "Oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo...." It had that whiff of something I don't like reading in an email.

So I just wrote: What is Oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo?

He said, it's what I want to say but am not allowed to say so I find another way to say it.

I wrote back that to me, it seemed as though if someone says they're feeling uncomfortable and you invent a code that just lets you do what you want anyway, that's not progress. Something like that.

I don't want to make a mountain out of a molehill but I have pretty sensitive radar for when email is going toxic. I tried to explain it, then just asked that we talk later today and stop email for now. I hope he'll be able to understand.

(I got into horrible spaces in an email relationship years ago that made me forever cautious about relying on it for actual connection. I told him that we're okay, but since our connection had been tested recently, I think it's important to be clear and careful when we write each other.)

????? Does that make sense?

Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on September 07, 2019, 11:37:16 AM
It makes sense, Hops.

I'm wondering if a good T,  specializing in codependence, wouldn't be helpful for you and M to see together, and apart.   

It seems like you've hammered out how you feel, what your comfort levels are, and what you want more, and less of. 

M needs help learning how to tolerate his discomfort with your boundaires, which spirals into distress, which spills  into your in box.  It's a process.  he won't master it quickly, but I'm hoping he has support enough to move him through with economy of motion.  For his sake, and particularly yours.

Maybe a shared T, weekly, for while?  And he keeps his T, and you keep yours.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on September 07, 2019, 06:39:21 PM
I think you're right, Lighter...the issue really is codependence.

I might start by asking him to bring it up with his T...but I'll keep in mind the possibility of joint therapy too. It was a big step that he was receptive to his own T and he's still in early stages with that, so I'll give it some time.

Meanwhile, I can read up on it again myself just to strengthen my notions of how to react but not over-react.

M is so good for me, in so many ways, that I ain't throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

Thanks for this helpful perspective. You're spot on.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on September 08, 2019, 02:27:31 AM
Thanks, Lighter. I really appreciate that.

I think what happens when we have a disagreement or "off" phase is that M becomes overwhelmed with anxiety. And then, he begins bits of what seem to me like passive-aggression. I don't want to overreact, because 90% of the time he's not that way at all.

Example: If we've had a misunderstanding or difficult moment to work through, and I've retreated for a bit, he will absolutely flood me with messages about his overwhelming love for me, repeating and repeating and repeating and repeating it....until it doesn't feel like being loved so much as badgered.

I mean, when someone says "I love you" and your honest response in that moment is, "You've told me that..." something is amiss.

I've tried to explain it. Yesterday that came up (the frantic repetitions). I explained to him that sometimes hearing it too often wasn't helping. So as he began to email me early this morning, he began including at the end of his message: "Oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo...." It had that whiff of something I don't like reading in an email.

So I just wrote: What is Oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo?

He said, it's what I want to say but am not allowed to say so I find another way to say it.

I wrote back that to me, it seemed as though if someone says they're feeling uncomfortable and you invent a code that just lets you do what you want anyway, that's not progress. Something like that.

I don't want to make a mountain out of a molehill but I have pretty sensitive radar for when email is going toxic. I tried to explain it, then just asked that we talk later today and stop email for now. I hope he'll be able to understand.

(I got into horrible spaces in an email relationship years ago that made me forever cautious about relying on it for actual connection. I told him that we're okay, but since our connection had been tested recently, I think it's important to be clear and careful when we write each other.)

????? Does that make sense?

Hops

Makes sense to me, Hops, and it would drive me nuts as well (if that's any consolation!).  Do you think he doesn't hear what you're saying (and by that I mean, does he miss the meaning of 'I need some time to myself' and not take it to mean you mean complete radio silence) or does he know what you mean but just chooses to ignore it?  I'm just wondering if being very direct with him might help ("I need some time on my own.  I'm staying home till Wednesday, please don't contact me before then")  Or that might be what you're already doing and it's making no difference.  I'm just thinking that some people don't get nuance or subtlety (or layers - some people genuinely can't understand why saying "I love you" could be annoying) and need a much more clear, direct instruction.  You know him best, obviously, they're just thoughts popping into my head as I read your post (and I'm sure you've thought of all of them already).  You could just buy a very good book on co-dependence and whack him with it when he's being annoying :) Lol xx xx xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on September 08, 2019, 02:15:26 PM
The reason I thought joint T might be an option was..... you seem to be having trouble getting M to understand.

Then I remembered.... Hops can relate concepts better than anyone I know.  That's not the issue.

The issue is deeply help within M's childhood, and internal world.  Having a professional, who deals with codependence,  might get M where he's going more quickly. 

My own codependence can hardly stand M's fear, and panic.... I see that now.   

It's support, for both you and M, on this journey, and I so want both of you to find your comfortable groove. 

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on September 17, 2019, 11:16:30 AM
Quote
Do you think he doesn't hear what you're saying (and by that I mean, does he miss the meaning of 'I need some time to myself' and not take it to mean you mean complete radio silence)
This is possible
or does he know what you mean but just chooses to ignore it? 
This is what I fear
I'm just wondering if being very direct with him might help ("I need some time on my own.  I'm staying home till Wednesday, please don't contact me before then")
This is exactly what I need to do next time
Some people genuinely can't understand why saying "I love you" could be annoying) and need a much more clear, direct instruction.
Thanks, Tupp. As ever, you have zoomed right into the actuality of it.

I think he batters me with verbal romantic pyrotechnics partly because the way his mind/lifelong studies/language intensives work, they are "real language" to him. (Like having flowery speeches and dramatic medieval poetry pumping in your brain all day long). And, partly--I don't really know whether this is true, to be fair-- perhaps he thinks it gives him "cover" when he's actually not connecting with me, but substituting word-fog. Or, because he doesn't empathize with what it might feel like to be on the receiving end of word-fog. (Empathy has become a concern.)

Recently I said to him when he was holding forth: I have trouble sometimes not feeling as though I'm listening to an authority figure who's dictating knowledge to me, and it makes me feel resistant. (I'm glad I did it that way, starting with my own non-angry feelings.) He said: I don't think I know any other way to talk to people; I've been doing this for over 50 years.

What's happening now is that we had another crisis. I've identified something helpful to me. We are SO compatible so much of the time that the times I've felt very upset with him have felt like big shocks and I've responded with massive anxiety and upset. But I recently identified for myself that there's a pattern--his over-the-top, bull-in-a-china-shop personality doesn't cause me distress EXCEPT when he's stomping over personal boundaries. The time's he's upset me most were:
--he walked into my relationship (lack of) with my D and began toying with "plans" to reach out to her without asking, consulting, requesting permission from me first.
--he presses into my personal time and space when I've retreated to rebalance myself (as above, though Tupp helped me realize how I need to fix it)
--when I was in the ER and had specifically stated I did not want him to come back to the cubicle until I was ready to see him, he manipulated his way and bulled in anyway (ignored my expressed personal wishes as a patient). Later, his support meant everything. But his ignoring my wishes at that time was very upsetting.
--A minor one, but it pushed my T's buttons as well (as "paternalistic' which, if one unpacks it, does involve a lot of personal-boundary-ignoring). He makes statements to my friends like "I want to thank you for all your care of Hops." It sounds completely benign and his conscious intention is...but I'm not his child. It's the "thank you" that felt uncomfortable. If he'd said, "I felt glad that Hops had so much support from a friend like you at that time" or something similar about how HE felt, it wouldn't have landed weird. But the way he put it, it came across as "Thank you for taking care of my woman..." which just doesn't sit right. It's not the best example of his paternalism (his encroachments with my D are strong ones).

This last one is the same theme--personal boundaries. But it's difficult. I don't want to discuss details, methods or plans. Y'all know he has a physical vulnerability that makes him very anxious and affects intimacy. I'm just rusty. NEITHER of our physical vulnerabilities concerns me. But something else does, so much that it's hit me quite hard lately that if it doesn't get better, it is a deal breaker.

He doesn't listen to me. He is either SO anxious to "get 'er done" (which I have compassion for) or, so indifferent to what my wishes are, that my statements including No, Don't, Not There, Not Like That...have to be repeated three times before he stops what he's doing. Last time this occurred I was so upset I got up and went home, and burst into tears the minute I walked in the door.

We've tried talking it through since, and I've talked about it in detail with my T, and this question has formed. When I say--BOUNDARY (and have to repeat it endlessly before he changes behavior)...is he modifying anything because he realizes inside himself "I don't want to do/say/touch that way because now I understand Hops doesn't like it" OR because "I will obey this stupid rule/request just because I'm desperate not to lose her, not because I respect or empathize with how she feels."

I'm not sure what the answer is, and I'm feeling sad and dark about the possibility it's the latter.

I'll keep trying. It is work, we both have baggage, etc. But the night I got up and left he had actually shushed me when I was trying to tell him how it felt, what I needed. "Shhhhhh! Shhhhh!" That set me off and my ignored discomfort (emotional as well as physical) sent me out the door.

Sigh. I still love him and want this relationship to work, but for me, this was a big moment. We've tried to talk it through since and I still feel he's not hearing me.

Another thing that came up with the T is his lack of asking me questions about myself and listening to the answers. He does talk about himself nonstop. I can get him to listen when it's very important or urgent, but it's an exhausting routine of "i need you to listen to this, please stop interrupting, please let me finish, I need to say this without being interrupted, please don't start touching me while I'm trying to get this out as it distracts me and I lose my thought..." etc etc. It's exhausting and I'm concerned that if he doesn't learn to (or care to) listen I will internally disengage.

Been feeling a bit of that lately within myself, and it's making me sad. I'll face it if this is a hole in the boat that can't be patched, but I sure am hoping it's repairable. This relationship has brought me back to life and given me excitement about the future. I am hoping it won't come to letting go, but I will survive if it does.

Thanks for listening,
Hops

PS I think a lot of his boundary-bashing is clueless entitlement (raised as a golden boy in a Latin culture) and a lot of it is anxiety. A ton. He's acknowledged how deeply anxious he is. And at heart, he is decent and kind and sentimental. It's just that in these moments, I don't care what the cause is...his behavior is impacting me and he seems oblivious (or my fear is, uninterested?) in its impact on me. That's where I'm beginning to fear that underneath all the massive volume of flowery words, there's no heart connection or real empathy. Dunno if that can be learned....
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on September 17, 2019, 03:36:11 PM
Awwwww Hops. Hugs dear.

I can imagine this feels scary. But maybe you can get a little stubborn and assertive, and say: this is what I require to feel comfortable. And release the outcome? You need to be able to explain and be understood - not just heard - about your worries with the word fog and real, felt connection and empathy. Yes, that means you might scare him too. Those are the risks involved with being open and vulnerable, which is what is needed for true intimacy.

I'm fumbling around with similar stuff too. And I have the same "word" problem as M does. LOL. Scared Buck into thinking I was mad at him last night. And I wasn't. Just trying to spit out coherently things swirling in my head and (terribly) aware that I'm also going through a big "anniversary" re: Mike at the same time this new stuff is going on. I wasn't very coherent or clear, until this morning. Seems that's the best time for me, in the day, to talk about important stuff. I think we sorted that out, but I cost Buck a good night's sleep. :(

This is turning into a beautiful fall out my way. Maybe you guys could benefit from a weekend change of scenery?
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on September 17, 2019, 05:41:26 PM
Thanks, Amber.
You're right, this will require speaking clearly and confidently about what I require to feel I can keep on progressing. Being listened to honestly, with evidence afterward that I've been heard. It is scary but unavoidable, for an honest and healthy connection to grow. We're mostly-healthy in most major areas, but not the relaxed, close emotional connection part. The anxiety is just too huge. His triggers mine or mine triggers his, or we're in a mutual firing squad at times. Not wanting to be, just the ways we're wired.

I can so imagine how the Mike anniversary is affecting you. I'm glad you honor and acknowledge and are tender about it.

The one-year anniversary of M's wife's death is tomorrow, and I'm glad we'll be together then. I wonder if some of his recent "spinning" has been influenced by that. He doesn't bring it up often but of course it's working in his unconscious. It's definitely not the only reason for his insensitivity, but makes sense that it's one factor that might be helpful for him to talk about if he'd like to.

He mostly likes to go on and on about how everything is wonderful, perfect, fabulous, astonishing, he can't imagine life without me, he wants me forever, let's hurry up and find a house and marry and it's all (for him)....URGENT.

I see urgent as code for anxious, so my heels are digging in to put on the brakes.

Appreciate your response and understanding mucho mucho!

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on September 17, 2019, 05:53:02 PM
OK, Hops....
I think M isn't in his adult right mind when he spins like that.  I think the little baby grasping for mama is in charge, and baby can't wait or feel OK until mama is back within his grasp or view,  kwim?

To figure that out,  I can't imagine doing it without a professional who can talk him through it when you've lost your patience, when he's in an appointment hearing HOW important this is and WHY he needs to do A B C and D... even if he's feeling anxious, so he can move OUT of that place, and into a better place.

This isn't just about you feeling better.  HE'LL feel so much better once he's done some work, and figured out new strategies, and pathways, IME. That's always the way.  Through the abyss, and all that.

There's my two cents.   There's no direct reasoning with baby, and you're definitely one to use reason, and seek understanding.

Baby needs to feel heard, understood and cared for before baby can consider listening and giving attention to ANYTHING besides his own selfish nurturing little baby needs, IME. 

I think it makes sense you were attracted to him, and him to you.  Now, how to make the most and best of that attraction, while limiting the hard sharp pointy spots. 

Love isn't enough.  There needs to be comfort, rest, and ease, along with action, affection, and cooperation.  Figuring all that out, without triggering abandonement issues, will be quite the trick.  If any one can do it, you certainly can.

Use your mommy voice to get him into a good codependene T who can work with you both.  He's a motivated man.  Steer him in a postiive direction, and hold your ground.

OK.  NOW that's my two cents over: )

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on September 17, 2019, 05:59:38 PM
Aw Hops.  The thing that really impresses me about you is the way that you look at things so truthfully and honestly, even when you know doing so might break your heart.  I think just about everyone else I've ever known would be glossing over the things you've mentioned because the allure of marriage/comfortable retirement/companionship in later years is so strong (and understandably so) that a lot of people would just put up with the things you've mentioned.  I'm glad you feel able to acknowledge them to yourself and give yourself time to think and talk about them.

I think what's difficult to work out (with anyone) is whether the way they're behaving is being caused by something (and is therefore something that can be worked on) or if it's more just an aspect of their personality (which I think is much harder to shift).  I imagine he's often had to hold court, either at work or socially, and I think we can all find ourselves slipping into a certain kind of mask (flowery language and romantic ramblings).  I suppose the question is whether he can take the mask off and be a bit more 'real' with you.

The not being heard and his need to take over (including the not really paying attention during intimacy bit) might be the part of 'man' that he's always been expected to play - in charge, taking control, running the show.  I think for a long time society dictated that men did the doing and women followed along - in all areas of life.  Meeting a woman like you is probably/possibly quite a new thing for him - someone who thinks deeply, expresses herself clearly and goes home when she's not happy is quite possibly all new territory for him.

None of which helps - we can rationalise and intellectualise and analyse but ultimately we want our Hopsie to be happy, and heard, and respected.  The not listening during sex thing would have really triggered me and, like you, I would be wondering if he was just placating me until the next time.  The other situations you mentioned are all things that would have really bothered me.  Someone taking charge during a time of crisis when you're unable to cope is one thing, but taking charge when there's no need to would bother me.  As would saying thank you to people for looking after you :)  I can fully see that there would be women who would find that really sweet and who love the idea of having a man in charge and looking after them whilst being sweet to their friends.  And then there are women like Hops (and the rest of us) who don't like it, don't want it and don't need it.

It's very hard.  It's tough to figure out other people's motives and reasons, especially when they probably don't actually have that insight themselves.  I am hoping that it's resolveable/fixable/manageable.  But also glad that you're taking an eyes wide open approach.  I expect his wife's anniversary is having some sort of whoo haa with him at the moment, which again doesn't help but maybe it means things will calm down a bit.  Is he still visiting his own T? xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: CB123 on September 18, 2019, 12:15:19 AM
I had missed the Latin element somehow, Hops. Is he from Spain? Is English his second language? There can definitely be some communication issues, if so--especially if he is a really good English speaker, its easy to forget. Also there are deeply embedded cultural issues, especially male-female ones.

CB
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on September 18, 2019, 04:11:29 PM
Hi ((((CB))))--

First, Everybody--thank you so very much for these posts. I am feeling the need to sit with them a bit, and reflect more deeply after seeing M again this evening. I'm going to be listening, and speaking very honestly. And I feel as though I'll know more after that, to post more clearly in response, tomorrow.

CB, your question is easier! M looks totally Irish but he was born and raised in Costa Rica. His father is the Latin side, his mother the Irish-Italian side (I keep mixing them up, will advise). His family history is a huge mix of Spain, Italy, Cuba, Ireland, etc. He's a beautiful mutt.

But definitely influenced by Latin perceptions of manhood, so that was a good thing to mention. Intellectually, he's offset not all but a lot of that. His mind is pretty amazing, and I find him more open to new information than any other man my age I've met. I think he may have a genius IQ. Dunno if I mentioned it, but he was the youngest full professor in the US at one point. (I keep referring to his relentless ambition as though that was the reason but, in fact, he is also so brilliant that he deserved that status.) He's politically as liberal as I am, was a total rebel in his youth (in Berkeley!), so I'm not dealing with conventional macho. I think the paternalism and stuff comes partly from the Latin influence, yet more from the fact that his family, going way back, was very wealthy and influential. I think it's class that has given him some blind spots. He does try to see other perspectives but was in a gilded bubble of money and elitism his whole life. He doesn't know as much as I do about questions of power and privilege, because he never had to deal with them.

I can see him fighting it off, but the slipping comes when he walks into a tense situation or something that seems to need solving, and his sense of mastery ("master"fulness) rises. I don't even blame him for that. He has a portrait of his grandmother that's literally 3 feet high in his LR. The sense of legacy, the pressure of it (and unwittingly, the companion entitlement) goes waaaaaaaaay back.

I have to say I admire him for his reactions when he bumps into it and I can see it dawning in a given moment. I actually think if we can keep on, there might be a revelatory journey for him ahead. He keeps telling me how "astonishing" it all is with me, and I've reacted mostly to his exaggerated language, without realizing that he sincerely means this. He IS astonished! I'm off in the weeds examining psychological stuff, not astonished at all about seeing emotional things for what they are, and he's trying to deal with an upended world view.

I feel calmer about setting more boundaries, holding them in peace, and just letting him play out whatever reaction he wants to. Partly because I talked about it so much with my T, and partly because of so much understanding (and insights) I've received here....I do feel like investing some more patience and effort.

No conclusions yet, but I also want to be conscious of not throwing out the baby with the bathwater.

Will let y'all know tomorrow how it's going, and thank you, from the bottom of my heart, for being here.

Love,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on September 18, 2019, 09:52:35 PM
I'm glad you're not feeling urgency around this, Hops.  Just put it out there, do what you can, and see what happens.  No sense filling yourself with what ifs and worst case scenarios. 

In fact, I think holding more curiosity, and fewer expectations is a positive resting position.  Just bc he's spinning, when he spins, doesn't mean you have to.  It also doesn't mean he'll spin like that forever. 

::nod::.

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on September 19, 2019, 09:04:49 AM
Appalachian mountain men kinda have that same male-ego blindness, Hops. It helps a little if you can accept that as part of the charm, while still setting your boundaries and maintaining them. It's not a terrible thing (for me anyway) to have an opportunity to explore more of that traditional feminine side and see how it feels at this stage of my life... because Buck has the other stuff all figured out. It's not that he won't let me participate (I remind him a lot) - just that it's easy for him to decide, design & construct.

But what I wanted to point out to you is that the first anniversary IS difficult; and IMO, it needs to be acknowledged, honored, time taken out to appreciate what was and is no longer. It's not sufficient to completely bury those feelings in activity, words, or social interactions. IF it were a genuine relationship at any rate - some aren't and the "loss" is actually more of a "good riddance". Some people do very well for long chunks of their life in a superficial relationship. I'm not one of them. If nothing else, that one-year mark becomes a milestone to a chapter in M's personal history and still needs those moments of appreciation. It does start to get easier after that... and a lot of the emotional energy can get released to potentiality at that point.

I think time operates differently in the emotional world, if you want to entertain sci-fi explanations. But then, I have no way to validate that theory - it's just my personal experience.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on September 19, 2019, 09:51:59 PM
Thanks MUCH, everyone.
We had a relaxed evening after a goofy session alone in the pool wherein I gave him a standup (swimup) routine explaining a reality TV show, a really stupid one about romance, that I freely confess I enjoy. I was spoofing all the characters ("contesticles" as the men are called by one witty blogger), and miming stuff, and M got hysterical. Nothing makes me much happier than making someone laugh, so I'm tickled he finds me funny. It was a great way to relax before going back to his house for dinner.

I remember thinking, I'm just going to relax and be myself this evening, and I did enjoy it. He was calmer too. And served me another awesome meal, and we drank wine on the deck at sunset. He'd had a tough week at the U. and it was nice to chill out together.

Lighter, your scathing but truthful depiction of his infantile side really sobered me. It was reality and a kind of stem-level depiction of dependency. Not my favorite moments with him but I'm still drawing those boundaries. Pretty comfortably. I enjoyed a friend's company downtown this evening, and then my own later, just watching the golden light and happy people enjoying the amazing weather, and pooch. I sat over my dinner at a favorite cafe and just savored it all. M had mentioned what he was having for dinner and I'd had no expectation of us being together tonight, and later he still had a way of upping the ante, conveying anxiety--a later call to double check about the next two evenings, etc etc. The man does CLUTCH. He constantly makes the next plan and the next plan and the next, and I react by refusing to firm up all the details for casual get-togethers until the day of, because I feel hemmed in by having absolutely every encounter on the calendar. Formal things or things that include others, sure, we can book those. But on a day to day basis I want the freedom to retreat and he'll have to get used to it. I'm trying to work on just maintaining my own security/maturity and will find out over time if his improves. I liked what you said about spinning. Good term for it.

Amber, he's not acknowledging the anniversary much--I brought it up very tenderly. Or, he started deflecting it (reminding me he "had her blessing" to find someone) and I said it's not about me, I was referencing that you lost her a year ago. Then he said, there's not a day that goes by that I don't think of her. I feel glad when he mentions her and sometimes I hoist a toast to her in the clouds.

And I hear you about his more traditional masculinity. I'm a bit different though in that traditional feminine roles or rituals do tend to make me extremely uncomfortable. I'm feminine looking but inside, preoccupied with power systems, always have been. I'm happy you are comfortable with the yin and yang of you and Buck, because every couple is unique in that balance.

CB, I think he can be acting in a cultural way that feels natural to him AND also have anxiety neurosis! His own work in therapy, and time, are all that can be done about the anxiety. But the cultural stuff...he seems always open to talking about that fairly rationally (apart from a few knee-jerk things he struggles to change). His  brilliant intellect really does mean that he's not stuck in concrete, because when I challenge his worldview he genuinely loves that. He calls it "transgressive" "so smart" etc etc...so I think that's where a lot of our growth together takes place. We talk a lot about the world, and cultures, and ideas, and patterns in humanity, etc.
That's the biggest compatibility we have, being able to connect in the area of ideas.

Domestically, M is an insecure drama queen who is dying to formalize and finalize our life together, at which point I think he'll feel more secure. But I'm not jumping at it until I know he's into the growth and the work and won't go inert once wifey's in place. All these critical comments aside, the man really does love me, and after 25 years without, I'm grateful.

He was creating drama today of me going back to the medical center to get another cardiac monitor (same test needs repeating as results were ambiguous for afib). He kept saying, please call me and let me know how "the procedure" went. Are you okay? Etc. And I was just going to get a big electrodes patch thingy stuck on my chest. No procedure, no crisis, just a prosaic clinic visit to get that, nothing else. Exact same monitoring I did before. So I was NOT feeling anxious or in crisis mode or fragile, but he was going there. Felt a little irritated but just didn't buy in.

I told him earlier this week I'll be having a gum graft procedure coming up. He calls me back, intent on telling me I'll "have to have a driver that day because of anesthesia" and he had no idea. Just leaps to the most dramatic scenario in which he will be my essential white knight and rescuer. I think that's how he sees love.

Anyway, all this is just ins and outs of learning how to be with this man. I feel calm tonight, kind of in "don't sweat the small stuff" mode, and I think that's good.

He also gave me excellent eye contact, looking really vulnerable, and I said gently, "How 'bout that" and I sensed some new light had gone on. He's still worth it.

hugs and thanks again,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on September 20, 2019, 10:32:16 AM
Hops I think you're doing great sorting all this out comfortably.

As for anniversaries, yeah... I have had an understanding with Mike too for years before he passed. But that doesn't mean even 4 years later, I don't have those sneaky guilt feelings creeping in sometimes or even some other types of - for me, surprising - strange reactions going on. The other widows I communicate with have mentioned the same things. Usually, acknowledging and having a bit of a "talking to" with oneself is all that's needed to straighten things out again.

Now I'm gonna go further nurse this weird sinus attack or head cold or whatever it is, that has me pretty much out of commission. Y'all just carry on.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on September 20, 2019, 01:07:17 PM
Yes I agree with Skep, it's great that you're keeping yourself steady when M wobbles and giving everything time, space, honest discussion, a bit of back and forth, it's great that things aren't making you run for the hills (as things seem to settle down a bit each time).  I'm glad you're back in a good place with things, Hops, and Skep, I hope you feel better soon! xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on September 20, 2019, 02:12:39 PM

I remember thinking, I'm just going to relax and be myself this evening, and I did enjoy it. He was calmer too. And served me another awesome meal, and we drank wine on the deck at sunset. He'd had a tough week at the U. and it was nice to chill out together.I'm so glad to read that, Hops: )

Lighter, your scathing but truthful depiction of his infantile side really sobered me. I'[m working on finding a balance with my tone, and words.  I was never listened to, in my family, so things sometimes come out with more "truth" than absolutely necessary. It was reality and a kind of stem-level depiction of dependency. I honestly feel that everyone has some stem-level behaviors.... shadow side....when our brains switch into survival mode.... it's a very helpless place to be, IME.  Not my favorite moments with him but I'm still drawing those boundaries. You have to do it to stay level, Hops.  You staying level is the first step to his finding his way, and learning how to get control of his emotions.... I think. Pretty comfortably. I enjoyed a friend's company downtown this evening, and then my own later, just watching the golden light and happy people enjoying the amazing weather, and pooch. I sat over my dinner at a favorite cafe and just savored it all. I had a lovely day downtown with youngest dd yesterday afternoon... a lot like that.  I smiled, and felt really really happy... and noticed it!  I'm glad you did too: )M had mentioned what he was having for dinner and I'd had no expectation of us being together tonight, and later he still had a way of upping the ante, conveying anxiety--a later call to double check about the next two evenings, etc etc. The man does CLUTCH. Somehow he's going to have to notice what he's doing, then learn to apply some countermeasures to calm himself.  You can't do it for him.  He constantly makes the next plan and the next plan and the next, and I react by refusing to firm up all the details for casual get-togethers until the day of, because I feel hemmed in by having absolutely encounter on the calendar. My mom was that way, not to that level, but it clashed with my desire to have some flexibility with my schedule months down the road, so I know what you mean.  I'm noticing my desire to advocate on his behalf... not sure what that's about, but I don't think giving in to his neediness is how to calm him down.  I think that would lead to escalating behaviors, truthfully.  Formal things or things that include others, sure, we can book those. But on a day to day basis I want the freedom to retreat and he'll have to get used to it. I'm trying to work on just maintaining my own security/maturity and will find out over time if his improves. I liked what you said about spinning. Good term for it. It makes my heart sad for M, bc he's suffering in those times, IMO.  And it's destructive in the relationship.  You might have to figure out how to live with it, or continue pressing him to look at it with a good T, IMO.  It's a lifelong learners club, unfortunately.  He's open to learning, or he's not is how I see it... at this moment anyway.   Sounds like you have more space around your discomfort with this side of him.   That certainly bodes well for the relationship: )

I do echo your caution over marrying him, without SEEING a definitive path to true change, then ending up the wifey with him dropping the T, and settling right back into old patterns with zero motivation to change.  You have to gently guide him on that journey, NOW, IMO.  He certainly seems motivated to please you.  I just hope he doesn't end up resenting you for it down the road.
 That's one reason I want the T to take the lead, and say the harder things so you don't have to.
 You shouldn't have to, Hops.



hugs and thanks again,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on September 20, 2019, 04:15:10 PM
Thanks, guys, so much.

Lighter, thanks for the encouragement. I agree with your insights. Only caveat is, I have no sense that I control what M discusses or takes up with his T. I agree with you what would be good for him to do there, but it's his independent, private therapy, so I keep a respectful difference. (If anybody tried telling me what I "should" discuss with my T that would be a boundary bash.) He'll share what he wants to but I don't expect access. That said, I'm aware that a few things he's said voluntarily about his T make me feel very good about his T! I just think his T is not a service provider to ME, just to M. They'll find their way. I can "gently guide" but truly do not want to set myself up as his teacher, leader or instructor. I think that's toxic to a relationship of equals, as tempting as it is for someone soaked in therapy for years.

What I could indicate some day if needed is, M--I need to know that you are committed to staying in therapy. I think I'd be comfortable saying that, but not setting M's specific goals for him. He has to set his own. I do see him as open to learning and change, but agree with your caution about marriage before I'm sure he's doing this for himself too, not just to keep me. I actually think he sees the benefits, but time will tell.

I'll certainly keep on mentioning anxiety, and my own observations on what I think it looks like in his behavior with me.

Thanks, Tupp -- I'm glad I'm not running, too. It's a relief as things resettle, and each time I freak out, it seems to take less time for us to restore love and equilibrium. If those prevail over time (it's only been 8 months together, and despite M's sense of urgency--we could dieeeee, any minute!--I own my own clock and evaluate my own risk tolerance). For a lifetime decision like that, I'll take whatever time I need and he'll adapt to that, or not. (I think he will.) I don't want to take tooooo long, but more confidence will play out.

He knows that I'm not moving in together or marrying before the house decision is clear. He's putting up both his properties in Costa Rica for sale, not just the condo. I've noticed that news and it's connected to his commitment to getting us a house here without delay when the right one appears. (So far, nothing on the cool old one. We're going to go find out who was the lawyer on the sisters' trust so we can send a polite inquiry there, wondering if it's genuinely available or if s/he can get a message to them since we've had no response. There may be family ambivalence.)

Amber, you're so right that anniversary reactions are real. And I think M is rushing that into the "done" box too fast, just as he tends to rush everything. Doesn't matter. And her "blessing" was nice in that it freed him to date, but really doesn't have much to do with how grief behaves. He'll just have to experience that and figure it out for himself, I think. Not my job to guide/direct that either.

BIG grateful hugs to everyone! I mean, watch out I don't crack your ribs!!

love
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on September 20, 2019, 09:00:50 PM
::smacking forehead::.

Sorry.  I forgot you aren't thinking about a shared T.  I lost my mind, and forgot.

Lighter





.


Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on September 20, 2019, 10:35:49 PM
No worries, Lighter!

And...ugh.

This evening began with him asking me repeatedly if I wanted to learn how to cook his special black beans tomorrow. I said no thanks. He brought it up again and again and again and I finally yelled at him. First time ever. I just blew...M, what is wrong with you! I said no I don't want to!

All downhill from there. Dinner was nice-ish but the tension kept burbling up again. Best word I can think of is perseverate. He does that. Maybe it's a brain or ADHD thing. I have no idea but it bugs the hell out of me.

I tried to explain how I was trying NOT to feel anxiety over getting the monitor put back on, and that his repeated messages about "call me after The Procedure" and "be sure to let me know how it goes with the monitor appointment" and "I'm calling you about that this evening even though you've said you'll have nothing to report." He said it was all about his empathy, knowing I'd been scared about the stroke. I DID tell him that in general, having had a stroke had added concerns to my life. But I had also specifically declined ABOUT THREE TIMES to "report on the appointment" in which I wasn't seeing a doctor, just having the lab tech stick a new (same model) patch/recording pendant on my chest. It didn't merit his Oh this is a crisis! drama and that drama increased my stress and made his urgency to involve himself (boundary issue) MY problem. I just felt he was offloading his anxiety onto me, and it actually increased my stress over the appointment, when I'd been quite calm about it beforehand.

Maybe he just wasn't understanding what I meant. The gulf is that when he repeats and repeats and repeats I feel badgered. And he acts very frantic just saying hello or going to the car with the dog or whatever, it's always a clown-car thing, and it's not fun.

Afterward, he said as he brought me home, and it felt like a test or challenge..."Do I have your permission to escort you to your door?" I said no thanks, I don't feel like being escorted. (My door is 20 feet from the car.) And he said, That means I'm making an offer and you are refusing it. I said, No, I just answered simply, No thanks I don't feel like being escorted. And he persisted...it means you are refusing my gesture. And I said, I'm just saying the truth. And it was STUPID. But I refused not to say my truthful answer to his question. He offered, I politely declined. I guess he wants me to go through symbolic gestures of agreement even when I don't agree? Not able to do that. (Is it SUBMISSION he wants from me? Fat chance.)

Then he said, which he's said before, This means you are resistant. What the f*** does THAT mean? He seems to want to interpret and define what I think and feel in negative ways right now, and I'm not interested in hanging about to listen to it. And to cap it off, as we sat in the car as I dug for my keys, he brought it up AGAIN: "Oh, I'll be preparing the beans tomorrow if you'd like to come over and learn how to do it...."

I couldn't believe it. I just said, why would you do that? Why bring up the same issue we squabbled about at the beginning of this evening? Why repeat it again? He just stared ahead. I asked, it is a way of expressing some kind of anger, indirectly? He said no, frustration.

Whatever. It triggered my upset all over again. Felt really fed up. So I said I don't want to connect tomorrow, I need a day of radio silence [thanks, Tupp--perfect term]without voicemails or calls or emails. And I'll look forward to our plan to get together on Sunday. (We're going to his departmental picnic.)

So that's where we are right now. He literally cannot take in the information I give him when I'm saying No or ask him to stop repeating and repeating and repeating something I've already said No to. I am going to have to be MUCH more direct, and it's not fun. It clearly turns into some kind of stupid struggle over what love is and what the "rules" are...and he gets snide and judgey and analyses me negatively and I'm not having fun. Or I didn't tonight (for really the first time).

I guess I'm analysing him negatively too. I'll watch for that. I'm not sure he does know what empathy is (or he's so defensive he can't hear me). The man cannot take a hint, so I'll have to be more blunt. And then he'll get all hurt and passive-aggressive, is my guess. We'll see.

Sigh. Hope this is just "first fight" syndrome and not a sign of deterioration to come. It felt awful. I'm sick about it. I'm seeing a side of him that really concerns me and he absolutely can't or won't listen calmly and try to understand. He throws up defensive shields of word-snow that are nearly impenetrable.

At one point, he started saying You always... and I said, always and never accusations always put the listener on the defensive. He said no no, these are just neutral "filler" words, just conversational. And if you studied linguistics, you'd understand this... And I said, they're not neutral at all, etc. And I'm NOT studying linguistics.

God. I hate arguing. I dunno. I think it is time for couples therapy, maybe. Because if he really can't understand me or deal with his knee-jerk emotional-circuit-blowing I think we're in trouble.

I think I need to go back to work and end the pleasant honeymoon fantasies about life being all sorted out now. This does NOT feel "sorted out." Maybe it's a normal dating-crisis that couples experience as major commitments loom (I think Judith Sills referred to that pattern in A Fine Romance, CB...). I'll have to re-read it.

Thanks for listening to me vent, friends. Sorry about the hissy fit. Maybe I just can't handle a relationship after so long on my own.

love
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on September 21, 2019, 02:44:00 AM
Hopsie, I think you most definitely can handle a relationship after all your years alone :)  But maybe it's too soon for M?  Just at the first anniversary so his wife had only passed a very short time before you met.  Huge amount of grief and processing for him to get through - the joy of a new relationship distracts from that.  But also brings additional stresses whilst getting to know someone, plus stressful incidents like your health situation, selling houses and so on, as well as that big trip you had together.  He's had a huge amount happen in a very short space of time (not least going into therapy, which can bring up all sorts of resistance and old issues as well).  All of the things you describe about him (that annoy you) all sound anxiety and stress based to me.  Maybe he's trying to do too much too soon and needs some time alone to centre himself as a single man, a widow, a retiree before he gets in to another serious relationship?  Could be he needs to do a lot more of what you're doing  - alone time, thinking time, breathing space?  I don't know how you'd work that practically?  But I think it is more about what he needs to do, rather than what you need to do, if that makes sense? (I'm not suggesting you end it, by the way.  But perhaps the brakes need to be put on to give the whirlwind time to settle?) xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on September 21, 2019, 08:21:01 AM
Oh Hops.... I swear it might be the phase of the moon or something. I understand your reactions (I think) and I know I'd find them annoying (and a little confusing) too. Just breathe. Take your day off and do Hops' things.

Only one thing in your narrative jumped out at me. Words and linguistics and the specific word "resistant". I'll be blunt; resistant sounded like a softer version of rejection. As if he was feeling you were rejecting his attempts at connection with you - through cooking and his old world manners - with your boundary, in fact and therefore he was pressing that issue with the expected anxiety. I might just be reading into that too much... but I thought I heard that.

And that gives me blips on the radar. Nothing huge and threatening... just something to watch out for. Sometimes I wonder if it's possible to adopt the language and analysis of therapy so much, and looking at relationships through that lens, that one can forget that the rest of the world doesn't.

I think is just a tiff Hops. Part of the transition/changes you're both making in becoming an "us". But I hear just a few worrisome things that mean the substance - M not liking or respecting your boundary and taking it the wrong way - could be a recurring situation. Let the dust settle, stay quiet a day, and then explore how it looks in hindsight.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on September 21, 2019, 03:26:56 PM
CB, I'm your sister in gum surgery....so sorry you've got that coming up! But I'm glad you have found a practitioner to trust. So much NOT fun, but I'll be thinking of you. Hope whatever needs fixing is wonderfully fixed. (I'll have two...one to snip the frenulum and a later likely graft. Ugh.)

And thank you for bringing up power imbalance. And money. I think it's important for me to start getting a few new customers for my companion gig. I had let it slide after the gentleman died, and then the lady broke her hip, and then my third one began needing PT style help I don't/can't do. And then M arrived in my life, paying for every meal, and the focus shifted to just letting myself enjoy it because of his constant assurances that it was irrelevant, he delights in paying for everything, etc.

The concern would be -- how would that imbalance get expressed during marriage if we're not getting along? I can survive on social security, but there's zero slack. I used some of my savings for the part of our trip that I took on my own, to Oslo. Glad I did, but the level has dropped below a good emergency-savings threshold. So, I can sell my redundant old car (which I've kept more for emotional than practical reasons) and/or, go back to work now. Or both.

I think doing this would help me look at M and me with more calm, as it will reinforce that I can continue to cope with life independently. For as long as I can anyway. Don't WANT to be on my own, but as you say, it makes all the difference to know that one can. Didn't want to work at 70 but millions of people have to.

I have a worry that M would take this personally and it might contribute to us becoming more alienated, though, so I'll have to think about it. Seems to me I would have to lie to him and say it was because I miss the oldsters, that's why. And that would not be true. In occasional moments I've missed them, because I do love the very old, but I did not miss the scheduling and expectations, etc. I still visit a few of the very-elder friends I made and do enjoy that. So, need to ponder more.

Amber, thank you. I agree it was just a tiff but also share your concern about the rumbling thought that perhaps M disregarding my boundaries and then resenting me if I maintain them...is a worry. Seems to me that we are in very different places about communication, owning one's feelings and not reverting to passive-aggressive stuff. (Although I just read something that suggests I'm doing that too...one of the questions was, Do you avoid someone you're upset with? Truth is, I do. I feel I absolutely have to withdraw from him at times in order to calm myself. And maybe that's passive-aggression. Worth thinking about.)

Tupp, that perspective on M maybe not being ready himself really stopped me in my tracks. That was compassionate to where he is and really insightful. He has showered me with so much certainty about his commitment and determination about his feelings for me, our perfect fit forever, how absolutely positive he is...that it never occurred to me that in an unconscious way, he might be dealing with his own uncertainties by trying to drown them out. Huh. That's a really helpful thought. He really is spinning (great term, Lighter) and maybe that's one thing that's happening. He's using his intense verbal power to create such clouds of words and hyperbole that he can't get enough stillness in his head to allow any doubt, any frustration, and especially any uncertainty, to come through. It would demand he sit with the possibility of loss again. And that completely freaks him out.

Whew, whew, and I am sooooooooooo lucky y'all are here and willing to engage with this blow-by-blow stuff as I try to figure out whether M and I can navigate this relationship to a positive place.

I think he was also affected by the anniversary of his wife's death and reacting to it all over the place, while perhaps not realizing that's what he was doing. (He gets hyper-rational and all professor-superior when he's feeling something, and pronounces/declares/explains/holds forth about what is happening...to a degree that I think blinds him to some things. Certainly to tuning in with awareness and sensitivity to my feelings. He's struggling with his own and has his defensive tools, which come from all those years in authority.)

Ah well. I guess it's inevitable that relationships go through these painful lessons and adjustments, and the truth is, I can't yet see the result in clear focus. It'll take time and work. It's worth trying.

I still love the man. Still have hope for a happy future with him.

Hugs
Hops

 
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on September 22, 2019, 12:30:01 PM
Hops,

The red flag I see as you think out loud, is that you will have to "come up with a reason" for why you are wanting to go back to work and that you are concerned that it will alienate him if you do. Whether that would happen or not, there is something in your relationship with him that makes you think its likely, and your self-preservation is already trying to figure out how to protect yourself by making up an acceptable story about your thinking. The reason that worrieHops, CB

Hops, do you feel as though you've given up some of your freedom, at this point?
 The freedom to work as you wish, to come and go as you wish, to make plans sans M, as you wish?

Remember, my mama said.... "once you give up your freedom, you never get it back."  I think there's a lot of truth to that, and my mother was very strong in her relationship with her very strong husband.  He was wealthy when she met him, and wanted things his way.  When she stood up to him, he'd buck, then end up giggling, bc he adored her strength as much as he adored her soft, nurturing side.  The part of her that stood her ground was a delight to him, even though she had to put up with the discomfort of having him challenge her, and she did it with the certainty that her time, her space, her needs, wishes and desires were every bit as important as his. 

Just a story, Hops. Not even sure it applies.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on September 23, 2019, 11:12:28 AM
Thanks, all of you, so much.

CB, I get it, all the way. I think having had a stroke in June also affects my practical thinking. Am I tolerating more poor communication (over boundaries, including accepting a No) with M because I feel more fear about aging alone than I would if it'd been a decade or two back? It won't hurt me to go back to work. And now that I think about it, I doubt I'd even need to explain it to M. Just tell him, I decided to go back to work for a while, since going to Norway. Or, decided to sell my old car. (It's not worth much, I just love it and it's good in the winter.) The CRV is 17 years old with 150K miles and the "new" one is 11 with 50K! The difference is clear...only sensible to keep the Prius (was a miracle to get it cheap) and let go of the CRV. Decision made. At the moment the CRV is dead in the driveway since I haven't driven it enough to keep the battery happy. All mechanicals in it are great, maintenance kept up, tires are new. I'd accept getting snowed in, which I generally enjoy anyway.

Amber, this is the kernel of everything that stresses me with M:
Quote
I hear just a few worrisome things that mean the substance - M not liking or respecting your boundary and taking it the wrong way - could be a recurring situation.
It's both ironic and a relief that he's seeing his T today and I'm seeing mine, too.

Lighter, thanks for asking whether I've given up this:
Quote
The freedom to work as you wish, to come and go as you wish, to make plans sans M, as you wish?
I really haven't. And I won't/can't, etc.
I don't have concern that M would try to tell me what to do, where to go, who to see, time on my own. (I have a small amount of fear over how he'd handle "taking charge" of me if I were old and helpless, another stroke, for example.) He's not controlling in that he just accepts whatever I tell him I'm doing. If/when he's feeling insecure, he'll whiiiiiine "I haven't seen you in two daaaaaays!" as though it's pure misery. But he never indicates that he feels he is entitled to stop me from using my own time in my own way. I wouldn't let him anyway.

I think my biggest issue with him is simply the verbal stuff....I say No thanks and he perserverates and when he repeats and repeats and repeats something to get his way I reach a point where I think my head will explode. Lately, when he does this, it's begun to affect my feelings for him.

Last night, after his departmental picnic (which I greatly enjoyed, beautiful place near the mountains, wonderful conversations) we talked a lot on the ride home. I told him flat out that our previous struggle for intimacy when I kept saying No, don't do that and he persisted was actually traumatic for me, and that when I'd told him so, he'd switched the topic instantly to how HE felt. And I get it, that it was upsetting to him for different reasons, but that I'd never felt heard about it and that the way it went down since, with the stupid argument over him asking me to come over yesterday to watch him make beans....had added together to give me a serious doubt about our future that I hadn't had before. He sobered right up and said we need to set a time to seriously talk through all this. I asked him if he knew was gaslighting was, and he didn't, and when I explained it, he said that is NOT me, that sounds malicious and mean and cruel and I'm upset that you'd make that comparison. (It's true, he's not mean.)

My overall concern is that getting through to him, through whatever it is that prevents him from taking in the information when I set a boundary or say NO, is so exhausting and stressful. I repeated that one of the biggest issues for me is that when I say No, he doesn't accept it, but keeps pounding and pounding on what he wants. I had a feeling that he heard me. I think he was shocked that I was now saying, No, I'm not certain about marriage now. That got through to him, I think.

(He was repeatedly bringing up marriage yesterday, house buying, the whole original plan. So on some level he knows this is critical. And that's good.)

He still doesn't get the difference between an I-message and a You-message (I know, Amber, this is probably seeing things through the psychobabble filter). He likes to say: I feel that YOU... and merrily goes about analysing me, and never analyses himself.

Thank god for therapy, is all I can say. On we go. He's picking me up at noon because I lost the fob to the Prius in the grass out at the picnic. I'll take the backup one over there today to retrieve my car.

Later this afternoon the young Spanish poet is coming by with his lovely wife and we'll drink wine and brainstorm some ideas for releasing his new book locally. I have a couple outlets in mind that have nothing to do with the University.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on September 24, 2019, 03:58:09 AM
Just a very quick thing, Hops, that occurred to me reading your last post, and it's of a practical nature - when you tell M "No thanks" do you or are you able to offer an alternative instead?  Just wondering, with my autistic hat on - I know that my son (and myself, to a certain extent) always needs 'something' - an empty space in front of him, literally or metaphorically, is too much to cope with and causes anxiety.  It just popped out at me as you mention M's repeated questioning if you don't want to do something.  I'm just wondering if he can't cope without a Plan B - and if you being able to suggest one might take his anxious response away?

You may already be doing this, and, of course, he might just not like to take no for an answer :)  But it might be something worth trying to see if it helps? xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on September 24, 2019, 09:15:44 AM
Quote
He still doesn't get the difference between an I-message and a You-message (I know, Amber, this is probably seeing things through the psychobabble filter). He likes to say: I feel that YOU... and merrily goes about analysing me, and never analyses himself.

If so, it's important psychobabble Hops. Hol got back Sunday. Steve went to work; John's off on the next leg of his journey... and so she's already started prescribing the things I MUST do without understanding that I don't tell HER "you need to do that" without expecting her to resist or do it when she wants to. Of her own volition, she's ordered a book that includes enmeshment, co-dependence, etc. She's even micro-analyzing what I've shared with her about Buck and now "worrying" that I'm falling into the same traps as previous relationships. SIGH. I've told her I don't need a minder, a trainer, or a mom. It's not sinking in. There is merit in her suggestions, but I still have a strong reflex to resist being TOLD to do anything. (kinda a co-dependence over reaction, I think)

The other thing I thought of, is maybe you can explain to M - that "no" isn't a once & for all time "no". It's just "no, not now". Maybe that would stop his spin up into anxiety in it's tracks. Also, maybe discuss with your T... when it's helpful, to put aside your "no" and please him in that instance... and when you need to say "no" because it's in your best interests; it's protective of you. Both participants in a relationship need to sometimes give up our "I don't really want to, feel comfortable, whatever doing that even though I can see it's important to you". But hear me - that HAS to be a 2 way street for it to work. (Without score keeping)

I'm struggling in the dark right along with ya Hops. The message Hol keeps sending is there's something wrong with the way I am and she knows exactly how to make me better - and doesn't seem to acknowledge that that may not BE ME. Buck, thankfully, isn't making any noises like that at all. He seems to get a real enjoyment out of my autonomy and watching me do things in my fashion. She's kinda expanding what she sees about me, in recent statements teasing me about being "upper management" around here. LOL. There is hope; just have to work through it.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on September 24, 2019, 11:35:03 AM
(((((((Amber)))) Responded about Hol over on Farm Life. Meanwhile, I'm grateful you brought up my struggle with M not accepting a NO. (Not before an endless campaign of ignoring it and/or verbally pounding at me over and over about it, until the NO becomes overwhelming.)

I think in many smaller matters I have intentionally turned my No into a Why Not or Yes. Yes, I'd like to please him. He turns almost every effort I make to give to him into his issue of no no no, I am the one who provides, serves, is generous and sacrificial. I had to talk to him about receiving...how if he deflects every gesture I try to make to express love and gratitude to him, that hurt. He worked on it. Doing the surprise birthday dinner for him was a big one. But even there, he turned to me and said, I'd be happy to pay for this...one look and he gave it up, but his compulsion was still there to take away that opportunity from me. HE is the Giver, the Big Person, the Magnanimous Papa figure. It's not all ego, a lot of it is how he was raised.

Recently, I took my biggest No, contemplated loving him and wanting to bring him happiness, and flipped it into a profound Yes. He wound up kind of letting loose of my gift in a way that puzzled me, but it was still a happy thing to do and share.

On the other hand, I think my boundaries are too rigid in some ways. My T has said to me several times that she feels I am not over-reacting to his pressure. But she only hears my narrative, not his.

I identified for M recently that the pattern I worry most about is that although I delight in him as a companion (we are crazily compatible talking, dining, traveling, bantering, exploring, laughing, socializing with others) ... where I have the most trouble is when I believe he is crossing personal boundaries into my personal autonomy. I may be over-threatened by these in others' eyes, but here they are:

--My Family. He trespassed into my relationship with my D by sending her a message behind my back about my feelings, and then by talking about "his plan" to contact and help her, that he would "let me know" when he has decided "what he intends to do." I was in fury until he grasped that he is not to do ANYTHING in her direction unless he explicitly ASKS ME about it first. She is my child, not his. For now, we've dropped that discussion. He was fantasizing a paternal relationship with her, "the daughter I never had" that was both kind and clueless (her purpose in the world is not to make him feel more saintly). He understands nothing at all about her mental illness, my loss and how it feels and kept poking at it, bringing it up over and over and over because it made HIM so sad--and thus making me re-experience an anguishing loss I'd grieved as much as I could without dying. (Repetition, repetition....). He FINALLY realized how grave this was for me, and dropped it. Though there've been a few very subtle gestures about her lately. (I think he resents me having drawn such a firm boundary there.)

--My Health. He directly ignored an explicit request my friend conveyed (nicely) for me when I was in the ER, that I did not want him to come back yet into the area where I was being treated. He told my friend, "Oh she's confused. I have to be there, I'll 'take the heat':... ) and persuaded her to let him take over. When I asked later, did she convey my request that you NOT come back? He said yes. I asked, so why did you? He said, "My feelings compelled me to." So the wishes of the stressed and overwhelmed patient, me, were irrelevant because his feelings were strong. It was NOT comforting having him in the cubicle; it added to my stress while I was in the middle of a stroke and focusing on responding to the providers. The next day I was (and remain) so grateful to have him there and very moved by his overall support (though he kept interrupting my conversation with my doctors). But the night before, he did not care about my privacy, my vulnerability, my humiliation (I was having medication not only injected but stuffed up my ass and was NOT ready to share that moment with a boyfriend I hadn't been intimate with) or my CHOICE. He found his choice romantic. I found it disrespectful and, honestly, selfish. (So I hesitate to trust him with health issues. A recent example, his insistent drama about the monitor, magnifying HIS sense of crisis into a routine appointment I was managing calmlly. Another: The other night I shared something about how ADD affects my time management and he responded dismissively, "Oh, I don't think you have ADD. You may have gotten some diagnosis, but I don't perceive it." And "Somebody wanted to put one of my sons on ADD meds!" I don't even take Rx. I was 60 when diagnosed, and immensely relieved by it. But what got to me was his entitlement to dismiss it and attitude of superiority about his knowledge. So that's another health thing I don't feel safe sharing about.)

--My Friendships. I had a tiff with a friend, coincidentally also a professor, and shared it with him because it was sad. It was just a friend story. He said, Oh I'll take care of this because as a professor I can reach out to her with some invitation because we're technically colleagues. I didn't want him to do this. I wasn't looking for him to take over and issue some invitation. I am capable of resolving or making decisions around my personal friendships myself, and didn't need or want his involvement, which would've made the whole delicate dialogue with her much more difficult. (So I regretted confiding in him about something I'd ordinarily love to share with a partner. By the way, she and I are okay again.) After the bday party he made a big deal of writing my friends to thank them for coming (which was very nice, and appropriate) and at the same time declare to them that he was extremely grateful and wanted to thank them for being good friends for me (which struck them as odd). They've been my personal friends for decades, barely know him, and frankly don't need my boyfriend to praise them for caring about me. It's...paternalistic. Well meant, but still.

--My Time. When I periodically need to retreat to recharge (as an "introverted extrovert") he emails, calls, sends intense messages about how he needs to drop off food gifts even after I politely decline ("But it's fresh! You don't even have to answer the door!") etc, etc. It ensures that I keep thinking about him, I'm guessing. I'm probably thinking about him anyway, but don't need my sanctuary time structured around his desperation to not sense the umbilical cord stretch. (So now, thanks to Tupp, I have to spell out--radio silence.)

--My History. I shared with him in France the story of a very painful hurt I'd experienced with my second husband. (Which I'd grieved, recovered from, and basically put away...I rarely think of him.) M brought it up about TEN TIMES since because it made HIM so sad. I finally explained that I appreciated how compassionate he was about that experience, but that it was many many years ago, that I had healed from it and moved on, and that I'd really appreciate it, now that he understood it, if he would not bring it up again. "I promise. I'll never mention it again," says M, as he often does. He brought it up again yesterday. (This is what I mean about repeat, repeat, repeat.) He had a pretext. Doesn't matter. It makes me not trust his "I promise." He is appalled, "You've said you don't TRUST me! My intentions are always pure and good! Because I love you so DEEPLY.") Oy.

--My Body. In the most vulnerable of situations, he persisted in a way of touching that was uncomfortable and distressing to me. I said No over and over and he ignored it. Shhhhh! Shhhhh! I left and burst into tears when I got home. I had and have much compassion for why it's an emergency to him and in some degree, how his own anxiety and goal focus overwhelm him. But despite compassion, I can't abandon my own self, my own body, to his agenda without knowing that if I say Yes, or No, in the moment I will be heard. (Not after he's repeated and repeated whatever he wants....over my objections.) He apologized profusely and sincerely by email, but also came back when I tried to talk about it in person. "I wept too" and more, which pretty much shut me down. The other day I told him I didn't feel heard and that experience was still unresolved for me. He said he wanted to listen and we should take time to sit down and he would. I'm doubtful but hopeful. For me, it's a traumatic memory, if that word isn't too extreme. So all that's on hold and I'm reluctant to re-engage at that level. Not without help.

Looking for some good news? Talking with my T, I asked her to recommend couples counselors to interview. She said it wasn't if we needed it, but when, and it's time, and suggested names. Happily, he's agreed and is also asking his T for suggestions. We'll see one from each list to find one we both like, etc. I had told him recently, when he asked again about marriage (repeat repeat) that I honestly now have doubt I didn't have before. So he's taking it very seriously. That's good. A relief.

He's never wavered about how much he loves me and wants me as his lifetime companion and no one else will do and I'm the love of his life. I believe his feelings are real; it's only some behaviors that get to me. He says if I know his intention is good (I do) that nothing else should matter (I don't agree, and told him even when there is real love, sometimes relationships still don't work.) I'm wavering now, but I do still love him, and I'll be very sad if it doesn't work out. However, I am also clear that my life would continue. It would be a lot harder, and having a stroke I'd be helpless and without a direct advocate (my friends are great but not THAT available), and I won't pretend that security isn't one of my motivations. I'll be 70 this spring. Having him to love and live with and care for going forward I believe would be a happier life for me than continuing alone. Winter is coming, literally and metaphorically.

And....for most of the hours we've been together, he's been a delightful companion. I believe we will both do our sincere best in the counseling, and that the hope lies there. Maybe all the baggage two people this age are dragging is just a little complicated. And at heart, he is an ethical person, and has kind intentions. We're also just beginning to take a look at how some things I find smothering are actually cultural differences, as CB referenced...in how he shows love. That's helpful. Dunno if it'll save us but it reduces my worry, to see some of his behavior in a less personal context.

Meanwhile, we're off to California later next month to "meet the kids" and I'm truly looking forward to it.

Thanks for listening to all that, all-a y'all.

love
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on September 24, 2019, 12:47:23 PM
Aw, Hopsie, it is very difficult.  All the things you mention would drive me nuts so I don't think you're over reacting.  Meltdowns over leaving the tube off the toothpaste are over-reactions, in my opinion, but the things you mention are all very valid and I understand why they've made you feel the way they do.  Equally, I can understand, oh so much, not wanting to spend your future years alone on a low income, particularly after the recent health scare - having our own mortality shoved in our faces is frightening and reminds us we're getting older.

I think something that is difficult when dating older men (maybe you need a toyboy? lol) is that the 'me Tarzan, you Jane' thing has been drummed into them from such a young age and it's possibly quite alien to him to have a female companion that doesn't need him to take charge and organise everything at the drop of a hat. 

I guess the good thing is that you're both willing to work on it and, as you say, the good times are amazingly good.  I guess that time is going to pass, whatever you do now, and if it did sadly not work out with M, at least you'd know you'd both given it your best shot.  I think I'd be inclined to keep working on things all the time the good stuff outweighed the bad stuff, as it seems to at present.  I hope the couples thing helps; as you say, your current T's only hear your side of the story (respectively) so it will be interesting to hear what a therapist has to say about both of your perceptions of the same event and might help you find a middle ground.  I am keeping fingers crossed it goes well :)  You deserve to be happy xx xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on September 24, 2019, 02:04:15 PM
Thank you, ((((Tupp)))). Your take on how I feel is comforting and validating. Professors can be VERY persuasive, until they encounter the Stubborn Student! You're right, my concerns are legitimate. But so are his. I'm very hopeful the couple-counseling will help. He is motivated to the moon not to lose me, and I'm not far behind him. So given that he's brilliant and motivated, maybe it'll be a remarkable learning curve. My smarts are different but my love for him is real (plus that sketchy other motivation you are so forgiving about). I dunno the outcome, but I'll ask the universe for what I'd like, and give it my all.

I also agree with you that there'd be no point in bailing right now, just because it's getting hard. Relationships take Work. And either way--either for the reward of having worked so hard to create a happy future marriage that it's even more satisfying, or of having worked so hard that even in grieving an ended relationship, we have the knowledge that we both tried our very best. Until I can say that authentically, having also confronted my own dysfunctions, I am not ready to pull the plug.

Like you, I don't know what I would have done without this forum. And I have learned more than I can express from every voice hear.

I am sooooo grateful for the support.

love
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on September 24, 2019, 02:51:58 PM
Thank you, ((((Tupp)))). Your take on how I feel is comforting and validating. Professors can be VERY persuasive, until they encounter the Stubborn Student! You're right, my concerns are legitimate. But so are his. I'm very hopeful the couple-counseling will help. He is motivated to the moon not to lose me, and I'm not far behind him. So given that he's brilliant and motivated, maybe it'll be a remarkable learning curve. My smarts are different but my love for him is real (plus that sketchy other motivation you are so forgiving about). I dunno the outcome, but I'll ask the universe for what I'd like, and give it my all.

I also agree with you that there'd be no point in bailing right now, just because it's getting hard. Relationships take Work. And either way--either for the reward of having worked so hard to create a happy future marriage that it's even more satisfying, or of having worked so hard that even in grieving an ended relationship, we have the knowledge that we both tried our very best. Until I can say that authentically, having also confronted my own dysfunctions, I am not ready to pull the plug.

Like you, I don't know what I would have done without this forum. And I have learned more than I can express from every voice hear.

I am sooooo grateful for the support.

love
Hops

I think the motivation to try is the important thing, Hops, that part is so important, particularly as you're both so willing.  And it's so realistic as well.  Far more people would avoid unhappy marriages if they had these open, frank discussions beforehand instead of going down the Hollywood 'love will conquer all' pathway.

I've probably told this story before, but I remember an Asian friend years ago explaining the arranged marriage scenario to me.  It sounded so sensible.  An introduction was suggested, usually by friends or family, and a phone conversation took place.  And during that phone conversation they'd have a really frank, open discussion - do you want children?  private or state school?  will you give up work after having children?  do you cook?  Will your mother live with us?  And so on.  Very factual, very frank, and all the sorts of topics that couples end up rowing about and falling out over.  It sounded so sensible to me, it just weeded out unsuitables straight away.  When she did meet someone (randomly, it wasn't arranged) her Dad insisted on seeing his bank statements.  And most people would think that so rude but I thought, do you know what, he wants to make sure his girl is with a good un and he's not just taking his word for it.  Imagine the difference if everyone approached marriage in such a calm and collected way?

All a bit off kilter, but I'm just trying to say I think being really frank and open is a good thing, and I think it makes sense to work on things now instead of rushing off to get married and then realising it was a mistake.  I am still hopefull things will work out :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on September 25, 2019, 08:41:22 AM
Ya know Hops, you and I kind of have different "styles" about this kind of relationship. That's the way it should be, IMO. We also have our different views about what we want; will accept; try to give and when, etc. And after 10+ years of back & forth support we're still friends. Even a couple of toe tramplings in there - we got over it. LOL.

I let your last post marinate overnight. I've been guilty of just reacting off the cuff lately and I wanted to make sure my response didn't just make things more confusing. I saw some disturbing patterns emerging in your recent description. Disturbing for me; if I was in your shoes. I'm not going to go into them because you seem to be trying sort out the "why" or reason behind them yourself; quite well actually. That reason will be damned important going forward.

I wish for you to find happiness and companionship with a partner who truly knows and appreciates you for WHO YOU ARE, without trying to remodel you into what he wants. For the sake of his own comfort. You get downright fierce about protecting your boundaries so I'm not worried about ya. Despite your caring & compassionate nature.

But it was the image of M in a "saintly" role in the relationship - justified by his massive love for you - that got my attention. As you've realized, there are lots of explanations for why you're perceiving this so clearly and the truest explanation will be what matters. Even with couples therapy and tools for working through the issue, this is something you'll have to live with and accommodate for a long time. So it's vital you have that information before proceeding. You know how long it takes to truly change things like this in ourselves.

It perfectly OK to slow things down enough to address the issue Hops. I think you'll be fine.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on September 25, 2019, 03:58:48 PM
(((((((Amber)))) Responded about Hol over on Farm Life. Meanwhile, I'm grateful you brought up my struggle with M not accepting a NO. (Not before an endless campaign of ignoring it and/or verbally pounding at me over and over about it, until the NO becomes overwhelming.)

I think in many smaller matters I have intentionally turned my No into a Why Not or Yes. Yes, I'd like to please him. He turns almost every effort I make to give to him into his issue of no no no, I am the one who provides, serves, is generous and sacrificial. I had to talk to him about receiving...how if he deflects every gesture I try to make to express love and gratitude to him, that hurt. He worked on it. Doing the surprise birthday dinner for him was a big one. But even there, he turned to me and said, I'd be happy to pay for this...one look and he gave it up, but his compulsion was still there to take away that opportunity from me. HE is the Giver, the Big Person, the Magnanimous Papa figure. It's not all ego, a lot of it is how he was raised.
I know I've posted this before, but Bill and I struggled with being "the giver" in our relationship too.  I had to talk myself out of many trees, and make a conscious decision to let Bill have that.  I learned to find comfort in receiving, the it became joy.
When he died I felt a profound loss I'd never before known, and come to appreciate.


Recently, I took my biggest No, contemplated loving him and wanting to bring him happiness, and flipped it into a profound Yes. He wound up kind of letting loose of my gift in a way that puzzled me, but it was still a happy thing to do and share.

On the other hand, I think my boundaries are too rigid in some ways. My T has said to me several times that she feels I am not over-reacting to his pressure. But she only hears my narrative, not his.

I identified for M recently that the pattern I worry most about is that although I delight in him as a companion (we are crazily compatible talking, dining, traveling, bantering, exploring, laughing, socializing with others) ... where I have the most trouble is when I believe he is crossing personal boundaries into my personal autonomy. I may be over-threatened by these in others' eyes, but here they are:

--My Family. He trespassed into my relationship with my D by sending her a message behind my back about my feelings, and then by talking about "his plan" to contact and help her, that he would "let me know" when he has decided "what he intends to do." I was in fury until he grasped that he is not to do ANYTHING in her direction unless he explicitly ASKS ME about it first. She is my child, not his. For now, we've dropped that discussion. He was fantasizing a paternal relationship with her, "the daughter I never had" that was both kind and clueless (her purpose in the world is not to make him feel more saintly). He understands nothing at all about her mental illness, my loss and how it feels and kept poking at it, bringing it up over and over and over because it made HIM so sad--and thus making me re-experience an anguishing loss I'd grieved as much as I could without dying. (Repetition, repetition....). I see your point, but also see his side.  Yearning to help and connect, and perhaps heal.  Since my oldedt18 dd connects so deeply with my brother the idea of M connecting with your dd brings up positive emotions and hope....and then I look through your eyes again, and know your right to have boundaries, and insist M respects them.He FINALLY realized how grave this was for me, and dropped it. Though there've been a few very subtle gestures about her lately. (I think he resents me having drawn such a firm boundary there.)

--My Health. He directly ignored an explicit request my friend conveyed (nicely) for me when I was in the ER, that I did not want him to come back yet into the area where I was being treated. He told my friend, "Oh she's confused. I have to be there, I'll 'take the heat':... ) and persuaded her to let him take over. When I asked later, did she convey my request that you NOT come back? He said yes. I asked, so why did you? He said, "My feelings compelled me to." So the wishes of the stressed and overwhelmed patient, me, were irrelevant because his feelings were strong. It was NOT comforting having him in the cubicle; it added to my stress while I was in the middle of a stroke and focusing on responding to the providers. The next day I was (and remain) so grateful to have him there and very moved by his overall support (though he kept interrupting my conversation with my doctors). But the night before, he did not care about my privacy, my vulnerability, my humiliation (I was having medication not only injected but stuffed up my ass and was NOT ready to share that moment with a boyfriend I hadn't been intimate with) or my CHOICE. He found his choice romantic. I found it disrespectful and, honestly, selfish. (So I hesitate to trust him with health issues. A recent example, his insistent drama about the monitor, magnifying HIS sense of crisis into a routine appointment I was managing calmlly. Another: The other night I shared something about how ADD affects my time management and he responded dismissively, "Oh, I don't think you have ADD. You may have gotten some diagnosis, but I don't perceive it." And "Somebody wanted to put one of my sons on ADD meds!" I don't even take Rx. I was 60 when diagnosed, and immensely relieved by it. But what got to me was his entitlement to dismiss it and attitude of superiority about his knowledge. So that's another health thing I don't feel safe sharing about.)

--My Friendships. I had a tiff with a friend, coincidentally also a professor, and shared it with him because it was sad. It was just a friend story. He said, Oh I'll take care of this because as a professor I can reach out to her with some invitation because we're technically colleagues. I didn't want him to do this. I wasn't looking for him to take over and issue some invitation. I am capable of resolving or making decisions around my personal friendships myself, and didn't need or want his involvement, which would've made the whole delicate dialogue with her much more difficult. (So I regretted confiding in him about something I'd ordinarily love to share with a partner. By the way, she and I are okay again.) After the bday party he made a big deal of writing my friends to thank them for coming (which was very nice, and appropriate) and at the same time declare to them that he was extremely grateful and wanted to thank them for being good friends for me (which struck them as odd). They've been my personal friends for decades, barely know him, and frankly don't need my boyfriend to praise them for caring about me. It's...paternalistic. Well meant, but still.

--My Time. When I periodically need to retreat to recharge (as an "introverted extrovert") he emails, calls, sends intense messages about how he needs to drop off food gifts even after I politely decline ("But it's fresh! You don't even have to answer the door!") etc, etc. It ensures that I keep thinking about him, I'm guessing. I'm probably thinking about him anyway, but don't need my sanctuary time structured around his desperation to not sense the umbilical cord stretch. (So now, thanks to Tupp, I have to spell out--radio silence.)

--My History. I shared with him in France the story of a very painful hurt I'd experienced with my second husband. (Which I'd grieved, recovered from, and basically put away...I rarely think of him.) M brought it up about TEN TIMES since because it made HIM so sad. I finally explained that I appreciated how compassionate he was about that experience, but that it was many many years ago, that I had healed from it and moved on, and that I'd really appreciate it, now that he understood it, if he would not bring it up again. "I promise. I'll never mention it again," says M, as he often does. He brought it up again yesterday. (This is what I mean about repeat, repeat, repeat.) He had a pretext. Doesn't matter. It makes me not trust his "I promise." He is appalled, "You've said you don't TRUST me! My intentions are always pure and good! Because I love you so DEEPLY.") Oy.

--My Body. In the most vulnerable of situations, he persisted in a way of touching that was uncomfortable and distressing to me. I said No over and over and he ignored it. Shhhhh! Shhhhh! I left and burst into tears when I got home. I had and have much compassion for why it's an emergency to him and in some degree, how his own anxiety and goal focus overwhelm him. But despite compassion, I can't abandon my own self, my own body, to his agenda without knowing that if I say Yes, or No, in the moment I will be heard. (Not after he's repeated and repeated whatever he wants....over my objections.) He apologized profusely and sincerely by email, but also came back when I tried to talk about it in person. "I wept too" and more, which pretty much shut me down. The other day I told him I didn't feel heard and that experience was still unresolved for me. He said he wanted to listen and we should take time to sit down and he would. I'm doubtful but hopeful. For me, it's a traumatic memory, if that word isn't too extreme. So all that's on hold and I'm reluctant to re-engage at that level. Not without help.

Looking for some good news? Talking with my T, I asked her to recommend couples counselors to interview. She said it wasn't if we needed it, but when, and it's time, and suggested names. Happily, he's agreed and is also asking his T for suggestions. We'll see one from each list to find one we both like, etc. I had told him recently, when he asked again about marriage (repeat repeat) that I honestly now have doubt I didn't have before. So he's taking it very seriously. That's good. A relief.
It seems like he's willing to try, and is capable of learning.  I think digging into the why of his codependence will be super helpful, but super painful too.
If anyone can help him figure this out you can Hopsy.  Hopefully a good T will shorten the journey, and be helpful  for you both.


He's never wavered about how much he loves me and wants me as his lifetime companion and no one else will do and I'm the love of his life. I believe his feelings are real; it's only some behaviors that get to me. He says if I know his intention is good (I do) that nothing else should matter (I don't agree, and told him even when there is real love, sometimes relationships still don't work.) I'm wavering now, but I do still love him, and I'll be very sad if it doesn't work out. However, I am also clear that my life would continue. It would be a lot harder, and having a stroke I'd be helpless and without a direct advocate (my friends are great but not THAT available), and I won't pretend that security isn't one of my motivations. I'll be 70 this spring. Having him to love and live with and care for going forward I believe would be a happier life for me than continuing alone. Winter is coming, literally and metaphorically.  I think your strength and belief in yourself makes you a better partner.  I think it gives you more space to work out the things that come between you. 

And....for most of the hours we've been together, he's been a delightful companion. I believe we will both do our sincere best in the counseling, and that the hope lies there. Maybe all the baggage two people this age are dragging is just a little complicated. And at heart, he is an ethical person, and has kind intentions. We're also just beginning to take a look at how some things I find smothering are actually cultural differences, as CB referenced...in how he shows love. That's helpful. Dunno if it'll save us but it reduces my worry, to see some of his behavior in a less personal context.  Yes....stay curious, Hops.

Meanwhile, we're off to California later next month to "meet the kids" and I'm truly looking forward to it.  Have a good time.  Lighter

Thanks for listening to all that, all-a y'all.

love
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on September 25, 2019, 05:15:46 PM
Thanks, Lighter.
The thing about M and my D is this: He doesn't know her. She doesn't (or didn't) know of his existence. I would have had no intention of sharing such personal news because: 1) she does not speak to me (8 years now) and is not presently in my life. 2) the pain of thinking of her is vicious, so I avoid doing so as much as possible. 3) M talks nonstop, and repetitively, about whatever pops into his head or engages his sentiments. He was oblivious about how much anguish he was raking up for me every time he probed about her. So that boundary had to be battled for with enormous stress.

I get what you mean about giving, and Bill. I have learned to accept much more comfortably and gratefully. There are just excesses in M's personality that mean although he's quite sincere, he does go on and on about how wonderful it is to give and how that is so natural to him and is his delight and purpose and so forth. I guess, in a subtle way, listening to all that self-praise is the attached string. Doesn't really have much to do with expenses or costs, as it does with M's personality/ego.

Thanks, Amber. By all means:
Quote
I saw some disturbing patterns emerging in your recent description. Disturbing for me; if I was in your shoes. I'm not going to go into them because you seem to be trying sort out the "why" or reason behind them yourself

Please DO "go into them" if you'd like. The whole reason I'm here is for help and feedback! For which I'm extremely grateful.

And thanks, Tupp!
Where can I rent some stern, loving Asian parents??????????????????

M followed up promptly and we have two prelimiary consultations with couples counselors set up. I'm very glad.

love y'all oodles,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on September 26, 2019, 08:40:42 AM
Hops, if I had more confidence in my perspective right now, you know the irrepressible comments would come out. But I don't. Not at the moment. It's more important that you form your own judgement or discernment about this, anyway. Mine would be irrelevant unless I really thought you were missing something important.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on September 26, 2019, 10:56:59 AM
I hope M realizes you accept him as a human being.

You're taking issue with some of his behaviors, just as he's uncomfortable with some of yours, and that's OK.

I wish every couple took worked to resolve their issues before things get more complicated, and it's hard to find the original thread.   

Everyone has issues.

::nodding::.

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on September 26, 2019, 04:07:13 PM
Thanks, Lighter. I think you hit on a nuance. I do accept M as a human being, and only struggle with some of his behaviors. He's both so sensitive and so insecure that he doesn't have the psychological strength to have his behavior challenged. He's quite defensive, always with genuine feelings of being deeply wounded or "stung" when I imply that some of what he does creates a trust challenge for me.

Amber, hon, your thinking is relevant to me. I don't have to agree with or echo your perspective, of course. But I always value and appreciate it. You can offer whatever you want to, and not worry about "protecting" me in regard to me drawing my own conclusions or trusting my own decisions. As we all do, I take in everything because all our intentions here to help are so deeply evident. But naturally, I sift everything for what works and echoes, and whatever doesn't, drifts in and on. (Thank god nobody takes my voluminous opinions and advice as de riguer!) Just want you to know your thinking is valuable to me, whenever you're inspired to share it. (But no pressure to do so if you ain't inspired to.)

Gratefully,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on September 27, 2019, 10:43:57 AM
Hops:

I'm just going to write down what comes up around you and M right now.  Take what makes sense, and forget the rest.

I think M believes whatever is good for him, is good for you... and the relationship.  It's a POV, and you're challenging it. He's shocked, bc that's not been his experience up to this point.   That's not right or wrong, it's just how he's feeling, kwim?

He likely does have the best of intentions for you, your happiness, and future with him, and I think you feel that too? 

I also think you're strength, autonomy, and personal POV is as exciting as it is scary for him.  That word "challenge" keeps coming up for me here.  You're challenging some of his world view, and how he operates in it with a partner.

I think he has some fear, and that's normal.  It's very harmful, in this case, to his ability to hear you and use reason.

He's going to have to find a way to calm himself down, and focus.  He's up against old default pathways here, so I hope some breathing exercises are included in T.... he needs to take his biology back, and shift back into adult/creative/problem solving mode, IMO.


I'm afraid you're the professor in these matters, and he's the student.  That's not going to add to M's comfort either, IME. 

Understanding that this is about you and M working together to sort things out.... might help M calm down.

You want to know what M really needs, and M needs to be able to ask what you really need, and be responsive to them.  It goes both ways. 

I really look forward to M understanding that he's loved, and whole, and accepted, even when you "challenge" him. I really want to read posts where he's secure enough to be upset, then bounce back with admiration for your pluck.  He chose a strong woman.  Once he feels more secure, I think he'll have an easier time finding his admiration.

The truth is, most couples who experience crisis, and do this difficult work to overcome it, come out incredibly strong.  I think you can say that, up front, to M.   Working through these housekeeping matters is intended to bring more joy and stability for you both. That's an amazing,  intelligent aspiration, IMO.

I hope M can learn to make that shift into observer mode, and get curious about what you want and need.  That defensive stance is not working for either of you, and you don't intend offense.  You're Hops!  He should learn that, and internalize it.  The sooner the better.

In all your posts I feel positive connection, and his ability to do this work. 

That M shifts into fight or flight mode, and can't get out,  explains why he's not able to understand, listen, or problem solve.  He's smart enough, he just needs help learning how to unhook those darned alarm bells so he can hear, help make a plan, and follow through. 

And that's how I feel about that.

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on September 27, 2019, 01:18:31 PM
Lighter, THANK YOU.

This is a deeply perceptive, insightful and (hopefully) empowering post. I really appreciate the deep thought and the effort of it, too.

You articulate a very nuanced, compassionate and profound view-from-a-distance. That distance has actually enabled you to see what we're trying, as well as what we're up against, so clearly. Much more clearly than I have been able to, in fact. You also wisely reminded me to see the truth I'm trying to tell as ultimately good for both M and me. As his will be for me, regardless, because I care intensely about reality over delusion to guide my decision about a life with him.

I have a lot of hope pinned on whichever couples counselor we choose. I loved your phrase, "he needs to take back his biology." I'm not a teacher for that, but perhaps his own T could be, if M sees it and brings it up to him.

M seems to have a good deal of receptivity for what his own T observes. So I'm hopeful.

It's true it would be a massive relief to be heard somewhere that might make a difference. I'm not saying a counselor is going to pat me on the head and castigate M. I don't need or want either of those to happen. But I do yearn for a room in which M's runaway-talk-train can't overwhelm me, and where a neutral observer can guide us both in listening deeply to each other. Or, more likely, to reflect back to us when and what we have not heard well. And help us pace through the whole thing without panic -- either his or mine.

What you said about POV, and how it's not something to judge but just see as what impact my challenges to it are having...was incredibly helpful.

Above all, I think your analysis carries great compassion for M. And I appreciate that a lot. When I feel threatened or devoured or overwhelmed by the bigness of his emotions and nonstop expression of them...I can lose my internal commitment to compassion.

Basically, you've reminded me to remember my strength. I'm trying. I think the stroke, a cardiac monitor stuck on my chest, reading a recent detailed test result about my abnormal heart rhythms, and the actual physical sensations I feel in my chest when under big emotional stress...it's really my health that I'm trying to protect.

My personal challenge is to also calm down, and try to hold my balance and a calmer center when I'm in his company. It's a big challenge. But to continue toward the good stuff prevailing, I have to try to meet it.

Thanks again.

Gratefully,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on September 28, 2019, 10:34:16 AM
Hops:

I believe you're the professor when it comes to exploring one's inner world, and shifting into observer mode. You know more about things being OK, even when they aren't OK, or don't seem OK.
 I call it the
"hold....
hold....
hold....." pattern of sitting with difficult feelings.  Some of life is learning how to DO that, and I was just talking to my T about it.  That skill, and it's usefulness.

If we can sit, and not go chattering on or DOING DOING DOING to escape difficult feelings.  Just waiting when we're in distress.  Not following old pathways, but turning attention inward to see what's there, what comes up.  M hasn't learned how to SEE his actions, thoughts, and feelings without judgment and panic.... yet. He hasn't learned to shift into your POV either.

 You have.  You do it all the time here, for him

I remember reading posts of yours, years ago, about just sitting with our difficult feelings.  Was that really 10 or so years ago?  More maybe?  And it took me this long to follow that thread to a place I could understand.

 You're up ahead, now, for M.  Shining a light if he'll see it.  Helping him learn to sit with his discomfort, for it has a message, and will not kill him, though his alarm bells warn they will.  This is the edge of epiphany for this lovely smart man.  I don't think he understands temporary upheaval is just temporary.   

You do. 

I wish he could see your intention to build safe happy space for the both of you.  I wish he could imagine you, as companion, when you feel comfort enough to love without fear or reservation.
 To love him without doubt.   

It's not an easy concept for a child, or panicked person to understand.... you flailing away, bc you require more distance in order to be OK with closeness and intimacy with M.   
Lord. 
That's hurtful to a person who can't stand space.  He's creating a need for more and more space with hiseifforts to close the distance.  ::shaking head::  And he can't SEE how that's going to go. You can. So YES... you're the one with more knowledge in these matters, and we'll see how the professor handles a woman of depth and unfamiliar substance.   

I guess M's T sessions will teach him the art of horse whispering.... not to BECOME a new person, or lose himself, but to shift into a new way of BEING inside himself.  Spending time in a horse corral is something kids do in Wilderness Camp.  They learn how to work together with an intense focus to gain a horse's trust, and cooperation.  They have to see things through the horse's POV, and I guess I just said you're the horse there, so forgive me, but that's my short version of that.

I agree, a good T will help you. 
Help M lean into change, and embrace it. 
Not fear it. 

Help M "hear" you, Yes.
The fear has to go for him to Do that, IME.


No one would ever think you'd want M castigated in a T session, and it's interesting you write that out, bc... you feel some discomfort around how your motives will be interpreted?  What was that about, Hops? 

And I'm sending you healing waves of pink light ((Hops)).  I wish I could send the spirits of nuns and nurses from Nonnatus House on Call The Midwife.  To hold our hands, and see this monitor business through.  To shield, and comfort you.  To lend their filters when you're overwhelmed and feeling devoured.

More deep breathing, for all of us,  is a good thing. That's where the calm is, IME.

Lighter



Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on September 28, 2019, 04:25:40 PM
Thanks, Lighter.

I am hoping but do not know whether I'm strong enough to serve as a model of calm, and sitting with difficult feelings, for M. I have trouble sitting with my own, even though I know it's important. Given my health scares and other worries (including whether I need to go back to work to rebuild savings), I am not a huge reservoir of inner calm at the moment.

In that way, M and I are alike. We're both subject to anxiety. I think his is more intense because his career has required (and permitted) so much attention and focus that he doesn't have the energy left to approach self-insight with the same level of commitment.

My difficulty in being in relationship to M, as it was with my Nmother, is that it's a literally nonstop job, to hold my calm when the verbal bulldozer's running at top speed, the bull is rampaging repetitively around the china shop (me being, unfortunately, the china at times), and the sheer forcefulness of his personality and verbal torrents (however positive the mantras he repeats repeats repeats)...

just
freaking
wear
me
out

I'll try. I really want things to work out.

He allows no silence. He never, ever stops pushing for what he wants. He repeats and repeats and repeats what he wants as though I didn't comprehend it the first 20 times he said it.

Instead of arguing with him, I find myself lately just going quiet. He notices. After talking about himself for 10-15 minutes straight when I first see him, he'll notice I'm not as responsive (umm-hmm, oh my golly, that must've been this or that, wow, etc.) as I used to be. And then he'll manage, "How was your day?" Once I get out what I did, what went well or didn't, then he immediately begins to tell me how to fix what didn't. He does respond fairly well to the direct statement, I don't need you to fix it, I just wanted to talk about it. So that's progress.

We'll see. I really do think your understanding of him and what he needs is huge. Just huge. And I appreciate it tremendously.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on September 29, 2019, 09:41:28 AM
Non-sequitor alert:

Lighter - that's a magnificent bit of knowing you shared there - and extremely helpful, even for me.

Hops: Holly is my "verbal bulldozer". (I'm so stealing that.) And the truth is, it kinda hurts, feels a little like a betrayal and it DOES make me doubt/question myself when the words are about me; how she's perceiving me (rightly or wrongly).

So, yes; I've done what Lighter described above and gotten a little more clarity about how I've left myself open for that and how much salt I need to add to it, when it comes at me.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on September 30, 2019, 11:02:16 AM
Exhausting evening with M.
Started with a neighborhood walk. M wants to hold my hand, always. I generally don't enjoy holding his hand while we walk because our strides are so out of sync. His is shorter and I've usually got my dog on the leash. She and I have walked together for years and are kind of tuned to each other. I let her sniff-stop sometimes but urge her on others; have learned how to keep moving with her enough for her to be enjoying it and me too. Mainly, though, holding hands with M is difficult because his movements are jerky and he constantly fiddles with my hand. He doesn't mean it to be irritating but it is. I feel like a human fidget spinner. (M mentioned once that he likely has ADHD, fwiw.)

So many times when we walk, if my back feels even a bit out of balance, I choose not to hold hands because in my experience, it results ultimately in a sore back. I explain that gently. He forgets. I also have been thinking a lot about being more relaxed and calm, since the stroke. Wearing the monitor again does keep that on my mind. This itchy thing glued to my chest. So what I was looking forward to was just walking peacefully, enjoying the air and light, talking about anything or hopefully for SOME of the time, not talking.

M talked nonstop. I wasn't very responsive. So he began "teasing." Nonstop nonsequitors, just filling the air with comments and aiming his attention at me nonstop until I felt again...badgered. I tried to follow what he was saying but he was saying a lot of nonsense. I wasn't angry or pissy but just wasn't in a bantering mood. So he escalated, began jabbering things that made no sense. He kept saying when I'd ask a question to try to follow it, "I'm just TEASING you! I'm only JOKING!" The walk wasn't fun. I read too much teasing as screened anger, and am sure it was.

Then we took the dog home and drove downtown to meet our friends for dinner and a movie. I felt tuned out, and the hold-my-hand expectation came on again. I said I wanted to not hold hands because it was so hot, and I felt sticky. He looked offended and argued about it. We're still walking, my back is tensing.

By dinner I was relieved to have other people to focus on. M tried to dominate the conversation and two of my friends would not take the bait. They kept talking and laughing but didn't make him the center of attention. He looked confused and I felt badly but also didn't feel like soothing him.

At the start of the movie I did something I starting doing months ago every time we see a movie. Leaned over and said to him in a tender way, "Although I won't be holding your hand during the movie, I love you and I'm glad to be here with you." During the film he kept looking over and over at my hands and arms. I wound up clamping them in my lap, sensing nonstop that he was ill at ease because we weren't touching. I tried to enjoy the movie, mostly did. He liked it too. Near the end he reached for my hand again but I was concentrating on following the dialogue so didn't take it. (Plus, I had told him I didn't want to.) He withdrew his hand looking hurt. (Wrote me later how much rejection hurts.)

On the way home tension just built. At my house he again did his new "test" -- plaintively, may I have a hug before the evening is over? (We had hugged when he arrived but I wasn't touching him during our walk.) I said of course you can. And I hugged him when we got to my place. Then the next test--may I escort you to your door? I said, as I had before, No thank you.

He writes me an email about how hurt he is and how rejected he feels and how there must be physical affection and on and on and on. I write back about how I just wanted to feel peaceful and relaxed and that it's something I'm working on within myself, etc etc. And that sometimes I'm very affectionate and playful and other times I'm just in a quieter mood, thinking my own thoughts, but it's not to reject him, it's just a variation of mood. That I'd like to be able to have that inner stillness in his company at times.

Long story shorter, we write emails and he seems to make my physical availability a referendum on being loved and he expresses many complaints about rejection when I'm not in that frame of mind.

I think, largely because of coaching here, I got across how I feel when he's criticizing my inadequate displays of affection, or letting him walk me to the door, etc etc. He acts almost like a crossing guard, with lots of "child instructions" like, Be careful! Okay, cross now. I'm sure it's well intentioned, cultural and formal as he was trained to do. For me, walking through the world for decades on my own, it's maddening to try to adjust to.

And beneath that is just his huge neediness. He said just don't make me feel you don't care. I explained that I don't MAKE him feel his emotions; he reacts to his own experiences in his own ways just as I do. And told him repeatedly that I love him, and I've just been in a quieter mood lately. I've been doing a lot of introspection since the stroke and I have told him repeatedly that I feel I need to relax more.

I wound up writing long emails last night and woke to another complaint about how hurt he is when I don't feel like being touched. I wrote him a long thing about how I love him very much but don't feel I can do the job of reassuring him adequately, but am very hopeful that in our couple counseling, we'll learn ways to talk about it and navigate it that will help us both get our needs met. And then I sent him a meditation from YouTube on feeling rejected by others. It ends with an image with big red letters that say: feeling rejected is not about love for the other person.

I've also asked if I could come over later today. I had promised him we'd meet and talk whenever we're having a hard time and I want to do it if he does.

Whew and whew. It's sad to me, because the other night at dinner we had a wonderful, peaceful conversation. M said he understood much better why I'd seemed more withdrawn lately, felt reconnected to me and now he was "grounded." But one evening when I'm not hugging, touching and laughing and he's completely unmoored again.

I do have to be strong in order to help him the way Lighter described. I think I managed that as best I could. But I'm also concerned that his resentment and habitual focus on getting me to make him feel better will just escalate. I'll find out later when I see him next. He may be getting angry but not want to own that.

Thanks for listening, y'all. I'm okay but shoulders are tense and I want to get my mind off him and be in the present, enjoy a quiet day, and relax. Hope it's possible.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on September 30, 2019, 01:21:32 PM
We're meeting Wednesday evening.
That's better, gives me a few days to focus (and I see my T tomorrow).
I'll ask her to help me prepare.

I've even thought of doing an abbreviated list that I wrote here -- the thing about the personal space/autonomy that I feel he violates. But I sense that'd be a bad idea. He told me as he pieced together things with his T today he felt more upset than ever.

I don't know if what feels threatening to me is "right" or fair but it struck me as an illuminating pattern.

Hops

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on September 30, 2019, 01:45:45 PM
Golly, Hops.  That update makes me tired for you, but also hopeful M will figure this thing out. 

He can grasp concepts!   That's HUGE.  He can find his center.

Sure it goes in and out of focus, but that's to be expected, particularly when he's under stress.  That's how these things go, IME.

When he's found ways to calm himself, he'll have more time and ability to choose his responses, rather than react to what he interprets as threats.  As he gets more consistent with calming himself, he'll have more choice.

Maybe he can help you choose a code word to gently remind him when he's losing the thread that's meant to bind the two of you?  Maybe he'll need to be looked gently in the eye, and touched on the arm, or some physical connection, but reminded he's off track,  still loved, and accepted for who he is.  His default settings will be difficult to change, but change them he must.
   

You guys are swinging back and forth.  Your need for space sends him into a spin, so he closes the distance, and clutches physically ONTO your person, which sends you spinning, so you pull farther away, and he gets needier.  This isn't working, we all agree. 

I've been the runner, and the clutcher.  They both come from very deep place inside, IME.

I'm hoping this T can help you walk in each other's shoes. Relationships are hard work. Why would we ever assume they're less work than any project worthy of completion.  They all take time, and energy.  This will get harder, but then easier.  New habits will be understood, digested, and worked on till eventually cemented in place, IME.  Think in terms of 3 months to effect lasting change if M is really working with you.  Try to conjure up the things you like about M when you're most challenged.

The T should give you guys a workable framework to DO this work...  I hope.

I'd consider asking M for permission to forward your shared e mails to the T as background before the first appointment.  It will also be more productive, IMO, than M blathering on in the first session with his POV, which you have to listen to. 

 Maybe set a 2 hour appointment that first time.  You each get 30 minutes alone, then an hour together?  Or not?  Make sure there's a little noise machine outside the door.  You should be very honest, and get to the heart... I think.  I don't really know, but I see it a certain way, and I share: )


I admit, I'm working on issues with anger and sadness over a confusing relationship in my life right now.  I've spent months being puzzled by my huge overreactions to something I shouldn't be angry about.  I'm tracing my anger and sadness back to older wounds, (and some codependence) and it's helping me discharge the anger, and process that sadness.  I'm not through, but I'm honestly relieved, today, to have just gotten started.  For months I'd ask myself why this THING was SO EMOTIONALLY CHARGED FOR ME????!!!??  I had to take up pen, and paper and write it out, then attend to the feelings in my body, and follow them up to where they originated. 

I still have to "talk" with my friend, but at least I'm feeling better in my body... not huge feelings overwhelming me. Once I distill it down, understand it better myself, I'll share it with the friend, then steel myself for her truth.  Relationships are hard work.

  I guess that's where you guys are now. 

I'm breathing for you, Hops. You remember to breathe too.

It'll be OK.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on September 30, 2019, 02:15:04 PM
Thanks, Lighter.
I offered him a lot of reassurance via email and repeated I'm ready for The Work. Reminded him of what you said (or maybe that was Tupp) -- that couples who do this hard work together can wind up stronger and more bonded. He replied he felt much better than he knows I'm ready to engage and am not withdrawing. So that's good.

I think one day at a time. I don't think I'll try to structure the couples counseling but let the professional guide us in whatever system their experience tells them works. And hope for the best result. We're a bit away from that as we don't have our first appointments for a while. Hanging in, meanwhile.

I'm sorry you're bumping into a painful thing that's not quite resolved in your life. But very impressed with how clearly you're looking at it, and taking tools out of the toolbox that's been so useful to you, to use while navigating through it.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on September 30, 2019, 02:38:25 PM
Hops:

I can picture you exchanging private grins with M, after the hard work is done.  When comfortable knowing has replaced limbic chaos.

I'm glad I'm utilizing my toolbox too.  It's not easy to do when I'm struggling, and that's when I need it most.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: CB123 on September 30, 2019, 08:12:41 PM
Hops,

I'm so sorry what you are going through with you fella. I want so badly to be reassuring: "stick with it!", "with work you will get through it!", but I have been through too much and this is much to familiar. I don't see as much romance as a battle for boundaries and it's possible that he has been in this place before, thus the desperation. 

I was kinda horrified at some of the stuff he was saying about physical touch, and his trying to commandeer you as you walk, and the conversation later.  If you had written a script of my marriage, I don't think you could have done it better--right down to the insistence on holding hands while walking even though the gaits don't match and the tension that ensues, and the battle of wills after.

I am not able to hold onto hope for you in this relationship, but if there is anything I can give to support and encourage you, I surely will.

Please be careful, dear Hops. You are such a special person and you know you mean the world to me.

CB

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on September 30, 2019, 10:08:33 PM
Thanks, Lighter. I can so easily join the fantasy about the future private grins. I just don't know...every time I rely on my imagination, I lead myself astray.

CB, thank you. What you said is very sobering, but I'm glad of it. I don't know how to tease out the difference between M and your ex but I trust you profoundly, so what echoed for you, echoed.

I had a funny reaction in part, which was: CB just strengthened my spine.

Then another, which I'm not freaked about but is real: I have nobody else; I want it to work.

I think those things will be circling and circling until I figure out whether spine plus need can coexisit, without me devolving into a puddle of fear-of-stroke and all the old fears I've tended for too long.

I will try to remain honest with myself and with him. And we'll see whether together, we can grow.

I honestly don't know yet. We're in our eighth month, and both dragging age-70 accumulations of baggage.

I'd like to be open to the possibility that there's hope. But I do have a desire for reality above all. And then, there's a sense of vulnerability I didn't have 10 or 20 years ago.

I have a lot to learn.

Thank you.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on October 01, 2019, 09:43:10 AM
So now I'm a bit depressed.

I can feel myself sinking a little into an emotional place
of mistrust of M. I don't really want to do that. And I'm
not 100% sure he's earned it.

What saddens me is how dislike, in moments, can pollute
a whole happy thing.

So I'd like to ask myself (and my T) how to look at these
things in perspective. I hope she can help; at times she's
seemed discouraging about the relationship.

Good news is I'd forgotten how soon our first couples counselor
appt was coming up...it's tomorrow.

I may just be feeling discouraged but exaggerating the signficiance
of that. I need more emotional resilience to make good decisions.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on October 01, 2019, 11:40:48 AM
Hops, my thoughts, for what it's worth - I think it's very difficult to filter out different types of behaviour and reactions, on both sides, whether in a new relationship or an old one.  We all have things that are good for us, bad for us, things we can live with and things we can't.  We all have things that are reasonable or unreasonable to us, that are all influenced by our previous experiences and our expectations, I think, as well as our fears for the future.

So I think it's perfectly normal for you to be feeling the way you do and see sawing back and forth over M, and it's very good that you are being open and honest about them, with yourself, most importantly.  Your fear over spending your later years alone and on a low income is a very valid and sadly only too real one, that many people share and understand.  I think it's particularly hard when you've spent many years in difficult or unequal relationships, then a long time working on yourself and then you kind of look up and the picture in front of you doesn't always look very rosy.  It's good to be positive, but also necessary to be realistic, I think, so I think your need to get this right is a very real and valid one and I can understand how you feel very much.

I really felt for you over the 'walking out of sync' thing.  I have had times when I'm out with son and a friend.  Son will walk, holding me arm.  I'm pushing his wheelchair, empty at that point, because he may need it as the day goes on.  Friend is walking alongside me, chatting away, oblivious to my balancing act of son on my arm and chair handling, and the effort of juggling those things whilst trying to keep up with the conversation is very tiring, so I completely understood your feelings about the hand holding incident.  I did wonder if his T has told him to ask, "Can I walk you to the door, can we hug?" as a way of confirming it's okay?  It sounded to me like one of those clunky things people start practising when they first go to therapy.  It will be interesting to see how the session goes when you are both talking about the same topic at the same time.

I suppose what comes across as the biggest challenge (from an outsiders perspective) is that you are used to managing and analysing your own emotions, whereas it seems M is used to other people managing them for him.  But perhaps that will be something that comes out in the couples session and will start to improve. 

I think you are looking at things in perspective.  I haven't read anything that's made me think you're over-reacting.  You seem to be looking at things calmly and objectively, and giving yourself time and space when you need it.  I think that's good.  I think you can mistrust him for a bit without letting on to anyone and it's okay - it will probably pass and you'll have a clearer idea.  I think the couples session will probably give you a better idea; it will be interesting to see what happens when someone else is making suggestions and asking questions and giving you both time to respond :)  I hope it goes well xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on October 01, 2019, 02:52:21 PM
Hops:

You aren't assuming anything.

You're seeing a T with M to determine what's real, and what's not.

Maybe he can learn, and maybe he can't. 

You won't know until you get curious, drop expectation, and  employ your As.

Assess
Accept
Act

All in due time, and this is due diligence.

I'm curious, have you ever though M is PD?

I haven't felt that,  but now that CB is alarmed, it seems you might?

This next leg of the journey begins tomorrow.

Keep yourself safe, trust your instincts, and honor self-care.  Maybe keep a journal.  Practice your lean, and see if your intuition is correct. 
Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on October 02, 2019, 10:54:19 AM
So far, I've held my piece on this last description. Part of it is due to the crazy stuff I'm going through here; and part of it is because while I want to support you Hops, and give you a giant hug... I truly think that in a relationship with someone, some people rely too heavily on other people's advice and are even pushed off balance by other's experiences and fears.

I know I tend to relate my personal experiences to what other people are going through a lot. And I s'pose that's natural. (I'm trying to get past being hyper-sensitive to the verbal onslaught about me, from Hol. It takes a toll, even when I do have my feet firmly back in my center again.)

The neediness of M, can be overwhelming to someone who needs more space to process thoughts, emotions, and just the she said/he said. It's good he's able to express that he's feeling your need for space as a rejection... now, how can he learn that it's not? Can he simply strengthen himself enough that it's perfectly OK to not hear from you for a couple days? Take care of himself? So, this is communication. It's also some of the reason the relationship WORKS, even though you've experienced a bit of opposite needs and timing.

Can you find some small way to reassure him that a temporary need for space and quiet, isn't a threat to the relationship?

I'm asking a lot of questions over on this side of the state line too. About all the relationships I'm involved in presently. Just listening for my own answers first; before I ask the people in question for their answers.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on October 02, 2019, 04:00:28 PM
Thanks so VERY much all-a y'all. I am soooo grateful for your input. Doesn't matter if every thought is magically on point or not, because when I read I know I have FRIENDS, REAL FRIENDS who care enough to share a point of view on my detailed, repetitive internal stuff. And external. Thank you.

Tupp, I felt really comforted by your post, and your reassurance that I'm not processing or thinking anything wildly out of bounds or irrational as I look at my situation. That really mattered and helps me feel more confident to face some of this stuff. I think sometimes that when a struggle has been long, exhausting and also under the umbrella of economic fear and without family, it is a little different. That you understand that part, without judgement, is a piece of reality that I appreciate a lot. And you're not blind to the draw of love and being loved, either. It's a balance. M wants security too, as he doesn't want to be without a loving companion. I'd like us to create it for each other.

Lighter, again your perception of what he is most likely to be feeling, and where he may be in his own emotional development, is quite amazing. I wonder if given some of what you've been through, your necessary vigilance encompassed an incredible amount of close, daily, really radar-like observation. It's as though you understand male energies in a very profound way. I think you have a (very expensive) PhD in it. Luckily for me, you are able now to see those male energies compassionately too, without the fear. I can't describe how much I'm benefiting from this. So far, I don't find myself thinking he has a personality disorder, fortunately.

Amber, you're spot on. We really do need to figure out "codes" for letting each other know what we need. And you're right I can be impacted by others' experiences too, but I understand that. I also identify really tightly with different pieces of different stories, but I think I'm okay in generally sorting that out. When I catch it, I'll cop to it. (Usually later than is useful, but I'll get there). Thanks for your simple common sense, that the key issue is to teach M (but more importantly, that he teach himself, which may take a while) that absence doesn't mean disappearance, just means "not here or not available" right now. I think you and Lighter both are reminding me that if I deal with my own anxiety effectively, I'll be in better shape to offer him reassurance.

My own T is pretty connected to my feelings about boundaries and violations and all that. Perhaps even too much so. So that brings me to our first couples-T we met with today.

She was lovely. Very smart, very good at guiding us back and forth. I wanted M to go first and he talked so long (surprise!) that I was anxious about having time to get out my own story. But it did work. I listened in silence to his whole story about his backstory and his take on us. He talked often about "we" this and that, which she picked up on and guided him back gracefully to speaking for himself. During my turn, I was surprised how much I said about how I feel and how openly and also, how painful it was to do so.

In a nutshell, I talked about loving M for his big personality and also feeling engulfed by it.

Here's one thing I noticed and feel odd about. There's a lot of cultural stuff going on between M and me. I think she is also from Latin America, if I got her accent right. And she is more feminine than I feel I am. So I got a little worried about how she thinks about feisty-feminist American women. I also got in touch with how VERY fierce I am about protecting my personal space and choices and how much M challenges that at times. I identified that I might feel OVER-fierce sometimes. One huge thing she pointed out when I described my two marriages was, "You've never had the experience of being intimate with a non-abusive man." Huh. I then told her about the big exception, my lovely gentle father, and she said that my first bond with a male being him boded very well. And that helped me reconnect with M's nurturing side. That is real...even though the flip side feels overbearing.

We both got to share a lot that made a lot of sense. And she was very skilled. We have another person to see in about a week before we decide who we're going to work with. I felt vulnerable and drained afterward and M was joyful, very optimistic.

On balance, I feel better too. I think counseling together is essential and will take a while. And that's okay. I do believe it's an investment of time and effort that is worth it. I reconnected with loving M.

Your next weather report will probably be late tonight!

I love y'all. Truly.

Gratefully,
Hops

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on October 02, 2019, 09:21:05 PM
Damn Hops -- that's a lot of WHEW! Going to take a while for my slow brain to process. But on balance, it's sounds GOOD.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on October 02, 2019, 09:35:06 PM
Thanks, ((((Amber)))). I'm feeling good too.
A lot of tension emptied in that session.

Lovely dinner with M. He's still his repeating self...
but very tender and urgent and sincere, I believe.
And I felt less defensive.

You'll like our first code. She (M thinks Eastern European,
not Hispanic) suggested Silencio! He liked it, so now I get
to say that whenever his talking barrage is flooding me.

FUN. I have a power word!

Hugs
Hops

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on October 02, 2019, 11:22:50 PM
PS to Lighter (from Farm Life)--
I think understanding what ruminating is, is tremendously important for all of us. I'm glad you pulled out that word.

Thanks,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on October 03, 2019, 06:36:36 AM
I'm relieved to read about the T too, Hops. It's an amazing gift to speak without fear, and it's a miracle when we FEEL understood.  Actually BEING understood is whole'nuther level of miracle, IME.

Even if it's the T who gets you.  There's great hope she can help M understand as well. 

About code words... my mother used to say "LV" to the girls when they were little, and in public.  It meant "little voices."  Sometimes the girls and I use it with each other,  still.  There's a different kind of energy to original code, I think.  It's always used in a very gentle way, as reminder, not judgment. 

It has to be something you can use in front of his peeps, kwim?

::thinking::.

Was "silencio!" a joke?

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on October 03, 2019, 11:06:08 AM
It was his lighthearted choice of a good code to use with him when I feel overwhelmed by his talking nonstop and need some quiet. She supported it because having him choose it, and seeing him respond with a smile, meant it would be a good one to use.

I resisted a bit at first, since I'd rather say something in my own language, but agreed to try it. No harm. And her inviting him to choose it was a savvy way to have him buy in to the idea.

M is completely bilingual, speaks and teaches in both English and Spanish.

(I do need to ask this T why, when I had some reaction to something--I don't remember what--she mentioned I had a "snotty" look. I didn't really like that but was too startled to say anything.)

Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on October 03, 2019, 01:44:38 PM
Hops:

I misunderstood the silencio thing... .thought it was the T who liked it.  Sorry. 

I do think that's cute, but only between you and M.  In mixed company, I doubt he'll share that smile in the same way, when he's struggling, IMO.

About your "snotty" look.  I've been paying attention to my facial expressions late, with one person in particular, and I have a flash of emotion take over my expression that I was completely surprised by. 

Don't get defensive.  Try to pay attention to your expression, as a matter of curiosity, and see what you catch.  Sometimes our faced DO things we're not aware of, IME.  I think I'd want to provide clarity, certainly AND at the same time I think it sucks that women are judged "bitchy" every time we have a less than happy emotion cross our faces.  During the trials I was in trouble for it all
the
time. Even with my own team of advocates.  My frustration at the injustice.  At the crazy made up stories.  At my distress, coming out of my nervous system but having to PERFORM in public all the time, with everyone judging me.  I just honestly had to be made aware of what my face and demeanor WAS so I could stop sabotaging myself in that way.  I find men and women punish us for looking generally bitchy, as defined in this culture.  It can be fear, distress, frustration, ongoing abuse and voicelessness and it's judged the same way, which is FRUSTRATING too, IME. 

I love that M bought into the concept of code word.  I think that's wise, and smart, and necessary.  Good on'ya and T to gain his compliance.  That's half the battle, I think.  Staying engaged, and drive to learn is the next part. 

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on October 03, 2019, 02:00:32 PM
I'm totally into RBF, but inasmuch as I couldn't SEE my own face at the moment, I think it was odd of the T to make a judgey comment like that.

It is my only hesitation about choosing her. Sometimes something like that hints at underlying bias. Who knows? She may not like women who express themselves strongly, or have unconscious anti-women bias. Many many women do. Or it may just have been a poor choice of words. I think it was.

Overall though, I did like her and found her skillful. We'll see. We're meeting with another one in a couple weeks and I appreciate the chance to make choices. Not just go with the first meeting, which was still cathartic and helpful.

I've just been on the receiving end of bad counseling a couple times in my life, so I'm cautious. She may be the right one, or not. I'm actually going to ask her about that comment and explain to her why I didn't like it, and just see what she says. To avoid dragging M into it, I might just call and leave that concern on her voicemail, and see if she responds. I will share with M that I'm doing that, in case she pulls the "we have to have another full session before you say anything more..." thing.

Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on October 03, 2019, 03:48:22 PM
ACK bad Ts!  That is SO TRUE, Hops.

I think you should ask this T about her comment, when M's not listening.

Once a Doc was sending me messages, via her face, regarding youngest dd, and it drove me nuts till I told her I was overtly concerned about what those faces MIGHT MEAN.  She wasn't even aware she was doing that, and said she didn't mean to set off alarm bells.

Ask.  You might find yourself surprised by the answer.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on October 04, 2019, 06:56:43 AM
I'm actually going to ask

Yup. That's my plan.

Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on October 04, 2019, 11:10:25 AM
Boy, do I have to keep a grip on my imagination (and my fears).

Called the T, explained to her that I'd liked her a lot, but one moment had troubled me: when there was some dialogue and I'd had a facial reaction to something M said and she said something to the effect of: I see a look on your face...snotty. I told her I was startled by it and it had stuck with me, and wondered if I'd misunderstood.

She remembered it clearly and said that right after her observation, I'd said: Sometimes I have an edge, and I want to work on that. (True.) She also apologized for using an offensive descriptor, and said it was her challenge -- she uses the wrong word sometimes because English isn't her first language. (She's from Switzerland, grew up with German and French and Italian).

I found all that a fair and transparent explanation, accepted her apology, and feel better. It's hard for me to trust, and there's nobody more important to trust than a T. But I think her explanation was honest and reasonable. So if after we interview one or two others, M prefers her, I could work with her too. Maybe a shred of worry (paranoia?) that she might dislike me, but I don't think it's true.

Our next T-interview is with a Sikh, male. M is pleased that we can have any choice from a different culture. I think me going along with that, if I feel comfortable with that potential-T, is a good idea. Because some of the tensions between us are about cultural differences, as well as our histories.

So there it is. A word. Dealt with. I could parse everything all day long but that'd take me away from obsessing over the news!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on October 04, 2019, 08:07:45 PM
I wonder if you'll like the Sikh T, Hops.

You have equal input in the selection. or something close?

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on October 04, 2019, 08:42:00 PM
Probably will like him. The Skih faith has scripted complete equality for men and women for a verrrrrrry long time. My friend, a local public servant until he retired, is Sikh. A lovely, radiant human being. Ailing now, sadly.

And of course. M and I will decide together. Never crossed my mind that would mean anything other than equal input; he's never expressed anything different, either.

Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on October 09, 2019, 11:01:33 AM
I'm glad M and I are going to do this counseling. Still waiting on second appointment, but the more I think about her, the more I sense it'll probably be the first person we saw. I like her. Talked over the whole weird-word incident with my own T and she seemed to feel good about how I described the couples-T. How she'd behaved during the session, how attuned she was to each of our behaviors, etc. That was reassuring.

I think it's going to be possible, whomever we see, for me to describe the impact of M's sort of overwhelming verbal and manic behavior on me, and how despite truly loving him, I also associate him with a lot of extra stress. I think he'll try to tone it down once I learn comfortable ways to assert my need for him to. He has reacted very well most of the time.

I'm feeling the need to get across to him how strongly I feel the need to reduce emotional stress, and ask him to be my ally and supporter in that. I have a heart issue and post-stroke stuff I'm still thinking and worrying about, and it'd help if he'd try to contribute calm. He thrives on nonstop stimulation and excitement but I know he has another channel, too. You can't write 17 books unless you know how to be still.

Anyhow, tonight we're doing dinner with friends and then a political event with a national journalist, in the renovated huge old cinema I went to as a child that always feels magical to me. I'm looking forward to it. (The place has the old-school lit-up marquee with a thousand lights. Grand interior. Sill love it.)

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on October 09, 2019, 12:20:04 PM
I'm very behind on posts, Hops, so just starting to catch up and I wondered, might you and M be able to sign up to some sort of relaxing/no talking type activity?  Yoga, tai chi, singing classes, a drumming group, just something that's known to bring stress levels down and where talking is just not part of what's on offer?  I wondered if it might be something you could try alongside the therapy sessions - it would mean you know you get at least an hour with M without him speaking :)  And I wondered if him getting into something that is more about how he feels on the inside rather than how he projects himself to other people (which I guess is what the constant talking is all about?) might just calm him down a bit and help him see he can be wonderful and lovely without needing to talk constantly :)

The T does sound good; I was a bit taken aback when you said she said you looked "snooty" (I'd have been offended by that!) but it's good that you were able to talk and see that she perhaps just didn't choose the right word (easy enough to do, even when using your first language, never mind your second).

The old cinema sounds amazing, have a lovely, lovely time :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on October 09, 2019, 01:28:09 PM
Thanks, Tupp.
I appreciate the idea as it's a good one.

I did mention doing meditation together at one point and he was receptive.
After he heard about my exercise class he joined, it became sort of his baby and I dropped out.

My great preference would be for him to learn and practice meditation on his own. He's so eager to do things with me that it becomes about that. And I would probably find his presence distracting.

We could try it at one of our homes a couple times, with a recording or video, and see how it goes...

It's a good thought. And thank you for it! (Don't worry about being "behind" -- we're all up to our collarbones in life and it happens to all of us.)

Hugs,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on October 09, 2019, 03:37:09 PM
Hmmm...
silent couples activities.

Salt cave? 

Silent retreat?  I bet a silent retreat (very short one) would kick start the meditation routine.


As long as M is receptive, and positive, and participating.... it's all good: )
Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on October 10, 2019, 11:38:16 PM
Well, this is a different take, odd but kind of neat.

Remember how I've mentioned that M's restless hands drive me crazy, his fingers always twiddling and jumping so that it's unpleasant for me to hold hands with him?

Just on a hunch I ordered him one of these and loves the thing!
https://www.fidgetland.com

He had it with him at a recent event we went to and kept it busy the whole time and genuinely seems to benefit. He even mentioned to me that he "tries so hard" to remember not to grab my hand and the fiddler has helped. He laughs about it but I was surprised he actually had it on hand. And his little comment made me recognize that he really isn't being purposefully oblivious but actually struggles.

I think maybe he's had the hyperactive kind of ADD his whole life and never been helped at all with it. He also clearly has the hyper-focus part, which helps his career...and maybe some more ADD techniques will ease some of the manic behavior I find so challenging.

He's joked about it a lot but seems ironically delighted I got it for him.

Hops-a-D....D


Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on October 12, 2019, 04:51:08 AM
Well, this is a different take, odd but kind of neat.

Remember how I've mentioned that M's restless hands drive me crazy, his fingers always twiddling and jumping so that it's unpleasant for me to hold hands with him?

Just on a hunch I ordered him one of these and loves the thing!
https://www.fidgetland.com

He had it with him at a recent event we went to and kept it busy the whole time and genuinely seems to benefit. He even mentioned to me that he "tries so hard" to remember not to grab my hand and the fiddler has helped. He laughs about it but I was surprised he actually had it on hand. And his little comment made me recognize that he really isn't being purposefully oblivious but actually struggles.

I think maybe he's had the hyperactive kind of ADD his whole life and never been helped at all with it. He also clearly has the hyper-focus part, which helps his career...and maybe some more ADD techniques will ease some of the manic behavior I find so challenging.

He's joked about it a lot but seems ironically delighted I got it for him.

Hops-a-D....D

Hops my son used to leap around a lot when we were out walking - I used to put rocks in his backpack because it calmed his system down.  Perhaps you could try it with M :)  Lol, only kidding, the fidget thing sounds like a great idea.  It made me wonder if M (and you!) might benefit from an assessment with someone who specialises in sensory difficulties?  I don't know what you would call someone like that in the States; they are few and far between in the UK but virtually all of my son's problems are sensory in their origins and the advice we've had about ways to help calm his system and keep him level have been really helpful.  Just thought I would mention it in case it helps; I'm glad the fidget thing has helped and that he was happy you got it for him.  I guess it's a sign to him that you really want things to work and are trying to find ways to make that happen, which would make anyone happy :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on October 12, 2019, 11:18:36 AM
That's a really great thought, Tupp.  Sometimes we spend time focused on a problem, and can't see the forest for the trees.  Finding a cause seems like the logical place to start with any issue we're trying to solve,  IME.

Hops, what a wonderful gesture.  To offer a concrete act of care in your mission of support for the relationship, and M's struggle.

I'm a big fan of being proactive, particularly with childcare, and soothing ourselves in adulthood. 

I have things to occupy my hands when in public, traffic, in the house.... so does my sister.   

Some people bite their nails, fidget, etc.

We can be life learners if we're able to look honestly at what's working and what needs tweaked. 

I think M knows you're a tremendous asset and partner, Hops.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on October 12, 2019, 01:03:47 PM
Thanks, guys. You are so thoughtful and supportive, it blows my mind.

I think I won't explore new kinds of "treatment" or "evaluation" for M at this point, mainly because I've already got the poor man into two kinds of therapy -- his own T, and soon our couples T.

But gradually it might be useful to give him more info on ADHD (not that he couldn't look it up himself...). I generally don't want to direct his personal growth or visualize him as a project, but as long as he is this open and motivated, I can share comments and observations ... and fidget devices! If I mention those things, like sensory processing and ADHD a bit more...maybe he'll bring something up in his own work with his own T.

What's fascinating about M is his actual brilliance, and how that has driven a remarkable career. The couple-T we met on Monday asked him some astute questions, including who was the favorite (ie, "golden") child in your family? M immediately said, I was. And M spoke about the extreme privilege he grew up with.

He was the only one who broke away from the family expectation that he become a bigwig in one of the largest businesses in Central America. He went off to be a scholar and took that all the way to the top. He said his father once told him, You had the courage to do what I never could. And his sister said similar things.

One thing I love is that in both of these exploratory couple-T sessions, I've spoken very openly and descriptively about my observations and reactions to M, and painting his frustrating qualities vividly. And yet there is no blowback whatsoever from M afterward. He seems glad to hear what I actually think, and motivated to understand. He has immense learning capacity and never reacts negatively, even when I describe behaviors I think would be hard to hear about in front of a stranger.

So I'm feeling better about our prospects these days. He's coming over tonight for an indoor picnic and flick.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on October 13, 2019, 04:58:36 AM
Thanks, guys. You are so thoughtful and supportive, it blows my mind.

I think I won't explore new kinds of "treatment" or "evaluation" for M at this point, mainly because I've already got the poor man into two kinds of therapy -- his own T, and soon our couples T.

But gradually it might be useful to give him more info on ADHD (not that he couldn't look it up himself...). I generally don't want to direct his personal growth or visualize him as a project, but as long as he is this open and motivated, I can share comments and observations ... and fidget devices! If I mention those things, like sensory processing and ADHD a bit more...maybe he'll bring something up in his own work with his own T.

What's fascinating about M is his actual brilliance, and how that has driven a remarkable career. The couple-T we met on Monday asked him some astute questions, including who was the favorite (ie, "golden") child in your family? M immediately said, I was. And M spoke about the extreme privilege he grew up with.

He was the only one who broke away from the family expectation that he become a bigwig in one of the largest businesses in Central America. He went off to be a scholar and took that all the way to the top. He said his father once told him, You had the courage to do what I never could. And his sister said similar things.

One thing I love is that in both of these exploratory couple-T sessions, I've spoken very openly and descriptively about my observations and reactions to M, and painting his frustrating qualities vividly. And yet there is no blowback whatsoever from M afterward. He seems glad to hear what I actually think, and motivated to understand. He has immense learning capacity and never reacts negatively, even when I describe behaviors I think would be hard to hear about in front of a stranger.

So I'm feeling better about our prospects these days. He's coming over tonight for an indoor picnic and flick.

Hugs
Hops

I think you're wise not to force him into too many things, Hops, it is hard to find the line between helping and creating a project, as you say.  It's so lovely tor read that the sessions are going well (from the point of view that they aren't causing animosity between you afterwards).  The indoor picnic sounds lovely, I hope you both had a really good time :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on October 13, 2019, 11:44:08 AM
Hops:

How did the picnic go?  If anyone watched VICTORIA, there was a fireside picnic for the King and Queen after they were lost, then found by an Irish couple who took them in, not realizing who they were, fed them by the fire, and gave them their little peasant bed for night. 

When Victoria returned to England she had a little fireside picnic with Albert to bring back the simplicity, and joy of those moments
.
I hope yours was every inch as enchanting, Hops.  IMHO creating these kinds of memories is the best.

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on October 13, 2019, 08:33:43 PM
Picnic was lovely. We went over to my neighbor's to taste her beta batch of a new spicy chutney she'll be marketing through a local cidery. Yum. Then had our tapas and wine and wound up listening to my friend's CD...she is gone now (killed in an awful intentional accident by a homicidal/suicidal man escaping his murder of his gf, years ago now). But her extraordinary voice and talent remain and M just fell in love with her music.

Tonight we had a lovely dinner out and won't see each other until I arrive in SF a week from now. We have been so much more relaxed with each other since seeing those two potential couple-Ts, it's odd. I think we were stuck and needed that third party help...so we both seem much more peaceful and even more committed. Feeling very good about it all right now.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on October 14, 2019, 07:47:45 AM
Well....
your post started my mouth to watering. 
Chutney, and cider, and spicey, oh my: )

Then I was yanked sideways by the music piece, and loss of your lovely friend.  I find people want to deny and minimize violence in our culture, particularly for women and children, and then it's touching your life, infringing, engulfing, taking lives of people you know and love.  So frustrating, and in many cases avoidable, IME.  Some voices have no power in this culture.  Will you share your friend's voice with the board, Hops?

You sound relaxed, and comfortable right now.  It's nice to read you're finding your stride with M. 

Lighter





Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on October 14, 2019, 09:05:23 AM
I hope you enjoy San Fran, Hops. You might see things you don't so much enjoy, if the media reports are to be believed. (I remain Skeptical of everything I read these days. And I need a whole factory to separate out the scarce facts from opinions.)

I think you'll have a lovely adventure! I want one too.  :(  But I'm on hold for that now.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on October 14, 2019, 01:22:53 PM
Hi Lighter,
She was a much-beloved founding member of a well-known acoustic group that did very sophisticated, jazzy, bluegrassy folk. I knew her through another circle. We weren't the closest friends but I did invite her to co-create a service at my church that was pretty amazing. I did a sermon on loneliness and she did the music. Congregation was absolutely spellbound. Later she moved [away] to direct a large chorus that traveled the world. People from all over came for her service.

Her end was beyond tragic. He had just killed his gf and intentionally crossed the highway and drove headfirst into her car (to take himself out, they think). And so, took her life as well. She had just come back for a meeting about possibly reuniting with the original group and was on her way to town in her rental car.

Her voice will be around forever; she was much loved and respected and recordings remain. Some aren't easy to find though. Her best album was called _______. Extraordinary.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on October 14, 2019, 04:25:49 PM
Thanks, Amber. I love SF. Worked in Silicon Valley and spent a good bit of time there.
I know social problems have worsened but I'm not shocked. Just sad to see.

There's transparency there...when all the neglect and sorrow are visible in the open.
I'm more comfortable with that sad ugliness than with ghettos and gated enclaves
that protect us from seeing what legacy inequalities, indifference to mental illness
and the results of abuse, and viewing many human beings as discardable has done.

Happy for the tech-wealthy who are so enjoying one of the most magical and
beautiful places in the country. Too bad about everyone else, who can't afford to
keep living there any more. And not because they don't work hard.

Luckily for M's sons, they are successful and well off, in a lovely town about an
hour from SF. All the best of the Bay and Sonoma, none of the rest. I'm genuinely
happy for them and looking forward to exploring that lovely area with M.

But mostly, to cradling a new baby girl I may be lucky enough to love and know
for years to come!

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on October 14, 2019, 06:08:51 PM
 BABY!

I so want to cradle that baby girl too, Hops.

Enjoy: )

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on October 15, 2019, 06:16:18 PM
OOOOOOO babies are SO wonderful. I spend time just looking at them, while holding them, wondering what kind of person they'll choose to be. And giving that unconditional attention and gentleness... that let's 'em know whatever they choose is A-OK.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on October 27, 2019, 09:07:13 AM
Home at last, sick as a dawg, but happy I went!

Will catch up and also fill y'all in asap...but it'll be
a few days before I feel I can write coherently.

What is it about airplanes?????

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on October 27, 2019, 09:52:38 AM
My theory is some evil mad scientist designed airplanes as the perfect incubator for viruses and bacterial infections Hops. Moooooooahahahahaha....     :D


Feel better soon!
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on October 27, 2019, 05:25:21 PM
The cabin pressure. 
Sitting stationary for hours. 
Re breathing everyone's gases, and bathroom air... bleck.

Not to mention dehydration, and how difficult it is to NOT touch our faces with our hands..... all those surfaces touched by SO MANY PEOPLE. 

The salty processed snacks in airports, and on planes don't help, IME.

The mistake of having an alcoholic beverage, or two, further dehydrating us, and feeding everything terrible in the body with sugar and carbs.

Poor sleep from travel. 

Upset systems from travel.... is it just me, or does everyone have trouble going to the bathroom when far from home?  I think it's most people.  The toxins build up, we feel bloated, and are even less likely to stay on top of clean water intake, IME.  If we're drinking more alcohol AND eating food that aren't great for us, it shows up after a day of travel for me. 

I often make really bad food choices when traveling under stressful circumstances.   

Feel better, Hops. I want to hear everything: )

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on October 28, 2019, 07:34:06 PM
I didn't eat bad food and drank no alcohol...tons of water tomato juice...I figure I picked up the virus on the first flight and it flowered after a few days. I only wish I hadn't held little V (2 weeks old) for an hour the night before I got symptoms! But all reports since have said she's fine. CB, I might actually try a mask. And Lighter, the surfaces thing...that is so true. Planes are definitely not sanitized, so every tray table, light or air or call button or seatbelt buckle or bathroom handle...all must be freaking petri dishes. Yikers. Maybe another trip I'll take along some disinfectant wipes and get serious about trying to reduce that vulnerability. How to avoid touching face, when putting glasses on and off much less blowing nose over 8 hours...hard one. But I'll try to do something! We've got Costa Rica for the holidays and Spain in spring and maybe a return trip to CA in March. I need to survive!

The good stuff. This part of M's family is LOVELY. The sons are brilliant, sensitive, kind. The DILs are kind, also very smart (didn't have as much time) and so welcoming. The kids (two boys 6 and 2, plus new little girl) are amazing. Older boy and I hit it off and little guy was so cute. Liked playing games and dragging me down the sidewalk to see a "tractor" (fork lift). I can imagine many happy times ahead feeling grandma-ish! As to the newborn, In Love. Since the dad wasn't able to contribute (childhood illness made him sterile) they used donor sperm and Mom egg. They chose based on qualities (science and art genes) they liked...and she's African American plus several other interesting ethnicities I can't recall. Beautiful, strong looking baby. Big feet and long fingers, so she'll be an Olympic swimmer-concert pianist, of course. I felt very happy being among them all. They explicitly welcomed me, the oldest said "I'm glad you're part of our family" and I just melted. So much fun. They seemed also to enjoy me rolling my eyes at M at times, with shared grins.

One of the DILs sent me home-made elderberry syrup to help fight the cold. A son sent me a pomegranate from his front yard. I spent the last two days lolling about at the hotel, which was quirky and fun if not super comfy. I called it "The Hotel Where Old People Go to Hurt Themselves" because it was tall on charm and eccentric decor but short on practicality. Lovely old renovated Victorian with three spiffed-up Airstreams out back in a cute garden. I got them to fetch me an actual reading lamp. M said every time he showered he was anxious. Cute clawfoot tubs with a curved bottom and no grab bars. So we'll stay somewhere more conventional next time but I wouldn't mind staying there again. Nice breakfasts and interesting people around.

Feeling much better today and having dinner with M Wednesday. He brought groceries because as usual, I had no staples, and friends have been in touch to hear about the trip. Will be seeing several later in the week.

Have my stroke followup appt with a neurologist tomorrow afternoon. Fingers crossed. Almost cancelled it but then figured I might have to wait months if I rescheduled. So I'll go cough at her.

I am so far behind on your posts and that'll be my favorite thing tomorrow.

love to all,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on October 29, 2019, 04:34:13 PM
[Shifted health stuff over to the Health Updates thread...]

Newish relationship news:
M and I really do travel well together. That's a delight.

Now he's asking if I'll go to Buenos Aires next August. My first impulse was jeez, gotta slow down. (And, I was sick on the way home for the second time.) But, I'm starting to rebound with a sense of adventure. This is just craaaaaaaaaaaaaaazy. If we keep it up, it's a LOT more than I'm used to. I hadn't been across the pond or out of the country (one business trip to Canada excepted) since '75.

Since I met M nine months ago, the travel picture has been:
Paris last summer
California just now
Costa Rica in Dec-Jan
[he also suggested London in June, I demurred but could change my mind]
Spain/Portugal in April
now, maybe, Buenos Aires in August

This feels normal to him (he gets paid trips paid because he a visiting lecturer, pays for my room and food and sometimes flight, if he forgets to use his FF miles)... but it's WACKY to me. And the dog/house-sitter is nibbling away at my anemic emergency fund.

Trying to get my head around all this jet setting. Speaking of which, carbon offsets don't do it, so there's the climate warming guilt.

Other R thing. I'm still trying to figure out whether M's constant talking is just an insecurity tic or is narcissistic. I'm spooked about the latter because my mother did that constantly and it cost me too much, and because of her I'm so well-groomed to fall in love with sparkly, self absorbed people. He behaves adoringly and then I notice that there is SO much I-I-I in his monologues, how rarely he actually tunes into me and how poorly he listens.

We've barely starting couples counseling, though. I need to be brave enough to ask the N-questions there. And despite sometimes feeling that he wants me as a companion largely because I'm smart, offer him good banter and good company...and he feels better about himself having an "attractive"  woman....I also think in his own way he does love me.

It's a big conundrum and I have a fair amount of paranoia about it. So our work ain't done. He keeps proposing and I keep putting on the brakes. I just tell him, we have our work to do, still, first....

Just rambles. Thanks for listening to them.

love
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on October 30, 2019, 02:10:16 PM
Will unpack and respond to this lovely update, Hops.  So g l ad you had a good trip.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on October 31, 2019, 04:07:52 AM
The trip sounds amazing, Hops.  I'm so glad M's family were so welcoming and made you feel so at home.  I'm sorry you picked up a bug, though!  I hope that clears up soon and doesn't leave you too wiped out.

The travel plans sound amazing and a jet set life style has its appeal.  I get what you're saying about the jet lag, health problems, dog sitter costs and carbon guilt, though.  It's difficult to find a balance between making the most of opportunities and not leaving yourself skint and worn out in the process.  So I hope there's a mid point you can find because traveling around a bit sounds lovely.

The insecurity/anxiety/narcissism bit is a difficult one.  I'm glad you've got T's, both alone and together to guide you through it.  I do wonder about the boundaries between various neurological conditions and personality and/or mental health problems.  I've been thinking about my own mum and wondering that if she is an undiagnosed autistic, possibly born to another undiagnosed autistic, parenting possibly two undiagnosed autistics - in a world where autism was still misunderstood and almost undetected in women - if the experience of not being heard, seen, accepted as she is or was triggered the other stuff that happened over the years.  So I do wonder how many of these things overlap and intertwine.  All of that is theoretical, though.  I think, in practical terms, what matters, is whether those 'dodgy' bits are things we can cope with and that don't harm us?  And I guess that is different for each of us.  Our experiences from family members can make us more sensitive, which can be good or bad, depending on which way you look at it :)  But you are a smart cookie and you have good professional help, plus M does seem genuinely interested in working on the relationship with you (I kind of think an N would be blaming you for the situation and not accepting they might have a part to play?  He seems to be willing to accept he might need to change a bit to keep your fire burning :) ).  I hope you can find a way through, whichever way it might be.  I am looking forward to catching upon all the other threads :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on November 01, 2019, 03:27:24 PM
Thanks very much, Tupp. Insightful and on-point as ever.
I really appreciate what you said here:

Quote
M does seem genuinely interested in working on the relationship with you (I kind of think an N would be blaming you for the situation and not accepting they might have a part to play?  He seems to be willing to accept he might need to change a bit to keep your fire burning :)

You're right about all this. I think it's why I'm still with him, when I've ended other relationships over less. The sweet, good, core of M keeps showing me over and over that this is very real and sincere to him, and that beside whatever less-romantic motives he may have, M really does value me deeply. We may have somewhat different notions of love but I believe we're offering each other our realest selves to the degree we can access them. I think his anxiety, over-proving, over-talking, over-persuading behavior is just a lifelong drive he's had to prove himself, for core family issues he's never really unpacked. Including being a golden child in a wealthy family parented more by servants, though he maintains great love for his parents. He's still compensating for something. But his playful, open and exuberant nature, plus the brilliance, are wonderful qualities to be around.

Whew. I'm just very grateful that he is so open and willing to do "whatever it takes" for our relationship. Maybe it's because I seem like a last major goal to him. Maybe it's because his brief months as a widower overwhelmed him (lot of silence). Maybe it's because all the ways we DO "get: each other are as remarkable to him as he declares they are. Or I'm cute and purty and witty. Or something.

I do love him. I just don't believe love is all you need. We're doing the work, and I think what's hard for him is the pace. He'd like to rush from episodes of intense happiness directly to GOAL. Buy the house get married and it's ANCHORED. I think he views me as an anchor he's desperate not to lose. I don't want to lose him either. I think going back to life and my image of old age before I met him could be very bleak. But I've got a deep determination to build a foundation that is real and not fantasy based.

BTW, I was relieved when he found out that Buenos Aires would be too close to the start of the academic year. Enough trips in the quiver for me....

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on November 01, 2019, 06:07:22 PM
It is good that he's open to working on things, Hops, and I'm so happy to hear that the lovely bits about him are still very much evident (I think if it was show to woo you in the early days it would be fading by now).  He does sound like a caring person and yep, I can see that he may have had to prove himself endlessly throughout his life and it's deeply ingrained in him now.  And I think you're right; you do need more than love and a real foundation rather than a picture of what you hope it might be like (as you mentioned on the other thread about visualising relationships and then being crushed when they don't work out).  Real and imperfect as opposed to pretend and endlessly wonderful :)  I'm am keeping all fingers crossed that things continue to work out for you :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on November 02, 2019, 11:08:27 AM
Hops:

I think travel is very stressful, IME. 

It's a testament to how well you and M are doing that you not only enjoyed each other very much, but you also enjoyed meeting his family, and forming new attachments.

I think M truly does love and value you as a companion, and partner.  He cares what you think and feel.  He wants to come to a place where you're both happy, and he seems to be working very hard to that end.

I'm very happy for you both.

Hope you feel better soon.

Lighter   
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on November 09, 2019, 02:03:27 PM
How're you feeling Hops? Over the bug?

What happening with you & M? Still smooth sailing? Starting to relax with and into each other yet?
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on November 09, 2019, 03:26:05 PM
You're right, Tupp:
Quote
Real and imperfect as opposed to pretend and endlessly wonderful
That's exactly it. When I talked to him about "building the foundation" he was very receptive. I think a lot of tension has evaporated recently because of two things:
--I haven't budged and he's still wonderful
--We've shelved-for-now one struggle we were having (his panic over sexual intimacy because of his surgery, which I had compassion for but was ultimately unable to relax with because he over-ran me in a very vulnerable state like a bulldozer in his anxiety, so he gets to work on that for now with his own T...unless later we try again, which I'm sure we will)
--He's more than willing to do couples-T. I have a feeling we'll see big benefits rather quickly. The relief we both felt after even the preliminary sessions was clear.

Lighter, you're right. I believe he genuinely loves me too. It's been nine months and my trust in him and his intentions has increased a lot. He IS working at it. I'm not as much. But I think that's the real situation and I'm okay with that. When I do have to dig deep, I will. But for now I'm holding some information and questions for couples-T. M still has a lot to do about learning to listen. Meanwhile, we play well together and always enjoy each other's company. I was in a sad/bad mood the other day and told him I ought not to expose him, had nothing to do with us...and he called and so sweetly told me to come over no matter what mood I was in, he loved me as I am, I could not listen to him, and we'd put on great music, and I went and he was just lovely and my bad mood turned happy. This appears to be what being loved feels like! He wasn't (for a change) being controlling, just kind.

Skep, bug is 90% gone, though this cold snap won't help.

We are definitely beginning to relax together more. We are truly a "WE." The trip and the family happies was significant (and Costa Rica for the others will be a big deal too -- verrrrry different from the young California families). CR is where all the headstones and generations of Big Deal Family History and Upper Social Strata Hyper-Wealth stuff is concentrated. I am un-intimidated (ancient history, but first boyfriend's family had similar resources) but very curious. I know his sister will be great. Turns out his industrialist brother is deeply evangelical (Central America crazytown style) and am glad I know that. I can handle folks of all sorts because I just go with kindness and warmth and usually all goes well. M is much loved, greatly admired, etc. in that place. I am curious to see how he manages all those ancient heavy vibes. I'm glad he hasn't sold his condo there yet so we'll have a peaceful place to retreat to. I'm packing light and basically bringing myself. As is.

We are enjoying each other much more now. Decided to keep Tgiving simple (he had been talking about cooking and hosting and I said I'd sous-chef but generally have downplayed and detached from holidays for a decade). So we're going to a potluck at my church, a place he's curious about but hasn't explored, which he thinks will be interesting.

ONE thing I'm clear about with M is that he has NOOOOOO tolerance for boredom and to be happy requires steady stimulation. I don't feel obliged to entertain him (although evidently I often do, since our conversations are very lively) ... but this strikes me as the perfect way to avoid stress and keep his brain busy!

Should be good. And thanks for checking in about us.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on November 14, 2019, 01:11:17 AM
A simple Thanksgiving sounds like the best kind, Hops.  I love simplicity, whichever form it takes.  I think there's something really warm about it - like it's the intention that matters, not how much money you spend or how fancy everything is.  I like that.

I do wonder if M has spent a lot of time around people who wanted or needed him to be in control - lead the conversation, make the decisions, tell everyone what to do.  Some lead and some follow.  I know there are times when I feel like everyone I know is waiting for me to tell them what to do and how to do it (and I used to as well, these days I tend not to).  I think it's amazing that he's willing to make attempts to keep things good between you.  What you said about him being so kind when you were in a bad mood was so sweet.  It all sounds very lovely :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on November 16, 2019, 07:59:18 AM
Me too, Tupp. I love simple entertaining, celebrating, etc. M has an affinity for formality, but that's fine. I know all the rules and tricks from being sous-chef and butler for so many of my parents' dinner parties (and Nmom's obsession with formal etiquette). If M wants to do those now and then, I can help and participate. But the rest of the time, just having friends stop by as they are is what makes me happiest.

I've noticed that we've socialized a ton with my friends, casually and easily. But M's friendships seem to be all based in colleague relationships. I do think they're his friends, but there's a level of professors-at-salon to it that's a little lacking for me. I know he loves intellectual discourse better than just about anything. But I don't know of a male friend he'd call for help if he was injured or depressed. I think in his life it's more been women who've been the people to be close to. With his male friends, the egos and intellectual competitiveness are always on display.

I need both. People who come by in holey Tshirts and some with whom I have dynamic conversations about life and relationships and the country, etc. A lot looser.

Maybe I'm providing that freer connection for M. And he's providing stability for me.

As to M's controlling/leading side...I think some of that he enjoys (too much!) and some is a burden from family expectations. I hope he continues in therapy and learns more about himself. I hope as he gets older, those insights will be as interesting to him as studying cultural histories has been. He seems amazed when the penny drops and he makes a connection about something psychological. Not as much of a navel-gazer as I am, but he does have a curious mind.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on November 16, 2019, 10:34:17 AM
It's nice that he's keen to learn, Hops, and that he sees it as a good thing to venture into.  Yes, I like a range of people, I think most guys I know tend to have work related friends rather than any other kind.  I don't know if work is a bigger part of their lives?  Whereas a lot of women fit it around kids, home and looking after older relatives (not that men don't do these things but I think often women do more of that).  So perhaps we come into contact with a wider range of people.  I think you sound like a good mix for each other :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on November 17, 2019, 10:42:24 PM
Definitely, CB!
I understand it; it just saddens me for him. (And it also can put a bit of extra stress on the female in a relationship if a man has little closeness with male friends. I notice M is basically mostly "masked", even with the men he's known for years.) But I agree he's past able to change this much, and I'm content being his person, not expecting to change that!

I don't mind the occasional more formal thing and am happy to sous-chef. M doesn't do those events that often, and he's always happy to get together with my friends which is casual and usually fun, except when he dominates conversation to the point I feel embarrassed. (One time though, a gathering included a couple of gay women, and when he tried his usual running the conversation the one next to him just ignored him and kept talking, unimpressed. I was glad! I don't think he's been around that many women who push back directly.) I continue to see my friends alone and always will. So when he really craves full-on dinner party stuff, I'm glad to go along.

Despite all the above, we're doing well. Love feelings intact, and our next meeting with the counselor tomorrow. A lot of tension has drained away since he agreed to do this, with no reluctance at all. We still have a few areas to work through about intimacy, which I'll find difficult to talk about in a room with two males, but we'll get there. (Or we'll go off to another T at some point who specializes.)

It's work, but it's worth it. I generally delight in his company. He turned up last night with a huge bunch of roses for no reason. And he's adorable with my pooch.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on November 19, 2019, 09:29:20 AM
I'm glad you're still doing OK with M, Hops.

I hope the next T appointment gives you lots of good information to make decisions on.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on November 19, 2019, 05:04:31 PM
Thanks, Tupp and Light.

I don't so much think it's decision-making (or in the short-term) that's my goal.
For me, for now, my goal in couples-T is to literally use the presence of the T as a guardrail, to help us listen to and learn more about each other.

M often seems SOOOO overstimulated and giddy in my presence that mature mutual dialogue is hard. Though he's been calmer and more adult with me lately. What I enjoy with the T is that interrupting is derailed, the pace calms, and when M is holding forth I can observe him quietly, and vice versa.

Early days, but I'm enjoying this process. It may sometimes be a bit like being a loving witness to some individual-T work on M's part, but I'm sitting there.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: CB123 on November 19, 2019, 08:22:29 PM
Your comment about the giddyness and overstimulation making conversation difficult, is interesting, Hops.

Do you have a handle on what is behind that? You know I have seen that kind of thing sometimes in my kids. Do you feel like he is just like that with you, or with everyone?

Pretty wise of you two to have a way to work this out with professional early on.

CB
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on November 20, 2019, 02:28:11 AM
CB, I honestly think it's the H in ADHD.
(I have the A and two Ds, but rarely the H part.)

M is a whirlwind at times. In the earlier part of our relationship, he was very anxious and hyper and ... giddy. I think he didn't know what to make of me but felt desperate after his huge loss to not lose me.

Since recent months, we've settled into a layer of commitment where he's calmed down, trusts my commitment is real if not quite as complete as his. And over time I've also communicated to him how that manic freaked-out stuff (which I think he thought was entertaining) was actually shredding my nerves. I think he was so caught up in his own feelings that it actually took him quite a while to observe that this over-the-top pursuit and over-reaction to Every Single Thing was not flattering me, it was overwhelming me.

The automatic fill-the-air-with-words (fear of silence) is still there, but better lately. It feels miraculous but I'm enjoying him more and more.

Thanks for asking, hon!

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on November 21, 2019, 12:56:20 PM
I had wedged the following into a reply on Farm Life, then realized it goes here. It's NOT anywhere near as true now -- M's behaving so much more naturally than he was when he was full-tilt compulsively-obey-fearsome-dead-grandmother's-formalities. I'm much more able to relax (less defensive) with some of his gentility reflexes (mostly on display in others' view). But I amused myself with these metaphors so what the heck:

....I trip over "protectiveness" in M's manly-Latin-man persona, just because it irritates me to bits. That's because unless I'm actually hurt or incapable, I don't NEED it, and it's like a reminder (in my case) of his need to display that he's the strong one, and I need "ushering" (errr, herding) to the table in a restaurant, to wait like a sheep beside the mare (err, chair) or gelding (errr, car door) until he scrambles around to grab the bridle (errrr, chair back/door handle), or to have the saddle cinched (errr, chair pulled out/reins taken) in case I was unaware that's how a horse (err, chair/car) actually works, despite my having arrived on my own (errr, feet on sidewalk/own butt in driver's seat) in the first place.

All my emoticons here are busted so visualize multi LOLs....and yes, I KNOW his intentions are pure and good. It's cultural stuff. What's fun is it's becoming more interesting than irritating with time. And he's beginning to notice how unconscious it is, himself. We still do the ballet but he's less often nearly-knocking-me-down in his devotion to every step of All The Rituals. (He's also seeing I do understand his intentions are not malign. Hardly.)
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on November 21, 2019, 07:06:51 PM
I'm glad you're feeling less defensive about all the formality, Hops.  My Step Father was all about that, in some ways.... it was very nice. 

I never warmed to being eyeballed at the dinner table, waiting for children's mistakes to be pointed out, and condemned.

But the car door opening, allowing a gentleman to lead in a restaurant when there's no one to seat us..... that was just OK by me. It felt special.... like warmth, and care and love.

I have to say it's annoying to wait for a door to be opened if I can get it over with more quickly, and get on, but there are kindnesses, and respect intended, IME.

I have a little time for those things, still.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on November 23, 2019, 04:23:08 AM
I had wedged the following into a reply on Farm Life, then realized it goes here. It's NOT anywhere near as true now -- M's behaving so much more naturally than he was when he was full-tilt compulsively-obey-fearsome-dead-grandmother's-formalities. I'm much more able to relax (less defensive) with some of his gentility reflexes (mostly on display in others' view). But I amused myself with these metaphors so what the heck:

....I trip over "protectiveness" in M's manly-Latin-man persona, just because it irritates me to bits. That's because unless I'm actually hurt or incapable, I don't NEED it, and it's like a reminder (in my case) of his need to display that he's the strong one, and I need "ushering" (errr, herding) to the table in a restaurant, to wait like a sheep beside the mare (err, chair) or gelding (errr, car door) until he scrambles around to grab the bridle (errrr, chair back/door handle), or to have the saddle cinched (errr, chair pulled out/reins taken) in case I was unaware that's how a horse (err, chair/car) actually works, despite my having arrived on my own (errr, feet on sidewalk/own butt in driver's seat) in the first place.

All my emoticons here are busted so visualize multi LOLs....and yes, I KNOW his intentions are pure and good. It's cultural stuff. What's fun is it's becoming more interesting than irritating with time. And he's beginning to notice how unconscious it is, himself. We still do the ballet but he's less often nearly-knocking-me-down in his devotion to every step of All The Rituals. (He's also seeing I do understand his intentions are not malign. Hardly.)

That did make me laugh, Hops.  I'm glad that you're finding it more interesting than irritating as time goes on.  I do know what you mean.  I'm not a fan of 'fluff' - the unnecessary stuff.  I like people who will muck in and help out.  If I'm under the weather, come and cut the grass - I don't want flowers.  And yes, the man stuff - please do deal with the spiders and go up in the loft but yes, I can open the car door myself lol.  I don't know what I'd do if man rushed to open a car door for me, I don't think that sort of thing is quite so usual here?  I'm struggling to think of a time a man did that for me (unless I had an armload of stuff to carry which, as you say, is when you do need someone to open the door for you).  Maybe we've knocked that out of British men lol xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on November 27, 2019, 07:14:27 AM
Hops, something Hol & I are actively working on... (re: criticism HEARD but not intended)...

is that we each OWN those attached "implied ulterior meanings" to things within our own minds/emotions and WE are the ones attaching those meanings a lot of times. Yeah, sure, sometimes there really IS a little dig or an unconscious/subconscious implied message involved. But it's not as often as I, or she, thinks... and that defensive reflex needs to get dialed back a little to facilitate actual conversation on the topic/issue.

Might not something similar be happening re: the "meaning" of those old world manners? At least sometimes?
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on November 27, 2019, 02:37:55 PM
Absolutely, Amber. No question about it!

M is just fairly unconscious how desperate his attempts to Obey Grandmother's Dictates Even if You Knock Someone Over Doing It can be.

Fortunately, with a little talk and some hilarity, we've found our own clunky ballet about it. Where it used to terrify my inner feminist it more often amuses me, now.

And what I needed to bring to the interactions is understanding (you should SEE the huge intimidating Central-American-aristocrat grandmother portrait) and humor. I've mostly gotten there.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on November 29, 2019, 11:05:55 AM
That sounds workable Hops - for both of you.

Can you make a post-it mustache to put on Gramma's portrait? LOLOLOL.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on November 29, 2019, 02:08:45 PM
Amber, that is a BRILLIANT idea! I just may try it.
Except I fear for his mental health when he walks past and sees it unawares...

He really does VENERATE the ancestors. Sheesh. Maybe I need to come up with some hippie pagan ceremony to release their hold on his spirit.

But man, that portrait is tempting. It's the kind of thing one would normally encounter in a museum. I'm sure she loved him and he her, yet it's also a reminder that M grew up in Another World. Old school to the max.

And then he ran off to Berkeley, became a wild rebellious creature, and an obsessively successful historian! He really is brilliant, no exaggeration, and that is SO much fun to be around, most of the time. (Maybe his Grandma-reflexes are a way of holding on to parts of himself that otherwise got scattered to the winds when he left CR and plunged into 60's California culture.)

I love him. He makes me smile. I feel much happier and safer in life because of him. There's no understating what a difference he's made. I am LUCCCCCKKKKKYYYY.

Gratitude is my favorite emotion, and this is my favorite holiday. I need to remind myself to tune into it every single day.

Hugs
Hops

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on November 30, 2019, 05:44:41 AM
I'm really glad things are going so well and you're happy, Hops.  You deserve to be happy so very much.  I'm reminded a little of when you first got Pooch - I seem to remember it was difficult at first and you were wondering if you should keep her or not?  But then it all settled down and became a full on love situation.  M is now Pooch :)  Lol.  I'm really pleased it's all going so well, even with Granny on the wall :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on November 30, 2019, 11:22:22 AM
Thank you, (((((((((Tupp))))))))))).

We do have some issues but are still doing couples counseling, just slowly,
since we signed up at a time when we were about to travel and same for him.
So I'm sure there will be some difficult work ahead, but equally sure we're both committed to doing our best with it.

We've slowed the pace of working out when/how to live together, which he says depends on selling his property in Costa Rica first. We'll find out. I try not to worry about that, although "am I leaving my little house?" looms. I guess the clear answer is of course I am. Just don't know when or where or how. That uncertainty is difficult for me but I understand his plan.

It's a real comfort to come here and summarize and spot-check everything as it goes along.

Big hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on December 06, 2019, 02:56:58 AM
M IS Pooch, Tupp! You got it!
I refuse to rub his belly, however.

She has become a beautiful sort of catalyst-connection-conveyance between us. I just love the interactions we have "through" her. Lots of laughter and affection and goofiness. He genuinely loves her and she has dropped her last resistance to him. It's been sweet to watch unfold.

And maybe she helped us get easier with our own affection too. It's far from "calm" but there are moments when we're settling down to an easy companionship. We went through some tensions, that's for sure. But something kept us trying and working at it, and now it keeps getting better.

One BIG thing is the couples-T. He's verrrrry insightful, to the point that even Brilliant M (who often slips into professor-who-knows-more-than-anyone-anywhere mode, alas) comes out excited, praising the T's "penetrating questions." We both feel really good about it and are, as I'd hoped, learning a lot more about each other with T's guidance. It feels very very good.

He controls M's interruptions and holds him to account for being dismissive on occasion. And he doesn't let me off the hook either. The nicest thing (which I never felt to this depth ever when I tried counseling with two husbands in the past) is that M and I feel CLOSER when we come out, MUTUALLY motivated and excited to be learning.

One invaluable thing I find in M is his eagerness to learn, which is evident in counseling despite the professor ego. Once we get into relationship issues, he seems open and fascinated and dedicated, and it really encourages me.

This is the first time I've been in early-days couple counseling and I'm experiencing a whole different kind of hope.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on December 06, 2019, 04:11:12 AM
I think that sense that you're both working on it and genuinely want it to work is such a good thing, Hops, and so much nicer than what often happens, which is that couples go to counselling when nothing else has worked and neither one of them can really be bothered any more.  It's great that you got into it sooner rather than later.  Good on you for putting the idea forward and good on M for being so engaged with the process and so open to trying it out and doing something new.

The therapist sounds great.  You need someone who is almost like a referee.  It must be difficult counseling couples as you have to mind two sets of needs and wants, without letting one dominate over the other.  He sounds like a good find.

And I think pets can be such a good barometer of how things are around them.  The fact that Pooch and M are getting on so well is a good sign.  I'm really pleased that you are working through this together and that things are moving forward and giving you hope for the future :)  It's really lovely to read xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on December 06, 2019, 12:42:42 PM
Thanks, Tupp.
Wish you and son and the whole board were here so we could have a celebratory potluck! Lighter cooks, Amber splits wood (even though I don't have a fireplace), CB decorates, Bettyanne roasts her toes and relaxes, Mud bellows carols and Doc G takes notes. Anybody I left out comes by unexpectedly to drag us all outside to build snowpeople. (Even though there's no snow yet.)

Reality seems so...optional, sometimes.

Dunno if I mentioned that this couples-T is a sikh. When I first saw him my heart sank. But even in the first session his questions were so intelligent and his kindness evident. I had a huge struggle when I got home and explained to M that I would need one more "consultation" before I could decide whether to work with him (which I did because M had responded so positively). M was fine with it.

So in session 2 I just laid out all my baggage about religion, particulary the kind which includes gurus, and men-in-religion (my ex boss/wannabe N-guru, my grandfather-preacher who abused his daughters, my years-ago Christian therapist whom I saw despite initial hesitation because he seemed kind and I didn't want to prejudge but who pressured me into marrying my second husband because he was uncomfortable with me being single and sexually active--which he didn't let on until after the disastrous wedding night/honeymoon, my recently-ex minister who manipulated and berated congregants and projected his many issues onto us, and twisted things that happen in the culture now because of religion.

He listened very patiently, as did M. I told him I was concerned that because his religion is difficult to forget about because he wears it on his head (turban) and face (beard) I might have difficulty trusting him. He explained that he converted in the 60s when he was entirely f**d up and had met a group of people who were into it, and while he lived there (a communal thing, very common then) he would follow along and one day said to himself, I need a structure for myself, these people are good, and I just need to make a commitment, so he did. (I also told him one reason I was willing was that I had a kind sikh friend at church and that I had read enough to know that the skih scriptures stipulate that women and men are equal in every way.) It was a LOAD.

Anyhow, his answers were reasonable, transparent, and I just stopped fearing it. And now I'm glad I did. I don't share his vocabulary about "the divine in all people" but I do know what he means and feel at peace with it.

My own scraps of faith (undiagnosed faith, hah) have been severely depleted by what's gone on at my church, which makes me really sad. I read about all the typical activities coming up and am entirely uninspired. BUT...we will eventually be past the holiday period (which is painful) and within a year, will have a new minister. I may just wait until then to start going back to see how things are.

Big ramble...
hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on December 06, 2019, 12:53:38 PM
Well I'm impressed that you were able to go in and tell him all of that, Hops, because I know with me that sort of unpacking scares me silly and I avoid it and have just not gone back to T's I didn't feel comfortable with.  Something for me to work on in the future :)  I'm glad he was able to allay your fear and yes, I have to say I don't have a lot of faith in religion, for similar reasons.  The endless focus on virgins bothers me enormously along with the never ending stream of child abuse cases that seem to just keep coming.  Then there are the Magdalen laundries in Ireland, horrifying stories of the abuse that went on there and it's something that I read a lot about over the years due to my dad's Irish roots.  I would have felt uncomfortable too, but I wouldn't have been as brave as you to tell him :)  I'm glad he has turned out to be such a good egg xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on December 06, 2019, 02:02:06 PM
I didn't realize you'd chosen a particular T. 

This wonderful experience with a Sikh male T might be more healing than if you'd ended up with anyone else.   

To be heard, feel understood, embrace and be embraced.... and feel safe enough to speak your truth with these guys is very special, IME.  I'm so glad things are going well.

Thanks for that update, Hops.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on December 16, 2019, 12:02:37 AM
I don't like it when M explains to me what my feelings are about.

He explains EVERYTHING in all circumstances. Professoritis.

I can handle it mostly, and often enjoy it. But not always.

Feeling building anxiety about the big trip. Need to focus.

SOOOOO glad I have both-T appointments tomorrow!

Arrrrgggghhhh,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on December 16, 2019, 06:02:55 PM
How did T go, Hops?

You're so good at speaking with compassion..... I can imagine it's hard to get your point across.

I sure hope the T straightened it out: )

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on December 16, 2019, 08:06:35 PM
Well, my own T at 2:00 is a perfect setup for couples-T at 3:00 (half a block away). In the new year she'll have to change the day, but I enjoyed this while it lasted. There will be benefits from not doing both the same day too (one thing being I'll be less likely to make first-hour all about the second-hour...which isn't just for me).

It was good in both sessions. My T listened to me dump a lot of anxiety buildup over the trip and some of M's not-hearing-me behaviors. Then we went to couple-T, who is very smart and insightful and tends to be able to state the bottom line of what I'm struggling to describe. I think we were lucky to find him.

Long story short, he suggested that M respond to me setting a boundary with a specific phrase, "I hear you and I love you." As a way of reminding himself. And for me, he encouraged me to be willing to be more authoritative in my own behalf in terms of stating what I need (drawing boundaries) and not being fearful of sticking to it.

That was great. And because I've been feeling a need to focus on myself and not have so many M-messages (morning, afternoon and evening emails, plus periodic voicemails and an evening call) coming in at the moment, particularly as I'm gearing up for a long and daunting trip (plus holiday gifts for him and his family, etc)...T asked M, would it be all right with you if she makes the next step toward you, are you content to wait for that? M said, of course (never mind my past experience with him absolutely freaking out). I think in part he said it because he admires and wants to impress Sikh-T. Works for me!

We had a nice dinner together and then M said as he left, I'll wait to hear from you, and I just said thank you, that would be great. Interestingly, he came up instantly with two other "urgent" things he might still need to contact me about...(bringing over his fig plant so my housesitter can water it--hellloooo, we don't leave until the 23rd--and one other small pretext-for-contact that I can't recall). And I just said No, neither of those are urgent.

So we'll see. I'll probably just take a day or two to shake off the ritual contacts I'd begun to feel a little smothered by. And then be ready to receive (and even enjoy) them again. It's just the way I am. Comes a point when it feels as though he's literally programming me to never stop thinking about him for five minutes.

I think about him anyway. But he works MUCH too hard to ensure I never stop, and for me it's been getting out of balance. This T session was a huge help. I like the T a lot. He and I often connect through eye contact while M is on a talking roll. Not condescending, just a glance that tells me he completely sees all that's happening and is holding us both in a compassionate and very alert way.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on December 17, 2019, 01:46:22 AM
Aw, Hops, the T does sound great, really good match for you, I would think, and somehow even nicer than he is Sikh, as I imagine a good experience with a religious person will be a good thing for you after so many negatives?  Provides a bit of balance for you :)

Yes, there are lines, aren't there?  Someone wanting to hear your voice is lovely.  Someone contacting you so often that you can't hear your own voice isn't.  I do get and understand that completely.  Some people really like that sort of constant contact but it's the sort of thing that drives me nuts :)  We're just all different, aren't we, in so many ways.  I'm really glad you and M have this nice T to help you through things and that M is taking it all onboard (at least in the office, at any rate!).  I hope he is able to ease off a little bit and let you breath through the holiday season, Hops.  It would be nice for you to be able to enjoy the time with his family xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on December 17, 2019, 11:37:09 AM
Quote
Someone wanting to hear your voice is lovely.  Someone contacting you so often that you can't hear your own voice isn't.  I do get and understand that completely.

Maybe YOU could be a sorta-T, Tupp!

Your responses to things are so succinct, compassionate and direct. Thank you.

Hey, they have online counseling these days....I'm sure there are sites that hire non-professionals who communicate well who can either correspond with someone or talk to them over Skype. Well, I'm not sure. I'm just making it up.

I would "counsel by email" any time. I read a few good advice columnists (Carolyn Hax at the Post started as a copyeditor, and so did Dear Prudence of Slate.com), most of whom are NOT psychologists...and always wished I could do that job.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on December 20, 2019, 09:19:17 PM
Hi All,
I'll probably contradict myself by posting like mad over the next couple days, but just in case I don't, that'd mean I've yielded to reality and am trying to finalize my trip-prep in calm so I don't get all stressed before we leave Monday the 23rd. I may be able to post from Costa Rica but am generally hoping to go cold turkey, internet wise. I'll have access if I need it but hope I can stay more in the present moment and present place and busy absorbing whatever this new thing is going to be. (I'd better be open to learning all I can as I may be there twice a year.)

I'm in a much better place about the trip than I was. We'd worked out w/couple-T that I didn't want so much "checking in" contact withe M for a couple days, and the peace of that did me wonders!

Tonight we went to dinner and had a great time. M started when he got to the house after cuddles saying, "It was rough..." and I right away said, I understand, but those feelings are for you to work out in your own therapy. And he didn't argue! So I didn't let him make me responsible for soothing him and I think he actually got it. Big relief. Anyway, we really enjoyed being together.

Came back here and did early-Xmas gift exchange, since it'd be dumb to schlep presents to Central Am. He gave me a very thoughtful gift. A weighted blanket, which I'd once read for some folks with ADD and/or insomnia (mine's awful), can be very helpful. Perfect! I gave him a hinge-framed set of pix: one of us together at a restaurant I'd asked a server to take....and an epically cute one of him laughing with Pooch on his lap at a winery. I also gave him as a joke (unframed) a collage print of the same two, which for some reason came out with a fat bottom margin. On that space under the pic of we two I wrote with  a Sharpie, "100%" and under the one of him with Pooch,"49%." (That referred to our lengthy negotiation about who owns my dog, which we settled on being I own her 51% and he 49%, and his half is the back half.) He loved both. I also gave him a DNA kit, which I figure should be interesting for a historian. He's interested!

It was affectionate, relaxed and fun. I do love the man.

Turns out if I set and hold the boundaries I need, I'm freer to love him when I'm with him. Duh. Will take practice but I'm determined to get more comfortable with it.

So I'll probably be posting again very soon but either way, will definitely be typing here again by mid-January, latest.

In the meantime, Happy New Year early, y'all. I love you and send each of you mucho hopes for your happiness.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on December 21, 2019, 09:52:48 AM
Hugs Hops... I hope you both have a lovely time! Sounds like a great idea to get away from the cold for a little bit.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on December 21, 2019, 12:06:02 PM
Hops!  I'm so glad you're feeling so relaxed around the trip.  That's wonderful: )

Take pictures. I used to keep travel journals with local plants, wine labels, and details I'd forget if not jotting things down.

We'll miss you!

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on December 22, 2019, 12:15:09 PM
HA! While I'll miss Hops' warm unique way with words and compassion... I'm expecting a complete travelogue and romance story when she comes back!! LOL   (not really, but I am nosy...)

An amazon slumber party kind of thing...
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on January 09, 2020, 02:18:46 AM
Got in an hour ago...all is well.
Mellow Pooch, my sweet home.

It's going to take me a good while to catch up with y'all.
I read your posts every chance I got but could barely reply
with two-finger typing and episodic access. Missed being in
the daily flow here! And I'm sorry not to have offered support
to y'all every day as you always have me. I'll try to catch up
but please forgive me in advance if it's pretty inadequate.

SO much to say about this trip and I'm too wired to sleep so
I'll try at least a little summary.

It was exciting and wonderful to see Costa Rica and M's other life.
His family is very kind but so upper-class they are more formal than I enjoy.
But they liked me and I liked them too, despite the language barriers. At our
last dinner at an amazing restaurant in San Jose a woman came up to our
table and said she just had to tell us what fun it was to hear us bouncing
back and forth between languages. I was speaking English with M's brother
beside me on one side, French with his Chilean brother-in-law on the other
side. M was speaking mostly Spanish with his sister and other brother on
each side of him but English across the table to me, as his sister was too.
It was fun. The place was a huge old home originally owned by the Central
America equivalent of the Nabisco family, renovated into an astonishing place
by a couple of wealthy Canadians 18 years ago. For some reason there are
a lot of Canadian expats there.

Where to start. First few days we were in M's big condo (my house and a
half) that overlooks the city but closer in, a nature reserve. The combo makes
an amazing view. My favorite tree is called "fire in the forest" -- orange flowers
all over the canopy. Birds, you can imagine. The place is stunning and I'm happy
I got to stay there as he thinks it's finally sold, and is negotiating that now. Huge
relief for him as he was sick of managing it from the US and truly doesn't need
or want it any more. Those days included Xmas Eve and a few more visits with
family...all of whom (lost count) are really lovable and made me very welcome.

Next week was different. We were in M's house in the jungle in Guanacaste,
about four hours away on the Pacific coast. Really stunning property he designed
and planned from the house (with a tower like Hemingway's) to the gardens and
stone gateposts after a place in Spain he loved. He's extremely and deservedly
proud of it. Spacious, lovely, comfortable and very isolated. It was three days
before I met anyone else who spoke English. (Nice Canadian neighbors.)

What happened was that this was too much isolation and togetherness, and M
began to express frustration and criticisms he never had before so bluntly, and
his personality -- chiefly his habit of nonstop talk, including when we finally did
have the neighbors come up for champagne and he talked/lectured the entire
time and nobody else got a word in...and I just couldn't take it. Even though his
professor-knowledge about EVERYTHING is unmatched (culture, history, food, on
and on and on) he just dominates constantly. Later we argued and I suddenly roared
at him that I couldn't STAND the way he talked about his architect. It felt to me that M's
ego combined with his pride in the place just took off, and he repeatedly bragged and bragged
so much about all the wonderful things he did, and knows, and understands, and designs,
and he explains (to EVERYONE at EVERY opportunity) that for a time I just couldn't stand
him. He came off like an arrogant clueless braggart and though I understood him, I didn't
LIKE him. His knowledge is encyclopedic (neighbors looked both impressed and repressed
by the monologue) and on its own fascinating, but he's so pedantic and way too determined
to force-teach anyone about everything at every occasion.

It was very painful and I suddenly wanted badly to go home and felt like ending the
relationship. I got myself together and calmed down, but it was tense and miserable.
It was a huge relief to get back to San Jose and the spacious condo and the tension
drained away and we got back to a happy way of interacting and enjoyed the rest of
the trip. We had a lot of fun traveling, in airports, etc., and got back to loving each
other again. But those days in the jungle house were a revelation and not a happy one.
We were peaceful and playful together back at the condo and cooperated happily on
domestic stuff, lazing about, making meals, tidying up for the potential buyer. Confusing.
(Maybe that means a city house here would be okay? I'm full of doubt but still some hope.)

I'm not freaking out about it (yet), but I'm newly unsure whether I could live with him. I just
don't know that I can adapt to him FT because it is so difficult for him to control himself
verbally. One bright note is that he expressed interest in being formally evaluated for
ADHD, which I think could help. And we're still going to be doing the T together, which
always helps. We might wind up as long-term companions who never marry, which is
fine except that if I'm honest, I fear walking away from that security he's offering.
If the T is a miracle worker maybe he can teach M how not to drive me away. I know he
loves (and needs) me and I do love him still. But that week in the jungle left me unsure,
emotionally unsafe, and so stressed (I had tachycardia so bad it woke me up) that I
suddenly thought of his personality issues as health risks for me. He doesn't grasp
his effect on me without a big struggle. He isn't connecting with his impact on others.

Another thing that was important is seeing him in the context of that family and that
country and hearing so much more about it that I realize he really has felt rootless in
some ways, living in several countries...and that plus whatever it is in his brain that
causes such agitated and unaware behavior is really about running. He proposed a
bunch more trips and I haven't been able to tell him yet but this one was really too
much for me. Managed not to get sick but did learn that nonstop togetherness with
him is not possible for me. I'd lose my mind. (I did grasp how torn he feels between
two cultures, and how the jungle house in its traditional village area represents TRUE
home-in-Costa-Rica to him.) He wants to keep it and come there for long stays (a month
or several) and I couldn't bring myself to tell him I don't care if I never go there again.
The roads were so rutted it killed my back every time we went anywhere and the lack
of anyone else to talk to would not be good for me over time. MAYBE if we'd gotten
very happy and calm as a couple and I were writing....but as of now, it's not for me.)

So that's the big (and confusing) bottom line. Not sorry I went but it's NOT okay that
he will talk and talk and talk and not let up until I'm so stressed my heart acts up.

And yet for the last few days it was lovely, peaceful and cooperative. Maybe because
I knew we were heading home soon, and because at the condo we had huge space
and he was less excited about talking (nonstop) about the jungle house. Dunno, dunno.
We also did get some talking in that was about us, and about him and his family dynamics
and a lot of other things, in the way we have always done well at times, so it felt more real.

SO glad to be here again.

love,
Hops
PS Costa Rican food is just incredible. Most dishes are simple but every ingredient
is so fresh the flavors are fantastic. I don't eat meat or poultry but we had fresh
fish nearly every day and vegetables that just sang.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on January 09, 2020, 04:05:33 AM
Ah, Hops.  Well I'm glad the good bits were good and I'm glad you were able to express your frustrations - I do think it's good that you're not afraid to tell him what you think and how you feel.

It's not good, of course, that he induces that level of stress in you at times.  Perhaps he does need a stimulating environment, rather than an isolated one, to keep his brain ticking over on other things?  Perhaps he could do some of his trips without you as you go forward - absence making the heart fonder and all that.  Do you think he feels pressured when with family and was then 'letting off steam' afterwards when things calmed down?  They sound nice and friendly but we all know how much can bubble underneath the surface with family situations.

I'm glad you're so honest with yourself about the situation and that you don't try to sugar coat yourself.  It's hard to be honest about things we don't want in our lives.  I still hope you can find a way forward that suits you both and works for both of you, because the love does seem genuine and sincere.  Glad Pooch was all good when you got back.  Rest well, sleep lots and look forward to hearing more later xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on January 09, 2020, 11:34:27 AM
I'm glad you're back, ((Hops.))

IME travel is fraught with stress and opportunity for revelation.  Just exhausting and exciting and amazing in bouts, IME.

M is still who he is, even if he's working on his more negative traits.  They're a part of him.

I kind of think the T will help you two straighten all this out.  Much confidence there.

The points that stick out for me were how negative the jungle home is FOR YOU and how much trouble it creates between you and M.  I have the feeling M sensed your reluctance to be smitten and impressed and that reluctance brought out his insistence and overbearing ego/shadow side.  I withdraw when I feel that way too and it never makes things better, IME.  The person requiring reassurance, attention and admiration tend to get desperate, which makes me withdraw even more,IME and it snowballs from there.

I was also concerned about M's expressing bluntly his frustrations and criticisms of you, I presume?  Did he make it very personal and if so, did you feel this is how he'll begin treating you more and more often?

I guess you couldn't expect to get through that much travel completely unscathed.  M struggles.  He's going to struggle.  It's a process to make big change. 

You have the good and the bad to sort out in all this.  Like any relationship. I'm very curious about what the T will say about the trip.

Ther's going to have to be strategies for you when you're feeling trapped and yacked at incessantly, IMO.  You have to have a way to mitigate the stress on your health, and not trigger M into more uncontrolled behavior.  I really do believe he loses ability to see what he's doing and how it affects others.

Rest up.  Snuggle pooch.  It's going to be OK.

Lighter
 
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on January 09, 2020, 10:08:33 PM
Thank you so much, ((((Tupp)))). I'm so very sorry you had a hellishly sad Xmas. I have had so many and all I can offer is that year over year, the holidays do become less powerful. Thank god. I'll offer more over on your threads as I catch up. Just...hugs to you.

Quote
Perhaps he does need a stimulating environment, rather than an isolated one, to keep his brain ticking over on other things? 
I think that's very true. Maybe when he's alone with me and his hyperbrain is needing that he drills into me as the handiest topic to examine critically at times. I just can't allow it, so he will have to deal. I thought it was interesting that he expressed some interest in confronting ADHD. It would be wonderful if he learned that though it's wonderful to have a brilliant brain, there are downsides to having a manic one. At least in the wear and tear on personal relationships, or his with me anyway. I do think the T is a safe zone for us and the miracle after this trip is, there's still love there. No guarantees and I will not delude myself. Thank you for seeing THAT part of me. I'm grateful.

Perhaps he could do some of his trips without you as you go forward - absence making the heart fonder and all that. 
He'll have no choice, because I'm not going to take unlimited trips with him unless I feel confident I won't be trapped in a grinding bickering session with him again. It goes both ways, I can dish it out too when I'm feeling strong, but it's my model of misery (had that ongoing especially in my first marriage and it ruined it) and I would rather die alone and poor than repeat that for the years before dying. i can't take it. Literally. (Heart.) In fact, the trip he plans for us in April-May to Spain and Portugal was to be a whole lot of driving and he's now realizing that because of my back pain, it may not be wise. I told him I'm not sure I will be up to going and will let him know either way in time to cancel. My back was very painful this time and the drive he said would be three hours turned out to be six, the last two on jolting, rutted jungle roads. Exciting to see but in the shape I'm currently in, way too painful. I plan to get more PT shortly and also begin an exercise class, because I don't have to be in pain always if I get my ass moving again. That's on me. I've let myself go and it'll be hard work to regain fitness but there is no more excuse.

Do you think he feels pressured when with family and was then 'letting off steam' afterwards when things calmed down?
Yes. I think being in Costa Rica triggers all sorts of complicated emotions of loss and feeling rootless and conflict with who he was groomed to be and who he actually became (which took a lot of guts)...and the cost he felt (loss of that idyllic childhood in paradise) as he acquired his freedom. I don't think he's ever made peace with it all, which is part of the reason he travels so much. In transition, he feels most at home. Plus, with constant stimulation. Exciting but exhausting. And even if he was letting off steam, I have to be firm in setting boundaries that make clear he must find other ways to deal with his jangled feelings than acting them out with me. That's on him, it's his work, and I will support but not do it for him. I don't know yet whether he'll dive deep enough in therapy to do that kind of growth. I hope it for him and for both of us.

How you manage to be so wise and kind when caught in some pain and reckoning and dealing with tough realities of your own never ceases to startle and inspire me, Tupp. Thank you.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on January 09, 2020, 10:22:25 PM
Lighter, you are so perceptive. You really do see his needs/behaviors with such clarity. Thank you.

Quote
I have the feeling M sensed your reluctance to be smitten and impressed and that reluctance brought out his insistence and overbearing ego/shadow side.  I withdraw when I feel that way too and it never makes things better, IME.  The person requiring reassurance, attention and admiration tend to get desperate....

You're right. He really is desperate for it. And I am equally desperate, or determined, not to be the sole source of admiration/supply for him. I can't and won't deliver. It is TOO MUCH LIKE LIFE WITH N-MOM. So with T's help, I hope I can get him to see that doing deep work on his own to answer his own unmet core needs is the only way I can stay by his side, encouraging him in the work but not becoming a substitute target for his upsets and frustrations. That is not what I could or want to do in a late-life marriage or partnership. As amazing as M is, he has waited 'til very late in life to begin a bit of self-analysis, and it really is up to him whether he is brave enough to "go there" without resenting me for requiring it. He does lack emotional maturity and self-control. I don't really "require" that he take on self discovery, actually. But I know that if he doesn't take responsibility for learning what's beneath the things he does that grind at healthy connection, and especially his appetite for his own verbosity over everything...I'll leave. That's the blunt truth. No rush but I could see it coming, in that isolated place. Too soon to call it and things did get better. But there it is.

Quote
I was also concerned about M's expressing bluntly his frustrations and criticisms of you, I presume?  Did he make it very personal and if so, did you feel this is how he'll begin treating you more and more often?

That's the most important question and why I felt a red flag might be waving. By the time we made it back to San Jose it was obvious that he too wanted the tension to end and that it troubled him a lot that it had happened. But if any man will go there once, there is fear that he'll do it again. M is quite dominant when he wants to be and if I'm feeling strong I can hand it right back to him and refuse to accept that. What I need to feel in a relationship is both safety and permission to be NOT strong. M adores my intellectual strength and the ways I challenge him like an equal, when I do. But when I'm not well he glazes over. He even said at one point about something I'd raised, "I am not interested in the details." The irony of that overwhelmed me, because when he's talking or giving one of his unwanted or even exhausting pedantic lectures he could care less if HIS audience is "interested in the details." There it was in a nutshell. My worry is that I'm pushing seventy and have a need to feel emotionally safe. Not cosseted but certain that no one will treat me in an unkind or ruthless way, even just in discussion. Because whether or not I should ever revert to scared inner child, I can. And I don't want a mate who would do that kind of stuff when I'm most vulnerable. He talks a blue streak about love, but does lack empathy. And it worries me. 

I'm glad you feel confident about our T; I do as well. He's quite brilliant himself and I hope he can get through to M. Either way, I'm going to continue to take care of myself and move forward in my life with some of my own goals for my home, and my writing, and my friendships and other activities. I can't afford to keep M front and center in my vision all the time, as much as he professes he does the same with me. Being loved is great, being smothered is not. Especially by someone you feel you can't trust completely until he develops some self insight. Insight is everything, because without it, one deflects responsibility forever.

It all, always, comes back to the reciprocity thing. M may feel that if he provides, I owe him the nonstop listening. But my nature is such that it can be tormenting to me. And I did tell him at one point that I know I need both love and freedom in a relationship, but if I'm ever forced to choose one, it'd be freedom. I think that sunk in. We'll see.

Thanks again for these insights.

Hugs and HNY,
Hops


Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on January 10, 2020, 08:41:40 AM
Hi Hops! Glad you're home and that you had some fabulous time on your trip, even if there was something tough to deal with, come up. I've kept 2 "man tests" in my head for years... one is setting up a tent with him - takes clear communication and absolute concentration and cooperation. The other is some sort of "road trip" experience - both people are outside their normal environment and encountering new situations and people and sometimes trials & tribulations.

I can sympathize with your need to retreat from the professorial "talkiness". I have a D like that; in her case she's designated her sweetie as some kind of emotional security blanket and when he leaves for work - the talkiness goes into overdrive, she turns critical - all while proclaiming how objective and "right" her observations are and it can get nasty. Abandonment issues? Daddy issues? (I'm suspecting but not sure.)

On the one hand, I'd say that there are lots worse things to put up with than that non-stop verbosity BUT when it turns into a personal, relational critique I gotta agree with you about how serious an issue it is. It's related to judgement, I think - based on some inner needs that a healthy relationship ISN'T supposed to meet. The judgement is almost like a temper tantrum - demanding, angry, and projecting the obligation to meet the need (because the person doesn't know how to?) onto others. "Make me feel good" seems to be the implied message. Or "why are you not impressed with my awesomeness?" and "How dare you have a different perception, opinion or feeling than I do?"

Rather than get assertive and make some sharp retorts to this or put on the all-powerful "mom" hat - I've just been quietly physically removing myself from the conversation. If I stay and stand my ground, it begins to escalate into out & out confrontation. I seldom have the energy for that and she IS stronger than I am and refuses to be humble or just human... even though she BS's a good game - it's a distortion of her impacts on other people. I am not her only target; her friend John who is here has taken the same thing. Having someone else around - to confirm my perception or see something I missed or perceive it differently - has been helpful. We often debrief and that's been an oasis for me and a relief from abject misery over what kind of torture she's going through internally to feel the need to express it outwardly and project it onto others.

I hope M is continuing his personal therapy Hops. The couples T can help with toolkits but I think this behavior (which is only one thing "wrong", right?) of his needs to be unpacked, sorted, processed, and dealt with too. John and I keep bringing that up to Hol, too but without pressuring her.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: CB123 on January 10, 2020, 09:29:43 AM
Hops,

The thing that concerns me is that his critical, attacking behavior only occurred when you were isolated with him and ended when you reached civilization. That would be a red flag for me, but sadly was not when I went through it. As a matter of fact, I reacted similarly as you, mostly such relief after it was over that I was willing to keep trying.

I found that the issues that were very real could have been an opportunity for me to do some self-examination about why I reacted the way I did. My initial (and long-term) response was to verbally analyze him, to be part of his enlightenment, in a sense, I wanted to be his savior I think. I would like to have those years back. I would like to have back the energy I spent trying to make him my safe place.

It's a hell of a process disentangling from it. The turmoil interspersed with sheer joy is addictive. I'm still discovering ways in which it changed me.

CB
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on January 10, 2020, 06:48:32 PM
Thank you, ((((((((((CB)))))))))))).
A sober warning I know you came by with intense direct experience.
I promise it's in my mind and will come up with my (and our) T.

One difference is my fears of impoverished old age, plus how genuine I think his appreciation is of me, most of the time.

I think getting a clear-eyed total view will still take (and deserves) more time, and more insight from both my-T and our-T.

I won't pledge my life to M unless I get a real sense that he's committed to a deep dive. Some hope, for me, lies in how motivated he is by knowledge. I think it's possible, though hardly guaranteed, that he'll actually embark on this kind of inner work. It's more learning, and he lives for knowledge.

Until I know, I don't want to toss the baby with the bathwater. But I'm nowhere near as dedicated to sustaining something unsupportable as I was for so long years back, particularly in my second marriage.

M is startled by how determined I am to NOT move into deeper commitment with him. He thinks once love is declared it's "as simple as that". I couldn't disagree more and won't budge unless I see real evidence that it's going to be sane and sound.

I value and appreciate your warnings. One difference in our lives, and a big one, is that I have no family whatsoever, at my back. No children who would shelter or care about what happens to me in old age. Unfortunately, that's a real factor in my considerations now. I'm trying full-heartedly to keep that in balance, and my T supports those questions in both scenarios.

I won't give myself over to maltreatment, ever. I am way way too stubborn and feisty for that. And if I don't see evidence that he begins to understand the difference between doting and empathy, I will step away.

Hey. I had very good luck in meeting him online and have had an amazing year with him I will never regret no matter what the long-term outcome is. And there's absolutely nothing to prevent me from doing it again if M and I don't make it for the long haul.

I'm grateful for all this experience. I'm really glad I ventured it. And I still have hopes for us. Just not expectations, which is for me a huge difference.

Reality is still my (best) friend.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on January 10, 2020, 08:35:56 PM
Hi Hops:

Lets remember you don't have to do anything.

If you marry M... you don't have to stay married.

If you get engaged.... you don't have to get married.

If you move in, you don't have to stay there. 

There are no mistakes.  There are only chances to explore what you and M have together, could have together, will have together. 

If it's hell..... you can go.  You don't need his permission.  There's no shame in being brave enough to risk love, IME.

You're a big girl and you have decisions to make.  No judgment.  Just discovery.

If there's ups and downs.... things are pretty normal.

If there's more hell than not.... it's time to make a move.  You have your own home.  You have friends.  You have a very good mind and ability to advocate for yourself. 

I say be fearless.  Don't waste time.  Get to where you want to be and see if it's where you thought you were going.

It might be better.

Might be hell.

You won't know until you get there and no one says you have to stay if you don't want to.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on January 10, 2020, 09:34:37 PM
Thank you, (((Lighter))).

You're absolutely right. I always will have choice.

And so far, I really don't sense "hell." Not at all.
Just a sense that isolation and being cut off from my independent supports apart from him would not be good for me. I'm not up for an enmeshed all-dependent kind of thing.

But I'm not sure M would want that either, despite his declarations about me. He is writing books, for f's sake...and still very absorbed in his scholarship (thank heaven). We may settle back into a very nice sharing routine with a balance of separate interests.

We will have been together a year next month. And have come a long way in that time. That said, it's still early days and as you wisely point out...I can keep on aiming at the kind of bond I want to build and extricate myself at any point if I feel the need.

Alone in the jungle was really a fairly extreme test. We didn't exactly fail it but were tested under the strain. And maybe that's okay in the bigger picture.

Time, and T work, and me living my own life more fully and healthily, will tell.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: CB123 on January 12, 2020, 10:48:48 AM
Hops,

I hadnt realized that the issue of financial security was part of the equation. I do understand, truly I do. That was a large consideration in my marriage as well, so I get it. I stayed much longer than I would have because of finances, and of course the kids.

I'm wishing you the very best and I hope you understand my concern is well meant, however clumsily I might express it, dear friend.

CB
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on January 13, 2020, 02:20:53 AM
Hops, I just thought I'd mention something I've discovered as I've been researching communes for myself and son :)

In the UK, there are ever increasing numbers of people setting up, or becoming part of, housing co-operatives.  Instead of all living together in a shared house, people are either buying land to build multiple properties on, or they're buying already existing homes, perhaps several in the same street or on the same housing estate.  Another thing some are doing is buying a large property and then converting it into flats or small houses.  The properties are then either sold or rented out, the benefit being you get your own space and live your own life, but you are part of a community that literally lives only steps away, so it's easy for people to get together, help each other out and to share costs for things like bulk buying food, or sharing a veg patch or something like that.  Car share is pretty popular in these sorts of places as well.

I think the point of setting it up as a co-operative is something to do with the way it all works legally (it means that people can't sell their house to a developer who wants to build fifteen houses in the back garden or something like that).

Anyway, the only reason I mention it is in case it might be worth you doing a bit of research at some point to see if similar sorts of set ups exist in the States, so that you might have an option between 'relationship' and 'poor and alone'.  I do understand your concerns exactly - I have exactly the same worries about myself and son.  And unlike you, I have already given up hope of meeting someone who might change that situation for me :) I might work on that at a later date :)  But anyway, I thought I'd mention it as you get some of the perks of being part of a like minded community without having to keep washing other people's plates whenever you want a sandwich or having to move into a retirement village :)

Hope you are readjusting to being home okay and catching up on sleep and Pooch cuddles :)
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on January 14, 2020, 01:36:17 AM
Quote
"Make me feel good" seems to be the implied message. Or "why are you not impressed with my awesomeness?" and "How dare you have a different perception, opinion or feeling than I do?"

Thanks, Amber. I think the first two quotes are pretty apt, for that jungle week when he just let loose with ego, insecurity and obsession with his own feelings...about Costa Rica, the house as symbolic of it all for him, his accomplishment in designing and building it, blah and blah. There's lots of loss and dislocation and unrootedness that it's all about. The third thing doesn't apply really, because fundamentally M does respect me. My mind.

What happened today was that the T was brilliantly present and observant as ever, and stopped M every time he'd either interrupt or contradict something I'd just said. He spelled out to M his habit of eloquently replying to me, Oh yes, I understand this, but...or however...and then "rewriting" what I said to fit his own narrative. (How wonderful our relationship is, how much he loves me, etc.) He also talks a lot saying "we this" and "we that" and the T stopped that too.

It was very perceptive and really kind of remarkable. The thing that makes me feel better is that M is genuinely humble and receptive in therapy. We even talked about an aborted intimate encounter when I felt completely unheard in a way that made me just give up. Anyway, I held nothing back. I described every detail of the experience from my perspective and it was a huge relief to do that with the counselor. M was distressed to hear it but he heard it. More significantly, I described exactly how I'd felt at the jungle house and during different times during the trip. M had written me an email saying, "The last 17 days were completely wonderful." It struck me as a wonderful condensation of the pattern and the T totally got it. I said there were 4 or 5 days of it that were the opposite of wonderful to me, how vulnerable and isolated I felt and how much I'd disliked M at the time for being so self absorbed.

I literally think when M is almost incantatorily talking nonstop (his form of self soothing, I think), he actually has no idea about my distress level. He's not trying to be cruel but doesn't realize how he's not making an empathic connection, but staying cerebral. The T got it too but didn't blame or criticize M; he's just working to help him see it. He advised him his professoritis is not working for him and that for him to get the commitment he wants from me, he is going to have to be the student, not the teacher. M agreed with him, agreed with all of it.

We are both colossally impressed with the T, and M is not aggressive or defensive at all in the sessions. He seems hugely motivated to make it work. I'm not saying I assume or am positive it will, just that M's attitude in therapy is amazingly open and receptive, in my view. (I've been in therapy with an ex who made it very obvious that he had contempt for both me and T, and we divorced. M's behavior is the opposite.)

M also pointed out that except for a couple of months after his divorce, he's never been in therapy before and I'm "way ahead of him." I thought that was fair (I've spent decades in therapy) and the T said, all the more reason you need to be listening to her. He also described me to M as being very concerned with how others are feeling and that he wanted me to be more responsive in the moment when M goes into his obliviousness.

All in all, it was a huge relief to have the T express in front of M that he clearly got how vulnerable I was feeling during the trip, and he'd ask M, did you notice how she was feeling in this moment or that one? And M's responses showed M himself that he had missed it. That was validating.

I don't think it's malice or hidden horrors. I just think he's lived in his brain for a very long time, and in different cultures from me, and with different kinds of women (never an American), and has an oversized ego (insecurity) and he says over and over that I am different from any woman he's ever known, etc etc. He enumerates why and he really means it. But, his lists of compliments don't fix things for me --I want empathy, not a list of assets, and the T totally gets this. Whew.

And...we do love each other. I don't doubt his sincerity, at all. If he continues with me in this process, I think it's worth it for both of us, no matter what the final outcome is. He seems deeply committed to it and also seems to have huge respect for the T. I've never seen him react to another man that way, have only seen him with his peers/academic colleagues, when they're jousting.

All in all, I feel better. I see the cardiologist tomorrow and am anxious about that, but if it's a reassuring visit I know I'll be feeling way better this time tomorrow night.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on January 14, 2020, 01:45:04 AM
((((CB))))
Of course I know your concern is well meant! Sweet woman.
And it's not misplaced, either. I am vigilant about what's happening and holding nothing back in the T sessions, and intend to be more open with M as well.

I don't know what will happen but if I need to end it at some point, I believe I'll be able to. Old age alone or broke does scare me but I'm way better off than many people and my fears may be bigger than they need to be. The feelings are real about that, but I earn enough social security to survive as long as I can function independently. I'm just haunted by abandoned oldsters in nursing homes and so forth. Still, I will not let financial security lull me into a bad marriage. Fate worse than I don't know what.

And M knows I'm not marrying him unless therapy really moves us into a balanced and healthy place. I don't want to pre-judge what he's capable of in therapy, because he's actually got an amazing mind and willing heart. He's deficient in EQ, but I don't think it's fair to rule out that he could grow as much as anybody. His motivation seems real and profound and his behavior reflects it. Rather than coming out of a session like today's mad at me or defensive, he's more tender than ever. He genuinely wants it to work.

There's a lot of good in him. A few pink flags I can live with but I will confront myself if I see red ones. The man's lived in a bubble for a long time but he seems desperate to break out of it.

love,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on January 14, 2020, 01:51:58 AM
(((((Tupp))))) -- We're on the same page!

One persistent interest of mine for years has been aging issues, including co-housing, shared housing, etc. I know a good deal about it. Unfortunately the only cohousing communities here (there are two) are too expensive for me. This area's very pricey even for that.

When I was still hoping to inherit my mother's big house one of my plans was to get two or three female friend roommates and create our own co-house for old age, pooling resources etc. But that didn't work out because of my brother (and the fact that my friends have their own plans and generally are better off). I checked out the other two as well. Then as I've talked about a lot here, I've helped elderly folks in independent apartments in old-age developments, and learned what they pay each month. Out of my reach.

But. There's a new nonprofit here I've begun to volunteer for that is based on healthy people (mostly in 60s or 70s) doing for free for frail elders exactly the kind of thing I've done for pay. Then, one day, if you need similar help so you can age in your home as long as possible, you can turn to this network for chores, drivers, shopping help etc -- at no charge. It's a brilliant concept that's already underway in some cities and I'm looking forward to working on it here.

That does not resolve anything medical or if you're no longer mobile ... but it's still a good step. And I have an interview for an elderly couple next week so I can start doing some PT elder-help paid work again, which I've taken a break from for many months now, since the old gent died and the two women became too ill for me to help. It'll do me good to work again, independence wise.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on January 14, 2020, 10:22:47 AM
I'm so glad the T appointment went well, Hops.  I was hoping it would.

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on January 14, 2020, 11:36:28 AM
(((((Tupp))))) -- We're on the same page!

One persistent interest of mine for years has been aging issues, including co-housing, shared housing, etc. I know a good deal about it. Unfortunately the only cohousing communities here (there are two) are too expensive for me. This area's very pricey even for that.

When I was still hoping to inherit my mother's big house one of my plans was to get two or three female friend roommates and create our own co-house for old age, pooling resources etc. But that didn't work out because of my brother (and the fact that my friends have their own plans and generally are better off). I checked out the other two as well. Then as I've talked about a lot here, I've helped elderly folks in independent apartments in old-age developments, and learned what they pay each month. Out of my reach.

But. There's a new nonprofit here I've begun to volunteer for that is based on healthy people (mostly in 60s or 70s) doing for free for frail elders exactly the kind of thing I've done for pay. Then, one day, if you need similar help so you can age in your home as long as possible, you can turn to this network for chores, drivers, shopping help etc -- at no charge. It's a brilliant concept that's already underway in some cities and I'm looking forward to working on it here.

That does not resolve anything medical or if you're no longer mobile ... but it's still a good step. And I have an interview for an elderly couple next week so I can start doing some PT elder-help paid work again, which I've taken a break from for many months now, since the old gent died and the two women became too ill for me to help. It'll do me good to work again, independence wise.

Hugs
Hops

I'm so glad, Hops, both about the paid work and the not for profit group; that sounds like a brilliant idea and I know for me just knowing there is 'someone' I can call is a big help, even if I don't need to call them.  I think the sense of aloneness is so hard to cope with, even if you don't actually need someone at the time.  I think having a network that people can call on is a great idea.

Your T does sound brilliant and I'm really happy that M is so engaged with the process and willing to work through things.  Hopefully he'll be able to pace himself a bit better so he doesn't whirl off into these spirals where he seems to lose contact with the rest of the world :)  I'm really glad you had an appointment quite quickly and that you've had your say!  It's great that it's all going so well in that regard.  I hope the cardio thing goes well tomorrow and gives you some reassurance xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on January 30, 2020, 06:36:10 PM
Thanks much, ((((Tupp)))).
The joint T sessions continue to go astonishingly well. I don't know if I'm testing the limits, but I have found myself both bold and extremely assertive (with zero animus) in these sessions...and observe both that the T "gets" me every time (we often exchange looks while M holds forth and I understand in the moment with no doubt that he understands) and that he consistently redirects M to what just happened (or didn't). It's kind of an exciting process and gives me lots of comfort and hope. It's kind of wonderful to have a T noticing my facial expressions and trusting they mean something.

Perhaps I'll say yes to M's next proposal with the contingency that he agrees to stay in or re-enter therapy with me any time I need it!

Meanwhile, I'm feeling calmer and more confident in the relationship with M. We went through another intense, kind of testing experience just now, that ended up with me feeling that I do know how to interact with him as part of a couple.

An endearing and delightful British scholar just arrived (like two weeks ago) for a semester in M's department as a visiting distinguished professor. I picked up him and his wife to take them to a dinner party at M's almost a week ago, and we bonded instantly over politics. The evening was lovely (they all spoke English the whole night which was a pleasure for me). And then I took them home, and afterward, he sent M and me a bunch of hysterical British satire videos about the current US president. It was fun and I was looking forward to getting to know him (and his sweet wife, A) over the next six months.

Two days ago he suddenly died of a heart attack at 4am. M left me messages and I went over and comforted her, took her on a long walk to a beautiful meadow near his place, and joined another woman comforting her throughout the evening. M was so grateful and appreciative of this and we both were deeply affected by her loss. She was beside herself (they'd been married 45 years). He dealt with all the practical complexities (except for me asking my lawyer how to reassure her about cremation even though his 20-year-old will, done in the U.K., expressed his desire to be buried)...and I was just support. But the whole thing has brought us even closer. Talking about deeper and more meaningful issues.

Because of this, I've been re-thinking my recent sense that I didn't want to take the "next trip" with him...to California again in March, for a long week with the kids/grandkids (shared rented house on the beach in Santa Barbara). Anyway, I was surprised to realize that after thinking I DON"T want to go anywhere again soon with him, I feel connected in a way that makes me more likely to want to go. The deadline (for him to cancel my ticket) is this Sunday, and I may surprise him by saying Yes.

All in all, I'd say we're in better shape than I thought. I weirdly feel more connected to him and also more connected to my desire to attend to my own life. Perhaps we'll figure out the balance.

Optimistically,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on January 31, 2020, 05:35:47 AM
Oh, Hops, I'm so sorry to read of that nice man's sudden passing, and how awful for his wife to lose him so suddenly like that.  I'm glad that you and M were there for her to support her both practically and emotionally, what an awful situation for all of you.

I am heartened to read that the therapy is going well and that this most recent event has made you feel closer to M.  I do think you get to see the real heart of people during a crisis and the fact that he stepped up to organise things and make sure the poor lady was okay is a good testament to his good heart, I think.  I feel the same about his continued commitment to therapy and I do feel that if he were putting on an act or a kind of 'I'll do this to keep her quiet' approach to it the cracks would be showing by now, but they aren't.  He seems sincere in his desire to be with you, and committed to working on himself to make that happen.  I think that's really encouraging and if you feel like this trip would be a good experience then go for it.  I like the fact that you feel you can change your mind and decide what to do when it suits you, rather than doing what suits everyone else.  I was really glad to read your post - there was so much in it that was positive, despite the fact there was such an unexpected bereavement in amongst it.

I am sorry for the poor chap and his wife but glad you were able to be there for her xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on January 31, 2020, 10:54:50 AM
So that's where you've been. 

(((Hops))) I'm so sorry you lost a new friend but glad you were able to comfort his wife. 

These things shift perspective, IME.  Making the most of the time we have left, knowing it might end tomorrow is a good thing.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on January 31, 2020, 12:53:00 PM
OH MY Hops. I'm glad you were able to be with your new friend during what is surely a time complicated by being away from home. I'd think that helped more than you will ever know.

Leads me to suggest perhaps it would be a good idea to carry those documents in digital format with you, when traveling out of the country. A thumb drive is small enough to get added to a jewelry pouch.

(((((Hops)))))
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on February 04, 2020, 10:42:38 AM
Great suggestion, Amber! Thanks.

I decided to skip the week-in-California with a houseful of kids and grandkids and am glad I am. He'll be out there first for a week for a lecture, then back for a week, then back out for their traditional boys' birthday week (the sons were born on the same day years apart). And M LOVES traditions. So I'll get to miss him for a week (while hopefully focusing on my own stuff), enjoy him being back for a week (we do happy reunions well), and enjoy another break after! I think it'll be a good thing for perspective. We still have a trip to Spain planned for April but agreed I could wait to commit until a month before departure, so he could get tickets refunded. I may ask him to just change it so we're not driving so much; simplify it to a week in one place and a week in another, instead of driving for hours every day to cover so much ground. Or I may just decide this isn't the year for so much travel for me.

Things are generally going a lot better, largely due to the T. M is listening, or trying strenuously to, and the T's observations really help. He told M yesterday that his 50-year habit of commenting is what he's been most rewarded for in his life, and because T has worked with many brilliant people in this university community, he's observed that M's issues with not dominating and struggling to listen are common among academics. He said, "You have rewarded all your life for what you say, but not for what you hear."

I thought that was brilliant. The other thing is I go in there and just unload in great detail about what I worry or have difficulty about with M, and how various behaviors of his (nonstop talk, not allowing silences, racing mind) affect me. And M really listens then, though one can see him struggle not to be composing his reply. The other thing I value a lot about what we're doing together is that he has never once given me any resentment or blowback about anything I bring up in T, no matter how bluntly. Sometimes he worries that I don't understand how much he loves me, and that his deep intention toward me is 100% and all that. But he also told me he knows that what I'm doing is trying to resolve anxieties I have about relationships and that he supports the process completely. I find that remarkable and reassuring.

The T also said to him, "When you listen to Hops, I notice that your eyes are busy moving all around." I mentioned that I'd brought up lack of eye contact early in our relationship. I think this T is picking up on some ADHD stuff and also the real impact for M of having an overactive mind. In scholarship and his career, it's been incredible. In relationship, it can present obstacles to intimacy.

Despite all that, I am feeling better about him. And closer to a sense that we really might make it long term.

One step at a time. One day at a time. We had a lovely dinner to celebrate the first anniversary of the day we met. He came with roses. Not hard to enjoy roses!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on February 04, 2020, 11:44:56 AM
Big smilie faces and hugs Hops.

Sounds like you're both finding a way forward.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on February 04, 2020, 06:02:29 PM
Hops:

It sounds like things are going along pretty well. I'm still loving your T.  Rewarded for what M says, not what he hears.... that makes sense.  I hope it helps M SEE. 

 You chose to skip the Cali trip... I think that was wise, particularly while you guys sort communication styles and habits.   

I'm going back a bit, but wonder what M criticized you about in the jungle, if not things like what you bring up in T sessions.  Were they logical things, or were they illogical?  You don't have to answer if it makes you uncomfortable.  I noticed you seem to be guarding the relationship a bit more.... which I see as positive for the relationship. 

Just an observation and not necessarily reality. 

Happy anniversary, Hops!  I love sticking my nose into roses..... smelling them.. feeling their cool soft petals on my face.

Lighter 

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on February 04, 2020, 10:33:27 PM
I'd say illogical, Lighter. He was reacting to emotional pressures he was feeling too.
I've come to understand a lot more about him since being with his family, seeing the intense load of expectations he's been under his whole life (and rebelled from), seeing the deep devotion and sense of duty he has to so many relatives, and seeing his inner conflict because he's more at home here (and in Europe) now, than there.

I think CR was destabilizing for him, and he was trying to defend an identity that's actually been shaken loose. But he couldn't articulate that at the time, and I was just struggling.

It sure as heck was destabilizing for me. A hard trip but a very valuable one. He seems so relieved that the condo in San Jose is gone, like one more tentacle has let him go. I look forward, if all goes well, to returning with him sometime. For a week, not three. And in a comfortable hotel instead of in two homes that were about his past and a whole different dream, now ended. He's now mentioned maybe selling the jungle house too. He told me today after his exercise class that he just wants to focus more on taking care of himself, enjoying simpler things, and taking care of me.

I can't even recall the exact things he picked at me about at the jungle house. And at this point, I'm not really worried about it any more. We've made such huge progress since. And, since one of your posts, I remember I always have a choice.

He's a good man. And he's working hard at learning some very very new material about the self. I'm more relaxed around him than I've been yet, because we're communicating better. And I do sense he's really looking inside in a way he never has before. We'll see how it goes....

Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on February 05, 2020, 07:31:56 AM
Hops:

You sound....
centered.

Just check yourself. 
Carefully.

No making excuses for bad behavior. 
No letting M get away with anything that's unacceptable. 
Call him on everything.... it seems you're keeping new T in the loop and utilizing him completely to that end.

Really wonderful trajectory, ((Hops.))

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on February 05, 2020, 09:01:44 AM
[
He's a good man. And he's working hard at learning some very very new material about the self. I'm more relaxed around him than I've been yet, because we're communicating better. And I do sense he's really looking inside in a way he never has before. We'll see how it goes....

Hops
[/quote]

Hopsie, I feel that he is very lucky to have met you after a lifetime of having to conform to other people's expectations and having to play that role of knowledgeable professor so constantly.  To meet someone who genuinely wants him to be able to talk about how he really feels, who doesn't need him to always be there, always be strong, always have an answer - I'm thinking it must be a relief for him that he doesn't have to wear that mask with you - although I can understand it may be a hard mask to remove after so many years of wearing it.  You must feel like an absolute breath of fresh air to him.

I love that fact that in your T sessions he listens and that he doesn't throw anything back at you afterwards, or sulk, or take the opportunity to say something mean just to get his own back.  I like that he doesn't hear your comments as a criticism that he has to tolerate, but as something for him to look at and think about - and I guess he knows the same is true of you, that he can say what he thinks and you'll tell him what you think, rather than what you think he wants to hear.  I wonder if he's ever had that before?

It is very heartening that you're able to tweak the holidays a bit to make them more manageable and just decide each time whether or not you want to go.  I'm glad you still feel able to just take it at its own pace and keep working through it.  I'm happy that it seems to be working out for you both :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on March 07, 2020, 10:43:33 AM
Well, I promised.

M and I are okay. But the Hard hard work is surfacing, as it needs to. Our T continues to be amazingly helpful and that's very hopeful.

What we've been processing lately has been super illuminating. It brings the personality gaps into relief and I am seeing what our challenge is. It really boils down to M having narcissistic traits (as I do too) that he doesn't realize. And me being so sensitized to every whiff of it that I get super stressed...because of how I'm wired. And yet -- M is NOT a pure-N, doesn't have NPD, isn't a bad person. He's just wired and trained to be self absorbed. A lot of that isn't the born personality as much as upbringing, in which he was the golden child, raised mostly by loving Central American servants, and when he came skipping in, everything stopped and he was smothered in praise and affection.

Our T once said to him, the way Hops describes your coming in and talking loudly and immediately and sowing kind of emotional chaos while you're shrieking giggles and getting the dog stirred up  no matter what is going on with her....it reminds me of a child coming home from Show and Tell at school. To my surprise, M said, that's exactly how I feel.

So now, I just suggest when he comes in with too much excitement and drama and destroys the peace, hey, let's be calmer...and he immediately turns it down. I do notice, persistently, that he listens hard and really tries to get it, to respond, to do better. That's why I still love him. Some times are harder than others, though.

It all came into relief during some house hunting (more looking to see what's out there, though we do seem to be stepping up the pace). Something unexpected happened that had an enormous impact on me. And the power dynamics of him having money and me not, came into very painful focus, which we are talking about with the T. (Thank god for him--he's so open to naming and seeing and recognizing what we're wrestling with. Whereas M, out of some guilt perhaps, has always minimized the important of those differences" class, money, privilege. So we couldn't talk about it very effectively, since he has such a hard time taking it in.)

Anyway, the realtor sent us a link and one look at the location and the pix, I was in love with it. Even before our tour. I emailed them both that I felt that way. It is a charming, lovely house with every conceivable space we'd need and perfect for aging in place, but still a warm, welcoming feel that felt like a hug when we walked in. Partly due to its charm and beauty, but also because it's on the street I learned to ride my bike on, behind my childhood home. Amazing. The street itself is perfect, 5 minutes from everything, no traffic, friendly neighbors, lovely old trees. Perfect.

So we're wandering through, soaking up the lovely, perfect spaces (including an addition with two walls of glass and a skylight, southern-facing for winter light, that blew me away)...and then I wandered upstairs to see where my study (the 3rd BR) would be. It was the perfect size. And then I looked out the window over the yard and saw it looked directly down the hill at my childhood home. It hit me like lightning. I had this sudden feeling: Writing here, I would be complete. This is HOME.
It's hard to explain but it was such a powerful feeling I nearly cried.

I go downstairs floating on the feeling, we've found it. As hard as it will be to leave my present house, in that one I knew, I would move tomorrow to live here. I was IN LOVE. Meanwhile, M was standing in the very pleasant open-plan kitchen obsessing over the lack of a granite top on the island and how "of course we have to update all the finishes and cabinets"--I liked the cabinets--and obsessing over every negative he could think of. The kitchen is lovely. There would be no emergency whatsoever about updating it if that's very important to him. But the bones oh the bones.

Anyway, later he began focusing on the cost, finding it overpriced. (And he'd just taking a big hit on the stock market, so that's totally understandable.) So we went back and forth about it all day. I asked him to let me contribute my retirement savings, that is how strongly I felt about it, and I meant it. He said oh no, etc. Meanwhile, the clock was ticking and because I know this town so well, including the market, I said to him and our realtor, this will be gone tomorrow. I knew. So all day we deal with the discussion and then, during our T session, M says he's willing to make an offer, and did. Sure enough, it was already under contract. It was a perfect gem, perfect for our lifestyle and aging needs...and perfect for me at a spiritual level. That sounds silly but it had hit me in that way like an earthquake. Yet not having money power, I was overruled. So THAT issue came into focus. I was just shattered. I wasn't going to fight about it, I ain't no gold-digger, but it was actually a painful loss.

I've never reacted that way. I've always been pragmatic and realistic about houses. I figured out later that the biggest part of it was that street, and that study window...with no connection to family now, I thought about how intensely I have always bonded to place, as I did as a little girl. THAT tree, THAT shrub, the way light comes through THAT window. I bond super-deeply to place. The unexpected revelation of how healing THAT place would be to me...blew me away. An actual loss.

Meanwhile, M explained to me that he looks at real estate PURELY as a financial transaction. His obsession (identified in T) is being certain he gets a "good deal." So even though he COULD afford it, he just didn't want to. His calculation said it was over-priced. Probably was. But I could have made up the difference from savings and the way he dismissed that option made me feel even more powerless.

All in all, I am glad we went through this. It was our first intense argument and it revealed a whole lot we need to be honest and adult about -- like bringing economic power imbalance right in front of our eyes, and examining how that will affect our relationship and how we're going to deal with it in the future.

Meanwhile, there's ANOTHER house on the very same street, even same side, that we're seeing on Monday. It's lovely and I could live there. It has the elegant finishes and historic aura (1920s) that M loves, all the spaces we'd need, and will cost even more than the previous one. But to M, space that impresses is important. Just a fact of his raising and I'm not going to shame him about it. To me, I want a house, however gracious or spacious, that feels like a hug when you walk in (as the other one did). He wants a house that will put you in awe of the owner (as this one might).

That won't be me. And that's the reality.

Heavy stuff, but necessary. And I feel that if he falls in love with the new house on that street, it's a compromise I should embrace. (Don't like the back yard as it's too shady and steep, but I'll make letting me have trees taken out my only condition.)

There you go....and here we are. Thanks for listening.

love,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on March 07, 2020, 12:59:44 PM
Aw, Hops, well, I'm glad you're still plugging away at things and that T continues to be so helpful but I'm sorry that M wasn't able to see how perfect this was for you and just go along with it.  If it were an investment or a business opportunity then I could understand the reluctance but as it's to be a forever home for you both it doesn't seem to me that paying a wee bit more (and it can't have been that overpriced if someone else snapped it up that quickly) should be a problem.  And yes, I get the financial inequality bit, it's things like this where it really shows and it would knock me off my perch a bit.  But - I'm glad you're talking it through and I'm glad he's listening when you tell him to calm down a bit and not get Pooch overexcited.  And I hope the other place ticks enough boxes for both of you.  Glad you have been able to update, I've been wondering how you were getting on :) Lots of love xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on March 07, 2020, 01:16:55 PM
Oh, Hops... my heart broke a little when you didn't get your warm hug house. 

I don't know what to say to that.  It seems a fundamental necessity in this equation for your comfort in the relationship.  A priority.  M's pragmatic view of property ownership is understandable, but... at what cost in THIS situation.   

I'll have to think about that, bc I have experiences that likely color my views.

The T sounds like he keeps getting more and more helpful. 

It's nice M can shift gears, hear other people and try to make things OK for you too. 

Maybe that first contract will fall through.  Maybe you guys could have a backup contract in place, ready to go.

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on March 08, 2020, 08:38:28 AM
Oh Hops... I've been on both sides of the money-power issue. And had the exact same "house" difficulty to deal with.
I'm with Lighter - contact the realtor and ask to be notified if there are any problems with the first contract.

Its another type of assertiveness; to stand your ground on what you want. Since when does impressing others outweigh feeling at "home"? Especially starting over as an older couple? Maybe this time, it's M's turn to "give a little" so you can have your heart's desire?

That bond with place... I know pretty well too. The beach just wasn't it for me.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on March 08, 2020, 12:12:59 PM
Thanks, Lighter. You got it, entirely. Empathy helps! At one point, when we left the T's office, I looked at him and said, I don't think you understand how raw I feel. And he looked into my eyes and I saw it hit him. He immediately contacted the realtor to make an offer. Even though it was too late, I did see that he was upset when he finally took in how I felt. It mattered to him. Our challenge is getting him to be more able to listen to me in the moment. Even now and then would be encouraging, because with his racing mind, it sure won't be constant. And that's okay. To a degree.

Amber, and both--the realtor knows. It was an all-cash contract and has been ratified, so I don't think there's much chance. But if it collapses she'll notify us.

I'm feeling gradually more peace about it. I do think M made a mistake, as it hurt me a lot and will haunt me for a while. But also, I needed to understand his anxiety. Even though he has a lot of money, he's just lost a third of what he's built over his lifetime. That has to be a huge shock. I haven't even looked at my wee investment portfolio. I am incapable of stock picking and reallocating with enough sophistication to stop the plunge, so why torture myself. Frugality is my only answer and fortunately, it doesn't scare me. I had one parent whose family was very poor, and I saw how resourceful people can be.

In addition, once M and I do set up a home together, I'll have a small rental income from my present home added to my social security. So I'll be able to save a bit more.

I'll learn something Monday, if M's attitude while we encounter the new places we're looking at, shifts a bit. I think it might, or he might remain in mogul-mode. That to me is just marching through a space without a pause to check...how does it feel to you? The good thing is we'll be at the T right before that appointment. I'm going to ask that we come to some understanding of how M is right to examine everything from a cost perspective, but how I would also like to be asked, included, in terms of my own sense of whether this could feel like home. Whether I can see "happy" there.

Fingers crossed!

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on March 08, 2020, 12:28:56 PM
That sounds like win-win compromise to me, Hops. I don't care how good a deal a property is - if it doesn't "feel" right to the person you want to share it with - that $$$$$ isn't going to make any difference long term.

There are robins here today.  :D
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on March 10, 2020, 01:50:25 AM
Thanks, Amber.
Simple, but truly you're right...it's the bottom line.

We saw the other house (same magical street) today and M really likes it.
I don't feel that "madly in love" feeling but could be happy there. It's very charming.

Smaller and less adaptable spaces than the first one, but we could make it work.
My piano would take up 1/4 of the living room, and he'd have to leave his ancient
one behind or put it in the basement (it's unplayable). So...dunno how that would fly. Fortunately the house is not even on the market yet, so there's not an intense rush to make decisions. I'm kind of stepping back to see what M wants to do, give him space to think. We could suddenly be under the gun to decide but at least right now, not.

It was a heavy day but, to me, a beneficial one. At T we dug deeper into what I'd experienced at the first house (they both got how emotional it was), and he shared more about what he feels overall in the present -- completely upside-down with a combo of anxiety (the market collapse), and grief over impending losses after wife's death (then professor friend, then his brother's dire diagnosis, and just yesterday, another relative diagnosed with the same deadly cancer --pancreatic-- that took his wife). Overall, our talk uncovered for me that underneath all the privilege and bluster, M is scared. The coronavirus is kind of a capper for him because for the first time in 40 years, he's not going to be with his sons to celebrate their birthday (same day, seven years apart; being with them then has been an annual thing since his oldest son's birth nearly 40 years ago). But because of the virus, he's not going back to California again this month. There are six cases in the town the kids live in, and they're scared too.

Right decision but it's just shaken M, who is feeling overwhelmed with change, past losses, upcoming losses...and literally, the meaning of life and death. I'm glad we talked so much and both listened better. I can see he's in a fairly dark place. As an uprooted man who's never quite been sure where he belongs, the threat of change and certainty of loss and fear of meaninglessness and death are peaking for him right now.

I get it. And oddly I feel pretty steady, not spiraling out myself. I have fears too but am seeing that although I can't predict the realities of my older age, I am safe now, and warm, and do have friends. I still want to wind up with M if as we work together in T these realizations continue to make us feel closer. But if I don't, I will remember that I got along without him before I met him. It was lonely at times, but I was living.

What I want to do for now is be supportive to him, not push him too hard, continue my own path and growth and time with him, and see what happens. We both have a lot on our plates and I've neglected my own life (writing, progress with home issues) since we met. That's on me (laziness, avoidance, plus ADD) and predated meeting him.

Live and learn is what I'm saying to myself. Live, and learn.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on March 10, 2020, 04:01:50 AM
Aw, Hops.  I just want to give you both a big hug.  No arse kicking for M now :)  Maybe the house buying can take a back seat for a while?  It's a stressful business and as you're both raw at the minute, albeit for different reasons, maybe you could put it to one side for a while longer?  Just let things settle a bit, emotion and money wise?  Hugs to you both xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on March 10, 2020, 07:37:05 AM
That's my instinct, Tupp. And thanks for the hugs.
I think it's premature and with a huge chance prices will drop enormously coming up (virus and economy), it might make more sense to wait.

I still have the same security fears of old age, and moving in and marrying will take care of those. But we might go about our plans in better shape after some more months of counseling together. For now, I'm just going to wait and see what he says.

Didn't sleep all night for all the churning in my head, but on some level, also calmed down a bit.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on March 10, 2020, 09:11:26 AM
Hops, I'm glad you appreciate seeing what is underlying M's frustrating and sometimes scary behaviors. Your famous compassion will guide you the right way, I'm sure. All while looking out for yourself. He's lucky, in that this is such a strong part of you.

The fact that you are BOTH working on it - from your respective roles/boundaries - is excellent; I think it's what we hold in common as the "ideal" of a partnership. You're giving him the time/space to resolve it for himself. With love & compassion. That's a big gift. I think you're right to go back to "Hops' space" for a bit... and maybe tidy things up there and relax a bit.

I will surmise a little bit: and say I think that there are differences in how men/women process and finally accept the big reality of life - that of certain, but hopefully only eventual death. There are variations out the wazoo - depending on the person's past experience and ego/personality quirks.

My management style, means for me, that planning for eventualities gives me some peace of mind. Even while admitting that the "plan" has to have flexibility for the things that a person simply can't see ahead of time. Dealing with that uncertainty - to me - is the hardest bit. The scariest. But having faced it in the not to distant past, dead on, is how I came to find that I have a deep well of TRUST. In exactly WHAT, I don't have clue one. I just trust that everything will be OK - even when it's NOT OK.

And I have no idea whether that's just some naive belief left over from my weird childhood... or what it is. It's certainly not something I can rationally defend as being logical. I just know it's as real as anything else in my life.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on March 10, 2020, 12:35:07 PM
That's my instinct, Tupp. And thanks for the hugs.
I think it's premature and with a huge chance prices will drop enormously coming up (virus and economy), it might make more sense to wait.

I still have the same security fears of old age, and moving in and marrying will take care of those. But we might go about our plans in better shape after some more months of counseling together. For now, I'm just going to wait and see what he says.

Didn't sleep all night for all the churning in my head, but on some level, also calmed down a bit.

Hugs
Hops

I understand the insecurities around some of the things Hops, but also know (from doing it many times!) that moving into the wrong place can be a costly and very expensive mistake.  You could maybe just keep your eyes open and if exactly the right thing comes up, you both love it, it's the right price and so on then great - but maybe put searching and viewing and really trying slightly to one side for now.  And like you say, you might find prices drop so you could end up getting something really lovely for less than you'd pay for it now.  I'm glad you're working things out and glad M is able to say what is troubling him like that - I think that says a lot of good things about him xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on March 10, 2020, 04:01:33 PM
Thanks, ((((((Amber)))))))).
I loved every word of your post.

I think you've doomed me, as I'm now addicted to Outlander.
Who KNEW? (It finally came to Netflix.)
Now that I am reminded of parallel universes (with hot Scots), this one is much less scary.
I'm connecting with my irrational TRUST too.
Because I don't think rationality is all there is.

Thanks, you.

And ((((Tupp))), I think I'm on the right page after all.
I think house-hunting right now is not sensible.
M's just lost a huge hunk more, and shoving ahead with a buy and a move would be nuts.
We're okay.

I'm mostly ready to hunker down.
I could stay in my house for a month or two without starving.
Didn't stock up a TON but have enough to stave off fear.

Staying home is cozy.
I'm not ready to go move in temporarily to do it with M (he tends to go out almost daily)...but we're in good touch.

His thoughts are just do scholarship; isolation will be okay.
Mine are Clean Up the ****ing House; isolation will be okay.

I think there's a chance folks will rediscover the delights of the telephone.

For some reason I'm just a lot calmer now.

love y'all,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on March 10, 2020, 04:56:30 PM
Hops:

I'm so with you regarding cleaning up/out the house... I'm ready to fill the truck over and over and hit the GOODWILL.  I have zero desire to have a garage sale.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on March 31, 2020, 09:21:38 PM
Time for an update, I figure.

Had dinner at M's the other evening. We went for a walk and then ate on his deck. I only went indoors to pee and wiped down everything I'd touched with a disinfectant wipe. Easy. Pooch was more excited to see him than I was! (M and I'd had a nice walk and talk date a week ago, winding up in my back yard.)

Having settled back into my usual solitude for the last three weeks (except for very nice breaks of outdoor socializing)...I've had time and focus to think more about this relationship. I'm still in it, not quitting so far, and we're doing therapy which is great anyway.

But.

I've started to think that one reason M was so easy for me to get involved with was that his sparkly, entertaining, show-offy, demanding, conversation domination and self-absorbed incessantness is very like my Nmother's. I was raised and trained to placate, please and cope with that kind of behavior. I dread labeling it, but the Nword is in my head.

I've been reflecting on a lot of stuff about him that isn't coming up feeling good. There's still the fun and charming and at times generous stuff. I will talk about that again I'm sure. But right now, I'm allowing myself to look pretty plainly at things I seriously dislike. And ponder what that may mean. NOT making a decision right now; just feeling wary of plunging farther or faster down the road. And that's a good thing. In my life, rushed romance and premature commitments have always, always backfired.

I dislike it when M is passive-aggressive. Example: I've explained to him at least six times that although I understand that it's a courteous ritual he was raised with, I do not want him to "top off" or automatically refill my wineglass. If I decide I want more, I prefer to pour it myself. That's because wine tempts me, I know when I should stop, and M is more likely to want to carry on beyond my own limit. (And perhaps he enjoys treating me as a "drinking buddy.") So, at dinner, at one point he comes up behind me and SWIFTLY refills my glass. I didn't react immediately as I should have (it's tiring to be on max-reflex) so didn't object.

But I resented it. A small thing maybe, but another example of him deliberately marching over a boundary I'd set very clearly. It's as though having shared a vulnerability with him (I can be tempted to have more wine than I really should) -- that he took advantage of it.

Another. I've asked him not to call me after 9pm because I have severe insomnia and he tends to offload a lot of dire, anxious or forbidding or tragic comments about news or this or that, and then he's all sleepy and content, and I'm riled up from the exchange and can't sleep. A few nights back he calls me at 1030pm, yakking on in a similar vein. Same thing. He wants the comfort of my voice at bedtime and I absolutely resent that expectation. I'm not his mommy, it's deleterious for me, and I'd like him to respect my boundary.

The upshot is that even though I have a couple of close friends with whom I have the understanding that we are to each other a person you could call in an emergency any time of the day or night, I have to leave the ringer off all night because I cannot trust M to respect my wishes.

I withdrew today, quietly, after emailing him (and explaining nicely on the phone) that I just need to retreat and think. So just now I get an email from him full of a dire local projection about the virus, and he goes through this weird explanation of how he didn't know if he should tell me about it or not but felt that he "must" -- and it's another evening scary-news report. So he still manages to do that thing...even not on the phone. Upsets me either way.

The reason this kind of excuse-to-do-what-I-want-no-matter-what-you've-told-me-about-your-needs upsets me and riles me up is that I feel disrespected and overruled. He has done it before in many ways and I'm starting to just feel fed up. Partly virus irritability, but real.

Is as though in his cute, subtle, clever ways....he's passively needling me, poking at vulnerabilities, poke poke poke.

I've settled into my solitude more lately and he senses it. So we may just go through another round of this stuff. Which I loathe. I just don't want to have to battle my partner. There are men out there who will not needle, passive-aggress, and be infantile sometimes.

He wrote me the other night and closed his email (flattery) with a challenge:
"Will you keep being my conversation companion forever? (Answer now, with no equivocation!). [The last was a demand.]

I wrote back, nicely to the first part. Then wrote, "We can talk about your ultimate questions, but not on email." He wrote back, "We will TALK on Thursday!" I just didn't like his tone.

That's about it. I'm just weary of him right now. Doesn't mean I can't recover or we can't. But I am not enjoying comfort or support and feel it's mostly, almost all the time, ALL about him. I'm starting to toy with thoughts about other old fish in the sea, or even, given the pandemic...is it really going to be worth it to tie myself long-term to someone this immature.

Sigh. Thanks for listening.

Hugs to all,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on March 31, 2020, 09:45:24 PM
Left off a big piece that stuck in my chest.
We were talking about my D with the T (which was extremely difficult for me). M described me to the T as "so hyper-sensitive" about her and said that at one point I was "spiraling...". He was looking so innocent but I felt it was gaslighting.

I'm going to address this in our next session. What sent a chill for me was that he often described his ex-wife as "crazy." That, in my understanding, is a CLASSIC way that some men denigrate women for having powerful emotions or getting upset. I intend to spell out that I do not accept that framing about me and will not let it pass.

I am BOTH sensitive and strong. I do have powerful emotions on some subjects, and have to set boundaries when someone is insensitive about that loss, but I am not hysterical nor irrational. I have never yelled or thrown anything or done anything unhinged whatsoever, even when talking about the most painful subject in my life.

So to have him begin "narrating me" to our therapist that way created a dark spot in my feelings for him.

I think the bottom line is, I don't fully trust him emotionally. On the surface he is mostly charming. In his core he is a decent person. But he's developed behavioral habits because of lack of insight...that concern me.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on April 01, 2020, 04:09:51 AM
Aw, Hops, I really understand that 'crazy' label.  It's a very destabilising and it demeans very real and relevant feelings and experiences.  I've had it thrown at me many times when I've stood up for my son.  We all have things we are sensitive about and when it comes to our children (big or small) of course we are sensitive, we love them and that pain with you D is so intense you would need to be made of stone not to feel it.  But I agree, him labelling it that way is inappropriate and a real shame, I think, that he's making that your problem instead of perhaps looking at his own need to poke around in that area when you've clearly explained to him not to.

And yes, it chimes with the other things you've said about him not respecting your boundaries, calling late in the evening to fill your head so he can empty his own and so on.  I'm sorry.  I think these crisis times do give us time to reflect and think (and sometimes remind us how much we like our own company as well).  I'm glad you're seeing it even though it's painful to see.  It's very easy to gloss over the less than pleasant bits when so many other things work well but you always pull the drawer out and check underneath it.  I really admire you for that.  I'm glad you feel able to discuss it with T next time you go in.  Is this still the nice T that has been so helpful so far? xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on April 01, 2020, 08:36:20 AM
Ya know Hops, I think often I overlook those small things... BECAUSE, instead of my guy always needing me to provide that emotional security - he's offering it to me. And it's VERY different from what I'm used to.

"Security" meaning I can trust him not to call so late my sleep is messed up; not ordering me around as if I'm chattel... boundaries/routines respected and worked with. Mike did pretty well with that, even if he WAS exceptionally needy - he wasn't selfish; Buck is better. He pays attention to my routines and is very considerate.

It sounds like you're describing the balance of emotional support given/asked for within the circle of the two of you. And something just isn't working... after a year, and even T. It's just me, but if after that much time - it's still the very same thing bugging you - it's something that isn't going to change; it'll always be there. Maybe you can learn to love that too... maybe you just can't.

The high priestess, the exalted (and humble!) Amber gives you permission to learn to live with his habits, or perhaps expand your horizons... or even do nothing for a little bit... including perhaps, restating your boundaries and standing firm without worrying about HIS feelings in reaction to that.

:insert magic wand sparkles:
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on April 01, 2020, 11:33:32 AM
::stepping into Amber's magic sparkle dust::.

I think Amber's right.

This is going to be about you, Hops, changing how you view M's behaviors rather than M learning to change all the things pinging off warning bells and reminding you of your mother's behaviors....  "the law of contagion"... our minds using context to connect things and provide meaning through our amygdala.  M's doomed if your brain interprets his behaviors with all reactivity your mother's behaviors built through the years, IMO.

This, for me, ties into a video I watched recently about what global THING everyone on the planet fears.  I won't spoil it for you, but it ties into this thread.... at least in my Lighter view of things.  Think Pavlov's dogs here.  Here's the link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Vmwsg8Eabo

I wish I'd had access EMDR sessions throughout my life.  To see what's in front of me, with clarity, would have been a priceless gift. 

Having access to that gift feels like magic wand sparkles to me.

Lighter




Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 01, 2020, 11:56:35 AM
Thank you, Tupp. Very much.
I really appreciate your understanding my sensitivity to how he uses words...it just disturbed me. If M is a true N, then oh so "reasonably" laying down labels and descriptions that are sabotage-y like that, is classic. One reason it really got to me, how he began describing me to the T last time, was it reminded me of when I was in the ER after the stroke, still able to communicate although haltingly, M was telling my friend that I didn't know what I wanted because I was "very confused." Using his wise-professor voice and authoritative persona. Those things have gaslight written all over them, in my book. And again, it's a question of how do I feel about him when I am vulnerable? Do I really feel safe being vulnerable around M?

There is no more vulnerable subject in my life than my D. Talking about her in his presence I am filled with fear and dread of being manipulated. So...I think the truth is, I'll need to give up all hope of him helping her as he had often trumpeted he was so eager to do. I think he simply can't do it without angling for psychological advantage for himself in the process. If I say, okay, that's not happening, subject closed again, I think that his choice will fester in me as a power move ("I don't want to jump through Hops' hoops to do that"--meaning when I gave him the simple steps that would be okay with me for him donating to her fundraiser) that ultimately has denied her help. Right now, she's desperate again online, begging for money for meds. I shouldn't have looked.

And I'm resenting him for it. He has bragged to me recently how wonderful it feels to send big checks to his sons. It just seems colossally insensitive to me, given that he knows about D and at least at one time, was boasting about how he wanted to help her. This is where money and entitlement and power issues (and oh Lord, possibly N-ism) intersect. My fiercely awake self would prefer to die poor but proud, rather than cope with that. Then my scared self wakes up and says, fool! You'd be SAFE if you commit to him for life! This whole renewed discussion we broached with the joint-T last week has brought back up the question in me, safe maybe, but at what cost?

Then again, I am aware that although I've been full of cheer and hope and positivity as best I can, yesterday the virus and what is happening in various places really got to me for the first time. So I'm always ready to doubt myself, and ask...is this just existential fear, and am I being fair to M? Then I went and read another article on Nism in Psychology Today and being honest with myself, he fit 5 out of 7 things described to a T.

That has set off a whole new debate with myself about my capacity to be intentional and willing to risk life alone again, if M is indeed an N. It's a tough call and I don't want to decide immediately. Especially if "virus stress" has distorted my perceptions.

I'm going to talk with my personal T today about all this, in an online session. She's very kind and smart and supportive. I think she's pretty skeptical about M. What she said most recently about him was that she feels I've been very very patient with him and in her view I've allowed him to get away with a lot, because I'm so focused on his needs, understanding and empathizing with him, etc.

It's people who are deeply fair, deeply honest and so forth, plus emotionally responsive, who often get sucked into the backwash with Ns, I believe. I would hate to get back into that old cycle as I spent much of my life coping with my Nmother's disability and later my Daughter's. But I'm older and scareder and am tempted by security. Right now I'm confused and scared and ambivalent.

Maybe it's just a cycle, triggered by the pandemic, and maybe it'll be okay, and I'll be back on describing how absolutely wonderful and delightful M has just become again. Very possible.

Thanks much again.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 01, 2020, 12:06:16 PM
Amber, thank you for this:

Quote
if after that much time - it's still the very same thing bugging you - it's something that isn't going to change; it'll always be there. Maybe you can learn to love that too... maybe you just can't.

It's just a succinct, reality-based description of where I am. This is exactly what I need to sit with...perhaps more calmly than I've done for the last day and evening! I do have a T, I do have friends, I do have you guys. I don't need to assume I will fall apart.

And this too:

Quote
permission to learn to live with his habits, or perhaps expand your horizons... or even do nothing for a little bit... including perhaps, restating your boundaries and standing firm without worrying about HIS feelings in reaction to that.

These really are my choices. Thanks for stating them so clearly. It really helps.

Mega hugs,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 01, 2020, 01:37:46 PM
I hear you, Lighter:

Quote
This is going to be about you, Hops, changing how you view M's behaviors rather than M learning to change all the things pinging off warning bells

There's a little bit of unreality in that for me, though. It'll take some time and some more months of single-T and joint-T sessions, probably. But what I am asking my wisest inner self (hellloooo! please come back sooooon!) is this: If M's behaviors ARE warning bells of the personality disorder I was raised to be drawn to and most dread, then perhaps I should NOT change how I view his behaviors.

If I am over-reacting (layering it over Nmother trauma memories as you astutely mention) then you are right. My goal then would be to de-escalate it and remove its "charge." In my own T work and inner work. So I can stay with M.

It's not really a binary choice. My challenge, I believe, would be to find out how deeply and how much his N-ish (I am VERY confident using that adjective, with the "ish") behavior distresses me because of its emotional impact on me. Are we truly a good fit?

If it bothers me only a little now and then, and I should look at it with fond benevolence--oh, the little Nboy is acting out, I don't have to react...then the answer's pretty easy. Most of the time I enjoy his company, even though I find him extremely self absorbed. Maidenly [edit: Maddeningly! I HATE AUTOCORRECT! LOL!] , at times.

If it bothers me so much it shakes me to the core and keeps me awake all night (has quite a few times), maybe I do have to react proactively in my own self-interest. When I feel strong I can fight for myself. Then there are times I wish I didn't HAVE to be so strong, to be in this relationship. I'd like to feel safe just being however I feel, with him.

My goal isn't so much to be right or in control of everything, as it is to be wise. One friend I've talked about it with sees how much I do NOT want to live on guard, always strategizing my emotional safety, tense about defending boundaries he ignores, and ever-ready to detour around his passive-aggressive stuff during times of tension. There are simply times, particularly as I age, when I would be quite vulnerable to his attitudes and his choices. And I want to be wise around whether M is someone I can trust with my vulnerability long-term.

So far, even after a year and a month, I'm not sure. But it ain't over. I am pretty convinced this is not about the pandemic, but sure as hell is converging with that fear too.

Just called him as he'd asked. This usually happens when I place the call. He answers hello? And immediately, instantly, launches into a long monologue of whatever he's stored up. It can go on nonstop for 10-15 minutes. Eventually, he remembers to ask about me. I am not sure how interested he actually is, but he manages that courtesy better than he used to.

What I remember, growing up with them-thar fancy telephones...was an etiquette that, when someone calls YOU, you say Hello, and then how are you? Or, what's going on? Or such. IOW, a person calls someone to speak to them. With M, the unwritten rule is, someone calls me so I can speak to THEM, and he instantly launches into it. So he speaks first and most, and I get to tag on my own story sometimes, and shorter.

Oh, so familiar. You're right about that!

Hugs
Hops

PS She also said something that surprised me: that the widespread belief that people who are Ns or have many N-behaviors never ever change, is based on old research. That was an optimistic thought. NOT (hah) that M would have a wholesale personality transplant (I wouldn't want that anyway) but that she doesn't automatically assume he could never change any of his most triggering behaviors toward me. He is highly motivated to make our relationship last (even more than I am, because I am willing to leave). And I think she was suggesting that it's perhaps more useful to think about him in terms of him being profoundly insecure, rather than fixate on the N term. (She mentioned his deep insecurity. Not that I can't ever use the N ism vocabulary, but that other language for what he does is insecurity. I will find out if he can practice empathy, at least enough of it, with me.)

The couples-T, the Sikh, is kind enough to come to my back yard tomorrow, to do an outdoor session with us on my private back patio, since M has declared he feels "unsafe" going into the office building. I told her I had wondered whether it was really the virus he was scared of, or was it continuing a challenging conversation we had last time. She instantly said she thought it was the latter. I do too, but since M had already met with me in my back yard, and I assured him he would always be six feet away from the T, and he would be touching nothing the T had touched, he was safe. I think he has no excuse to wiggle out of it, so he's coming.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 01, 2020, 03:12:50 PM
Just unloaded it all with my own T, with an online session (which I find surprisingly intimate, because our faces are closer....works really well for me). She is so supportive. Her main message was that she trusts me, that I'm seeing clearly and asking myself the right questions, and describing behaviors (his and mine) accurately.

I told her I am trying to figure out if I'm judging him as though through a screen or ghost of my mother, or whether I can see the good and sweet and especially motivated sides of him, and see him as LESS N-ish than she was.

She followed all of it, which is great. She said she will always offer any insights she feels might help, but that for now what she feels is more than labeling or diagnosing as much as she is in supporting me in experiencing and telling my own story, which she responds to as "a lot" but also meaningful and worth deep attention. She expresses confidence that I will find resolution that is right for me; she doesn't tell me what that resolution will be.

That makes sense to me, and I do feel very supported.

The difference between the T and you guys is that you guys don't get paid. And that's totally UNFAIR. Because the thinking and insights and support you so generously give me here are worth a truckload of face masks.

Thanks from the heart,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on April 01, 2020, 03:26:44 PM
Aw, Hops.  It's tough.  There's such a delicate balance, I think, between no relationship being perfect, we all have to give and take, compromise is inevitable, and so on, and then that often subtle descent into what might become, at best, an unhappy relationship and, at worst, something bordering on abusive (at least from an emotional point of view).  My thoughts, for you to take or leave as you see fit, of course:

I do get your points about the difficulty M seems to have with respecting your boundaries (many different examples).  I also see that he's undertaken the therapy and does seem to be trying to work on himself.  But then when you mention that he is topping up your wine glass (when you've asked him not to), calling you late in the evening (when you've asked him not to), calling you hyper-sensitive about your D (I see that as his issue rather than yours.  You are, understandably, in a very difficult situation when it comes to your D and all you asked of him was to respect that you find it very painful to talk about and so not to delve too deeply in to that.  That's very healthy, on your part, and it's a shame that he doesn't see it in that way).  I feel the same way that Skep does - if he's still doing it, maybe it will just always be how he is.  Deeply ingrained behaviour that he can't quite shake off.  Old habits and all that.

I did notice you mentioned him 'bragging' about the cheques he sends to his sons, rather than him just mentioning it.  I thought the fact that he comes across as bragging was quite telling.  I understand your need or desire for a safe and comfortable retirement and I truly do get that.  Although I'm younger than you, I have no pension, savings or capital and am unlikely to achieve any of those things before retirement age without a lottery win or a best selling novel (written whilst I'm asleep by fairies or something).  So I completely, completely understand the worry of being alone and fairly skint.  I also worry that you might end up not being emotionally safe if your fears about M do turn out to be right, and also if even the fact that he does have a good income would work well for you?  You've mentioned him not seeming to be willing to help D out now (and I'm sorry she's struggling again.  It's heartbreaking that she goes through this and only natural that you peek from time to time).  You also had the house 'thing' the other week where he just said no when he could have said yes.  And I'm thinking about the holiday where you ended up in the jungle house with him being pretty difficult?  So I'm not sure that even financial safety is something you could be sure of?  It sounds as if it might be a source of difficulty as things go along.

I do think that at times like this - with scary viruses and knowing your D is not doing too well again - we can ramp up fears and anxieties and they become bigger than they would be without the other things going on.  But I also think that, when we go through tough times, the people in our lives should be a port in the storm in those situations - a voice of calm, some reassurance, some practical support, etc - and not another situation we have to deal with.  It does trouble me that you're not currently thinking "I'm so glad I've got M while the world is crumbling around us" and instead you're thinking, "I must switch my phone off so he doesn't rile me up so much I can't get to sleep".

I don't think you've over-reacted to any of the things that have happened - if anything I agree with your T that you've been very patient and very committed to talking, reaching agreements, stating your boundaries and so on.  I don't think it matters really whether M is an N or if you are over responding to what he does because I think we've all got our 'things' we carry with us.  But it does matter whether or not you are a good fit and I agree with your friend that you don't want to have to be on your guard and to keep defending your boundaries.  I find that 'being talked at for fifteen minutes' thing exhausting and to be honest I avoid people who do that now.  It's just too tiring and I do think it's about them, because you can't get a word in.  I used to have a friend (I don't really talk to her anymore) who could talk for an hour like that - literally just deliver a monologue.  I used to think I could just put the phone on the side and go and have a bath and she wouldn't know.  It's tiring.

What I think is really, really, really good is that you don't have to make any decisions one way or another for months yet, Hopsie, even years if need be.  There is no reason for you not to carry on seeing him (when you want to), taking time out (if you want), seeing couples T, speaking to your own T, and so on, for really as long as you need.  I do think there will come a point when you do just know.  Something inside figures it out while our brains run around, I think.  But it is very hard and I do feel for you.  I would love you to meet a male version of yourself that you could just be with and that be that.  Maybe Buck had a brother? :)  Lol I hope the T session was helpful and gave you some clarity xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on April 01, 2020, 03:28:08 PM
And I think you posted the T update as I was writing I hope it went well and it looks like it did!  Lol xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 01, 2020, 05:30:37 PM
It did, Tupp.

Thanks so much again for all the reassurance and understanding. I felt very heard.

And I'm drained but feel ready for the Sikh's visit here tomorrow.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on April 01, 2020, 05:41:42 PM
Hang in there Hops!

It's my opinion, that you deserve to have a relationship that you feel - even when vulnerable - safe in. Maybe there's a way for M to hear that and then work backwards to how specific things he does causes you concern about that.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on April 01, 2020, 06:39:25 PM
I hear you, Lighter:

Quote
This is going to be about you, Hops, changing how you view M's behaviors rather than M learning to change all the things pinging off warning bells

There's a little bit of unreality in that for me, though. It'll take some time and some more months of single-T and joint-T sessions, probably. But what I am asking my wisest inner self (hellloooo! please come back sooooon!) is this: If M's behaviors ARE warning bells of the personality disorder I was raised to be drawn to and most dread, then perhaps I should NOT change how I view his behaviors.  I believe that too, Hops.  To clarify... I believe you should see what is true and what isn't true about M WITHOUT the old warning bells and red flags of your history pinning your nose to ever pebble and tree so you can't see the forest or field.  I want you to see the filed and forest, and not ONLY the pebbles and trees.  Does that make sense?

Whatever decisions you make... they should be rooted in the present, not in your history. 

If M is your mother, is an N, is toxic.... then that is what he is.

If M is in pain, suffering..... unable to control some of his actions, bc he's human like the rest of us..... if his struggle isn't your mother's struggle, isn't her actions, isn't really THAT.... you should see that clearly.  Whatever its...  I want you to see the truth, calmly, without judgment..... without past or future or ego involvement.
 


If I am over-reacting (layering it over Nmother trauma memories as you astutely mention) then you are right. My goal then would be to de-escalate it and remove its "charge." In my own T work and inner work. So I can stay with M.  Whether you choose to stay with M or not stay.... taking that charge out of your limbic system is something you're worthy of, and can have for yourself.
 It's not about M or seeking out old struggles..... it's about how you SEE, what you see..... CAN you see what's true in your present moment, free of fear and experiences?  I know you can do that, but IME it takes some magic wand dust, gaining spaciousness..... coming to our senses....... and looking at everything without judgment.  If this IS repeating old struggles, and M IS toxic then that's what is true.  If M is a suffering human being, reminding you of your mother bc of experiences, but just a human being pinging off old alarm bells that AREN'T really about him.... then that's the truth.  Maybe all the negative emotions that pop up will dissolve and you'll feel patience and relief instead of dread, worry, doubt, and frustration.  I have no idea.

What I do know is the work is ours.  Learning to SEE with clarity is helpful and good and feels true.  The fear, anxiety, and ego involvement stuff feels sketchy and temporary, IME. Living in our limbic system isn't truth or reality and it's OK to just BE there, notice when we're there, come to our sense and come to the real truth.  Whatever it is. 

I do feel identifying M's behaviors as your "mother's" behaviors, as "N".... is telling a story and it's a big scary story, IMO.  What do you see if you identify M as a human being, product of all his experiences, flawed and suffering..... what do you see as truth for him, for you, between you? 
 


It's not really a binary choice. My challenge, I believe, would be to find out how deeply and how much his N-ish (I am VERY confident using that adjective, with the "ish") behavior distresses me because of its emotional impact on me. Are we truly a good fit?  I don't know, but I trust you to gain some distance, center yourself in your body and figure that out for yourself. 

If it bothers me only a little now and then, and I should look at it with fond benevolence--oh, the little Nboy is acting out, I don't have to react...then the answer's pretty easy. Most of the time I enjoy his company, even though I find him extremely self absorbed. Maidenly, at times.  I don't think M is a little boy, but he has his wounded child within that takes him into his limbic system, just like the rest of us.  Just like you.  Just like me.  When M is IN his limbic system he loses his ability to respond to you in the way you've asked.   It seems he's honored your boundaries at times, and is committed to honoring them... or am I wrong?  Would the couple T say he's trying, committed and working on that for the benefit of the relationship?  If M's truly Nish.... I don't think he could do that, but that's MY experience.  That's MY stuff and it's not fair to SEE M through that lens or the lens you see your mother through. 

I think... 
you know I'm just winging it here, right?  What I'm writing feels true and solid to me.  Whatever outcome... SEEING M clearly, without attaching your mother to him or his actions, seems like it's necessary and helpful, IMO.

I have no dog in this fight, other than wanting you to be OK, safe, and happy.
 I don't want you trapped in a toxic relationship with an N who bullies and controls you through an unhealthy imbalance of power, bc of money.  I also don't want you to SEE M without clarity, make assumptions or attach old stuff or what if fears TO HIM, bc that's just as bad, IMO, as being trapped... maybe. 


If it bothers me so much it shakes me to the core and keeps me awake all night (has quite a few times), maybe I do have to react proactively, in my own self-interest. When I feel strong I can fight for myself. Then there are times I wish I didn't HAVE to be so strong, to be in this relationship. I'd like to feel safe just being however I feel, with him.  I know you're strong, Hops. That can be a double edged sword IF we're working hard to maintain a toxic relationship, fooling yourself, working hard to live in denial bc everyone runs out of energy, everyone ends up drained under those circumstances, IME. 

BUT... if you're hard work is SEEING what's really there, finding it worthwhile and positive in the whole, then doing what you can, that's within your power to bring about homeostasis in the relationship....
trust
comfort
general wellbeing
fellowship
desire for connection as well as time apart...
IF you can break it into more positive pieces, and extinguish the negative pieces bc they were a reaction.... IF they weren't a response to toxic N behaviors that will get worse and lead to misery for both you and M......

Lots of ifs in there, Hops, but I believe you can discern what's real and true and what's old stuff, fear stuff, reactive stuff, wrong stuff. 


My goal isn't so much to be right or in control of everything, as it is to be wise. One friend I've talked about it with sees how much I do NOT want to live on guard, always strategizing my emotional safety, tense about defending boundaries he ignores, and ever-ready to detour around his passive-aggressive stuff during times of tension. There are simply times, particularly as I age, when I would be quite vulnerable to his attitudes and his choices. And I want to be wise around whether M is someone I can trust with my vulnerability long-term.  Again, you have choices.  Discern what's real and SEE the truth or make assumptions.  I think any choice you make will be the right choice. 

This COULD be you replaying old struggles with your mother.
This COULD be M chose you to play the role you played with your mother.
THis COULD be you living in your limbic system, particularly bc of new stresses and bc current/ongoing ones with M ping alarm bells that aren't really about the same danger/crisis/red flags.
 Maybe M isn't worth the trouble.  Maybe he is.  I think you're going to find out.


So far, even after a year and a month, I'm not sure. But it ain't over. I am pretty convinced this is not about the pandemic, but sure as hell is converging with that fear too.  Multiple scary things converge to make super fears pop up.  Watch that video.  It helped me calm myself down, as did the T appt, and SEE things without reactivity lately.  I'm open to whatever the truth is, but I can't see it if I'm living in my limbic system, which is where I've been for the last 2 days.

Just called him as he'd asked. This usually happens when I place the call. He answers hello? And immediately, instantly, launches into a long monologue of whatever he's stored up. It can go on nonstop for 10-15 minutes. Eventually, he remembers to ask about me. I am not sure how interested he actually is, but he manages that courtesy better than he used to.  We all need that person who's our rock.  To listen to everything about us, good and bad.  To understand and validate us.  YOU are M's rock.  He's not YOUR rock. 

You mention he's getting better at asking about you, which means he's changing, at least a bit. I don't know what that change is made of, or if it's based in something you can find comfort in, Hops.


What I remember, growing up with them-thar fancy telephones...was an etiquette that, when someone calls YOU, you say Hello, and then how are you? Or, what's going on? Or such. IOW, a person calls someone to speak to them. With M, the unwritten rule is, someone calls me so I can speak to THEM, and he instantly launches into it. So he speaks first and most, and I get to tag on my own story sometimes, and shorter.  I have to ask myself a question, bc that's a pattern in my life also.  DID I train people to behave that way?  I can tell you I often find myself just wishing the other person will blather on so I don't have to speak.  I also find myself wishing to share and tell my story at times, often without getting the chance.  I know I train people to treat me the way I get treated more often than I realize.  I'm sorting that out, or trying to now.

On the other hand, there are people I've had in my life who are impossible to have an adult exchange with.  I have the feeling you DO have adult exchanges with M, or he wouldn't find you so fascinating, good company.  I also have the feeling his need to be heard and tell you things is SUPER HUGE compared to your need, which perhaps has become even smaller bc M doesn't understand exactly what's going on.
 He pushes in, you pull back.  Your pulling back might be interpreted as something it's not, and I'm babbling at this point about what ifs that need to be sorted into what's true.... what's false. 

I don't expect you to do anything but sort out the truth for yourself, Hops and you're more than capable of doing that for yourself. 


Oh, so familiar. You're right about that!
Rhetorical question....
if something feels familiar, is it the same?
Could it be something else?
Here's how things went for me recently.  IF I can shift into the moment... come back to my senses.... I SEE things from other people's perspectives.  Their flaws, fears, what made them what they are and I can have enough compassion to SEE the truth without becoming emotionally triggered in any way.

IF I'm emotionally triggered, in any way, I can't see the other person's POV, or have compassion for them... and that's an indicator for me. 

I'm not saying having compassion for M means you stay in any type of romantic relationship.  I'm saying that feeling chased and hunted and stressed and pressured and manipulated is typically, for me, an indication I'm living in my limbic system and I can shift into a much better space if I work at it and pay attention.  From THAT vantage point I have more clarity, more ability to respond and make choices about what's real and what's ego/past/future what if stuff.

I trust you'll do what you need to do with M.  I trust you won't make a BIG mistake and if you do.... you can change your mind, shift directions, do something else, ((Hops))  You aren't trapped, but I have a sense you're feeling trapped. 

IF you're seeing things clearly maybe you'll see M is an N, just like your mother, toxic and wrong for you WITHOUT feeling the negative things, bc you've gained emotional distance, access to your entire brain and the ability to see any truth without emotional reactivity. Think of Victor Frankl.  M shouldn't be able to invade your serenity IF you're in control of your biology, and living in the moment, nose off the pebble, seeing the entire field. Are you seeing the entire field, Hops?   Is your nose on a pebble?  Many pebbles? 

Does that make sense?  Lord, I did blather on, but I broke a glass in the kitchen and have to get on the glass break protocol..... a deep cleaning of all surfaces that is definitely OCD.  No doubt about it.  Then I'll enjoy feeling I'm back at my Grandparent's farmhouse, in Grandma's ver clean,  very tidy kitchen.... sacred space for me.

What do you remember about EMDR.  How do you get back in your body?  I remember you talking about ways many years ago...  on this board.  You've been looking at and perhaps practicing this stuff long before I heard of it.  I can tell you this.... it didn't make sense to me until I had a T explain aspects to me so everything came together and clicked.  I heard about it for years, and just couldn't make it work and it had to be THAT one T, her style, her information delivered in the right way for me to process and apply. 

M isn't bad or good.  N or saint.  He's just a guy who's life experiences have made him what he is.  He suffers.... I think that's apparent.  The question is.... can he calm himself down and hear you.... be more responsive and less reactive while he's with you? 

He can or he can't.  If we remove judgment it's easier to see what's real.  If our brains are processing normally we aren't limited to black or white options... we have access to creative problem-solving skills and the spaciousness of more choice, less fear... and we know we're going to be OK, no matter what. You've been through tougher things than this.  You're so smart and competent.  You'll figure it out.

Lighter

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 01, 2020, 10:23:46 PM
Thanks, Lighter. Thanks for all the detail and energy you've put into this.

I think you pose a lot of challenges I can't yet meet: completely unhooking from the N-associations from my past is one. If I could be so Buddha-like as you describe, it wouldn't occur to me to freak out about that. But all I have to go on is my best mingling of past realizations with a desire for those painful learnings to also inform my present, so I don't repeat the same mistakes in sacrificing myself on a cold altar, repeating an old role I don't want to play any more.

It was such a huge role, for so long, that at times it takes what feels like huge energy to push past it. But I wouldn't be examining myself, and M, so closely, if I didn't want it to become easier. I may be gettin' old but I'm going to keep on learning until I croak.

You ease me back into compassion for M, seeing him as a suffering person. I can and do see that. And can be very tender and supportive for him when he's in distress. I just am sorry that he is not that receptive, comforting figure for me. I have to turn elsewhere for calm, supportive comfort when I need it. His need and his anxieties are too great for him to swap rock times with me, alas.

I mostly weather distresses on my own, because I don't find him a reliable or safe partner for those moments.

Tonight I'm way better. Energized all day, getting stuff done. Feeling anchored in myself and much stronger than for the last day or so.

Got my garden beds readied by a friend's son who needs work, and have the veggie seeds soaking overnight. Tomorrow after our Sikh session we'll work together to dribble the seeds down the rows and feel the joy of first planting. I'm hoping our little garden will be a comforting distraction for us both during this siege.

M was extra distressed today because someone in his field, a younger man, died of the virus. His own fear is so intense that he kept saying he wanted to skip our open-air, zero touching, no contact, T appointment. I have to say I agree with my own T's instincts...he just doesn't want to face the conversation that's coming.

I am looking forward to being heard. That's really it. And I feel adult again. My scared child has survived the night and I'm ready for a productive day. (After three weeks lolling about and NOT cleaning my house. Now, I'm in gear...laundry, disinfecting, sheets changed despite my back, etc. Feels good to be engaging in my home and my well being.)

More later, and thanks again...(btw, I've never done EMDR, but maybe this little bit of gardening is going to be what gets me back into the body).

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: CB123 on April 01, 2020, 11:30:43 PM
Hops,

You are stronger than you know, and more perceptive than you give yourself credit for.

There will be many more social structures in place in the near future to help people than there once was. You will be safe. You know how to survive and to take care of your needs. There will be many voices in your head whispering that you can't, maybe your own. But you can.

So grateful to have known you all these years,

CB
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 02, 2020, 12:39:10 AM
((((((((CB)))))))))))

I am beyond grateful for you too.
You have been a lovely lodestar for me for so long.

And thank you for speaking of my strength.
One of the loveliest things is to hear it and believe it.

I have to process anxiety when it comes, by just super-verbalizing
until I've pounded it all into a shape I can work with. The last two
days have just been about that, really, and I feel stronger now because
of it.

Sending you and your kids much love, comfort, courage. I know they
have a lot of their mother's resilience and intelligence, and hope they
all stay healthy and wise. You made great people and you ARE a great person.

When you can, update us more on how you're coping, job, and your provisions.

love
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 20, 2020, 01:23:39 PM
Zoom T-session with M coming up in a few hours.

I've realized it's pretty simple what I need today. I need to tell them, I think there are only two things for me that I need to work in our relationship. Listening, and empathy. Can you (T) help us with those?

When I fell the other day, in those seconds of pain and shock on the floor, one of my first flash-thoughts was, better not tell M. That's not new, but it was a simple re-stating of a truth: he is not a comfort, emotionally, because his focus becomes instantly about himself, his role, or his feelings if it's serious. I would shortly turn to writing a close friend about how it happened and how I felt. Later, when M called, after his usual huge waterfall of lengthy talk about himself, he said, "Oh how did it go with friend's visit today?" Then I got to briefly tell him it was very nice being outside with her, and then told him about my fall, in a brief description. He didn't seem interested and asked zero questions. Shortly he said, "It'll be fine" and switched right back into talking about himself again. That was it.

I told him the next day that I had felt disappointment, that what I'd really needed was some empathy. He said I do feel empathy, that's why I said I'd bring you anything you needed. Classic male socialization, I know...to do actions, to be dutiful. And that's valuable. I appreciated the offer, and told him, I'd like a big salad, and he brought one by, and we sat on the porch in the sun and I was very glad to see him.

It was very similar to how I felt with the stroke. In the moment of crisis, I need to avoid him, because he makes it all about himself and how he feels or sees himself in his role as the one in charge. But the very next day, with him sitting in my hospital room, I was overwhelmed with gratitude for his support.

It was interesting to figure out the difference. What I yearn for is a partner who can offer empathy AND practical support. M only has practical support, dutiful actions, to give. He just doesn't do empathy.

In the post-fall conversation, I tried to explain to him what I'd needed was any kind of empathic interest, that it might appear in comments or questions like:
Ow! That must've hurt!
Did you think you broke anything?
You must've been scared, falling alone.
I'm sorry that happened.

He just said, I do feel empathy, which is why I said I'd bring food.

I believe him. I believe he believes that taking action or stating he will, IS empathy. And it's churlish of me to complain about what else I need/want, but it also brings me a lot of clarity. And helps guide me about where to go in our shared therapy.

My guess is, M will feel defensive. He's already pushed back by saying that his reactions in these situations ARE empathy and doesn't engage or respond to anything I describe that is what I think is empathy. (He'll write me emails about how he is there for me and will do anything I need and loves loves loves me...he is VERY focused on loving in his writing, just not behaviorally in the present). But in person, when I mention it, he disengages, looks away while looking a little irritated, and to me, demonstrates that he is not going to look within.)

So I'm going to be very careful to not make it a criticism of him. Just tell the Sikh, I think we have differences in what we need. M needs most my intellectual, conversational companionship. I enjoy that part of our relationship a lot, but think other parts would grow deeper if we also dealt with listening and empathy. Can you help us with that? Or do I need to accept that it is what it is, we're both doing the best we can, and if I need listening or empathy, I should just continue to get those needs met with other people?

I think that might be a good approach. It's honest and it's not blaming.

Fingers crossed...

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on April 20, 2020, 02:02:20 PM
I hear you, Lighter:

Quote
This is going to be about you, Hops, changing how you view M's behaviors rather than M learning to change all the things pinging off warning bells

There's a little bit of unreality in that for me, though. It'll take some time and some more months of single-T and joint-T sessions, probably. But what I am asking my wisest inner self (hellloooo! please come back sooooon!) is this: If M's behaviors ARE warning bells of the personality disorder I was raised to be drawn to and most dread, then perhaps I should NOT change how I view his behaviors.

If I am over-reacting (layering it over Nmother trauma memories as you astutely mention) then you are right. My goal then would be to de-escalate it and remove its "charge." In my own T work and inner work. So I can stay with M.

It's not really a binary choice. My challenge, I believe, would be to find out how deeply and how much his N-ish (I am VERY confident using that adjective, with the "ish") behavior distresses me because of its emotional impact on me. Are we truly a good fit?

If it bothers me only a little now and then, and I should look at it with fond benevolence--oh, the little Nboy is acting out, I don't have to react...then the answer's pretty easy. Most of the time I enjoy his company, even though I find him extremely self absorbed. Maidenly [edit: Maddeningly! I HATE AUTOCORRECT! LOL!] , at times.

If it bothers me so much it shakes me to the core and keeps me awake all night (has quite a few times), maybe I do have to react proactively in my own self-interest. When I feel strong I can fight for myself. Then there are times I wish I didn't HAVE to be so strong, to be in this relationship. I'd like to feel safe just being however I feel, with him.  I agree with everything you've said, Hops.  And you shouldn't have to fight all the time in any relationship, IMO. 

SEEING what's true is the goal, I agree. 

IF it's just the little N boy acting up, not all the time, and you responding without emotional charge, calmly, not disturbed to the core and up for nights..... that's a truth worth knowing.

IF he's like your mother, and won't change, and actually requires you be upset, bc that's part of his need to feel OK.... that's an important truth, but I don't know it's the truth.  He seems not very aware of your reactions...... but you'd know better than me.

I will say this, though you know it already.....
this discomfort you're dealing with is a message... you need to make a move.  I don't know what moves will resolve it, and restore serenity.  I only know that messages sometimes feel like THE PROBLEM, when they're just discomfort we're meant to deal with and I you're one person focused on figuring that discomfort out and fixing it to the best of your ability, whatever that looks like. 

I don't sense fear or confusion.  I sense reactivity... we all deal with that.... and I sense your happiness when things click with M.... when you aren't stuggling and working too hard to make it OK.

 


My goal isn't so much to be right or in control of everything, as it is to be wise. One friend I've talked about it with sees how much I do NOT want to live on guard, always strategizing my emotional safety, tense about defending boundaries he ignores, and ever-ready to detour around his passive-aggressive stuff during times of tension. There are simply times, particularly as I age, when I would be quite vulnerable to his attitudes and his choices. And I want to be wise around whether M is someone I can trust with my vulnerability long-term.  There's an answer to that, Hops.  It's a solvable puzzle.  You'll figure it out, and feel grounded and right about that decision, no doubt. 

So far, even after a year and a month, I'm not sure. But it ain't over. I am pretty convinced this is not about the pandemic, but sure as hell is converging with that fear too.  It's one more stress on top of other stressors, Hops.  Maybe it's what gets you to the answers more quickly with more speed. 

Just called him as he'd asked. This usually happens when I place the call. He answers hello? And immediately, instantly, launches into a long monologue of whatever he's stored up. It can go on nonstop for 10-15 minutes. Eventually, he remembers to ask about me. I am not sure how interested he actually is, but he manages that courtesy better than he used to.

Well.... he's improving, for what that's worth.  What is it worth?  How does it feel?  Heavy or light?

About the chattering like a deranged monkey with zero ability to control himself... I have experience with similar monkeys.  I had a talk with one of those monkeys lately and we both agreed that monkey just needed to vent, and be heard.  I didn't need to answer, give advice, problem solve or take my mind out of my own business while the monkey chattered.  Some monkeys need to process verbally and touch base with their rocks.  I guess you're one of or THE rock for M. 

I'm curious.... what do discussions around this sound like with him, if you'd brought it up?  Would be be cool with you just being there, not really investing in the conversation?  Just letting him unload so you can both go back to your day feeling OK?

Or would be be upset you aren't participating, giving advice and making him FEEL better by suggesting this and that?  I couldn't do that, Hops.   Especially if I felt I would be punished for taking care of myself, and not him. 

M needs to want you to be OK too.  He needs to make that possible, facilitate where he can and not punish you in any way.  I really think the true measure of a relationship is in how we respond to not getting what we want.  Do we still want happiness and health for our loved one or do we go out of our way to F them up and make them sorry?  Is that what M does?  In any way? 

For me that's a huge red flag.  People should still be able to be kind, or at least not lash out when they aren't happy with us all the time.  You wouldn't lash out at him or punish him.... you're taking care of yourself.  That might feel like punishment to him, but there's a huge difference, IME. 


What I remember, growing up with them-thar fancy telephones...was an etiquette that, when someone calls YOU, you say Hello, and then how are you? Or, what's goin on? Or such. IOW, a person calls someone to speak to them. With M, the unwritten rule is, someone calls me so I can speak to THEM, and he instantly launches into it. So he speaks first and most, and I get to tag on my own story sometimes, and shorter.  I think waiting for a chance to speak, rather than listening, is a universal problem most people suffer, to a greater or lesser degree, IME. 

M has it to a greater degree, always has, it's not personal TO YOU.  I have friends who do that.  I have friends who sort of do that.  I have friends who are sorry when I point it out, but they don't get a whole lot better about it.   

I think part of the problem, for me, is I'm an engaged listener who enjoys listening very much.
 That steers habits in a certain direction... I train people, I admit it.  I'm trying to do a better job, and things seem to be going very well with Mossing L.  A back and forth, lots of interest for both of us. 

You're going to have to train M to be a better listener,  IMO.  Set some ground rules about your time to speak and his time to listen.  My mother always said men are trainable or not trainable, and she ended up in an amazing partnership with a really nice man, BUT SHE HAD TO STAND HER GROUND with him.  And she did.  Without any reactivity.  It was always a response she felt entitled to and perfectly capable of delivering, which she did.  And they'd scrap a bit, then go back to playing like kittens together in their life. 

Scrapping is a part of life, IMO.  Those who don't scrap or have arguments are more likely to fail in marriage, or so I hear. 

You're working on the important things.

You're worth the time and effort and expense to M. 

He seems to be worth it to you.

How's it going with the lovely couple's T?

Lighter


Oh, so familiar. You're right about that!

Hugs
Hops

PS She also said something that surprised me: that the widespread belief that people who are Ns or have many N-behaviors never ever change, is based on old research. That was an optimistic thought. NOT (hah) that M would have a wholesale personality transplant (I wouldn't want that anyway) but that she doesn't automatically assume he could never change any of his most triggering behaviors toward me. He is highly motivated to make our relationship last (even more than I am, because I am willing to leave). And I think she was suggesting that it's perhaps more useful to think about him in terms of him being profoundly insecure, rather than fixate on the N term. (She mentioned his deep insecurity. Not that I can't ever use the N ism vocabulary, but that other language for what he does is insecurity. I will find out if he can practice empathy, at least enough of it, with me.)

The couples-T, the Sikh, is kind enough to come to my back yard tomorrow, to do an outdoor session with us on my private back patio, since M has declared he feels "unsafe" going into the office building. I told her I had wondered whether it was really the virus he was scared of, or was it continuing a challenging conversation we had last time. She instantly said she thought it was the latter. I do too, but since M had already met with me in my back yard, and I assured him he would always be six feet away from the T, and he would be touching nothing the T had touched, he was safe. I think he has no excuse to wiggle out of it, so he's coming.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 20, 2020, 02:22:57 PM
Lighter, thanks much!
I confess I do get lost in all the small blue ink...if you return to a thread you've previously gotten into (which I appreciate!) could you change ink colors for the later pass?

Hope that made sense!

Must go shower/wash hair before Zoom T appointment.
The good news is, no need to shave legs.

HAH!

Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 20, 2020, 07:48:36 PM
Thanks, (((((CB)))))).

The session with Sikh went extremely well. I was honestly amazed. I approached it all with statements about how I didn't assume I was being fair, and insights I'd gotten about the overlap I felt between M and my NMom, and how I still want to stick up for myself, and the various emotional difficulties I have (at times) with his uncontrollable need to start talking and keep talking and basically, take up all the oxygen, so I wind up feeling like a submissive, deflated balloon, and just don't have the energy to fight for my turn at the mike.

What really surprised me was the T's skillful questioning of M, which brought forth the very helpful insight that M has a Very Hard Time calming himself, when he's been listening to news or whatever, and changing channels to actually be present with me. His first instinct is to UNLOAD, and he does that in a compulsive, heedless way, that often leaves me feeling resentful, because I've assumed (long training with NMom) that there's just no point trying to be heard.

The T suggested I learn to say, M can you get calm for a minute, so we can connect? Or something like that. Basically, T was saying, Hops, you need to SPEAK UP when it happens. And he's right.

T also said a lot of insightful things about how M has always and for many years been rewarded for being masterful, taking charge, fixing everything. And that's true.

Anyway, it was a wide ranging conversation, but even on Zoom, I think we were all pretty happy afterward.

I felt less judgmental of M, more tender toward us both, and more hopeful.

It was a big relief. I think one difference was I stopped being careful about saying what I really feel, like: 'I want to talk FIRST sometimes!"

I spelled out how I'd realized if I feel vulnerable, I imagine contacting friends for comfort, not him, and how I'd like to figure out whether M can get to empathy in the moment that isn't all about him playing his heroic roles, but not hearing me at the same time. I got the clarification for me which is, in the MOMENT of crisis, M does not  help or can make me feel worse, but the day after, when the MAINTENANCE of support kicks in, he's so into that.

T also gave us perspective that this kind of thing is changeable, but takes tiiiiiiiime. I felt relieved and better about everything....at the least, willing to keep on exploring all this with M.

I gotta say, I feel incredibly, incredibly lucky that by happenstance, my own T gave us this name in a list of suggestions for a couples-T...and we wound up choosing the Sikh.

Everybody should have their very own Sikh! I like him so very much--he's crazily perceptive. M feels the same way about him....and that joint appreciation of our T bodes well for us, I think.

hugs
Hops

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: CB123 on April 20, 2020, 08:00:13 PM
I'm so happy for you, Hops!

CB
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Meh on April 21, 2020, 04:17:13 AM
A Sikh as a therapist, that's pretty cool maybe.

Out of what you wrote this is the one thing that jumps out at me:  "if I feel vulnerable, I imagine contacting friends for comfort, not him".
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 21, 2020, 05:56:48 AM
Yep. He'll say or do anything, in terms of taking action: bring food when I'm sick, fix something if it's broken, help me in all sorts of practical ways. What he doesn't demonstrate is emotional empathy in the moment of vulnerability. The day after, when maintenance of a crisis kicks in, he's unbeatably helpful.

Described it just that way today and the T told him, all your life you've been in a powerful reward system that's rewarded you for taking charge, producing, doing and acting. What Hops is asking you for is being: with her pain or her feelings, in the present.

T also said that even in their seventies, people can learn empathy. He doesn't believe M has none, but that his life taught him it was just the other things that had value. But that teaching M this is going to take tiiiiiiiime.

Listening, we talked about too. I described his frantic talk and he and the T talked about how M finds it very difficult to wind himself down. It felt helpful and practical.

I'm encouraged. If therapy continues to be this valuable, things could turn out well.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on April 21, 2020, 06:06:48 AM
I'm always amazed at how well you can pick up and talk about very specific points, Hops, and how dedicated you are to talking through them, and I am also glad and impressed that M is sticking with it, engaging in the process and listening to things that must prickle him a bit, even though they are true.  The T sounds like such a good fit for you both and it is quite amazing that there is the tech now to have that group meeting without being in the same room.

I know that you have a research background so this may be something you've researched before and were not impressed by or may have even found out unpleasant stuff about, but I didn't know so I thought I would mention it - I was introduced to Bach Flower Remedies by a therapist I was seeing twenty years ago and I've used them ever since.  I've never done any research into them because I just felt they helped from the outset and I never bothered, to be honest :)  But anyway, I was dosing myself up this morning and reading the description of a person who may benefit from 'Heather' and M popped into my head as I read it:

'.....there is an almost compulsive need to talk about themselves.  They always need an audience and have an irresistible urge to off-load everything that happens to them.  If there is no-one at home they'll talk on the phone for hours, most of the sentences starting with 'I'........'

I'm paraphrasing a bit but it just chimed with what you've mentioned previously and I thought I would mention it just in case M would like to buy himself a bottle and have a little go with it, but of course feel free to ignore completely if it doesn't suit :)  I'm glad the T sessions are going well and hope you can get to a point with him where he feels like the port in the storm more than he feels like the storm :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Meh on April 21, 2020, 06:51:20 PM
Aww that's awesome Hops. Glad you both are getting something out of it.  "T also said that even in their seventies".

Life long learning it sounds like.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on April 21, 2020, 08:24:37 PM
That Heather remedy description is amazingly spot on, Tupp. Thanks for that!
I would love for M to try something but unless it's evidence-based, he won't go there. I have to admit I'm pretty similar, about homeopathy and such. I believe it's all placebo, not that there's anything wrong with that!

Thanks, G. Learning is ongoing, definitely. I remember some of the folks in their 90s I worked with sharing realizations they'd had in very recent years. It was inspiring.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on April 22, 2020, 08:13:14 AM
That Heather remedy description is amazingly spot on, Tupp. Thanks for that!
I would love for M to try something but unless it's evidence-based, he won't go there. I have to admit I'm pretty similar, about homeopathy and such. I believe it's all placebo, not that there's anything wrong with that!

Thanks, G. Learning is ongoing, definitely. I remember some of the folks in their 90s I worked with sharing realizations they'd had in very recent years. It was inspiring.

Hugs
Hops

Perfectly understandable, Hops, I'm the same re placebo - if it works it doesn't matter how, from my point of view :)  I'm glad the therapy is going well and you're making such good progress xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: seastorm on May 02, 2020, 08:02:16 PM
Hi Hops

Last I heard you were applying for a passport just before the full catastrophe of the Corona Virus hit. Hope you had a nice time and got home safely. These are tumultuous times with lots of change. I kind of like staying home.. taking a course in Chinese Painting, Online Pema Chodron, binge watching Ozark  and talking on the phone for about two hours a day, most days. I am adjusting and sleeping and meditating. All very much one day at a time.Oh yes, and learning not to take the bait when a beloved tries to pick a fight.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 02, 2020, 08:41:37 PM
((((((((Sea!)))))))))))))

So wonderful to hear your voice. YAY.
You sound like you know exactly what to do when the outer world goes nuts, as you always have.

I'm so happy to hear you.

My passport app was actually before last summer, when M. took me to Paris. Made it (after a small stroke a few days before!) and visited an old friend in Oslo on the way home. Quite astonishing that all that worked out so well, actually.

I love the sound of your quarantine coping. It's more than coping.

My hope is many people will turn to deeper things during this time.

love,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 06, 2020, 08:19:42 AM
I am all over the map about M these days.

First, we're getting along very well during quarantine. A lot less tension. He seems to have listened during therapy to my descriptions of how hugely stressful I've found his manic, nonstop talking. He's calmer when I visit, less performative, easier to be around. And though he doesn't listen WELL, he's trying more. That's new but very nice!

Quarantine has slowed us down. I talked about how I think we had needed that. From the start of our relationship, M pounded me relentlessly to be his life partner, commit, etc. He's stopped it and the pandemic has jolted him into the present more, me too, and that's a good thing. He's also enjoying very productive work on his articles and a new major book.

In times of anxiety, I still chew on the bad moment we've never unpacked yet. Will be hard to bring it up in T but I will eventually. It was that moment at the jungle house when I had upset/frustrated him (and felt very vulnerable) and he kind of walked around "musing aloud" in a cold way, saying negative things about my character and intentions, but disguising them in the professorial superiority tone. I've never heard it since but at that moment I freaked out, believing I was seeing a different side that could come out during marriage. I will discuss that with my own T today, as she's good at helping me see things clearly. I think I just need to get up the courage to say something like, although with your intellect you're capable of slicing and dicing someone in that sort of cold fashion, if you ever do that with me again when I'm in a vulnerable state and you're annoyed, I will be leaving.

I don't THINK he's a Jekyll-Hyde, really. But my second husband absolutely was, so hence my niggling concern about that. Which may not be entirely warranted.

I do have fears of men and relationships in general. Trust issues. This has come up in couples-T and I think legitimately. The Sikh asked me if I'd ever felt entirely safe in a relationship...and my answer was, more than once, with my father I did.

So after we "worked on" M a whole lot, given his overt dominant manic personality stuff, it's my turn to look at what I'm contributing to our dynamic too. And I feel willing to, because I've been feeling heard by both of them.

In general, I think the update is that we are doing a lot better. I'm glad we slowed down a bit. The commitment is there, but not the urgency.

Though I have to admit I emailed with a lovely young classical musician who'd be quite interested in renting my house. Occurs to me that one way to pass this winter in continuing social distancing, but to prevent isolation, might be to spend it at M's house, and rent mine out for a year beginning this fall. Just to see how living together might go. I haven't said anything to M about it though.

Boy would that give me a chance to face my fears....

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on May 06, 2020, 09:07:47 AM
I'm glad that the enforced halt has been helpful, Hopsie, and that you feel you can/will talk about that unpleasant time at some point.  I think it's great that you and M have done and are doing so much work on your relationship and yourselves.  And yes I can understand the underlying fear about relationships in general.  I'm not sure I can ever trust someone with my whole heart.  It may just be that the damage will always mean a little bit isn't quite there.  But as you've felt safe before then I would be hopeful that you will again :)

My heart quickened as I read about the young musician; I thought this was a love interest!  Lol.  I think the idea of trying it out with M by sharing for a year is a good one.  My only wee practical concern (with my own mother hen head on, and acknowledging that your rental rules and regulations may be very different to ours, and knowing that you are wise enough to check all of these things out for yourself anyway) is whether you can get your house back early if staying with M does turn out to be the clang of doom for your relationship, or just if there is another bolthole if you feel you need some space and just need a day or two on your own every now and again?  Can M leave his house empty and move in with you (and then go home if it's all a bit much?).  You will figure it all out, I know, I just always go to disaster scenario and have images of you living in a campervan over the winter :)  Lol xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 06, 2020, 09:45:34 AM
VERY good question about a potential bolthole, Tupp. That's my hesitation, a fear of being trapped if it goes south. No, don't have one I can think of, and especially during the pandemic (second wave likely in fall) I don't feel I could impose on a friend. It also occurs to me that this idea (of moving there) could be an impulsive decision. I don't know. It might be a wise next step and would boost my savings account, but it also might be like the panicky premature house-hunting, an effort to get to the future and then relax. Hmmmmmm.....

M cannot move in with me. It's not an option. My second bedroom is also my study, which is private (again a tinge of trust, would he look through stuff?) and even though it also has a bed, because it's right behind my bedroom, his trumpet snoring would kill what's left of my sleep. My house would only suit a VERY close couple who sleep together; perfect for a YOUNG couple. And though I hope to be close one day, I'm never giving up my own room. Just been too long, and my sleep is too fragile. Sharing my sole bathroom would be challenge enough, but the lack of a dedicated bedroom for him that's at enough distance to mute the snoring is key. He once told me his late wife made him go sleep two floors down since the snoring was so intense.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on May 06, 2020, 11:03:13 AM
VERY good question about a potential bolthole, Tupp. That's my hesitation, a fear of being trapped if it goes south. No, don't have one I can think of, and especially during the pandemic (second wave likely in fall) I don't feel I could impose on a friend. It also occurs to me that this idea (of moving there) could be an impulsive decision. I don't know. It might be a wise next step and would boost my savings account, but it also might be like the panicky premature house-hunting, an effort to get to the future and then relax. Hmmmmmm.....

M cannot move in with me. It's not an option. My second bedroom is also my study, which is private (again a tinge of trust, would he look through stuff?) and even though it also has a bed, because it's right behind my bedroom, his trumpet snoring would kill what's left of my sleep. My house would only suit a VERY close couple who sleep together; perfect for a YOUNG couple. And though I hope to be close one day, I'm never giving up my own room. Just been too long, and my sleep is too fragile. Sharing my sole bathroom would be challenge enough, but the lack of a dedicated bedroom for him that's at enough distance to mute the snoring is key. He once told me his late wife made him go sleep two floors down since the snoring was so intense.

hugs
Hops

Ah, yes, that makes a lot of sense, Hops, my house is so tiny that with another adult here (ie when a friend comes to stay) it is incredibly claustrophobic and there is no privacy or respite from snoring, coughing, farting, talking or anything else anyone is doing!  Yes that would be hard.

Well - don't rush into anything.  You have time to think and plan (and we may perhaps have more news about virus related things which may or may not have an effect).  It may be an impulsive decision but it also sounds like a good way to test the water a bit (a lot!).  Maybe talk it through with T?  Could you maybe stay with M a lot more without renting your place out so it's still 'visiting' rather than 'living together'?  His snoring does sound bad!  My friend snores a lot and although they are a close couple they both say the only reason they've stayed together is because they keep a second bedroom so that they don't always have to share :)  Lol xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on May 07, 2020, 09:41:41 AM
Well Hops... this is exactly what B & I have committed to, no more - no less, longterm. There are many things to fear in that, I agree.

I think you might start working out your side of things, in couples T, before actually MAKING a decision about it. But it would also be good to start hypothetically discussing how things would be expected to work, what possible pros & cons come up, imagining how it would feel living day to day - trying to communicate without pushing each other's buttons and learning a style of working out conflicts (which are inevitable) when they do crop up.

(((((Hops))))) you'll get inspired, pick a path, and go... and it will all be OK. (to quote Lighter's advice to me... LOL)
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 07, 2020, 10:55:08 AM
Tupp, truth is I have NEVER stayed overnight at M's. The one time I tried I bolted out of there with Pooch at midnight. He'd made zero preparation for me to be there and it was full of her religious books and I just could not sleep. He's moved the books out since but in the interim we had our Upstairs Disaster.

All that can change and will in time if the current trend toward more relaxed feelings around him and better communication continues, with our co-therapy. I am in zero rush and he's accepted a calmer pace too. Just the way it is for us at our age. No logical progression and we are still working out issues.

Talked it over (the moving-in idea) with my T yesterday and realized...yes, it was an impulsive idea. And renting my house out would block my easy return. I don't HAVE to make big drastic steps, and small incremental ones make a lot more sense right now. So regretfully, I'll inform the lovely musician he can check back in fall but as of now, it's uncertain I'll be ready to rent it out. Time will tell. And there are more lovely potential renters around here too. I tend to fixate on fantasies, no less for my house than for me!

What would make sense instead would be that this winter, I give staying over with M a few more tries and see if it goes better. I may broach the idea with him cautiously. I've even thought of asking him if he'd empty out the furniture in the bedroom and have it painted in the soothing soft blue I so love here. And maybe see if a bed I choose would fly as well. If he's super interested in sharing a home with me at some point, his responses might show me how much he really means it.

You're right, Amber, we're fumbling toward a path. And it's important to know as Lighter once pointed out, that I can turn back or turn in a different direction any time I should need to.

I think the renting idea was an impulse, not a plan. Glad I caught that before it went too far. Planning future lives around daydreams hasn't worked too well so far, but having plans and working toward them (as I did to get my own home) feels better.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on May 07, 2020, 05:56:46 PM
Hops:

ONE bedroom of new paint and ONE new bed...... not the new home you fell in love with..... seems like a super reasonable request to help you feel more comfortable in M's space. 

SHARING space with M.

It's forward movement I anticipate M won't blink an eye at.

If I'm wrong.... the very nice T will help you figure it out,  I'm sure.

Is the blue you love one of those Restoration Hardware Store blues?  I just love them! 

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 07, 2020, 07:08:23 PM
Thanks for the encouragement, Lighter.
No rush and we'll see, but I like your perspective.

Don't get me going! I LOVE color. My three favorites in my house currently (like the others too, but LOVE these three):
Sherwin Williams 6239  Upward (BR--most peaceful blue I've ever lived with)
SW 7649 Silver Plate (most other walls in public spaces)
Benjamin Moore Chopped Dill, #496 accent wall behind piano, happiest outcome)
The kitchen is a bizarre Caucasian-flesh-toned-Crayon before they figured out how racist it was. I had a sort of Arizona soft peachy sunset in mind. Hah! I enjoy it anyway.

When I was hunting up my paint sheet to share colors with you I found a document I'd written, What I'd Need to Move In with M, and it was pretty modest, but a list of changes I'd need to feel at home. And you're right, there's another spare bedroom too, which would be my study. But that wouldn't happen unless really Moving In.

That was fun.

:)
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on May 08, 2020, 11:00:40 PM
Hops:

Whatever you discuss with M..... don't ask for it like you aren't deserving.

You are.

Just assume whatever you need IS what you'll receive and keep moving.

In other words, don't send the message you believe you're asking for something you don't deserve and aren't worthy of.  Your eyes, body language, and words should express confidence.

I LOVE ROBIN's EGG BLUE!  Maybe I'll make both bathrooms that lovely blue; )

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 09, 2020, 06:30:44 AM
Lighter, thank you for this. I need to take on this. I am in fact going to talk about it with my T next week. You spotted something, pre-emptively, that really is an obstacle for me:

Quote
In other words, don't send the message you believe you're asking for something you don't deserve and aren't worthy of.  Your eyes, body language, and words should express confidence.

Much appreciated!

So far I just imagine asking him to empty the one bedroom, and paint. He is kind of a tightwad and would want us to paint it together. A few years back I would've happily done it myself, but right now my body and back are so triggery that I think all the bending would be zero pleasant. But I don't know that he'd be willing to have a painter in.

Speaking of which, I've been through some internal agonizing about getting some cleaning help again. One woman I like a lot has described in detail very responsible disinfection precautions she takes and I have found her trustworthy and thorough. Still, it's scary to have someone come into my home now, who also is in and out of other homes. I've booked her but am angry with myself for being so unfit that cleaning my own little house by myself is daunting (bending reaching lifting vacuuming) yet the grit the general decline is depressing.

I'm wondering if I should cancel and wait. The virus is increasing here, though nothing like a large city.

Sigh,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 09, 2020, 12:03:13 PM
I just sent this to M, who responded both that "I'm working on it" and that "we all do it when we're enthusiastic about something or excited about the person we're talking to..." I responded that I've done it too but "everybody does it" might not be the deepest answer, and awareness never hurts. We'll see.

Dear Prudence,

My husband is an interrupter. He talks over me constantly, both when we are having a normal conversation and when we argue. I never feel like I can get my thoughts out. This has been going on for years, and I’m at my wits’ end. I feel like giving up. I feel disrespected. I’ve told him how it bothers me and how I feel unheard. I’ve even tried talking through his interruptions. Nothing works. I think he does it to silence me, but he argues that I have sometimes interrupted him in the past, so his isn’t any worse? I feel like I’d have to be perfect for him to even try. What should I do?

—Interrupting Husband

This situation sounds exhausting, interminable, and like a profound barrier to intimacy, trust, respect, and love—all the things that make a lifelong partnership desirable. Your husband is completely locked into his position and is attempting to use your request as a wedge to make demands of his own, rather than trying to meet you halfway. You do not need to spend another five or 10 or 20 years trying to argue with him about whether he’s disrespecting you. You can take him at his word when he says he’s not going to stop interrupting you, that he thinks you’re wrong to be upset by it, and that you don’t deserve to participate fully in everyday conversation because once on May 15, 2003, you cut him off when he was trying to give you directions to a friend’s birthday party. So many relationship problems can be worked out as both parties are willing—even if that willingness is small, or begrudging, or half-hearted—to call it a problem. But your husband is determined to maintain his position—that he doesn’t really interrupt you, or it’s not that bad, or you do it too—no matter how many times you’ve tried to ask and explain and plead and compromise. You can’t substitute for a lack of interest in changing on his part. You have my permission to give up, if that’s what you choose, and acknowledge that your marriage to this man is over in all but name. I think it will feel like a profound relief.


I also told M I didn't think he's responded like this husband, but wanted him to understand how it felt to that wife, and what the columnist said. I'm not thrilled with his "we all do it" response but told him I look forward to working on this with our joint T. And I am. It's the singlemost important obstacle we have, imo.

Not depressed about it, glad I sent it to him. We'll see how it goes...I think he deflected but also he shows up for therapy and behaves as though he's engaged.

hugs
Hops



Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 09, 2020, 12:07:40 PM
Thanks, CB, for the good examples of how to approach cleaning. An obstacle for me that's as big as the body issues is mental. My inertness. My flabby sedentaritude. I'm fighting that in fits and starts, but sense you've been consistently adult in your approach to taking care of home. That's a huge challenge for me I'm deliberatly working on in my own therapy.

As to painting, you're right! I don't quite know if I should wait for M to ask, what would you need to stay here? Or just bring it up myself. (As I don't expect him to ask, though he might well cooperate if I bring it up.)

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 09, 2020, 02:48:56 PM
Quote
....and I had an oatmeal pan on the stove with a melted spatula in it. She looked at me and said: oh. You don't give that kind of impression.

((((CB))))) Thank you for a Laugh Out Loud! Boy are THOSE precious these days.

Yup, from one clutterholic to another. You get it.

I will need an ottoman the size of my piano, but your post was verrrrry consoling.

:) :) :)

love
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on May 10, 2020, 08:58:56 AM
Seriously?

CB, I'm the "what if?" type too. Yes, I bought another 5 lb bag of flour, store brand, when it finally came back on the shelves... we've been baking, for something to do around here. And I have multiple stacks of things. Things I need to "see" - to remember to do later. Or things I need to do in the morning... or that need to go somewhere else. Half of my garage is the "what if?" pantry. LOLOL and it needs to be unpacked from moving 4 years ago and canned items that are long expired, composted. Just other priorities right now.

Combined with all the different things that the kids like to eat - I've lost almost all my kitchen counter space. (Another month... please contractors, please get it to the move in point!)

As for canvases. Ahem. The one that is now my first painting in 32 years... I bought before we moved to the beach. Hauled it there; hauled it back; finally unwrapped it... stared at blank canvas for two years; one of Holl's friends got me up and playing scribbles with charcoal... gesso'd it... stared at it... and it wasn't until every fiber in my body was totally pissed off and I was tongue-tied and scared to death to open my mouth... that the image jumped out onto the canvas. LOLOLOL.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on May 11, 2020, 02:19:09 PM
Amber:

Your space reminds me of my space.  Counter space comes and goes.  Garage has groceries in it, waiting to be dealt with.  I like to have things out where I can see them too

I'm trying to leave counters clear, for working, not storing. Life is better when I swing it.

Lighter



Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on May 17, 2020, 09:31:55 AM
Hops, something about what you said over on the yard thread pinged off of me. And where I'm at right now in relationship too.

Obviously, there is another tangled ball of emotional yarn to deal with, in any new relationship. Being carried along on the current of the feelings is often pleasant - and I've missed it, these last years. But the conditioned part of my experience & brain is trying to convince me that I "need" this man, this relationship... to be whole. I caught it going on in my head last night after watching Outlander's season finale - which had some very triggering storylines in it for me - and let it all unravel last night in sleep.

And I KNOW, with my practical, pragmatic brain, that conditioned "need" is absolute bullshit. Otherwise, how would I have managed on my own these last 5-7, maybe 8 years? Was I not "whole" then? YES, yes I was. And for all I was willing to invite Hol here - and participate in her work to get whole, as much as allowed and appropriate - that didn't take anything away from me. (Granted, I DID go through a time of being completely confused again. Talking to John - a less invested party who also knows Hol pretty well - has sorted that out now, again. We're able, most of the time, to have more objective dialogue.)

So, why with B would this reflex show up? To see myself as "less than" and needing what B can provide to be whole? (There's more than that specifically; but this is the general gist of the reflex.) And as far as I can tell - it's the conditioned expectation of finding that "completion" in relationship - both mirroring, complimentary strengths & needs and dare I say it? Subordination, if not quite submissiveness (who me? LOLOL; good luck with that). Yes, it's existed in all my other relationships to varying degrees. With Michael, it was more role-playing than reality... but damn, if it didn't get me into a mess every now & then. He needed so much ego-assurance at times, that it was all but impossible for me to refuse him that. Like letting win a chess game.

I don't want to do that again. Maybe there's more to learn about it - but jeez, I think I know enough now to not want to repeat those lessons! I can CHOOSE to do whatever I want. Including revelling in what I can do on my own - and as slow-paced as it has to be 20 years after I used to do this on a regular, daily basis. Taking a day off to just watch the yarn come untangled in the slow lazy current of water... letting B go to do what he needs to take care of; where he is in his process... and being just FINE, thank ya very much... having some me-time, too.

I think he & I are both realizing that this isn't going to be one of those siamese twin type of relationships; where we're joined at the hip all the time, because of our hearts. We don't WANT it to be. And so that sets up the comparison with "conditioned" fairy tale, white picket fence version, all the time.

All that came up for me, in words finally, when you were talking about your yard and not necessarily wanting/needing M to come "help". LOL. And with the help of a lot of coffee. LOL. Happy Sunday.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 17, 2020, 11:02:56 AM
Yup, I can't see you on the cover of a bodice-ripper, Amber!
Or maybe I can, but it would be entire voluntary having-bodice-ripped, and not about swooning or helplessness or submission.

I think the key is to bear in mind one always has a choice to GIVE vulnerability. When vulnerability is TAKEN, though, that's submission. Taking turns with giving and receiving vulnerability is beautiful.

B doesn't sound like a ripper, but if he's got a kilt on....

Now I hafta go re-watch the last episode of Season 5.

Big hugs,
Hops

PS Actually I would LOVE it if M would help me, or take a hint now and then. But he seems allergic to spending a cent on my home. It may be an unconscious thing...maybe he wants me to ultimately move in with him, so why help me fix up my place? Or maybe he's still into stock market shock. I dunno. But there's no point in thinking about it, as I'm on my own.

Another thing about accepting too much help from him is that it becomes for him a delicious drama about his helpfulness. The price of his strutting through it is almost too high to pay at times. (That E.R. stroke story, and a few other times he's been the last presence I'd need in a crisis. The day after, when maintenance begins...he's very responsible and present and dutiful. Always proclaiming "I'll do anything you need!" It may be true but he just fills up the room with his take-charginess. That has value too, if one's helpless, but I fight it.)

The conundrum is, I'm going over for dinner tonight and greatly looking forward to being with him. Yet he was in my yard with me and my neighbor friend and bf last night and he interrupted so much (and I was too tired to contain it) that I yelled his name several times, startling him so I could finish my sentence. That whole pattern reeks of misery to me. I just hate having to FIGHT for the basic courtesy of not being cut off in the middle of a sentence, and raising my voice makes me unhappy.

He really does have a very loud voice in his own brain that drives him like a steam engine to dominate all conversation, especially in a social setting. Getting him to stop his racing monologue long enough to participate is exhausting at times. Other times, I relax with it and enjoy him. He is trying, and does listen a bit better when we're on our own now. But socially, I am literally embarrassed by his monologues.

All in all, apart from those two moments when I nearly blew, we had a great time with the neighbors. She is very similar to M in that she's charming, very insecure, and competitive. They both told stories that were diverting. I stuck my oar in a couple of times and mostly just became audience, and her bf didn't get a chance.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on May 17, 2020, 11:17:16 AM
Holly does that to me often, Hops. I just give her one of those "mom looks" and ask her if I can finish what I was saying. I talk slowly, pause a lot, probably because I don't have any pat statements - I'm thinking, feeling, choosing my words to get my meaning across all while my mouth is moving. LOLOL. (Silly me)

When I can stand my ground that way - she DOES listen. And we do have better conversations. She thinks so fast she's already responding to where she thinks I'm going to go often; and often she's WRONG. That's teaching her to wait a bit before jumping to conclusions.

Guess that's why I'm much more comfortable writing my thoughts & feelings, most times. Especially when it's a deep topic.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 17, 2020, 12:21:52 PM
Bingo. Substitute "M" for "she" and it's exactly the pattern:

Quote
She thinks so fast she's already responding to where she thinks I'm going to go often; and often she's WRONG.

I think my dear M is so accustomed to his mega-intellect being admired (hugely, in his profession) that he's developed a habit of believing his own press, in that he just thinks if his mouth is moving, he's speaking truth. I often call him on it but disagreeing (and it's funny, he'll seem both startled and delighted).

In our domestic world, he's ridiculously arrogant sometimes, boring sometimes, funny sometimes, maddening sometimes, stimulating and entertaining sometimes. If our Sikh can help us both have conversations rather than dueling monologues and dueling battles for attention/space/oxygen...we'll have a great future!

Last session, we talked about listening and something really good happened. I was explaining how I was feeling about the interrupting and being cut off, and described the whole exchange M and I had had over the advice column, including M's email reply: "Yes of course, and I'm working on it, but we all do it, and it's because we're enthusiastic about a topic or excited about the person, and it should never be misread as an intent to dominate."

Pondering that, I realized it was a complete encapsulation of M's pattern, imo. The T had pointed out previously that M tends in response to say something that sounds like affirmation (Yes of course I understand what you're saying) followed rapidly by contradicting (But/However). There are actual steps to it:

I explain my frustration over being talked over and interrupted so much. M:
 1) Affirms: Yes of course I understand (and am working on it)
 2) Contradicts: But/However
 3) Reframes/New explanation: It's only because I'm such an enthusiastic person and excited about talking to you...(implied: who'd be so mean as to criticize that?)
 4) Deflects: Changes the subject (to himself)
 5) Summarizes Good Intent: refers back to My Always-Pure Intentions (you therefore are Wrong to suggest I'm trying to dominate, which I'd neeeeeever do).

We went through it again, and this time I just relaxed and listened. At Step 4, M went into an amazing Deflection that went on at least 5 full minutes (quite a stretch in therapy-time): He'd had such a terrible week because one son's job is shaky now, a son-in-law is getting divorced, and Covid-19 (all of which he'd told me about days before, but was presenting as news for the T). It was powerful because basically, he went on and on in tremendous detail about HIS distress. Then the T asked me what I'd heard, and I was able to say:

I hear a pattern. He first affirms, then contradicts my story and reframes it, and then deflects and changes the subject to HIS distress, and prevents challenge by summing up his pure intentions. I am certainly capable of attempts to dominate at times as most people are, but M's repeated references to his pure heart and good intentions muzzle me. And after all that, my initial issue never got dealt with.

What was good about it is I am convinced that the Sikh sees and hears and spots every layer and nuance of all this (as he does with my stuff too) and that over time, if I'm patient, he has a real chance of helping M see himself. I know he's helped me see important things like problems trusting, issues with feeling unsafe with any male who's not as gentle as my Dad was, which was extreme).

Anyhow, I was very excited about that session. It made me hopeful. And also, the Sikh says to M: In your world and your work, you are the smartest person in the room. (M looks delighted to hear this.) But in this room, about human behavior, I am the smartest person in the room. (M squirms but also looks intrigued.) Funny!

The T told M that the missing piece is M noticing and checking back with me, ever. Such as: Did I respond to what you were asking me? Does this make sense to you? Or particularly (I'm noticing this more and so is the T) -- are  you aware of Hops' face? Stop, look at her face right now. (M's eyes are darting everywhere else.) The T keeps encouraging M to actually tune in. He told M he has an over-developed frontal lobe and is missing info that will be helpful. M says, I need a lobotomy.

I'm probably making all this sound like piling-on-poor-M, but the truth is he is enjoying this, mostly. He is being taught, which isn't common for him, but he's very motivated to make our relationship work, he never acts resentful about it, and he and the Sikh do a lot of bonding and laughing also. I think this therapy is fantastic.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 17, 2020, 02:18:07 PM
Went off on a huge tangent on YARD thread when Lighter asked me a simple question about blueberries? House hunt? Anyhoo, decided to move it here, fwiw.
(Anal-librarian gene expressing, if only it would in my HOUSE!)
--------------
(((Lighter))--

I really don't WANT to house-hunt with M right now. I welcome the Pause. I needed it. We were moving too fast and I was too uneasy and his way of controlling the process was calling up uncertainties about him that I'm currently working with in therapy. Both with him, and with my single-T. I think it's right that it's on Pause.

He and I are enjoying each other a lot, with our 2-3 times/week get-togethers. I'm on my own at my place...he helped plant things one day, but hasn't expressed any interest in maintaining it, because he's deeply involved in his book. I celebrate that for him. He has not shown any interest in helping me with my home projects. (I hinted for some paid yard-work help, and got the sweater.) That's a signal that we're genuinely not ready for real life-merging. And that's okay.

He's paid for power-washing of his own house, tree work, and has done painting lately. That's his priority. He's planting his fig trees. I get it, and don't fault him. But the landscape of where his priorities are is reinforcing that no matter how old and slow we are, we've got a looooong way to go before I'd feel right about a lifetime commitment. M is all words, almost all the time. He loves cooking and having me to dinner because he craves my companionship, and that can be delightful. I almost always enjoy his company. But right now, we're each in our own separate orbits dealing with our own situations/places/mental stuff. It's not really shared.

M is not helping me with my projects. I'm not blaming him. I am the one still writing in bed when everything outside is crying out for attention. It's my problem.

Yes, fertilized blueberries.

If not now, when? is a good question. But I'm feeling so different during the epidemic, having spent so many hours just thinking and sinking back into my own self, that it feels like a less-important one.

Time will tell!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on May 18, 2020, 07:50:57 AM
This might be a dumb question, and you've probably answered it many times over on the board Hops. My brain is just so full of stuff these days - I'm honestly forgetting things.

Do you ever feel that you'd be risking your relationship with M, if you simply stood your ground or rejected one of his suggestions or refused to play the same old role day in, day out? I know you'll assert what you believe are your best interests and protect boundaries... but, even in "bull in the china shop" Amber will go out of her way to stand down and step away from a potential argument or conflict because she perceives a risk to the relationship (that may or may not really exist).
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 18, 2020, 10:01:40 AM
I honestly don't, Amber. M is all in on us forever, a bit more than I am. Thanks for asking it though. Though at times I've had to fight for it, M will back off.

I'm not all the way there, but what I'm hoping to solidify is a feeling shift in myself. Best way I can describe it before more caffeine is:

My goal is to draw and protect/respect my own boundaries not out of anxiety that his confidence/forcefulness will over-ride me but calmly, routinely, because it feels as comfortable and normal to say No as it does to say Yes. Not full of "charge" if I say No, nor some kind of fatigue when I say Yes. What I want to get to is behaving as though and believing that Yes and No are just different correct answers.

I'm definitely in need of more practice with this. And I'm sure I'll get many opportunities!

How do you feel about boundaries with B?

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on May 18, 2020, 04:50:00 PM
Good to hear Hops! You can probably imagine, that question arose my own checking in with myself. LOL.

He's better at boundaries than I am. And very very considerate of whatever mine might be - if I haven't already made it clear. I'm very comfortable with him on that question. OTHER people, maybe not so much. But having someone to compare to is helpful. And over these months of being stuck here together - a lot of things have been hashed out and are resolving. There haven't been as many distractions or ways to procrastinate dealing with things.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on May 18, 2020, 05:26:08 PM
Hops:

I'm going to post a brief suggestion, and not a lot more around it.

If you, the Seik and M used your birthday re-do as excercise for improving  M's attunement to you, your words, your expressions and joy....

If you asked for what you want in a straightforward manner....

If M selected a gift, bc it would bring YOU joy (instead of him joy).....

there are lessons here that can't be teased out verbally, IME.

Sometimes doing is better than dissecting the mistakes. 

Sometimes getting on with solutions is the best lesson of all.

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 19, 2020, 02:14:35 PM
Thanks, Lighter.
I think horrible gift-giving is characteristic of people with a high degree of narcissistic traits. M is one such. I wouldn't go so far as to slam him with the cascade of horrible-human judgements that most things N-ish usually call up in me. There's goodness there too. Or at least I'm thinking so. Hoping I'm not deluded. That's really the bottom line about why I'm glad moving is on Pause and we're in T.

Anyway, my theory about the gift-giving thing is that for one reason or another (in M's case it may be a kind of hyper brain that makes it more difficult to focus on others' realities) -- or who knows, just plain self-absorption and lack of insight -- some people are just incurious about others' inner lives. And therefore lousy at remembering enough detail to get a meaningful or delightful gift for an individual.

The Sikh asked Monday, out of the blue: Hops, would you like it if M asked you more questions? I nearly leaped out of my chair. Dang, this man is good.

M seldom asks me questions, or listens long enough to learn about my layers. He has a kind of repetitive list of positive/"sophisticated" attributes of mine that he loves to declaim. I said in T that although I recognize they're positives, his way of using the exact same list and repeating it often to me or in therapy, "this is why I so value Hops" leaves me unmoved, feeling even less connected. It's weird but I don't feel flattered, I feel memorized. "Here is the executive summary of Hops--why I admire her and want her." The list is unchanging. Literally.

He didn't get it, but did say he'd try to vary the adjectives. LOL. I think he is totally sincere in saying the list to himself. I think he confuses admiration with love. But to the degree he has love in his heart, and he does, I know his love for me is also real.

I'm sure that was all very contradictory. It is in my head too.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on May 20, 2020, 08:03:09 AM
More power to ya Hops... that kind of stuff would drive me totally bonkers. Especially if he pulls out a thesaurus and just substitutes new adjectives for you. :P 

It almost sounds like he has to reduce you to an abstract in his brain - a bare-bones outline devoid of sentience and emotion. Very Vulcan-like; Mr. Spock...  ... ..... ............. idea.............

Do you s'pose this is a defense mechanism that he projects on others, because he doesn't want to, is afraid of, getting into what he really feels? feelings in general? (I know that sentence requires a decoder ring; Jeez... this is why I'm terrible talking too.) Do you see what I'm getting at here?

I see glimpses of that in Hol, too. Usually, right before the tears start. She is loathe to open the gates and just be with her emotions - I think she fears drowning in them and losing the "superpower" of mental-verbal magic. Her dreams (subconscious stuff coming up this week) are bad enough. So, it's like she doesn't know that her emotions - for as intense as they are - can't control her to the extent of not being a conscious, intentional being. (To a slight degree, this IS true for many people.)

And maybe this is all hot air out my nether regions... and in reality I am speculating on something that not even I see clearly enough (yet) to come to any conclusions.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on May 20, 2020, 08:29:15 AM
Hops:

I was just sure the T would follow up with asking you to tell M what would have been a thoughtful bd gift to you, from M.

An exercise in practice so M could experience, with the T's help, asking for information then receiving it.  Reheating back what he heard, so you can correct.  Asking for it in writing.  Agreeing.  FEELING joy in giving a personal gift, tailored to the woman he loves.....or child / grandchild/ friend.

If he can't care/ be bothered/give up control over that...... I'd want to know.  I'd also want the T to walk me through it. 

Walk M through it.

It seems to me the devil will be in the details.  Small joys can offset negatives, IME.  Feeling M cares as much about your joy, as his own, would be something, imo.

Cultivating the habit if asking for info and asking for what is wanted seems necessary.

Now I'm going to let the sweater go....I think.

Helping you with your yard and garden would work in M's favor.  Not against him.  He should understand that.   Acting from a place of fear and resentment needs to be addressed, IME.  IMHO it's the priority.

M might have the future he wants with you.  He's going to have to find a way.....the T will have to provide a scaffold FOR M, IMO.  There have to be limits M understands and internalizes.  Certain acts if curiosity/seeking......reading the room.  It will only help M in all areas of his world.  Or not.

All my opinions, if course.

Lighter



Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 20, 2020, 09:48:46 AM
Amber, this is really perceptive:

Quote
Do you s'pose this is a defense mechanism that he projects on others, because he doesn't want to, is afraid of, getting into what he really feels? feelings in general?

I'm thinking so. It's odd, because when he feels sad he'll be very open about that and turn to me for empathy. (He just lost another colleague in another state; when anyone he knows dies he is always devastated. He told me last night he thinks it's because it scares him, brings death close. That was a good insight.) He hadn't seen the man in years -- knows many people in his field and refers to them all as "very good friends." I find it sad that his world is all professional and the way he describes friends is always accomplishment based, never about personality. His world for all its cultural variety is very narrow. There's no evidence to me of any close friends here in town. He sees colleagues at the Univ (now closed due to covid) and talks about them, but only about work. I think he does love them. But there are no bonding activities with local friends in his life. A wine club a few times a year, that's it. Nobody calls him other than colleagues (about work) or family. No meeting a friend for a beer. Then again, this is true for many men his age. The woman is the friend.

What you notice I think is his discomfort with actual within-relationship intimacy. I'm not sure, but I think he believes intimacy is someone else listening to him talk. There's much less exchange of feelings and nuance than in other dialogues I've been in; and the lack of question-asking means less exploration of the other (me). Sometimes though, I don't mind his incuriosity -- that autopilot thing is less work!

I feel compassion for him yet I can also feel disconnected. (I've said several times in T that I'd like a deeper connection.) He's quite childlike when he's sad. Or does things with his voice that make him sound very young. He has a dramatic way of speaking at all times, and when he's sad I find I feel inside unsympathetic. I don't show that because I don't like it. I'm just hyper-leery of being maternal with him, because although he can be super-executive in parts of his world, he's nearly infantile in other parts. I am pretty direct when I comfort him but not soothing. I just say, sincerely, I'm very sorry you lost your friend, etc. I'll be kind but not soothing. For some reason I'm very uncomfortable offering that because of a sense it'd be endless. Developmentally, he seems more childlike than I feel good around.

All this sounds really sour but I'm not feeling that. It's just that I'm tuning into how M seems to have a gear or two missing that I'd enjoy if he had them. Like he's in first or fifth, most of the time. I think there's more there, but am not sure it'll ever come up to the surface for us to enjoy exploring together. However, in T things do seem to slowly happen. I need to be patient. Quarantine ain't helping. I'm pretty stagnant myself at the mo'.

Lighter, I have never brought up any dissatisfaction with gift-giving to him or to the T, because my internalized values from childhood would forbid that. (That's "greedy.") So there's no discussion or b-day re-do--it was weeks ago. I'll just figure that before another obvious gift-giving occasion (like Xmas), I'll try to remember to nicely ask more directly for what I'd like. Otherwise, I was trained never to act as though I want a gift. I like sensitive surprises, so tend to feel disappointed at the cliche stuff. On the other hand, M is someone who would be responsible to me in the big picture, and if I were feeling more appreciative (working on it!) I'd focus on what I DO have with him, not what I don't.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: CB123 on May 20, 2020, 10:14:25 AM
Hops,

How long have you had a relationship with M?  How long had you been together when you started going to the T?

CB

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 20, 2020, 11:37:32 AM
Hi CB,
We met a year and three months ago.
We've been in couples-T for about five months.
Took quite a while to begin working harder in those sessions, I think.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 20, 2020, 12:16:28 PM
BTW, if I haven't said so clearly.....THANK YOU, alla-y'all, for asking me questions and offering ideas/insights about this Relationship stuff for me.

It really, really helps me think and grow and challenge (myself and M).

I'm uber-grateful.

Hops

PS I have asked myself a couple of times lately if noticing and admitting M's narcissistic traits (not diagnosing) feels like.... I give up, I am SO well trained to adapt to N-ish personalities that it almost feels like fate that I'd be involved with another one.

That said, M is sweet. He can be funny and kind. He definitely wants to be connected to me, wants to commit, wants my lifetime companionship. (Both suffocating AND security-feeling.) Yes, he is quite self-absorbed, but he's also been motivated to embark on therapy with me just because I conveyed that it was needed. Not every man in his 70s would say Yes and hang in so willingly. Plus, I never experience resentment or blowback from M after I bring up something unpleasant-for-him in counseling. If anything he seems more loving and happy afterward.

And another thing is, I'm seeing him again tonight and looking forward to it. We have a kind of silliness we do together that is truly fun and happy. And as we get to know each other more, I'm less reactive. We'll see....but I was thinking I'd been painting a pretty harsh and one-sided picture of him here. He deserves fairness.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: CB123 on May 20, 2020, 03:17:11 PM
Hops,
Have you ever gone to the beginning of this thread and read everything that you posted and the things that came up and when they came up?

I wasnt on the board yet when you started the thread, so I had to do that (as well as threads for Tupp, Lighter and Skep) in order to have any idea what everyone was doing these days. When you read it all at once, it has a flow to it, that is probably the whole reason why all of us should keep journals anyway.

Wishing you peace.

CB
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 20, 2020, 09:55:47 PM
Good idea, CB, thanks.
I started and got to page 7....wow.
That's a lotta ink on a little-over-a-year relationship!

Given it's the first serious one in decades, guess it's been worth the effort.

But however it turns out, I'm still learning and always will be (I hope).

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 21, 2020, 01:47:26 PM
CB,
Thank you so much for suggesting that. Just finished and it took HOURS.

One thing you said at one point really sticks: You began to realize that you spent an inordinate amount of energy analysing and understanding him, believing if you did, things would become different. And how you feel about that, looking back. Wishing you had that time back.

This whole thread was an illustration to me of that same thing. I've learned good stuff, useful insights, about myself too, but I've spent a deep amount of energy learning HIM.

All in all, re-reading the thread made me feel more confident and calm. I'm not sure why, other than the amazing insights and support that came in so reliably and helpfully and amazingly from y'all here....but maybe it's that everyone on the board reminds me of my capability and strength, especially when I forget.

I just feel better. When I need to draw a boundary or challenge M, I can do that. When I need to get my nose off the pebbles (understood that much better on second reading, Lighter) I think I can do that.

And now there is a truly amazing Sikh who is carrying part of the load. And that is a criterion for continuing. Incredible insight and perspective.

So maybe I need to remember that slooooooooow is the point. Remembering I ALWAYS have my own-home, own-timetable, own-priorities to respect and listen to.

No matter how antic M becomes from his own anxiety, my anxiety is my own job. My pace is my own challenge. My lost productivity is my own priority.

My own T listened to me yesterday until I hit an insight for myself. The common denominator in practically everything I've struggled with (before and during M) can be summed up in one word: NEGLECT.

Now I know where I have to grow. We connected self-neglect to all of it: home care, exercise, physical health, relationship boundaries, assertiveness, writing my Real Stuff (my true purpose) and so on. It ALL fits.

And she connected the difference between beating myself up when I do the neglect (oh you stupid ADD old woman, or, as I told my previous T for YEARS: "I have lost interest in my own life") -- and which voice in my head I am willing to listen to, in order to heal and progress. I've got two choices:

--the harsh, critical-parent voice that shames me for what I have not done
--the kind, loving voice that in a friendly, coaxing way encourages me to tackle the things I feel overwhelmed by, one at a time

I didn't realize how profoundly I'd chosen Evil Voice.
It was wonderful to remember I DO have another (Inner Friend Voice).

It really is all about loving yourself. SO hard to get that lesson all the way inside. But I realized it really is the answer to everything. Health, home, relationship, creativity, everything. If I start with that friendly loving attitude to myself no matter what I'm doing/not doing, everything healthier in me responds.

Thanks for much for that suggestion -- it was very illuminating.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on May 21, 2020, 02:06:12 PM
Oh wow, Hops, that's huge.  How amazing that you've come to that realisation.  There's a school of thought that people come into your life to teach you different things and that kind of struck me as I read your post - that quite unknowingly, all of the work and time spent with M has brought you to realising you need to love and be kinder to yourself - as compassionate and caring with you as you are with M and with all of us on here (and others in your world, I'm sure).  A good reminder for all of us as well, I think.  I'm so happy that realisation has settled in with you now xx xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 21, 2020, 11:54:36 PM
Thanks, ((((Tupp)))).

It's like that old sarcastic saying: You can dish it out, but you can't take it.

I realize one can apply that to love, too--if I find it easier to love others than myself. That's actually not a saintly thing to brag about, it's an unhealthy thing that holds me back.

I felt like I'd been shot out of a cannon today, the relief was so deep. Actually dealt with a whole lot of domestic stuff and it felt good. Back and knee aren't very happy at the mo' but the rest of me is!

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: CB123 on May 22, 2020, 10:18:51 AM
Hops,

Love that burst of energy you get when something inside breaks loose! I see you taking care of yourself by tackling something that matters to you.

I REALLY GET the Evil Voice. I would probably characterize it as a constant murmur of disapproval. It's hard to conquer (I haven't), and I wonder if we look for someone to counteract it but are not too surprised when they start being a stand in for it. In a way, having a person we can try to please, or even use as an excuse for why we don't pursue our own dreams, feels more manageable? I have wondered that a lot. I have done that a lot.

CB



Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 22, 2020, 11:06:59 AM
I think that's a big insight, CB.

Focusing on M (to whom I just wrote a LONG email explaining "forced-teaching" and how it may undermine our relationship) ... is only productive to the extent that it helps me evaluate (based on his response or lack of) how real and plausible this relationship might be for ME in the long term. No emergency, but a sense I'm gettin' real with him, more real with myself too.

And then it freed me up. Now I'm ready to get going and get more done today, me and my Friend (inner friend). And that will bring me happiness regardless of what's happening with the relationship.

Duh. (Whoops, there's mean belittler again. SMACK!)

hugs
Hops

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on May 22, 2020, 01:24:22 PM
Hops:

I'm relieved to read you're getting more real with M and with yourself.  M needs that information to determine his ability and drive to meet your needs, where you are, or not.  YOU need this information to make long term decisions with clarity and economy of motion.

That's, IMHO, the mission.  To really SEE what you and M have to offer each other.  Can you both get your needs met?  What about wants?  Is it all one way?  Really important information gathering going on here.  Might as well get to the substance and please.... remember you're as worthy of having your needs met as M.  You're advocating for yourself and it's OK to do that: )  It's the main reason I wanted you to ask M for a joyful BD present redo.  To SEE what he'd do with your outright request, but mostly..... to see you overcome your resistance to asking. 

It's not selfish.  It's self care.  NECESSARY self care. 

What M does with this information is up to him.  I'm very glad the Seik helps bring clarity and move you guys along at a good pace. 

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 24, 2020, 04:33:21 AM
I hear you, Lighter. Asking for what I need and want is assertion, first cousin to boundaries. Saying yes to myself but releasing the outcome (except whatever part I control).

I don't think I'll focus on gifts, but on asking for what I want in my own life and in my relationship.

Had a blue day today (boy am I moody) because M responded fairly dismissively to my big missive. Kind of blew it off as a 'bad habit" from "too much therapy" etc. Said something about how I like to go "very deep" while implying that he just doesn't. Wasn't hostile but clearly isn't ready to sink inside himself and find out what's there. He's been lodged in the frontal lobes so long. I hope he re-reads it at some point and takes it in. (And he did make clear he's still seeing his individual T.)
He wound up emailing with some happy stuff and ending with I yam what I yam. Probably I could translate that as, not motivated to change myself.

So that's okay. He doesn't HAVE to get it. But I do (back to asserting). Next time he  launches a forced-teaching episode after I have nicely told him I don't want to be taught this recipe right now, please stop reciting every detail of the whole process when I just asked about an ingredient, please stop narrating this--and if he doesn't, I will peacefully get up and leave.

One connection I haven't made for him, that I will save for counseling, is that his autopilot tone and insistence on continuing, even when I was asking him to stop, is exactly how it felt (though it was extreme) during our disastrous time in bed that day. That IS a form of domination, and I think putting all these incidents together and recognizing a pattern of domination is what got to me today. I don't have to deal with it often --mostly it's charm and fun and relaxing together-- but I don't want a permanent relationship where I'm frequently having to fend it off, either.

I told him I'd felt tearful and frustrated today and he asked me to tell him about it, but I wasn't ready. I think that needs to happen with the Sikh. If the T can continue to teach M empathy then things will get better. If M is rigid and uninterested in exploring the self and emotion and empathy, then things will stay the same.

All will be well. I think quarantine catches up with me sometimes.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on May 24, 2020, 05:08:57 AM
The having to get to the end of an explanation or story (I wasn't sure what you meant by forced teaching at first but I get what you mean now) is something I recognise in autism (and I expect other things as well) and it's very interesting when you see how it works differently in different environments - in a teaching or academic situation it's perfect because everyone is there to learn but not being able to switch it off in other environments is very difficult for everyone concerned.  I hope you can find a path through it, Hopsie, I really admire you for examining everything so carefully and taking it all out to look at it objectively.  There's no brushing off or glazing over things with you, and equally no desire for everything to be perfect.  It's a very impressive combination and along with your willingness to also examine your own thoughts and feelings and take action if necessary, I think M is much luckier than he likely realises sometimes.  I do hope the domination isn't a theme that can't be changed.

Yes, assertion and boundaries, they do go hand in hand, don't they?  I'm still having trouble with clear assertion rather than making excuses, ("I'm too busy to come over or too tired" instead of "I feel you only call me when you want something and I'd like our friendship to be more reciprocal - I'd like to talk about that before we meet up again").  Just writing that made me go a bit cold so I'm in awe of your ability to be so direct but also polite and compassionate as well.  I need to be more Hops :)  Lol

I think the quarantine madness is coming and going in waves.  Everyone gets affected by it sooner or later so I hope it settles down a bit for you again soon xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on May 24, 2020, 07:52:06 AM
Oh, Hops. I hope you aren't in a position to fend off dominating behavior, without end, too.  I just wouldn't thrive under those circumstances.... unless I found a way to unhook the reactivity around it.   Just not hear it, not let it get to me.  I don't know what that would take for you, but I hope M can learn how to STOP doing it. 

I'm picturing you distracting M from his habits and it looks like a lot of work to me. 

Rhetorical question.... when you feel into your body...... do you feel M understands T, how he's the student... how you're both working on changes to bring you together in harmony?

 Or do you have the feeling he's engaged bc he's interested in himself....happy to spend time with you as a couple's activity, rather than getting down to nitty gritty work? There should be code words and playful pointing out of behaviors he CAN stop or at least notice he can't stop.  He should be looking at your face...into your eyes..... SEEING your distress.  Caring.  Changing his patterns, if he can.   That kind of change isn't perfect.  It's the crabbing forward, sideways and backwards learning, but there should BE recognition.... doing better..... understanding.  Not just interest in talking about himself and continuing on as he's always done,while giving lip service to your feelings. 

If he doesn't want to change, doesn't feel he should change, isn't interested in change... that's important information. 

Do the different Ts ever speak to each other?  I think they should, if they don't.
Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on May 24, 2020, 08:28:07 AM
Wild guess:

Does M see this didactic & pedantic domination as "sharing" himself? B can kinda get into that mode when he's anxious about his vulnerability; Mike was worse about it... no getting a word in edgewise.

Hol's pointed out several times reently, that people reach adulthood with very little emotional education. Meaning that we never learned how or became comfortable working in the emotional space. It has been popular in modern society to glorify rationality and reason over emotions for quite a while. And especially in male conditioning. So emotional work was not prioritized in parenting. I guess it's just assumed that this comes from experience and socialization. Because of her intense emotional states and the physical agitation that comes with it... she & I have been stumbling along together learning, pondering, and sorting things out on that topic.

IIRC, at various times, we've dealt with things that came up for each of us - bemoaning the fact that no one ever taught us the actual meaning or how to manage various emotions. Or confusion of one emotion with another even. We were just told "that's what women live with" - a dismissive statement that it's not important.

This isn't even a complete picture, but maybe it's enough for you to catch my meaning.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 24, 2020, 12:55:27 PM
Wow.
When I got to the Board today and read these I just felt overwhelmed with gratitude.
Seriously.
It is flippin' AMAZING that you all are here, like a daily resource of support, wisdom, thoughtfulness and company.

Absolutely incredible (thanks again Doc G) and I am incredibly GRATEFUL.

That said, I'm going to read other threads and take in some more caffeine before I get back to this. Don't wanna give M-analysis much time today if I can help it.

Hugs, big ones--
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 24, 2020, 02:31:31 PM
Thanks, Tupp. Your comment about the spectrum reminded me to consider also that M may have some degree of neuro-atypical something. It's never a bright line kind of thing and certainly no diagnosis, but it does fit with some of his behaviors: the compulsive talking, fiddly restless hands, hyper behavior, addiction (food) and obsessiveness about his routines and ways of doing things. I mean, why wouldn't there be "co-morbidity" as there so often is with various things? ADD, OCD, selective deafness? I'm sure I'm a pile of them: ADD, mood swings, sleep disorders, periodic depression, blah and blah.

All of those I think are not so terribly severe as to mean I can't adapt. Literally politely walking off is likely the best way, in case I can't get through verbally.

As to the domination when under stress, I dunno. I don't expect him to be perfect and he's a lot more pleasant to be with than other men I've loved. But that trait is one I do not want to have to deal with in an ongoing way, especially when I'm feeling vulnerable. It's infrequent, but of a piece with unaware entitlement that his upbringing marinated him in. We had a deeper than usual talk yesterday. At one point, I said to him (judgement-free): you are elitist, and he said yes, I am. He didn't take it as an insult but as an observation and wasn't offended. He's too intelligent not to realize that the way he was raised and trained to view the world, and the rarified gilded ivory tower he lives in, hasn't had that effect.

On the other hand, M is very very smart and at times when we talk either alone or in T about deeper stuff, meaning nuances (if not emotional ones), I can see his eyes light up with interest, and sense his wheels are turning. I also notice some changes in his behavior at times that feel as though they came from him trying to learn. I honestly think he writes so much (as do I) that it was a big mistake to bring it all up with him BY EMAIL. I am just as sensitive to the written word as he is, and no matter how much I tried to cushion the observation ("these episodes contained dominance") with love and compassion, I think he still felt defensive. I can't blame him for that. We've both got to learn to connect and communicate in the real and from the heart. In fact, what I interpret as dominance might be partly that, but even more, compulsion. That's easier to forgive. Dominance hits me in some primitive and threatened place, and I don't like visiting there.

More practice, assertion and boundaries, might actually work well in the long run.

Lighter, you're so astute and it IS a lot of work. Time will tell whether it's been worth it. Generally as long as I'm learning and not too anxious, it is so far. But thanks for asking illuminating questions:

Quote
Rhetorical question.... when you feel into your body...... do you feel M understands T, how he's the student... how you're both working on changes to bring you together in harmony?

I know that now and then in T, the Sikh reminds M that he wants M to get more of what he wants: more trust from me, and a happier relationship. M usually seems to take that in with trust in the Sikh. He said once recently when we were getting intense (usually our T-dialogue is pretty friendly): The most important thing to me is to show you how not to hurt each other.

Quote
Or do you have the feeling he's engaged bc he's interested in himself....happy to spend time with you as a couple's activity, rather than getting down to nitty gritty work?
I know he started T because I made it clear I thought he needed it individually (told him he HAD to learn to manage his own anxiety) and later that we needed it together. His reaction to something I clearly state I want or need that will move our relationship forward is to say Yes. (I think he sensed in both decisions that if he refused he would likely lose me.) He isn't always receptive in individual difficult moments, but overall he seems entirely willing to hang in with therapy. I think he downgraded it a bit in his response to that big email only because something might have hurt. His ego has a tough time letting in less-pleasant information about himself. Mine too.

But I also think some of it is interest in himself and "couple's activity" -- he has from the start wanted more connection and certainty of commitment than I have been ready for. So, I think he sees it as a necessary step to get what he wants.

Noticing my face, eyes and responding to present emotional information from me (much less verbal) is something the T has begun to raise with M. Plus, asking me questions. I don't yet know whether it's neuro-psycho-bio stuff that makes it difficult for him. Don't really care, honestly.

My general hope is that the effect of T over time will be to make him a bit more flexible and a bit more curious, about himself and the human element in everything. More aware of how his behaviors affect me, and more practiced in tweaking them. The relief with the Sikh is that he can help carry the weight of the hard work; I'm not alone in it any more.

If he's at permanent-Popeye ("I yam what I yam") and either unable or uninterested in stretching his knowledge base, then my interest in deeper commitment or marriage may wear away. And despite my security needs, I might be better off letting that happen. I don't have to decide now and I'm glad of that.

We're each trying hard in our old-fart ways. He started fantasizing about renewing travel again, mentioning this European city or that one, and I thought, I'm so glad we can't do that for a while. And I will not go, unless I'm feeling very confident about where we are. He's both stimulated and soothed by the intense distractions of travel and its reassuring luxuries, and though I enjoy those too, I need way less than he does. Quarantine is a good teacher.

This is too long. Gonna reply to myself to break it up. :)

grateful hugs,
Hops

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 24, 2020, 02:43:01 PM
Amber, thank you.

I think you're right that he thinks pedantic holding forth is sharing; and also very right about how socialization about emotional realities is practically nil in our immature culture. That's huge and impacts everything.

I guess one reason I'm here on the Board is that even within our toxic, selfish culture, I felt as though my childhood, N-mother, broken marriages and bad relationships were all worse than life HAD to be. IOW, if I can keep my mind open and my assertion/boundaries in play (and get more comfortable with those), I think life could be pretty happy. And by my measure so far, this is actually a pretty happy relationship, believe it or not.

I'm brittle. Very scared of toxic masculinity even in elegant, high-flown forms. Yet I continue to think I'm also accurately perceiving that M is a good person, someone who wrestles with ethics and questions of power. He questions the former way more than the latter...so maybe if I can be a vehicle for him to learn something, it'd be about power. Still I see his sweetness and his human vulnerability (his kids, my dog, his students).

But I also (today, these posts, are evidence) don't want to do the thing CB described -- siphon off my energy for my own life and dreams and development into over-analysing HIM and thus doing the emotional labor that is HIS. I think that's part of what got me down yesterday. I'd done this deep dive and heaved over a lot of boulders to understand something key, and he just saw bugs under the rock and it spooked him. If I'm patient and wait to hear what he says about it in T, things might be better than I've been assuming.

I won't write him off yet. The beauty of T is that I know his mind is active enough that he won't be able to completely block out that he's gotten some new information. And I'm also convinced he DOES respect me, and senses my higher EQ, and is drawn to somebody who has an effect on what is really pretty unbalanced in his life. (T told him he lived in his frontal lobes and there's a whole
'nother part of the brain to explore...) All I need to do is take care of MYSELF in the context of us, and wait to see how he shows change and intention, or doesn't.

Whew. This must have been so tedious and over-detailed to wade through, and I'm sorry I write at such length. Hazard of the hobby, but it's a lot for you guys to read.

I am really profoundly grateful that you do. Thank you for the thinking.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on May 25, 2020, 08:44:24 AM
It's OK how much you write Hops. Really - even when it's long. It's because there's so much CONTENT in it - and all the nuances too. You are very much a real person on the page, at least to me - your authenticity comes across. That's  appreciated a LOT.

I know what you mean about doing the heavy-lifting in the analysis dept when it's his own work. There's been a lot of that around here lately and it's not that useful or healthy - even though sometimes we do have to take stock, holistically. That's over for now, for me.

Sigh... relationships at this age, are no less fraught with all the unknowns and uncertainties than they were in our 20s or 30s. But what is different is US. Most of us have ourselves a lot more sorted out; we know our strengths & weaknesses - and are more fluent in that emotional "thinking" now. Finding the inner confidence to intrepidly wade through whatever the "next thing" in our lives is... is also useful, and not to be confused with the cockiness that comes from ego-status.

This sounds like a good journey you're on with M. No matter what the outcome turns out to be.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 25, 2020, 09:45:43 AM
Thanks, Amber. I appreciate this.

And it partially answers my queries to you on Farm Life.

Forgive if I overstep there....

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on May 27, 2020, 04:56:01 AM
Hopsie, I don't find your posts tedious or over detailed; quite the opposite.  You always write very clearly and explain your thought processes so well.  I always enjoy reading them.

I do think it's difficult if you're in a relationship with someone who has a condition of some sort, whatever it may be, to disentangle the 'condition' behaviour - stuff that they genuinely can't do much about because of the way that they're wired - from the 'arsehole' behaviour - stuff that they can deal with but it may get swept up with the genuine stuff as being their 'thing'.  As a very brief example from my own past, I had a boyfriend - who I loved very much - who suffered from depression.  And as a result, didn't go to work much, didn't pay bills very often, rarely cleaned the house, sometimes stayed in bed for days and often burst into tears if I raised any of these problems with him.  Eventually we broke up; it was my house so he moved out - and within a fortnight had got a job, sorted out a new flat and was out with his friends several nights a week.  He had suffered from depression, that was very evident - but it was also apparent that it suited him to let me carry the weight of all the 'boring but necessary' stuff that goes with living together.  It's a hard line to tread, particularly for someone like yourself who is so sensitive and compassionate to other people's needs.  So I think you're on the right path when you talk about focusing on your own boundaries and being able to walk away if/when necessary.

I did read a very good book years ago:  "Sensory Perceptual Differences in Autism and Asperger".  The author is Olga Bogdashina; she's a doctor with two autistic children, I think.  I found it so helpful in understanding my own son's sensory experiences and it helped me figure out when he genuinely can't do something and when he doesn't want to (and sometimes him not wanting to is fine, I just like to know which is which).  I only mention it as you casting your eye over it might make some things make a bit more sense.  Things that you mentioned in another post about not noticing facial expressions, I think it was, or picking up on non verbal cues are also things that aren't a possibility with some autistic people; the wiring in the brain needed for those things is different (I seem to remember a study where they were able to track where people were looking when engaged in a conversation with someone they cared about.  The autistic and non-autistic people looked in completely different places - all looked at the face but the brain was focusing on different parts so some of the facial expressions that non-autistics picked up didn't register, whereas the autistic people noticed some things the non-autistics didn't.  Not better or worse, just different).  Anyway, I just thought I would mention it in case you need something else to read while you're isolating :) 

I hope you are able to find a path through it all.  Nothing comes easily, it seems!  Lol xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on May 27, 2020, 12:51:06 PM
Thanks, Tupp! That's a really interesting train of thought.

I've often thought there's something off about his perception (trouble with eye contact, difficulty focusing on a speaker, etc). It's hard to imagine someone SO gregarious not being good at "social cues" but I think he's really not. Interesting.

Yesterday he and my good friend, the poet, both came over and both had said they were STARVED for social contact. We did one of the sit-eight-feet-apart wine chats and it was a lot of fun. They're both story tellers. One thing I noticed was that as she was talking (she's much more halting in her speech but very intelligent and interesting, with an academic family and similar cross-cultural dislocation to M's) -- he was literally TWITCHING (physically) to break in.

He managed to be courteous but still talked 80% of the time. His stories were fun and fascinating and she clearly enjoyed listening to him. But I know her well and know she observed in person the pattern of talk-dominance I'd vented to her about. She wasn't angered by it but surely spotted it. I made the choice to not even try to tell stories of my own, and I also enjoyed his.

The literal twitching and his body nearly jumping in the chair to interrupt were just so visible to me. I would occasionally gently lean toward her and ask a followup question, and M seemed to catch the hint and subside for a moment.

All in all a pleasant time, and also very illustrative.

Thanks for the book suggestion, too.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on May 28, 2020, 12:05:47 PM
It's all a continuum, isn't it?  I used to have a friend, nice lady, but talking to her was exhausting because I wouldn't even be half way through my sentence when she'd be jumping in, either telling me what to do (if it were a problem) or starting in with a similar story of her own.  She literally didn't seem to be able to wait until I'd finished speaking before she spoke and as a result the conversations were very jarred - I'd say my half sentence, she'd jump in ("you need to call x department about that"), I'd say, "yes, I've called x department and they said......." and again before I'd finished speaking she'd jump in to tell me what they should have said and we just never got anywhere.  It's tiring.  It's interesting that it's a physical movement for him to jump in and that you can actually see that happening.

There is another aspect of autism called masking (I'm just chucking these things in as food for thought, not to say I think this applies to M or that you should ignore anything he's doing).  Some autistics can cover the fact they don't pick up on the social cues, facial expressions, turn taking in conversations and so on because they can mimic other people's actions (I think I've done it most of my life).  And it's exhausting and can lead to meltdowns, depression, burn out and so on.

I think, in the nicest way, that whether M's problematic aspects are due to some neurology that he has no control over or not, the key thing is what you are happy with.  Someone I know is with a man who drives her mad and she wanted him assessed for autism because she said if he is autistic she'd be able to tolerate him better.  I just found the idea of 'tolerating' your life partner the sadness thing I'd ever heard.  Putting up with some bad habits, yes, we've all got those, but 'tolerating' being the best she could hope for was heartbreaking to hear.

And slightly on that note - I did want to ask a question just because I noticed you said that you "made the choice to not even try to tell stories of my own".  I mean this question in a kind way, Hopsie, but did you not want to tell stories or was it just to difficult or exhausting to try to get yourself into the conversation? xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on May 28, 2020, 12:28:43 PM
Hmmmm. Possibly irrelevant thought:

due to the asyncronous nature of texting, email, posting online - it doesn't matter if one waits their turn to speak or not. One can simply get things off their minds.

Of course, even in this communication environment - misunderstandings and lack of context occurs because people don't wait their turn (or read everything, maybe more than once to understand) before posting.

Just a fleeting thought that may or may not apply.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 16, 2020, 07:41:03 AM
This is an interesting commentary, dunno why I didn't dig in. Thanks to you both.

At one point I found that emailing (at its peak) was a big danger zone for me, in relationships. It still is. For example, I recently explained I needed to withdraw from communication, email or phone, for a day to think and write and M still couldn't resist punching through with an email and a pretext--so I called him on it very gently, in T. He had replied "Understood" but later poked the boundary anyway (in a very minor way compared to how he used to). After that all passed we were having dinner last night and he says, "I think you're *catatonic sometimes". I later wrote him (email!) that that word landed wrong, and he wrote back the classic non-apology apology: "I'm sorry if you took it the wrong way, it was hyperbole of course" which by using blaming language rendered it a non-apology. So I've just written him back to explain that.

All to say, it would have been better to tell him how I felt in person because email often makes conflict or disagreement creepy. Or makes it escalate. Sometimes in certain moods or about certain subjects for me, the computer feels radioactive.

It's not a big fight or anything. Just noticing... M does have a difficult time apologizing. When I am around someone who can simply and sincerely say, I'm sorry, I know I'm with someone who's does real interior growth and gets it. People who can't often are shame-driven but may not know it.

*He was referring to a long explanation I'd given, before my retreat and again in T, about why I need those times sometimes, to get into a deep stillness/silence to think or write. The deeper layer, I think, is that it triggers his abandonment stuff and he doesn't really want to focus there.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Meh on June 18, 2020, 03:53:11 PM
due to the asyncronous nature of texting, email, posting online - it doesn't matter if one waits their turn to speak or not. One can simply get things off their minds.

I don't wait my turn when on Skype with or text with others, one never knows if a person will be gone for 5 minutes or away for 30 minutes, time can seem irrelevant though I would say some people actually try to have conversations on chat. Then again some people tend to do it out of boredom and I'm not sure if that is always the best way to interact with people. But maybe boredom is just a bad word for down-time.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Meh on June 18, 2020, 03:54:48 PM
Wow Catatonic sometimes is a strong statement. I guess he is frustrated and needs more attention.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 18, 2020, 05:40:08 PM
I think he'd be happy with 24/7 attention, unless he's scholaring.
I ain't giving it.

We had a pretty calm talk about it, and I got to explain there were two sides to why that remark stung. One is that the "deep retreat" I can get into has two sides that feel vulnerable;

Side One: It is the kind of near-trance stillness that sometimes produces my best writing and thus I feel very protective of it. Always had that need, always will. Margaret Atwood says: There's no such thing as writer's block, there are interruptions from other people.

Side Two: It is also on the surface just the same stillness as my depressive withdrawal into non-functional sedentaritude. I don't need a highly-executive personality yapping around my ankles with TIPS on ADD or such, I'm working on it in therapy.

And sometimes I can't tell the difference. But I'm glad he heard me out last night and seemed to be respectful of me. I was defending my important boundaries but without hostility (or sarcasm, like here...).

Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on June 20, 2020, 11:24:19 AM
I am just coming up for air Hops. Buck left yesterday and then I spent all day with Hol in hospital; she fell - onto one of the rocks around here and broke 4 ribs. Up late last night for required me time - and that retreat you speak of.

I just wanted to share how I frame my own version of the "retreat". Maybe there's something useful in it?

Side one - is well-known to me. It's my painter's trance; where I'm able to become "one with the void"; enter the zone. It's a necessary balance point for me - because of how busy my mind is.

Side two - is necessary for me, because I have such "melty, fusible" physical perceptions and it's very very easy to establish a sort of Vulcan MindMeld in situations with others - on those non-verbal levels. Problem IS, of course, the inescapable imposition of my own interpretation on others. I usually have to pull back, re-establish my skin location and ordinary "personal space" (or distancing)... and then engage brain & mouth to query the other person about the accuracy or validity of my other perceptions. Otherwise I'm PRESUMING and ASSUMING way too much.

I'm told this is a problem for some empaths - not that I claim that label. Definitely have that tendency and some aptitude. But I'm more like a loose cannon that depends on luck and synchronicity... than any kind of intentional, directed force.

Anyhoo... that's my framework for what sounds similar. Chuck it, ponder... whatever.
Hugs. I guess there's always more dance steps to learn.  :D
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 20, 2020, 03:46:46 PM
Amber, thank you.
It was so comforting to read your depiction of the artist's necessary trance (quite like a poet's), and its flip side...which is really just an individual PERSON's necessary solitude periods. You get it, so well.

Makes me mindful to recognize that underneath it all, I am also a weird kind of introvert. Just another kind of person who needs to tend to her separate self.

I'll respond about Hol's injuries (!!!!!!!) over on Farm Life.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 26, 2020, 03:55:10 PM
Well, there's a new how-de-do. I think it could bring us closer or the opposite, and am not too worried about the result. My part is my work, my awareness. His is his.

So....I have gradually gotten increasingly frustrated about M's food obsession. In brief, it's as though obsessive and frequent talking about food (what he will cook, what will be in it, when he'll order ingredients and from which store, what time he'll start the dish, etc -- followed by a deeee-tailed recitation of the preparation once I'm there and a slow plodding repeat of all the steps/ingredients/sources, etc during the meal--while he groans in pleasure as he eats--.... and it's become fossilized). So I recently told him something I'd love a lot would be if the next time I come to dinner he not email me about the food or the cooking during the day, and not tell me anything, and just let me enjoy the surprise meal when I'm there, when I'd be delighted to hear all about it.

He goes, "Understood! XXXXOOOO." Then that afternoon, he sends another email: I did this, and that and got the other thing done! And now I'm ready to COOK!! (It's as though no matter what boundary I ask for, he's going to poke it, often subtly. So I'm learning not to trust him when he says Yes, Understood, or similar.)

Long (and riiiiidiculous) story shorter -- I've also told him I'm avoiding bread and white flour right now (gained weight). But he keeps setting bread on my plate or adding croutons to salads (he still occasionally tries to pour me more wine despite all THAT discussion). Anyway, went over for dinner and the MOMENT I came in the door he launched into his obsession like a fancy waiter: "This is a thick sort of soup, Hops..." and I wanted to screeeeeam. I hadn't even had time to set down my bag.

And then, perched as I always am at the counter to chat and listen while he "narrates" the meal...(but I was willing)...I look at my bowl and....(drumroll!).... there are croutons in the bottom. Reflexively, without thinking (I thought he was about to pour the hot liquid in) -- I reached over and snatched them out of the bowl and put them on the counter. BUUUUUT....they're not croutons. They're lovely little cubes of baked tofu. Oops! And M is (justifiably) pissed! It was a rude impulsive move on my part and when he said, "I'm annoyed!" I thought, bravo! Then he goes on to say in detail what I should have done instead: inquired, confirmed what they were, (or IF croutons, reminded him), etc. Like a grownup. And I completely agreed, recognized what I'd done wrong and why it was a rude and inappropriate move, and apologized. About three times.

Finally during dinner I said M, I've agreed and apologized repeatedly but you're not letting it go....can you let it go now? He goes, Of course, it's over and done. Two minutes later he's eating and says, Oh I just got another mouthful of ha-ha ... crouton! Does that a couple times.

Then after dinner when we go to sit down and converse...he starts up with a mini-lecture on what's wrong with my character because I did that move, and my blood begins to simmer, and by the time he gets to "You're petulant" I, errrr, blew up.
"If there's one thing I am NOT it's petulant! I am honest and direct and I own my mistakes and am accountable, and I am capable of genuinely apologizing and I am absolutely NOT PETULANT!" And then I announced I still loved him but had to leave because I needed to cool off. Retrieved Pooch and left.

(What all that was, was what I WISH I'd been able to do in his jungle house when he did a similar--but more scathing--lecture about my defects after I'd pissed him off, when I didn't speak the language and had no way of just leaving, which I wanted to do. Rang the same bell.) Only two times this has happened.

Then once home I emailed him a calm, mature explanation of agreeing with him entirely that my gesture had been impulsive inappropriate and rude, that his annoyance was justified, but that I'd left because he wouldn't let it go and then had escalated into negative characterizations about who I am, etc.

He wrote back late that night: It's really okay, was just unexpected and unexplained.

So now my goal is to unload all this, without any anger, in therapy with him, to say that I'm worried about the food obsession and its effect on us, and I'm worried that when he says "It's okay" or "Happy to respect your request" but then doesn't...and how that impacts my dreaming about a lifelong commitment and how I manage my own frustrations better and don't get angry when if I'd said how I felt all along it'd be less intense. (All true. T thinks I need to speak up, and regularly.)

There we go. Sturm und drang...and All About Croutons. Exhausting. But funny in a way.

hugs and thanks for your patience!
Hops

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: CB123 on June 26, 2020, 11:22:36 PM
Hops, I actually would have loved to have seen your face when you had an unexpected handful of tofu (who knew? Tofu in the bottom of a bowl? We used to make soup with tofu but that's a bit strange) Anyway, I would have laughed hard enough to fall off the stool. And I'll bet if he had reacted that way, you both would have been doubled over and it would have ended up making one of those secret stories that lovers have where one of you whispers "croutons" at a dinner party and the other starts snickering.

On the other hand, I'm imagining your thoughts whirring when you saw them in the bottom of the bowl. The first unconscious thought was " I can't trust him to not sabotage my food preferences, I need to protect myself".  That probably happened before you even had a conscious decision formed. I can see you trying to set up protection from the verbal onslaught--asking him to not email you with food details, or call you with them, or start talking about them. I sense that you are tense and on guard trying to protect yourself from that and from his unwillingness to honor your food and drink preferences. It seems that it puts you in a defensive mode in something that looks an awful lot like a power play on his part

I was thinking that, although I would also find that verbal barrage grating, it's a little sad that he is being asked to give up something he enjoys doing so much--it sounds like all the description and minute details are part of the cooking experience for him. I'm imagining that it would change his experience with preparing food by quite a lot and that biting his tongue will take out an integral part of what he enjoys.

I can picture what you want too-- a quiet glass of wine while you talk back and forth about your day. He's deglazing the pan and adding a bit of wine, and there's soft music in the background while you set the table and ask him how many forks you should put out. A completely different feel to the evening. Perhaps neither one is "wrong".

Maybe there's no bad guy here. Maybe what each of you want from the dinner experience is simply mutually exclusive. Maybe there is nothing he needs to change in therapy (nor do you).  As a compromise, I could see you taking turns making dinner and when he is in charge he does it loudly and full of gusto the way he enjoys, and when you make it, it's calm and conversational and relaxed. If he refuses to relinquish being in charge of dinner every time, or if you can't bear even one more evening with the verbal play-by-play, that probably tells you something important that you need to know.

CB


Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on June 27, 2020, 09:15:09 AM
What CB said :)  I have to say, though, - and I freely admit not being a foodie or being much into manners or proper ways of doing things - I wouldn't consider someone taking something out of their bowl (especially if it was because they thought it was something else) wrong, rude or inappropriate.  It just wouldn't register for me.  Seems like a very small thing to get upset about, with the caveat that I don't get 'foodie' stuff so maybe that's why it seems less of an issue for me.

I have a got a couple of friends who I love to bits but they are very foodie and, like M, will talk a lot about planning, prepping, shopping for ingredients, how it was all put together, how to serve it and so on.  I find it tiring to listen to.  I don't particularly enjoy food - I see it as something I need to do.  Things I really like are unhealthy so I try not to eat them too much.  I hugely appreciate someone else cooking for me - the kindness of it is the thing I love - but I'm just as happy if someone bungs a pizza in the oven or turns up with a takeaway.  It's the action of doing it that I love rather than the food itself.  I just don't find it interesting.  I think my palette is probably very unrefined.

Do you think he's got bigger stuff he wants to say, Hops, but doesn't feel that he can?  Or even know he wants to, really?  I'm just playing Devil's Advocate a bit.  There just seems to be a pattern (from the things you post) of him saying what he's supposed to rather than doing what he's supposed to (or what you ask him to, I suppose is more accurate).  And almost like he's pleased when you get something 'wrong' because it gives him a chance to critique you?  I don't really know how to explain it.  I just feel like when I read about 'crouton gate' it seems like there is something bigger than croutons?  I may have been in lockdown too long and be seeing things that aren't there.  Whatever it is, I hope you are able to get things sorted out.  And obviously ignore all of this if it's nonsense, I think I'm spending too much time talking to the cat :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 27, 2020, 11:52:46 AM
CB, your response sobered me, in a good way. You showed a lot of compassion for M. Cooking and food-obsessing is a big part of his "love language." He's said so: "This is how I show love for the people I love." So the struggle to balance appreciation and gratitude (this generous man is feeding me great meals!) with my inner aversion to the volume of attention he pays to it (and insists I pay in return) is difficult. I feel like such an ingrate.

The truth is, I have a deep recoil at times. It's not the topic but his obsessiveness around it that gets to me. My reaction isn't rational, it's visceral. I think on a deep dive I'd find it has something to do with my father. He was the main cook and also clearly had some version of OCD as M seems to as well. So even though I was desperate to help, all I could ever do was sit and watch Dad. I adored him and wanted to be part of it. M is similar in the kitchen, in that he has total control of absolutely everything that's happening, and no matter how often I ask, he wants to orchestrate every single step. One difference is that my Dad never lectured, narrated, or held forth aloud about every single aspect of his cooking, as M does. So even though it was frustrating not to be allowed to participate, I still was happy to be around my Dad.

It reminds me of M's "forced teaching" thing I described here at one point. I'd like to just enjoy a meal, ask a few appreciative questions about it and enjoy learning a bit. But not the entire Julia Child step-by-step recreation of every single thing that went into it. M's style of teaching is to go through each conceivable detail at microscopic level. "And then at 2:00 I took out a medium bowl and placed the whatever in it, to marinate in a blend of A and B and C and D and E...." So if I ask, what's that lovely XX?, I just get Too Much Answer. I also feel that my role is to clap. It's just hard. Doesn't mean it should be, but it builds up.

It's a weird response and I'm going to work on it. If I'm going to eat both greedily and gratefully at his house, I do think I should find a way to just accept that all the narration is the price of admission. The other day, when it started the second I stepped into the house (on a day when I'd asked for less of it), I think I couldn't handle it. I was on edge instantly, realizing nothing could really change.

Tupp, you're right. If I'd spoken up (a theme I have to work on) in a calm way, nothing would have happened. I actually *snatched* them out of the bowl, and suddenly. I think that's what upset him. There was no grace involved. He is very formal and fixates on the sort of ballet involved. Every meal is a production, with an audience. I understand it but find it the opposite of relaxing sometimes.

CB, you were also completely on target about the feeling of needing to protect my food and drink preferences because he often doesn't. Just subtly pushes things on me. He has a rigid sense of how each dish should be and it seems to cause him pain when I want to skip bread, refuse wine auto-refills, or do my own salad dressing because I prefer less. So there is chronic tension in me about what he's doing, and I guess my abrupt move with the non-croutons also came from that.

It's almost silly to micro-analyse a minor event like that, but it does seem to reflect a lot of things for me. And given that it culminated in him grinding away with a passive-aggressive commentary on my "character flaws" and me raising my voice and leaving.... I guess it contains truths to ponder. One of them is M's weight. I have never made any reference to it and would never shame him. But he is quite overweight, with a huge belly, etc. And when he insists that food is only about pleasure and celebration (but never makes a single reference to health), it troubles me. His meals he shares are both delicious and mostly healthy, but I believe he eats a lot of sweets alone. Not my job, but at times I feel inner tension over that too (I did spend years writing health books and nutrition things professionally). I've never been with a man as overweight as he is.

CB, your suggestion that I cook sometimes too is a good one. The thing is, I'm a much less relaxed cook for other people...it makes me tense. So to cook with M asking constant questions or also running commentary wouldn't be an easy choice. It's simpler to just be the non-cook in the relationship. But I could ask to negotiate with him that I be allowed to do the dishes. (He doesn't even permit that.) It'd make me calmer I think to have a role to play other than forced-student.

Quote
Do you think he's got bigger stuff he wants to say, Hops, but doesn't feel that he can?  Or even know he wants to, really?  I'm just playing Devil's Advocate a bit.  There just seems to be a pattern (from the things you post) of him saying what he's supposed to rather than doing what he's supposed to (or what you ask him to, I suppose is more accurate).  And almost like he's pleased when you get something 'wrong' because it gives him a chance to critique you?  I don't really know how to explain it.  I just feel like when I read about 'crouton gate' it seems like there is something bigger than croutons?

Yes, I think I've finally caught onto M saying the "right" thing in response to requests (even in T) but basically doing whatever he wants to anyway. The more depressing possibility is that M doesn't just have N-ish traits (as I do too) but perhaps he is far more narcissistic than I've been willing to face.

It seems odd, when I think of his emotional, vulnerable side. But if I'm honest, his emotional expression is usually all about his own feelings. He doesn't show much empathy for mine.

Sigh. I don't really know. But I've found myself watching a whole bunch of Dr. Les Clark videos (Surviving Narcissism on YouTube) lately. I don't know if I'm trying to confirm a fear or rule it out. No firm answer yet but a definite trend I need to think about very soberly.

Thanks guys. I will survive Croutongate! And maybe M and I will survive it together. I feel fortunate that I know we can dump it in the lap of the Sikh on Monday, and get some insight.

Much gratitude,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on June 27, 2020, 12:13:03 PM
Hops:

It seems like M's fairly entrenched in his NEEEEEED to talk about food.  Maybe.... OCD type stuff?

That he agrees, so quickly, to back off, then bolts forward again, with the behavior you've asked him gently to put down... means?  That he's unable or unwilling to put it down?  With his companion?  You're his companion.  He's used to behaving this way with his wife, I suppose.

The questions are....
can he learn to do something else?  Maybe look forward to keeping it all to himself, as you suggested, then "surprising" you with, and providing details in person.

Or...
can you get used to the chatter?

I have to say, although I might be happy to have someone cook gourmet me for me, I wouldn't be happy to be held captive by all the details either.  It's like hand holding, and ego massaging that's beyond me too.

I'm curious what your couple's T says and how he handles it. 

About your snatching food, and his reaction to it.

I think there was a conversation to be had about what was in the bowl. 

That you snatched it, IMO, spoke to M's trouncing your boundaries... about your feeling unheard. 

That M had the reaction he did speaks to his resistance to your having those boundaries.  As you've noted, he's very food focused.   He wants you to drink
more than you want to drink.

From here it looks like you missed an opportunity to be straightforward with him, talk about that, and figure out what was in the bowl, as you and M already agree.

Under it all is the unrest, feeling of boundaries being dishonored, feeling of having to be constantly on guard, and maybe that's both of you... M and Hops, for surely having to hold his tongue and NOT share foodies stuff feels like a burden to him, even if he's not succeeding.  He KNOWS he's failing, IMO.

Failing, for him, likely feels very bad and he doesn't want to face up to it or own it or change it, bc not doing it perfectly is already taxing him...  maybe.  I'm just throwing stuff against the wall here.  I can't be sure of one thing I've written. 

At first I felt he was bullying you over the tofu pawing incident, but I'm not sure it's that straightforward now.  It makes sense he'd try to change those behaviors, in you, that bring him discomfort and feelings of failure. 

Here's the thing that gives me pause.....
what if changing his behaviors,  and NOT talking compulsively is super difficult for him OR brings up feelings of abandonment he doesn't understand or have the coping strategies to deal with successfully yet.

I've always seen M in that light.... lacking coping strategies to deal with his young M's reactivity and feelings of abandonment that aren't right or wrong... they just ARE, until he figures them out with enough professional help and self awareness/reflection.

If he needs more support, that's different than his willfully forcing his way or the highway on you, iMO.

Is he bullying and picking fights?  I'd have to say, ya... he is.

Why is he doing it?  I'd say his younger M self is reacting, rather than his adult
 self by forcing you to take responsinilty for all the negative feelings, yours and his, and requiring you to TAKE responsibility and FIX it for him, and for yourself.

 Honestly..... what does that mean?  Nothing if it's not accurate, and the lovely couple's T knows the situation and you both pretty well.

Food for thought.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on June 27, 2020, 12:30:45 PM
Ok... I see you guys puzzled on this a good deal before I posted.

Hops... I dated a chef once, and it almost ruined cooking forever. 

It DID ruin golf, forever, bc he was so picky and wanted me to feel insecure.  He WANTD me to need him to do everything in the kitchen, which was how that went eventually.  I never thought about doing any food prep or planning again WITH him.

I stuffed all that, btw, and actually fed him a lovely meal I prepared for another boy, I wasn't actually dating, but who wanted to date me.  It was a huge FY, and he felt every inch of it, while I wasn't truly aware of it, on a conscious level... it just came out sideways. 

So....
food.
Ya. 

The trauma of food sensitivities, and health issues compounds things, as Tupp mentioned. 

It's perfectly reasonable for you to have concerns for M's health.  With your background, it's almost impossible not to, IMO. 

CB... you said a lot with fewer words.  I agree with it all. 

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 27, 2020, 01:56:04 PM
Lighter...but CB suggested maybe this doesn't even rank for a therapy session? Are you agreeing with that as well?

Confused.

Struggling.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on June 27, 2020, 02:11:15 PM
I'm saying the tofu isn't reason for a T session.

I'm saying what's beneath it, likely is.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on June 27, 2020, 02:30:42 PM
Hopsie, I wish I could say just don't think about it until you speak to the therapist again but I know it's almost impossible not to, especially with the current situation meaning it's not easy to pop out anywhere to do something to take your mind off it.

What I did want to say is, maybe, if possible, concentrate for a while on how you feel, overall, when you're with M.  Not the analysis or if there's NPD/autism/adhd/past problems/current problems and so on and so on.  My bottom line for relationships these days, platonic or otherwise, is that I want to feel safe and comfortable pretty much all the time.  A bit of insecurity or 'trying something new' I can cope with but overall I want to feel that I can be myself and be able to speak/do what I want or need to do.  Do you mostly feel safe and comfortable with M?  Mostly when you talk about him on here it's problematic but that might just be because you don't need to talk about the easy or comfortable bits on here.  If I'm honest it seems to me that you've put, and are putting, a huge amount of work in to just be able to share space with someone.  But that might be because I only know one portion of it (because much of it doesn't get written about online).  So it may be that view isn't an accurate one.  I'd really like you to be having relaxing dinners where you can slurp your soup and lob croutons across the floor and feed Pooch tidbits without anyone complaining about it.

I'm hopefully the lovely T will be helpful in shedding some light on it all.  And I hope you can get a bit of rest tonight xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: CB123 on June 27, 2020, 02:32:48 PM
Hops,
I think of therapy as something you do to get to the bottom of something in your psyche that needs healing. I guess the reason I said that is because I dont think either of you are doing anything that is unhealthy. The incessant talking about food is something he does because of who he is and your need for some calm and relaxation around food is who you are. No one needs to be fixed.

The fact that he doesnt respect your boundaries is another thing. You shouldnt have to guard your plate and your glass and your body from boundary breaches. You have definitely made yourself clear and he has definitely heard you. If you think that therapy is making an impact, that seems like something worth continuing with.

I wonder if taking the future off the table would help. What if you just enjoy each other's company without trying to change each other? No one is auditioning for a lifetime position, you are just having fun. You get together for as much as it continues to be fun. If you need to get away for some no contact time, let his calls go to voicemail and his emails go to spam. If that starts feeling weird (it is, he should be listening to you) then decide what you want to do.

He probably has some real issues that you as an empath are picking up with your spidey sense. I just wonder how satisfying it will be to spend the future trying to fix that. I dont get the impression that he is unhappy with the way he is or that he would have delved into his deeper motivations on his own. It's possible to really enjoy the company of a person in some situations and at the same time know that you don't mesh on some basic level.

I dont think that makes either of you a failure. Just not a good marriage prospect.

CB
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 27, 2020, 03:25:51 PM
Thanks, everybody.
I am going to ponder a while, and see how it goes.

CB, I'm not ready for a definitive conclusion about marriage, or about changing to "just friends." I know you care and I know the goodness and wisdom behind that conclusion. It's just not the question I want to answer right now. I might wind up in the same place, or I might not. I'm not ready to conclude (though it's on my mind).

Sigh. I'm trying to factor in a whole lot of things, only some of which I talk about often.

Boundaries, YES.
Assertiveness, YES.

hugs
Hops



Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on June 27, 2020, 04:20:31 PM
((((((((((((((((((((((((Hops))))))))))))))))))))))))))))  Just a hug from across the pond xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 27, 2020, 08:17:05 PM
Thanks, Tupp, hug received!

I understand, CB.
I have old-age security on my mind, too.
Whether I should or not.

I would like to marry again, for comfort
and happiness but also for security. I have
quite a few fears about how I'll wind up.

I may or may not find that with M but it
remains a goal if it's possible. If not M,
perhaps another person.

I'd rather remain alone than marry badly,
though, so we're on the same page there.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on June 27, 2020, 08:36:48 PM
Hops: 

When I read about your father and experience with him in the kitchen... I really thought about how that might impact your relationship with M.  I always think about things that keep our limbic systems primed and ready for blast off.  It's a what if? thing.  What if,  Hops didn't have that experience with her father?  Would she still have that emotional charge with M and food?

I'm willing to it has very little to do with your feelings, or everything or nothing at all.  I just want the truth to come out, be dealt with, and not be an issue anymore, if it IS an issue.

About M's obsession... and the way it stands with you... it's really a barrier to intimacy and shared fun around food.  It makes it difficult for you to enjoy a gourmet meal prepared for you...  no work on your part.  That's a think, IMO.  There's something under that, and I can't say what. 

I would hope M is trying to cultivate more intimacy and comfort with and for you, as a couple.  If he's not, then that's important to know.

He's making the rigth noises, but they dont' always line up with his actions.

Is that always true, or just part of the time, and if part of the time, what's it about?

Does he have control and ability to correct OR is he foundering a bit, and in need of more support and direction from a mental health professional?

He seems willing to see Ts and take direction... at least from where I sit. 

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on June 27, 2020, 09:03:29 PM
I'm late to the advice column Hops. So I'm not going to give you any.

Instead, I'm going to tell you what I've observed. And of course - it's my perception of what you've posted about here. It's going to be colored by my internal compass of things. It can, therefore be completely off base. Only you can decide that. My feelings won't be hurt, if you toss it in file 13.

This is not the first time you've reacted to a boundary issue. The croutongate incident was kind of the last straw; your diet being very personal to you and important to you. You've been ignored before, after receiving a pledge not to do so. Yeah - it was fried tofu instead. You misperceived that crucial detail in the moment. Most likely because before you set your bag down, he was already "force teaching" about his cooking and the meal. (Love that term, btw.) That in itself was a boundary violation. I'm not surprised that the misperception of the bowl contents happened; you were already triggered.

And this isn't an occasional problem. It seems to be (to me) an inherent disconnect in the relationship between you two. A pattern. Therapy isn't going to fix this overnight, I don't think. M seems unaware or unconcerned about how this "tic" of his that he can't control, affects other people. I don't know him; I can't say one way or the other with any certainty. But I can imagine feeling (if I were in your shoes) that what was important to me, didn't matter to him enough - to at least try harder. And I can imagine that feeling bringing up a lot of other thoughts & feelings. (((((Hops)))))

That's what I've seen. I won't compare experiences or go any further with this, unless you want to explore some options. I know you can work your way through this. Please just remember it can't always be one person doing all the heavy lifting in a relationship - trying to find a way to make it work equitably for both partners. I've not ever seen that formula lead to success and happiness.

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 28, 2020, 01:37:18 PM
You guys have all offered such insight and asked me so many perceptive questions.

I can't respond right away to each as you deserve, but want you to know how grateful I am.

I'm just weary toay, had trouble sleeping. M and I did connect today and I wrote out my interpretation of what the trouble is. Didn't dump it all on him but didn't back down on some boundaries that matter. Seeing him later to go see a historic place. We haven't done much outside our houses for months and I think that's been part of the tension buildup.

And this Thursday I do have a housecleaner coming for the first time since March. It's filthy and I just faced that I need help. Knee, back and ADD. She is very responsible and takes every virus precaution you could think of. I'll stay out all day and maybe another day too, if I can stay comfortably at M's. We'll see.

I do have new sober thoughts about the future, about how willing (or able) he is to take the deep dives I think we'd need.

But one question, I think Tupp's--yes, most of the time I do feel safe and comfortable. The exceptions are painful but there is a lot of enjoyment as a base.

However, I do have new and I think realistic concerns. A lot will depend on our T process, and also on how much time I can/want to dedicate to this, and especially as y'all have pointed out, is M working as hard for us as I am?

I think he is trying, and his improvements appear sideways and after a week or so. I think he's slow to absorb psychodynamic information. If the Sikh can't get through to him I will probably give it up. But I'm willing to give it more time. Some.

More TK...

hugs and a grateful heart,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 29, 2020, 02:09:51 PM
Thanks, Lighter.
Sometimes it feels like bullying ("I'll talk at you nonstop even though I know it's uncomfortable for you") but then, other times, I wonder if it's neurological or related to undiagnosed OCD, which he says he "is." He even said "I'm an OCD control-freak perfectionist in the kitchen." (He allowed me to participate by chopping veggies last night, which was so much more natural to me than being pinned on a chair while he Julia-Childs). It was a little uncomfortable for him but he was good about it and we enjoyed an amazing omelet. I also asked if I could participate by doing dishes, if he'd show me exactly how he likes it done. Both things helped.

If it's neurological, then I want to develop more patience around it if I can do that while also caring for myself. He said once in T that he finds it very difficult to stop a narration if he hasn't reached the end, and the T said it's sometimes as though M has a tape in his head that is louder than anything I'm saying. That sounds very neurological to me, that his own ADD/attention issues mean he is listening to his own head just nonstop. Hence when I start talking, he's deaf.

If it's also or instead dominance, I want to retreat.

I think it's both at times, which makes it quite complex. Both T's will help. As you guys do! (Seriously, send me your bills....)

CB, thanks much. You really do keep me mindful of the cultural perspective, when it comes to male dominance. It's a big thing. That said, I don't think it would be the cultural differences that would end our bid for a future together. He is Americanized and Europeanized to a large degree, and also he questions and examines culture for a living. He doesn't believe in macho swagger. (If anything, the micro-cultures of wealth and power in his family, and Presbyterian modesty and frugality in mine, are where more of our contrasts originate.)

I completely understood where you got to with your M, and for your very good reasons. I believe you had a very loving relationship with him but understood entirely why you realized marriage or living together wasn't the answer for you two. He is lucky to have had you in his life as long as he did, and even vice versa. That he still tries to take care of you to this day by bringing bulk food now and then is very touching. What a sweetheart. I think I was half in love with him myself when you used to talk about him.

Your ability to let that relationship go took courage. And then there's the piece that is different in our lives...family and backup in life. I will figure that out eventually. I know close friendships make a huge difference, but also know they can weaken. The quarantine, plus folks using social media (which I don't), has brought some connections into sharp relief. No abandonments, per se, but a recognition that people may retreat into themselves not just now, but also as they get older and the struggle of daily life is harder for us all. So there's less effort to stay in touch.

Amber, your take on Croutongate was deft and extremely perceptive. The thing about boundaries and why I was triggered, was how that weird event felt exactly. Precisely.

Boundaries, how to set and hold them, and what it costs me stress-wise when he fires up his bulldozer (whether intentionally or obliviously) and drives over them, is probably the #1 thing.

I'm going to talk about it all today in couples T. BTW, I have now gotten upset with M THREE times this week. The second time was Saturday, when he suddenly out of the blue made a belittling comment about a poem of mine ("that poem was trendy and au courant"). When I said Please stop talking about my poem, I didn't ask for feedback, he kept saying "I do this for a living." [In hindsight, he might have been trying to be closer to me, as he'd offered feedback I invited him to, previously, and I'd been pleased with his insight. I think it some unconscious way he was trying to kindle that sort of thing--that he'd do a critique as he does all day long with students. Boy did it backfire. Not only was his comment this time unsolicited and supercilious, but he wouldn't stop. That's the core of it. He doesn't stop. So he kept talking about and justifying it and obviously insisting that he force-teach me in that moment .... and I blew up and left.

Later I spent ages writing him to explain why that had upset me so. That poets I know do not offer their work for feedback except voluntarily, and that his refusal to stop holding forth about it when I had asked him to stop....blah blah. And that I do NOT want feedback from him on my writing unless I ask for it, regardless of what he does for a living, etc. That this is a personal and protected space of mine, etc.

Yesterday (event #3) in the car on our outing, again out of the blue, he brings up the poem AGAIN and starts holding forth about it (he's judging it a good poem but was insisting on me hearing his analysis) ... and I blew up and yelled, top of lungs, STOP IT! I've asked you NOT TO DO THIS! Shook me to the core, as when I'm pushed to the breaking point...there it is. I can get angry.

So, bottom line, I think if I need to pick ONE thing that would (probably will) sink us forever or....if miraculously M is able to contain his impulses and respect a boundary when I ask him to.....it's boundaries.

I have reached the end of my rope and plan to explain that to the Sikh today. I'm not going to try to control anything about the session. I'll TRY to keep my descriptions brief of these 3 events, but basically what I've got to say is that I give up. I'm losing hope, I feel I'm/we're failing, and the stress of all this means that although I love M and am grateful for our relationship, I'm thinking we may not be able to get past this issue of respecting boundaries comfortably, without snark or payback. (That's where dominance may also come in. I just can't fathom why, as intelligent as he is, he can't assimilate something I've asked that's important to me, and let it go. He finally did manage to stop poking my daughter-wound, but that took me stress to the point of a stroke--I honestly believe that's why it happened.)

And I'll see what happens. I just want to own my end of it and leave M's to him and to the Sikh. Either I become capable of steady constant assertiveness and boundary guarding without undue stress, or I can't. It may be too much for me.

M is someone who cares about integrity and ethics in his professional and family life. That's genuine. So one small hope may lie in discovering whether or not some of his behavior is compulsive. I think he just doesn't see or hear me half the time, except as a gauzy woman he loves. One thing I may also mention is that the effect of the boundary violations is that in the moment, he always agrees. Certainly. I will do that. I won't do that again.

But I no longer can believe him. That's really it. That may shock or disturb him to hear, but it's the cumulative effect of my experience. He DOES mean it in the moment. But in action, he winds up firing up the bulldozer.

Can you believe I still love him? I do. I write here mostly about our struggles. But he has sweetness and a lot of light in him and a big capacity for joy. I enjoy him 70% of the time. It's just that the obstacles, I think, are coming into much bigger relief and I'm realizing something has to give.

I don't know what is baked in neurologically for him, or even for me, altogether. I don't know if he is able to counter it all, or if I am. It may be as simple as, love isn't enough (I knew that) and behavior is what we live with.

For me, blowing up and yelling in frustration and distress is a major thing. I can't live that way. I won't.

More TK after T, maybe tomorrow.

I am SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO grateful for all of you. I can't even express what a comfort this is. If we need to break up I'll be very sad but I also know I will ultimately be okay.

love and gratitude,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 29, 2020, 04:17:46 PM
I was trembling in T, it was hard to say it all. Had chest pain during. Fingers shook. But I did. The biggest thing being that I am overwhelmed, felt at the end of my rope, and don't trust that when I set a boundary it will be respected. It makes me feel frequently guarded or unsafe, despite love and affection. Also made clear I am not accusing M of malice, just that I do not feel heard or respected when his behavior ignores a boundary I've explained repeatedly and he's agreed to.

M was defensive, replied that he now feels unsafe too and repeated his accusations that I was "ill-mannered" (Croutongate) and a long justification about his opinion of my poem. What he missed was his insistence on delivering his opinion until he is satisfied even while I'm asking him to STOP. I think his may be feeling that pushing out his opinions (enormously rewarding professionally) works the same way at home. He is "right" and "brilliant" and accustomed to never being stopped.

What I couldn't get across was, I need to know I have the RIGHT (regardless of his interest or determination to talk to/at me about something) to say, I need you not to talk about this now. Or, please stop. This is a sensitive area that I don't want to share right now. Or whatever. I mentioned it had happened about my D, in bed, and over smaller boundaries.

T told me that anger is human, and three occurrences in a week mean I'm stressed. He told M that it's important to say "I'm sorry what I said upset you" (M rarely apologizes) and that checking in with me during his monologues would help. M said he needs a string around his finger. Sikh said, I want you to tattoo it on your hand.

I feel very drained and am relieved I won't see M until Thursday.

No idea about the outcome, not very optimistic, but a lot's out on the table anyway. T is away next week so it'll be a while. We'll find out how we do.

I really do think we need a breakthrough or we'll be over. Wasn't expecting it now but I guess things rise when they must.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Meh on June 29, 2020, 05:08:28 PM
I read you. No advice but I read you.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on June 29, 2020, 05:52:51 PM
M'dear... I hope you forgive yourself being angry. MAYBE M actually heard you that time about the boundary. As unpleasant as it feels to be angry - it's equally unpleasant to have direct requests or boundaries ignored. Bulldozed.I hope he didn't dismiss your genuine feeling of anger. And understand it.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 29, 2020, 06:32:05 PM
Thanks, (((((G)))))).
That's deeply kind, to tell me you hear.
I appreciate it and it's valuable. You are.

(((((Amber)))))
Thank you. You and a friend I called said the same, and I think after an hour's distress, I got it. I do forgive myself for getting angry. Sikh told me to understand the experience of anger FEELS bad, but it does not mean I AM bad. Aha. Ahahaaa.

I think I'll be okay. I'm much calmer now, even contemplating my capability to end this if I need to. But. We don't have another T session for two weeks, and I'm not going to pull the plug instantly.

I just recognize now that I can if I need to (iow, if I didn't get through to him). I'll find out. And probably pretty soon.

Many thanks again,
Hops

PS--No, he didn't seem to validate or understand my anger. Just focused on how in Croutongate, I'd been "ill-mannered." I think that's the explanation he'll retreat to, but am totally willing to be pleasantly surprised.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on June 29, 2020, 07:06:45 PM
So you took the forks back from the zombies and M stopped being so prim and proper and bent on SAYING "the right thing" all the time.  He spoke his truth, IME.  Refreshing if one is sick of hearing him parrot what is expected of him, when he doesn't understand it fully, IMO.  I don't know he understands how difficult a concept it IS to self reflect, consistently, check in with his partner, consistently, and STOP, when he's used to bulldozing through, no matter what. 

I see this as progress.  Things are getting real, and that's OK.  I hope you don't feel you have to forgive yourself, Hops.  You're human.  Your anger was self protection, and you have a duty to protect yourself.  The T said so. 

::nod::

It's likely things will take unexpected twists and turns over the next 2 weeks, IME. 

Try to drop expectation, get your nose off the crouton, and see the entire field,  Hops. 

Even if it's not OK....
it's OK.   

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 29, 2020, 07:38:32 PM
Thanks, ((((Lighter)))).

For this:

Quote
get your nose off the crouton

...you win my heart!

I loooove a consistent theme, and you're right!

Speechless. Delighted.
Hoping I won't get too stuck on future croutons!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: CB123 on June 29, 2020, 07:42:34 PM
Crouton gate is absolutely my favorite.

You've got this, Hops. I've had my share of screaming anger, and I must say it brought clarity to me at the time. Not sorry.

Love,
CB
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 29, 2020, 07:51:31 PM
Thanks, ((((((CB)))))) hon!

You're right. Even though it felt like an attack from parasitic Martians living in my spinal cord, that sudden fury (times three) this week really did bring clarity.

Reality is still my friend and I think my inner self rose up and smacked me upside-a da head.

Not pleasant, but ultimately it was probably a gift. Not probably. Really.

Q: When does life stop being a f***ing learning experience?
A: Never.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on June 30, 2020, 12:43:19 AM
OH PLEASE...  if we ever stop learning, just shoot me, OK?

Who'd a thunk my biggest challenge was just accepting being happy & loved & protected?
Pleasurable evening here. I have everything my little heart desires. Well, OK, maybe a saner economy would ease my OCD brain... but really, I have no complaints.

I have total faith in you Hops. You're going to find the right place to put your toes on the path... and walk it as you choose. You can DO THIS. Whatever comes. I KNOW you can.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on June 30, 2020, 10:34:56 AM
Aw, Hops.  I can understand that you love him and I really wish/hope that he can do something about his monologues and respecting your boundaries, because it does sound as if those bits are the sticking points and it's a shame he's not been able to get on top of that by now.  I suspect that at least if there were a bit of progress in those areas that you wouldn't feel quite so upset by it now (and you have every right to feel upset, by the way).

I think anger can be a good thing and I don't think women do it often enough.  For me it's always when my boundaries are transgressed and boy, how many times have I swallowed that down and just put up with someone talking over me, patronising me, ignoring what I say, feeling me up or whatever else.  I remember saying to a therapist once that I wanted to live a life without fear and he said that was dangerous; fear is your warning system, it's there to keep you safe.  I feel anger is the bedfellow of fear; it comes up when we aren't being heard and that can be dangerous.  So I'm glad you've forgiven yourself for feeling that way.  I don't think it was a bad thing.

FWIW my son does that having to finish what he's saying thing and with him, it is neurological.  I can manage it with him because he's my son so I don't expect him to meet any of my needs.  I wouldn't feel the same about that trait in a partner (and I only mention it because I know how tiring it is to listen to something that you don't want to, or even that you might want to but not right now).

I'm glad the lovely T is so helpful.  He really does sound like a good find.  I hope you are doing okay.  I'm glad the cleaning lady is coming this week - appropriate self care!  That's a good thing xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 30, 2020, 11:23:25 AM
Thanks for the faith, Amber.
From someone as strong as you, that's hopeful.
I really appreciate that.

Tupp, I think there surely is a neurological component about
some of the rituals and some of the obliviousness.

An additional cause might be Nism a lot more profound
than I'd allowed myself to consider, but I can't/shouldn't try to
diagnose. N-ISH stuff I can handle in some degree. The whole
enchilada, IF that's what this is, I probably can't and shouldn't.

A way some of the behavioral stuff unmoors me and creates
anxiety and stress is that I've come to face that M having made a
promise or an agreement or a commitment about a boundary I'd taken
care to explain was v. important to me--doesn't really mean anything.
He'll break it or push against it or toy with it whenever he wants.

Instead of judging him for it, because I may not fully understand why
he does this...I just need to take care of myself. Evidently, I have a
breaking point and I don't want to visit it again if I can help it.

The ground doesn't feel very firm beneath my feet right now, but I'll
be okay. I'll be seeing him Thursday morning and perhaps on Saturday.
Curious to see how it will go.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on June 30, 2020, 05:57:11 PM
Blundered across this guy,
and though I'd maybe enjoy him
a couple times/day, not for long....

Still. Something about what he says
feels empowering.

Wonder what y'all think?

https://markmanson.net/self-awareness (https://markmanson.net/self-awareness)

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on July 01, 2020, 01:42:08 AM
::Erasing post I've worked on and off on today::.

This guys just said what I was trying to say and a whole lot more.

He didn't refer to crouton gate, but he was:

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on July 01, 2020, 01:49:51 AM
::Erasing post I've worked on several times today::.

This guy just said what I felt was important to say, and a whole lot more.

He didn't refer to crouton gate, but he made me laugh, which I enjoyed more than editing down my super long, super earnest post, over and over again. 

Thank God you shared that, Hops.
Lighter





Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 01, 2020, 06:26:07 AM
I know it's early yet, but I wondered how you're feeling now Hops?

Anything morph, transform or dissipate yet?
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 01, 2020, 11:40:00 AM
Thanks for checking, Amber.
Well, the truth is I spent many hours recently watching the Surviving Narcissism series on YouTube, a Dr. Les Carter. He's a Christian counselor in Texas which normally would send me screaming (the last time I trusted a Christian counselor he practically shoved me into a disastrous marriage since he was so uncomfortable about my single sex life). BUT...Carter seems kind and rational and quite knowledgeable. Doesn't mention his religion (I googled him). He's got a narcissism-counselor industry going on, and there are lots of crappy ones. Still, I'm inclined to trust him. Would love to know what y'all think. His videos are basic and not long.

It's easier to think of M as Carter refers to it...having "highly narcissistic traits" rather than dubbing him "NPD" which isn't appropriate to do to anyone if you're not a professional, I suppose (unless that person is a powerful famous example who's trying to destroy the country, should there be anybody like that in the news).

Anyway. Although I'm seeing M tomorrow and Saturday, the truth is I've been thinking pretty calmly that this relationship is winding down (for me). M just sweetened up again (of course) and is sending charming messages, little offers to do this or that. The love-bombing begins. I remember clearly the cycle: Love-Bomb, Devalue, Discard. I don't think M would discard me as he's pessimistic about finding a new partner and always says I'm THE one, etc. But I might be wrong. He might get right out there again.

If we do get to the denouement, it's not going to be fun, and I sure won't race out there again. How would you date with masks on, anyway? LOL. But eventually.

Although I'd be pleased and amazed to see sudden self-awareness or apologies or insight from M, I'm truly not expecting any of that. Last couple of days after a few talks with friends, I've found myself thinking about being on my own again pretty calmly. And unless there is some astonishing turnabout from M, or some serious accountability for his contributions to the distress....then I don't want to live with or marry this man. And because of how N-ish people classically react to breakups, if I get to that decision, it would be better to make a clean complete break, rather than a wobbly "let's be friends" compromise. Everything I've read or watched suggests that an N-ish person will absolutely exhaust you with maneuvers and strategems to get your attention back or restart things at the level they want them to be.

I'm a little stunned but also relieved that I'm thinking clearly for a change. I think the subliminal constant stress of M's personality (much of which he cannot help) has contributed to brain fog in me. I can feel that diminishing just at the idea of moving on, even though I haven't stepped across the bright decision line quite yet.

I think CB was onto something when she said the times she erupted in anger gave her clarity. It doesn't make my lack of adequate assertiveness M's fault, nor is it his fault I didn't have a mature response in the moment, but I do feel as though a large industrial fan has blown through my head.

Good boundary-tending is intentional and sometimes difficult work even in the most ordinary of situations. With a bullish, obsessive, brilliant and competitive personality like M's, it may just be too advanced for me. It's not worth my serenity or my health, even if I do wind up in a crap nursing home (very likely, unless I manage to off myself peacefully first when I'm 89). I think I'd be better off with someone who's mellower. Buck's lazy twin brother.

I'll talk to my own T this afternoon, too. That will help.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 01, 2020, 12:23:13 PM
Seriously, people.
This is very important.
I too can be obsessive.

The thing is, I cringe to inform you,
Croutongate is ONE word.

We shall royally grant you the option of
whether or not to capitalize it, like Watergate.
We are kind that way. It's a royal trait.

[I actually just emailed the guy with the funny
intersting website to explain that he had a line
in the Three Levels of Self Awareness article where
he goes, What are your ticks? I could not rest. I
HAD to tell him ticks are bloodsuckers but he
meant tics (twitches). I tried to be funny. But now
you see the compulsive editoritis, embarrassingly.]

We perhaps have better things to do, such as remove
some of the acres of horizontal-surfaces clutter and mess
that Must Be Gone by 9am or all is lost when the palace maid
comes, because she won't be able to do anything other than
push around the little animals that are all over the floors. These
are the result of an unplanned breeding experiment between
dog hair clumps and dust bunnies. We have probably tried that
little witticism here before but prefer to disavow Our senility.

I love you guys.

Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: CB123 on July 01, 2020, 01:00:47 PM
Definitely a needed correction! Croutongate it is (although I personally would have preferred Tofugate since, if they had been actual croutons, your response would have been unimpeachable!) (See what I did there?)

CB

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 01, 2020, 01:39:02 PM
I doooooo see what you did there! LOL!

I really miss my VESMB emoticons.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 01, 2020, 03:58:35 PM
The royal proclamation has been heard!

Further attention to flat surfaces will be promptly accomplished for the sake of their calming "space". (And hiding the "evidence" of things we know aren't really - but MIGHT BE important - should the laser focus return to cull the wheat from the chaff.

ROTFLMBO Hops... this is a good sign. As is your calm contemplation of alternatives to continuing to struggle with this. I still believe you can find your best path forward for you.

Now, time to hunt dust wabbits!!
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on July 01, 2020, 04:25:01 PM
Yeeeeee, Hops.  You're so much more relaxed... just, more you again.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 01, 2020, 05:09:47 PM
Thanks, Lighter!

Amber...waaaay back on Sept. 25th, you wrote this (and occasionally something similar):

Quote
I saw some disturbing patterns emerging in your recent description. Disturbing for me; if I was in your shoes. I'm not going to go into them because you seem to be trying sort out the "why" or reason behind them yourself; quite well actually. That reason will be damned important going forward.

Do you feel ready/able to tell me more about that? I'd appreciate it.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 02, 2020, 11:17:43 AM
I mighta just been a pompous, defensive, ass saying something like that. And tired of getting crucified (as it so often occurs around here at the farm) for my simple observations or personal opinion. Even after it's been solicited. I've gotten pretty good at saying something, without "saying" anything.

But I believe (without looking back at what was going on) that you were already struggling with him talking over you; just ignoring your requests; doing what you'd already explained you didn't want or didn't like. And apart from melodramatically slapping him (a la old fashioned romance novels) I was pretty sure that you weren't going to be able to get his attention long enough for him to realize that these things are REALLY IMPORTANT to you - and no one can say they should or shouldn't be. And realize that wanting you to be happy enough to be with him - he might need to incorporate your wishes into how he behaves with you. (And why, o universe, don't some people already have that instinct??)

And you're so patient Hops; you kept trying till you cracked. Giving him chance after chance.

I think I was wanting to say - you shouldn't have to work THIS HARD on the little things. And that perhaps these little things are simply inherent incompatibility that no amount of therapy will overcome. If that appreciation for you - and respect for how you want to interact with people, including him, isn't there now - I just don't think that's teachable.

All these months later, you're still struggling with this. I dunno about you, but I don't want to have to retrain, housebreak a man just to be able get along on a daily basis. And the romance and attraction dissipate, if I end up with a custom-trained "pet on a leash"... instead of a man, who's free and already compatible with my quirks... and wants to be with ME, without trying to do exactly the same thing - re-educate me, train me to suit him. When do you get to the actual living and being with each other part? Enjoying yourselves? Together?

It absolutely pains me, to say this by the way. You DESERVE someone who cares enough to freely give you what you need & want from your partner sometimes, and not always expect you to be the person giving; bending; meeting his needs/wants. A relationship language shouldn't feel like an "acquired skill". Or performance metrics. Or constant critiques or analysis.

And like I said - this is through my rose-colored glasses of what I want in a relationship. Other people can make other kinds of decisions, for more practical reasons. That's their perogative and I can't judge that. And even when security was high on my list of wants from a relationship, it didn't outweigh this basic compatibility between personalities. For me.

And I just caught it - Sept 25th was Mike's & my wedding anniversary date. Not that it means anything in this context.

I dunno Hops. Perhaps I've been exceedingly lucky (or deluded! always possible) and am just a crazy old romantic. Love and relationships do require some work - from time to time. But that shouldn't be the daily existence experience. After all I've lived through, I don't want to have to work that hard. Either all that is there at the get-go, or is quickly agreed to and maintained... no sweat... or it's not. And it DOES happen that one falls in love with a person who's just naturally compatible.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 02, 2020, 06:21:11 PM
I cannot thank you enough for this caring straight talk, Amber.

Literally cannot because I was just out in a friend's mountain
back yard drinking...a fair amount of....lovely wine.

When my eyes uncross I will write more on this, but again, I
so appreciate your perspective. A lot. Nothing unkind about it.
Just the facts, ma'am. (Pompous? NO!)

No forced decision but I sure do have ease around the idea of
letting things take a different course. We'll see how that weathers.

Gratefully,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 02, 2020, 07:05:36 PM
Pro tip: take an ibuprofen before bed.  ;)
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on July 03, 2020, 01:12:45 PM
Hops:

I see this time as dyin time.... for M to GET SOMETHING out of his personal T sessions, or not.  The couples's T can point him in a direction,  but he's not able to DO THE WORK with him.  I see your work with the T as help pointing out sign posts.  Identifying things, with help, and a controlled safe space for you to say what you can't say with M.... on your own.  You're doing that.  It's successful in that you've gained plenty of information, shared information and set goals M can reach or NOT reach.  You're close to figuring this thing out, bc everyone is finally laying their cards on the table, IME.  That's all information everyone needs to reach important conclusions. 

If I had to guess about what M talks to his T about, it's stuff like how he  feeeeeeels  about living with a mate who isn't as affectionate, available, happy to BE in his sunlight..... than he'd prefer. 

How he deals with his frustrations, fears and heartbreak, for surely there's pain and heartbreak involved.  Suffering. 

I don't know if his T is correctly gathering information, gleaned from shared T sessions, as to what's at the root of the problems, rather than faffing about with his frustration over the symptoms.

At some point, it might be good for the Ts to have a little chat, IME and sooner than later. 

In my world, Ts speak to each other and share information, bc there are goals to understanding what's going on.  That might not be the case with this kind of situation, but I have to wonder why not, be that the case.

I hope your entire day goes well. 

::thinking of you::

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 03, 2020, 02:25:39 PM
Ibuprofen took, Amber. And it helped!
What comforted me about your post was how direct it was, and how you really acknowledged how hard I tried (not being the angel and him the debbil, but how very hard I've worked for quite a while in hopes of a breakthrough). IF (still not at final decision!) I do decide to bless 'im and let 'im go, your take gives me dignity and calm about it. I feel understood, big time.

I very much do not want to villainize him. I just think I'm at this basic place (well, good luck guys, what I of course mean by that is the insight o' the day, which could change tomorrow....you all are SOOOOOO PATIENT...... Two things:

1) I've come to think that neurologically, the H in ADHD is driving a lot of M's behavior, chiefly the compulsive talking over, talking nonstop, inability to listen. I read up recently on the H in ADHD and turns out, compulsive talking is a common symptom. That tilts toward the issue not being all about Nism, but a condition. I don't really care to drill into how his brain works further because it's not my place and not my job. And the prospect is exhausting, unless HE took it on, willingly.

BUT: If I could in Sikh-T next time say what I'm thinking, and just ask if M is open to evaluation and treatment for that specific issue (talking and listening problems), I might hang in a while. That would be amazing. (Expectations dial turning low.)

2) Whether it's about monster N-ego or entitlement or whatever, doesn't matter. BUT the fact that on occasion when pissed, M goes into a cold cerebral negative narrative about my character, which rocks my sense of self, ever again....I'd want out. That behavior simply be something he'd have to OWN, which is extremely difficult for him. I'm kidding myself, most likely. Won't fit his self-image at ALL.
(But too bad. That's his work if he's up to it...and I think chances are looow that under the stimulation of being frustrated or pissed, he'd have the insight to catch and stop himself before he goes to omniscient professor bullshit response/defense.)

On balance, I think realistic pessimism is my most appropriate course. But these two things, and only these...might possibly be reasons not to exit right away.

Thank you, for seeing what I've been doing with such empathy.

Lighter, I thank you too, for a ton of insight and ideas. Really GOOD ones. I think the only place where I flail away a bit is that although I genuinely love your empathy for M's experience (you've been extraordinary about that), I feel that maybe you identify more with his struggle than with mine.

NO foul! You are a fighter, a warrior woman, and deeply interested in how brains and nervous systems work. You are powerful and practiced in strength and power in ways I am not. So it's completely natural that you'd intuitively understand the more driven, powerful personality in this couple most readily. I am very grateful you have!

But, weird as I is -- I really, actually, am about his opposite. A "HSP" (highly sensitive poet) somewhat exhausted by the last decade (or two), and not strong, and weary, and 70. Although I'd love to take on the highly-focused, powerful observational/strategic exercises you suggest...I really don't think I can. I know my limits and mental proclivities. I'm in the FEELING garden, not the brain one.

You awe me, Miz Lighter. I really value your ideas. And please undrestand when occasionally a behavioral or observational template you suggest about M isn't quite in my wheelhouse. I'm working with uber-sensitive underwater currents that are 90% emotional, not scientific or athletic! But I'm grateful every time I read your insights.

YOU are the one who's hauling in the massive tuna that could feed us all. And wow. I'm a little feeder-fish, getting nutrients.

hugs
Hops
 
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 03, 2020, 04:31:26 PM
Did you happen to notice me flinch before I launched into being direct, Hops? LOLOLOL.
Way too often lately, I've been asked - nay, it's been demanded of me - that I be that direct and the result was having to take on defensive measures against a direct attack on me - for doing as I was bid. (The damned if you do/don't... double bind situation.)

I think after some of the things I've experienced I've developed an allergy - at least a sensitivity - to that phenomenon of running around in circles of criticism - disappointment - shouldering the work in a relationship without reciprocity. So I recognize that pattern more easily.

Doesn't mean either of you are flawed in any way; just that you're trying too hard to make something work that will always need that level of effort. Then, the question is, if both of you have the energy for it - and ultimately, want that for some reason. Hey - some people DO; whatever floats their boat. I won't try to change them.

That's just not for me anymore. ;)

Glad the ibuprofen helped! SOMETIMES ya just gotta let the inhibitions drop and hold forth.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on July 03, 2020, 06:05:12 PM
I have compassion for your side, Hops.  If there's any way for you to enjoy this man, and the safety and companionship of shared life with him....
then....
I say find out if it's possible with economy of motion and keep moving, whichever choice you make.

No regrets. 
No wondering if there's an overlooked pebble left on the field.


Hear Ye, Hear Ye

Today let it be known Friend Lighter has Friend Hops' interests in mind, ONLY, regarding Subject M's possibible ability to cultivate self-awareness and to self reflect for the sole and strict purposes of being a more balanced and joyful companion for Friend Hops.

Lighter cares not at all for Subject M's ability to get his nose off the damned crouton IF it doesn't serve Friend Hops.   

So sayeth Friend Lighter.
Amen or...
::possibly genuflecting::

 



Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 03, 2020, 07:12:00 PM
Thanks, ((((Lighter)))))!

There may be an overlooked pebble,
and I have found the only two that I can make out (latest post on Relationship).

I accept I have hit my own wall and am relieved to back away from analysing.
I'll point out the two things I can, if I can get them out, and then releeeeeeeease.

Do not want to be vigilant about where he is in his growth process or what he's ready or not ready to do or try or think. It's taken all I got to do/try/think all I have for the last year and a half.

At this point in my life, that's not my primary work. That is instead, about me. My writing, my peace, my purpose. I really have accepted it might be better to be on my own.

So the rest is just be honest, state what I believe, and accept whatever he does or doesn't do about it. He has a right to his own limits too.

Still love the person. He just may not be my mate. And that's okay if that's how this turns out.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on July 03, 2020, 10:06:07 PM
Sounds reasonable, (((Hops.)))

All you can do is SEE what's there, accept it, and take care of yourself, which I think you're doing an amazing job of.

Dropping expectation might make it easier to SEE. 

Light

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 04, 2020, 07:59:42 AM
I think that's true, Lighter,
that expectations can get in the
way of seeing reality.

As to whether standing up for
myself is fighting...it is for me, ime.
The stress of needing to do so feels
the same. Relaxed assertiveness isn't
fighting but it's hard for me to maintain.

Adrenalin, drama and hyperbole...ooof.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Meh on July 05, 2020, 03:21:21 AM
Weekend lover only. Space. Slow it down?


Actually I don't know, I'm no expert.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 05, 2020, 07:46:25 AM
I've been pondering "relaxed assertiveness" - and what that might feel like Hops.

Best I can come up with is Greta Garbo's famous line - "I vant to be alone". But then, that seems too aloof and I don't get the sense you're aloof or closed off. Maybe some of Cercei's comments in Game of Thrones? (There always seemed to be venomous sarcasm in her lines tho; veiled threats).

I don't think standing up for oneself is fighting either; but sometimes it is the last step before fighting/arguing. The ever-popular (in my mind anyway) third path - is to simply become unavailable/walk away/don't be there. Sometimes that works; sometimes it doesn't and like it or not - one is going fight.

Just to throw even more goodies in our framework for thinking about things... some time ago I got curious about archetypes. And the closest conceptual tradition I've found, is the idea of the Divine Masculine & Feminine. Pretty sure you'll quickly catch on how that idea shows up in various belief systems. And how it's sometimes been misused, too.

But the way that I'm thinking about it, is that all of us have both masculine and feminine characteristics. Where we manifest the divine positivity/creativity or nurturing principles through our being. It's never a static energy either; so that makes it a tad tricky to nail down. Hol & I, I know for a fact tend to carry more testosterone hormone in our makeups... and so we often manifest the more masculine principles too. The tomboy phenomenon is the stereotype.
But Artemis, is the archetype.

That's all preamble to simply saying: I think "RELAXED assertiveness" might be considered a masculine (in the non-sexual definition) characteristic. And it comes from an inner confidence (maybe) that one can physically back up the intent behind the assertiveness. This theory is still all speculative; I haven't studied it IRL - anecdotally - enough to see how people actually manifest this.

There is an argument however, for assigning that phrase, to the feminine side too. An old cliche is that women hold all the "power" in relationships - and the reasons given are all over the map. So, again... that would be a self-confidence based in knowledge (secret or admitted) of ability.

I dunno... those are just some of the thoughts floating around in my busy noggin these days. I offer this as maybe another way to think about what you're experiencing... and we all know, maybe it fits and maybe it doesn't.  The words, "relaxed assertiveness", just struck a "feeling" chord here... I know how it feels, but I don't have enough experience of it, to date, to KNOW it well.

ugh..... rambling again.... LOL.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 05, 2020, 09:15:40 AM
Thanks, Amber. I really like your rambles!

It's funny, though. I let the Sikh know early on that I (because: me, that's all -- personal history) felt quite uncomfortable with most religious language, and that included him talking about the divine in everyone. He was perfectly fine with that. Then later as he began talking about how this would happen because I'm a woman or that would happen because M is a man...I piped up that I really hate stereotypes that explain what's happening between people in gendered terms. And he was perfectly fine with that, although he said nope, he does see couples with these dynamics from his experience. (But he refers to gender-based explanations less now.)

So funny. I really like him a lot. And by the time I was done telling him what kind of vocabulary didn't freak me out (male privilege and male spiritual authority and all) -- it's a miracle (ha) we connect so well!

At the end of our last session when M delivered a condescending little list of adjectives that described my Croutongate behavior (two were "ill-mannered" and "petulant") the Sikh looked sad. I think that was a moment when he saw the other side of M and he felt discouraged about our chances.

But I'm still open, just feeling pretty good about observing and thinking and listening to myself until whatever needs to happen happens. Including in me. I can feel myself searching and processing, and that's okay. It'll take the time it takes.

Y'all have gotten me through the most difficult part already, with your incredible listening. THANK YOU.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 05, 2020, 09:27:01 AM
PS M's coming for dinner and I'm looking forward to it. Then again, my shoulders tense up a little. I think it's because his mood can vary and the hyper-factor he'll bring (he's cooking the cod here) if it's on crank, is not fun.

But so far I'm feeling mellow and still enjoying my cleaaaaan house. Pooch will be thrilled to see him.

If I decide to end the relationship (it's still IF), G, I think it's likely (if he is "AN N" as opposed to having strong N-ish traits) that there'd be a lot of emotional blowback from him, so hanging out or shifting to just friends would be difficult.

I still have the goal of remarrying and sharing life with someone. I know love is possible WITH compatibility. So for me, it's now just about seeing if M responds to the change in me with real change/insight himself. I'm not pushing for it any more. It'd have to be voluntary and persistent on his side, and given the intractibility of his nature, I think that's a tall order.

We'll find out. It's going to take time, I just don't know if that's two weeks or two months or two years. I'll know when I know. (I'm 80% there as it is now.)

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 06, 2020, 02:37:51 AM
Response to Lighter from Tupp's thread:

I'm unsure of M's understanding too, but I am leaving that effort or capability up to him. I don't control it. I am looking directly at asking for what I want whether or not he is capable, and releasing the outcome. I don't expect he will get it immediately (or perhaps at all) but it is where I am and where I have finally become clear.

I will not demand he change his personality, because he can't. Saying what I need to say is enough. What happens after is up to him. I'll tell my two things:

1) I will spell out what the constant overtalking does, and the food obsession (they often merge), and how I can't imagine a lifetime relationship with so much chronic stress, because that's how I feel around it. (The food thing is secondary to the talking behavior, and perhaps should be saved for a later session with Sikh.) It doesn't matter whether I should feel a stress response around M, the fact is I do. I notice my shoulders tense when I think about him coming over. I can't change my personality either. We could each modify our tendencies to make the other feel happier, but not uproot our beings.

I have realized lately that I'd gotten quite suppressed in the relationship and felt as though I were losing track of myself. Maybe that's been my own DEpendence, and now I'm trying to rescue myself, not him.

So I'll let him know that clearly, and if he wants to work with his own T or a specialist on the H in ADHD that is likely the primary source of his out of control talking, then that would be a good thing (for him, regardless of whether we stay together). If he were serious about learning about and working on that...that'd be good for me too.

2) I have finally seen the pattern that when he is angry or frustrated, he can become icily cerebral and in a superior tone, goes into a summary of my character with elegant but demeaning descriptions that strike at my self-worth. It's his defense or attack, or both. He's done it just three times but I find it intolerable and have no interest in spending my life with him unless he recognizes it now and stops it now.

Tonight he was feeling depressed and wanted to be cuddled and though I'd been kind and pleasant all evening, I wasn't feeling like cuddling. Frankly, until #2 is resolved (if it even can be), I am not attracted to being physically close. He did a mini-version--something he's said before when I wasn't giving him what he wanted. He said, "You are resistant." I said to what? That implies there's a force or obligation I'm supposed to submit to. I am a free being and make my own choices, and that's an inappropriate thing to say. He backed off and I said I didn't want a distressing conversation about our relationship just before I try to sleep. (Of course, I've been wound up ever since.) He dropped the subject and left, but not before saying I'm going to stay, I don't want to go, making it like a little battle of wills, and I put his stuff together and basically said no, you're not staying. (I'd never sleep with him snoring like a trumpet in the next room, and also felt that he was trying to force me to take care of his emotions in a way that would allow him to avoid them.) He went home calmly, I sent him a sympathetic message about depression and he thanked me for it.

I know he wants to be cuddled and soothed and distracted from his own feelings and I have strong resistance to being in mommy mode. He just thinks I'm being cold but that's not it.

Boy. That little exchange about "You are resistant" holds a LOT. He really does feel empowered to declare who I am with any negative term he wishes. (When he's mad enough to do a whole list, my head starts whooshing and I literally don't recall the list, just the tone.) I am not in a relationship for that, to be seduced or coerced or verbally dominated into doing a man's bidding. I want to be with someone who owns his own shadow side and doesn't project it, and wants to understand his own inner workings.

All together, I think this is a very daunting prospect, that M would do all that deep diving willingly. So I think chances are, after that all sinks in, we'll most likely part.

And I'm okay with whatever happens. I feel clear, and I'm just going to sweep my side of the path.

hugs,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on July 06, 2020, 08:56:12 AM
I'm constantly amazed at how deep you dive into it all, Hops, soooo many people wouldn't.  And you are such a wordsmith.  You state your case so clearly and concisely each time.  I've one thing I'm curious about as you mention M going through your 'negative' attributes at times - does he do the same with your positive ones at times (personally I see your 'negatives' as positives but I get that's not the way they're being projected by him)?

I hope you're able to work your way through everything from your end, Hops.  I don't like to think of you losing yourself in there and becoming suppressed.  No, no, no.  I'm glad you've got that very good therapist to talk things through with (and the gendered stuff would do my head in as well, particularly as I feel so much of it is constructed by society rather than being related to actual biology.  It may well be the T has seen couples behaving in that way but how much of that is learnt?  And how much of that learning contributes to the problems we see around us?  There's a whole other thread there!  Lol ) xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 06, 2020, 11:12:35 AM
Maybe I'm just contrary, but the fastest way for me to lose interest is for a guy to tell me to feel the way he wants me to feel on command.

woof woof... he should just get a dog.

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 06, 2020, 11:51:32 AM
Morning, Tupp--
It sounds so small, one word. But the times he's said it in the past were when he was pressuring me or demanding that I do specific things that he more or less narrated. I need to be attracted, not narrated, if you follow. Or if I wasn't making a commitment promise verbally for marriage or whatever. "You are resistant."

I could cope with disagreement over using a word, if it moved us into conversation in which he was present with me as much as in his own head or agenda. And taking in instead of contradicting what I say. I think that habit goes deep. He says I am doing the same thing (contradicting) when he tells the Sikh, we'd had a wonderful week! And I say, please use the first person because for me, there was a day that was very difficult or painful, etc.

Quote
M going through your 'negative' attributes at times - does he do the same with your positive ones?

He does. It's an odd kind of listing that to me, doesn't feel like affection, but recitation. He's told the Sikh the list several times, and used to repeat it with me a LOT. The positives were kind of, you are: beautiful, intelligent, intricate like a Patek Philippe, literate, sensitive, and that is why I love you and want you in my life. I think he's being sincere and feels that this list explains it all.

Sounds good, right? Or I'm an ingrate? Or I should just purr and hush up because I get the list? The truth is I never enjoyed hearing "the list." It was the same every time and I started feeling like a piece of fine furniture that a salesman would describe the same way. I haven't felt flattered or appreciated with it, no sensation of love or affection coming over me, just mildly uncomfortable. I don't know if it's his delivery or what, and am sure he felt he is being kind to narrate what he judges as my good qualities. I can enjoy a compliment, it's not that...there's just something off about it. (I'm suddenly wondering if that's spectrum stuff. Oh Lord, please don't let me start to diagnose...).

Anyhow, I don't freak out when he's listing positives, of course, who would. BUT, when he lists negatives about me when angry but not admitting he is, there's a difference, I think. Maybe it's a form of passive aggression that I can't tolerate. Or maybe my skin's too thin. Or maybe there really is a pattern of verbal dominance that's exhausting to me. I have a very low tolerance for condescension and being criticized at length. If he would say, there a thing I want to bring up...a particular thing he thinks or observes about me he wants to talk about...then maybe we could and I'd learn something I should about myself. But a whole list of negative characterizations is overwhelming. (Maybe "You are resistant" is one? Because in truth, right now I AM resistant to sliding back into doing what he wants because we haven't resolved that devastating last session, or haven't resolved it enough for me to feel at ease, and I don't know how to cuddle and act as though I'm feeling really romantic when I don't).

Amazingly, we just had a good conversation the phone. I don't think we understand each other, but it's obvious we both care about our relationship. He is currently depressed over the pandemic, not being able to travel or fly (he is accustomed to mannny trips a year), and all the rest. He was also sad because today would be his mother's 100th birthday so he had a sad conversation with his sister and it's just so sad (she's been gone 11 years). What is wrong with me? Dates and timelines just don't move me into melancholy. I'm like a plumber with a calendar. I do notice emotional anniversary reactions but they pass quickly. More likely, it's just a sense of yes, that's when that happened, and I might ponder or feel melancholy for a bit, but then move on. For M, it is tragic, the passing of time. He talks about it a lot, life slipping through his fingers. I get it, we're basically the same age. I just don't like viewing age as tragedy, and maybe a historian has a different take. I get it.

As to understanding each other. I did get out that I am observing that I feel a lot of underlying tension when I'm with him that love doesn't fix. And I'm trying to be present to myself and pay attention. And I hope the Sikh can help us communicate better. And M shared that he feels criticized by me all the time and said "Doubt is destructive." Another theme he mentions a lot is that we'll die soon. So he'd really like us (me) to just hurry up and seize the day and go for it, with our relationship. I understand that point of view but don't share it, because an unhappy life together would be worse than being alone. I do think he's right that I think a lot about everything emotional. He says too much.

Hoo boy. "Doubt is destructive." I could say, "Doubt is protective." The truth is probably in between. He says (thinking it's a huge long time) "We've known each other a year and a half". I say (thinking it's not enough time to really know if our marriage would be wise or happy, given our struggles) "We've known each other a year and a half." I do understand how he's feeling. I don't perceive that he has much of a grasp of how I'm feeling. I think as long as I respond to his forcefield, it's great. But when I doubt, question, balk or dig into stuff, he thinks I'm being bad.

Then again, I felt better after we talked. It was friendly. Nothing really resolved but more honesty on the table. He acknowledged that he's concerned about us too, which is good. I dunno.

I'm going to email the Sikh (nothing detailed, just a sentence) to ask if it's ever possible to do a back to back two-hour session, or to have two in a week, and would he recommend that.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on July 06, 2020, 12:14:02 PM
Aw, Hops.  You do sound as if you are both on different pages but wanting to be on the same page.  Maybe it's possible.  I tend to hear 'You are resistant' as one of those things women get told when they assert themselves; 'you're difficult, you're aggressive, you don't care about me'.  Likely he doesn't mean it that way (maybe he does) but I think we all have our 'things', don't we, that bother us or grate on us for whatever reason.  I do like that he notices positives as well (I just wondered if he only does the negative listing) but, yes, I get that it's not necessarily a good or a useful thing.  I tend to think actions speak louder than words.  I think I mentioned on here before that I prefer someone making me a cup of tea to someone buying me a bunch of flowers.  One feels (to me) that someone cares about me, the other feels that someone wants to show other people that they care.  Most likely not intentioned in that way but I think that's what's important, isn't it - being able to speak your truth and have it accepted and being able to hear someone else's truth and accept theirs as well.  It's so complicated.

Definitely no to the purring and hushing up.  I can't imagine our Hops purring and keeping quiet!  Who would that strange creature be?  Lol.  Not thin skinned, to my mind.  There is a difference between, "this is bothering me, can we have a talk about it later?" and someone listing what they see as your faults.  It would bother me as well.  And yes, I get the not being moved by dates thing.  I'm always aware of dates - my mum's birthday is etched on my brain, as is my dad's and the anniversary of his death.  I'm quite into my own little rituals around my dad's death.  If I'm in the right part of the country I go to the place that his ashes are scattered and just sit there.  I do feel close to him there, not least because I know he lived round there when he was young and I can imagine him running around and playing.  My sister never gives it a second thought.  We're all different, aren't we?  And yep, I can understand the 'life is slipping away' thing but I'm like you, alone rather than together and unhappy.  My guess is you are much more ready to accept the possibility of being alone than M is?  I do hope you can find some sort of middle ground somewhere.  Whatever happens, no-one can say you've not put the time and effort in to this!  You deserve happiness, so, so much xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 06, 2020, 12:53:34 PM
I also brought up my thinking that there are layers of compatibility, and I think we're (I'm) just discovering more about ways we are maybe NOT compatible, and that learning to really communicate well is the only way I see that we could offset those differences. Or something like that. Lord knows, I might be pissing into the wind.

But I promised myself to give it a little more time, so I am.

Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 06, 2020, 01:35:50 PM
Thank you, (((((((((Tupp))))))))).

I feel very understood and regarded so kindly.

That makes a huge difference. So now I'll let it go for
a bit, haul nose back out of navel, and enjoy a
lovely day on my own!

Sun's blazing outside but Pooch and I are cool
and calm, house is still clean (imagine!) and I am
back to my favorite emotion.

GRATEFULLY,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on July 06, 2020, 03:45:26 PM
Maybe the stalkers will learn something.

No sense worrying about what they think,IME.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 06, 2020, 04:48:29 PM
Ahhh, CB, I'm so grateful for your reply. Thank you.

Quote
M's recitation of your positive traits. My ex did that.... The list never varied, they always came in a list together, and were usually recited to someone else ABOUT me.

This is often true, although periodically during the earlier part of our relationship he'd recite it to me often, and still dusts it off now and then. I feel as though the purpose is like "reminding himself of the relationship rationale" or something.

 (My M...would exclaim delightedly about something when I was doing it

That sounds like the difference between present-ness and professor-ness. Sigh

....we had a whole canon of Scripture that he could use as ammunition, and did. He didn't use "resistant", but rather "unsubmissive".

To me "resistant" is a LOT like "unsubmissive", which is why I dislike it. A lot.

Are you clear about what he's thinking when he says that you dont have many years left? Is he worried about one of you becoming ill or incapacitated and having to be a caretaker for those end of life years? Do you have any sense that he would be a tender caretaker to you, if it came to that? I know that you would be to him, if you made that commitment. You were incredibly patient with your mom--I remember--and I don't think he should worry on that account. Have you ever reassured him of that?

I think he feels panic over aging and losing his power and prestige, both of which are huge motivations. I don't think he's specifically worried about illness. Likewise caretakers. With his millions he could hire any help he needed. And, I think if he were unpartnered and really debilitated he'd move to California where his sons and their families would be very dutiful and attentive. Of course, if we were married I'd be very compassionate and dedicated to his well being sickness or health. I do not have the same sense he'd be a tender caretaker to me, it's not what he's good at (empathy or presentness). He'd be very responsible about hiring whatever help I needed. It would just be protection from neglect, and living somewhere pleasant. That's not nothing.

I used to ask my ex if he thought that whining was part of foreplay.

My M is a world-class whiner. He literally whines--it's a high babyish sound--moans like a hurt puppy, heaves huge sighs, and when that doesn't produce pats and cuddles, says something critical. "You're resistant" was just last night in that same situation. Huge turn-off. I am viscerally uninterested in mommying a grown man. I CAN love a grown man like an equal, loving and very affectionate partner. But I've been there and done that with one-way noticing and presentness. (When I did it for work, I was kind, patient to all and absorbed a bit of nastiness from the old gent, daily. He was impatient and ungrateful but we understood our relationship. In a love relationship, I'm not eager to sign up for that behavior. I'm very tender and forgiving when someone's in pain or afraid. But his whiiiiining, ugh.

CB, I really needed this. Your stories about our overlaps are soooooooooo helpful. I do think I can read the writing on the wall. Just going at it one line at a time. Thank  you so very much.

Gratefully,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 12, 2020, 11:29:28 AM
I'm 90% decided that I need to end the relationship in our T session with the Sikh tomorrow.

It's still very hard. There will be pain and loss and fear of future. But I have been absorbing a ton of reviewing what Nism is, how drawn to it and comfortable I feel with it at FIRST. (And started re-reading our early, romantic correspondence which, on reflection, was absorbing at first -- we both dazzled with literacy and verbal pyrotechnics -- but actually draining and false-feeling later.) I don't doubt at all that M was sincere, but it was all so grandiose and high-flown.

What's really brought me to the breaking point is the ongoing stress of being with someone who, however well intentioned, simply CANNOT listen and simply MUST talk nonstop and simply CANNOT not-instruct/force-teach. Because it really is the only language or behavior he can do.

Therefore, I would have to simply "put down", as CB says, any hope of being known at a deeper level, or feeling a harmonious intimacy. M THOUGHT we were intimate soulmates from an early point, but that was mostly his flights of hyperbole. I responded in kind at first, but as our year went on, I realize I was feeling less and less romantically interested, and morphing into companionship, which has been comforting at times, but inevitably led to considering how we actually ARE as partners.

How I am is suppressed, frustrated and stressed. He just doesn't feel stuff or feel it in a way that changes him. And so be it, he's not going to have a personality transplant at this age, and neither am I. I've come to the sad realization that living with or marrying him would tax me to the core. Not because he's BAD, just because he is the way he is.

We had a stupid power struggle over who was going to program my new streaming system (had to buy an upgrade so we could watch Hamilton). He immediately wanted to take over "I'll do it" not "Would you like me to do it?". I said very clearly and more than once, I appreciate that you could do it, but I want to work through it myself because that builds competence. He kept barking instructions at me, and I repeated and repeated and repeated -- Could you just sit quietly and pat Pooch? I'm working with two remotes and two pairs of glasses (one for reading instructions off TV screen, one for the booklet, etc) so concentration's really difficult. Please, please, stop instructing me, stope telling me what to do, I can see the instructions and I will work through it, maybe just more slowly than you would.

NOTHING worked. He could not/would not stop barking orders, reading things off the screen loudly that added to my stress in concentrating. I must have begged him 10 times to stop talking at me and be quiet so I could think, and he literally could not do it. At one point I said what's so hard is that you can't control yourself. (Meaning his talking.) I persisted and got it all done but the experience was soooooooo stressful that I was drained and literally sweating. At the dinner table, I just said, that was extremely stressful. He just looked blank.

So I picture trying to share ordinary things in a shared home. I just can't. It doesn't matter what the event or task is...he Must Be In Charge. There's no harmonious teamwork. To this day it's a struggle to negotiate something as simple as whether I can carry dishes to the counter. Everything's a struggle for control.

I don't think M intends or wants to be this way but whether it's his OCDish or Nish or ADHDish issues....they add up to me feeling that I would be fighting to just be present, to take up space, to have enough oxygen. And I am Nish too at times, and super super sensitive, and introverted in a way, and just too easily drained by a personality as powerful as his.

That's just it. As much as I dread loneliness returning, and anxiety returning, and a quarantined winter alone coming up...I dread the petty power struggles and sometime putdowns (when he's mad, which he never owns, and gives a freezing cold condescending narrative of what's wrong with my character) more.

I think marrying or living with him would damage my health. And I guess that's the bottom line.

Another thing--I asked M if on occasion when it might really help, would he consider a 2-hour session or two sessions in one week? Because I think now is a time it might help us. He said that would be excessive and too much and...No. I asked because I am at that cracking point and he senses it, I think, and does not want to go deeper, to be in touch or work with with his feelings (much less mine) and resents the probing that highlights his own issues, and so forth. What I thought about later was just--he can concentrate passionately 8 hours a day on his scholarship. But me asking for an additional hour of T in one week, only in crisis, was "too much." During the call later, M said: Too much thinking! Too much talking! You have to Seize the Day! We'll be dead soon! etc....

At the end of our last session the Sikh asked, Hops, is one of your biggest concerns that your boundaries are not respected? I said Yes from my depths. And yet a week later M simply cannot or won't respect a basic request that he stop talking at me during the electronics setup I was doing. It felt HORRIBLE, but was also such a clear sign that no amount of discussion in T or suggestions from the T can penetrate the rigidity of his dominating behavior. It truly probably is out of his control, and if that's so I feel badly for him. But I think it contributed to my stroke in the past and could contribute to worse (because I am made the way I am) in stress-related health consequences over time.

During that last session I laid it all out, and I actually had chest pain while talking and my hands shook throughout. In hindsight, I think if talking openly about emotions and problems produces such fear, then I've got issues of my own to work on with my own T. But it also says something about how fearful I am of letting down my guard, or boundaries, with M. Because I do not feel fully emotionally safe, despite all his declarations about love and life (which go on for pages). He wants to INSTRUCT me into the relationship of his own fantasies (travel! food! diversion! distraction!) but he really cannot understand my own (peace, harmony, cooperation).

So, tomorrow, I need to tell M and the Sikh that I've realized that as we've spent more time, that I cannot continue the dream/expectation of a lifetime commitment.

It's really hard and I'm scared, but I think it's the right decision. I so hope so.

(Possibly, I could offer to remain his friend and occasional dinner companion. But I think it's unlikely, because it's so common among people with highly N traits to become quite unpleasant after you say No to them or stop cooperating with their plans. I would anticipate a lot of passive aggression and jabs of hostility. And I would love to be wrong.)

Despite all I'm saying here about M's dark or difficult sides, I will also miss him, genuinely. He has at times been delightful, playful, sparkling and fun. And generous (trips! food and wine!). I will miss those times. But I think I've gotten a clear vision of what a DAILY future or a DOMESTIC partnership would be like with him, and it's not happy. It'd be filled with his ego and compulsion to control, plus his reluctance or inability to do work that requires a deep encounter with himself. Too scary or too irrelevant for him.

He really is extremely fulfilled by his scholarship, and though it'll be very hard on him, I think returning to his teaching (online) this fall is exactly how he'll survive. He is driven, deeply, by his profession. And he has adoring family on two continents. He can talk to his older sister (his "guardian angel") for hours. So he'll have a lot of long-distance understanding and support. I have my friends.

Believe it or not, I still love the man. And I'm facing deep risk of my own in deciding to end of it. At my age, with some health fears and loneliness looming, some might think I'm mad to end it. But I believe that personal integrity demands that I be honest and open and tell it like it is.

It won't go down well. I'm scared but will survive it.

I'm wondering whether it's wrong of me to do this during a T session.

I could ask M if I might come by this afternoon? I could tell him then and then leave it up to him whether he still wants to Zoom with the T tomorrow. (I would do that regardless.)

Advice welcome on the in-person versus doing it with the Sikh? In-person might be better behavior. With-T is the only way I know I'll be able to speak my piece without interruption. But alone in-person might be more honorable.

Please do let me know your thoughts on the last paragraph...or anything.

thanks all,
Hops

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on July 12, 2020, 11:58:42 AM
Oh, Hops, I am so sorry.  You have worked so hard at this and I'm truly sorry that M isn't able to do more of the dazzling, fun, interesting stuff and really dial down the OTT bits.  We all have our quirks and faults, as you say, but yes, they need to be a part of the package that doesn't overwhelm or engulf the other person.  My heart was in my mouth when I read your description of setting up the TV box and having your repeated requests for him to let you get on with it ignored.  I am of the school of 'do it yourself so you learn more' (although I will get someone else to do it if I'm completely outwitted) but to have someone insist on being involved when you've asked so many times for them to leave you to it just isn't on.  And yes, if it becomes a daily battle over meals, household chores, your poetry, and the various other things you've had these issues with, exhaustion will just become part of daily life and we don't want that for our Hopsie.

When I initially read your options for telling him (in person versus with the T) my initial thought was that in person would be kinder.  Then when I read you don't think you'll be able to say your piece without him interrupting if it's just the two of you my heart sank.  For you to be in a situation where you need a third party present in order to keep him quiet long enough for you to say all you need to is just not on.  So I think go with the T session.  I'm sure, you being you, you'll have lots of nice things to say about him as well so he will hear good things along with the parts he doesn't want to hear.  At least it means you'll be able to say all of that as well.  He might not get to hear the nice bits if it's just the two of you because he might not stop talking long enough to listen.  So I would go for the T option. 

And perfectly normal that you love him even though some of the stuff he does drives you nuts!  I don't think we get to choose who we fall in love with.  It happens; sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.  I am truly sorry that it's got to this stage though.  I had been keeping everything cross for some kind of breakthrough for the two of you xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 12, 2020, 01:01:36 PM
Well, I think you've you thought this through with lots of compassion for M and balanced that with your own self-comfort and needs Hops.

I completely understand being scared, too. Fighting my own self-battle on that same thing right now. If you need the Sikh, to say what you have to to say and be HEARD ('coz I can imagine there might be some total denial of the content & reality, on M's part when you speak the words) then by all means choose that method. It's NOT less honorable to admit you have your own limitations openly speaking your truth and needing a safe place to do so. That's a sneaky way of putting yourself down; worthy of my own tricks even!  ;)  And it gives away your power to M, in a way.

If we (sorry for the we) can't politely decline an open invitation to participate in a relationship without fear of how it'll be received - or what it says about US... then we're already at a disadvantage; it's putting someone else's desires and needs above our own. Saying that they matter more than ourselves. And I'm afraid I've misunderstood for some time, how that isn't "compassion" so much as a fuzzy boundary; perhaps sometimes even codependence or enabling.

It is known, that N's or the unconsciously Nish will train their source to do exactly that. And neural pathways are damned persistent; even familiar and therefore understood as "comfort zone". Breaking that understanding is one of my new goals for myself.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 13, 2020, 02:34:00 PM
Thank you all, so very much.
I don't think I would have been able to have my come-to-reality decision without your wisdom, patience and support. I am so grateful.

I'll answer you each in turn but have 30 minutes until the appointment and am trying to figure out what to say. I'll start with gratitude, because I am grateful we gave it a try, and then explain I've reached a place of knowing it couldn't be a truly shared life, so I'm letting go of that.

If he wants a friendship, that might work. Or not. But I've got to say my piece.

If you see this, please send strength and serenity my way at 3pm EST!

Will update you later.

Gratefully,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on July 13, 2020, 03:35:23 PM
Aw, Hops, sending you all the strength and serenity I can muster!  You have been, and are being, true to yourself and we all need that.  You will find the right words; you always do, and the nice Sikh therapist seems to be a helpful and calming influence.  And whatever else happens, you've both learnt more about yourselves along the way and you are right that you've had some very nice times as well.  I'm hoping it goes as well as these sort of things can.  We are all rooting for you xx xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: CB123 on July 13, 2020, 04:22:18 PM
Thinking of you Hops.

CB
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 13, 2020, 04:47:25 PM
Thank you both.

It went okay. I started with all the ways I love and appreciate him and then said I didn't think a shared life could work. I had a few examples.

He argued with every example and the T said, what you're doing now, M, isn't serving you. (M also began criticizing me, about how "every time I turn around there's another boundary") and we offered competing versions of Rokugate.) It was absurd in moments but a couple key moments for me were:

After I said my piece, M said "I will continue to see you, because you are [positive attributes...]."
Didn't say, "I'd like to..." or "Do you think we could..." or "What I want would be...."

Just said, "I WILL continue to see you." I noticed it. Sikh noticed it.

M offered a lot of critical stuff about me and I know that was hurt speaking. I didn't take the bait. I'm glad/relieved about that. I did describe how frustrated and stressed I feel when my speaking something (clear, honest) repeatedly about what I need or want is sometimes as though I simply never spoke. Wasn't heard.

I even said that at times with him, I feel "voiceless." Sikh wanted to know if when M was doing something like he did with the Roku event, I could just say "Get out of here, I can't think" and I confessed...it's not how I'm wired. If someone doesn't/won't hear me when I say/ask for something in plain English repeatedly, I'm not just going to be blunter and louder. He understood.

I described him as a wonderful, amazing, remarkable, fascinating person and expressed a whole lot of gratitude for the experiences I've had with him.

The Sikh said that although he sees that we both genuinely have love for the other, he wasn't surprised. He has seen the challenges/patterns we have. I sensed that he was truly disappointed for us. What a good man.

I wound up explaining what an enormously powerful personality M has (a positive spin but also true) and that the way I am made, I just don't think I can take on the assignment of redirecting all that power without health cost to myself. But I tried to express it in such a way that it was also a respectful compliment. M IS an amazing steam engine of a person. He reminds me of a driven CEO of some huge corporation, but in his case, it's academic pinnacles.

We left it that I remain open to possible friendship, and M emailed that it was "too bad" and to let him know if I ever have a "change of heart." I replied that my heart would never change toward him and that I was very sorry, and that if in time simple friendship would feel right for us both, why not?

It was hard but not as hard as I'd feared. Time will tell. I think the grief and future-fears and difficulty of winter alone will wear in ... but I hadda do what I hadda do.

I am very glad we had our relationship and hope for another. Even if that's not to be, I'll still be glad I was with M for the time I was. The Sikh focused a lot on keep our loving feelings for each other, and said he understood that we wanted that to remain.

I really thought the Sikh understood.

hugs and so much gratitude (I could never have understood myself or my needs this clearly without you guys--ever)--

Hops

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Dr. Richard Grossman on July 13, 2020, 07:37:11 PM
Thanks for sharing all of this with us, Hops.  You have set a wonderful example of facing and dealing with this very common and serious relationship issue.  I hope many people read this thread and learn how to free themselves and not be "voiceless."

Richard
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: CB123 on July 13, 2020, 09:15:12 PM
That was really hard, Hops. I know it took a lot of courage to put everything on the table and risk the critical response that you got. I am so glad you did it with Sikh there. That was a good plan. With that much stress today, I'll bet you feel like you are turned inside out tonight.

I'm glad you already have your patio get togethers organized. I'm looking forward to hearing that you were able to have a conversation again without being interrupted!

I wonder if you can continue to have cleaning help occasionally? I noticed that you were very soothed by that little bit of self care. It seems like you are already carving out time to write and read and think. I hope this makes it easier and less stressful to really gift yourself with that kind of attention.

Tomorrow will be another day....I hope you get a good rest tonight.

Much love,
CB



Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 14, 2020, 01:30:14 AM
Thank you, from the heart, ((((Doc G)))).
I think the reason the last weird struggle (over a Roku box!) was the last straw for me was that my feeling of not being heard was overwhelming. I not only felt as though I were voiceless, but as though I wasn't even in the room. Yet I was, and making sounds, speaking words...and nothing I said changed his behavior in the slightest. Not at iota. It was a disturbing feeling and a clarifying one.

((((CB)))), it was such a comfort to read "that was really hard." Your empathy of that just came right through and means more than I can say. Thank you.

And you're right, I'm utterly exhausted. (M. called and said, so why don't you come for dinner Wednesday. As though...all is well, we'll just get back into our routine now. I told him I needed time to think but once the fog blew through, I know that's not what I need. I think it would be confusing and distressing to go right back to his house--same schedule that he follows, always Wednesday---with Pooch and go through the same ritual as though everything's fine. For me, a big dream has ended, and M spoke as though he was just fine, no big deal. I don't believe it, but fear a new pressure campaign if I slide back into his rituals/world too easily. I finally just said I don't know what I need yet, I'm grieving.)

I think I'll just email him that I'm going to need several months to settle down and adjust to the change before I'll know whether it's wise to repeat our dinner dates.
(Honestly, if I become well and strong I think it would be wiser not to. He really is N-ish. The Sikh told him, "For someone who respects women, you are dismissive to her...." I thought M kind of dismissed that the way he dismisses me, and then M asked the Sikh for the second time if he would come to dinner, "now that our professional relationship is over." The Sikh smiled and made some remark about being vegetarian. Maybe that was a nice "No" -- I hope it was.

Thank you both, and all--
Gratefully,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on July 14, 2020, 05:50:49 AM
I think you should be very proud of yourself, Hops.  You've embraced every aspect of this, enjoyed the good bits, been incredibly honest with both yourself and M, worked very, very hard, been willing to consider other perspectives and you've been very open and understanding where M is concerned.  I don't think anyone could have done more, or done it all so gracefully.  You're willing to step away, despite your very understandable fears about your retirement years.  I honestly don't think I know anyone else as honest or as willing to go it alone rather than settling and making do.  I am awed by you.

I do think it might be best to have a complete break from M for a while before deciding whether you want to see him as a friend.  I thought him inviting you over to dinner and saying he was still willing to see you did sound a bit like he hadn't heard you again.  And maybe you just need a bit of time to get back to being you again.  I hope you can be very kind to yourself and look after yourself well.  I feel a bit sad you won't be seeing the nice therapist again!  He seemed like a really good egg :)  I don't think he'll be going to M's for dinner :)

I am sorry that things haven't worked out, especially as you've worked so hard and there were good bits.  But things are what they are, aren't they?  I'm glad you've not sacrificed yourself and allowed him to consume you.  We wouldn't want our Hopsie to turn into a delicate wallflower :)  Lots of love to you xx xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 14, 2020, 08:08:42 AM
Uh-oh... just seeing all this Hops.

Good job! I'm really proud of you, for doing this as gently and gracefully as possible. Kindly even; but FIRMLY.

You are going to need some cocoon time now, recovery, realizing that though we truly wish it was the kind of world that we didn't have to go such extremes to stand up for and protect ourselves; to even be heard, recognized as a real person with our own feelings, and those feelings and boundaries acknowledged as important as the other person's... sometimes we have to and we CAN. Trust that self-knowledge. Many times, it doesn't take this much firmness.

I have a lingering worry though, over his dinner invitation - as if none of what you expressed about your feelings mattered or changed things between you. IIRC, one of your first observations and concerns that you shared was M's entitlement attitude. Saying he WILL see you... despite your ending the relationship... means he isn't recognizing your decision - nor your right or perogative to make that decision. Perhaps it'll sink in over the next weeks, but that's going to require you to constantly turn down his offers... and that means, you're not "done" yet. IMO, you need to be done to mourn the ending and could've beens... and find your self again, strong and optimistic and capable. You need the space; he perceives his need for YOU in his life outweighs your need for space. (Sorry, I AM a worrywort. I sincerely hope I'm just imagining the worst and this doesn't happen.)

Sometimes, it's simply not possible to remain friends after an attempt at deeper relationship. It's just not an ideal world, and some people aren't capable of that at the time - and may never be. If that person has trouble recognizing that other people are free to have their boundaries... even being friends is challenging. So instead of hoping to remain friends, for now - my advice is to hold onto your warm affectionate thoughts toward him, wish him well, and close that little energy Hallmark emotion-bubble with - "It was just never going to work out."

That's a whole lot of complexity and levels to navigate a path through, Hops. It's real WORK. And it's emotionally draining. We need to have a cyber "Amazon's bonfire" - a girl's night out - to commemorate what a task this has been and how successfully you accomplished it.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: CB123 on July 14, 2020, 09:16:57 AM
Hops,
Him calling and saying "why don't you come for dinner on Wednesday" sent a chill through me. He actually couldnt have said anything that would have pointed up the problem more clearly. Wow.

I think your plan of taking a few months to settle yourself before entertaining that idea is a good one. And maybe, if you do, a neutral spot like going out and getting a burger where there is no power imbalance. You can even pick up the check.

I'm glad you're safe.

Love
CB
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 14, 2020, 10:56:59 AM
Thank you ((((Tupp)))), especially for this deep image:
 
Quote
you've not sacrificed yourself and allowed him to consume you

On a feeling level, you couldn't be more perceptive.
I love the man but he is so powerful he feels "consuming". Maybe even "voracious."

And I do need several months of full separation/silence before I could risk a possible new connection. It may not be necessary, as if his N-ish side wins out in his hurt, he may do the full discard himself. One never knows, and yesterday he expressed a lot of resentment about my short "retreats" during our relationship, so I can't imagine how months of it will feel to him. Time will tell.

((((AMber)))). I swear, I think we all here have PhDs in insight:

Quote
...wish it was the kind of world that we didn't have to go such extremes to stand up for and protect ourselves; to even be heard, recognized as a real person with our own feelings, and those feelings and boundaries acknowledged as important as the other person's...sometimes we have to and we CAN.

That was bracing in all the best ways. Thank you.

I also think you're exactly right about the dinner invites (I had written him "in time, if it feels positive for us both") which he interpreted as "....[your email did not enter my awareness] ...So come on back now, in two days"). I plan to turn down whatever pokes come in. Lovingly but firmly. And if they become a flood, maybe not so lovingly.

I know from "the literature" about Nism that No-Contact is often the only way to fully move on. And that it's usually advised. I think that's more important with malignant N-ism (which M does not have) but I'm wary of going porous, so I'll be vigilant about when and how, and make sure if I do accept an invite one day (should they still be coming), I do it out of choice and not feeing obligated. Winter loneliness will definitely challenge my resolve, but maybe by then it'll be okay.

I sent him some info on Adult ADHD. Turns out that compulsive talking and inability to listen are massively common symptoms in those with the hyperactive type, which I believe M has. He's never explored it, so I said I hoped if he chose to, it would be a revelation and a help. Ironic that in the decade after being diagnosed myself (inattentive type, or likely the combined type), I wound up with a boyfriend who seems to have the same problem, different aspect. Two cats in a bag?

(((((CB))))) I understand the chill. It's an example of the "did I not just say something in plain English?" gaslit feeling I had during Rokugate. I'm thinking it's likely his whizzing brain rather than anything malevolent like stalking. I don't feel unsafe, truly. I think his own inner rules of conduct would not permit that kind of thing. (If he did behave in any antisocial way toward me, he'd find himself quickly facing the Great Wall of China.)

A neutral space like a park with a picnic is a much better idea than going to his house, and I will keep that in mind.

Right now, awash in gratitude for all this understanding, I need to do the cocooning and self care and simplicity.

Today: Watering the garden and taxes. (Talk about epic ADD procrastination...I have to sort whopping piles of papers today to even find the tax stuff, and that's before I go online and pick some freefile program to get it in by tomorrow!)

HEARTFELTLY,

Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 14, 2020, 11:49:14 AM
PS I sent M a last email for now, quoting my own that had said "in time, if we both want to, we could ...." and said that to clarify, I thought he had missed "in time" and for me it wasn't two days.

I spelled out that what I need is complete silence (including my own) for several months, to calm myself/resettle/process/cope--and that if in early October we both still want to then, I'd be glad to hear from him and we could do a nice picnic.

I wished him much love and support from his family and friends, and his T or even the Sikh (dropping a seed, since I have the feeling he'd do well with him, and maybe better than with his current young counselor provided by the University), and said as painful as the decision was, I have faith that we'll both be okay in the long run.

So now I've been as clear as I know how to be.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 14, 2020, 12:30:36 PM
(It did break my heart when M said on the phone, "You're my best friend" because I know it's true. I know he's going to go through some terrible pain.)

Okay.
Bye for now.

H.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on July 15, 2020, 03:39:02 AM
Perhaps losing his best friend will be the spur that he needs to seek further help, Hopsie, to rein in those bits that have caused the problems.  Particularly if it is an ADHD related thing.  It might be that some specific counseling or perhaps even medication may help.  It's not something I know much about but he could use this as his own 'late diagnosis' moment and it might help him in the long run.  I think you've actually done him a great service, even though I don't expect he sees it that way.  But you've really shone a light into some dark areas and shown him that it is possible to ask for help, work though problems, speak openly and clearly about feelings and so on.  I've learnt that from you, just from reading this thread, so those lessons are there should he want to take it further.  And he does have support, as you say - family, friends, work colleagues and so on.  And I dare say you'd be open to email conversation if he wanted your take on something that came up in therapy or your opinion on something that had happened (possibly quite a long way off for him but if he did get to the stage where he was learning to listen I can't see you refusing to communicate in a supportive way).  So I think he'll be okay. 

I do know what you mean about winter coming.  I think thoughts of winter is what's turned my mind to moving (I'll go into it more on the other thread).  I did wonder if any of your other friends have been very careful with regard to precautions and might be up for a dinner date once a week?  Or if the patio heater idea might mean socially distanced outdoor buffets could go on after the weather turns colder?  Just wondered if it might ease you through the winter solitude.

I hope you got the tax thingy done.  Sounded grim!  Lol xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 15, 2020, 05:27:03 AM
Tupp, we're dreamers, I think. Earnest proposals for things to become better (and how that might be achieved) or people's loads to be lightened (ditto). Deaf ears.

M's response to my ADHD info was... "Too late! Why take on a futile project when there's so much new to see and do!" I know that means he can't/won't undertake new therapy or study about himself. I get it, he feels old, fatalistic. His escape pattern has been on airplanes, running everywhere he can as often as he can. I think that's been his unconscious search for a stimulant. Seriously. Then he said I could still go to Dublin with him in spring if travel is safe. Felt like a bribe.

His next reply (to my last in which I expressed heartfelt concern for him and hope that he'd find love and support for this transition in friends, family, and T): seemed subtly hostile. Natural when you're feeling the sting of rejection, I guess, but this was unpleasant to read:
"...don't sound so serious. You've chosen what I think you have always wanted and sought: total independence. That always comes with a price."

He used to specifically admire my independence. And he knew also that I'd had a lot of fear for my future. So it seems to me...this was subtle ill will. (You'll regret not being with me, kind of thing.) Perhaps we're already in N-scorned territory.

Strike anybody else that way? I haven't answered either -- think I'll just let it lie.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on July 15, 2020, 07:54:45 AM

"...don't sound so serious. You've chosen what I think you have always wanted and sought: total independence. That always comes with a price."

H

Ooh, Hops.  That sent a chill down my spine.  Very perceptive of you to spot it. No acceptance of the behaviour that's led to this, your kindness and genuine concern that he's okay and supported now, an implication that you didn't want to be in a relationship?  And the notion that being alone is somehow less preferable than being with someone and being unhappy?  Independence comes with a price?  The price being what, your own autonomy?  Not having to hide who you are because someone else doesn't want to see it?  You must pay a price now for not just accepting the things that were making you unhappy (even affecting your physical health)?  And the further implication that you can't be independent within a relationship?  There's a difference between being independent and being single - for some reason I don't think some men can separate the two when it comes to women.  Hmmm.  Okay.  I was having/have had some sympathy for M but he has gone back on my arse kicking list now.

I would let it lie, Hops.  You've been very kind and gracious and gone out of your way to try to make this easier for him - not that you needed to, that's your kind heart shining through.  Leave him to it now.  Polite refusal to any requests that come by but I wouldn't engage any further.  Circle your wagons, take extra good care of yourself and when the time comes that you do feel up to seeking male company again we'll see if Buck's got any single friends.  I have been day dreaming of you, Skep and your two Bucks double dating :)  Lol xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on July 15, 2020, 08:08:48 AM
We're getting ready to check out of our lodging, but wanted to add support, Hops.

I don't think M' hostility was benign.  I think you're spot on.  I think he's ADHD running through everything over and over in his head.  Soon he'll be talking about it with everyone who can't run or roll away.

As for his " therapist" being young and from the University...I think it's more holding forth.  I don't believe for a second he opened up, was vulnerable, ever admitted his struggle, even to himself.  I don't think he could have.  Not where all his strength and competency come from.  That's too bad. 

You don't need M sniping at all your sore spots, Hops.  I do believe it will go on, as reality sets in for him, getting meaner.  I believe  you are his best friend too.  You were an excellent friend and mate pick for him.

He doesn't happen to be a good fit for you.   

:: Sending calm happy gardening vibes::.

((Hops))  Though M seems immune, you found the clarity you were Sikhing. 

Lighter



Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on July 15, 2020, 11:00:31 AM


((Hops))  Though M seems immune, you found the clarity you were Sikhing. 

Lighter

Lighter, that is pure genius.  Lol xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 15, 2020, 02:20:43 PM
Quote
   And the further implication that you can't be independent within a relationship?  There's a difference between being independent and being single - for some reason I don't think some men can separate the two when it comes to women.

Spot on, Tupp. I've experienced this firsthand. It's always subtle, but it's there. Where I really kick myself, is where I did it to myself - believing it was expected of me - until it was just taken for granted that this is who I was. (I wasn't; but didn't know thing one at the time, about who I was.)

Hops - is it possible that verbal engagement - any engagement with M at this point at all, beyond politely refusing invitations... is just exactly what he wants; what is feeding his sense of being entitled to further demeaning you, putting you down, and his sense of rejection?? (Oh woe is me, I did nothing wrong...)

As you continue to explain, even when wishing him well while reinforcing your refusal to participate in relationship... he's seeing it as a bargaining chip... a way through your defenses... a "gotcha" he can leverage to prop up his ego against the feelings of rejection.

This is why I said sometimes it's not possible to remain friends. What he's doing isn't "processing" and it's not fair. Reduce or end the exposure so YOU can go through the next phases.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: CB123 on July 15, 2020, 03:35:45 PM
A smart lover would use this opportunity to backtrack and try to make a better impression.

I'm sorry to say that it is classic N behavior to lash out and try to make you and your requests look ridiculous, even after the fact. I dont think he is going to try to hang onto the relationship. The next task will likely be to save his sense of himself, thus the ridicule, and that could go on for a bit.

Sorry Hops. That sucks.

CB
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 15, 2020, 04:53:12 PM
No kidding, Tupp! Lighter, that's the MOST satisfying pun I've read in ages. So great I may send it to the Sikh! I agree with you that it wasn't a benign message. M disowns anger, ever, so unfortunately he won't admit to the punitive quality of those remarks either. But that's on him, I'm letting it go (caveat at end).

Tupp, your list of indignant questions was very affirming. Thank you very much for letting those rip! Yup. Even if a man can't/won't bother with tuning into empathy for how women can feel, that was a beautiful display of clear and righteous indignation. I'm grateful it was on my behalf, I needed to hear it.

Your advice too is well taken (although see caveat at end...oof).

Amber, I don't know. I think I've expressed soooo much frustration about disregarded boundaries that M isn't likely to go on a campaign to overtly ignore them now. I think in fact he probably believes he's lost me for good (which he has, barring miraculous insight plus self-confrontation on his part that I'm not expecting). The inner-boy part of him is in pain and full of woe. The Nish side produced an oh-so-omniscient lashing out at my chance for future happiness. The "price." Subtle, but he can't get by my writing-radar. (And he can't demean me to anybody but the medieval historians who've met me, or his family, but if we're well and truly OVER, it's moot. I will not accept direct demeaning anyway.)

CB, I hope your predictions of him introducing classic rejected-N sequences now are wrong, but I've asked him to not contact me until early October, when we each can decide whether to do a friend-picnic. I have zero f***s left to give to defending new bulldozed boundaries, so if he chose to take the dozer out for a spin over one, even a friendship possibility would be closed off then, for me.

The caveat: I read the first few responses here that WISELY said "set it down now" or "nope nope we're done" or the equivalent, and I still caved to my own compulsion to let him know exactly how I read that message, and it turned into a long "explanation" of how I felt two things: Dismissed when he'd repeatedly disregard boundaries he'd agreed to respect, and in specific about that message, Hurt.

Then I closed asking him not to contact me until October, and I intend to discipline myself likewise (wanting to avoid the email tunnel). I think he'll respect it. No idea how he'll be weeks from now.

Meanwhile I need to internalize all-a y'all's advice, because it's golden.

Sometimes here I feel as though this Board has, for years, filled a longing I always had for a sister. Thank you so much, I feel I have quite a few!

hugs
Hops

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: CB123 on July 15, 2020, 07:10:39 PM
A nice thought, Hops, to have a sister!

We don't often think of it, because we are so used to giving away our power--but you could also tell him that YOU will contact HIM when you are ready, and that it will likely be October before you are. No need to ask him to respect your timetable when you already know he won't. 

Anyway, its weird going through that--you are closing doors that neither of you is completely comfortable closing. So its awkward.

Love,
CB
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 15, 2020, 10:12:11 PM
Awkward as hell.
I spewed a couple more interminable emails (trying to explain feeeeeeeelings and self-discovery, self-compassion, on and on--plus more clearly how awful I'd felt during Rokugate, doubting I'd ever be respected and how discouraging that was).

He'd written earlier a few lines asking if I realized I constantly judge him and it's almost a "compulsion." Fair enough, but consider Mr. OCD....

Anyway, my last (finally short) one was just honest. I have trouble letting go and STOPPING when in this situation, and email sucks for this but I was breaking my own boundary by continuing, and he'd be doing me a real favor not to respond.

And he hasn't, bless 'im. So nuts. So miserable. So exhausting.

I THINK I'm free of obsessing about this until early October. Whew.

Thank you thank you...
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on July 16, 2020, 06:16:48 AM
Well compulsions are understandable, Hops, but if he does contact you again I hope you'll be able to just ignore/delete/block or whatever's most appropriate.  I think CB's spot on with you deciding whether you want to see him in October and you contacting him if you do.  I don't expect you'll be thinking about a new man just now but by October - well you could well be having a great time getting to know someone online or via the phone (people are doing Zoom dates!  lol).  Or just be feeling very happy and content with yourself, your friends and Pooch, and not feel the need to add M back in to the mix.  So I hope in the meantime you can rest, recuperate, take Pooch for long walks, chit chat to people and if he pops up, just put him back in his box for the time being - in a contactless manner :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 16, 2020, 06:29:28 AM
That's a very good plan, Tupp.
I'm not too worried about who calls whom in October, and in fact I was the one to "slip" and email him last...he's backed off. He's not stalky, really. I need to let it go too. Despite all my upset about him, real attachment is still there and it'll take time.

I do need the time and space to just see where I am later. (It would be astonishing if we met in October and he'd gone to see someone about the raging ADHD, had taken some Rx, and all of a sudden he was in control of himself and more able to focus outward, listen, and things go well....blah blah.) That's exactly how I can spin off into fantasizing and I'm not going to let myself.

Meanwhile, still thinking of him a lot.

I think for now I'll do myself more good if I stay focused on home, garden, exercise, decluttering, those Zoom times with friends (not new men yet, though I'd like to know how one finds Zoom dating), and even...writing. It'll be very good for me.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on July 16, 2020, 09:13:39 AM
That's a very good plan, Tupp.
I'm not too worried about who calls whom in October, and in fact I was the one to "slip" and email him last...he's backed off. He's not stalky, really. I need to let it go too. Despite all my upset about him, real attachment is still there and it'll take time.

I do need the time and space to just see where I am later. (It would be astonishing if we met in October and he'd gone to see someone about the raging ADHD, had taken some Rx, and all of a sudden he was in control of himself and more able to focus outward, listen, and things go well....blah blah.) That's exactly how I can spin off into fantasizing and I'm not going to let myself.

Meanwhile, still thinking of him a lot.

I think for now I'll do myself more good if I stay focused on home, garden, exercise, decluttering, those Zoom times with friends (not new men yet, though I'd like to know how one finds Zoom dating), and even...writing. It'll be very good for me.

hugs
Hops

I think all of those things are great things to focus on, Hops, and yep, feelings don't just vanish.  Which makes it hard!  But it gets easier over time, I think.

I read about a couple who did a first date over Zoom - apparently they both cooked the same meal, did wine and candles and got all dressed up and then sat and ate together via their laptops :)  Sounded a bit too techno for me but needs must and all that - I'd probably be more up for it if I were younger and had less of a 'can't be arsed' attitude.  Maybe the situation with M will inspire some more fabulous poetry from you :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 16, 2020, 12:38:49 PM
I think you have a good plan there Hops. Yeah, it's hard to break habits - even ones you know will prolong the "agony". Time to reinforce Hops' life - and what she wants it to be - and absorb the joy and care/comfort you derive from it.

Famous advice, from the most famous Femme Movie-N-Fatale of all time: There's plenty of time to think about this tomorrow.... tho' your cottage is likely warmer & more cozy than Tara.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 16, 2020, 11:39:17 PM
It's rough and I feel a little crazed. I had gotten so accustomed to our rituals, but began to realize that in some undefined way I was letting myself drain away and just adapting to M's needs. He has such a strong tendency to build rituals (and OCDish personality) and I have had a strong capacity to adapt to others' preferences for those things (from Nmom, and the old folks) that I was daily bothered by things I didn't enjoy but not asserting myself calmly about them.

Silly example, but it would get under my skin because it is N-ish and to me, too childlike. He'd send me emails that said nothing except a little trumpet blast about himself: I'm leaving for my walk! I did this and this and this and this today! Lots of exclamation points!!!! I hate the overuse of exclamation points!!!!! It feels juvenile on the page!!!!!! And he so rarely imagined my day or asked a question about me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I also got less and less energetic myself the more he sent me his manic reports about his own (extreme) productivity. Just began building a sense that domestic life with him wouldn't feel good. He'd be driven to lead it and organize it and manage it, and I'd numbly turn back into Cinderella. A lazy Cinderella and resentful one.

Not mature on my part, either. But I just think that's how our energies and styles would wind up grinding me down. Nothing wicked about the way he is, but I don't think it'd be a good fit for me. I think he needs a much more traditional woman who is bright, loves everything he loves, and just goes along happily.

Sigh. I still miss him. Believe it or not, he's also fun and sweet and for a long time, felt comforting. Security is a dream, too. But I think the complications of his Nish stuff and ego and all that bigness, would do me in. And my sensitivity and stubbornness wouldn't be fun for him, either.

I want a PEACEFUL, shared old age. And an empathetic connection we never could build.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on July 17, 2020, 02:24:33 AM
I think a lot of things are to do with context and compatibility, Hopsie.  I know couples who text each other constantly through the day - everything they're doing, who they're with, pictures of what they're having for lunch.  It would drive me nuts.  A lot of women I know like receiving lots of contacts - it makes them feel wanted.  I just feel irritated - I want to get on with my day and then yes, let's have a conversation tonight and catch up on each other's news (what do people talk about when they always know what the other one is doing anyway?  Too much for my little brain to compute).  I think there's such a difference between someone contacting you to tell you what they're doing (I'm going out for a walk !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) and someone taking a picture of a tree or a bird they know you'd like whilst out walking, and then sending it to you.  I do think the first says "I'm thinking about me!!!!!!!!!!" while the second says, "I'm thinking about you". 

And it's so easy to find you're the one making most of the accommodations.  I think we all start relationships happy to be flexible, try new things, be open to new experiences.  But it's easy to suddenly find that you're doing everything on someone else's terms and that you've got lost in there somewhere.  And it's also perfectly possible to be sweet and kind and funny (as M is) and still have traits that just make being together very difficult.  It's okay to miss him xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 17, 2020, 02:58:13 AM
You're SO right, Tupp. Thanks.

I loved this. You often come out with a summary sentence that just nails the heart of an issue. With his frequent emails, this was exactly it:

Quote
the first says "I'm thinking about me!!!!!!!!!!" while the second says, "I'm thinking about you"

We never texted, thank god, since I hate texting physically, hate cell phones socially, and mostly ignore mine. The exception I did love was pix of his baby granddaughter. Sigh. And I'd send him a few of Pooch, whom he loves. Sigh again.

I have to admit something odd, though. I woke up from a nap (I can crash in the early evening for several hours and then be awake half the night) -- and suddenly felt happy. I am still sad but I'm ALSO happy, because I just sensed a lot of emotional pressure is gone.

I got a sudden realization that M is all the complicated stuff he is, that would make him an impossible life partner...but I think IF I decide to see him for a picnic in the fall, I won't be likely to fall back down the rabbit hole. What I was imagining instead was offering him compassion and friendship if that feels wise then.. On my own terms. (Oddly, I think reading the book about D. Trump's family gave me a sense that though M always sanitized his parents, I think he was missing something important early in his development, too. He's no Trump--loathes the man--but I'm starting to understand that he is still in some similar ways a child desperate for attention.)

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on July 17, 2020, 05:16:57 AM
You are a wise and sensible woman, Hops, so if you get to a point where you and M could share a meal from time to time and swap pics of cute babies and Pooch looking adorable then you will and you will notice if it starts to become troublesome, as well.  I think many of us are damaged by our early experiences, in many different ways, and a lot of us manage to avoid dealing with it by getting lucky with a partner early on or doing well in our carers.  I think for people like you (and all of us on here, I think), the need to dig and figure things out can be a blessing and a curse.  We get to know ourselves better and heal a lot of hurt, I think.  But it also sets the bar higher and I know I have a hard time with people now because I kind of need them to be at a certain level of self awareness not to find them exhausting really quickly and that makes it harder.  Sometimes I look back on my younger days when I could happily sit with just about anyone and cushion myself with booze or drugs and just have a nice time.  I need the connection to be real and authentic now and that's so much harder to come by.  I think it's probably true for all of us.  I'm glad to read that you felt that happiness, with that emotional pressure releasing.  That's good to know. xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 17, 2020, 11:30:05 AM
Thanks, ((((CB))))--

I am so glad you and your M were able to get to the healthy, well-boundaried friendship that you have today. And that you have each other's backs still, if there were a crisis. (I am thinking of offering that support to M as well. He has twice said to me since I ended the romantic lifelong commitment part, let me know if you need anything, and I believe he meant it.)

I don't know if he would be punitive. I had a strong reaction to his comment about "paying a price" because I chose "'total' independence" -- and do think that was unconsciously punitive. But it was also his hurt speaking, I'm sure. Time will tell whether that punitive impulse was transient for him, or if it'll harden into a general attitude of blame or payback. If that happened, I wouldn't be interested in friendship anyway.

I did notice that he went swiftly back to formality in his emails "Do let me know if you have a change of heart" and that during the T session, he slammed the lid on his feelings. I think he'll mask all that. If he hadn't, had said truthful emotional things such as, "I'm feeling devastated, is there anything I can do to change your mind?" I'd have had more hope for us. He only said something about his feelings after I'd poured out mine: "I am hurting. I miss you. I have fears of living alone for the rest of my life, I have security fears as well, , etc." He just wrote back, I don't want to be alone in old age either. You are unique and you are the best." But it wasn't ... I don't know what. Revealing anything more, I guess.

One of the things that makes intimacy possible is both people willing to risk vulnerability with the other. I think both of us have had problems with that. I'm leery of letting down my guard because I arrive with my men-baggage and because he's so controlling, even if he often means well by his compulsion to "take over and fix this" -- it doesn't feel like empathy. And though he's fairly freely shared his neediness when he was in its grip, he came across like a frantic child rather than a vulnerable adult, sharing. Although I've been kind to that whirlwind child, I haven't felt warm about soothing him. Instead, I withdraw, which isn't the same as honestly saying in the moment, "I feel swamped and overwhelmed by your demands for attention."

On balance, I think his attachment to his mask of competence is very strong. And my fear of being dominated (a fairly realistic one, imo) is very strong too. Somehow, we have missed the boat on equal sharing of what's inside. In therapy, I'd pour out descriptions of how I was feeling or how I reacted inside to various incidents. M would mostly argue or defend himself with an alternative narrative. He never got to "empathic listening" but I think he never learned it. I also believe he may have the classic "protect the inner self from feeling shame at all costs" reactions. I've been learning that's why it's so hard for some people to genuinely apologize -- to admit ANY mistake is to risk internal meltdown, because the sense of self is so fragile. Those are SO hard to dislodge, and if he's a total-N, which so far I haven't wanted to believe, it would be nearly impossible for him, unless he threw his heart into deep therapy, which is basically what I've conveyed to him.

It would be amazing if he did, but I believe it's extremely, extremely unlikely. That would be one thing I'd listen for in October. Willingness to say something about whether he's continued, whether he chose the Sikh or remained with the less-insightful young MSW, and whether he is willing to be vulnerable enough to tell me anything vulnerable about what he was learning/unearthing. Without that, going forward or renewing anything would be very unwise on my part.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 17, 2020, 04:28:17 PM
Hmmmmmmm.....(I love Carolyn Hax):

Quote
Q: Is there really always another bus?
I am 65 and would probably dump my boyfriend except for my belief that the chances of ever replacing him are slim to none. I was online for many years (with no good results) before we rekindled an old romance. I reached out to him on Facebook. I hadn't seen him in 30 years. We had lived together for one year back in '83-'84. For the most part he's a good boyfriend (affectionate, very helpful, generous, great sex partner, cooperative, funny) but when he's angry, he becomes verbally explosive and abusive. The things he says suggest he really doesn't like me, deep down. I'm very middle class, white collar, professional, highly educated. He has a high school diploma and is in construction. We have value differences that I believe make it hard to get along at times. That being said, as wonderful as I think I am, I don't believe I would find someone else at this age, as I've tried and it didn't happen. If I leave him, I'd give up a good sex life, a help mate, someone who "has my back." Essentially, I'd be alone. Which typically is OK with me, but as I get older I think it might be of benefit to have someone in my corner. (And yes, I know people die.) We tried couples therapy and he walked out during session 6. He's now in individual therapy. I've had a therapist most of my life. As I write this, it seems like I need to ask myself, can I tolerate his tantrums on occasion to compensate for the all the benefits of the relationship. And did I say, he's very handsome and I enjoy just looking at him? Too good to leave? Too bad to stay?

A: Carolyn Hax
There's an icky film that wants acknowledging--he's verbally abusive but, gosh, so hot?--and now that I've done that, I'm going to talk about something else.

Any time you're telling yourself to take a bad relationship because it's the best you can do, you're killing your soul a little.

Since you used the bus metaphor, I'll say where the bus metaphor is useful: voting. Take the bus (candidate) that gets you as close as possible to where you want to be, knowing perfection is not an option.

But when it comes to your companionship, commit to living your best life. That means asking yourself: Are you better for having this person in your life, or worse? Do you like yourself with this person, or not? It's about the value of what you have, in its own right, not its value relative to something else. It's the latter that brings the ick.

— JUL 17, 2020 12:57 EDT
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: CB123 on July 17, 2020, 06:06:30 PM
What she said.
And as a P.S.: There are helluva a lot of things worse than living alone, and that relationship sounds like one of them.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 17, 2020, 06:23:29 PM
I have this picture of Hops in my head...
perfectly content being a homebody - the virus distancing not being a problem for her. Lots of quiet time, pleasurable small social meetups with good close friends... and introverted solo pursuits. There exists an awareness of a need for security and companionship... or at least the wish for that.

Describing the character of a potential Mr. Right....
Emotionally strong; stable. Always there when you need him. Attractive, but in a quiet way. Maybe someone with an affinity for gardening or animals... practical handyman... but educated and well-read... but without a neon-sign advertising it all the time. Someone who is patient and caring; and appreciates some skittishness about old wounds and is gentle with them. Funny in a "real people" sorta way; able to poke fun at himself and tell tales on himself. Someone secure in who he is, what he has/wants to give and how... who doesn't have anything to prove to the world,  but will knock himself out to impress you Hops.

Someone comfortably retired - who isn't reliving "past glory" all the time. The kind of guy who'll say - "you didn't have to do that for me" when you surprise them.

(And no I have no plans to become an "over-60 romance genre writer"..... LOL. But ya gotta admit - it's a niche not many are writing about...)
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 17, 2020, 07:44:07 PM
Damn, Amber, sign me up for your book club!
What a lovely, lovely vision -- thank you. I really will hold that ... soooo good. And your vision of how I can live on my own is a good one too. Thanks.

CB, luckily M was never verbally explosive or abusive. That would make all wobbling irrelevant. At least I have that much healthiness and self esteem.

I am committed to not "villainizing" him, while also not "pretzelizing" me. I think we'll both be okay in the long run whether we ever see each other again or not. And I don't regret the relationship for a moment. I'm very grateful it happened. He woke me up from a kind of buried state where I'd just gone numb. I'm not now.

And that HELPS. I am more solid and grounded than I knew. Plenty o' future.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 17, 2020, 08:39:20 PM
LOLOLOLOL. I'm smiling & happy you liked it Hops. Cheers.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: CB123 on July 17, 2020, 08:46:58 PM
Perfect, Hops! No villianizing (unless dealing with a villian)!

.....and I was responding to the Carolyn Hax post about the guy who was being abusive....? Where you wrote Hmmmmmm?

Anyway, glad you are excited for the future.

CB
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 18, 2020, 07:00:37 AM
Oh I'm sorry, CB.
Duh.
I think my head is spinning now and I morphed it into some of your concerns about my relationship with M...which, as it turns out, were very wise observations.

Didn't mean to confuse the two...I should keep Hax outta here!

HUGS and grateful ones,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on July 20, 2020, 02:49:09 AM
I'm glad you're not like the lady in that story, Hops.  It makes me so sad when women feel a bad relationship is better than being alone.  So sad.  I'm glad you didn't feel that you needed to stay, no matter what xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 20, 2020, 06:33:52 AM
Thanks, Tupp.

It's sinking in and though I still feel it was the right decision,
it's not easy. Had a pretty down day yesterday. It's just the
feeling of isolation is much more than it would have been just
after a "normal" breakup, I think. For several reasons:

--pandemic/quarantining means a lot of time (nearly all) alone
--now that I'm 70 I'm less confident about ever finding a new partner
--when I wake up in the morning I think of M first, just there it is

I know all this will ease in time (except perhaps the finding someone bit).
And I made the decision I felt I had to make.
Still, the peace does come with a price.

I know M is probably suffering too at the moment, and it's tough
to think about that. I do miss aspects of being with him a lot.

All that said, I'm hanging in. Need to get outdoors again as my garden
is withering.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on July 20, 2020, 09:15:20 AM
It is hard, I think more so if there are lots of good bits as well.  And yes, as you say, age, pandemic, these are factors and very big ones!  It's equally hard when you know you could be with someone and you kind of convince yourself you could ignore or cope with the bad bits (I know I've done that myself in the past).  I hope it all starts to get easier in time, Hops xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 20, 2020, 10:30:22 AM
Thanks, ((((Tupp)))).
I really appreciate your empathy.

I agree, it will get easier with time.
I'm confident of that.

I need to be patient with the day by
day healing. Lots of little fissures need
to knit together, so I need to be kind
to myself too--and calm.

(Not my constant M.O. but I know it's
what's needed.)

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: CB123 on July 20, 2020, 10:36:36 AM
Thinking of you, Hops. Hoping you have a very peaceful day today.

CB
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 20, 2020, 10:48:49 AM
Thanks, ((((CB)))).

I fought back the down-lassitude enough this
morning to get out and water, and in the nick
of time. Was very excited to see my first ripe
cherry tomatoes -- they're a heritage golden
yellow version.

And the chard is going like gangbusters still.
Everything else seemed pretty pooped out.
Carrots had been coming along (another heritage
seed that produced whitish carrots with an earthier
flabor) but something ate off all their tops.

I have a suspect. This morning when Pooch and
I went out the side door, a small bunnywabbit
was just sitting there, enjoying the view into
the long back yard. Didn't budge until Pooch
came out, tentatively, and then pulled back.

My 20-pound dog just retreated from a wabbit.
Oh, the shame of it.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on July 21, 2020, 10:31:31 AM
Poor pooch: ) 

I'm happy to read your garden is producing yummy warm fresh things for you still.

I haven't checked my tomatoes in a while.
Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 21, 2020, 05:12:39 PM
I know, Pooch must have been so traumatized
(by the sight of a bunnywabbit half her size...).

:)
Good luck with your tomatoes!

Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on July 23, 2020, 08:17:15 PM
You sound good, Hops.

I'm sorry things didn't work out as you'd hoped.  Perhaps this is practice for what comes next. 

Something wonderful, this way comes.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 23, 2020, 10:46:43 PM
Well, I'm always reluctant to predict or fantasize about romance...but thanks for the thought.

I've learned that keeping my feet firmly on the ground for as long as I can is a big help in retaining enough relationship with myself to save myself from long-term harm, I think. Even with this relationship, a year and five months before I accepted it couldn't work long term was progress. I've spent far far longer in mismatches at other points in my life, and don't regret this relationship, so by my snaily standards, this is growth.

Just growth for me, though. Doesn't guarantee anything about anyone I may meet.

Meanwhile, I'm growing in more ways than one...have been putting on weight with emotional eating. Not happy about that. Too much food in the house to get through quarantine, and lack of activity due to heat...and isolation. Hope to get a grip soon.

thanks,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on July 27, 2020, 08:32:03 PM
Well, at the risk of giving y'all a case of the head-snap...
I'd like to say I just had a lovely Zoom chat with a very nice gentleman.
(I think deep down, I have a fair amount of tolerance for risk taking.)

What happened was that on a neighborhood website, a man posted a sincere request for recommendations for good couples counselors, because he was trying to help friends of his. I leaped to recommend the Sikh with a few descriptive lines. The man wrote me back his appreciation, saying it was the "fullest" response he'd received.

I thought: nice, clearly my generation, educated, why not? So I replied, I'm finding this quarantine really wearing and wonder if you might have a nice divorced/widowed friend who likewise might enjoy practicing Zoom conversation?

He replied he did...gave some details. I replied again, great, happy to, give him my email, etc. And then he replied...it's me.

Long story shorter, we yakked away for almost an hour and a half this afternoon and both enjoyed it. I'm sure we could be friends in "normal" life, and said so. He said the same.

Just FRIEND stuff, but I feel proud of myself for reaching out. One never knows!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on July 28, 2020, 04:50:14 AM
Oh, Hops, that's great news, I'm really proud of you as well!  How lovely, a new lockdown friend, that interesting 'getting to know you' phase and I like the fact he was looking for a therapist for friends of his - indicates he values a bit of outside support and introspection when needed, I would have thought :)  Aw, how lovely.  That's really nice, positive news.  Does him posting on your neighbourhood website mean he lives in your area as well or is the area his friends live in?  I'm very excited to read this update :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 28, 2020, 07:13:01 AM
:D

Good news, Hops. There's not a thing wrong with adding a new friend. And who knows? Perhaps at some point, things will shift into something more later. It does happen. But being friends first, is the perfect way to determine how many layers of masks there are to the person - and just what they might be trying to cover up. Without having so much at risk yourself.

For as much as you are clearly an introvert, you genuinely have an interest in people; and care about them as human beings. And you value your connection with other people. I'm happy you reached out to this one - and that it's evolved into occasional companionship already. As far as I'm concerned, a comfortable companionship is 90% of what makes long term relationships work. Sounds old fashioned - but we're already from a past century right? LOLOLOL.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on July 28, 2020, 01:27:55 PM
Really good news, Hops.

I have more connection, now with COVID, than I have in the last 15 years before.  People are reaching out more on neighborhood boards, as your new friend did.  We have chances to encounter more people, and people seem to be posting about smaller things they're interested in.  I just learned my new moss friend moved into the neighborhood the same year I did.... we've been a mile apart for FIVE years!  Just crazy it took COVID to find each other. 

And... of course this gentleman was impressed with your recommendation. You're a wonderful, thoughtful writer.  He's likely enchanted.  Have fun!

Another bright spot in quarantine, IME.

Lighter



Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on August 01, 2020, 02:24:21 PM
Thanks, everybody. I truly enjoyed it...no regrets.

I've noticed, however, that despite me saying at the end of our chat how much I enjoyed it, and that we could do it again (and him agreeing)...crickets.

I'm not too focused on this, but notice that my thoughts are running in the direction of reciprocity (lacking). I reached out in the first place, he did respond, and so I'm thinking (like an adolescent)...who moves next?

And I have a sort of stubbornness about not wanting to contact him again. I am very leery of being the bold one, the one who drives some connection. I want it reciprocal. At the same time, he did mention that he's "shy."

So perhaps I'll contact him Monday to say something. Maybe like, Want to Zoom again? And just see what he says. That's not too vulnerable or revealing.

But if I do that the once, I think it'd be wise to actually tell him about how I feel about reciprocity.

I've been down the one-way who's-pursuing road before, and never want to again.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on August 01, 2020, 03:05:15 PM
Hops, that makes complete sense to me.

YOU being completely authentic, honest and up front about yourself, and your expectations.... that's good information and you're entitled to speak and have your opinions and make your moves.

Dropping expectations, around what he does, is important too, I think. 

You can only control yourself and your choices.  Step up.  Listen to your intuition.  Be brave.  Don't fear the outcome.  Get curious about it.

I think bravely being yourself will move you through decisions and outcomes more quickly. 

I have no problem asking someone for time or attention, though it's morphed through the years into a what I want, rather than what I need.... as something OUTSIDE myself to BRING ME HAPPINESS.   Now it's just desire for healthy connection, and I'm entitled to that.   It's not a big thing to ask for.  It's OK to seek it out and it's OK when it doesn't work out the way we would have hoped.

I guess the big things is.... to remember you aren't asking for a wedding date here.

It's just a chat, or coffee, and it's OK no matter what happens.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: CB123 on August 01, 2020, 03:10:43 PM
Hops,
I think you should contact him again on Monday. He might be shy. Or distracted.

But I dont think you should say anything to him about how you feel about reciprocity. That just adds a layer of "ought". If he can reach out to you and initiate, he will. If he can't, I think it would be great for you to know that. If you contact him on Monday and you wait to see what he does, and he doesnt call back, it's not weird to let it float away like it would be later in a relationship.

How do those things work--the neighborhood boards? I'm on one, but I have only checked in a couple of times. I dont know if they include real names or addresses or anything. Would it help to have any of that?

Love
CB
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on August 01, 2020, 07:31:17 PM
Thanks, Lighter.
I agree with and appreciate all your advice.
Nope, no wedding bell accelerations...just was a little sorry he hadn't been in touch.
And you're right, it's okay no matter what.

But I'll remedy that with what CB suggested...just contact him (email) and see what happens next. I also appreciated your wisdom, CB, that getting all heavy about "reciprocity" would be more weight than this skimpy contact merits. Look for actions rather than instructing him, sounds very smart.

I so appreciate youse guys. Thank you.

hugs
Hops

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on August 28, 2020, 09:54:03 PM
Well, new friend and I had our fourth Zoom yak today and it was very pleasant. We agreed nothing at stake, and just nice to have such very frank conversation with a new person. (He mentioned "we're not looking for marriage" which was good for me to take note of, not that I'm viewing him romantically, at least not now. I am firm on the "friends first" philosophy Amber mentioned, so if that's the level it stays on, that's fine too.)

He's uber-cerebral and makes M's use of high-flown vocabulary seem lightweight. Whew. It's fun, but after an hour and a half I need a nap, kinda thing. Both brains steaming and the words and concepts flying.

It was nice hearing him talk about a long and happy marriage. Despite it being two years, he's clearly still healing and grieving. He's quirky and in some ways kind of antisocial, or emptysocial is more like it. But I enjoy the company and the talking. So that's that. I didn't tell him about the ED visit. Did tell him in summary about my D, and his response was comforting, attuned. What a contrast. He understood what had happened and didn't play out "oh I'm traumatized you even told me" kind of thing I've dealt with 50 too many times in the last 8 years. I appreciated that.

We may do an outside-sit kind of meet before the cold kicks in. I'd enjoy that.

Meanwhile it's a low-stress adventure via Zoom!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: lighter on August 28, 2020, 11:26:45 PM
Nice, Hops.
 A relaxed face to face sounds like welcome diversion to me.  I bet he's glad to talk to someone who can understand all his big words; )

That he understood your situation with dd seems comforting.... not to have to comfort the listener is a relief.  Finding a compassionate ear is validating and welcome.  I'm glad you had a positive experience.

I picture you and Pooch greeting him on your patio with snacks and beverages.  It makes my heart feel glad.  I wonder if he'll ask if he can bring something.  What would you say?

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Twoapenny on August 29, 2020, 07:40:51 AM
That sounds nice, Hops, he sounds like good company, virtual or otherwise, and I like the fact he was happily married.  It implies less baggage to sift through, friend or otherwise.  And nice for you to just be able to talk to someone and not have all the mental mind leaps that go with a possible relationship.  Good to have a Zoom buddy and maybe a real life one, too xx
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: sKePTiKal on August 29, 2020, 10:43:54 AM
Excellent Hops! Be friends; get to know him. Let him get to know you too. Just be together.
No expectations of more - just be together and respect each other; learn each other's boundaries and enjoy yourself.

That's more than enough to entertain, right now.
Title: Re: Relationship
Post by: Hopalong on September 08, 2020, 08:44:38 PM
Had another Zoomyak with new friend this afternoon and it was very enjoyable. We're both verbose and really enjoy lively/intense conversation. He's firmly in friend-zone in my head and I think that's mutual, so it's comfortably low-pressure entertainment/company. We alternate booking Zoom, and he mentioned "8-10 days". I think that's a good indicator of how although our enjoyment is mutual, neither of us is fantasizing about anything further.

Meanwhile, I've hopped back on findageezer.com (where I met M) and though anticipation's pretty low given the pandemic, it feels like a healthy question to send into space. Check it every couple of days and let it go, which works fine for me. Nice people. Mostly very *blue-collar guys from surrounding counties and not many highly-educated types, but I don't care. It's just good for me to remind myself I'm viable.

*I love and respect blue-collar guys. Many I know are among the wisest of my effete friends. But because I'm hyper-verbal, a similar if not matching education level does make dialogues more fun. I may learn that a strong and silent working or retired-working man is a much better bet for me. But I think I need another blabber. (I'm not as driven by sexy muscles these days....ain't blind but ain't young either.)

I've been thinking I will be seeing M in about a month for a reunion conversation; we'll likely meet at a winery and catch up that way. I do hope it goes well so we might be friends. But I'm still firm in my clarity about not committing to him for life or for marriage. Disappointing but self-preserving. I'll be genuinely delighted to see him, but not with the hope of rekindling some fantasy future. I don't really know where he'll be about us, but I'll learn that when I see him.

Future fears are present again, which makes sense, and I'm trying to address them calmly.

Relationship right now needs to be primarily with myself, my friends, my familiar UU community. I remind myself I am phenomenally lucky to have two friends right here--one next door (less intimate but very loyal to the idea of neighbors being neighbors), and one across the street (the one I called for a ride to the ER in the middle of the night, who offered "sisterhood.")

We don't check in or talk daily but I'm sure as we all get even older we'll be there for each other if someone needs help. I've also taken some bread to a guy two doors up who came to my house one day with next-door friend to help with a plumbing crisis. He's just had surgery. He's not friend-material but just having that neighbor-conscience is a good thing to do.

Back to M...what said a lot to me was that I felt real loss and grief for only a couple weeks. I bounced back into myself and felt great relief. And that was a big clear message that my perceptions of the personality obstacles (and how I could handle them or not) were right for me to respond to by breaking it off. HARD decision but I'm still convinced, the right one.

I might have lived longer (and definitely more comfortably economically) with M, but on the other hand the stress of always having to push back against his unconscious and automatic dominance was undermining my well being. Haven't changed my mind.

Who knows, one day I might regret it. So far, though, I truly don't. I wish I had a mate and still hope to find one, but day to day I'm a lot more relaxed.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 09, 2020, 08:51:46 AM
I think I overstated "only two weeks" of real loss and grief. That's not really accurate. I have felt the loss of M for months, but stuffed it by overeating. Just got aware of that cause-effect last week, I think.

What was happening in July after the breakup, I think, is that at the SAME time I was feeling grief over the loss of M and a dream partnership  ... I was simultaneously feeling such relief. The chronic tension flowed out of my shoulders. I didn't feel as though I had an invisible leash on. I wasn't rewiring my brain to live in a subtly always-stressed state and accept constant tugs on the leash. (Ritualistic emails with no content and loads of XXXXXOOOOs during the day. Loads of self-praise in most. No substance....and instead of reading them as hugs I read them as "pokes." Poor M, I'm sure I misjudged him often and likely unfairly, but that's the truth of how it felt. I think because he had demanded attention in such an INTENSE way when our relationship was growing...it was hard to relax into responding to him in a mellow way. Every inch yielded to his forceful energy about how life should go left me feeling an inch more lost. Plus, I brought in my anxiety over control and dominance inner-contradicted by a reflexive desire to please--got busy learning HIS stuff and losing track of my own.)

I hope I never do that again, if I'm lucky enough to find a new partner sometime. Somebody with thicker skin and clearer boundaries might have done better and still be with M, enjoying the pleasures and security without all the stress.

Nothing nefarious about them, but M's OCDish rigidities and rituals came smack against my decades of freedom to float and find out where my mind wanted to wander. He liked to have me for dinner every Wednesday and every Saturday. Every time it was a performance and I learned my role: to admiringly watch and comment on and praise his clever cooking and likewise during the meal to keep it up. It either wore me out or bored me out. Sad, that I couldn't be generous enough to keep that ritual afloat, because it obviously anchors his life. And I sure enjoyed the eating...

It's just that it was so unvarying. Nothing spontaneous, except ingredients. Even if I'd suggest, how about I pick up Indian (wishing he'd say sure, that'd be great--and we'd be done with it) -- every single decision about what we were going to eat was discussed with such over-seriousness that I wanted to escape. Discussed at ponderous length. Discussed as though it was the most important decision of the day, which to M it likely was. And that's no crime on his part! I just couldn't handle the intense and endlessly repetitive focus on food. He needs a foodie-woman.

Why am I repetitively discussing M again all of a sudden? I think it's because I'm excited about seeing him again next month, and when he's crossed my mind lately I've felt a little surge of love and affection over how good it will be to see his face.

I know it's not common for ex-mates to become just-friends but I hope we can pull it off.

Thanks for listening, y'all.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 10, 2020, 01:13:36 PM
Hmmm. Glad I wrote the above since it helps me remember what happened and why.

One thing about the daily several emails....in other circumstances, with another personality, I'd probably LOVE that form of staying connected and close.

I couldn't with M. And until I re-read my summary above, I'd forgotten.

M's emails were ALL and almost ALWAYS about him. I know he thought he was being affectionate with the XXXXXX and OOOOOOs. For him, he was. But I would honestly say that 1 in 25 of his breathless emails about everything he was doing and thinking...would he say something like "how are you doing?".

The man did not ask me any questions about myself. I was a human sound absorber. That was the deep downside. He just didn't have insight into how his personality affected others.

This was helpful, though it's probably boring to revisit. Skip at will! It just helped me to remind myself that I had multiple very good reasons for my choice. I'm remembering dazzling- or cute-puppy M. Not regularly deaf-to-me M.

Whew--
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Meh on September 11, 2020, 02:22:40 AM
Hops, I think it's cool to write and write, who knows what will come out of it and you probably don't have to justify or apologize for it.

So you are single now? At least you got a little wine and dine out of it for a bit. This was the man who could not give you some personal space occasionally correct? (I'm not sure how many guys there are :P)

I've not been keeping up with everything here, I only pop in during green moons. I'm so lost. If you are seeing him again I doubt he has given up the idea of two. 
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on September 11, 2020, 03:00:26 AM
Hmmm. Glad I wrote the above since it helps me remember what happened and why.

One thing about the daily several emails....in other circumstances, with another personality, I'd probably LOVE that form of staying connected and close.

I couldn't with M. And until I re-read my summary above, I'd forgotten.

M's emails were ALL and almost ALWAYS about him. I know he thought he was being affectionate with the XXXXXX and OOOOOOs. For him, he was. But I would honestly say that 1 in 25 of his breathless emails about everything he was doing and thinking...would he say something like "how are you doing?".

The man did not ask me any questions about myself. I was a human sound absorber. That was the deep downside. He just didn't have insight into how his personality affected others.

This was helpful, though it's probably boring to revisit. Skip at will! It just helped me to remind myself that I had multiple very good reasons for my choice. I'm remembering dazzling- or cute-puppy M. Not regularly deaf-to-me M.

Whew--
Hops

I think it's very normal to look back and remember the rosy aspects more - and a good reassurance that the relationship didn't do any lasting damage or create ongoing difficulties in your life.  I think some people are a bit like getting drunk. I love getting drunk, I love the feeling of freedom, of not caring, of being silly and uninhibited - but I feel terribly ill the next day and I often end up doing stupid things I wish I hadn't.  I think people can be like that - some parts of them are great but other bits aren't good for you and so, as a package, they're best avoided.  I don't drink anymore because I can't cope with the hangovers.  You aren't in a relationship with M any more because he did too many things that drove you nuts.  Maybe a friendly meet up drink every now and again will be nice.  Maybe it will remind you why you ended it.  I think it's okay to appreciate the bits that were good and kind of nice to focus on them rather than ruminate about the things that weren't great (says the Mistress of Rumination over here :) ).  It reminded me a bit of what you said about your old gent, Hops, who gave you a deal on the car.  For him that was a great gift.  I think maybe for M the descriptions of food and the rituals of cooking and the xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx in the emails is how he shows love - but not how you recognise it.  Nothing wrong with either, just not a good match.  And you know, it's tough at the moment, we all need some nice stuff to look back on and think about.  I think it's okay to think about the rosy bits and just every now and again remind yourself of the other stuff :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 11, 2020, 08:25:00 AM
You're right, Tupp. M explicitly stated was that food was how he showed love. (It was also how he showed off.) I believe there was love in it but also obsession. If I am lucky I'll one day find a man who knows that listening is a way to show love. M's difficulty with that was extreme.

Maybe I'm just ruminating a little as a bit of a warning to not slide back into things with him once we meet. Trying to keep the full picture in mind. Especially if I'm extra lonely or limping or dreading winter isolation. But the rosy bits will be his charm and energy and intelligence and I'm looking forward to seeing him next month! Plus, Pooch will be over the moon.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 12, 2020, 01:06:16 PM
Sorry, (((Scabby))), forgot to answer your question. Yup, single again. M was the first serious relationship that lasted longer than a few months in many years. (One year, five months.)

Even though I'm 70 I'm still an optimist. Re-registered on a dating site for older people and am having a nice conversation with one (he lives 45 minutes away, not super far, but has no intention of ever leaving his town, so anything committed's unlikely). But I'd like to meet him at some point, I think. Otherwise, I just check it every couple days and reply nicely "no thanks" to most of my messages. There aren't a ton but it's a positive possibility so I just do it anyway.

No idea what'll happen. The new male friend I just Zoom-yak with is a treat and local. But just friend.

It's all good for me, as it eases isolation, and with a friendly word, I can ease somebody else's too.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on September 12, 2020, 03:35:19 PM
The zoom chat sounds like a nice respite, Hops.  How long are the chats?
Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 12, 2020, 06:39:38 PM
It is fun so far, Lighter!
We have usually talked around an hour and a half.

With wine.

:)
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Meh on September 12, 2020, 07:07:43 PM
SM was the first serious relationship that lasted longer than a few months in many years. (One year, five months.)

I mean I am glad for you Hops, even imperfect romance is very nice, even the temporary kind. It's worth something for sure.

It's awesome that you are using a dating site for older people, dating sites are becoming ubiquitous to our society. I wonder what kind of sociology/psychology books people have written about dating sites, I don't have time to read them, maybe another day.

Still it makes me wonder how the process of shopping online for a person has changed dating because that's what dating sites remind me of.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 12, 2020, 07:49:52 PM
M used to joke that he "found me in a catalog."

Already have a new connection (likely friend) that will be fun. He asked if I'd like to meet.

Woo hoo! We'll see each others' foreheads! So exciting.

No details yet, won't be for a few weeks.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on September 14, 2020, 06:34:02 AM
Have you and M had any contact at all, Hopsie, or did you both stick to the no contact thing?  I'm glad you've got man friend and maybe man date on the go as well, it is nice to have the social contact (albeit distanced) and to have possibilities in front of you, I think. 

I do get what you're saying about the obsessive thing with food.  I have a couple of friends like that and they're lovely, I love them to bits, but food is on their mind literally all the time - what they ate, where they're eating next, how it will be cooked, which wine to have with it.  They are genuinely making a two hundred mile round trip to go to a restaurant they both like.  It's a level of interest that I can't quite get my head around and I find difficult to enjoy all the time.  I think other people's interests can be tiring if they're not your interests as well (or at least not in the same way.  I do enjoy a nice meal but for me it doesn't go much beyond, "that was lovely - thanks").
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on September 14, 2020, 07:42:38 AM
Hops, one thing about distance relationships I'm excruciatingly aware of... (for a number of reasons)...

is the mind's tendencies to fill in the blanks; use my own imagination to "create" the other person, how we'll be together, what we might DO together... etc. A certain amount of this is simply being interested in the other; is fun & even healthy. I think it is important to check that against a face to face experience, and not in a compressed, fleeting, time-space. Some people simply exude some energies - being themselves - that I can only bear a short amount of time. It would drive me batty in the long haul.

While it's kinda fun to discover things about another person - I don't want to have to guess what the chocolate's filling is THIS time, every time I connect. I like stability & consistency. Predictability. Might sound boring, but even consistent people have their "wild hair" moments; just not as often.

Another thing, is to be completely open - but put part of one's brain into observer mode - when you do have those face to face encounters. Be honest with yourself, about how you feel about x, y, or z in the other person. I think you were doing that with M, after the first couple of "flags" showed up, so I know you got that.

I found my imagination couldn't hold a candle to the real live B, and how I felt, and and what I observed in real life.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 14, 2020, 09:56:28 AM
A couple times, Tupp. He sent me two informational things on Covid and a photo essay about dogs (added that "he'd agonized for a week" over sending that), and I sent him a pic and video of a very large bear crossing the intersection close to his house where he often walks, captioning it "your new neighbor." We each were in a way trying to take care of the other. His dog-pix was different, an attempt to rekindle memories/feelings, but I didn't reply so there was no further back and forth. Slippery slope. Generally, he's respected my boundary.

Amber, couldn't agree with you more. Years ago when I absolutely hit bottom with failed relationships, the #1 cause was that I'd fantasized my brains out about someone I'd only been with a short while, or about what I wanted to happen in future with someone ditto, and became nearly deluded with hopes and fantasy. It was out of great loneliness (living with Nmom) and also an imagination on steroids. And my capacity to rely on not-in-person communications like emails (being a writer) to build the dream. NOT good for me. I was not maturely reckoning with different factors I should have, from the get go.

Since that time I became pretty fierce about forcing myself to embrace, value and respect reality. Reality is my friend became a personal mantra. Likewise, emotional availability and reciprocity.

Your outcome with Buck is one to dream of, but not in my situation something to "expect" or "make happen." As you say, I need to meet and build in the real, observe and enjoy. But first of all, always, observe.

Had a first chat on the phone with the fellow who lives 45 minutes away (in a gorgeous old house, not that I Googled him and even his ex, of course). He's friendly and we enjoyed it. We have a lot in common so he's going to be fun to meet as friends regardless, which we'll do at a winery or brewery halfway in a few weeks (I'm limping and in pain and want to feel better before we do).

He's a "B" too--a storyteller and musician. (Did things professionally similar to my early Poet in the Schools stuff, ran a contra dance program and a traditional music radio show that was well known. Think, fiddle. Still does music gigs.) Was married twice before and is separated from his third wife--I hadn't spotted that. I said I'm not judging but may I ask, were you involved with Wife #2 before the divorce from Wife #1? He said yes, that's what happened, and then Wife #2 years later left him for someone else. I told him his karma was repaired. Red flag down for his honesty, but back up for passive voice (it "happened" rather than "I chose to...").

I lied about not judging because part of me does, but busting myself for blatant hypocrisy corrects me most of the time. During my first marriage when I was so lonely and unhappy I thought I'd break, I had a one night (well, one hour) stupid empty fling with a married man I'd become fixated on at work, who was moving out of state the next day. I felt terribly guilty and confessed. My husband forgave me pretty quickly; on some level he knew he was neglecting me and our child, but I didn't forgive myself for a long time. Much later during the years I lived with my mother, I was working in California half of each month and fell in love with my married boss (who told me his marriage was dead, affectionless, "staying just for the kids" etc.). Again, physically, it was a brief and unsatisfying fling on that level. But I remained in love with him for many wasted years because we were soulmates in ways. Very painful and pointless in the long run. It took place largely in extraordinary correspondence.

I think infidelity happens because we aren't ready either to face facts about our own existing marriage and act responsibly to resolve it one way or another, or if single, we aren't ready to be with a person who is completely free to choose us. Now, I normally do not meet or date anyone who is only separated, not divorced, so I'm a little surprised I am looking forward to meeting this B person. I think it's because of Covid, as I'm so sick of isolation. And he does sound like friend material. He's a good talker. I had come from a depressing two-hour discussion group that got very dark and apocalyptic about politics and he told me a story to cheer me up. It was a long involved ridiculous tale about a man who adopted a centipede. I could see how he did this for schools, other groups and radio and it made me laugh. We also knew a musician in common and had some overlap that way.

Not a whole lot to laugh about these days, so that was nice. BUT...it's against my "rules" so it will be important to me when we meet-at-eight-feet, to be sure that I say to him: "I don't normally meet anyone new on purpose who isn't fully legally free." And I made sure to say on the phone "find new friends" etc. I didn't have trouble understanding his reasoning, I just don't think it's wise. He said the way he looks at it is he won't get the divorce unless "something happens" and there's a reason to. That's his call, maybe he doesn't want to spend the money on it. Then again, how does his ex view it? Since he sees his ex often as they still co-own another property (she lives there and he fixes it up)...I think that's an "emotionally unsafe" position for a new woman in his life, should love happen.

She gets to wait around to see if he reciprocates, but also risks investing a lot of time and feeling in someone who's in limbo and hasn't made a clear decision or isn't inclined to. She could thus if she's not careful invest a lot of time and feeling and remain uncertain and unsure a lot longer than necessary. In that sense I agreed with M, who was always talking about life being too short especially at our age.

So for now, I'm just looking forward to a fun afternoon meet with a fun fellow. But no fantasies. If there's an obvious or potential connection between us that's obvious right away, I'll make sure to say out loud right away: "This has been fun but for my own sake, I won't make plans to see you again until you are legally free. I hope we might connect again once you're free to move on." (My guess is there are financial reasons it hasn't happened so far, his 1920 house would be a money pit.)

Even when you defy them or fail, being raised with rigid morals never quite leaves, I think. Maybe the "B" one-date plan is an experiment with seeing if there's a middle ground I could live with. But I'm too vulnerable to mess about. He's fairly recently separated and probably online because he's lonely like me. At least he didn't lie about it.

Thots?

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on September 14, 2020, 11:48:48 AM
Oh, Hops.

I don't know.  I dated my B during his divorce, which dragged on and on.  Hi finally gave his ex everything to move on, and start again.  I ended up regretting the time I wasted waiting for the divorce to be final. In a way....my time with him feels like I was suspended in amazing energy, emotional safety, reciprocal care and interest in each other and outside activities....looking back, it really feels like a safe bubble I thrived in.  I miss it. 

If you have a true, safe connection with someone....it can be precious.  If you believe you do, but don't, it can be devastating, IME.

It can't be built by one person, IME.

I respect honesty too, but I have to balance it out with my values.  That means I'm better off IF I file honest people according to my values, even though they express desire to change or are honest to the point I over value their honesty and become.....
I have to watch my codependent tendencies is maybe what I mean.

At some point their honesty and my belief system intersect and....maybe something doesn't have to give.  Maybe people can be filed in my heart correctly, despite the honesty I value so much...maybe too much.

I'm not saying honesty is always manipulation when someone admits to cheating, being married, etc.  I'm saying....typically....what someone is doing when we meet them is what they'll be doing in relationship with us.  Not everyone requires monogamy either.

No judgment about that, only my own need for clarity and preference for honesty, no matter what that is. 

I can respect honesty without rewarding it with trust.  I can appreciate honesty without extending vulnerability.  I can hear someone's truth without judging it, even if it goes against my world views. 

What you build with new friends can take shapes and forms you aren't familiar with.  You can say NO and mean it, defend it and not listen to wrangling and reasons to change your hard NO, rather than waste time and energy giving attention to someone trying to change your mind.

You deserve respect for your honesty too.  You deserve to be accepted for who you are, just as you extend that to others, IME.

I guess that's important to remember....
You're not an apple on a tree to be picked by a man.  My mother said that to me while I wrestled with dating a divorcing man during my own divorce.....B.

Looking back, my B was right....it was OK to date and move forward with plans and connection.....even if it was complicated.  It was also amazing and rare and worth investing in.....in that case.

No connection with other is worth dishonoring connection with self, IME. 

You posted about keeping imagination out of relationship....and I agree that's good to be mindful of.

Enjoying music and friend connection with a new person sounds fun and reciprocal with this person, right now. 

I don't imagine all connection has to be between single people.  As long as everyone has a realistic view of what's happening, or not happening.....connection can be many very good different things, imo.

Maybe you have a new best friend in this person? Maybe this person offers the chance to learn hard lessons that expand your vision and understanding? Maybe there will be romance? 

Whatever happens, be honest
with
yourself.  That's the most important connection.

Good on' ya, Hops, for seeking out more if what you want.

Lighter
P.S.  I'm pecking out posts with one finger.  No time to edit.















Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 14, 2020, 03:09:59 PM
Thank you, Lighter.
That was a wonderful, comprehensive response with many wise remarks in it. I really appreciate it. Especially:

Quote
regretting the time I wasted waiting for the divorce to be final

Quote
are honest to the point I over value their honesty and become.....
I have to watch my codependent tendencies

Quote
what someone is doing when we meet them is what they'll be doing in relationship with us.  Not everyone requires monogamy....

[I definitely do. I've required it of myself for decades now, and also require it of any new partner. I'm too old to and have no desire to play games OR to offer myself up for unnecessary hurt. Also have a hard rule that I have zero right to ever again be an undermining factor in another woman's marriage, no matter what her man might say about her. Been there, done that 20 years ago. It was wrong then and I believe it would be wrong again. I never had a single doubt about M in that regard, nor myself. With someone new? Either we work together to reach a goal of committed monogamy, or we don't. Clarity.]

....and the most significant for me:

Quote
I can respect honesty without rewarding it with trust.  I can appreciate honesty without extending vulnerability.


The last one matters most to me because it returns squarely to making a CHOICE. Returning the responsibility for my experience to me, where it belongs. Good warning and well put.

I'm going to just wait and see if he follows up about the meet in a couple weeks. If he doesn't I won't mind and if he does, I'll get myself really clear before, during and after. Firm friend zone is the most likely outcome.

Thanks again!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on September 14, 2020, 03:34:54 PM
I highly recommend the "friend zone" for a time, Hops... given some details about his situation. To start with for a few months at least. You can reassess the potential for "friends with benefits" level later. And think about how risky it might be to invest emotionally with him... perhaps he'll talk about how his current situation is for him, emotionally and that would give you a good insight into what his relationship style is... before you move into one with him. If he's already brought that situation up, then I would consider it fair game to inquire more about it. Full disclosure and all that.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on September 14, 2020, 04:58:58 PM
You're welcome, Hopsy.

Whatever happens, find the joy in it. 

I trust you'll figure this out and continue connecting with others too.

You aren't married.  Go ahead.... Chat your heart out!

You just might find the guy who moves your floor AND gives you all the space you require.  The guy who shares your humor and cares about your day.

BTW autonomy and independence are normal and human and not aberrant things, IME. 

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 15, 2020, 06:00:02 PM
"...moves your floor" is a great image, but the one that melts my heart is "shares your humor and cares about your day..." is even better!

I find this expert really absorbing. So smart and articulates things so fluidly. Also just good to listen to:

Dr. Ramani Durvasula (particularly her medcircle.com series on narcissism). She spots the specific thing about someone not asking questions...
Here's one example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ska9CXcuI8 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ska9CXcuI8)

Fwiw...

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 27, 2020, 01:40:50 AM
Local Zoom quirky guy ended our last Zoom yak with an invite to come sit in his yard, which I happily accepted. He lives 5 minutes from me, a block from the house I grew up in. VERY familiar area.

I'm looking forward to that. He might possibly become a "pod friend" since he seems responsible/serious about Covid. Sure could make winter more fun, and I hope I find another woman or man friend who might be able to meet my paranoid standards.

Meanwhile, to avoid being invited to his house, I sent M a very short email asking if he'd like to meet at a close-in winery on Oct. 10th, which I'd enjoy if he's up for it. Glad I did that and we'll see what happens.

Meanwhile also, I have a LOT going on suddenly around church things...signed up for two workshops (everything's still online) and have had some good correspondence with folks. Friends are also doing a distanced outdoor 80th bday celebration for a woman in my Covenant Group. We're wobbly about attending as it could be up to 20 people but I know that property and there's loads of room to spread out. Will decide later.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on September 27, 2020, 11:45:05 PM
All that new connection and it's fall!

I just love fall; )

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 28, 2020, 08:06:27 AM
Had a fun actual date yesterday out in a small town in/beside the mountains, which is sorta halfway between his town and mine. Storyteller man is bright, energetic, creative and quite the talker. I think he's craving attention and a partner. So far he doesn't communicate much (email, calls) so I'll wait and see. But we had a good time together. He wanted to hug me when we parted and it was my first non-M hug in a long time. I felt clunky about it (as well as mushy, physically--Covid gain).

We first agreed to meet at a popular brewery (again in mtns) and yikes, it was PACKED with younguns (most in masks) for Octoberfest...so we agreed to go down the road, found a quiet restaurant with a spacious open tent and ate there and drank a couple beers. Yakkity yak. It was really a nice diversion in a nice place.

He'd definitely be a compatible friend and I hope to hear from him again. If not, god bless, on to the next, keep the line moving!

My backyard date with Quirk is this Saturday afternoon. Super casual, will be more of us talking but in the other's presence. We'll be 8 feet apart so can shed masks. I'm going to bring my own drink and snack so no contact, etc. Such a weird time. I know he's enjoying getting to know me, and likewise. Though what now look like quirks might be too much for a more serious relationship. (He has no car and goes everywhere by bike or bus, but isn't taking the bus now due to Covid. So for him to come to my place I'll need to fetch him--he said he'd sit in the back seat, wear two masks, and we could leave the windows open. That sounded considerate and safe, I think; he's just five minutes away.)

But I've got to keep an eye on my renewed eagerness to mingle because the fall surge in cases marches on. The students are back in town with predictable results. Many locals are pissed at the Univ. for re-opening. But that's for the other thread.

Haven't heard a reply from M yet and am curious. If he says Yes I'll be happy to see him. If he says No in a way I'll be happy for him; it'll mean he's taking care of himself by recognizing he's not able to make the shift. I'm pretty sure I can but wouldn't want to at his expense.

That's my R-report!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on September 28, 2020, 09:10:28 AM
That sounds great, Hops, what a nice afternoon!  Is Quirk that one that you just got chatting to online and wasn't one you were expecting to be anything other than a friend?  Just want to make sure I've got things straight in my head.

It's difficult, but as this illness is likely to be with us for a long time yet, I think there needs to be a balance between risk of the virus and risk of everything else from not seeing anyone, no physical contact and so on.  It sounds to me like safe, distanced, masked up get togethers are a good balance between the two.  Nothing will be risk free but then of course, nothing is anyway.  Numbers here are high, it seems, although fatality rates much, much lower (it seems cancer has taken the top spot back now).  So I think you're sensible to do safe dates and it sounds lovely that you had a nice time - it's just nice having something to plan for, if nothing else.  Yay! xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 28, 2020, 03:25:59 PM
Thanks, ((((Tupp)))). I've been having fun!

Quirk is the Zoom-buddy I met on a neighborhood website, and we've been having lively long conversations every week or so. He's odd (as am I in my way), generally introverted, super bright and a great conversationalist. I enjoy him. Friend zone so far and that's fine with me. He's been widowed 2 years but still clearly affected and I'm sure we're both lonesome. We connect well and communicate well so it's just a happy connection. No fantasies so far but one never knows. I doubt we'd make great mates as he often has a "critical spirit" approach to other people he tells me about (which I think is just compensation for some social awkwardness).

Storyteller is the actual-date guy from a town 45 minutes away. Lots in common (he gets my having taught poetry in schools off a federal grant). He's a musician, very creative and made an actual career out of radio and music things. Fun to be with and talk to, but not super "present" except for his enjoyment of a delighted listener. Likely just friends and that's just fine by me. Hope I'll see him again. No angst about it.

M hasn't responded yet to my invite to meet for our plan to have a conversation in early October. That's notable because he was such a ready and prolific emailer. So he's dealing with his own feelings. I imagine he might NOT be able to be friends after all and if that's the case I understand entirely and hope he decides what's right for him.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 28, 2020, 04:00:20 PM
PS - M did reply he's "more than up for it." He lost a long-time best friend, in SF. So he's wracked with sadness about it which I totally understand. I'm glad we'll meet.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on September 28, 2020, 09:30:32 PM
Hops:

I hope you have a happy visit with M.  That would be a small bit of redemption for him to sit and be lively for a visit.

I won't even mention him falling short....you ignore it or leave.  Easy.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 29, 2020, 03:39:47 AM
I hope it's happy too but already am pinging to his tone:
Yes, the 10th! I'll be out of jail!

"Jail" being his description of my boundary, the silent period I needed before we talked about whether we each want to stay friends.

Kind of flip; doesn't suggest he's been doing anything new about therapy, I'm guessing. I hope he stayed with it. I will just expect him to be who he always is, and continue to not be his "girlfriend or fiance." I think I'll just listen, be kind, and be more detached. And see if I can enjoy him as a friend. If he's always going to be snarky or do little digs in my direction, that's going to cool my interest. Hope he won't but not expecting a new restraint.

hugs
Hops

I took the time seriously; sounds like he hasn't. I will just have to observe how he acts toward me and how I feel about it, and whether he tries to push me back into his comforting routines.

hugs
Hops

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on September 29, 2020, 03:50:16 AM
Ah, Hops, yes, I see what you mean about M's tone but you're right - if it's possible for you to have a platonic relationship, have the odd meal, a nice walk sometimes, that would be great.  I'm just hoping he's not spent this time thinking you'd see the error of your ways while you were apart ;)  Lol, that won't be a conversation that ends well!  I hope he's able to just enjoy your company and take it for what it is.

Quirk and Storyteller both sound nice and I think your approach to just enjoying the time and not putting pressure or expectation there is sound.  So much other uncertainty at the minute that at least having some fun dates to look forward to helps keep things on a bit more of an even keel xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on September 29, 2020, 10:35:31 AM
M told you who he is, Hops.  I wouldn't hope further than that, for sure.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 29, 2020, 12:55:04 PM
Tupp, you're right about the two new males I've met. Quirk seems like someone who wouldn't toy with another person's heart or situation. Storyteller seems more flighty but is charming and creative. I have already been hearing from Quirk fairly regularly, nicely spaced (slow) contacts. He is feeling like a likely friend already. Storyteller doesn't get in touch and so far doesn't connect very consciously, so I'll enjoy him if I feel like it if he gets in touch again. I don't want to do pursuit though. (He may be dating around like mad, just gives off a restless vibe.)

Thanks, Lighter. Your grounding reminders are helpful.

Our meetup will be a good opportunity to internally reinforce my decision. (It's actually solid--I'm not doubting it.) But I'm looking forward to finding out if I/we can have cake (fun company now and then) and eat it too (without harm to either).

Hopefully it'll be a happy catchup of friends who can adjust together to the change.
Maybe, it'll be a small-flags reminder of a wise choice made or even a recognition of necessity for a permanent end to contact. (I'm curious as to whether he's continuing T.)
 
IF simple friendship with occasional meets works for us both, cool.
If it's not feeling like that's possible for me for any reason, I'll back away again. Although we've both offered to help the other in an emergency in future, "being friends" beyond that is open to individual interpretation. Will be curious what M's notion of that is. Mine is: nothing ritual or assumed about the other's time or attention, occasional invites, whatever. Perhaps some "podding" during winter if that feels mellow (a movie, escaping to each other's homes during housecleaning). But NOT, if it doesn't. I'm continuing to seek out new companionship regardless.

For me this meet isn't a "oh whew, now we resume with a few minor modifications" but a chance to talk over things and be honest about what we each are capable of, and not, and whether we each want to "try" committed friendship. He will likely be on autopilot, so relieved that he's not thinking. Remember when he wrote, "Don't be so serious"? That suggests to me it'd be quite difficult to get him to focus on making our communication go well or be more meaningful than me listening to his woes for two hours. But that won't halt my own focus (self-care and growth). Getting into his work is his choice, not mine. M ain't my project. I am my project! :)

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 04, 2020, 06:25:36 PM
Spent two hours today yakking with Quirk in his weedy back yard; had fun talking with him as always. Can't imagine romantic feelings for him but I'm really valuing his friendship. He's kind and eccentric and his house looks neglected and woebegone. Could be his widowhood or how he actually interacts with his surroundings. He's so passionate about each green thing he said, "I love weeds."

I am fetching him in a couple weeks to come here for a patio sit, and am very happy to have him as a friend. He's clearly sooo isolated that he's pleased about it too.

Not a peep from Storyteller for over a week since we met (I had decided that since I'd reached out more than he did I'd hold my water and wait). I wrote him a very kind, simple message saying how much I'd enjoyed it and realizing it was a one-time thing I'm still delighted we met. And thanks and all good things to him, etc. Felt good. It is just a "conscious behavior practice" for me, because I find ghosting or silence hurtful, so regardless of what anybody else chooses to do, that's not what I do. I'm pleased with what I said and do wish him well. No grief.

All is well in Hops land. I am not alone in this universe. Close poet friend came as usual and we had a lovely visit, talking about joy in color and her paint-my-rooms fantasies. Peaceful and fun on the patio during a GLORIOUSLY beautiful afternoon.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on October 05, 2020, 01:15:36 PM
Quirky sounds nice, Hops, and male company sans concerns re marriage/relationship/house etc could be a really nice way to pass the upcoming lockdown winter.

I'm slightly disappointed to read that ghosting occurs at any age!  Kind of think it's the thing people should grow out of by the time they're about 19.  Good that you took the initiative to draw a line on it.  A date of any kind needs some sort of close, I feel, it's just polite to say "it was nice to meet you" if nothing else.  I'm glad all is well in the land of Hops :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 10, 2020, 05:56:24 PM
Well, M and I had our promised "early October catch up" meet.

It was a relaxed and so pleasant several hours. We'd really
missed each other. Same kinda thing--he talked about himself
for a solid 30 minutes+ before he caught it and asked
me, what about you? (He had a looooong list of what he'd
accomplished, academically. But nothing about self-
exploration or insight, which I didn't really expect.)
That said, I have so much affection for him (and vice
versa) that it was very poignant to hug him again.

He kept saying, I'm FINE! I'm GREAT! etc. So I said,
wow, I was really grieving. Just being moi. Toward the
end he hinted a little bit more that the breakup was hard.

I think he still holds a half-lit torch but he seems to have
accepted that there's no guarantee. Lord knows how well
he's understood my decision...at one point (without anger)
he used "unconscionable" as one adjective for me blindsiding
him at a therapy appt with my decision. I said, you know why
I did that with our T? He had no idea. I said, it was the only way
I thought I could tell you without being interrupted. "Oh" he said.

Anyway it was GREAT to see him. And when I mentioned I
knew I didn't want daily emails and calls, he said "You contact
me" and I said okay. At one point when I was describing meeting
friends he said, oh thought you meant you were "back on the internet"
and I said "no comment" and he realized I might be dating again. So
that may cool his ardor. I don't know.

Anyway, it was great to see him, bottom line. He is who he is.

I was tense before meeting him but as usual we drank a lot of
wine so I really did enjoy him. Shame it takes mild inebriation
to relax around him. There were some great dogs at the winery.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on October 11, 2020, 07:50:08 AM
I'm glad it went well, Hops, and it will be nice if you can add someone else to your safe pod to get through the winter - a couple of hours here and there to catch up, without pressure or drama, will be good, I think.  I'm glad you had a good time xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on October 11, 2020, 09:16:03 AM
So.... a little closure to that episode Hops? Permission to move on and live your life, finishing grieving at your own pace? Until you're ready to take another chance?
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 11, 2020, 10:16:43 AM
Thanks, Tupp. I hope it might be, but I am not sure about the "safe" part. He looks at me as the one that got away; I look at him as the one I got away from. Yet for me there's still pain around the loss of him and the dream of having a loving partner. I'll have to sit with things a while more before I really know.

He was so not-tuned-in to anything much deeper about himself or how things went, far as I could tell. I didn't ask, but hope he's still talking to a T. I think he's avoiding pain by not going there, but he's also blocking intimacy. He can whirr on the surface indefinitely and that's depressing for me. (Then again, I might be a drag with my predeliction for probing my own and others' innards.)

Amber, you're right. I am still grieving some over M. Last night it was hard to wind down and I felt both sorrow and some anxiety. So I think doing nothing is the right thing. (I am finding nobody on the online site so have a feeling I'll be alone a lot longer.) I worry a little that I'll start missing him even more, slippery slope, etc. Who knows. He's pretty special (just ask him! LOL) and it might be that he'd open up more in time. Maybe I'll wait a month and invite him over to sit around the fire pit. Or maybe I won't.

I need to take it gently or gently set it down. It'll help to talk to my T Wednesday.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on October 11, 2020, 10:56:51 AM
I get what you're saying, Hops, I meant safe as in 'virus safe' (as you said M was taking precautions and being very careful).  Were you thinking about a relationship with him again?  I'm not sure if I got the wrong end of the stick as I thought it was a 'company only' situation but does he think you're getting back together?  It was from you saying he looked at you like the one that got away.  I might have got this all muddled lol, I'm listening to too many podcasts and confusing myself with things :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 11, 2020, 11:25:52 AM
No, you're not muddled, Tupp! It's just a bit of a muddling situation, to try to forge a non-romantic friendship when our plans were once so big and the feelings so intense. The idea of being friends is both enticing and comforting, and also painful. Because my guess is time with him as "just friends" would amount to more of him absorbing my care and listening, and me staring at the loss of my dream of a fully shared life while knowing he can't really connect with me on a deeper level.

As the virus alone, he'd be a great "pod partner." (He was not only masked but GLOVED at the winery! I persuaded him that hand sanitizer was a reasonable substitute.) I just don't know yet how it would affect me to keep hanging out with him. I'll have to sit with this for a while, and talk to my T, to sort out how emotionally risky it is.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on October 11, 2020, 11:42:09 AM
Okay, I get it now, I wasn't sure if I was getting my wires crossed.  Yes, I understand.  I had a 'one that got away' years ago.  We stayed friends, I still adored him and hoped we'd get back together but I found it very difficult not to keep thinking about how it might have been and the fact that he didn't feel the same.  It's tough and I do think the current Covid thing makes it tougher - it's just harder when you can't get out and about to take your mind off things (or meet new people more easily).  At least you know yourself you can hold back, think about it, talk it through with the T (and here!) and not put yourself in harm's way xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on October 11, 2020, 05:36:32 PM
Hops, I think your awareness of a past tendency to slip back into relationship with anyone; with M, when it's not going to be any different, is proof to yourself - that this isn't likely anymore. Some people just don't WANT to change, and all we can do is wish them well and take care of ourselves by giving explicit permission to feel love again... under different circumstances.

You could even put in your profile, that you're looking for a high level of giving/receiving of care for each other, without it sounding like too high a bar. (You'd probably find better words than that, and I'll support it!)
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 11, 2020, 05:56:32 PM
I like that, ((((Amber))).

Somehow wording something about this in a dating profile.
I will ponder! Thanks.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 11, 2020, 08:26:09 PM
Quote
....tendency to slip back into relationship with anyone; with M, when it's not going to be any different, is proof to yourself - that this isn't likely anymore

PS Not entirely sure whether this is defensive or accurate, but I don't think the first part, slipping back into "relationship with anyone" is quite true. I've never been that desperate and have broken up with several people without second thoughts.

I think you're RIGHT that this one isn't likely any more. It's just a bit more difficult to let go of M entirely because he did make his way into my heart (despite all my complaints here). And THAT said, I'm calm again. Passed the test of an initial exploratory meet. I may try another outdoor meet (say, by my new fire pit) in a month. Just to see if it's more comfortable (the aftermath) after that one.

Meanwhile, still checking dating online and doing due diligence there.

Very much looking forward to my T appt on Wednesday. I wonder if I'll wind up still her client in my 90s. Fine with me!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 20, 2020, 12:57:22 PM
Predictably, I'm struggling again a little. Not too much for sanity, just....

Visited M to return something and then once again because I was in the neighborhood (and because he'd injured his knee).

We had squabbled over email once, as I was as usual drilling into feelings and he was as usual saying "Don't wanna!". Before I left he'd called me "too introspective" (which I don't regret) and also "too self absorbed" -- which stung because I think it's true.

Anyway, came home feeling really sad and realizing that I do miss his company and also that nothing has changed. So although I still have a little hope for friendship, I'm not sure it'll work out.

I don't have to know a final outcome this minute. But it's just painful. For him too I'm sure, although he won't acknowledge anything.

I was thinking his love of talking is really limited to a few subjects: himself, academics, history and sometimes politics. He really does NOT want to explore the self (feelings, history, layers). And I can't help it, but I do.

I want a real and not-shallow connection with a loving partner. He wants to avoid all exploration of the heart (and I get it, because that's scary and painful).

Anyway, just a discouraging episode in the attempt to make a friendship.

I know y'all will counsel me to let him leave my life entirely. I'm just not completely ready to, or just finding it a struggle with isolation and pandemic and more months alone in this building....

But I do know that's the likely outcome.

In the good-news department, I'm not giving up, still open to dating (though pickings are SLIM online, maybe also because of the pandemic), and not withdrawing from anything social. Still maintaining outdoor visits with friends old and new while I can. So it'll be okay and we'll all crawl through it.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on October 20, 2020, 01:51:35 PM
Hops, I've got friends from childhood (and a couple of ex boyfriends) that I have nothing in common with any more.  Zilch, zero, less than nothing, absolutely no common ground.  But because, once upon a time, they were hugely important to me and I loved spending time with them, and I have some great memories, I still check in on them from time to time, face to face (pre pandemic) or on the phone.  An hour's enough; by the time we've done catch up chit chat we've nothing else to talk about and I definitely wouldn't talk to any of them the way I do to you guys on here.  But I still want some connection with them, because it was just there once and it didn't go away completely.  So I don't think there's anything wrong with you and M having a coffee/chat about a book/what did you think about the news re such and such and him being that kind of friend.  I think maybe if you're able to accept that he won't be someone you talk to about feelings - but could be someone you talk to about other stuff, for a limited time so his endless monologues don't melt your ears - then maybe you could have that kind of friendship.  Maybe more like a book club friend than a best friend.  Especially over pandemic time as you know he's taking precautions as seriously as you.  Maybe you can just enjoy the bits about him that you do like and almost think about time with him being like watching something you like on TV or listen to on the radio?  Just a nice way to pass a bit of time and you can just go home if he starts going on too much.  And quite possibly if he annoys you a few more times the desire to spend time with him will pass on its own anyway.  I think it's alright to just take the bits that work for you and not worry too much about anything else xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 20, 2020, 07:05:13 PM
Thank you, (((Tupp))).

This is my challenge.

if you're able to accept that he won't be someone you talk to about feelings - but could be someone you talk to about other stuff, for a limited time (http://if you're able to accept that he won't be someone you talk to about feelings - but could be someone you talk to about other stuff, for a limited time)

Funny how when you hit 70 it seems like a more weighty evaluation! Like, how many more chances will I have before I dissolve into a solitary puddle of aloneness like other oldsters (family free) who live alone? And like, should I ignore the hurtful deafness and just stay connected because superficial social sharing is still possible? I need to suck it up and get on with positive things.

I just think this is my personal growth challenge right now and I can embrace it for good or ill, and begin to better understand what it means to say goodbye, close a door, etc. Or whether compromises and half measures make sense.

I'm happy I'm talking to my T tomorrow. And y'all here, ALWAYS.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on October 21, 2020, 02:15:47 AM
I hear ya, Hopsie!  I do get it.  I've don't make a big effort with a lot of people because I've found that  most people I know vanish when we're having a crisis, and/or make zero effort to stay in touch.  It bothers me; I'd rather have good, strong, meaningful connections than put energy into superficial sociability.  You'll know which option makes more sense for you - the odd chat that you know won't meet all of your needs, but might meet some (especially as pandemic has reduced options all round) - or that may be more energy than it's worth and M becomes someone on the Christmas card list.  And you know, I don't think you have to make a firm choice necessarily - if a chat with M takes your mind off being alone for a bit perhaps just for now, it's worth the time.  But maybe feeling low after you see him means it's too much to cope with as there are fewer ways to alleviate that just now.

I do understand your feelings about being alone for good.  I'm not fifty yet but the lack of family, friends, partner, pension and so on whirs around in my head so I can only imagine that becomes more pressing as we go forward.  It's harder just now as making new connections is even more difficult and of course, a situation like this brings being alone into sharp focus.  Not much else to focus on at the minute.  But your decisions are always good ones so I don't think it's something you need to reach a conclusion on quickly.  You can take your time; your boundaries are good, you know you make the best choices for you.  One thing that does spring to mind is that I know I've had relationships in the past - romantic and friendship wise - where I've been more in love with how I think it could be than the reality of the person in front of me, if that makes any sense? xx xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 21, 2020, 09:36:18 AM
Makes perfect sense, Tupp.

I know I felt sick last night, as though I'd lost my dignity by wobbling and it was humiliating in a way. I left it that he can contact me if he'd like to come by sometime and we'd see. Sensing my vulnerability he immediately was all gracious. I'm unsure what I'm doing so I'll work hard to sort it out with T today.

A bit of more clear news. Another N, who was a "friend" back when I found this house--an architect/developer guy who was really massively N and went to my church....anyway, he made me a host of promises back then about work connections and supervising/checking on my renovations and I treated both like a lifeline. Turned out it was all talk, he went off on a business trip and never followed through with either. I was very hurt and angry.

He wrote me the other day that he'd dreamed about me and wanted to know if he could make amends and we could be friends again. I said of course I forgave you, then set up a Zoom date...but then reconsidered and yesterday wrote him I'd thought it over and realized it wasn't a good time for me to do that, emotional plate full.

It was difficult because I AM lonely, and he is eager. But I think I've saved myself unease and who knows what by not telling myself I can "handle" N-people.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on October 21, 2020, 09:56:45 AM
Well done on popping the N ex friend back in his box, Hopsie.  Sometimes it's best just to not go back down that road.  It's good that he's realised he did something wrong but yep, looking out for number one is very essential, even more so at the minute than at other times.

I do think you're being too hard on yourself where M is concerned, though.  It's not undignified to desire company, comfort, conversation, a nice meal!  And there was a lot about M that was good and enjoyable so having a notion that being friends together might be possible isn't at all ridiculous.  It does sound like it might be too difficult to do the friends thing but there's nothing at all wrong with trying it or wanting to have him in your life in some way - or in just checking in on him when you feel like it.  It doesn't have to be anything, he can just be someone in your periphery.  I think the current situation is making everything harder so I think being nice to yourself about where M does or doesn't fit into your life is essential right now (and hopefully T will say something similar). xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on October 21, 2020, 01:00:09 PM
Well, I'm sure you'll unpack all this better with your T Hops.

I do hear ya about the aging... in my case, I'm second-guessing my plan to only keep those strong connections maintained in my life. The idea of having a larger group is more attractive than it used to be; more a community. Activities that I can participate in - or not - as I want to. Yes, it's helpful to have Hol and her retinue around. Often, I end up just feeling like the "Mom"... and not just one of a group of people hanging out. It's a bit easier when it's just "all girlz".

My "isolation" isn't going to go away with Covid. It's a fact of life, living here. Most of the time, that's still how I prefer it. But I think the closer we get to winter, the more I'm going to approach the neighbors on my road. Most won't shut the door in my face, if I have fresh-baked goodies in my hands. ;) I've finally met them all - and while we mostly keep to ourselves, we're all involved in keeping the road passable throughout the year and helping out on the odd thing that might come up. A tree that needs cut up for instance.

Eh, but that's not what resonated from your post Hops. I definitely hear the tangled feelings involved and the not wanting to walk away from any possible connection. As if it always means the closing of the door is forever. Does it really HAVE to be forever? Like N friend - who realized an apology was in order; maybe the N-force isn't as strong in him as it appeared back then... if he realizes an apology is in order. Maybe he DOES have an ulterior motive, too. But unless we take the chance of interacting in those situations and trust ourselves to discern better; communicate more clearly; and be strong enough to be a little vulnerable than we might have in the past... we won't know. (Sorry; professorial we again...)

Is that what one SHOULD do? Who's checking our performance? Giving us a grade? What really is one risking? Even if ultimately, it turns out to be a disappointment or waste of time??

These are all rhetorical questions; I ask them of myself too. The older I get, the more I feel that I've earned the permission to just fly by the seat o' my pants - and if I get burned or hurt - well, so what? It's no different than living life at 20, when we THINK we know everything - and then life teaches us, uh..... no, smartypants, you DON'T know everything. Living requires a lot more than just self-protection and boundaries. As Mike said once, fences need to have gates in them.

Maybe I'll find I can't STAND one of my neighbors, but I'll never know unless I take the initiative to get to know them better. It's not like I'm going to tell them my life's story all at once, from the get-go. Does it feel natural to this content introvert? Oh hell no... but then, do I want to consign myself only to the relative safety of my comfort zone or can I do something that just doesn't come natural to me - but feels right?

And all of that might just be irrelevant to you Hops. You simply might not have had enough healing time and don't feel ready yet. That's perfectly valid. Healing doesn't have to equal isolation or cocooning ALL the time. There are other ways. Only you can know what's the right thing at the right time for you. Just make sure you're not imiting your options or your self as you're about to come up for air from the past year. That one still shows up to remind me, too sometimes.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 31, 2020, 06:40:58 AM
Tupp, thank you -- a lot -- for your consistent understanding about the web of attachment, how it's made up of a lot of mixed feelings and not black and white. You're right, and you've always been sensitive to keeping open to the possibility of good things happening--or even just the possibility of a good way of framing things to recognize what was also good, even in an overall disappointment. Even in a situation that was painful and hard to resolve. I really appreciate that, because in the case of M, it's been hard to just view it all as either "on" or "off."

We're not robots, and the truth is, in companionship with M I had in addition to seriously too much chronic stress and frustration because of our personality incompatibilities and how they impacted me--I had consistent (persistent!) company and attachment that was the most reliable I'd experienced with a man/partner in over 20 years. Just for a year and a half, but after all those years on my own, that was quite an accomplishment. I am still sorry we couldn't find a breakthrough.

I noticed your thoughts about possibly leaving a gate open in the fence regarding the Narchitect ex-friend, Amber. Took me a while to circle back and think over that decision again, poke it a bit.

I come back to thinking that to respect my original boundary about him is wise for me. I remember how utterly clear it was at the time I decided. He was/is uber-powerful as a persona, and constantly in court suing or being sued. Everybody from his ex-wife to business partners. Everything he talked about regarding his businesses was about other people being horrible to him (always the victim) and when he talked about dreaming up new deals or big sums there was a gleam in his eyes I found repellent. Also a LOT of vengefulness toward past associates (he'd light up most when he described defeating someone in some way). He loved the combat side of big money and I recoiled from that part of him. None of that had anything to do with his promises to me, but it was part of his character that affected trust. Recently, despite his eloquent message, his complete vagueness about what he'd done in our friendship was off-putting too. As though that had been someone else he vaguely knew rather than himself. He made no meaningful connection between words he'd said (fulsome paragraphs of promises, not a brief mention he could've forgotten) and their impact on me. Made a few remarks about not remembering. Wasn't important enough to think about, evidently, when he had another millions-thing on his mind. So in this case, I think the gate should remain shut. I agree with you that forever's a heavy word, except that for me some people are toxic. In this case, seems like the word's a friend. (SocioNbro comes to mind. After our court battle, I knew I would never want to see him again. Never as in a forever choice. Zero doubt that was the right call.)

Back to M, things are currently shifted from the painful place of two weeks ago. It's an odd thing but I'm okay with it for now. It has to do with his knee. He's in a lot of pain. Our latest contact was another afternoon today where I needed to vacate my house because plumbers and contractors would be here to fix the sagging floor (too many huffing and puffing people in the house for safety, one in particular who'd likely drop his mask despite reminders--I needed to be out and stay out two hours after the last one left, per my doctor). So after a visit in a friend's yard both Pooch and I enjoyed very much--she did such a scamper--I visited him, bringing dinner.

I think because of the physical pain he's in, and because he wasn't doing a cooking performance, he was less manic and more real, nicer to be around. I was able to just set out dinner (delicious) simply, fetch things for us both. And because he's not easily mobile at the moment, he cooled his usual frantic-manic talk a bit along with having more restrained physical movements. It's sad to point out, but being forced to be physically more calm seemed to calm his talking energy too, and it was a more back-and-forth conversation thanz we normally have. He did talk most about himself, but it felt appropriate because he's working through how he'd cope with a knee surgery if they find out it's needed. Stairs, no shower on first floor, etc. It won't be fun.

He also was a bit more open emotionally, talking about how he has a cascade of dark thoughts because of the pain, which I understood (I had a similar mental parade of pessimism after the knee hairline fracture with my fall). His own isolation is getting to him, because he can't concentrate as well on his work with it hurting so much.

What I feel a little wary about but also enjoyed, was the caregiving side of the afternoon. It's such a comfortable role for me, and I actually take pleasure in serving people and bringing relief when someone's hurting or sad. We relaxed and talked about our usual stuff, politics especially, but it was the nice part we have always enjoyed together. I was happy to be experiencing that again and Pooch was over the moon to be lounging on the huge L-couch between us. She's clearly missed him.

I think in a nutshell what made my heart feel comfortable this afternoon was that M's physical pain made him somewhat emotionally more vulnerable. It just felt like the pompous controlling part of him took a break and he was relating in a more human way.

Won't last that way, I know better. But I did feel like a friend. I still am doubtful he can ever do the same for me -- nurture or tune into how I am inside. But I wasn't needing that support myself at the moment so I just enjoyed the giving side. And he seemed to appreciate it a lot. (If situations were reversed, I doubt I'd be soothed by him, so without expecting a tit for tat, I was fine just giving. For once, he let himself just receive. And that felt more balanced.)

He used to make such a production of being the big-papa paternalistic condescending person in charge of *everything*. And that drove me absolutely nuts. This time he just couldn't be, and having his favorite chicken tikki masala with some good conversation and distraction seemed to be a comfort.

Two lonely old farts. Maybe we'll be able to keep enjoying a visit or two a month or whatever, and help each other through this dark winter. Or even if not, today was nice.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on October 31, 2020, 06:54:46 AM
Maybe you'll have to chop one of M's legs off to make him more manageable, Hopsie :)  It's a shame, I guess maybe he has to put up a wall of some sort and that's where the manic, being in control stuff comes in, and maybe not so necessary when he has a mishap like this and realises he is human.  Maybe he'll notice it was nice not to rush around so much and be able to be calmer in the future.  I'm glad you had the nice dinner and you know, I think there's nothing wrong with taking care of people.  Some people are just more nurturing than others and enjoy doing it - it's just keeping the boundary in place so that it doesn't become more than that (hard for me to do!).  It is hard when you meet someone who's amazing in some ways and a nightmare in others.  You kind of need someone in between the two.  I'm glad you had M as a bolthole though, even if it was just to be out of the way while the plumbers were there (and I hope they got everything done okay?).

The N friend sounds like a good one to keep away from.  Good people only - not perfect but just not too much of anything else.  No need to add stress to your life.  There's quite enough of that about just now.  He sounds quite tiring xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 31, 2020, 08:41:37 AM
If I had been as perceptive and mature as you are about man-relationships in my 40s, Tupp, I would have been saved a Titanic load of grief.

Thank you for those thoughts. So spot on. The part-great, part-nightmare is astute. And so is the need for carefulness around my caregiving pleasures. Especially when I know it wouldn't really be reciprocal. He'd do anything dutiful needed for me I know, but if it lasted, his impatience would show. It'd bore him and boredom makes him nasty.

Your notion of removing a leg made me laugh out loud! I love your dark sense of humor.  I'm not sure it'd be as effective as your old fashioned arse-kicking, though. Next time (hope there will be one) I get another hapless geezer in my sights, I'll send him over the pond first for a thorough Tupp evaluation.

hugs
Hops

PS New smaller heater's in, which is good, but they used the new gas lines they'd extended for the huge heater so what teensy floor space used to exist is now completely gone. I will never hire them again for anything. They also bashed the big heater into my storm door frame on the way out so it's loose and couldn't block drafts. I've put in my request for them to come back and fix that. Sheesh.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on November 01, 2020, 06:38:07 AM
If I had been as perceptive and mature as you are about man-relationships in my 40s, Tupp, I would have been saved a Titanic load of grief.

Thank you for those thoughts. So spot on. The part-great, part-nightmare is astute. And so is the need for carefulness around my caregiving pleasures. Especially when I know it wouldn't really be reciprocal. He'd do anything dutiful needed for me I know, but if it lasted, his impatience would show. It'd bore him and boredom makes him nasty.

Your notion of removing a leg made me laugh out loud! I love your dark sense of humor.  I'm not sure it'd be as effective as your old fashioned arse-kicking, though. Next time (hope there will be one) I get another hapless geezer in my sights, I'll send him over the pond first for a thorough Tupp evaluation.

hugs
Hops

PS New smaller heater's in, which is good, but they used the new gas lines they'd extended for the huge heater so what teensy floor space used to exist is now completely gone. I will never hire them again for anything. They also bashed the big heater into my storm door frame on the way out so it's loose and couldn't block drafts. I've put in my request for them to come back and fix that. Sheesh.

Oh God, Hops, they sound awful, what a saga out of something that should have been (I assume) fairly simple from the outset.  I hope they come back and fix the door quickly, silly people.

I'm glad the leg removal came across as a joke!  I know my dark sense of humour doesn't always translate well on a screen, but an arse kicking is also available on demand and I would be happy to oblige :) I don't know about being perceptive and mature as I just avoid men generally but other people's situations are always easier to think about.  I do hope a good match appears for you at some point though, you have so much to give and there must be a man out there who could give and receive in return.  We just have to find the bugger!  I hope the door gets fixed soon xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 02, 2020, 01:45:13 PM
Thanks, Tupp.
Those are encouraging words!

I'm really beginning to think M and I can manage the transition to friendship.
We'll seeeeeeee, since Hops can do some denial, yes she can. But the last few days felt like some kind of a shift. I'm glad and if I'm wrong....I Shall Pivot Away again.

Meanwhile, a nice-seeming man has responded on the website, my Zoom pal is all set for a yak next week, and I've invited some neighbors to come help me try out the fire pit.

Life goes ON. (And I met M's housecleaner and am planning to hire her, since that will be a huge regular lift, as CB noted. She's not as cheap as her predecessors but she has standards that are serious. Baseboards EVERY time, kinda thing. I'm glad.)

Hugs and hope some of this sunshine today has made it across the pond.....
Hops

PS--I increased my morning SAD light session from a half hour to an hour and I like the effect!
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 02, 2020, 02:26:30 PM
(((((Amber))))),

I forgot to tell you how nice it was to read about introverted-you toting fresh-baked cookies to your 3D neighbors. I really got a thrill out of that. Of course you won't automatically find Perfect Friends there...but I feel so positive that good things will come of this eventually. Just opening up to that possibility changes your sense of being in the world....

Hope you'll keep the cookies going randomly when you feel like it. It's worth it to actually think about "community" and I feel very happy that you are placing even just-neighbors relationships on your list of things worth doing. "Relationship" covers human beings connecting with human beings, no matter what shape it takes, imo.

That's it. You just gave me a smile.

Hope you are busy being happy right now....so hope things are good with B and can't wait to hear about that relationship! (On Farm Doings, of course.)

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 19, 2020, 01:24:02 PM
Well, life is swampy. Sometimes dank and dark and other times when the light is right, remarkably beautiful.

I'm Zooming next week with Quirk and looking forward to it. I think he's becoming a friend I can let my hair down with and be pretty transparent. So eccentric that I doubt we'd ever make the switch to romance, but he does have channels I've missed (like sensitivity). Funny, smart, very verbal guy with an expressive face.

I just don't know quite how pure introverts manage it but I'm fumbling my way to some new balances with different people.

M is still in my heart and I'm working at discovering how much of him is good for me, as a friend, or not. We've had two really nice evenings in the last month and he states consistently that I am welcome at his home any time. I do enjoy the comfort and familiarity of going there. He hasn't been here since our breakup but once the house is tidy I'd be happy to have him over again sometime.

BUUUUUT. Because it was so comforting the last couple times, I began to fantasize that things might be different. Was talking with a girlfriend about how I imagine that, and how even a committed relationship might become possible again, if he would decide to see the Sikh on his own and really do some of the inner work that would help him both be more psychologically comfortable with himself, and also able to listen and respect boundaries with me. She said, well you'd have nothing to lose by asking him about it.

So I did. In a simple email I basically said that if he decided to work with Sikh on his own for several months, for a me a lot could change. That I'd offer a couple things that'd change things for me and he could do the same.

His response was: All is good, Hops. Don't imagine anything else. No self-fulfilling prophecies. I dunno what the 3rd sentence meants but sure got the "don't" part.

I found myself very very sad. Another step in letting go, re-embracing reality is my friend. But I'm struggling hard with it.

I realized too that in spite of being the one to do the breaking up, I am holding on and he is not. (Or not showing it.) One of the things narcissistic-tendency folks do, I've heard in some of the things I read or watch about it, is upon experiencing rejection, detach pretty quickly and absolutely. I told my friend I feel I've been compartmentalized--like we can be in each other's company, but he has a total grip on himself at all times and has just sealed it off. He seems genuinely comfortable just hanging out and enjoying the superficial parts of what we once had (the talk about politics and culture and his work and dinner company), but has absolutely released the shared-life dreams or any emotional intimacy part (not sure we ever really had the latter, since it'd require mutual listening). I'm still puzzling over whether how it is, is good for me or bad for me, or something in between.

And I do get it. The compartmentalizing is self-protective for M and makes sense, in a way. But given the sudden day of sadness, it's also a warning for me. My heart is sticky and stubborn. I still feel my breakup decision was correct, because he stressed me out so severely I felt I had no choice, health wise. But three months later, I'm not fully over it. I know pandemic isolation and winter coming on have something to do with it too. But some of it is just genuinely missing him, missing have a partner however problematic. It's stupid to be surprised.

We're doing Thanksgiving dinner together (fancy fish and a flick). It's my favorite holiday reduced it to its simplest: gratitude (no commercialism). When we discussed Christmas I said I imagine he'd be FaceTiming all day with folks who love him a lot, and I hoped it'd be peaceful for him and next year would be better. But didn't offer to share it with him (personally, that'd be very painful, since it's family-family-family and I'm no longer eligible for the family dreams, etc). He replied, Whatever. That doesn't cover Xmas Eve. (I heard him as being completely focused on what he wants, and not pausing to think about how I experience that holiday, due to D.)

I replied that I find the whole period difficult and would he want to be around me if I'm feeling sad? And the last time I'd said I was feeling sad he'd responded, "You have no reason to feel sad." That one doesn't validate another's feelings; feelings just are. Suggested we see how Tgiving goes before getting into Xmas.

I figured that was that and all was clear again. Both good and bad, happy and sad, but clear. (Since to me it's so clear what M wants: perky happy holiday with my company but "no imaginings.")

But then he wrote back: "Happy or sad, I am interested in being around you. Nothing more."

So that sounded almost like intimacy or connection, followed by a brick wall. So I'm confused again. I THINK he has told himself that sharing company makes sense for him, but he can absolutely "no mas" and keep his compartment from leaking.

I am not sure I know how to do that. In fact I'm pretty sure I DON'T know how to.

Do I need to go NC or cold-turkey or do you think I should hang in with this strange friendship? The fact I'm facing is, I still love this man, warts and manias and all. Yet...I don't know quite what he's doing in regard to me, emotionally. If anything.
Maybe if I hadn't had two years of nonstop "you are everything and I am so in love" from him...I wouldn't be confused now. (I recall the one evening I left his house upset after some critical remark he made and I said, your next woman will need to have thicker skin and he said "There will never be another woman!". It sounded quite real.

Is it really possible to be so totally in love as he professed to be for so long, and now be totally okay with its new shape without one hiccup? He has a vice grip on his guard and it's always up, so maybe this is just what that looks like.

Maybe I'm the one leaking. I just don't know if this is healthy and normal or a symptom of a lonely little ship steaming back toward an iceberg. (Me being ship.)

My T thinks it's okay to be vulnerable and just say how I feel whether he ever does or not. (He doesn't, any more. And he always kept up the huge wall of words so he didn't become vulnerable. Come to think of it, his love expressions were almost always in emails, not spoken when I was present.)

I have difficulty with M's charge: "Don't imagine anything else." Really. That's nearly impossible. Maybe I could just tell him that, and see if he'd be able to be more open. Or if he stays stonewalled, that might help me re-retreat.

Thoughts very very welcome. Thanks for reading all this.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 19, 2020, 03:41:26 PM
Hmmm

I think M may be comfortable with an emotionally unengaged relationship (of any kind), as long as it's intellectually stimulating and includes pleasant rituals. He did describe both wives doing fairly drastic things to get his attention.

Hmmm

I really don't know what's going on and need to get my focus back on my own responsibility and my own growth. I feel a bit destabilized by my recent emotions.

Breeeeaaaathe, etc.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on November 19, 2020, 04:16:35 PM
Aw, Hopsie.  I'm sorry.  This is tough.  My thoughts, for what they are worth:

I think M has shown you, many times, not only how he is, but also that he's unlikely to change.  I understand that there are aspects of his company that are fun and engaging.  But I don't think the two of you are well suited.  You are very emotionally astute and self aware.  You've done a huge amount of work on yourself and you know what you need in order to be happy.  I don't think M is able to give that to you.  I think he sounds like a nice guy, but I think the fact that you feel he needs to do a lot of work with a therapist in order to change his personality so that you're better suited (or even just to get him to the stage where he doesn't illicit enough stress to make you have a stroke) is a sign that this is not the right thing for you.  And it is a shame, as there are obviously some parts of him that are a good match for you.  But I think the parts that don't fit outweigh that.

I think people can fall in love in different ways.  For some it's heart and soul and takes a long time to relinquish.  For others it's more surface level, and easier to move on from.  I don't think he can be different to who he is, any more than you can.

As for going no contact - I guess the question at the moment is whether the stirring up of emotion, the questioning and wondering again what it all meant and how he feels and so on is making the isolation and general pandemic situation harder to deal with, or if the brief respites of nice meals and a pleasant evening is making it easier to manage.  I think under normal circumstances you could throw yourself into lots of social things and travel and so on, but obviously just now that isn't an option.  So I guess the decision needs to be whether seeing him from time to time is making life easier or harder overall.

I do think that seeing him is going to mean it takes longer for your broken heart to heal.  A bit like endlessly picking a scab (I'm not suggesting M is a scab but you know what I mean).  But perhaps the pandemic will be even harder to bear if you don't see him at all.  I think that's one only you can figure out the answer to (maybe with T?).

But overall, Hopsie, I think you're better off putting this to bed.  I don't think he's the right one for you and I don't think that's likely to change.  Whether you do that now or whether getting through the winter will be easier if you see him every now and again I don't know.  Sorry not to be more positive about it all xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 19, 2020, 06:09:07 PM
Thank you, (((((Tupp))))).

It's very helpful to have a view from a distance, which is way more objective than I can be easily at the moment.

I was surprised by how it all hit me again, and I do think it's related to the pandemic and winter closing in (despite fire pit!). But it's also real heart stuff.

You pose very sane questions: Is it better or worse with him. Will getting through winter (or life) be harder or easier with or without him.

The rational conclusion (he won't change, so let it go) is very easy for my brain to comprehend.

The heart stuff is harder but I am going to continue to try to balance reason and heart. I live with ambiguity in my creative life but am not sure I should in my regular life.

hugs and thanks,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 19, 2020, 09:10:09 PM
Part of what's catching up with me, I think, is that I wasn't feeling all the feelings when I broke up with M.

I bottled it, analysed it, buried it, and pressed forward without giving space for the grief.

Just now I really cried. Sob style. And realized how very long it's been since I allowed that to happen.

A relief. Called a friend who could hear it and understand it.

Now just need to be patient with my delayed reaction and understand that grief follows its own timetable and takes its own form.

Also told M in a straightfoward way (email) what the sadness is now. No expectations of a response. Still going there for Tgiving, far as I know.

I precipitated it but it's still hard. Love makes no sense so why do I still want it?

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 19, 2020, 09:39:43 PM
Oh, man.

He just responded: "It's not over, Hops. Email isn't the place to discuss...[etc.]."

How is it "not over" when you direct a poet "Do not imagine anything else" etc?

F*** me.

Halllllp!

hugs,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on November 19, 2020, 09:58:35 PM
OK. Disclaimer: I only know what I know. Might help; might not.

In every new relationship there is this kind of "in-between" fantasy and reality space. Where one is open to all the little things that evoke the hope for something solid, committed & compatible in the near future. Duration and when it shows up is different for everyone.

What you saw while in that space was initially charming and all well & good. You both learned a lot about interacting with each other; maybe you more than M. Later on, as you became more of an exclusive couple... you saw some things that you absolutely knew you weren't interested in having in your life on a regular basis.

I don't know what you "should" do now. But this current stress is why I don't usually recommend trying to maintain a "friend zone" relationship after something potentially serious and committed falls apart. He knows what buttons to push to put you on the back foot Hops; make you feel obligated to hand over the goods now that you're talking again. Pushed they are. You're finally addressing your real feelings about how/why things ended. You have real grief over real hopes for a real relationship that just didn't manifest.

But - that doesn't equate to you having the desire to walk right back into what wasn't comfortable for you when you left. Because, if he wasn't acknowledging and respecting your feelings - and trying to accommodate your wants/needs from a relationship THEN... you guys were still in that in-between place. Not quite "in love with the idea of love" or the fantasy place and not quite the real thing either. IMO, you got the short end of the stick - AND all the work trying to make it work.

That's what I see; from my spot outside it all. Could be totally off base. Just remember - whatever you choose Hops - you can take your own sweet time to be comfortable with what you want and decide to do about what you want. NO PRESSURE; no obligation; you can bow out to protect yourself or just mull it over... or just refocus on you. :P on M.

You didn't want to put yourself in a position where he didn't think it was over, remember? Well, well, well... I guess you called that correctly. Don't panic. Take your time. Get clear in yourself FIRST. Then address him.

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 19, 2020, 10:09:05 PM
THANK YOU, Amber.

More tears.

This time because of feeling so understood and supported.

Can't express at the mo' how much that means.

Much much gratitude,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on November 20, 2020, 01:52:47 AM
((((((((Hops))))))))

What Skep said.  I think he can pull your strings - unintentionally or not, I don't know, but just from your last few posts "It's not over, Hops" is a contradiction of his earlier email; "Don't imagine anything else"  and the other one where he said "Happy or sad, I'm interested in being around you.  Nothing more".  I think he showed willing, Hops, with the counseling and so on, but he is who he is.  I think maybe he can transition to friendship, maybe not so much that you can.  I think he was able to spend two years telling you he loved you because he probably did/does - but it still doesn't change who he is, or whether he can give you what you need, or be who you want/need him to be.

But I think the really important thing now is to focus on you, as Skep said.  Not deciphering his messages and trying to work out hidden meaning and so on.  I think he's been clear in his actions - deeds, not words, and all that.  What do you want now?  For yourself, as that's the only bit you can do anything about.  I think letting the grief out is absolutely the right thing to do, and maybe you hadn't before because you didn't really think it was over.  Maybe a part of you was hoping that the friendship would become a relationship without the stress, or that he'd have carried on going to therapy and you'd be working things out together.  Maybe, maybe, maybe.  Maybe have a time out now.  Don't contact him again for a bit, let yourself settle, let your own feelings come out without them being muddled by more contact with M.  I don't know when Thanksgiving is but maybe focus on yourself until then, have your dinner with him, maybe then you can chat face to face.  But please keep you at the centre of everything you do, Hopsie xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on November 20, 2020, 04:39:29 AM
I'm so sorry another layer of pain popped up, ((dear one.))

It's one thing to step back and take stock.  An entirely other thing to feel M release  hope for a loving future with you.  I think M felt he had to.....to sustain connection with you.  I think his pulling back makes it real...the death of hope.

Another layer of loss deserves to be deeply felt.  It's sad, Hops.  It could haveshouldhave been...
so good/better/enough.

How can so many amazing connections with M not be enough? 

I think M's darkness rubbed against your darkness and there's not enough compromise to fix it....and there never will be, imo. 

Not your fault, Hops. 

Not anyone's, but still....
so sad and I'm sorry you're hurting.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on November 20, 2020, 08:34:56 AM
Checking in for how things feel this morning. Did you sleep Hops?

Something us girls have talked about repeatedly and explored different aspects of it at the Farm, is what a mirage & trick it is when we are motivated to give of ourselves, be open & vulnerable & loving...

and it's not coming back to us from a partner. IME, this is one of the deepest hurts because it pricks at the childhood wounds - again.

But WHY is there an automatic expectation, that if one gives love in a relationship that it's always going to come back? Why sometimes, do some of us keep beating that dead horse, being inventive & creative, always hoping that THIS TIME - we'll be heard, felt & seen and OF COURSE that will evoke the same level of love, honesty, vulnerability & respect in response. (Not saying you did this Hops; you recognized you weren't getting an equal response and you took appropriate action. For yourself.)

Methinks this goes back to that childhood programming of parenting our parent; and being bereft in response - or worse.

I'm tossing this out - irrelevant as it is to actual circumstances right now - to help put some mileposts up; waypoints to understanding what's going on when your feeling-storm calms enough to think about it again.

You posted that last email from M, last night - same time I was typing my post. And I've got to say, that he must have sensed your emotional upheaval starting and took advantage to press again for what he wants - without regard to your comfort or state of mind*. I sure wouldn't think it was possible to be friends with someone who treated me that way; that pressure - pushing - influence - give me what I want was a theme you revisited several times over the course of your time with M. The Sikh wasn't able to enlighten him or get him to see that this wasn't a two-way street situation; he wasn't letting it be.

* This kind of thing evokes my anger and protectiveness. And I would go directly to confrontation here. Even though I'd much rather not; I'd feel I wasn't left any real choice. Because of my instinctive reaction. Which is why last night's advice to take as much time as you need - to sort this out; feel all the feelings and think all the thoughts (my alternate strategy) - makes more sense for you. You'll like yourself better doing this your own way. I'm well aware that my "let the chips fall where they may" reaction has made my own life more difficult than it has to be. But it's also kept me more safe than I would've been otherwise.

Safety has a downside too.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 20, 2020, 11:14:09 AM
Thank you ALL. So very much. Gratitude beyond my vocabulary.

Tupp, spot on as ever:
Quote
I think he can pull your strings - unintentionally or not
.

And I think you're right too that it was just a burst of avoided grief that finally got to the surface. It shocked and confused me, as I cry so seldom, but I think that's all it was. I take powerful feelings as a cue something has to change or I have to make it change and quickly, when in reality, they just mean I have to weather them. I have to be with some powerful feelings, which will pass. Thank god I have y'all to see it from a distance. Thank you so very much, Tupp.

Amber, I'm embarrassed but amused to recognize how little I've learned. DECADES ago I used to say to friends tongue-in-cheek but knowing it was true: "I can beat a dead horse into dog food." (BTW I did sleep, because I said hell with this and took an Ambien.) I think you have real and surprising perception about how M senses and reacts to bits of emotional vulnerability or information from me:

Quote
he must have sensed your emotional upheaval starting and took advantage to press again for what he wants - without regard to your comfort or state of mind*. I sure wouldn't think it was possible to be friends with someone who treated me that way; that pressure - pushing - influence - give me what I want was a theme

This is sobering and helpful, in a very big way. Thank you. I had been feeling guilty about prodding him to take up therapy again (I know the old "I can change him" delusion is useless, but my wily heart was trying to find workarounds). But the original theme won't have changed, I'm sure.

Lighter, your pure compassion came through like a ray of sunlight. Thank you. Thank you for your kindness and how you respond to pain. All with such perceptiveness:

Quote
to feel M release hope for a loving future with you. I think M felt he had to.....to sustain connection with you. I think his pulling back makes it real...the death of hope.

You're right. The whole time (decades ago) I was pining over an impossible romance I yearned after for years...that was when I came up with a ferocious commitment to "reality is my friend" as the only antidote to the emotional wreckage I'd created for myself. I remember back then also repeating to myself, "hope is my enemy." I don't mean that as a bleak outlook on life, which I generally feel is about beauty and gratitude. Just as a way to cope with love, which I'd bungled like a naked oyster on an interstate. (Or like the imprinted child parenting the parent, as Amber mentioned.)

This helped me too, the way surgery can save a life. It hurts but it's clear:
Quote
there's not enough compromise to fix it....and there never will be

I don't know why I was so thrown off. Well, I do. Two cozy peaceful evenings, a couple hugs, and a sense that I'll be alone forever...plus pandemic....plus winter closing in... I was just undone by isolation and aging and fearing, it's all lost now.

It helped that I took a walk with a friend yesterday. And I've made plans to do the same today and every day I can when the sun breaks through.

My house is a cluttered mess. I get it cleaned up and then space out for a week or so and it's suddenly a shambles. I feel shame. I wonder if any man I might meet would be so horrified by my ADD stuff that he'd reject me on that basis.

I'm still trying in the limited way one can right now. Got a response from a businessman about an hour away. Very very intelligent but perhaps conservative. Dunno yet, but it was fun emailing him. And reading his fairly astounding blog.

My closest friend here is a fantasist. She tends to encourage my hopes and make fanciful predictions about how it will go. Y'all are different, and I think the distance of being in the ether together gives you clearer sight.

The one piece I'm still chewing on is asking myself why I can't accept M exactly as he is, because it's a cardinal sin to try to change someone. When I ask myself why, I just go back to that final straw -- the night he couldn't listen to me after I asked him to 8 times in a row -- and how despairing I felt as that sank in. It's an important memory and I think it could guide me. It was real and I sensed the health consequences of him not listening. And now, his choosing no new therapy to teach him how.

It's pretty clear.

I hope if I wobble or ever come back with some other rationalization for why M and I might try again...you won't hate me for it. I'm being honest about this because I feel weak at the moment. BUT, between now and Tgiving I'm really going to try to stiffen up my resolve. Hopefully, after that, I won't succumb to the temptation to reach out to him again, or delude myself that I can handle "just friends" when such an enormous dream had to be sacrificed. I think I understand what just happened. A "curtain call" as Judith Sills terms it. Not everybody breaks up cleanly, sometimes there are revisits and retestings of limits and, unfortunately, fresh blasts of irrational hope.

I have a feeling you would care and listen either way. You're a lot more patient than I am. But if you don't want to hear more about him, please do say so. Seriously I'd rather close down this thread than risk alienating you!

For now, in this morning's return to sanity (on a beautiful blue bus driven by you all), I am clear. I will go for Tgiving as promised but do better and more conscious battle with my own escapist fantasies. Face this solo life as it is now. Do sensible things to get through winter. Work on house and health. Walk all I can. Zoom more often. Be honest with myself and speak my truth to others, even if vulnerability makes them squirm.

I love you all.

So gratefully,
Hops



Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on November 20, 2020, 11:31:55 AM
We all want to hear how you're doing, Hopsie, and there's no need to berate or admonish yourself for reaching out to him, still loving him, still wanting and hoping for him (or someone else) to be in your life - especially when there's little else positive going on just now to distract yourself with.  It's all part of being human.  None of us manages all of this without developing a few battle scars, it's life.  Some bits are great, some bits are awful, most of it's just hum drum between the two.  None of it is unacceptable - it just is what it is.  I think you can have hope for a commitment to reality.  That sits better with me than hope being the enemy.  Unfortunately the only way we can figure out if someone is right for us is to get to know them - and that can mean we fall in love with someone who isn't right for us in every way.  The difference between you and most other people, I think, is that a lot of women in your position (I don't mean that to sound unkind but I understand your concerns about spending your golden years alone and on a low income) would have gone ahead and married M, telling themselves they could cope, he would change, it would all be okay, and they'd spend the later part of their life being increasingly unhappy in a gilded cage wondering if they'd have been better off staying single.

You've been completely committed to reality all the way through.  You never hid from M's faults, or your discomfort with them, or your own needs.  You've worked, honestly and openly, for months, on him and on yourself.  It doesn't get much more real than that.  I'd also lay money that M being one of the few people who's been as cautious about the virus as you have has also made him seem more viable just now - there aren't many people you can safely hug with and we all need that.  Self love, Hopsie - no giving yourself a hard time.  Muddle through as best you can, limp through some bits, sail through others.  We're all here and we're all rooting for ya xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 20, 2020, 12:37:45 PM
[a poem by Derek Walcott]

The time will come
when, with elation
you will greet yourself arriving
at your own door, in your own mirror
and each will smile at the other's welcome,

and say, sit here. Eat.
You will love again the stranger who was your self.
Give wine. Give bread. Give back your heart
to itself, to the stranger who has loved you

all your life, whom you ignored
for another, who knows you by heart.
Take down the love letters from the bookshelf,

the photographs, the desperate notes,
peel your own image from the mirror.
Sit. Feast on your life.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 20, 2020, 01:29:14 PM
Thank you, Tupp. You are so very very sane and I hope you know how stabilizing you are. I'm wallowing around with a broken rudder and you're pointing out that I also have perfectly serviceable oars. !!!!

I was pondering what you said about "Hope is the enemy" and you're right. That's not true.

I think what I was trying to tell myself back then was more akin to "Fantasy is my enemy." I KNOW that's true, in love relationships. Because I have a Post-PhD in fantasizing (a poet/writer imagination, all very nice, but in romance it can go on steroids and be very unhealthy).

I had spent literally several years FANTASIZING about a beautiful future with the man. And belatedly, about the time Reality Friend turned up in my mind, I recognized that the writerly imagination was actually a danger in real life connections with men. Fantasy. Instead of taking in what was real and showing patience for it all to reveal itself.

M was ready to commit to everything after two months, with incredible amounts of love-hyperbole in writing that were seductive and dizzying. Plus his endless pressure. I dragged my feet throughout but wanted the fantasy, too. Eventually, my fantasies smacked into the reality of how it felt too often.

I still believe that for me as an individual, Fantasy is an enemy (in relationships). Not hope. Thanks for helping me notice that.

Sheesh. Wish I'd reminded myself of what I had once learned. But I guess some lessons, for me anyway, one has to learn more than once.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on November 20, 2020, 02:09:34 PM
OH PUH-LEASE Hops...

we all have our moments. And there is stuff you're working through that is deeply thoughtful and intensely emotional. No JUDGEMENT about anything from us. You don't need to apologize. When each of us has had those "falling apart" moments you've been there. Just returning the love.   ;)

After all, even Amazons can make the same mistake more than once. I know I have. We can at the very least support each other when someone else is going through it.

Now - the fantasy doesn't need to be set out on trash day, IMO. It's a healthy piece of our psyche; it's where we DREAM. If we couldn't imagine the fairy tale coming true; would any of us dare risk another relationship? I don't think we'd be eager about it. Knowing the different taste, feel & smells of fantasy versus reality is an acquired skill that is perishable if we have no vital reason for practicing it. And being "out of the game" for an extended length of time - we forget things; aren't as fluent. (Reminding: how much I've second guessed my own feelings for B. Is it real or is it memorex?) Isolation really doesn't help.

The feelings will pass. It's gonna be OK Hops. You're still our dear poet and dreamer. You still have a really keen sense of discernment and reality. This is just a stumble. We got you.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 20, 2020, 02:20:54 PM
Once again, Amber...
you've made me cry.

In a GOOD way.

Thank you, kind friend.

Sniffing, going to fetch a glass of wine because it's five o'clock somewhere......

grateful hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on November 20, 2020, 04:12:12 PM
Hops:

You owe us nothing, and yourself everything.  There are no SHOULDs or absolutes to tend to on our account.  We'll be here, with our truth and cyber tea, as needed, for you.

Everything is information and lessons and growth, at least for someone as earnest as you, always  stretching and seeking to see yourself honestly.  Maybe your childhood script stops you seeing others with such rigor.

But acceptance...really sinking into it, sometimes changes perspectives, ime.  Creates serenity. 
Opens other possibilities we couldn't see before, ime.  Not necessarily with M, but perhaps in spite of him.

Be curious at Thanksgiving.  And fearless.  SEE with eyes unclouded by emotion.

Widen your gaze.  See the field and remember....
You are the field.

And eat your face off, of course; )

Lighter




Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 20, 2020, 04:17:11 PM
Face is already half off, Lighter! LOL.
Hence the need to double up on walks-taking.

Thanks for this very excellent advice.
I will do my very best to tap into that reality-based behavior.

No fantasizing. Brain in gear. Detachment. Observation.
Information gathering. Accepting what is. No fantafoodle.

IcandoitIcandoit....
(and I suddenly have a date with Bidnessman. Surprising.)

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on November 20, 2020, 07:30:31 PM
OOOOoooo a date might just help shake the collywobbles, Hops.

Hugs, m'dear. Wine is not my thing; I was thinking of something a tad stronger for me. Business stuff is throwing me for a loop again. I need to not think about it while Freddy is growling at the squeeky little pest, Stinker. I need to get him his yarn ball.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 20, 2020, 08:07:07 PM
Dang. Ready to hear it when you are.

So speaking of relationships, sounds like
Stinkerbell and Freddy need counseling.

Wonder what cat-couple-counseling would
look like? A lot of hissing, fur standin up,
not much cuddling?

Or maybe they'll surprise you with Purrs 'R Us.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on November 20, 2020, 08:57:13 PM
Lots of growling & hissing & swatting... as Freddy teaches the little one to respect his elders. Purrr old guy, he looks at me so exasperated sometimes - right before cries or knocks on the door to be let out.

Stinker is starting to calm down... a little. Now if I could only convince him not to lick my face and wake me at 2:30 am........ Freddy's outside tent isn't big enough for the two of us. LOLOLOL.

Meh on business stuff right now. It's not pleasant; it's after hours; and I still am in a holding pattern while I decide how much I have to do.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on November 21, 2020, 12:22:28 PM
Thank you, Tupp. You are so very very sane and I hope you know how stabilizing you are. I'm wallowing around with a broken rudder and you're pointing out that I also have perfectly serviceable oars. !!!!

I was pondering what you said about "Hope is the enemy" and you're right. That's not true.

I think what I was trying to tell myself back then was more akin to "Fantasy is my enemy." I KNOW that's true, in love relationships. Because I have a Post-PhD in fantasizing (a poet/writer imagination, all very nice, but in romance it can go on steroids and be very unhealthy).

I had spent literally several years FANTASIZING about a beautiful future with the man. And belatedly, about the time Reality Friend turned up in my mind, I recognized that the writerly imagination was actually a danger in real life connections with men. Fantasy. Instead of taking in what was real and showing patience for it all to reveal itself.

M was ready to commit to everything after two months, with incredible amounts of love-hyperbole in writing that were seductive and dizzying. Plus his endless pressure. I dragged my feet throughout but wanted the fantasy, too. Eventually, my fantasies smacked into the reality of how it felt too often.

I still believe that for me as an individual, Fantasy is an enemy (in relationships). Not hope. Thanks for helping me notice that.

Sheesh. Wish I'd reminded myself of what I had once learned. But I guess some lessons, for me anyway, one has to learn more than once.

hugs
Hops

Hopsie, I've had a fantasy life running in my head ever since I was a little girl, about everything.  I think fantasy is something we can control and such a nice alternative to reality, which is often messy and confusing.  I have done the 'this is it, he's the one, oh my god I love him thing' with so many guys now, even without meeting them - just seeing a picture on a dating site can be enough.  And when Covid kicked off, I found myself contacting not one, not two, but three ex boyfriends, the story in my head being 'we got together again during the lockdown and even though we couldn't see each other we realised we still loved each other'.  They all ignored me, obviously, they always do after an initial polite reply but I think it can be a knee jerk thing when stressed or anxious (for me, at any rate).  So I do understand the fantasy thing.

I do feel I've got to the point where I can be more realistic and practical, though.  The mum I went walking with - she's nice but nothing more than that has come into my head yet.  I enjoyed the morning with her, would like to do it again but if not, it won't feel like a big rejection.  In the past it would have done and I'd have wondered what I did wrong and if I'd offended her and all sorts of things.  You know how it is.

With regards to Ms eagerness to commit so quickly - I was perplexed by the abrupt ending of a relationship, many moons ago, by a man who'd fallen head over heels for me as soon as we met (according to him) and who'd been very attentive and had driven many miles each week to spend time with me.  Comments were made about moving in together, never met someone who gets me like you do, can't believe I've been lucky enough to meet you, etc etc.  Three months of whirlwind relationship and he vanished, leaving only a very lengthy text message in which he listed all of my faults and annoying habits.  A male friend simply said to me that any guy who enters your life very quickly and dramatically is likely to leave in the same way and it's stuck with me ever since.  I keep it in my head now, and I've noticed with me it's the same with friends as well - the ones who tend to leave me in the lurch when things get tough are the same ones that initially do the reaching out and wanting to get together in the friendships.  It's weird, I don't know why people do it, but anyway, I keep it in mind now (by way of tempering my fantasies!).  All of that is really just saying "I hear ya" and you know, I don't think you need to analyse yourself in all of this.  I think perhaps you and M are just not a good long term match and it's not because either one of you did something wrong or has some sort of flaw, you just maybe don't have enough things in common (or enough of the most important things) to make it work long term.  I'm not sure if that makes sense, I'm tired and my brain feels wobbly lol xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on November 21, 2020, 03:49:48 PM
Non-sequitor comment.

Other people fantasize too. Maybe even more than I do. Some people don't know the difference between a fantasy and believing they can make it come true -- as if the other person involved doesn't have any thoughts, feelings or life outside of person A's fantasy. LOLOL.

It's not really funny; I see this a lot more than I used to. But I've learned that my fantasies are just that; when they come up I let them play out... and then take from it, what I "hear" in it that might be a clue to what I really desire. And then I push the off button and go back to dealing with reality again. Filing away what the fantasy might be telling me about my wants (and sometimes needs) for future reference.

In my case, I think my experience is weighted a lot more heavily toward the less pleasant things or work toward a result. So when I'm experiencing happy feelings, it's easy to let the fantasy machine wind up a new reel of images & sensations... letting the imagination build a whole world and life that only exists there. Eventually my inner critic chimes in - "AHEM!" and the dream bubble bursts and I get regrounded in my real life again. Or I'll start being self-conscious and feeling silly.

But I can't stress enough that there are clues to parts of ourselves embedded in those fantasies that can be REAL useful.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 21, 2020, 05:32:43 PM
Y'all are so normal.
And you understand entirely.

I don't mean to do some absolute thing about what fantasy means...it's just something I realized that, for me individually, was like a team of Clydesdales taking off with the beer wagon, never to be seen on this planet again.

OUT of control, in other words. So though daydreaming and fantasizing is fun, in my case it really can be delusional or dangerous to my well being.

Oddly, M just called me, all perky, just wanting to "catch up" -- and then talked about himself when I had nothing much to say. He hasn't called me in many months (our only connection was infrequent email), so maybe he's acting out his new "It's not over" declaration.

I just stayed neutral and let him ramble on and confirmed I'd be there Tgiving, and thanks very much for the cleaner referral. Dull stuff. On purpose.

I have zero idea what he's really thinking personally but actually think y'all pretty much understand both him and me. (As in, he must be driving toward what he wants again...and from your perception, Amber, it's just what M does.)

I'm calm today though I turned down a couple friendvites because I don't know how to not talk about something that's top of mind and painful if I'm with someone I'm close to, and that just gets me upset all over again. I need to let it rest a bit. I have clarity now and Lighter's charge to stay objective is very important.

So to keep the distress in calm mode (much of which was actually already relieved by my meltdown and crying the other day) I'm watching dumb diverting flicks, eating, and hoping to tidy the house tomorrow. It may be lazy but feels like what I needed.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on November 22, 2020, 02:12:44 AM
Not lazy, Hops - self care :)  And as for tidying house - when I suffered very badly from depression and found even getting out of bed difficult, a therapist suggested I try to do something for ten minutes.  Not think about the whole job or the rest of the day, just set the timer for ten minutes and do what can be done in that time.  Whether that works with or against ADD I don't know but I thought I would mention just in case (obviously feel free to ignore :) ).

And I'm sorry to say I suspect M feels more comfortable when you are feeling vulnerable and/or not in control of the way that you feel.  I think you are right to focus on you, not him or what he is thinking/feeling just now.  Thanksgiving - yes.  Cleaner recommendation - yes.  But other than that - duvet - Pooch - TV remote.  I think that's what the doctor would order just now xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on November 22, 2020, 09:00:51 AM
Yes yes yes, what Amber said, Hops.

Remember not to make bargains with yourself about taking, and feeling entitled to downtime.  Get every drop of self care from it.  Guilt sucketh the care and joy you might otherwise receive, more fully.... with greater benefit....

You know what I'm trying to say; )

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on November 22, 2020, 09:23:41 AM
Guilt indeed sucketh all positivity out of life. Yet, I am aware of the reflex (especially for women) that when we end a relationship because it's not JUST not working for us - but is actually harming us - there's an outpouring of apologies, peace offerings of the "friend zone", and even casting ourselves into a negative light as "less than" and "not up to the task"... all to excuse and not wound the male ego. And that might be some programmed maternal instinct that gets all twisted up into something unrecognizable in romantic relationships.

Maybe it helps to take the male/female roles and "shoulds" out of the picture when thinking about things. If a girlfriend had treated you that way -- would you still feel obligated to offer them "something" as a "consolation prize"?

Sorry, if you're just done thinking about this for now, Hops. My fascination with the study of relationships might be counterproductive for you just now. (Those thoughts/observations keep evolving, so they'll be here if you want to return to it. I too, can beat dead horses.) I just had one of those intuitive flashes that you just don't have the energy right now to "think"; it's still too personal and triggering; and Tupp is right - you just need whatever works for you as comfort and self-care.

Make yourself a yummy, nutritious soup or stew today Hops. Weather is turning chillier and the sky is gloomy. Time for silly comedy movies, or maybe some epic adventure flick. Maybe Indiana Jones type? Or maybe watch something that was your favorite tv series way back when?? Roy Rogers for instance... just let yourself rest and your emotions rebalance... tomorrow is another day.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 22, 2020, 10:30:57 AM
Amber, how could you. Roy Rogers instead of Hopalong Cassidy?
Now I'm really upset. LOL.

Seriously, please don't do the I'm thinking something but not going to tell you thing. Every single time you make observations about mine or share things you've learned about your relationships I benefit from it, I truly do. Don't hold back!

I thought what you wrote about what women often do at the end of or during the decline of relationships was powerful. Read-again-and-ponder, powerful. Thank you. Something I wondered about. When you previously wrote that you might feel inclined to confrontation in a similar situation, did you mean verbally confront someone with exactly what you think they are doing, or with what you are feeling?

And Tupp, spot on again with this. Of course I can't prove it, and very likely it's entirely unconscious rather than Machiavellian on his part:
Quote
I suspect M feels more comfortable when you are feeling vulnerable and/or not in control
. I think it's be pretty natural for someone who only feels safe when he is in control, to start interacting more happily when the other is not.

Lighter, I'm going to need to concentrate to keep up the internal power and distance but I'm willing to try. It's difficult. Would be so nice if I could just safely pour out all the stuff. But I'll be calm and I hope in control of myself by Thurs.

Meanwhile, alla youse--thanks for the self-care reminders. Even tidying up can be part of that, because it does make me feel much much better. Not to mention it lifts self esteem because the old shame-tape can't get quite as loud. The normal thing I feel when I let it all get out of hand is global self-shaming. I know, I know!

Huge hugs,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on November 22, 2020, 04:41:41 PM
Nope; not holding anything back Hops. But I do appreciate you might just need some time not pondering this topic; doing something else that might be a lot more fun. Or comforting. Or confidence-boosting. Or whatever!

Lemmee go see what I said about confrontation... ah, there it is.

My irish/scot/viking gets up in a BIG way these days, when I've already made myself as clear as clear can be... and then someone decides to tromp heavily right through what was meant to be taken as a boundary. The "look" comes over my face - my next words aren't going to be nice or diplomatic; typically this is the last warning for someone to back off... and if they persist, I will continue escalating anger and "command voice" until they back off, leave or I make them. ESPECIALLY when I've already expressed feeling vulnerable & triggered by something. I can back down again if the "look" elicits a quick - "my bad" or similar acknowledgement of their own behavior. But once I've gone to expressing myself, it's harder to shut down.

Oddly enough, it's not the Alpha-male types who push me to that place. It's usually the ones proclaiming their acceptance of feminism - as if that's their free ticket to just crash right in where they were told they didn't belong and didn't have a right to be. Maturity doesn't always coincide with age, I find.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 22, 2020, 05:01:09 PM
Whooo! You ARE an Amazon, Amber. (But I knew that.)
Many kudos for your clarity and confidence, which I will shortly be trying to channel.

Thanks. I understand what you're describing.

Meanwhile, one of my pleasant self-care distractions is trying to figure out how to design this to fit on a nice purple cushion:

Quote
...when we end a relationship because it's not JUST not working for us - but is actually harming us - there's an outpouring of apologies, peace offerings of the "friend zone", and even casting ourselves into a negative light as "less than" and "not up to the task"... all to excuse and not wound the male ego. And that might be some programmed maternal instinct that gets all twisted up into something unrecognizable in romantic relationships.

I'm really pretty dazzled by this observation of yours; happily chewing on it.

I feel much better today. Still phlegmatic but don't care. Been watching "Alex Rider" on Amazon Prime which is a sort of James-Bondish series featuring an intelligent, precocious teenager, not a caricature. I'm finding the acting, writing and his character much more interesting than the old school Bond stuff and it's very diverting. The other teen characters as well.

Must hie me into a life that includes some teenagers. They're quite wonderful.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on November 23, 2020, 08:50:34 AM
Well, young people and sharing with them, hearing their struggles IS quite educational. That was the secret to teaching - students always taught me as much as I claimed to teach them. Thing is the age group of "kids" I'm around the most now are late 30s, early 40s... with a few 50s thrown in. LOLOLOLOL. But it's been really creative and productive and positive for us to share back & forth on "life stuff".

That bit of paragraph you quoted, is the distillation of YEARS of conversation with Hol about just that very thing. Over & over & over. Maybe I ought to see if I still have any calligraphy chops... and frame it for her. A pillow makes sense too. Only Hol and I would be tempted to beat ourselves in the head with the pillow everytime we caught ourselves "doing it again". Or maybe throw it at each other. LOLOL. At which point, we'd both break down in a bad case of the giggles.

Not saying I didn't have my own run-ins with it; I did - but for the most part when I ended a relationship or it was ended FOR me, my trajectory was a solo run into a new iteration of my life. Flee, in other words. I see that struggle to maintain some kind of connection as a "fight" response. (Explaining that point of view, is complicated; has to do with power struggles.)
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 23, 2020, 10:33:15 AM
Quote
I see that struggle to maintain some kind of connection as a "fight" response. (Explaining that point of view, is complicated; has to do with power struggles.

And when you're in the mode and mood, I would love to hear the explanation. Something went "ping" when I read it but I don't know why.

Thanks for sharing your thinking, Amber. It's really valuable.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 23, 2020, 11:13:45 AM
I keep starting down the path of castigating myself for having had a meltdown last week, but if I'm fair (friend-ly) to myself, what it really amounted to was a few days of strong feelings and some vulnerability and retreat.

And now I feel myself on the way to the climb out. Some things I have done, baby steps, to improve my mental state and create positivity even with winter coming:

--finally got through to M's housecleaner, agreed on a price (oof) and booked her for twice a month. No longer sure I'll feel comfortable hanging out at M's "pod place" so the "what to do with myself other than drive around" for five hours is a dilemma. He works in his study every morning and though I prefer afternoons, she is only free in the mornings. And she is the only one I am certain will wear the mask while working, as she does at M's. So...long story short, after Tgiving I'll see how I feel about it and decide what to do then.

If anybody has ideas on places one can go to sit outside during winter...I will take Pooch and can always delight her with a series of bundled-up walks in new places, cold weather or not. But I really don't have the energy these days to walk for five hours or another place to go that's virus-safe besides M's. (Cleaner takes 2-3, and doctor said stay out 2 more after she leaves house.)

M will be pleased to have me come there I think. The only way I can continue to have a pod place is to go there twice a month in the mornings this winter. I can work on paperwork and be separate from him (he'll only come out of his study to grab coffee) in the dining room/LR area, and bring a book. I would just do a couple hours there I think and try to drive around the rest of the time. It's just a weird, weird thing. I am aware of one dog-friendly restaurant with a semi-outdoor patio with big heaters, so I could try to wind up there around lunchtime for the last two hours before I go home. There will be people in masks, but decent good air circulation and well spaced tables.

Ideally (this is so disjointed) I'd feel generally better if I can plan things for those cleaner mornings that do NOT involve any dependence on M's hospitality. If I can carefully plan a list of dog-walks plus errands that are as safe as I can figure out, plus perhaps a long drive to a country town to meet a friend for an outside lunch (that won't be possible all winter)...I'll do the best I can to minimize M-time.

What I had otherwise been thinking was that depending on how I feel seeing him after Tgiving, if I re-wobble it might be better for me to withdraw entirely from contact with him. Not out of anger or anything, just to get myself a good distance from the dream-dregs until I'm positive I'm in an entirely new phase of how I view the relationship (dependent on the kind of objectivity Lighter describes that I'm not skilled at). I was shocked by how wrong I was last week about having gotten all the way to the other side.

But if I CAN maintain my own center, I should not be emotionally hobbled by that sort of contact. Especially during mornings. It's the go-for-wine-and-dinner-coziness that was pretty undermining I think. Nothing was wrong with all the feelings that bubbled up. I don't feel them now. I think it was grief residue that I had sealed off and avoided, and it just came up and out.

I feel lighter and calmer because it did. If seeing him now and then as "pod refuge from housecleaning plumes" I still feel that way, it'll be okay. Just yakking my way through it here.

Hmmm. One last thought. M has a whole first floor near-apartment, basement  area, that is literally unused. He comes through occasionally to fetch a book from the stacks or wine from the wine room, but wouldn't be doing that often at all in the mornings. That would feel less connected and also be a space in his home that doesn't have all the associations from the previous rituals we shared. I think when I go I'll ask if he'd mind if I worked down there (paperwork in a big tote.) It'd help I think.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on November 23, 2020, 12:52:55 PM
Can Pooch be left in the car for any length of time, Hops?  I'm just wondering whether any museums or galleries might be open and manageable enough with distance and masks.  Or if she can't stay in the car maybe you could leave her at M's after a walk and you head off to a gallery or something for a couple of hours if you don't have enough paperwork to do to keep you busy?  It is a tricky one with everything being so difficult to manage at the moment.  Or drive 90 minutes - walk Pooch one hour (too much?) - picnic lunch in car - 90 minutes drive back?  Is that too much driving?  Maybe you can do one morning at M's the next out and about or something?  It does sound tricky logistically.  Pesky virus.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 23, 2020, 01:46:22 PM
Thanks, Tupp, those are great proposals! I probably wouldn't do the gallery thing as I'm avoiding enclosed spaces and most such are closed around here anyway. But longer drives and picnic in car...those all sound smart to me. (Pooch would survive some in-car time, but I probably wouldn't do that since I won't be going indoors. The restaurant I mentioned allows dogs in that semi-shielded propane-heated almost-open-sided patio with plastic drape not-completely-closed walls. It's drafty which is good.)

In a way, those mornings are opportunities to:
--work with my body to get moving and active, which I avoid especially mornings
--develop thus better sleep routine
--get creative to figure out new places to drive to and walk in (finding horses or cows to feed carrots to brings me joy always, loads of pastures around here). If I could find an open-ended BARN that would allow a visitor, I'd be in heaven.
--find friends also interested in new walks, lunch picnics or somehow-safe non-indoor places

I'll weather it! And if it's super-difficult, tell cleaner we're going to have to do just once a month until warm weather returns. That's another option.

Thanks for the ideas!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on November 24, 2020, 09:03:58 AM
OK - I'll give this a shot. Most of what I've thought about in conjunction with this "friend after romantic relationship" thing comes from observing Hol's tribulations in this. That may NOT however, apply to you. So maybe grist for the mill, while sorting out your own feelings about this? Mind you, this is all speculative - because many combinations of "relationship" at different levels can be possible between two people - depending on the people & circumstances. Of that, I'm certain. Does it happen? Not that often.

In Hol's age cohort the "friends with benefits" phenom is quite common, but they didn't invent it. I'm not sure we did either - but we were no stranger to it either.

I have watched her multiple times, try to maintain some kind of friend contact - with her ex-husband (went OK; but only a decade after they divorced); a couple of other relationships; then this last long-term one. The last one - let's call it the MB decade - she fought tooth & nail and was party to wearing her self-esteem down to get him to acknowledge that what she felt, thought, said and wanted was just as important in the relationship as his wishes. The  last half of their time together was full of heated arguments & hurt feelings on a regular basis. It was exceedly tedious and painful to witness for me. Just make a decision already! LOLOL.

Then it dawned on me that it was a power struggle. That what she wanted was for him to participate, engage, with the situation between them... and she was determined to stick out the suffering even though her feelings for him were pretty much nil at that point; she was miserable - even tells the story to this day that she had to repeat to herself "I'm good at my job" on the drive to work because MB would discount how difficult her work was. This youngish woman has always had a healthy ego... and been extremly strong emotionally and in her self-value. She knows she's capable, competent, independent and effectively compassionate. But she was on the edge of losing that, especially the last year.

Her relief when he finally decided to break up was just as intense. She took the road trip, with Knuckles, to re-discover what it felt like to just be her again... and while the trip was longer than initially planned, she did accomplish what she set out to do. About 2 months. But then ensued the campaign to try to maintain friendship. Of course, there were loose ends to tie up on the business side of spending a decade with someone.

Over the course of 3 years, talking about this - it still comes up for her, intensely emotional at times - she's been able to say that she is trying to "win". To wheedle, cajole, reason, find just the right metaphor or analogy - to make him see that she wasn't a bad person just because she was DIFFERENT from him, and felt/thought things different than he did. She made gestures; left messages; even visited him to pick up/move stuff with the current BF - who was engaged with on a mutually respectful level, but not HER.

MB had even gone to far as to concoct a total fantasy of how evil she was to MB during the relationship and tried to shop that to her friends -- who'd been "in the loop" of her confidence all along. When confronted on it - he simply slunk away. But Hol wouldn't give up trying... hoping... that some day, some how he would "see the light" and there could be a full debriefing of what happened, apologies on both sides, shake hands and know the other wasn't seen as a villain.

That was the stakes in the power struggle. Ultimately, she did NOT win that time. But she fought and in some ways still struggles for a way to fight longer - because the reality of her, then & now - is not what he thinks or manufactured a fantasy of what it is. Somehow - her self-image is tied to succeeding in that struggle.

So that's how I understand fighting to maintain a friendship after a romantic relationship. It's foreign to me; especially how it's important to her to "win" in this struggle.

More later; gotta go.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on November 24, 2020, 10:04:28 AM
My "fleeing" response - whether with a new relationship or solo - was simply that there was no point for me whatsoever, that I needed anything from that former partner in the way of respect or kindness and so I "ran fast & far"; reinventing myself as part of that process.

I think in my case, I let myself be too defined by the partner in relationships too. Such that each time I moved on; I was able to grab just a little bit of me again - before I repeated the error. Still don't know what I was trying to work out; since I'm not doing that anymore - not sure it matters, now, to dissect it. It was one of the dumb things I did trying to cope with the FOO stuff.

There was only one instance where I tried to hang on to something; and I'd been flat out rejected and abandoned by a "fatal attraction" type relationship. It had lasted about 3 years or so - but we were distinctly incompatible on some serious points that couldn't be overcome. So I fell into the whole distraught, pleading, "I can't live without you" role. (Blech, btw.) For about 6 months. And I worked overtime to convince myself that was true, too.

Then Ex#2 spotted me and scooped me up. And while we got along OK for 14 years and accomplished some significant things together... it didn't end well either. I abandoned him. We spoke a couple of times, and I went back to load up a cabinet he'd bought me that I couldn't take when I moved out. Found out the new sucker (wife) had her own furniture and the association for him, with me & the cabinet meant it had to go. I had ignored what his ex-wife and friends said about him; thinking I could manage what they couldn't. Pride is a painful thing to deal with sometimes. But even though I'm in the next county from him now; I have absolutely no desire to speak with him about anything. Which seems weird - coz he is quite knowledgeable about what I'm attempting on the farm. But I have the "take that" attitude (which might be a little of the fight reflex) to do things my own way; succeed or not as I will... versus doing things his way; and the man was always so damnably right all the time. But I know it's not the ONLY way to succeed. 20 years later, I'm sure of that.

I hope some of this germinates some ideas for ya Hops. Obviously, the first quote is the easiest to remember. Being short & concise. LOLOLOL. Like I mentioned, it's a distillation of all this babble.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 24, 2020, 12:18:14 PM
I think the power struggle to be seen as one wants to see oneself absolutely applied to me...about 30 years ago. With M I've been much quicker than I was in youth to recognize deep incompatibilities and just figure it's more "he can't" than "he won't." For me, having it all sink in after a year and 5 months is speedy compared to the yearning cycles I was in during a couple relationships in my 40s that left damage in their wake that lasted for years.

I don't think M has damaged me that way. Being in that relationship has been overall good for me. It brought me out of over 20 years of only imagining myself solo -- I still wanted connection theoretically, but had no actively "coupled" experience in the world for that long. I got to find out that my rusty heart could still feel love for a partner. Ultimately, it just turned out that I can't alter the hardest aspects of his personality and (the harder part) don't need to. Want to, sure -- but that's the unwinnable power struggle. I am just not up for that much trying....it's time for the universe to offer me a little ease. If it does, lovely. If it doesn't, I can plod on working to create it within myself.

I think the only way to "win" my peace is just to do peace. To find that internal detachment Lighter talks about and practice it, any time I'm in his presence. And if that doesn't go well for me, or it seems upsetting or unreachable, then that makes him someone I should not spend much time with. Not to "wrong" M, but to right myself when I'm blown off balance.

I was talking to my T yesterday and she observed (again) that I am very sensitive. I think that's true. It's not always a good thing. Works well for poetry, but not for the prose of living. Sometimes, which Hol might have felt too, it just hurts too much not to be appreciated or valued, so one has to avoid an ungenerous spirit that's so consumed with itself it can't give you that basic behavior. Listening and respecting.

What you have with B sounds soooooooo different that way.

The man I'm meeting tomorrow described in one of his blog posts how he prefers to listen over talk. I get the feeling he's pretty nerdy. I like that. Anyway, I'm looking forward to meeting him. He's extremely intelligent, which is a draw. We already discovered some odd things in common--his deceased sister was at my small college during the exact same years I was. Her face looks familiar but I didn't know her. He wrote a very moving eulogy for her and was clearly shattered by the loss. I was touched by his capacity to appreciate her and the way he wrote about her.

And VERY oddly, his business has been a huge family company...multiple stores kind of thing. I was in the same industry, though a niche corner of it, in my last FT job with Nboss. I know a good deal about it and even attended some of the classic trade shows. Difference is, at my core it does not interest me at ALL, except for the green/sustainability niche, which his business has had nothing to do with. Different values, different goals. I imagine our tastes are super different but it's funny that there's that unusual overlap with a stranger.

We'll see. We already decided we will have plenty to talk about. It's good for me to get out and this will probably be the last "outdoor date" people could dream up anyway, before spring. So I'll enjoy it in the moment for whatever it is. He lives in another town a little over an hour away but offered to drive up.

Tgiving is my favorite holiday, with no agonizing associations. Just gratitude. I think I'm going to be able to enjoy it with M, just tapping into the gratitude and the present and peace.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on November 24, 2020, 10:42:12 PM
I think the power struggle to be seen as one wants to see oneself absolutely applied to me...about 30 years ago. With M I've been much quicker than I was in youth to recognize deep incompatibilities and just figure it's more "he can't" than "he won't." For me, having it all sink in after a year and 5 months is speedy compared to the yearning cycles I was in during a couple relationships in my 40s that left damage in their wake that lasted for years.
I think standing up for yourself, asking for what you need and, finally, willingness to do battle was part shield and part messenger limiting the time and trauma to yourself.  At least, I suspect that's a part of fewer wounds, less time invested trying when you saw only words sans action.
I don't think M has damaged me that way. Being in that relationship has been overall good for me.  I agree. It brought me out of over 20 years of only imagining myself solo -- I still wanted connection theoretically, but had no actively "coupled" experience in the world for that long. I got to find out that my rusty heart could still feel love for a partner. Ultimately, it just turned out that I can't alter the hardest aspects of his personality and (the harder part) don't need to. Want to, sure -- but that's the unwinnable power struggle. I am just not up for that much trying....it's time for the universe to offer me a little ease. If it does, lovely. If it doesn't, I can plod on working to create it within myself.

I think the only way to "win" my peace is just to do peace. To find that internal detachment Lighter talks about and practice it, any time I'm in his presence. When I think of M, I picture him reacting and reacting to his past...parents, ex wife, failures.....ego wounding he's patched over with thick, defensive walls.  He can't see or hear much past them, but he assumes and takes for granted his will is enough...wanting will carry him and you through....his will carried him into a successful career.  He doesn't understand how it's working against him in relationship with you.  His ego can't take the hit, so he flinched from self reflection and names you the problem, imo.

I also think M over values what he brings to relationship table....for many men, breadwinner is THE only job they feel obligated to fill.  Maybe M doesn't understand he's obligated to listen, share, take turns bc he doesn't understand healthy relationships.  He understands selfish nurturing baby relationship, and youre6the adoring cheerleader.  Some women are comfortable in that limited role, but they make a deal.....the happy ones find their joy elsewhere.  They aren't reactive....they go with the flow, are nice to the breadwinner and engaged happily with their own interests....at least that's what I've observed in the more successful relationships with men similar to M.
 
And if that doesn't go well for me, or it seems upsetting or unreachable, then that makes him someone I should not spend much time with. You see what's there and underneath, Hops. With curiosity, knowing you can walk anytime you want to.
 
Not to "wrong" M, but to right myself when I'm blown off balance. Getting blown off balance is opportunity to experiment....to figure out how to find your true North.

I was talking to my T yesterday and she observed (again) that I am very sensitive. I think that's true. It's not always a good thing. Works well for poetry, but not for the prose of living. Sometimes, which Hol might have felt too, it just hurts too much not to be appreciated or valued, so one has to avoid an ungenerous spirit that's so consumed with itself it can't give you that basic behavior. Listening and respecting.
Maybe one figures out how to gift oneself a generous spirit, listening and unwavering respect.  Maybe that creates enough of everything.

Enjoy your outing, Hops.  Just see what's there: )
Lighter




hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 25, 2020, 02:02:27 AM
Thanks, Lighter.
I don't think I can be completely unreactive around M, unfortunately. I know it's the detached Buddhist highly-evolved ideal, but it's just not me. I am not asking myself any more not to feel hurt when he says something cutting, or silently gasping for air when he can't listen or let me finish a sentence in his franticness. But when it happens, I feel pretty clear that I'll take better care of myself now. Not by never reacting but by noticing if it feels harmful. If it does, I can just go. I'm also not willing to fight him over what is at least part compulsion. If we're lucky, no longer imagining a lifelong relationship might free him to push less, "will" less and be more real. I don't know but I'm not driven to find out. No goals, just getting through it by being myself and speaking what's true for me. Half our trouble was that I submitted to his forcefulness by being gracious and basically, not challenging his constant interruptions or making it clear how damaging it was that he couldn't listen until it was really too late. So that would be me being more real, too, even as "just a friend." Maybe if I'd done more of that earlier, something would've been different, but I'm not sure.

As of now I'm just looking at having Tgiving with him in a gentle fashion. No idea whether any sort of real personal talk will happen, but I doubt it. I'm figuring if I can go light and easy about future contact (including perhaps hanging out in his basement when cleaner comes, which I feel guilty about since if I had other options at this point I'd probably take them), etc. -- then it might be okay.

I don't want to hurt him but that will of his you describe can be overwhelming, so if I get wind of that pressure happening again I'll be out of there. I think it'll be okay.

Thanks for caring, Lighter. You've worked hard to get my nose off the pebbles!

hugs
Hops

PS  I had a friend who was in her third, and first very happy, marriage. One day she told me they'd been driving up an ocean drive feeling very content and she tried to express an awkward confusion she'd been feeling. He (being very tuned in to her) just smiled at her and said, "It doesn't have to be hard." It hit her like a ton of bricks, made her realize she'd come to associate all relationships with deep struggle. And with him, that was just not there. They have a very good life together, sharing interests in art, a gorgeous home, lots of books and entertaining. They had some things to work out, like anyone (she was much more independent and introverted and at first experienced him as clingy (he was one of ten kids so just expected a whole lot more togetherness). But they worked through those things by communicating well and staking out the solitude times she needed and now they seem to be very happy together.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 26, 2020, 01:40:01 PM
It's ironic that I was just telling Tupp how I believe in the strength of choosing to be vulnerable. Because I'll be heading to M's in a few hours. I believe what I said, but also know that the choice should be conscious and not reactive (will be working on that today, Lighter!).

I will try to be present, floating on Tgiving gratitude, but keeping my inner temperature calmer and cooler, if not detached. I wasn't until today, but now I'm really looking forward to seeing him. If our friendship can become stable and healthful for us both, then I'll be glad of it. If it turns out it won't work out, I will be able to let it go. (Just gave him a call and he sounds relaxed, happily cooking. We chatted about how much we each enjoyed The Queen's Gambit on Neflix.)

In other news, my date with the bidnessman went fine yesterday! We spent three hours at a gorgeous winery, bundled up on a huge porch between two propane heaters. It was quite cool but not uncomfortable. He was interesting and good to talk to. Made clear he is wanting to find a real ("romantic") relationship. I'm not sure about the things-in-common department but his intelligence makes him interesting company. He's lean and wiry (a runner and fitness junkie) which I admire but also felt intimidated by (my physical flaws have been bugging me). But here's an example of how I might practice what I preach.

Should we find ourselves enjoying getting closer at some point (possible not expected), I'm going to choose that. Tell this person specifically what I feel vulnerable about, in terms of physical intimacy, and pay attention to how he responds. I'm not sure. He laughs readily, listens well and it was clear he liked me.

Like me, he was married twice (he left the first, the second left him) and had another LTR that amicably cooled off in recent years. His mother in her 90s looks incredible in a pic, which I commented on, and he laughed and said she'd had two facelifts. Whoo. Very different value system. He has a big family, big house (natch) in a smaller city an hour from here. I've been there often enough to know it's a lovely place. He's from there, and as a Jewish boy in a Southern-culture city, he must have found his niche in the business world and seems very loyal to his town and cultural and philanthropic things there. Lots to appreciate.

What I don't know, from first observation, is whether he'd be emotionally accessible. Not a red flag, he seems just to have a naturally restrained personality. I'll learn. I look forward to seeing him again...we'll devise some outdoor visit when I go there in a week or so. I shocked myself by forgetting my restrictions and giving him a hug as we said goodbye (I had my mask on but he didn't, so I kicked myself afterward). But I'll reiterate my commitment to safety before we connect again.

All is well in Hops land; I'm grateful through and through.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on November 26, 2020, 01:50:34 PM
Good to hear Hops!

I'll try to hover just behind you, over your left shoulder at Ms... in spirit... and I'll be silent unless you need me.  ;)
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 26, 2020, 02:42:08 PM
Outstanding, Amber! Your Amazon supervision and intervention will be VERY welcome!

(I picture you with a heavy cast-iron skillet in one hand and a peacock feather in the other, dispensing whatever's appropriate to either of us moment by moment...)

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on November 26, 2020, 03:24:29 PM
I am wearing warm, black-tie Jammies..... LOLOL.
And carrying tiny silver bells...
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 27, 2020, 01:08:33 AM
Hmmmm. Well, it was nice....sort of. Afterward I felt sad: not "upset" or tearful sad but just kind of "empty" sad. 

We had a tasty meal, and M enjoyed my attention to his cooking. It was delicious. We also had a wonderful wine (he shared a flash-sale wine website that was interesting). There were deer in his yard as I arrived who kind of shambled off at deliberate speed, with no urgency, when I walked fairly close. I always enjoy seeing them although I know they're really overpopulated. Same in my neighborhood.

M seemed okay if more subdued than usual. He enjoyed talking about the usual: food, politics, good TV, a bit about the family. (I changed the subject as he began rhapsodizing over the grandbaby but he didn't notice.) He talked briefly about how he should downsize at some point but would rather just leave it to the kids to deal with it all; I reminded him he can hire organizer people to help but he didn't want to think about it. Said he loves his home and I pointed out he could create a first-floor bedroom suite by adding a bathroom. He agreed. His knee is much better and he doesn't think he'll need surgery.

The only personal thing he mentioned, very briefly, was that he hadn't expected to wind up alone. He dropped that instantly and said no more; I didn't pursue it because he seemed uninterested in further sharing. He was a bit animated about the cooking and food and wine. Pooch enjoyed seeing him.

He didn't ask me any questions about myself. I had a pleasant time but the complete absence of anything personal between us and no expression of affection, delight or interest was what felt sad. I think it's natural. I had ended things and this is what the tail end of a strong attachment and shared dream feels like.

I told him once the housecleaner has been here and I'm ready to have him come indoors again (for bathroom use and also if we fixed any food) I'd like to invite him over to sit around the fire pit. He said he'd like to come. He mentioned shopping and I realized I'd misunderstood -- I thought we were doing the exact same precautions for Covid and actually he's been going to grocery stores (when they first open in the morning, a safer time) all along. I think I'd assumed things because he's not only masked but gloved every time he goes anywhere and washes hands thoroughly when he gets home. He uses a local Covid exposure tracking app that has alerted him just twice, both times at gas stations. But I was startled. Don't feel deceived, just realized I had misunderstood, I guess. He always talked about his grocery deliveries so I hadn't understood he was also shopping in person.

I thanked him for inviting me and told him I was grateful for such a lovely meal, and he deflected my expression and said, "It has nothing to do with you." I laughed but that was...odd. Felt like a true thing, and I think what he meant was, he enjoys cooking and having a dinner companion. Only like, "I need a person to cook for now and then." Kind of impersonal -- the cooking is its own self-contained pleasure for him, and to make something more complicated is enjoyable. But it has nothing to do with me, really; not any more. I think he just didn't want to feel anything particular toward me and he's succeeded in walling off further feelings or compartmentalizing it all. (Why he still wants to see me, then, I don't get. Except that he's isolated and hardly sees anyone except occasionally a colleague.)

Ooof. I'm glad it was a calm and no-tension evening but it was sad. I'm okay. I  hope he is. He emailed it was "great good fun; I enjoyed your company." He always says that. I just didn't feel it and though he seemed okay, he didn't act as though he was particularly having "fun," except when he was interacting with the food.

hugs
Hops

PS - If he had been open to personal sharing, there are things I'd have loved to ask. Such as, When you wrote me "It's not over" - what did you mean? Maybe this evening was exactly all he meant. Eat in proximity; talk about anything other than inner life. I understand there are people who can enjoy that kind of relationship, even for a lifetime. I don't think I can.

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on November 27, 2020, 04:03:22 AM
Aw, Hopsie.  I understand that sadness.  I think realising there's just nothing there (beyond the odd nice meal and a dog walk from time to time) is hard, particularly as you've had/have love for him and genuine affection and warmth, does just leave a hole where there used to be possibility and hope for a happy ending.  I think a lot of people have a 'that will do' attitude to relationships.  The fear of being alone is a very real and very strong one (as is the desire to have kids earlier in life) and I think many go into relationships that they aren't particularly happy in, because they think it will be less difficult than being alone.  Personally I don't like the idea of going for the least difficult option rather than the best one, you know?

I suspect M, as sweet and lovely as he can be, would be delighted to have you in his life permanently but would expect you to just accept him as he is and not moan about it :)  I don't mean that in an unkind way; he seems to have many lovely qualities from the things that you've written but I think you want a deeper and more open emotional connection than he is able to give.  I don't think you should settle for less than that, personally.

Maybe now it's reached its natural conclusion?  You can be on good terms, enjoy the odd evening together without an expectation beyond some chat and some nice food?  Businessman you mentioned sounds interesting to get to know.  Is Quirky still providing chat from time to time?  You might meet a footloose and fancy free dog lover when you start your further away than usual walks with Pooch when the cleaning lady starts :) I think you've done a great job of being true to yourself through all of this and checking in with yourself constantly.  It takes a lot of guts not to crumble and accept less than you really want.  You've been impeccable throughout xx

PS I have found different people have different interpretations of precautions as well.  It's easy to presume we mean the same things when we say the same words!  But people seem to have their own definitions of things and it's not easy to know whether people mean what they say xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on November 27, 2020, 10:04:45 AM
Well. Sounds like you saw what was there to see Hops. I'll bet that does kinda ring "hollow" a bit. I dunno if there's any more value in picking it apart further. Like driving past a house you used to live in. On the other hand - neither of you suffered life-changing damage or pain... and that's to your credit Hops. You were super-clear about your needs and how they weren't met.

All in all, not a bad first experience in your return to looking for a partner to share this chapter of your life. I think you can just write "the end"... and turn around, put one foot in front of the other... and walk into the future. Try again.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 27, 2020, 12:22:26 PM
Thanks, guys. You're both very wise.
I have so appreciated all the patient listening and support.

I'm catching a whiff of dead horse so I'll try harder to move forward.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on November 27, 2020, 09:22:35 PM
Hops:

I wouldn't worry about dead horses, if I could help it.

You once posted about the necessity of getting sick of being sick of dissecting a heavy emotional situation, like a breakup.

You were so kind to whomever you were posting to....maybe it was me.  I hope you slow down, stop feeling you SHOULD do anything, and bask in that warm compassion you gift to others without thought.

One more thing, there's going to be a vacuum where M's frantic need, for you, used to be.  I suspect it ties into our feelings of self worth....there's something very potent about the adoration of a wealthy, very intelligent man we like very much, butt for unhealthy attachment styles, maybe a bit on our side too if I'm being honest, and the incompatability of some pretty important core values....and.....any reciprocity - you know what I'm trying to say here.

From me to you....
You have value, no matter if a man is crowing about it or not.  I know this is truth.  I also know the empty sadness you described...quite intimately.

Trust, Hops.  You're an amazing partner and companion.  You deserve to be valued for your voice, as well as your listening skills, so say I.

There are people better suited to quietly going along, particularly if they haven't traveled much or seen a lot of the world, IME. My first husband told me flat out he was unhappy I'd traveled more than him, had more education than him, bc he preferred being guide and teacher in his relationships.

Looking back, I had the information I needed to SEE what was what.

It was acceptance I lacked, imo.

With hindsight, I see my worth was never dependent on either husband's opinion of me.

Even though that's truth, the empty sadness is still real, IME.

Be gentle with yourself, ((Hops.))  It's OK.

Lighter





Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on November 28, 2020, 04:11:19 AM
Lighter said everything far more eloquently than me, Hopsie :)  Yes to all of the above and no to dead horses.  As much time, talking and compassion as necessary is available :)  But with your heart protected so it doesn't get any more chips in it now (and I don't mean the ones you can eat!  Lol) xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on December 06, 2020, 01:08:08 AM
No particular optimism about it, but I had a second date with the bidnessman. He's nice and seems quite interested, but I don't think we're clicking. I've agreed to meet him one more time (just to see if he opens up some) and he's pleasant enough, but seemed over-focused on stuff that made me uncomfortable. Not in a threatening way, just in an inner roll-my-eyes way.

We met in an outdoor semi-open restaurant patio setting. I was tense the whole time but because of the virus, not him. A table of about 8 maskless women screeching their heads off the whole time was about 12 feet away and our server let his mask hang below his nose. (There was reasonably good air flow through gaps in the plastic curtains but it still was too enclosed for comfort.) My date was wanting to hold hands, not concerned as I was, and even asked me to kiss him when we got to my car. That nearly offended me. I had made clear how careful I intend to be.

He's nice enough but later emailed to ask if I'd eat with him in a private dining room if he reserved one because that would be safe. Not necessarily. Sent him an article from the Post about the lousy air exchange in most restaurants and declined, but finally agreed to meet one more time outdoors at a winery.

After that, I don't think I want to try dating any more until spring. It's too cold and it's stressful to try to find places that have heated outdoor seating. Plus, he made a couple requests that didn't alarm me but did annoy -- send me photos without an overcoat because that's the only way he'd seen me. That plus him asking to kiss after my stress over the virus in the restaurant made me feel he's more focused on my body than on actually getting to know me slowly. (Or everything I was signaling about the virus anxiety went unheard.)

He's a fit skinny man and I'm self-conscious about my weight, so I didn't enjoy him focusing on my body so quickly (second date). Give me a break. I think he's a good person, maybe just not my type. I have a feeling he's accustomed more to "ladies" who are always getting their hair and nails done, clothes shopping, stuff that means zip to me. When I said I hadn't been inside a business since March he said, but how do you get your hair and nails done? And his ancient mother's had two facelifts. I think we might be from different planets.

It wasn't awful but I don't think it's going to be great either. I'm glad I went IF I don't come down with Covid (he has regular exposure to family --a niece comes and stays--and goes to an office). He says he wears a mask but he was always eager to take his off.

Ai yi. It's okay though. And therapeutic to get out and do something, regardless.

More when/if there's more to describe. Just kinda grumbling. Had a good cozy day with a great companion -- Pooch.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on December 06, 2020, 04:28:51 AM
Lord, Hops, I hear ya!  It is soooo difficult right now with different people interpreting things in different ways and not knowing who is taking the same precautions that you are and who isn't.  Particularly as outdoor meeting is just uncomfortable (at best) at the moment.  I've decided not to meet with anyone other than the one mum I've been walking with as I know she's being ultra cautious as are the rest of her family.  It's tough trying to balance the need to be around people and to keep life going as best as possible without catching anything in the process (or passing it on to anyone else).  I'm sorry businessman chap doesn't seem to be shaping up to anything more your style.  In my head I always see you curled up by a fire with a romantic soul who writes poetry and plays guitar :)  I think it's the hippy in me lol.  And how do you get your hair and nails done?  Lol, I think those are the moments we realise that no, he has one idea and you have another.  I do think it's amazing that you put so much effort into your socialising and taking those moments where you can, especially at the moment when it's so hard to do.  I wish I had some pearls of wisdom or magic solutions to suggest but I'm all out :)  Other than keep being you, of course, and I hope Mr Right Enough will pop up in the not too distant future xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on December 06, 2020, 12:37:34 PM
Thanks, Tupp.

I think I have been going through a period of adjustment to the onset of winter isolation, and these dates have been a sort of last-ditch effort to connect or find some new something before the solo hibernation begins. In this instance I don't really regret it (save the scary virus risky moments which I hope don't add up to infection). Psychologically it's been okay. But rationally, after the next date, I'm suspending the cause until spring, when meeting anybody outdoors will be easy.

Meanwhile, I'm still enjoying semi-regular Zoom visits with friend Quirk, and M and I have shuffled into what for now feels like a fairly calm and (somewhat) comforting friendship. He's coming by at 4:00 today to sample the Bonfire (name of firepit model), as a friend will also arrive (she wears mask AND face shield) to borrow my mixer. I've simplified my attitude to M too. I care about him, and he only wants to talk about himself. If I don't do it often, I can enjoy listening to that now and then. He goes home happy and, with practice, I remain okay. (Letting go of fantasies about him "seeing the light" or "doing new T with Sikh" was essential and though it took me a long drawn-out fight inside myself to do that, I think I'm there. Y'all here helped me a lot, can't be more grateful!)

I don't need to freak out about dating or isolation. I'm looking forward to house and health stuff this winter and hopefully getting things clear enough domestically to begin writing again.

That's my story today and I'm sticking to it!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on December 20, 2020, 02:56:57 PM
Oy. I'm kind of hunching. Pandemic isolation is a symphony in my head.

M and I have seen each other a couple/three times a month lately. The usual: dinner, or me camping out at his place once (only "pod" virus-safe space I've got) when the cleaner came. He came once for wine-and-bonfire and relaxed and loved sitting outdoors, talking and watching the flames. I loved seeing him be less Mr. Professor Dr. King M.

Result. Nothing is different about us as individuals or our personalities. He still is who he is, though his domineering behaviors haven't been on view; he's calmer and seems soberer lately, but doesn't share (ever) about his feelings. I'm still who I am, though less reactive since our connection changed (after I "broke up" with him). I still wish we had a deeper connection, which seems to me would be dependent on him exploring interior spaces that are just too scary (or tedious, in his view). I might be wrong. Either way, I have let go of that hope.

Other result. I'm dealing with the reality that he's adapted better to the "new definition" (compartmentalized friendship, dinners, occasional company, ally-in-emergency) than I am. So, my job is to grow the hell up, re-embrace reality.

Conundrum. My heart makes a loyal beagle look faithless. I told him during that final T session: "my heart will never change toward you." And it's true. I stayed over (he'd painted "my" room my favorite color meanwhile) when my power failed and my house was freezing, and I felt for good or ill: safe, familiar, belonging. At home. Not because of the house; because of him.

After that, I missed him even more actutely. (Due to cleaner visit followed by power failure, we saw each other recently more frequently than we had been.) I had dinner there two nights ago but haven't heard from him since. Hugged him fiercely when I left, maybe that *scared him.

So, I'm trying to acknowledge all of it. Not mad at him or at myself. Just sitting with how difficult it is to suppress and move past how I feel about him (never stopped loving him) to that pragmatic, detached reality-brain. I don't think things are "all better" so I could plunge back in. I do think the fact of love is a reality too.

(I continue to hear from spring-date--the bidnessman--and Quirk. Quirk and I have a lot in common but I dunno. I do not give up on the Big Dream --with someone-- or on hoping, it's just more complicated emotionally than I've wanted to admit.

So, shit.

Just wanted to get some of it out. In my safe space. Thanks for listening. He invited me for Xmas Eve and I've accepted.

hugs
Hops (con't below)

*I emailed I'd decided he was inspired with work, had had plenty of Hops/Pooch time lately and needed a break, or had been kidnapped by Bambis. He wrote back: "Never too much Hops or Pooch time" and was all on fire about some scholarship; joyful.

Bottom line is he feels complete when doing scholarship. That's his primary joy and satisfaction. So not being in touch meant nothing about us, it just meant he was complete. So he's coming over tomorrow for soup and chill. Eager to.

It's ME. I am the one who is more dependent, and more sensitive to all the subcurrents and fears. If he knows he is loved (I think he does) he is happy so goes into full-compartment-scholar mode and a "relationship" doesn't need tending, because he's immersed in the one that matters. I caution myself: remember how desperate each of his wives sounded at various dramatic moments (one moving out while emptying the house after having also tried an unannounced facelift, clearly to freak him out and get his attention; the second otherwise-saintly-by-description having abruptly cut off his access to the internet in frustration, which totally messed him up for days with the university and made him furious); and me, the night I begged him to hear me (Rokugate) and stop giving instructions, and he literally could not stop -- remember, remember.

Ai and yi.

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on December 20, 2020, 08:15:11 PM
(((Hops)))

I hope you enjoy good food and wine during visits with M.  He's not your dream, but he's safety and companionship in the moment.

Enjoy your fancy fire pit all winter long.  Fellowship by firefight.  Pooch by your side.
Yes.

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on December 20, 2020, 11:27:19 PM
Quote
He's not your dream, but he's safety and companionship in the moment.

Well, that's really it, Lighter. That simple.

I need my mind to be simpler.

Food and wine? Yegods. Yes, I do. Mussels the other night; stuffed salmon- something another night -- he always kindly does seafood for me. On his own he eats baby animals (baaaaa, mooooo, even suckling oink---I need to not think about it). He just loves cooking, so I'm happy to leave him to it. I've even learned that letting him recite a recipe at tedious length without losing patience is a courtesy and a kindness in return. When I can't handle one more microscopic instruction about something I never intend to do (you can see him shift into lecture mode) then I just change the subject, but kindly. After all, I am enjoying bounty. And that's the price of admission, I figure. I am drawing the line at days of excited emails where he lives through the step by step anticipation of the cooking.

In that regard, I'm not his dream either.

But if I can manage a simple lentil soup, I'm determined to do that tomorrow.

Thanks for reminding me I don't need future resolution right now. I need to get through pandemic winter (and so does he). We'll see what spring brings.

hugs
Hops

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on December 21, 2020, 04:21:21 AM
I think the feelings will natural lessen, Hopsie, once the pandemic's over and you've no need for a bolt hole while someone cleans the house or such a limited number of people you can spend time with.  It's an intense period and having to hunker down alone is hard.  But I think once it's over, the day to day risk has gone (or at least reduced to no more than all the other every day risks) and you're able to get out and about normally and meet people (old and new), then I think M will take up less space in your life.  I think Lighter's right - safety and companionship through this crazy, turbulent time.  One day at a time :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on December 22, 2020, 07:56:59 AM
Hey Hops... take it easy on yourself, a minute. There is nothing wrong with trying to explore things from a different set of "rules of engagement" (military term, but also double entendre).

This is pondering season for me, as you know. And given that I'm also dealing with relationships right now too... I am pondering this "thing called love" and our ideas of it, along with the feelings, their origins, etc cerebral "disassembly, oiling the parts, and re-assembly". I don't claim to "know" anything definitively, 100% guaranteed, your money back... but in the what-if dept. or creative BS... whichever one prefers... [end preamble]

I think sometime our emotional intelligence develops & grows at a different rate than say, our perceptions and values and cognitive abilities. And when it comes around to our ideas about "love" and what that's supposed to feel like, and be in the day to day, real life manifestation... well, I think we reach back to some of our earliest "understandings" of what it's supposed to be & feel like. And there's some kind of "sanctity" (for me anyway) attached to that idea/understanding; something pure and unadulterated by changes in societal culture or anything external at all. But of course, I'm a romantic and idealist (if it needs a label)... and that conflicts quite often with my practical and pragmatic self.

One thing I became aware of in that long rip van winkle time after Mike died and I uprooted myself to go somewhere new - yet close to "home" - was that I felt it was time for me to update my ideas about love, should I ever be silly enough to entertain another relationship. What was a functional definition of that relationship when I was 16 just doesn't work for me, now that I'm 60-something. I wouldn't expect it to, either. But somehow - it hadn't seemed to have changed. I wanted to feel that thrill of butterflies... OMG, he LIKES ME... to be his "special person"... and listen to all my mental perambulations as I sorted my own self out. I wanted to look into his eyes and "get him"... and feel reasonably sure he saw and got me too. [sorry for the vague, fuzzy language - it's all I got for emotional stuff]

It kinda dawned on me, that this idea kinda matched up with what I understand enmeshment to be. At least - the FEELING - of it, if not the "rules of engagement/relationship". Simplistically,  my understanding of enmeshment = bad, but love = good caused a logical conflict here.... because in some precognitive sensory way... they both felt the same to me. (And this is leaving out the long analytical study of dysfunctional attachments from FOO) And off I went, down another rabbithole, with the dedication of a Jack Russell terrier...

So, some of the conflict is vocabulary. We just don't have a good descriptive vocabulary for emotions to draw on, I find. When Hol and I are in one of our deep conversations about this stuff - we end up making up words; smooshing things together; combining opposites even, to more accurately convey what we think we mean. The other thing going on, is that my idea of what the "ideal" love or relationship IS, hadn't grown, changed or matured over time. It was still stuck back in my youth. And since that idea came out of dysfunctional attachment - I kinda had to go back to the drawing board. Start from scratch. Redesign. That took TIME; experimentation; daydreaming; and of course, going back over my more significant historical relationships.

So, eventually - I was able to come up with some examples of things that seemed better suited to me now. And that necessitated a complete re-write of what my idea of relationship IS. What the "rules" are; what works/what doesn't - for me. What I like/don't like.

It sounds kinda like what you're into now with M, is the same sort of process - different; your own - but figuring it out. Whether we're conscious of it or not, our capacity for - our tolerance - of things changes as we mature. Things that used to drive us up a wall, maybe aren't such a big deal anymore. Or they're more intense even. I think it comes down to a choice of what we want to experience on a daily basis. Rules of engagement, in other words. The ideas of what your relationship consists of - has changed in some ways.

Why not let it be what it's going to be and simply discover how it feels along the way? Decisions often evolve out of circumstances; they don't necessarily need to be negotiated from the get-go. That helps smooth out the duality of ideas/perception and those seeds of pure emotion... lets things germinate more organically.

(I THINK; like stated in the preamble; I don't KNOW. I'm winging this, same way you are m'dear... this is just some of my pondering about things. Maybe there's something useful in it.)

ETA: edited the usual caffiene-fueled typos...
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on December 22, 2020, 09:24:38 AM
You're right, Amber. Very much so. Thank you.

I'd love to look into a loved one's eyes to know I'm "home." M avoids eye contact but less than he used to. He's always the first to break out of a (short) hug. Intimacy for me begins with a heart connection and that is built from risking sharing some vulnerability and listening.

He shares a ton of thinking about history and society. He doesn't share much feeling. He does act it out; when he said cooking is how he shows love, I believe him. So I'm getting more respectful about that. The overall thing that didn't work was, for me, his insulation from seeing me as as signficant as he was, shown in extreme difficulty in listening or showing interest in stories other than his own. His dismissiveness. His self-absorption may be involuntary. I feel more appreciative and more forgiving, though I still get anxious.

I was going to make soup for him yesterday. Got all focused on that, even made a bread I hadn't before, but as the day went on grew more tense about him coming (and to eat!) so I wound up feeling dizzy and weak, asthma kicked in, and I cancelled. What he doesn't know is the prospect of preparing food around him is miserable, because he focuses on it so intensely that I can't relax and enjoy it. Also, when I called to tell him I wasn't feeling well he listened for about a second and swiftly changed the subject to how HE was feeling, and a catalog of funny symptoms he'd just had. Sometimes it's not that he talks about himself, but the SPEED with which he yanks back the mic, that bothers me.

On my end, I'm having more trouble with loneliness, and that has probably fueled my recent burst of dependency. He talks to close family who adore him every day. I do have friends who care, but most are occupied with family. Most days one friend does call though. She is an extreme Type A who recites what she's doing or calls me to fill gaps when she's driving. It used to bug me that it seemed substance-less, but because of quarantining I've realized it isn't. There's a lot of comfort in loyalty and I've begun to express to her how grateful I am for that. All in all, though, this time of year brings out the alone-in-life feelings. I knew that. 2020 just highlighted it.

Oddly, Quirk is the one I seem to have a lot more in common with these days. We Zoom about every 8-10 days and I suggested we could do that on Christmas, even. He was pleased; he and his late wife were so involved and connected that he seems to not have many friends. He does listen beautifully. He made one joking reference to pooling our resources for a condo in Scandinavia for the warm months since we both admire their culture, and (privately) I've fantasized that maybe he is one who'd like to sell his own (much smaller) house and come build a little wing on mine, and Bob's yer uncle. I find him attractive but I'm more bourgeois than he.

Funny, that. M's waaaay too upper-class for my comfort and Q might be too on the edge!

Dunno about Bidnessman. He told me he made a pic of me his screen saver. Yikes!

I really appreciate your suggestion that I try to just let things happen and see what grows, or doesn't. That's an extremely important suggestion and when I flip it over, it also shows me the way back to living life more than worrying about life. I need to develop more inner resources and courage and strength.

I really need to do that. Live my own life, pay attention to it, care about it. I find that way too difficult. Nose in navel, mind circling. Body not feeling great. But I do know this can pass, I can get better, happier, stronger.

Having y'all to talk to when I'm wobbling is literally life saving. Thank you.

hugs,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on December 22, 2020, 12:43:38 PM
Merry Christmas, Hopsie.

I think it's not just possible - but positively interesting - to be independently strong within oneself and still be in relationship with someone. Some of the fears of rejection, abandonment, "not being good enough" go away. Look at how long you've thrived on your own; the difficulties you've survived & overcome. You ARE strong within your SELF even on those days where cocooning is the only option.

You are strong enough to be you, to love, and to be in relationship with whomever you CHOOSE - designed as suits YOU - all at the same time. And yes, you reserve the right to make your choice any which you feel like. AND change your mind, if THAT feels necessary too. At this age, neither of us needs a home - we aren't raising children (I keep reminding myself) - we don't need that particular kind of security from a relationship anymore. DARE TO WEAR PURPLE POLKA-DOTS Hops. We really don't give two hoots about societal approval either, do we?

2021: Grannies gone wild...   LOLOLOL
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Meh on December 22, 2020, 04:03:46 PM
Skep: "And off I went, down another rabbithole, with the dedication of a Jack Russell terrier..."  <  hehehehe
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on December 23, 2020, 03:28:40 PM
THANKS, Amber!
Your expression of how one can be independently strong within oneself AND do that while in a good relationship, is exactly what I am aiming for. It fired me up with new courage as I read it.

I can differ only about this bit, because although "don't need a home" is true now, it's likely not so later on, as I couldn't afford a decent assisted living situation, and don't have enough savings to cover adequate in-home help should I become frail or ill. In that sense I might indeed "need a home."

What I CAN do something about is trusting and building on emotional independence and confidence, which will make whatever the future brings much more fulfilling.

Muchas gracias for the good reminders--
Big hugs and Feliz Navidad to you and yourn!

Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on December 23, 2020, 03:45:10 PM
I would of course never be so shallow as to lurk in the Washington Post comments to see if anybody "liked" one of mine....so I just accidentally *happened* to see that 76 readers so far liked this one! (Diana Nyland wrote a lovely column about her sweet old dog.)

(And its my happiest relationship so belongs on this thread, yes it does! :)

My pooch (a shelter mix of corgi, beagle, chihuahua and question marks) is aging before my eyes. She makes me laugh every day. When she wants extra attention she stands beside me on the bed as I type away, staring at me with an urgency that burns holes in my retinas. She inches closer. Her expression is a cross between desperation, stalking wolf, and "this always works." It does. Rub-rub.

Many more ear scratches and sidestrokes to your sweet hound.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on January 21, 2021, 06:47:06 AM
How's the situation with M going Hops? Any new prospects?
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on January 21, 2021, 10:19:55 AM
Thanks for asking, Amber.

M and I have settled into a declared friendship. It includes love but my expectations and romantic hopes are removed. (I'd meant what I told him last summer; with him doing real therapy everything could change, without it my ability to commit as his life partner was over.) At moments it feels bittersweet, but mostly it feels peaceful and supportive and I'm grateful particularly now to have his company about once a week. We both acknowledge we take comfort from each other and have declared we will have each others' backs if hard times come. That's pretty much it. I figure when he becomes frail with age he'll move to California to be near his children.

Oddly, it's easier to feel the love without the pain now. He doesn't say it often but I know he loves me too. It's just too scary for him to explore why he was (during our build-a-dream days) so controlling and unable to listen. Being vulnerable to his lack of EQ was too scary to me to continue believing in a future life shared. He's more open now that there's no life change at risk (such as giving up his house to move with me). I still know that he's not where to turn when I'm in pain or vulnerable, so it's a friendship with one deep but narrow channel, and I turn elsewhere for emotional insight and understanding. Meanwhile, we still enjoy our time.

Had a good talk with my T yesterday, and identified that I want to be more intentional about the kinds of friendships I develop. I have good and loyal friends but only one who really understands me pretty deeply, and she'll be moving in a year. I tend to attract and be attracted to cerebral folks who love a lively talk about ideas, and that's wonderful -- but I also recognized that I sometimes avoid receiving love, even though it's what I yearn for. Easier to give it out than take it in. She thought that was a really important thing for us to keep talking about.

Man-wise, haven't heard more from the guy I saw before covid precautions took over, but doubt there's strong affinity there anyway. My Zoom-pal P is still faithfully turning up and we always enjoy each other. I think there's emotional affinity there, but his eccentricities are steel plated. No rush, no worry. Vaccinations and post-pandemic plans are all on hold. I check the dating site only about once and month and usually tell anybody who writes, let's see in summer.

All in all, a relief not to be involved in anything striving right now. I'm working on relationship with myself, mostly.

Invited M over to watch the inauguration and we both really appreciated having each other to comment and celebrate with. Made him a salmon salad sandwich, and my relationship with Pooch deepens with every dish she's invited to clean.

SHE is my soulmate, for fact. Delights me every single day. (Doesn't hurt to see M adoring her too and laughing at her amazing, expressive face. After you obediently scratch her chest a while and then stop, she aims her nose in the air and sits still as a sphinx. I have figured out what's she's thinking. It's either "Continue, Peasant" or possibly "Kneel!). So funny. Mostly she's a total cuddlebug.

I aspire to be the same for some lucky fella one day. Or another dog.

hugs,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on January 21, 2021, 12:00:15 PM
I guess maybe some people learn to receive love, by loving ourselves wisely. But a thought popped into my head - what if instead of "releasing the outcome" -- we have to practice "releasing the INcoming" too?  Incoming love - or attempts at same, I mean.

I'm glad you've found a comfy spot with M now. It seemed like this was going to bug you until you found a way through. And it's good to hear you're making a life that's working out for you - despite the continued weirdness we experience in life these days.

I'm still in a "wait & see" mode around here - but have been getting a lot of "little things" taken care of, that will streamline B's entry when it finally happens. (Steady progress happening; but SLOW is the adjective.) Long postponed tasks that completely fell off the list around are getting done. Purging (both Hol & I) is now a major endeavor before spring gets here. When it's time to be outside - I don't want a lot of things INSIDE tugging at me.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on January 21, 2021, 02:56:06 PM
Quote
we have to practice "releasing the INcoming" too?  Incoming love - or attempts at same

Hmm. This caught me up, Amber. In a thoughtful way. Do you mean release attempts to protect oneself? Let go of control?

M always defined love as letting him paternally control everything; you remember how fiercely I fought that.

I guess it's a balance: being aware of the quality of the incoming and calibrating one's inner gates accordingly. Maybe that's hard for me, but I can learn. Younger, I was happy to hurl myself into passionate attachments -- and over-attached. I had little sense of protecting myself and was drawn to All the Wrong Men. Now my pendulum is rusty and sticks and I'm just hoping it can learn to swing free again but in a wiser context.

Something's awry with me but I'm glad this T is hanging in, so maybe I'm getting closer to something important about releasing. I really hope so.

It's as though in spite of how often I preach "release the outcome" (and really do believe its wisdom) I'm not doing it half as well as I'd imagined. I think I've been more like "avoid the outcome entirely by not asking the universe confidently for what you want in the first place."

It's okay for me to want reciprocity, and communication, and a certain level of insight. I'm going to try on that thought for a while. I believe it, but haven't been comfortable asserting myself for my own sake. Oooo. A pattern. T thinks a big one.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on January 23, 2021, 05:06:57 AM
Thought I'd bring up a friend-relationship issue here, hoping for insights.

My closest friend, the poet, means a lot to me. She visits every week or so and I've always felt she's someone I can count on. We went for a gorgeous walk out in the mountains the other day when the cleaning person was here, and then to a brewery to sit outside and enjoy a warmer-than-usual afternoon, it was wonderful. Lately the pandemic has affected her deeply because it prevents her from seeing her child and grandchild often (they live a long distance away) and her relationship with her partner often descends into bickering she's sometimes called me in tears about. So I'm an outlet for her about those things, and she's been an outlet for me about M and about life in general. I was just telling my T how important she is, in our general session about how I need more loving support in my life.

But she does have a temper. When she's upset about the pandemic and we start exchanging facts, she used to get very irritated and start lecturing me about scientific things she'd read. I'd counter a bit (with other scientific sources) -- but what the struggle was I realized was that her intense longing for her family was prompting her to say a lot of things about how we'd "soon be back to normal" or "if you get it it won't be so bad, they'll have new treatments" and a lot of things that were more fantasy than reality based. I understood why eventually, and just stopped debating pandemic stuff, so that got better. (My approach to it is full-on accept the harsh reality, and hers is more escapist hopeful fantasies. Just different.)

I finally realized that she, like M, is also from an academic family and environment (both her parents were quite famous in their field) and that she has a way of occasionally dominating in a lecturing tone that I'm very allergic to as it feels so condescending. Hmmm. She lapses into that now and then but not all the time.

Anyway, today we were walking and I mentioned that because of the new virus variants I was just going to keep my head down but double down on my precautions, for example by double-masking and increasing my distance to eight feet. (It's a pretty wide street and I was walking well into people's yards with the dog, but she kept walking a bit closer than I was comfortable with, so I asked her if she could go out one more foot, which put her a little into the street--not the middle or anything, but a bit more.) Anyway, she got mad and said she couldn't both walk and talk and was just trying to have a conversation, so we'd have to stop talking and just walk separately.

So we did, and she told me to go ahead and I complied, and a couple times just turned back to wave at her in a friendly way. We'd agreed to meet back at the house. The last time, I was many yards ahead, and when I turned to wave she stopped about 15 YARDS back and said, "Is this far enough?"

Tonight I realized I was feeling extremely anxious about it, even though we'd still had a pleasant visit. I'd asked her to bring her own snack as I hadn't made a new food order so she had brought packages of crackers and cheese, and finally offered me some. (I usually serve her drinks and something like spanikopita, but she never offers to bring anything so occasionally I ask since I don't always add snacks to the food order.) I ate too much of her cheese and she mentioned it was usually for her lunch so I felt weird about that too.

I guess I just don't handle other people's anger or annoyance well at all. I know all this must sound petty and silly, but the ultimate result was that I got very anxious tonight. Ordered a pizza and slice of cheesecake and binged. Later had trouble breathing.

It was that one moment, when she was standing so far away and snidely asking, "Is this far enough?" It represented not only distance but loss of connection, I think, and it hurt. Tonight I realized that it was very similar to the way I'd feel when M would be angry or frustrated and verbally go after me. I feel scared in moments like that. That's the truth.

It also tells me I'm emotionally too dependent on her. And that in general, I'm scared to trust or be vulnerable, even with the people I'm closest to. (M and I are doing fine but for me, it includes a knowledge that he's not fully trustworthy if I were in pain or really vulnerable. And this is my general problem with the people I pick to be closest to, which my T and I identified last time.)

So tonight I wrote her a long email about how I have trouble with others' anger and how I know that getting angry or frustrated is fine, it's just that if she could say it directly rather than going to sarcasm or lecturing it'd be easier, and told her about that moment when she stood way back and asked that question and how it felt, etc. Also told her how important she is to me, etc.

But I didn't send it. I feel afraid to share how I really feel when she lets her temper show in that kind of verbal jabbing, and how the truth is it scares me because it affects our connection.

I really think this is about some early-life feelings of not being safe. My T brought that up last time. And if that's the case, maybe it's better for me just to work on these things with my T, rather than try to confront it or talk about it with the person who's triggered those feelings. (Because more than making a big deal out of a relatively minor moment in an overall good friendship, perhaps I'd do better just seeing it as an opportunity to get more insight working with my T.)

Hmmm. I think that's why I'm thinking this, and writing y'all in the middle of the night. This might be a deeply personal healing thing with very old roots, and not a thing I should take up with a person who maybe won't respond well without escalating (she gets into regular fights with her partner), or who just can't manage her own emotions completely anyway because of all she's coping with. I think I like that decision better, and writing it out here has already helped.

I don't want to put pressure on our friendship, because I think the pandemic restrictions make it hard enough for people to stay connected right now anyway. And on balance I'm glad she's in my life.

I think part of my worry is, does this mean I'm just too dependent? I really am rocked by it when someone I'm close to gets angry at me. I want to run away from it but also feel like a combo of persuading/explaining/clutching/persuading (won't you talk to me more nicely?). Maybe that also came out in the email draft (which years ago, I would've sent. Maybe I'm making progress.)

I'm open to considering the question, though. Send email? I'm thinking not, though I've always analysed things to death in close relationships, which must be tedious. It's anxiety, I think. Fear of abandonment. (If someone gets angry with me, I'm unsafe.) 

How LUCKY I am to have this place where I can vent it all. (I first wrote "how pathetic" here, but then erased it, then put it back to be real.) Thanks for listening.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on January 23, 2021, 06:29:22 AM
Oh, Hopsie.  I'm sorry.  People are hard, and the pandemic's making them harder, I think.  Just my very brief thoughts, but -

I wouldn't send the email.  I think everyone's so heightened at the minute, people are acting out, being irrational, being over sensitive, not being sensitive enough, etc, etc.  I don't think it's the right time to do relationships fixing stuff just now.  You could perhaps (if you meet for another walk) contact her beforehand to say, I do need the extra space, I'm concerned about the variant, is that okay or would you rather hold off/zoom/ meet outside a cafe or whatever else might be possible.  I think the hurt feelings and sarcasm can be discussed at a later date when we aren't all orbiting in various spins depending on what's happening at the time.

I don't think you're too dependent, though, far from it?  You're aware of things that bug you, which is perfectly healthy, you take your time when reacting or responding to things, you have your healthy boundaries, all of which is good, but equally at the moment I think we're all just so chuffing grateful to have anyone we can talk to or meet with in some way that the fear of upsetting the apple cart is heightened just a bit, maybe?  I don't think that makes you dependent.  You crave love, affection, companionship, intelligent conversation, emotional understanding, probably a good laugh as well, but you don't want to lose or give up parts of yourself to get that.  Perfectly normal, in my humble opinion.

The sarcastic 'is this far enough?' would have triggered me as well.  I've had several friends be quite sarcastic and uncaring about my efforts to keep son safe during this and it's cut me to the bone, I must say.  I've not questioned or lectured them on not taking precautions so I do feel a little baffled when people can't be a bit more accommodating when all you're doing is trying to keep yourself safe.  It's hard, particularly when it's so difficult to have contact with people just now anyway, but equally I think others are coping with the same stress, but in a different way.  Most of my friends have adopted a 'it's just the flu' attitude, which it may well be for them.  But it's not for everyone; some are at far more risk and you're right to keep those safety precautions in place.  I don't think it's any kind of reflection on you to react to someone doing that; it feels like a rejection (of your safety and your request) and sarcasm is quite passive aggressive - it can be funny when it's 'banter' but like that it feels nasty and it's difficult to respond to in the moment.  I know my anxiety is heightened at the moment anyway so things that might not have been an issue feel like a bigger deal just now.  I don't think your reaction was out of proportion, although I am sorry that it made you feel as unwell as it did.  I have been eating non-stop for the last couple of days, and spoiling all my efforts to lose weight and it does make you feel like you've let yourself down.  But I think we all need to cut ourselves a bit of slack just now and plod through the day as best we can.

I do think it's worth working on with T; I find it hard to trust or open up and I know enough people have attacked when I've shown weakness; it does get you down, especially when it's people you care about.  But I think you're right to work on it with her, rather than with your friend.  I'd be inclined to let it go for now, mention you need the distance before you meet next time (or suggest zoom rather than walks or whatever) and maybe you could talk about it with her further down the line when everyone's in a better frame of mind.  Just my thoughts for what they are worth, free to ignore if need be :)  Hugs, Hopsie.  I would happily walk along the other side of the street and shout through a megaphone rather than getting to close and making you feel uncomfortable :) Not a terribly private conversation, I guess, but who cares :)  Lol.

PS I just realised I missed that post you put about the comments regarding Pooch on the newspaper article.  So sweet, she is such a cutie pie xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on January 23, 2021, 08:08:11 AM
The Queen of Sarcasm will share a little secret with ya Hops... it might not've had anything to do with you at all. Your observation that people are just "full up" of dealing with life difficulties, a lot of strange new situations, etc is correct. Sarcasm is one way to vent off a little of that internal pressure that builds up over time, trying to adapt & adjust & regulate ourselves under those new circumstances. The cup runneth over - and it just spills out. If you two are close longtime friends - she might've felt comfortable & trusting enough with you, to just be what she feeling in that moment. It might not've felt that great for you in the moment - but in a warped way, it is kind of a compliment to your relationship. She might not have been angry - but rather, needed comfort, normalcy, and connection and that MIGHT have been the quickest easiest (albeit not so healthy) way of her asking for help.

There is a difference between being sensitive to emotions (everyones) and being emotionally dependent, for me.

Because of my sensory sensitivites, I can simply not "have anything left in the tank" to deal with anyone's strong emotions (at all; nevermind well). It's too much all at one time, until I am afforded the quiet continuity of my self-designed cocoon, to recover. It's real easy in that emotionally/sensorily stressed state for me to take other people's emotions personally - feeling responsible for crossing a boundary, making them angry. When it's absolutely nothing I did. I don't have to fix their emotions either; not my job. I just need to take care of myself.

Emotionally dependent, for me, would be if you accepted that treatment all the time and volunteered to keep your friend OK - fixing her feelings - for your own security; so you could be OK. (And granted - I think there's more than one way to be emotionally dependent... this is just the one that relates to this situation.)

Don't send the email. You wrote it to try to work out just what you were feeling/thinking... analyzing. Trying to understand what just happened. I think you're secure enough in you, that you don't have any real worries (actual threats) about being abandoned. But if that feels like there is something "under the surface"... definitely work it thru with T.

I'm noticing all kinds of things pushing in on people these days; it is the best of times and it is the worst of times. We're all just trying to do the best we can; but we're exhausted from it all - and the gas tank is empty. We all recharge differently but we all need to recharge.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on January 23, 2021, 01:05:42 PM
Thanks much, you two. You are so wise, and in the light of day I agree completely. Everyone is frazzled in a deep way, we're all off balance and have been under this stress for a year, the country and whole world has been suffering, and different people are going to erupt or express in different ways.

I do want to explore it all more with my T and will do that. I feel incredibly grateful that I'm able to sit and Zoom into my old old stuff, and touch on those feelings with her. Most of the time I feel as though I'm yattering a lot and fairly fast, and she expresses herself very very slowly. I struggle with adapting to her pace and I'm sure the obverse is true. On the other hand, I'm rock-certain about her integrity and compassion, and for those, I'll take momentary discomfort any time.

As to "making her angry", Amber, I don't really fear that. I've learned over time that there is a streak of buried rage in her (her own early issues, including being molested by a villager when very young, while they lived in Africa for her parents' research) and just don't want to be a target of it, ever. I don't think that spurt of passive-agressive sarcasm (right, Tupp) was at the level of ending the relationship. But I do feel somewhat more guarded now. When she's agitated about something you can feel her nearing a boil and if you're near, you might get a sharp verbal jab.

I will not send it, email's not going. I'm just feeling sad/sorry that it's so hard to find emotional safety. What that means is my own capacity to self-soothe is still not as strong as it needs to be. And I need to provide my own emotional safety. That's difficult when I'm anxious, as those symptoms (can't breathe, chest pangs) are so scary the older I get. But I can talk about this with my T too. Whew.

Thanks so much for listening, y'all. Imagine having a place where in the middle of the night you can turn there and pour out your heart and your worries, and wake up to such insight, practicality, and kindness.

Uber thanks. I hope you know how much help you really give.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on January 23, 2021, 05:03:16 PM
[Internet rabbit holes....just in case anyone here has never read this, it's free now. Intuition is the flip side of self-knowledge, I think. Other-knowledge.]

https://www.pdfdrive.com/the-gift-of-fear-d39893700.html (https://www.pdfdrive.com/the-gift-of-fear-d39893700.html)

If you read nothing else, Chapter Two is GENIUS. I mean that specifically, genius.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on January 24, 2021, 05:49:31 AM
I think being able to self soothe just isn't matched to the current situation, Hopsie.  Under normal circs you'd probably not have been affected by that, she'd probably not have said it it (and it may be that she wasn't meaning it in a sarcastic way, her tone might be off because she's more anxious than usual?  I know I'm more heightened when we're at doctors appointments and I do get sarcastic during those quite often, I think it's nerves?  So maybe that's a factor). I do wonder - and I'm not sure if I'm going to express myself well with this - if people who are more intelligent, creative, eager to discuss (which are the kind of things you like and are drawn to) are also more likely to have certain personality traits - a tendency to lecture, not hear the other person, keep talking when they're asked not to and so on - that are just kind of part of the package?  A bit like that article Dr G posted about depression and intelligence.  Maybe some things that aren't great to be on the receiving end of are linked to people who are very bright/well qualified/creative etc.  I remember many years ago crying at my therapy appointment because I felt so depressed and I felt I was letting my baby down by not being able to be cheerful all the time and feeling so wretched and the therapist, God love her, said to me that maybe he'd prefer a mum who was intelligent, passionate, creative, hard working and devoted to him, who sometimes got down, than one who never got depressed but also never did much else either.  It's always stayed with me.  I know people who are perfectly inoffensive, they never trigger me or make me feel uncomfortable - but they also never delight me or enthrall me with the things they say or make me feel gloriously excited to spend time with them.  I'm not sure entirely what I'm wittering on about now, lol, I'm kind of talking to myself.  But maybe along the lines of the overall package - more good bits than bad and the bad being that distinction between ' a bit annoying or thoughtless' and 'abusive and makes me feel terrible'.  I know I was talking to a friend the other day who goes out with crazy women - violent, possessive, huge mood swings, sleep with his friends, say terrible things about him to people, steal his money and so on.  Every one is the same.  He's just split up with the last one and is in a really bad way, has lost friends over her but said to me that he finds normal women boring.  That's extreme, of course, but it did make me wonder about what we look for in people and whether we have to constantly balance what we need or desire (intelligence, passion, creativity, travel, excitement etc) with what we can get (some of those things along with being over bearing, farting a lot, not being able to watch a film they didn't choose and so on) and just keep balancing in our minds whether the good outweighs the bad and whether the bad is an occasional annoyance or a constant problem.  I am waffling and I'm not entirely sure why lol, I think I need coffee!  Anyway, regardless of all of that, I'm glad a bit of equilibrium has returned to your day, Hopsie, and hope that continues xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on January 24, 2021, 09:34:45 AM
I can understand and appreciate how the anxiety spiral affects everything else, Hops. I'd worry about you more if it didn't. LOL... you're still feeling; that's GOOD. You're still thinking and trying to put things into perspective about interpersonal exchanges; that's GOOD. Right along with the anxiety.

Sun came up again today - that's also GOOD.

;)
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on February 03, 2021, 08:59:24 AM
Hey again.
Amber, the comment you made about needing conversation on Farm Life brought this up.

I miss presence and conversation a LOT. That's why, despite a lot of initial fear of it,  I'm grateful M and I have formed a friendship from the ashes. It's real. Affection is more visible just in our attitudes toward each other. Stakes are low, we just check in, and when we see each other (about once a week, occasionally twice) it's just about talking and company. Now that there's no future-planning or shared-life-building, there's a feeling of ease.

Same time, it's a sorrow we couldn't make it work for the Big Dream I had. I still pretend I could go out once life starts up again and find a mate I could love AND live with.

But the truth is, I do still love M. It's not romantic passion (and that's fine by me) but it is companionable and reliable and real. He's still his compulsive self but his dominating behavior seems to have disappeared. That's likely only because we're NOT merging homes and lives (which triggered his hyper-executive, paternalistic and driven way of wanting to design, decide and be in charge of nearly everything, which drove me mad). And also because the pandemic's restrictions have caused him to appreciate me in a new way, I think. He's also now reduced in size and in power-behavior. By a lot around me, anyway. He still has his scholarly arena where he gets to do all his ego stuff, but where he is also doing good and having a positive impact on thousands. So that's the right arena for his ... bigness.

I can feel his gratitude about me. And it's surprising. I hurt him hard when I left him last summer. I had no choice. But he's found his way to forgiving me, and seems to truly value our time together in a new way. He's not QUITE as one-way with the talking as he used to be. I see him fight with himself to listen more often. (Never for long stretches, mind you!).

He's still egotistical, but what's new is that I can see and feel his vulnerability. Having the universe slam the door shut on his jumping-on-airplanes escape has been a huge blow to him. I think he's reevaluating his life and what matters, as everybody is. The plague got his attention, for sure.

Anyway, I'm trying to avoid fantasy that this year might have changed him in big enough ways that we could wind up living together. But that's maybe risky so I'm trying to turn that off.

I do know that we both kind of light up when we see each other. In me, it's pure gratitude for having one human whom I know pretty well be in my life and safe to see and hug and talk to in person. How huge that is, and how easy before the plague it was to figure that I could replace one stronger connection with a dozen shallow ones.

Regardless of how life turns out or how long it is, I know my time with M hasn't been wasted. I've learned a great deal about myself in the struggle. It's sad that because of our personalities' layers of INcompatibility, it actually felt dangerous to me, stress wise. I feel that a lot less after this period, but I also don't know whether  that dynamic would revert right back to what it was once all this is over.

Wish I did know.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on February 03, 2021, 10:20:10 AM
That's an interesting question Hops - about whether things would revert; or if there would be continued moderation and lowering of intensity. And it will probably take some time/experience to answer that for certain for yourself.

I haven't ever tried to be friends with an ex; just no point given the massive hurt involved in those breakups. I did try to get back with Hol's dad briefly; it was based on dire economic circumstances - and at the time, I'd convinced myself that since I already knew him, I knew what I was in for - and since I was older now, and presumably wiser - I could manage it. LOLOLOLOLOLOL... big mistake! He irritated me and drove me insane worse than before. I was 19 when he & married; he was 10 years older. It just didn't work. (And I'm still trying to pry out from my memories some of the things about him, that cause me to hear all the warning sirens at any suggestion of being in the same room with him.)
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on February 03, 2021, 10:24:14 AM
Well Hopsie, having read this and your post on your health thread about perhaps a quieter life being a more realistic option to pursue, I'm wondering if there's any possibility that you and M could have your own unique relationship.  Do you have to live together?  Could you be one of those couples who love each other, care for each other, enjoy one another's company - but maintain your own homes, your own lives and simply meet up (insert number here) times a week?  Does it have to be all or nothing?  Perhaps it's a completely ridiculous notion but it just got me wondering if a relationship that has all the good bits but maintains enough distance to minimise the more difficult bits might be an option for you both?
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on February 03, 2021, 11:03:46 AM
I think we can have second act relationships with people we've dared.  I've had all kinds of relationships with men I've dated or been married to.  Sadly, the old stuff popped back up when romance was involved, but friendships remain syrong.  There's lifelong connection with several of these men.

As Tupp said, maybe maintaining separate households changed relationship with M into something safe.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on February 03, 2021, 11:57:55 AM
Lighter, I'm really happy for you that you've kept strong positive connections with previous loves. That's encouraging! Do you feel open to the possibility of a new romantic relationship or marriage at some point down the line? Or does life feel better with you and Ds and not focusing there? (Please don't poke if not up to it.)

Tupp, that's really the relationship we're already in now. Exactly what it is. It's just complicated for me, because I want more. Greedy.

The problem is that what I want (which doesn't mean M has to be the solution) is not to live alone. I've been alone over 20 years and it's too long. (Decade in Nmom's house was worse than alone.) I want a love AND life companion, including daily life.

I might not find one. If M and I are now experiencing all we can manage in that arena, it probably won't happen. All the things that broke our bond before might come right back if we tested it. And there's no guarantee that it ever will even with someone new. But my dream (dare I say it feels like a need, now that my health is more fragile than I'd faced) of a shared-life companion rather than just a break-the-tedium or occasional-comfort companion ... is still what it's been since the beginning. I want someone to comment over a daily headline with. Or offer a cuppa when I'm making one, or vice versa. That's it, really. But I yearn for the comfort of that level of presence and home-building. Told M on our first date that I would like to marry again. Off the top on the table, because ... well, that's what I would like. I'm clear about it.

I think chances are pretty high that despite our present relative intimacy because of the pandemic, M might just revert to his usual remarkable self-absorption levels once times are "normal" again so my desire/goal/need for a lived commitment with a compatible partner just would go on the back burner. I'm not expecting it with him, just trying to deal with our new shape without fantasizing, which is dangerous for me. He is still who he is and has a right to be himself. I think he's torn between the emotional security I offer and his freedom, partly because of it, to feel safe and secure again so he can screen out everything but scholarship (including me). He likes seeing me but on a rigid schedule. His (dinner) schedule. That mostly works for me in the ways you and Lighter describe, but days do get lonely. I suspect his wives felt the same way. One couldn't cope; one got sacrificially involved with church and charity. I would want a middle ground, if that were possible to craft.

I have the right to be myself too. Any time I'm sick or lonely or dealing with injury or health scare and it's cold and gray and friends don't phone or email since they're all using FB or getting together isn't possible or practical....it mounts up. A person in a building with you who cares makes a difference. Old age alone in a building or apartment is not what I want for myself. It may --likely-- happen to be what I get as so many older people do, and I'll keep re-making peace with it in the present and remind myself to be grateful. But it's not what I want, which is why I'm trying to stay pretty alert about what's happening (and not happening) with M.

I would like a mate. So. Right now I have a friend I love who is not really a mate. Whom I used to dream was becoming my mate. But now isn't (despite just inviting me to go to California with him when restrictions are gone--I couldn't answer). He likes a travel companion and he likes me in that role. It's weird. Like...we're almost everything we were before but without the security of commitment or a physically shared home or plan that includes us both (house-hunting was hell until I realized he wasn't all in). And of course that's how it is. For now, it's okay. If I stay in the now, and if I'm not sick/scared/lonely, it's okay. It's just weird.

Come spring I hope I will have the confidence to continue dating. I've emailed with a couple guys from that website. But basically, I don't do online real-time chat and prefer to wait until we can meet (summer?) before correspondence. I liked Dr. Sills' advice. Don't get all woozy over anybody you haven't physically met. Don't invest much time in correspondence until you have that coffee date and check chemistry.

I think all this posting in the R-thread today is because I'm feeling wobblier than last time I was checking in about M-friendship, because of the hospital visit. I feel quite vulnerable today. I've written my cousin to ask about her father, my mother's brother, who had multiple TIAs before he died. Given mom's big stroke and his history, I think genes are at play here. They're just acting up too damn EARLY!!

I'm just kind of scared. Feeling vulnerable. Alone is harder than usual right now.

Amber, I'm really glad you protect yourself from seeing Hol's Dad, since he's clearly very triggering for you. If that eases with age then maybe. But if not, that's the beauty of boundaries.

Something I wrote a friend the other day pops into my head thinking about you and your ex and I'm not sure why. But fwiw, see if anything resonates:

I actually think that along with individual strengths,
there is a degree of fragility in me. M used to call me that and I'd become furiously defensive. But in a sense, the way I'm made IS sensitive to the point
that I may need to create for myself protections that other kinds of bears may not.
And it's nobody's job but my own, really, to speak up, set
boundaries comfortably, and just putter on being myself.
(Couldn't stand M's observation which, if I'd agreed,
would've led to even more domineering paternalism. But
there's definitely truth in it.)


I think I'm ready to tell myself that this truth (part not all of me) is okay.
Maybe we don't all have to be STRONG all the time.

hugs,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on February 03, 2021, 03:44:57 PM
Oh good lord no - we can't always be the strong one. And when we do touch our more fragile places, it's a strong want, maybe a need of mine, that my partner be aware enough of me; that he knows me well enough... to be that strong guy without just taking over. Someone who helps me regain my equilibrium & balance - not someone who says: I'll take care of that for you.

It's such a delicate ballet; it's so easy to hurt feelings or hit one of those triggers where one temporarily reverts to old stuff instead of dealing with "what is" in the moment.

It sounds like it would be wonderful thing if there were enough older, interesting folk right in your actual neighborhood that you all could group up for mutual assistance and relaxed social connections. Sort of an "over the hill gang" of singles where you could mingle and participate in activities at your leisure and convenience. Assuming life ever resembles all the available activites that once existed again.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on February 04, 2021, 02:48:01 AM
Oh, Hopsie, okay, I understand better now, I had got the wrong end of the stick (I must read posts after I have coffee in the morning and not before!).  So M is out of the picture regardless - a relationship with him doesn't work because of various aspects of his personality that are too much and a lesser relationship with him won't work because it doesn't meet the need for close daily contact (which I can understand completely).  Okay, I think I see the situation more clearly now (and yes, can completely understand how the need not to be alone intensifies when unwell or something equally difficult to deal with comes along.  Makes perfect sense).

It makes sense to me not to date until you can meet in person.  I tried very hard with online dating years ago and made that mistake of building a 'relationship' via email and text only to meet in person and find there was just no chemistry at all.  It is very disappointing and just a real waste of everyone's time so it makes sense to hang on until meeting up in person is possible.  I do hope very much that someone lovely pops up and things just get easier.  It's all such hard work!  I do envy people who just find 'the one' and it all happens very organically.  For whatever reason some of us have to work a lot harder at it and it's very draining.  I hope you're feeling a bit better today xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on February 04, 2021, 08:43:11 AM
Quote
a relationship with him doesn't work because of various aspects of his personality that are too much

It's BOTH of us. I'm so scared of being controlled and he's a big controller....and my personality is no walk in the park either.

Quote
a lesser relationship with him won't work because it doesn't meet the need for close daily contact

I don't need apron strings or to be smothered in attention. I would like to share a home. I would like to marry. The kind of intimacy I yearn for is more about morning sunlight and tea and a comment on a headline, and watching good programs together in the evenings, than anything grand. He'd like to jet around the world until he drops.

You're right though, I'm mostly just scared about the brain stuff.

It was helpful to read the black-and-white way you put it: "doesn't work" and "won't work." Hmmmmm. Must ponder.

I don't know that our current relationship, because we are in one now, "doesn't work." It is what it is and is a great comfort to me, and to him too. It's just that I haven't let go of the dream. Marriage, shared home, tea and TV. Simple stuff.

The "won't work" because of personality incompatibilities (his and mine) may be the bottom line. Except: he is mellower, I am more grateful, he's trying to listen, I'm trying to be less anxious. It's hard not to feel hope since we still love. Heart spark.

Who knows? I'm working on trying to accept that everything is unknowable to some extent, get my butt back in the present, which is:

--sunlight streaming in on apricot Pooch (her golden hour): I LOVE morning
--my SAD light doing its aquarium best to tell my brain all is well today
--a specific plan for today: ONE thing, maybe two, I'd like to accomplish

Thanks, Tupp. You're very patient.

hugs
Hops

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on February 04, 2021, 01:36:22 PM
Wise choice, to stick with the present - and just experience it as it is - instead of giving in to the temptation of fantasy, Hops.

Looking back over how things transpired, it seems to me you finally got M to take you seriously about how interacting with him, when he's in certain modes, affected you - and that it REALLY affected you. This was accomplished by breaking up. It's unfortunate that sometimes that's the only way for some people to put themselves in your shoes; to see things from your point of view. (If that's what's happened.) And when it only happens occasionally and to a lesser degree... most of the time, people can absorb it and rock on. Some people do wait for a later time, to bring it up and discuss it in detail rather than address it in the now.

Whether or not this is a permanent awareness change, or better managing one's personal impact of the other, or some of everything, only time and experience will tell. But, I do suspect that you'll both learn things about yourselves and each other, and how you guys work together from all this. I get the sense that neither of you feel the previous form of relationship nor the current one was/is a waste of time.

I know I said, you shouldn't have to work so hard to feel heard & emotionally safe in a relationship. Emotional safety and being able to be taken seriously are critical (for me) in any relationship. IMO, without those two things love isn't possible. But we all understand, define and perceive things differently. And even the same person can perceive things in more than one way - some of that's dependent on that ability stand in the other's shoes and look at things from their perspective (and their way of interacting with the world, background, insecurities, education, experience ad infinitum).

But neither should it be such hard work for the other person to wish me safe & heard - and assume their part in that process. The two pieces need to be balanced for stability and resilience in the relationship. IMO.

I'm just glad you're in such a comfortable space with things right now and know how to keep them that way for yourself.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on February 05, 2021, 04:13:30 AM
Well I think you should be scared of being controlled, Hopsie, it's a horrible way to live your life and a nasty form of abuse that's often difficult to spot so I think being frightened of it is very sensible.

I like the plan for the day; one or two things to accomplish and power charging Pooch with sunshine :)  Winter sun is lovely, I bet she looks like a fuzzy gold bear :)  Lol xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on February 05, 2021, 11:30:38 AM
Hi, Hops:

I'm not against happy partnering and relationship.  I'm allergic to negative/unhealthy/ toxic people.

New connection would be welcome if the right doors open....I'd likely step through.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on February 05, 2021, 02:02:31 PM
Good attitude, Lighter.

Hope that door opens if and when you're ready and he's right.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on February 05, 2021, 06:47:45 PM
I've read The Gift of Fear many times, Hops.  What are you referring to in chapter 2?

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on February 05, 2021, 08:14:13 PM
Don't recall a specific point from it, but I think Chap. 2 is where he really drills down on intuition. In the case of fear, it's spidey sense. He also talks about how women in particular are socialized to mistrust their own inner wisdom, their observations, their actual capacities to sense what is safe and good and what is unsafe or dangerous.

I'm such a huge proponent of the idea of inner wisdom and don't believe it's a clear voice from a cumulus cloud. It works that way (a lot) in poetry. Where a good metaphor comes from is deep listening, but without clenching.

(If that makes sense.) I just was so thrilled by his respect for that kind of process and wisdom...it's delicate, profound, elemental and amazing...and exists in every human being.

But we're not taught to know it or trust it, so we live kind of deformed lives sometimes.

That help? Sorry I don't have the PDF open but I think Chapter 2 is revolutionary and inspiring. Even beyond the question of self-defense or physical safety. It said a lot to me about life. (Especially life as a woman in a male-dominated and still male-run and -- yep I love men -- male-distorted culture. Women get distorted too, it's in reaction to a power system that squats on our heads. And men are so harmed also.)

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on February 05, 2021, 09:03:48 PM
Yes. 

Intuition.

Sadly, I read that book many times, along with Strong On Defense, and never really felt...
No.

Never could give myself permission to honor my instincts, which were very good in hindsight.

I felt compelled.....reactive, I guess, to honor the people around me... Who I cared about.

Call it codependent, or need to be accepted or desire to please and seek approval, whatever it was.  It was programmed INTO my brain very early.

I'm glad you're getting so much from the book, Hops. 

For me it was information without all the nuts and bolts I needed to shut out everyone's voices AND listen to my instincts consistently.

Lighter




Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on February 08, 2021, 02:12:37 PM
I see this as helpful, ironic, and centering.
Had a lovely evening with M for dinner, hadn't seen him in a week.
He clearly was very happy Pooch and I were there. I enjoyed it too.
He was seriously excited and positive about the poem.

Later he writes:
Come for dinner on the 14th, please.

I reply:
Re. 14th, imo we should tiptoe, talk a bit about whether
we are in VDay mode or should impose it on ourselves
without sharing something true about what and how and whence....?
Alternatively, I can come the 13th....

He replies:
Okay, the 13th then.

LOL.

Pretty clear that there will be No Talking About "IT."
Even though IT is obvious he still has strong feelings and attachment and I've got them too. The stalemate is where we and IT sit. There's just no acrimony, and no sense of future. Random remarks about older age, but nothing direct about what we could choose to do together. I'm still glad to be in friendship but this helped me re-extinguish some small hopes that over time, he'd be ready to risk actually talking about feelings and future plans. Not yet. Maybe not ever.... Ultlimately, reality is my friend too and a closer one than M. Knew all this, and this little dialogue was just a good, centering reminder about where we are. Undefined, full of feeling, but not something to re-hitch my wagon to.

Without some adult conversation ABOUT our relationship I don't think it's likely I'll continue indefinitely in the exact same way. I'll always care about him of course, but probably won't be planning my life keeping him at the core of it. Or, maybe I will.

I don't even have to know right now and strangely, I'm fairly content not knowing. But asking me over for Valentine's Day evening? That confused me. His answer? Also confused me a bit.

I'm fine. It's just weird. Not pushing anything, just observing.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on February 08, 2021, 03:30:10 PM
Aw, Hopsie.  My outsider's take, for what it's worth, is that you meet M's needs (which is why he invited you over for Valentine's Day) but that he isn't interested in meeting yours (hence going for the 13th rather than talking).  Personally I am hoping that you don't plan your life around him and that you spread your net far and wide as soon as it's safe to do so, so that you can meet someone with the emotional intelligence and self awareness that you need to be happy and healthy (and to be honest I don't think any relationship can be happy and healthy unless both parties are self aware, emotionally astute and capable of having open and honest discussions about anything that needs to be discussed). I don't mean that in an unkind or critical way, but I do think he shows you time and time again that he can't/won't give you what you need.  I don't think he particularly cares that he's controlling, or that he's so uptight about cooking that it makes you anxious, or about the nastiness he showed that time you were on holiday or the night you went home in tears after you asked him to stop (I think it was a time you were being intimate) and he didn't.  I think if he cared about those things he'd be working on fixing them himself.  I am glad that reality is your friend and that you're keeping it that way and I hope it's possible to just enjoy the meal (regardless of the date :) ) and, of course, it's just my opinion, I may have got the wrong end of the stick and be speaking out of turn - in which case feel free to ignore and apologies will be extended :) xx xx xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on February 08, 2021, 03:46:00 PM
No apologies needed, Tupp! I like your straightforward seeing.

And I don't disagree with anything you've pointed out. For me the question lingers whether it's he "can't" or "won't." For now, I assume it's won't. But I'm not upset or angered by it. It's just a timely private re-recognition of where M is and how he is.

I'm getting pretty comfortable in the moment. It's just a bit weird. So clear that he'd care for me (if I were ill) at least for now. As I would for him. But I think maybe that's all he's up to devoting. He'd secure my future, as long as it was his way. Talking through how we feel about things, actually looking together and hearing each other equally? Not yet and likely not ever possible, unfortunately.

I'd like a relationship like the one you describe, and the kind of talking and communicating Amber often describes. Meanwhile, important friendship is a gift during all this isolation. I'm sure things will shift once we're out of Covid jail.

Honestly it really did make me laugh a little. I'm sorry he's so afraid of real intimacy. I feel badly for him. But it was a good and timely reminder.

Thing is, I feel good that I didn't go along with his Valentine's plan. Wasn't fussed, just pointed out it didn't fit for me without any talk about where we are. And still just the same I'll look forward to the 13th.

A whole lot of my tension over our relationship seems to have drained away. I just am not motivated to start some campaign to re-try to convince him about anything. I do think my 3-month absence from his life woke him up to a degree. It made him more conscious of his behavior and me more conscious of my attitude. All good.

Woke me up too. If I keep my health going and continue to leave my writing door ajar, things could go in a really good direction.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on February 08, 2021, 05:32:41 PM
I think there's sunshine streaming in the writing door, Hops. 

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on February 08, 2021, 07:36:33 PM
That's a great image, Lighter.

Thank you!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Meh on February 08, 2021, 10:51:51 PM
Hops,

Admittedly I haven't kept up with everything happening. Is HE the same person that you went traveling with and was obsessed with food planning and food preparation?

Whoever he is, he probably wants company and hasn't thought about it much deeper than that.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on February 09, 2021, 09:00:22 AM
Same guy, Mouse.
I call him M.

He's a really good cook though! :)
He's calmed down in the kitchen and I decided I was being ungrateful.

He's just scared of talking about feelings.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: seastorm on February 15, 2021, 04:59:30 PM
I followed all this and it comes down to he won't talk about his feelings. This could really grate after awhile. I imagine you meet his needs quite wonderfully, you ruby, crystal lovely intuitive soul.

He looks very good and presentable and all that but cool. Take care of your heart, dear one.

Sea
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on February 15, 2021, 10:22:15 PM
Thanks, ((((((Sea)))))).

I am, I think. (And thank you for the lovely things you said.)

I feel more solid in myself than I did while we were trying to navigate a future plan and his forcefulness was so very stressful for me. We're both acting a lot mellower now--from having let the dreams go-- and I do think the pandemic has caused more introspection.

I feel mortal in new ways these days but it's not all bad.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on February 20, 2021, 03:39:27 PM
After several months of floating in a very happy just-friends-companions space with M, I've gotten back into an anxiety space. I think I know why but it'll help me clarify to write it here (as usual).

He's started mentioning me traveling with him once restrictions are lifted. Like to California to see his wonderful kids, their families, and the adorable grandkids. The way he's mentioned it (about 3 times) is now: 'You can come if you want." Also, we wrote back and forth a little about a free screening of an event about Barcelona (he doesn't want to go, mainly I think because he's jealous of his colleage who is hosting it and "doesn't know what he's talking about" -- unlike M, who lived there at one point). I dropped it, and then he wrote: Let's go to Barcelona in July!

I replied -- we can talk about it. But inside, things went awry and I got very anxious and re-read emails from the time I did the breakup in July, just to remind myself what the issues were. And I saw his replies, including comments like "Don't imagine anything new" and "Life's too short [for serious therapy" and there's no time!" etc. And he's also said:
It doesn't have to be that way. (Re. my fears of old age miseries in a nursing home)
There will never BE another woman!

Oy. Bottom line is, I need to believe him and stop the trickle of NEW dreams I'd begun to indulge in myself since we've been such happy and comforted companions as pod-mates during quarantine. Sigh.

What I'm forcing myself to focus on now is:
--He has directly or indirectly refused to talk about our relationship, or feelings.
--He has made multiple comments about not dealing directly with the future, just staying in his house until he can't, and then assuming his kids will come to the rescue. (He's really not concerned with organizing things or planning his downsizing.)
--I believe he realized during our house hunt that he really isn't interested in making a home together or sharing daily life. He never said so, but acted it out.

So. My conclusion is that it would hurt a LOT to go re-bond with his kids, whom I really really adored and who welcomed me like a family member. To re-appear there without any clarity on who I am in their world now would just pile on feelings of outsiderness and to re-bond with the baby and then know I'll never be her grandma just sounds like pain on legs. So I'm saying no to that.

No real conversation about who we are to each other now, and what we EACH want? I think he just wants me to adapt to his preferences, honestly. And I can, to the degree that the occasional shared meal and evening is comforting and fun. But if he's subtly trying to re-introduce travel and family time...I think it's too much for me to handle, without feeling some security. And I don't.

I'm also not feeling fit enough for the stresses of big travel.

So for all those reasons, I'm going to tell him tomorrow evening that I'm not able to go, and perhaps it'd be better if he wouldn't keep inviting me.

(In some ways it feels like he's dangling carrots under my nose. Am I a mule?)

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on February 20, 2021, 04:38:51 PM
((((Hops))))
No....not a mule.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on February 20, 2021, 06:13:11 PM
Got up the nerve to tell him over the phone that I needed that sort of honest conversation now. Told him I'd started re-dreaming and then got quite anxious when he made repeated invitations to be with his family again, much less Spain. And that I wanted to know how he felt too.

He said that because I "summarily executed" him during the last T session, he felt he could never live with or marry me. And that I'm "too self absorbed." But he loves my company and still wants my companionship. Dinner tomorrow.

I think that leaves me between a rock and a hard place, because although it's been very comforting to have the "pod" together, he's been clear. And I have to as well. If I continue pouring so much daily thought and attention into him, my uncertain old age will just get moreso. And what I want is a deeper and fuller relationship, including the commitment that would give me some security. I'm not ashamed of it. I may never get it but I also can't pretend it doesn't matter. I'd live in a state of loss and subtle grieving if I just keep going as it is. It's important that I heard him.

If he's still got his victim narrative going ("The woman broke it off in front of our therapist!") and characterizes that as "unconscionable" -- he's dismissing everything else, villainizing me, and taking no responsibility for any part he played. I think we BOTH contributed to the collapse of our initial relationship. But I'm alone in that, because he wants to blame it all on me and avoid all vulnerability -- and still have the stimulating interesting dinner companion and caring friend he really enjoys.

Truth is, I think he's a dutiful friend to maintain the sparkling conversation times and dinner company. But I'm not experiencing him being a very caring one. He is completely incurious about what I am experiencing. And distress is unwelcome. It somehow breaks the rules.

My poet friend, who's spent some time with us, said she thinks he's very comfortable with pretense. And so a pretend relationship is where he feels at home. The rituals and dinners and silly emails...that's really all he needs. (And he does love Pooch.) For me, those things would be enough too, within the context of a shared life.

I'm glad I talked to him and heard what he had to say. It'll sink in. And I'm grateful for the company and support we've given each other during this pandemic time.

hugs
Hops

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on February 21, 2021, 04:45:24 AM
I'm sorry, Hops ((((((Hopsie))))))

I am glad he's been clear and direct, though, and not given you any false hope or made promises that he can't keep.  I know it isn't the way you wanted things to turn out, ideally.  But hopefully over time the current situation will lessen and the comfort of a pod won't be as essential as it is now.  And I hope you're able to keep being kind and caring to yourself in the meantime xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on February 21, 2021, 12:12:23 PM
Thanks, Lighter.

Thanks, Tupp...
I am a little scared he'll chew me up again, but he promised he won't, he just wants to "explain a few things" to me, so I'm going to dinner.

Thing is, he really can't see much from my point of view so if I say something hurts, his response is to dismiss it by "explaining" why I need to stop feeling what I feel or have no reason to feel what I feel. He's just so far away from understanding how to have empathy, and that emotions aren't something you "agree with" or "disagree with" -- they're just what they are.

My feelings hardly-HARDLY make me right but they also didn't make me wrong last summer. I think the only way he knows how to approach it, if I express distress about anything, is through critique. It's the academic thing, brilliant in his professoring....but applied to intimacy or commitment (or lack thereof) it just backfires. I was confused by his pressure to do V-Day and to go see his family. In tougher women it might not have, but in me, it produced anxiety.

My poet friend said:
His lack of accountability for why you broke up with him shows his shallowness in all this. He just wanted to be stroked and not questioned. A steely center. Lots of unearned pride. He's kind of trying to get his own back on you for hurting him. So no insight. You are better off without him if he's playing on your feelings.

Just tell [M] you are going to date again. That's honest and lets him know you are not seeing him exclusively. You could still see each other but on an honest basis for both of you. No more teasing with travel stuff and his f***ing money and security. He can take that and shove it. You have other options and a future and you will get stronger and more healthy. Yes!


That was rousing.

I feel kind of stupid but also just, Popeye ("I yam what I yam."). I don't blame him for the hurt he felt AND I don't blame myself for last summer or for still having the dream I've got. Zero certainty I'll find a shared-life, committed relationship with anyone, but I can still try. It's much too easy to imagine just folding myself into his life, his preferences and his world again -- as a diminished but tolerated companion.

I don't want to live alone the rest of my life and maybe I won't have to.
He doesn't want to commit because I hurt him, and he doesn't have to.

I succeeded very gratefully in accepting our "new shape" -- until Valentine's Day and him also pushing going to be with his family again and later off to Europe. Those triggered.

So, fingers crossed.

hugs (y'all must be so sick of hearing about this old-woman relationship drama),
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on February 21, 2021, 01:06:40 PM
Well I would suggest that, as he explains things to you over dinner, that you don't get into trying to explain or justify yourself, Hops.  Just, ahem, aha, oh that's an interesting point, and leave it there.  I'm not sick of hearing about your trials and tribulations with M,  but I am concerned about (and don't like) how often you mention being anxious and scared in relation to him.

I think your poet friend has it spot on - I think he'd be very happy to have a relationship with you, but it would be entirely on his terms and you'd have no voice at all.  I do think there are people who don't need a relationship to be two way, and are happy to just have their needs met, regardless of what the other person wants or needs.  I think your confusion about Valentine's Day and family visits are possibly because to you, these things have intimacy and connection and mean something.  I suspect to M, he just likes having someone there and it doesn't need to be any deeper than that.  It doesn't mean the same thing to him - he can invite you because it's just him doing what he wants and having some interesting company as well.  You wouldn't need to be a tougher woman for that not to induce anxiety, just one that isn't seeking a connection and is happy just to blag a free meal and a free trip.

I just had a thought about this as well - He doesn't want to commit because I hurt him, and he doesn't have to.


I don't think he ever wanted to commit in the way that you wanted to, Hopsie, and I think that's always been the problem.  I think the subtext of what he said isn't that he doesn't want to commit because you hurt him, but that he doesn't want to commit because he knows you won't just put up and shut up, and an equal, open, truthful relationship just isn't what he's seeking.  It's just the way it comes across to me - I could have it all wrong, of course.  I hope the meal is nice, and I also hope you don't rise to arguing with him and that, if he gets mean the way he has before, that you just leave.  Keep in mind that we are still locked down here so I can't get over there to kick his arse and I don't think it's as effective on Zoom :) Big hugs xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on February 21, 2021, 01:25:48 PM
LOL!! Thanks, (((((Tupp))))).

I think you're exactly right and I hope to do this evening just that way:

--let him critique and label and hold forth any way he wants (short of abuse)
--just "hold my peace" in peace, slow breathing as required
--don't take any bait, don't rise to any challenge, don't argue or go on defense
--just be peaceful and come home calm

If there's an opening, I will mention that I am going to be dating again once it's warm enough to meet outdoors, because I accept the reality that we-two won't get where I was yearning to go...which I'd shared on date Two. Told him openly then that wanting to remarry and share my life was why I signed up for the site. I probably needed this "curtain call" for it to become completely clear. But now it is.

I'm still so grateful for our pod-time, and will say that. Very. It's been extremely comforting. And in a way I'm glad his unexpected signals about V-Day and California and Europe happened. Without them, I might not have seen where I am in reality and could have continued deluding myself, with increasing fantasies and hopes, until I found myself lost in his wake.

He's a big man, intellectually. He lives in a big house. He has a big fortune. He has a big family. He takes big trips. He has a big ego.

I need a smaller person. I want Mr. Rogers in his humble sweaters and patience and kindness. (Cool! I'm gonna add that to my profile!)

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on February 21, 2021, 08:54:39 PM
Survived dinner! It wasn't terrible. He started off with a lot of YOU-this and YOU-that and I kept asking him to focus on how HE felt, but he just doesn't get it. He worked in a few slices (I "scare people" -- I said who? He said, A. One of his timid colleagues who was online. Before I met M, I had had a few dates with this sweet fellow before I gave up...he would write me pleasant vague emails about how much work he had to do, and never get around to any plans. He was uneasy about having me into his (I think muuy messy) house and just plain avoided actually getting together. So I finally wrote him, very kindly, that I felt he wasn't really ready to actually engage so I would with thanks for having met him--he really is sweet--step back from hoping for dates. He said something vague about "you understand more than you realize" or whatever.)

Seems to me M had been venting his sorrows and somehow it came to that. Fine by me. I just laughed and said, "Well, A's easily scared, then." M chuckled because knew it was true and a ridiculous accusation. But he kept trying to sneak in sharp negative characterizations of me and I wouldn't let them pass. Didn't argue, just said a couple things like, "that isn't true" or "that's unfair" instead of going numb.

We dropped the heavy convo pretty soon, but not before we talked some about house hunting (he didn't get it--it was all about which houses HE liked) and I told him I'd never sensed that even though I'd tried to imagine it, that he could really make me welcome in his house. (Move paintings? Make room for me to express anything of my art or whatever?) He said, "I don't want to change anything." Ta da.

I think he was being himself and also honest, and really isn't up to changing his life enough to include me in a fuller way. Nothing more than a dinner a week, on average. I'm glad we had another try. Hugged him and told him I really love him as I left and he said the same, and I may wind up driving him to the doctor soon because he's got more leg/knee problems. He tells me repeatedly that he is always there to "help me" and I know he means that, as duty and loyalty. He also mentioned something about "pampering" a partner. I think that's really his idea of what love is. Buy her a Jaguar, always do the right thing if she's ill. Get her "woman presents" on appropriate occasions. But as to really connecting or changing his life to make way for us both....he's clear. Not happening.

Then he droned on about department politics for a reallllly long time, we had a lovely meal, Pooch was delightful, and we left.

Survived without big battle or melodrama, and I did tell him I will begin dating again in spring because I would like to get married. I think he was a little shocked but he said, "Oh go for it" or something like that. Sad but felt real, honest. And also -- I think I may have conveyed, please don't take me for granted. Regardless of what he thinks, it's right for me to do that for myself, to have something to look forward to. One meal a week is cozy, but not sustaining.

Thank y'all again so much, for SO MUCH understanding.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on February 22, 2021, 12:39:44 AM
I'm glad it was civilised, Hopsie, and that it didn't get nasty and unpleasant. At least now the air has been cleared, you both know exactly where you stand and Spring isn't too far off and hopefully it will be easier for you to get out and about without such a risk once you've had both jabs etc.  I do find it funny that some men find women 'scary' because they communicate their needs :)  Lol.  It's good that you've got a dinner/lift if you need it buddy (I think that sort of network is always helpful) and it's all ended on a nice enough note.  Hope you are doing okay.  I know that sometimes the 'other' feelings can hit once the moment's passed so I hope you are feeling alright xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on February 22, 2021, 02:49:02 PM
OK, so you've learned a lot Hops. What you like/don't like; want/don't want for who you are now. You jumped in and took the risk - the emotional risk - of allowing yourself to dream with M. All while minding your boundaries and not allowing him to push you too fast. Protecting yourself.

Then, you put on your practical hat. From under that feathered brim, you quickly realized what was dysfunctional between you too -- and you went to work to make things better. And dealt with the disappointment of M's lip service to the idea, without making any substantial changes because he was getting what he wanted and it's beyond his ability to try to give you what you want. Just means he is the wrong guy for you.

I keep examining how I define commitment - and what is possible for individuals within commitment; what that looks like in real life terms. I think this changes as we grow & mature; and as we assume responsibility for our own basic needs - and even for social connection needs outside of the prime relationship - so that it may be absolutely possible to achieve that romantic commitment because the needs of earlier life aren't mingling in that definition. There isn't such pressure to "provide", "make a home", childcare responsibilities, etc.

IMO there's no one "right" definition of commitment - and sometimes I want what I want and simply don't care if anyone approves or not, as long as the interesting party is interested in the same thing - or close enough, that it's only a small gap that needs bridging. My partners - with a small number of exceptions - have mostly had some basic fundamentals in common with me and that's made things simpler and easier; fewer misunderstandings.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on February 22, 2021, 06:18:00 PM
YES to the fundamentals, Amber.

I think, though, in my present circumstances, this looms larger than for you:

Quote
the needs of [edit to make it me] LATER life aren't mingling in that definition. There isn't such pressure to "provide", "make a home"

I gotta work on this. Really make peace with my fears of old age alone in a not-nice care home. Given what I can't afford.

It's never been M's JOB to smooth that fear away for me. But he did. Repeatedly. Over and over.

So realizing he was just saying what he thought I wanted to hear....is small comfort now.

But I need to really step up and face uncertainty, even embrace it. I just have horrible fears, having spent waaaaaay too much time with elders in nursing homes substituting for their families....of being in that circumstance.

Oh well. I can still grow up more. Face facts and work on my fears.

It's never too late for that.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on February 23, 2021, 08:10:29 AM
Gotcha Hops. That's an entirely different topic too. And another deep one.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on February 24, 2021, 10:54:56 AM
Judith Sills (A Fine Romance) had a couple of great terms, like "the switch" which somebody referenced. Another one was "the curtain call" -- and it hit me that's a perfect explanation of what I was going through recently.

The quarantining, loneliness, etc, plus the "pod" safety I felt with M, plus the residual affection, etc., all added up to me totally losing my balance and beginning to tell myself I could slide back into the story (and that of course meant he also would be ready to work together to make the dream real).

I feel relieved today. I drilled in obsessively (as you've no doubt noted) re-analysing, picking away, poking, thinkingthinkingthinking...and then over the last two days re-read all 50 pages of this thread.

It was an enormous help. I saw the whole arc in clearer view. His humanity and mine. I also saw the bright lines for what they are, both mine and his. And I think I've re-let the fantasy go, with much relief. (I had let Fear of Future corrupt my courage and I'm getting it back).

I'll still see him now and then. But I'm not, hopefully and determinedly, going to lull myself again into focusing everything around him. When people tell you who they are, believe them. "Don't imagine anything different." What an insane message for a poet!

Spring is coming and life is calling and even if that means living alone, I'm going to live until I don't!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on February 25, 2021, 12:16:27 AM
I'm glad you've been able to see things a bit more clearly (realistically?), Hopsie, and that things are less intense.  I think it's perfectly natural to really desire companionship and affection, even more so with this winter that we've all just been through.  I do understand the Fear of Future aspect; it is a big unknown and I'm the Queen of not being able to tell myself 'what will be, will be' in many situations so I do get that.  Are there other options between 'married' and 'alone in a care home'?  I don't know what the situation is like over there and please don't feel that you have to explain all the things that aren't available or that just wouldn't work, I'm just curious as to whether there are other things in between.

I'm glad you have a spring in your step again and that things are looking a bit more constructive again xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on February 25, 2021, 06:34:52 AM
The only unexamined option I can think of, Tupp, would be to build a small wing onto my house with a bathroom and 3rd bedroom that I could rent to a roommate. Currently it'd be hard to share my house with another person I'm not close to. Two BR (one being my office/study) and 1 small bath. I don't think it's rational to assume I could do it now. The kitchen, quite small, would be a challenge to share. A housemate would have to be somebody transient, I think. A student or such. Right now, the loss of privacy and taking in a stranger would be more stress than it's worth.

However, to add a small wing would cost half my retirement savings, which are skimpy as is. So I am just going to try to rebuild my health and keep on living until whatever happens, happens. This week I started taking walks again and am more active in the house than I've been all winter. Bought a new scale too, to keep on track. Otherwise, get more intentional about living more in the present, rather than scaring myself all the time about tomorrow. I think the most important investment I can make is in other people -- getting more involved in caring for others and focused more on the community.

I heard you mention retirement the other day, and no pension. I hope there will be some way for you to keep on saving and keep up your walks and healthy eating too. I guess the old saying "health is your greatest wealth" is really true.

I remember you asking me about co-housing, community etc stuff...and the co-housing here is out of reach financially for me. There's no other option for aging with others than old-age communities that cost currently, on average, more than double my income. I am actually very lucky to be where I am. The only drawback is isolation and fear of getting really old alone. I will try to set up some financial manager for myself who could take over if I become disabled--the stroke and subsequent brain events have forced me to think about it lately. (My best chance of safe financial management if I'm unable would be a good person from my church, I think.) Right now, I just have everything I own in trust for my daughter, so if a health catastrophe happens, a nursing home couldn't come after the house and take all my assets. At that point, to get long-term care one has to "spend down" assets to own no more than $5,000 total. Then the Medicaid program will pay for your nursing care in a home (but my fears of the quality of that care are huge--having seen too many oldsters drooping in wheelchairs in a hallway all day and subject to neglect or worse). The other option which I'm extremely reluctant to consider, would be to sell my house one day to pay for a care home for myself, and I really want to leave it to my D, who'll never have her own home otherwise. All one can hope for is a quick end but you never know. Plan as best I can and release the outcome! (And also just try to think about it LESS. Once I have all the paperwork reviewed and rationally prepared, that's the best I can do.) I know you wrestle with all this stuff too, and with a much bigger concern than I have, for your son.

I ordered veggie seeds yesterday and plan to start some indoors when they come, and begin clearing weeds out of the veggie beds. Will add compost to the beds and do what I can to garden like I mean it this time! Minimal but satisfying.

hugs
Hops

I realize I inherited a lot of my mother's anxiety, and it's a mental habit I want to work against more consciously. ADD doesn't lend to meditation easily but I might add that too. Although at the hospital the other day my BP was super LOW. Odd.

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on February 25, 2021, 09:04:24 AM
One thing I know for sure, is a person can't know for sure all the details of what any imagined/researched/perceived future is. It can all look perfect when you get there - but life simply can't resist bringing up challenges, the things we thought were impossible, etc. So, making the best of what you've got is a good life skill too.

Because you could charge a roommate rent, it's possible you could recover & add savings to the cost of building a wing. But building costs right now are going up like crazy. Know that for a fact. And then, there's my recent experience of having people live here - the first time I've ever shared "home" like that. And while Hol was helpful and knows my preferences from growing up with me... no one else felt obligated to do things to my liking, and did just as they liked. One of the reasons I'm on the housecleaning binge is to "reclaim" the whole house as "my space". And put it the way I like to keep it. Even tho Hol has some good ideas, they're HER ideas; not mine. Which is why being able to build her a house was a better solution, because I was able to do it.

I think you can enjoy your single life - and continue to date, as interesting men show up Hops. More of an "all of the above" approach... who knows what will happen? Everytime I tried to pin down an identity or description thereof that was "me" - some impertinant younger person would come along and present incontrovertible evidence that I was also "this"; "that" idea was wrong; and proceed to lecture me on sticking labels on myself. LOLOLOLOL. Fortunately, she lets me return that favor.   ;)

Lots of new stuff shows up in this stage of life. Comtemplating one's own end of life is just one of them. But I have a sneaking suspicion that subconciously our feelings/thoughts about that inevitable experience also color how we live those remaining years of life too. Could be a topic for a thread, probably. There's all the practical, legal side of things - and then there's a whole unexplored territory of cultural ideas, the spiritual side, etc that color and energize our fears. Even Hol & I cycle around to this topic from time to time... and I'm getting the sense that some of it is helping her deal with her anxiety more than mine. My plan so far, consists of continuing to stay as engaged with life - and it's curveballs - and to continue learning, growing, and "seeing" enough to not depress the living shit out of myself and put myself in the "give up" space. But that choice was formed over years and lots of experiences; it suits me and my wacky creative and non-conformist personality. I figure it's got to be a whole easier to be "eccentric" the older I get, simply because the social assumption is I'm past being important or useful to society. To me, this feels like true freedom to BE.

HA! Hold my beer and watch this...
:D
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on February 25, 2021, 09:39:32 AM
Well first, I am still laughing at Skep trying not depress the living shit out of herself :)  Lol, there is a T shirt slogan in there :)  And yes to being eccentric, mad as a box of frogs, not giving a crap what other people think and all of that as well :)

I do hear you though, Hopsie, and the situation is similar here (I just wondered if you had other possibilities in place over there but it seems not).  It's somewhat baffling to me that we've created a society where people are living longer than ever before, thanks to science and medicine, and where we're all encouraged to make work our primary focus and own a home, but then are expected to live out our old age with little or no help and our only source on income being the home we live in.  I feel there must be a better way to do this!  There is a balance, isn't there, between living for the moment and focusing on now, but also trying to put some sort of safety net in place as we know the state sponsored one is full of holes :) I do like the sound of you focusing on health and living life, though.  I can understand having someone else living with you may not be an easy option.  I think it's frustrating when, having spent so many years caring for others, as you have, there's no-one around to care for you.  It feels like an unkind joke has been played.  But I will keep everything crossed that good things and experiences are coming your way, Hopsie, along with warmer weather and less threat from Covid xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on March 08, 2021, 12:29:31 PM
I'm getting a lot friendlier with my inner eccentric or wacko or just peace-loving person too.

Still seeing M about once a week, nice dinner, lots of chat (mostly his), and it's a pleasant but less-interesting routine than it used to be. I see more slivers of th darker side of his personality more clearly, as well as my own. Neither of us is glowingly wonderful, and as long as I'm compassionate, it's okay to continue for now anyway. I'm almost relieved to be looking with clearer eyes at areas of incompatibility that are good reasons for me not to wish it'd turned into a lifetime.

But while I'm here....

I loaned him a book by a dear friend and mentor and literary doyenne in this region, now in her early 80s, who'd valued my young poetry enough to secure me a book through the National Endowment for the Arts grant that funded her small press, which is now a regional powerhouse for poets and fiction writers. She's been generous to other writers at an indescribable level and had done the same for me, many years back. She showed me my value and I was astonished.

She sent me her latest volume which is a collection of heartfelt poems about her grief for her partner, whom she'd found dead of a heart attack on her neighbor's lawn when he'd gone out to chase their escaped dog. I like her poetry here and there but most of all, I genuinely love her.

I was thinking of M's loss of his wife two years ago because he's mentioned her more lately (mostly about exotic trips they took) -- and thought maybe it would be meaningful or helpful to him. I forgot that he takes everything written that comes into his hands as an opportunity to be a critic. He identifies very powerfully with that...power. So he rains contempt on anything that's not as brilliant as he is, basically. Think of your most pompous professor, brilliant with an ego the size of Moby Dick, and add steroids (she said, nastily).

Anyway, he tells me with intensity where she ranks in comparison to me three different times--the minute I answer the phone or walked into his house--despite my recoil and attempts to change the subject...it's his first and only response and, being M, he repeats and repeats and repeats his opinion...

"You're a much better poet than she is!". Okay fine, he's welcome to think that. But it's almost the only thing he has to say. And, this is hard to convey, but it's the glee with which he criticizes, his joy in labeling someone as less than elevated or stupendous or whatever he respects...there's this...nastiness in it. I really didn't like it. She is my friend and I've talked to him about her a lot, and at one point we talked about visiting her together and the idea of introducing them brought me joy, because she is so warm and generous of spirit everyone who meets her falls in love. If he didn't enjoy her work as much as mine, he could've just said something like, "Truth is, I like your poetry better and hers didn't do as much for me." I would've understood that and said once, it'd have been fine.

But as he pounded his who-WINS opinion at me, for a competition I never entered nor would, and it helped me see another layer. M is driven by insecurity, despite his ridiculous and well-earned level of success, and for him it's ALL and ALWAYS about who's good-better-best. Never just about the humanity of anyone, nor grace. It's where do they RANK in whatever hierarchy he's focusing on (whether professional or cultural or status especially), and in particular, do they (or I, in this instance) bow down to HIS assessment of their value? He can be really condescending and scathing about describing people in his professional world...particularly younger "woke" women in the department, as a matter of fact. He's dripping contempt when he describes them, mocking not just their ideas but their tones of voice, their ignorance, etc. He does the same when he mocks people with country accents, etc. I really dislike it. A lot.

Anyway, when he applied this reflex to a friend I have loved and valued for many years, and unnecessarily, it was helpful in moving my disengagement another bit.

I understand that from his lofty and probably terrified perch, he views status as everything, and probably thought he was giving me a compliment by denigrating my friend's work. One thing that is very deep for me about poetry and creative writing is that I do NOT view it as competition, and never will. To me, the impulse to write is sacred and I respect that ember in all others who have the same dream. I taught children who couldn't spell but found extraordinary metaphors in their minds. I taught undergraduates as a Teaching Fellow while earning my graduate degree, and had the same attitude toward them. "Grading" was torture for me because of the gut attachment to loving the writer more than the writing.

That's a huge difference between M and me. I'm not "better" than he is and vice versa. But his way of clawing everything into a competition, a performance, and gauging others' value by where they stand on a series of ladders: degrees, publications, plaudits, awards, prizes, wealth, social status, native intelligence, and so forth...I completely understand that this is to some degree characteristic of the academic world. It just has gone all the way to his soul, that clawing need to be the Biggest-Best-Brilliantest, all of which, even though it's true in one area, leaks into everything he sees and values.

My dad was a quiet success in his field and much respected. Yet I never once heard him tear down a colleague -- or anyone ever, in fact -- to make himself feel more important. And I realize this is sad for M, though he's happy exercising his power in the language that rewards him (he's not sad about it, he relishes his critical role).

Sigh. Poor guy. Aging and losing his relevance and power drip by drip is very hard on him. He dreads irrelevance more than death itself. Recognition and reward and applause drive him and he's earned all of it. He just can't stop.

He has another very interesting reward coming in the fall...he's been invited by the Russian government to lecture at their flagship cultural university on his historical field. It's ironic. And he's very excited about the trip. He'll soon be off to California and Costa Rica and then later, Europe and Moscow. I know he's somewhat sorry not to have a companion along, but he's going to get public praise and applause at the other end, and that's what matters most. I'm truly happy for him.

And very happy that I'm not going along. It's not fun for me any more, without the shared life dream. It's also exhausting, and until I'm sure I'm healthy, I'm not going to stress myself with all those time zones! I want my life to get smaller and simpler now, not grander. He needs that level of adrenaline and I don't.

So there's an update. It's been an interesting adventure with M, but for me, it's down to an occasional evening listening to him talk about himself, and enjoying great cooking and playing with Pooch. That's all it'll ever be, and finally, that's OK. I'll soon be returning to the oldsters dating site online and one never knows.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on March 09, 2021, 01:01:40 AM
(((((Hops)))))))  Whilst I'm sorry things didn't work out for you, I'm also glad that your rose tinted specs have come off and you're just seeing things more clearly - and able to accept them as that.  I've not really anything useful to say as you've said it all yourself much better than I can.  I only had one thing I wanted to mention:  " I'm not "better" than he is and vice versa".  I think you are better than him and I hope you find someone better, too ;) xx

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on March 09, 2021, 08:55:18 AM
Thanks, Tupp.

I'd still like M to be happy, because I care about him. I see what's vulnerable and want to be gentle with that part. Every now and then I just get sick of the ego.

I'm just still working at my untwining. I have to adapt to being alone and have begun to face that being around him is both pleasurable at times and also risky.

Being as alone as I am/feel is a big challenge. Having M in touch daily is both a comfort and an avoidance.

I think I'll continue to get better at being on my own again. I'm just sometimes a little shocked at how difficult it's been to not look to his voice (in email, on the phone) as an anchor of reassurance. I think I've come to doubt how much he'd really be there for me in future now anyway. His hyperbole about his steadfast support might have just been the same kind of hyperbole he always has used.

And given that the shared dream is over, it's probably going to be better for me not to think of him first thing in the morning (where's the morning email?) etc. Yet I still do. It's a reflex, a habit, and will take time to let go of.

I'm making big headway. Spring is here. But it's been shocking how deeply embedded/entwined I got. My theory is that so many years -- decades -- of life spent focused on Nmom made me DEEPLY comfortable with tending to M, who is as insecure as she was and in some ways almost as narcissistic.

He's a lot more charming and a lot more fun than she was. Maybe that's the difference. But recognizing the enormity of lifetime "training" to attend to someone very narcissistic is what's startling me right now.

Not in a bad way. In a learning, wake-up way.

hugs
Hops

I'm holding all that and trying to find the right balance.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on March 09, 2021, 10:16:36 AM
All perfectly understandable, Hopsie, and all things take time to adapt to and for readjustment to take place.  And I think the thing with a lot of 'narcissistic' (I only put that in inverted commas because you can put all sorts of different words in there, but basically anyone a bit manipulative/selfish/self absorbed and so on) people is that they often are good fun, charming, helpful (to an extent) and so on.  No-one's perfect so it's understandable that anyone would be willing to put up with some imperfections in someone else.  Always a balance between a person's good characteristics and their not so good ones and not wanting to be alone, particularly as one gets older and even more particularly during this horrible pandemic, is just very human.  I do understand (and see so many echos in my own situation with fair weather friends and the dirty old man next door - my entire life has been about prioritising other people and it's so easy to not even realise it's what's happening).  That said, I am glad you were able to see it in M and not continue down the rabbit hole, as hard as it is to face reality sometimes (says Tupp, who's had enough of reality for one day and is planning a box set festival later on today :) ).  I'm keeping everything crossed that the right balance is there to be found and that there's a nice bloke on the end of it :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on March 09, 2021, 10:09:35 PM
Thanks, (((((Tupp))))).

I feel a lot better than I did earlier.
Beautiful day. I finished editing my poet-friend's novel, which I did intensively as a farewell gift for her. She has meant so much to me, the only regular connection I have with another poet IRL who gets that outlier, unconventional take on life and culture and everything...and she's going to be listing her house and moving with her cranky partner to another state where her daughter and adorable granddaughter live. It's a wonderful move for her as her relationship's been often unhappy (but she can't quit him) as she'll have so much daily contact with her close family. She's also excited to live in/near a big city again as she's ready for a last big adventure.

I'm really happy for her but sad for me. Apart from that one time I wrote here about (the stupid social-distance fight on a walk) she and I have been very close and extremely supportive of each other for nearly 10 years-ish now. I'll miss that connection a great deal. We'll write and call and maybe even visit, but her upcoming departure has been weighing on me. Today she reminded me that there ARE good poets in this community I can connect with, and she's right.

So I wanted to do a BANGUP job on her book, and I did. Three hundred pages of close editing. She was thrilled and I choked up telling her I did it as a goodbye gift. It's off to the designer (my young graphic artist friend, I introduced them) and I'm so proud of her.

I think this spring will be a slow and tenative re-awakening and I hope, a building of new friendships when the opportunity comes.

A nice bloke at the end of it would be awesome (as long as he can tap dance).

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on March 10, 2021, 03:27:07 PM
Just had a great time with my T realizing how much I've come awake, in a way. I feel clarity like crazy. Thanks to Pfizer, probably. LOL.

The cues and little pokes etc. from M just aren't taking effect as they used to.

I'm not angry. I'm feeling relief. Glad I recognized another manifestation of old lessons I will re-learn as often as I do...and in time. To liberate myself. To refocus on what matters to ME, in my own life.

How lucky I am. How many good people I know. How much possibility there is until there isn't.

How free I feel right now. (High on vaccination #2, for sure. Only two hours in the line today and much of it chatting with an attractive man my age. HAH!)

Life feels good and I feel GRATEFUL!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on March 11, 2021, 10:22:11 AM
That was a lovely gift for your friend, Hopsie, and I hadn't realised she was the one that was moving away.  That is a shame, I know there was the little walking tiff but we all do things like that sometimes and one who ha in ten years isn't bad!  Was it her poetry that M was being a bit dismissive of.  I'm so glad that the clarity is coming with M, as well.  It's very hard to extricate oneself from a relationship when strong feelings are there, less so when it all feels a bit less intense, I think?  It's nice when one of those 'my head knows I shouldn't but my heart makes me want to' bubbles bursts and the compulsion just goes (or at least lessens enough to be less of an issue).  And a second vaccine as well!  Truly good news.  It should give you so much more protection (in a few weeks, I think, if it's the same as the ones they're using here?).  I do think from what I've read that vax + mask + hand washing and keeping space will mean that pesky Covid will have little opportunity to take up residence and that can only be a good thing.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on March 11, 2021, 02:56:25 PM
Thanks, Tupp.

Nope, the poet friend he dissed was an older long-time mentor in another city, where I went to school (under- and grad-). This poet he's very fond of (largely because her parents were famous academics he revered) but he hasn't seen her poems. And I'd never show him any....

Things do feel a lot less compulsive with M. I'm relieved. And he still might drop by some ice cream. (He asked if I needed anything to tell him, repeating it five times, so I decided I "need" Cherries Garcia. Haven't had ice cream in forever.)

Yes, in two weeks I will be comfortable having others in my house (only those I know have been fully vaccinated including two doses for some brands and then have waited two weeks afterward). But that's still HUGE! Otherwise, nothing changes yet as to public behavior, masking, distancing, etc. One thing is that I'll revert to those simpler paper masks in public. The N95s nearly suffocated me and trigger SOB.

The timing with spring is really nice, though any time is good to feel a first step.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on March 11, 2021, 06:50:14 PM
I'm picturing you in the sunshine, Hops. Smiling.  Feeling free.  Happy.

Congrats I'm in your second jab; )

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on March 11, 2021, 07:52:08 PM
Thanks, Lighter.
We only stood in line for two hours this time.

I think I told the saga of two weeks ago (Jab One). People shared a link for appts they weren't supposed to share, so 1700 people showed up for 400 slots. Most of them did have appts. They turned back, apologizing, those under 65 and the rest of us waited 4 hours in line.

Yesterday was much better, the National Guard really helped and the actual vaccinating was done extremely efficiently. But they'd re-booked all the OVER-numbers that appeared two weeks ago for yesterday, so had the same crowd!

Fortunately my appt was earlier in the day this time, so not so bad at all. Gorgeous weather and people getting to know each other in line was fun.

Hope you can get jabbed soon, Lighter. Hope EVERYONE soon will. It's coming.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on March 14, 2021, 01:33:52 AM
Everyone needs ice cream, Hopsie!  It's a very basic human essential; we get ours from a local dairy and oh my days, it's delicious.  I have to limit myself to a small scoop as a treat every now and again because I could easily eat a tub of the stuff lol.  And then the empty tub becomes a bird bath!  Perfect all round.  I'm glad the tie to M has loosened a bit and imagine how lovely it will be to have friends round again!  Astonishing.  I'm glad the second jab went well.  We have been so lucky with the way ours have been orgnanised - I took son yesterday for his, we got there bang on time, straight in, jab done, he got a well done sticker!  I told the nurse I hadn't been given a sticker when I had mine done and she laughed and said neither had she and she wanted one, too :)   So efficiently done, how lucky are we all that science can do this and make it possible for us to get on with our lives?  I'm looking forward to reading about your first soiree!  I hope it's an ice cream party :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on March 15, 2021, 08:48:15 AM
Lifting fork full of rice and black beans...
To jabs, ice cream and a return to soires.

Yes.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on March 18, 2021, 10:43:32 AM
Relationship to self: Managed to avoid the ice cream and I'm glad about that. Hired garden helper and that feels good. This is about health and joy and doesn't require hand-holding. Back help sometimes, but not psychological "oh Hops, venture out."

Rship to M: Didn't take his call last night (would like to bust up the ritual because it's like "tucking him in" and ensures he's the last thing on my mind before sleep). Happy to pick up when I genuinely feel like a chat but not as a ritualized thing. Wound down by reminding myself I've always wanted to learn the Moonlight Sonata and I have a piano in the next room. Had it going through my head a while...nice.

Rship to friend: Had a really good talk with T yesterday about friendships, much on my mind since poet is moving in a few months. We got into the whole familiar issue of how much I adapt myself to other personalities. My goal is to become a lot more discerning when I FIRST meet people, so I recognize early on whether they're a personality type that is likely to trigger my childhood placate-an-N familiar but perversely comfortable behavior, or my adult observe/discern/decide (sounds like Lighter) behavior that would help me be intentional about who's good for me.

One significant thing is that I've lately come to recognize that several of my closest friends are people who do some of what Tupp's put up with. They launch into talking about themselves and I often struggle to feel heard or have a turn. And there are nuances. My longest-term local friend does this but is also loyal and loving and would and has come to help me in time of need. I've gradually accepted that our relationship is kind of 80-20 in terms of who gets the listening, but I also value her and understand why she does this (trauma), and most of the time, don't mind. Another is just a loyal block of a solid person who nonetheless dominates conversations and exits abruptly--no social graces to speak of but she gave me a car to use for six months when she didn't even know who I was (church--heard I needed it and just handed over the keys). And M is M.

Anyhoo, a more recent friend (6 years) I've probably mentioned here is also a professor and consults with the World Bank. Very high-powered confident bright and absolutely driven woman--successful, compulsive about work, type A+++. Met her at church when she volunteered to co-chair my committee as she was looking for new friends. We hit it off and she's been very intentional about keeping in touch, etc. She is socially different in that she calls and kind of recites what she's been doing in a very literal way. But she also has always made very specific statements about how important our friendship is to her, etc etc. I have liked having a loyal friend who calls regularly but also been drained by my own reaction of talking when she pushes "Play" -- almost feeling like entertainment for her rather than meaningful dialogue. Anyway, no harm in everything not being interesting, but there's been a twist that kind of opened my eyes.

She has a very controlling personality covered with a layer of geniality (in ways similar to M). She is also vulnerable at times and appealed to me when one of her adult daughters was estranged as she knew I understood what she was going through. But she has other areas she's protective about to the point of paranoia. She once was very scared that having met M (who immediately said, oh I know so and so in your dept do you know so and so?) I would tell him something about her possible early retirement plans. She told me not to mention anything about that to him and so I didn't, simple as that.

But there's a kind of something going on that I don't understand, and my T helped me figure out that it's fairly toxic. Friend is normally in touch almost every day via text or phone or email, so when she suddenly didn't respond (I'd sent various messages) for days I felt concerned and emailed her hubby, who sent me a vague reply that she was "going through shit" and might not reply for a while, I was confused and also a bit anxious (she'd gotten angry at me for having another woman over at the same time and not taking care of her feelings because that woman was her enemy, y'all might remember that one). At that time she'd stopped speaking to me and when she went silent this time I wondered if that was happening again.

Anyway, loooong story a little shorter, she finally called and it turned out she'd been in the hospital, almost died, and is now home recovering. But she isn't saying what actually happened and has made it that I'm "such an open personality" (iow, a gossip) that she'd prefer "not to share the details." I responded that her privacy belongs to her and I understand that. But inside, I began to feel weird. She's always been so intense about making statements about how valuable our friendship is and how I'm her closest friend here...and it just doesn't seem like a real closeness to me. When we finally talked I realized I wanted to be intentional in what I said and told her that I completely respect her right to draw a boundary but I also am realizing we're not quite as close as I'd thought.

The T followed the whole thing and told me in a way she hears chimes of control and something toxic in my friend's behavior or her way of "managing" our relationahip and I realized she was right. Once again I had gone into the orbit of a very dominant, controlling, brilliant personality. Friend loved sharing with me because I am very compassionate. But she also projects a lot (like M) and when something's not right within her she tends to blame or last out. And I'm handy.

T thinks that I have a reflex to be compassionate and when someone shares vulnerability I want to heal them, which is kind, but I sometimes (IRL) set up a pattern where that's all I'm there for. And dominant personalities are sometimes mostly natural and no harm done--how else would we have leaders, surgeons, etc?--and sometimes they can harm. Intentionally or not. I'm just way too experienced in accomodating very strong personalities that like to control, if I'm not careful.

So I have a more wary attitude toward this friend now. I'll still be supportive but not play along so unconsciously with that pattern. And I do keep confidences. Sheesh.

Anyhow, that's it from Relationship Land. Not all bad at all, I just feel like my learning is turbo-charged these days. And being intentional about relationships is something I really am focusing on more.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on March 18, 2021, 01:34:27 PM
Hmmmm... you're tapping into some things I've been thinking about Hops, re: the recovering friend.

The "need to be needed" is a component of the dynamic of co-dependance, many times. But lately, I've been wondering about the person on the other side of that relationship. A LOT, in fact.

I don't know anymore of the particulars about this friendship than you've relayed here, so the only thing that occurred to me reading your description, is that our definitions of things like privacy, vulnerability, compassion -- are all at different places on the yardstick that "imaginarily" we can use to measure the relative amount of those kinds of intangible things. I do know that quite often - the actual yardstick measurement for most people - varies according to day, situation, mood, and even how well a person slept the night before.

We're all moving through time & space with a zillion variables that can (momentarily) impact what we can & choose to do. But then, there is also the pattern or trend of a specific trait/experience that exists over a longer period of time. I'm beginning to dislike the label of "toxic" in the context of relationships because there's this built in assumption that the other person is intentionally doing a "thing" that puts one on the back foot -- and therefore are helpless to change, or redraw a boundary, or to ask for what one WANTS or needs. It's only toxic if the aspect of experience never changes, is an expectation of the relationship that can't be negotiated, or one is so dependent upon the transactional aspect of the interaction... that it would be a real emotional loss to just stop engaging in it. (Needing to be needed falls into this dynamic.)

But that's completely ignoring the other person's position on that imaginary yardstick for different things - and that they are not identical - and therefore their definitions aren't either - to their relationship partner. It would presumptious to assume people all have the same definitions about things like this. (And I know you don't; just thinking out loud about stuff that's been rattling in my brain lately.)

Anyway, about the other person in a co-dependence situation... I've been wondering what they get out this (and understand there are as many answers as people; whether it's something they perceive themselves as needing - to provide for something they can't or don't know how, to do for themselves. Whether they are self-aware enough to even realize their partner is engaging in co-dependence and that's the nature of the relationship. Seldom (I think?) do both partners have that same need to be needed behavior.

INTERdependent relationships are when there isn't a consistent role, or pattern that exists in interaction - when people take turns with the roles, and the things provided are different, yet still serving a practical or emotional purpose for the other - or so I think today. This is all theoretical, work in progress crap in my head that's come up from thinking about, feeling, sorting several different relationships.

It's probably way more than you want to entertain, too. Sorry about that.... it's been a little quiet around here lately and I'm full of myself, I guess.

PS - when I type stream of consciousness; trying to say what I mean so other people can follow me - I seriously need an editor!!  LOL. The missing conjunctions... aren't insignificant. Maybe I haven't decided which one really does go there?  Yes, I'm having a real weird-o day today...  ;)
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on March 18, 2021, 04:15:58 PM
This makes a lot of sense to me, Amber:

Quote
INTERdependent relationships are when there isn't a consistent role, or pattern that exists in interaction - when people take turns with the roles, and the things provided are different, yet still serving a practical or emotional purpose for the other

And I've been most definitely "Co-." In many situations.

One thing I'd add is that in my experience, I do not believe that those who've "taken advantage" (deliberate quotes) of my interest in showing compassion, helping heal, intense listening, etc. -- are doing so intentionally. Not at all. I think it's as unconscious a "fit" for them as mine is for Narcissists.

I think what's happening for me in the midst of having lightbulbs go off about my patterns in relationships is paralleled by not being angry, feeling victimized or blaming. I really do believe that most of us (unless we're sociopaths) are doing the best we can with what we've got, and that learning is slow and lifelong, but insight or inspiration can come at any point.

I'm just grateful to feel that more is clear to me now. If I blamed anyone else for my suffering I'd have to also blame myself--since vulnerable or not, ultimately we own who we are (since nobody else can). Apart from intentional abuse or cruelty, then, I'm steering clear of blame as much as I can, going forward.

And continuing to try to come down on the side of love, compassion and forgiveness. Sounds treacly but think of it as anti-anxiety. It helps the letting go or releasing the outcome.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on March 18, 2021, 04:51:19 PM
Reading along here.  So many familiar things. 

And, Hops.....focusing on new connections proactively to determine what, exactly, is there.....
Assess
accept
Act

Yes.

People come into our lives with their baggage, needs and projections.  We aren't obligated to BE or GIVE what we can't.

Allowing them to try, while avoiding the truth, is a recipe for awkward patterns.

We choose where to file people in our hearts and lives.  Some people don't have any place.

I struggle with handling people, esp type As and vulnerable people asking to be healed.

Eventually they become bossy and controlling....like the recovering cowboy neughbor.  That happened with a male friend....he phoned today, after rarely ever calling since getting a gf.

THAT friend complained I was very " curt" when we first began interacting.  I suppose I was, bc I was fighting the custody case...no time for anything else.

Eventually he was calling me every day for advice and to vent, seek compassion while taking zero advice for years. He NEVER asked about me or listened if I tried to take a turn.  Ever.

It was like a banned poster here once.  Never changing, but super hooked into sharing every detail of her repeated upset and trauma, which I get....been there, myself in ways.  We all have.

My point is, I'm drawn into relationships like that too.  It's a pattern.  Eventually treated badly, for what I perceived as my being nice and extending kindness feeeeels so very wrong. Unfair.  Unjust.  Expectations are everything, imo.  Unspoken agreements create huge discord, IME.

And that treatment comes in many forms....The poster on the board mounted a false campaign against me here, postured as victim and dragged newbie posters into board hostilities ( which was THE most upsetting aspect!)....and it was a real learning experience.  I was, unfortunately, limited in my ability to SEE everything going on....my part in the situation most especially.  I had a part.

CB eventually discussed it on the board and was heard and understood, where I had failed.

So interesting, but also confusing.  A repeating theme is my inability to discuss difficult/ toxic/pdpeople....or are they just people locked in trauma and pain and problematic coping strategies
we
allow
in?
 We involve ourselves with?  Project onto them what we want to see?

And there's the rub.  We play a part in who we let in, except in FOO situations, of course.

To discern proactively, accept our opinions and act in our best interest, despite awkwardness/discomfort/retaliation, etc. isn't natural.  There are blind spots and what feels like a block.....but is it our comfort in dealing with these kinds of relationships?

What about us is, if anything, could seem off kilter for people capable of interdependent relationships?  (Thanks for that term Amber.)

Just say'in.  There are patterns.  I'm repeating things said on this thread, bc I want to understand and make changes too.


Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on March 18, 2021, 05:16:20 PM
You're right, CB, she could have all kinds of personal reasons to prefer not to discuss her illness, even with someone she's labeled her closest friend. I get that and made it clear to her that I completely respect her right to guard her own disclosures. (I used to discuss a few personal things with her that I later learned she'd shared in uncomfortable detail with her husband and laughed about, because she'd shared that thinking it was funny, so I need boundaries too.)

I think what bothered me was her implication that it wasn't her issue, but because I am "too open" -- a whiff of judging me or, as my T said, basically implying I'm a gossip. Which isn't accurate or fair.

The bottom line is that I will respect her boundaries without question, while at the same time not blame myself for the inner voice that's saying, something about her/this is problematic (for me). So, I'm okay with it now. Just have adjusted my distance and decided that I do not want to be manipulated or guilted, which has in the past been her M.O. when she's feeling vulnerable.

Some folks react to vulnerability by closing down, others lay it on others and blame them...but ultimately I think it's just that how we react to pain or fear is extremely individual. Takes a while to learn the contours of another personality -- and in my case, especially with those who are highly executive and cerebral, less open.

I understand she's expressing her own inner stuff. I just have realized that I feel fairly wary about her, and feeling dominated has been significant. Don't need that. I'll continue to care and be supportive. Just more carefully.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on March 18, 2021, 05:34:22 PM
I don't know for sure, Lighter, what I'm unconsciously doing. But I do have faith that with this perceptive T, I'm gradually finding out.

Short of labels (PD, codependent), off the top of my head what comes are just some honest adjectives: I'm quite lonely so attention from a new friend who kind of "claims" me in a dominating way feels comforting. Especially a new female friend. (I've yearned my whole life for a kind sister.) So my discernment is often pretty late to the party.

What's new for me is realizing I can do better, recognize stuff in myself or others earlier that might lead to unhealthy attachments. I'm not sure, but feel as though I'm entering a stage of life where I might do better at that.

Wounded people can attract wounded people. I don't mind that because I think they also can heal each other.

I'm not perfectly healthy or balanced so neither are all the people in my life. I'm okay with that too. In some ways, people who wear some wounds feel safer to me than those who appear almost flawless or aggressively "normal." There's the poet thing too -- outliers by nature.

Insanity is a sane response to living in an insane culture, is an exaggerated thing I've heard before, that always made sense to me.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on March 19, 2021, 10:19:09 AM
HUH... what CB said - about having sisters in our FOO background might be some sort of key here, to unlocking a deeper bit of buried treasure. (Running off to ponder, research & play with another new idea/concept....)

:D

My friend Deb - has been exceptionally busy taking care of her ailing mom. I've given her space this last year; not making demands on her time - but just set up a lunch date for next week. Her schedule has to be brutal between full time care of her mom (she has LPN training; and has recently added hospice help) and her full time job. Due to Covid, her office has been halved and people work alternating weeks - that's been helpful to her at this time.

Hol's friend M, who lost her partner last year (Hol's boss) - has been rejecting a lot of Hol's invitations, requests to chat, etc. Hol is giving her space... and starting to have difficulty with it...but I'm starting to question if that compassionate instinct is the opposite of M wants/needs.... I'll run that past Hol. Perception can get in the way of understanding, sometimes. M is spending lots of time with others in that same group of friends.

It's my longstanding friend (50+ yrs now!) V, that was very much like my sister back in school. We're both strong personalities - and have kinda lived our lives with the other as a mirroring friend. And very distant now, too. For a long time. We don't talk often to each other. But when we DO... we chatter on just like we're still that close. She called once when B was here. LOL. Odd synchronicity... but we still babbled for an hour. It works for us.

In both of my friendships, I don't ask for much; often. But, both of them were there for me in a big way when Mike died, without a lot of prompting. And vice versa, when they needed. We can, at times, operate on the intimate level. (and that might be part of what Hol is missing right now, too). My friendships with guys are a whole different animal. I've had guy friends - no romance component at all - since grade school.

Maybe that's the key to these friendships, just finding what works well enough for both of you? And maybe that doesn't get agreed on until a certain level of intimacy/vulnerability exists and has been tested & trusted? I'm probably the least experienced in this area of our little group here. So I'm just brainstorming from what I think I understand.

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on March 19, 2021, 11:31:25 AM
You are going through accelerated learning, Hops!  Wow, that is so good to read.  And it doesn't sound (from what you have written) that the revelations are feeling terribly painful?  It sounds as if the learning isn't tearing huge holes in your heart, which is a good thing.  We all know what it can feel like to suddenly realise a painful truth and how bad that can be.  I'm so pleased for you, and hope that the silly comment your friend made about you gossiping (I can't imagine anyone less likely to gossip, to be honest) isn't taking up space in your head.

A couple of things struck me as I was reading through the posts.  One was what Skep just mentioned, about friendships needing to be whatever it is you need them to be, and the true nature of them not really being known until some tough patches have been negotiated (I'm paraphrasing, but towards the end of Skep's last post).  I do think that's very true.  I've had some wonderful friends over the years who vanished as soon as things got tough for me.  They just couldn't cope, but if the situation with my son hadn't developed I'm quite sure I'd still be very good friends with them now.  I think sometimes you don't really know how people will be until a tough situation comes along, whether it's on their side or yours.

The other thing I've noticed in myself, and I wondered whether it has any truth in it for you as well, is that I don't really feel it's okay for me to not like someone or want to hang out with them if they're being nice to me, especially if they offer to do things for me.  I kind of feel (and I know it's silly) that I only have the right to not want to spend time with someone if they've done something awful.  I feel like I need to justify it to myself.  I've noticed it because someone I've not heard from in ages turned up one day last week and I pretended to be out, and now I'm putting off phoning her (she put a note through the door).  We used to be friends but I just don't feel it any more and I don't feel like I want to put any time in to the situation with her.  Yet I feel I ought to, because she came round and put a note through the door.  So I've been working myself into a tizzy justifying my reaction to myself (I mean talk about creating work for myself - why can't I just not bother and not give a crap??!).  But I realised that just not wanting to is perfectly okay, it's just that I'm not wired to think that way, if that makes sense.  Anyway, I only thought I'd mention it in case it rang a bell with you :) 
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on March 19, 2021, 12:40:30 PM
Sooooo helpful, and so interesting, all.

Skep, I think V is very lucky and vice versa -- it sounds like a fantastic friendship. I also think it's lucky that you bond so comfortably with men and have that whole other universe of energy and building focus with many. You really do know who you are and what makes you happy. That's a big piece of all this too, not focusing on judging yourself or others, just getting on with what you enjoy and has value for you, for your unique life, your own individual interests, etc.

Sounds super healthy to me.

Tupp, it might've been on your home thread, but I really perked up when you talked about boundaries, and the intense discomfort you feel about setting them.

I think that's a key reminder for me too. If I don't SPEAK how I feel and what I want/need (using "I statements") then I live in uncertainty and anxiety. As I do learn to speak up more and more confidently, I lose some people's interest but others who don't take things personally just accept and it doesn't always break a connection, it can sometimes strengthen one.

The other thing is when I SPEAK, it's not always going to be about a negative (I need to NOT be asked this or not listened to or not called or whatever) ... it can be about a positive. E.g., I'm finding I want to spend more energy on what works or could work. I'm really enjoying some creative ideas about ____, I'm eager to have a good walk more regularly, want to join on Wednesdays?, etc whatever.

I've sometimes tied myself in knots trying to manage another person's emotions as well as my own. I'm not doing that anywhere near as often any more. I don't any longer believe I can change how other people feel. I can witness it with compassion (or boredom, sometimes) -- but I don't have to fix it. The sun will still rise.

It's a biggie, because like you, I spent years wanting to help so much that I'd exhaust myself. And that was a boundary violation in itself, because I hadn't set appropriate boundaries around MYSELF. My focus needed to shift from the other to myself. The person I'm most responsible to. The person who most needs to hear me and be kind and calm.

If I SPEAK on my own behalf, kindly and calmly, then whatever another person does with that information isn't mine to worry about. I'll get some disappointing responses, some kind ones, some neutral ones, and on it goes. Info in, info out.

Maybe self-talk is really the core thing. For those who've been abused, abandoned or harmed early on, someone else's voice once drowned out our own. But as we continue to heal and grow, maybe we'll start to hear our own voices as the kind and calm, trustworthy true north.

Other people can understand or not, approve or not, help or not. But nobody else can deafen us to our own voices. We just have to listen to ourselves, and trust ourselves. Somehow, we each know who we are and what our stories mean and what we want to reach for. Information overload, especially judgemental information, isn't helping. I believe our own kind, calm inner voices will.

(Pretty obvious I've made myself a new mantra, huh: kind and calm. I'm liking that today!)

hugs
Hops

PS Random afterthought:
We don't have to earn our own love. It's inside. We can listen to it. Changes all.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on March 19, 2021, 04:46:27 PM
YES, CB!

Reciprocity is a golden mean for me.

Not 50-50, that's unattainable.

But feeling there's an adequate/good-enough balance of mutual awareness, mutual recognition, mutual respect for the other's life (time, plans, stresses, needs).

Whatever percentage someone needs, is what it is. Hopefully we'll all get new chances to discover new relationships where all that is possible. Friendships or otherwise.

I am sad that M couldn't adapt to your (very reasonable) needs but so admiring that your love for each other never got destroyed over it.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on March 19, 2021, 10:14:03 PM
Whoo. Just went back to read the article you posted, CB.
No WONDER M and I struggle/d so hard!
He's always said he interrupts because he's enthusiastic and engaged (might be cultural), and I always felt disrespected and dominated. And at times I was.

And we BOTH obviously have ADD (with an H for him I think)...so:

"....It can also be common among people with ADHD or other neurodivergences."

And I'm the person who had to train herself not to interrupt in work meetings by writing NB at the base of my thumb as a reminder ("No Blurting"). Oy.

I'm glad I read that. I don't think M and I could ever find a balance since it's intense on both sides -- his desperation to talk and interrupt, mine to be heard and not cut off (in part also due to ADD, because when he does it over and over--"overlapping" I guess--I completely lose my train of thought and it's so difficult to get a thought all the way out that I just give up communicating).

But now that our relationship is different, I am more content with mostly listening to him because I have nothing big at stake if he doesn't listen to me enough to understand. I have less invested in being understood by him. I can feel affection and enjoy some time with him, without hoping for more.

So so so complicated, we is. Thanks for the article, CB.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on March 20, 2021, 09:10:35 AM
I recognized Hol & I in that definition of communication style, too. I'm like Hops, in that I often completely lose my idea, what I wanted to say - while Hol's insisting on talking over me. But I CAN reverse the process; been practicing for a long time... and I've found she really doesn't like it when she's on the receiving end. :D

Even if I ask: please just listen & let me talk before you feedback... she can't. LOLOLOLOLOL.

I talk very slowly - because I'm thinking/feeling simultaneously and having to make it coherent & verbally meaningful - all at the same time. In conversation there's no chance for me to pre- prepare my "statement" - LOL - because I'm actually listening and paying attention; concentrating -- not talking to myself while someone else is talking.

Hence why I'm so much more comfortable with a keyboard to express myself! ;)
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on March 20, 2021, 01:16:39 PM
Me too, Amber....that's a near-exact description of how it works for me.
Except I sometimes talk rapidly, big rush of narrative and detail.

Which no doubt makes listening to me a challenge!

I've been working on slowing it all down (the "calm" part).
I think intentionally slowing my speech would be a good experiment.

hugs
Hops

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on March 20, 2021, 03:43:59 PM
I never read Chapman's book,
The 5 Languages of Love, but I'm Googling them now.

Words of affirmation
Physical touch
Quality time
Receiving gifts
Acts of service

Lots of ways to get wires crossed and misunderstand, ime.

Lighter



Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on March 20, 2021, 04:27:47 PM
No kiddin', Lighter.
How could anyone get straight As in all those?

Although sometimes it's wise, I find that more often than not, pop-psychology books with new "systems" for analysing oneself or others fall fairly flat for me.

Not so the DSM description of NPD, which I found uncanny the first time I read it. How DID they meet my mother? Husband/lover/boyfriend/boss.........all those living magnets for me.

That said, I do like thinking about those categories of expressing love. It's not the door but certainly a helpful window. I wonder if we could apply them to loving ourselves, too?

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on March 21, 2021, 09:24:19 AM
I kinda like the suggestions for "love language" as a starting point for thinking about such things and appreciation for how we're all different. As long as someone doesn't turn them into criteria - must haves - or performance measurements.

B is excellent at proactively taking care of equipment, things around the house & farm, making things. I make him food, help with his health issues, and give him a lot of positive feedback - arguing him out of some of his negative self-talk (brought on by the same kind of low vibe relationships I've had). He boosts & encourages me too.

Sounds titillatingly romantic, right? the swooning Jamie Fraser stuff? (or Murtagh, IMO) But the stereotypical romance stuff loses it's shine over time - and it's precisely this kind of language that is the meaningful meat & potatoes of a relationship. That endures.

I guess I'm using food metaphors because of an old Amish saying: "Kissin' don't last; cookin do".
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on March 21, 2021, 10:45:29 PM
(I better learn how to cook....) LOL

I'm randoming sharing stuff, let me know if quotes get irritating, but I enjoyed this one. A guy named Robert in Atlanta made this comment on an amazing essay about heroic female resistance fighters in Poland during WWII:

Don’t know about you, but the toughest people I know are tough women, not tough men. 

Most men are snowflakes pretending to be tough.

Most women are armored and pretending to be soft and stupid.

Women, like other oppressed people also learn young about masks and disguise.

All makes sense.

Anonymous charity and heroism has a special place in the rule book of life. True heroes are rarely known.


I'd like to find a Robert, but more realistically, I'm looking for Mr. Rogers. (Different kind of hero....)

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on March 22, 2021, 06:38:21 AM
Nodding, Hopsie, and I've always thought there's something heroic about getting dinner on the table every night, making a cup of tea for someone just because you know they'd like it, sitting up with a pet through the night when they're poorly, you know?  So many ordinary things that people do that have a big impact on someone else.  I like that.  And yes to tough women, and I do want to see a time when men being kind, sensitive and gentle isn't met with derision in some quarters.  You know what I mean.  So many silly societal ideals, who came up with all this stuff??!  Lol xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on March 22, 2021, 08:41:19 AM
Well - man or woman - I think as we grow into complete selves we actually become both. Tough women who will keep rocking the colicky babe all night - work right alongside her man during the day - and keep a vase of flowers, wild or otherwise - to look at. Sometimes, we're more one side than the other - but that keeps things interesting, IMO.

I build stuff too; dig; have learned to use equipment... and am finally up to 4-6 hrs of "work" a day, before exhaustion kicks in. I can swing a 20 lb sledgehammer effectively. And dinner? That's why I have two crockpots.

:D
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on March 22, 2021, 10:16:29 PM
I remember when the Sikh would start opining a little about the nature of men and the nature of women and I was so averse to stereotyping that I'd squirm. But I valued him so much that I let it go. I knew he meant it in a profound and not diminishing way.

I've figured out who my ideal man is now: a CROSS between Mr. Rogers and Carl Reiner.

Drawing on public figures is helpful since nobody knows other people in common.

I'm looking forward to re-writing my online dating profile! I'm actually going to say it. So if somebody's deeply kind and humanitarian and also very intelligent and funny...hope I'll find him. It's just amazing how many humorless people think they're hilarious. (I sound like an old crank, get off my lawn!)

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on March 23, 2021, 09:01:01 AM
Cheers to old cranks, Hops!!

It is my firm belief (no matter the validity of it) that after a certain age, we're allowed to be cranky. Look at all the years:

- we put up & shut up for a paycheck
- we kept the peace by yielding our druthers
- the world changed and not necessarily to the good; but to cover all that I'd need to publish volumes of essays (rants)

The work I keep taking on, physically, wears me out enough it's not even worth ranting. Feed me, put one of the Purr-doctors on my lap, hand me a bourbon (liquid ibuprofen) and I'll be quiet - except maybe for the snoring.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!

"Wanted: compatibly cranky old man with the ability to laugh at himself and the absurdity of life who is interested in all the things we didn't have time to do when we were raising families - and me."

That's a fair personal ad, isn't it????   :D
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on March 23, 2021, 09:16:58 AM
Very good one, Tupp!
(I"m taking notes.....) Plus--

Optionals:
Hair
Teeth
Fabio
Fat wallet

Essentials:
Humor
IQ/education
Empathy
Responsibility

Simple enough. Keep the line moving!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on April 02, 2021, 01:10:56 PM
Verrrry slowly and gently, getting ready to "get out there" with online dating again.
Do not want to rush it or flood myself with stress (even though fun, it's stressful).
Have had a few simple correspondences, but always find myself pushing it off or inserting delays or caveats (fully vaccinated is a reasonable one, but I'm a little odd in that I have zero interest in online chat or correspondence before we've met). So I'm somewhat ambivalent. Might be that I am adapting to life alone and just ... wondering. How important is The Duo Dream to me still? Or am I giving up?

Open to the answers as they slooooowly form. Not pushing it. Focusing more on my health and my own therapy/healing/un-depressing progress. Exercise plan starting.

Still seeing M about once a week, checking in (he usually initiates) almost daily. He's been agitated and depressed, even mentioned he no longer enjoys cooking, a big change. So I offered to spend Easter afternoon, and he's instantly happy again. Didn't get a fancy reservation but is cheered about spending time I think.

He has a lot of lecture-travel coming--Russia in Sept, a in France, then Madrid in spring. Each time he'll be with people and busy busy (and happy with the stimulation) but even though he's not gone on about it, I think he's sad to go alone.

I feel I'm seeing him more clearly AND compassionately now that I have fully released the fantasy of The Dream being possible with him. And that's a relief.

Just an update...
hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on April 03, 2021, 05:23:06 AM
Good update to read, Hopsie.  I think there are some similarities in our situations, in the sense that I think it's maybe a wise path to work on the present (health, social life, maybe some dates) whilst keeping what you'd like ideally in mind, and at the same time settling in to a rhythm that will work if a serious romance doesn't come along at the right time. You sound like you're taking a balanced approach to it all.  I'm glad to read that the situation with M is less intense, and for what it's worth I don't think it's odd not to spend hours chatting with people online when you can't meet them.  I've found online interaction can be misleading.  I think it's sensible to wait until you can get together.  I think you need to be able to look into a person's eyes, you know?  Looking forward to hearing more along the way, though :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on April 03, 2021, 10:06:42 AM
Hmmm. Online chatting, obviously, can be quite deceptive - behind the screen could be the antithesis of what the person is claiming. It's a real thing. It happens even in face to face interactions. I'd say do what you're comfortable with, because if the random Mr. Possible can't even accommodate that wish, then you're sorting out the "nopes" faster.

B & I were different; the exception to that? I dunno. Hol still has reservations about this - but I point out her track record with the face to face "getting to know you" and various "deceptions" that were usually rooted in the partner not really being honest with themselves about who/what they were. Or her attempts to make something work despite the obstacles.

I think it was different, because both B & I are the "what you see is what you get" types. No hidden agendas. And neither of us started out TRYING to establish a relationship. The years of chatting online gave the "essential data" about our lives & who we were (or thought we were). The occasional phone call, allowed for more intuitive "knowing" who the other is; not completely - but definitely more spontaneously real. The friend zone was a much easier starting point for both of us. Meeting him the first time - was a bit of a shock; the "inner B" is just as canny & forceful & strong as he ever was... and physically, the years of physical impact on him looked as if they'd broken him.

Then, after the all night road trip (he didn't drive)... he started to unload tools and get to work. Now, I'm an overly visually-oriented person - and on that wavelength, I can sense a lot of OTHER types of things too. He opted to be totally in his element as he took in my place, me, Hol & S, etc. Neither he or I open up much to new people, until we have some sense of who they are. I might be a little more open about data about myself - which even Hol says, I need to restrain. LOL. But because we took our time with the "talking about ourselves" and inquiring about each other part of it - activities are a good thing for us - that well-protected, and consciously hidden switch - clicked all on it's own.

If I'd met him first, I might only have seen the toll of combat & medical "treatment" - and not bothered to dive any deeper. I wasn't looking to be a caregiver again; or put myself in a position to ease someone else to the other "side". Not what I wanted at ALL. Through the online environment, I saw how he raised his D; how he treated other women on the forum; how he interacted with other people who weren't entirely "functional" as human beings. But then, discussion forums are more like the local pub where people talk, get to know each other in a group (usually moderated) setting. And that's helpful for seeing "who the person is" -- when they're not directly engaging with oneself. The "tells" show up better sometimes this way. I think, anyway.

If the dating site, has a group discussion... it might be better to use that instead of initiating one to one communications in depth immediately. As another option, if meeting face to face is difficult. But then, I'm an avowed people watcher; observer. Especially online. I usually read quite a bit of a certain person's talking & thought process before I engage in any of their threads. On any topic!
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on April 03, 2021, 12:32:42 PM
I think you and B did GREAT, Amber. It was gradual, began in friendship, and included all those small moments/info bits that one day added up to a new realization. Nothing whatsoever wrong with your online roots, either.

In my case, my goal is to avoid making any sort of project out of finding someone. Other than a desultory and relaxed approach to the coffee-date kind of intro the site facilitates, I'm not drilling deeper or trying to read more into anything much. I'm pretty good at written red flag detection, so that weeds out a lot of people. And it's fine with me.

I'm almost at a place where "never" might become as good an outcome as "finding him." Almost. Still have The Dream but I've turned the heat down to such a slow simmer that it might just turn out to be a pleasant fantasy that led to a couple new friendships and nothing more. Either way, I want to radically release the outcome, as much as I can. I do know it won't be because I master anything other than myself.

No group chat on that site and I just do not want to bond online before meeting. Full stop. (I do totally Google unashamed for whatever public info might turn up. But that's it.) So those patient enough to accept that quirk and arrange an actual meet, great. Those not that patient aren't for me. And Mr. Rogers is transparent and pretty darn guileless. Reiner makes me laugh and is in love with humanity. I'm liking those depictions of what will help me drop my guard and, if I'm lucky, find somebody to love AND live with. If it doesn't happen, I want to pre-emptively make my peace with that too.

Feel like I'm making big progress, and wanting more to focus on myself than somebody theoretical.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on April 03, 2021, 12:36:40 PM
"wanting more to focus on myself than somebody theoretical"


Hopsie, I think that's the bit, in a nutshell.  Exactly that. xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on April 03, 2021, 02:17:27 PM
Thanks, (((((Tupp))))).

I actually learned a lot from the struggles and disillusionments with M. He's still human as am I, and so far, I'm okay with just-friends.

Now, I'm looking for new just-friends. No pre-written agenda. No room for it.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on April 04, 2021, 05:01:52 AM
I think the learning's always good, Hopsie, it's just difficult when the lessons are so painful.  And yes, we're all human, with our hang ups and habits and not so good bits alongside the bits that make us lovely :)  Just not always easy to find someone that matches and I think it is natural to guard your heart more closely when you've been hurt in the past, and that tends to make us a bit more cautious (which I think sometimes is a good thing; it does mean your spidey senses prick up at small things and I think it's good that we take notice of those.  And I should say that when I say 'your' I don't mean you specifically, just anyone who's already had to nurse a broken heart :) ).  I am looking forward to hearing more about new just friends when they come along :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on April 04, 2021, 10:45:18 AM
Focusing on one's self - and making necessary updates in one's perspective, maybe habits, and general well-being is my new advice to anyone between relationships for whatever reason.

It's the best investment of time & energy anyone can make, IMO. I'm still practicing that, even with the promise from B that the time till arrival & staying is getting very short. Keeping myself grounded in what works for me makes it easier, I think, to make the transition in a clear & honest way.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on May 23, 2021, 04:22:19 PM
Ola,
I'm realizing that about 8 months after dropping the hammer on M (no more lifetime dream, but friendship) I'm STILL processing what I let go of. The Dream.

I'm okay, first off. But it's a bunch of layers of stuff/crap. One is, he spent a week in CA with his wonderful, welcoming, adorable, lovely and loving family including grandbabies who had treated me like the Visiting Angel. I lost them (that part of The Dream) when I said No More to him. I accept that. Price of admission.

I still know I did the right thing. Biiiig difference between the fairytale sold to the family (and to me) versus the reality of being unheard and disregarded in the various ways he'd do that, with which I could not/would not cope long term. Okay. No demonizing. But a deeeeeep disappointment. Even though I was the one to (I believe) wake up and realize he wouldn't/couldn't ACTUALLY build a shared life with me (or perhaps any non-subservient woman), versus his wooing hyperbole about it/me....it's still a loss.

Other is, he's had a cardiac thing surface and has to have a procedure for it which will work, but brings all of it into fuller awareness all of a sudden. Virtually all our conversations are about Him, and how He is doing, and what He is concerned about, and keeping Him company when he wants diversion, and being available to Him when he wants to process it aloud.

Wow. That's pretty frontal.

Anyway, my current M-goal is to TRYYYYY (and what's embarrassing is how hard it is) to think about him less.

It's ridiculously difficult. My co-D programming was so deep, more than I knew. So that's a thing I'm working on at the moment. Fortunately my sweet T is really good at cheering on my moments of clarity and standing-on-own-emotional-feet. I just wish they were more frequent.

Thassall I can articulate just now.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on May 24, 2021, 09:41:57 AM
I fail to see why you have give up the dream and pursuing it with someone else. It's YOUR DREAM and not dependent on M; who is obsessed with HIS DREAM - which isn't compatible with yours and y'all didn't get to the point of OUR DREAM.

Forgive me for being blunt. There are several things I'm being completely ruthless with myself about right now. Having a long quiet check-in on some things with me. (Not that's it's peaceful.)
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on May 24, 2021, 03:28:00 PM
Nothing to forgive, Amber!

I haven't given up on my dream, am just discouraged (not tragically but truthfully) at the present moment. It may be a post-quarantine phenom, but I'm getting nearly zero messages on the same site I met M on. Yet, I'm not going to spend hours and hours looking online, either.

I've decided for now I'm going to relax, wait until some medical stuff (appts) is all behind me, and then maybe take up the crusade again in late summer or fall. Right now I don't have the energy or focus for it.

And you were exactly right. We never got to OUR dream. My fatal error (which I've done before) was believing that because somebody says something (or a lot of things) they actually mean it and will follow through ... AND ... believing that just because I can imagine it, that means it's doable.

Not everything is. And that's not all M's fault. I got very invested and was willing to even give up my beloved house since he didn't want to, but his attitude toward finding a new home for us both OR making real space in his for me...showed me it's not doable with him, really. I just wish it hadn't taken nearly 2 years to sink into my thick skull.

I have plenty that's positive to focus on right now. Just want to think about him less. Writing so often about M here probably makes it look as though I've made no progress at all in processing/releasing the whole thing, but I have.

Thanks for all the patient listening. (My garden helper was trying to explain something to me and I made her repeat it three times...) it might just be how I think. Aloud, repetitively and for an inordinate amount of time.

But I'm still trainable!

I'm sorry to hear you're under the (your own) microscope for something hard right now. Hope it's not bad news or a hard wakeup.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on May 24, 2021, 06:53:13 PM
For whatever reason, I think I just woke up this morning - very GRUMPY.

LOLOL. I'm better now.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on May 24, 2021, 10:32:44 PM
Hops:

You  aren't jus trainable. 

You know more about yourself, what you want and what you don't want.

I'm sorry M wasn't what you needed him to be.  You'll see the red flags earlier next time.  You'll know them when you see them.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on May 25, 2021, 12:33:42 PM
Thanks, ((((Lighter)))). I think you're right.

I don't remember if I told y'all this on another thread, but I felt good about a decision I made recently to not have a second date with a smart, rich, accomplished, powerful man I had an enjoyable first date with about a month ago.

Pink flags were him saying "I hate that woman" about his first wife (mother of his children, I gathered theirs was a toxic, money-slaughter divorce) and also his telling me, "I WILL teach you to dance!" after explaining how much he enjoyed it. I thought it over and cancelled our next meet (dinner downtown). I didn't dislike or recoil from him, but figured not asking me whether I'd like to learn the dancing, plus saying that about his first wife to a woman he didn't know...were clear enough.

Not about judging him for either...just about not wanting to take on another powerful, entitled man who isn't tuned into the subtler stuff that spells respect, imo.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on May 25, 2021, 05:07:11 PM
Aw, Hopsie.  This bit really stuck out for me:

My fatal error (which I've done before) was believing that because somebody says something (or a lot of things) they actually mean it and will follow through ... AND ... believing that just because I can imagine it, that means it's doable.

I think we should all be able to believe that people say what they mean and will do what they say!  And I think it's so sad that so many people don't.  I think some people mean it when they say it - but not to the extent that they will actually do it.  And some will say it because they think it will get you doing what they want you to do, which I think is really sad.  I don't want to be someone who is always suspicious but equally it's hard to guard your heart if you take everything at face value.  I think it's sad.

And I think believing that things are doable is so natural when you're a fixer/carer/giver etc.  Effort = anything is possible.  It's hard to go against that, especially when you can see how good something can be, if only doofus could stop talking for five minutes every now and again.

I also think that the prospect of family - all those lovely relatives and grandbabies - who wouldn't want that? - is so appealing, and it's hard to let go of that part of it as well.  You're doing well.  You'll get there - I think a time will come when M becomes 'm' - you know?
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on May 26, 2021, 05:39:02 PM
Quote
believing that things are doable is so natural when you're a fixer/carer/giver etc.  Effort = anything is possible.

This was very helpful, Tupp -- thanks mucho. It is a great synopsis of delusion and for that matter, a lot of other stuff that drains energy from personal goals and the ability to be in the present and be content.

Just had a visit from M that was fun and interesting but one-way, as ever. And I was okay with it. He ("m") was just being himself and the diversion of his narrative (about himself) was nice and also not significant. If he can welcome me as a diversion/distraction now and then, I can view him the same way. Nothing more. Surprised that particular framing never occurred to me before.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on July 18, 2021, 09:38:00 AM
Interesting that I believed this in May:
Quote
If he can welcome me as a diversion/distraction now and then, I can view him the same way.


It's been about a year since I "broke up" with M, and gradually, partly due to being pandemic pod buddies (which really was a sanity-saver at the time), the pattern has gradually inched back into what it was when we were committed romantic partners during a busy (for him) period: dinner once or twice a week, very superficial emails and, when we do see each other...M's compulsive nonstop, silences-are-forbidden, talking. (Amped up lately since he senses me pulling back.)

He's being doing great, professionally. He has thrived on the solitude and been incredibly productive. He has professional trips coming up and many others. He had and weathered a significant health crisis, has lost 50 pounds, looks great and is feeling better. And he appears completely content with the new "friendship" we've been doing.

But I've gradually built up to a reckoning with myself about it. I'm not content. Recently my grief-processing came up to the surface when his two sons each visited for a week. M. immediately planned dinners to include me and I loved seeing them. I had instantly loved them when I met them because: 1) they're terrific young men with lovely families and 2) knowing them and how much they liked me back, ignited my yearning to be part of a family. They were ready. I was ready. M is not.

M is ready to have me be his long-running, ongoing best friend and first companion. His helper and supporter and listener. But nothing's changed from when it hit the fan for me: He doesn't want to make any changes, make a home together, or commit to anything that would require him to downsize, move, make real space for me in his house, etc. He painted two spare bedrooms and when asked about the main living space (Q: How would you make room for me to have some favorite pieces in the main areas? A: "I don't want to change anything." He means it.)

Yet the COMFORT of staying so connected to him has been real and I settled into it.
Lately, I'm a lot less settled. I notice his patterns of conversation:
1) If I'm feeling down or withdrawn he ups the ante with ever-more-frantic talk. The moment he sees me it starts pouring out, and it's always always always the same:
--food
--his work (little history lessons)
--politics
--Covid

That's it. We never, ever, ever talk about anything personal or that I find personally meaningful or intimate. It's not a surprise -- his defenses against vulnerability are enormous and were part of the reason our relationship failed. His compulsions, too. Our future (or a genuinely shared, with some depth future) was blocked, imo.

The other reason I'm reconsidering now is that his sons reminded me of the grief. I've been sad ever since they left. M also acted so strange at those fancy dinners out -- praising me gushingly in front of his sons, beaming at me, and behaving as though I were still his full life partner or fiance. It was awkward, because that's not just "friendship." I found myself just thinking, why am I going along with a charade of real commitment and intimacy, when it's not what we are?

The answer was a mix of loneliness, pandemic podding, and hoping that I could enjoy that connection long-term (I'd adjusted, I thought) without harm to myself.

Now, I'm not so sure. I've been irritable with him lately, everything he goes on about bores me, his narcissism shows up in small and large ways all the time, etc.

He just told me that his sister is coming from Costa Rica and of course he wants me to join them for Thanksgiving. Thanksgiving! I felt sort of locked-down in "devoted companion to trot out for family" mode and last night, wrote him that actually, being around his family is quite painful for me, as it reminds me of my loss of the big dream and future hopes. And that though I still care for him, we're not what we were, and I can't pretend it any longer. His "place in my heart" will endure, but I'm working at facing my future as it most likely will be.

I've been back on the dating site and though action there is very slow, I'll stick with it. I have no sense that I will definitely find what I've yearned for and so at the same time that I remain open, I don't "expect" a certain outcome. In the meantime, it's better for me than sustaining my relationship needs on superficial talk, eating together occasionally, and that's it. It's just not enough, and it's almost like being handed half a glass of water when you have strong thirst. This glass isn't half-full for me, alas.

I've gotta fill up my own glass, one way or another. I dread the prospect of another Covid winter without relying on M, but I think it may be necessary to toughen me up and help me focus harder on my own life, world, friendships, and writing.

In my email to him I said, "Wish we could talk about deeper things sometime" but also that "It's okay." It is okay, in that I'm no longer imagining it would be any different with him. And given that I can't help being who I am any more than he can help being who he is (commanding, self-absorbed, money obsessed), that's the right -- or the real -- place I should be.

Working on it. Life brings challenge and change. I'm committed to my own mental and emotional health and returning to familiar steps. Therapy is good, church is there and I should re-engage, and writing calls.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on July 18, 2021, 11:00:20 AM
((((Hops))) acceptance is our friend.  What amazing work you're doing.

We're your pod too!

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on July 18, 2021, 11:22:34 AM
Thank you, Lighter.
The support, acceptance and ESPECIALLY the patience of this board has gotten me through it. There's nowhere else, not therapy, not IRL friendships, where I've been so able to "get it all out."

And while complaining about M's lacks this time, I note that I skipped over my own. Helpful to also face squarely (without self loathing) my own contributions:

--lifetime habit of falling into love-delusions because my imagination is so busy and eager to fill in my lonely spaces and relationship "adulting" is too hard
--dizzying CoD responsiveness to powerful personalities (which covers a craving to be taken care of, despite my independence)
--immense stubborness (from anxiety) about not fully letting go until I've beaten a dead horse into dogfood

I had a significant though pitiful memory the other day that I need to share with my T. When I was about 10 years old, I got to go to a sleep-away camp near another town. I was very excited. I'd had few friends and never knew how to bond with my peers (geeky, waaay sensitive, and incredibly lonely).

So when I got to camp and met everyone, I told them that although my name was Hops, everyone should call me "Honey" (sooo suthrun!) because that was my nickname. Kids rolled their eyes and I don't recall any doing it. (I was as out of step with peers there as at home). But one counselor, a young man, always looked at me directly and gently called me "Honey." The whole week.

It hit me the other day that I was truly affection starved. Though my Dad was very gentle as a personality and did offer me some cuddly closeness, he was very busy and tired. It was Nmom, I realize in retrospect, honestly never ever showed affection. She messed with me nonstop and I spent huge amounts of time with her. But her way of relating was just the nonstop talking AT me. Never with me. Her touch was brisk and efficient, but never tender.

I believe I was so affection starved that I made up a tender nickname because I had heard people -- whether someone's parent or a servant in their homes -- call them "Honey" in a warm, straight-from-the-heart (particularly maternal heart) voice.

I never heard that voice in my childhood. But I'd unconsciously felt it as a yearning, and so I declared the revealing nickname at camp. For one week, I imagined I'd be addressed as "Honey" (because strangers would believe me that everybody at home called me that) which would mean love.

Didn't work out that way (kids saw through it) but remembering, I am so grateful for that young counselor, who heard the yearning and was so kind in his response.

hugs,
Hops (no, don't need to be called "Honey" except on special occasions! LOL)
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 18, 2021, 11:51:55 AM
This all sounds good Hops. I've always admired how you've been able to compassionately unearth your feelings and accept the reality of situations. (Not to mention your ingenious way with words!)

Nothing indicates that you have to close the door on your dream. M might not be the right person to share that with - but clearly there are some of his attributes that looked promising and felt attractive. So, following the old "nothing risked, nothing gained"... you took a chance, put in the effort, and discovered there was some misperceptions/less than complete understandings. That takes bravery! And believing in yourself. Trusting yourself.

I'm a firm believer in "friendship first". And you did, as far I understand the chronology, take your time. I think you've come out the other side of that experience not just intact - but stronger. You have a better understanding now, of your standards and "need priorities" for the relationship you're dreaming about, I think.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on July 18, 2021, 12:01:54 PM
LOl, you knew I'd be sitting at my keyboard so wishing I could send any small comfort, ((Hopsy))

I'm so sad for your brave and creative little child's heart at camp.  So grateful for that attuned camp counselor who saw her/you and responded.

That's such important insight.  Seeing how childhood wounds play out through a lifetime is heartbreaking and such huge relief all mixed up with processing, overcoming and new choices becoming available with astonishing clarity, ime.  Sometimes pounding like a hammer..... it's so apparent.....old patterns seem so wrong.  New choices seem so obvious, ime

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on July 18, 2021, 12:04:16 PM
Thanks, Amber. That was so affirming.
I felt a lot better after reading your response.

I wrote this to M, and felt I was speaking clearly:

It's actually quite painful for me to be around
your family, as very much as I like them...it's emotional
and reminds me of the lost big dream and lost hopes.

Again, no blame; I'm not going there. It has been about
a year and I'm just trying to feel my way into my future as
it appears likely it will be.

It starts in the present and, for me, requires honesty and
openness. Otherwise, true closeness becomes a sham.
We both deserve better than that. Wish we could talk
about deeper things sometimes. But it's okay....your
place in my heart will always be!


Hugs and thanks,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on July 18, 2021, 12:07:23 PM
You HAVE sent comfort, Lighter!
And your understanding that the needy little kid was also "creative" really adds strength.

I feel lots better now.

As to new choices being so obvious. You're totally right, in the rational part of things.

I'm working on that! I'm half id, half poet, half lazy daydreamer, half deluded. But my rational half totally agrees with you.

That makes me two and a half...never did like math.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on July 18, 2021, 12:10:45 PM
Woo boy, Hops.

:: Hot tear rolls down L cheek::.

There's no room for new connection if we fill ourselves with other connections.  M will be fine. 

You have to be true to yourself.  M won't understand, unfortunately.  It's one reason he's not enough.

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on July 18, 2021, 12:12:39 PM
Thank you.

And thank you!

(And no tears for me, you're feeling enough grief for others at the mo'...I'll be fine!)

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on July 18, 2021, 12:36:03 PM
::offering young Hops mug of 🥦 soup::

I selected a round, lovely blue hand made mug and big round soup spoon for you.

Soup.

 No more tears.
Promise.

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on July 19, 2021, 06:07:29 AM
Did we establish whether Buck has a brother or cousin that we can organise an introduction with?  Aw, Hopsie, I do get the Covid partner thing and the need for connection, plus the long held dreams of love, being loved, being part of a family and so on.  I do get all of that, really.  But equally I'm still hoping that you meet some lovely bohemian poet or musician or someone like that, someone who looks at what's around him and sees beauty and joy and a sense of connection.  Rather than someone who needs to constantly impress and dominate, however politely or intelligently they do that.  Do they have dating sites for poets?  Or a 'match my Pooch' site, where the dogs get to choose who they hang out with :)  I'm hoping that he's out there somewhere for you and I hope he gets his bum into gear and shows up soon! xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 19, 2021, 09:00:32 PM
LOLOLOL. Tupp, I love how your mind works.

No, B has the same kind of FOO that we do. There isn't anyone he would vouch for, in the taking care of a relationship realm. He makes no grand claims for himself, either. He is what he is and it's been a struggle to be that. I understand. I don't have lofty expectations. Just simple ones. And he can do that. So, so far.... so good.

(It FEELS however, a lot better than that. There's kinda been a meeting of the minds about "life is what you make it" and since we're both "makers" after a fashion, it works.)
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on July 20, 2021, 12:02:33 AM
Thank you, ((((Tupp)))).
You have such a kind and wise imagination.
I loved this:
Quote
someone who looks at what's around him and sees beauty and joy and a sense of connection

That's EXACTLY what I need. So, I wonder what you'd think of the rich powerful former federal prosecutor who's now wooing me (online) and eager to hop on the train and come meet me? He's raving about my use of language, intelligence, and "pretty face" in some pics. I do find him interesting, because I find all sorts of life stories fascinating. That's part of my problem. Fascinating and exciting can rapidly get confused with appropriate. And then I start imagining something working when there's truthfully very little in common. The whole opposites attract thing gets me going in wrong directions in relationships. I need to look for simpler guys with wiser minds and warmer hearts.

Time for me to throw up my hands because rich powerful dominant men seem to like my profile? Oy. My guess is I'll shortly be backing away from another millionaire.

I love your bohemian gentle soul vision for me, and I strongly doubt he's that. But I'm willing to meet, once, and see. It's both hilarious and confusing. Maybe they've all been thrown in my path so I can practice my boundaries. (May need them with him, I sense. I don't want to be wooed like crazy. I want to be known.)

And get this: he's super intelligent, owns a significant business (provides financial intelligence/analysis to the government). And he's from Central America and speaks Spanish (entirely fluent in English).

Some odd overlaps with M, there. Funny. I feel a lot calmer about M since I got some more distance the other day.

hugs
Hops

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 20, 2021, 08:54:18 AM
It's hard to know the actual value of the contents of a book, by it's cover.

I kinda like your explanation of the kinds of guys being attracted to you; the one about a chance to practice boundaries. But give yourself SOME credit Hops... I think you're doing fine, given all the kinds of feelings (and then the danger of overthinking them) that happens when you're attracted to someone.

If someone had advertised that B could recite Shakespeare by memory, or speak Latin and several other languages - and have an excellent grasp of history, flora & fauna... well. That doesn't fit his "cover" at all.

I usually try to read the whole book, before giving a review. But there HAVE been some that I got a few chapters in and threw across the room because it was such dreck, executed poorly.

Maybe the analogy fits?
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on July 20, 2021, 10:15:04 AM
It totally fits, Amber.
I'm shakily deciding how I feel about stepping into the library.

I'd feel better in the children's section at the moment,
with the Caldecotts and Newberries.

I never knew there could be something such as TOO smart. :)

hugs
Hops



Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 20, 2021, 11:33:25 AM
I totally get it Hops. But dating isn't commitment, and you can always put that book back on the shelf. No harm, no foul. And I don't think it would be too forward (or risky) if there are a few more dates after the first meet - to just put your wishes for a warm, caring simple partnership on the table.

I wouldn't be impressed if a guy presented all his material accomplishments & toys to me, in curriculae vitae fashion and was a single billionaire... unless there was a warm, open, and easy to talk to man under it all (ie, he listens to me as much as he talks). I think I got the anti-materialism bug before I was 21. Other stuff matters waaaaaaaayyyyyyy more to me.

And even during the first meeting, it's a good idea to check in with yourself (powder your nose??) and get a take on how you FEEL around him. If there's an attraction, move on to whether it's his looks or personality - or little things he does to put you at ease. It would get my attention, if he didn't talk much about why you should fall at his feet helpless within proximity of his magnificence - and instead let you talk first. Watch how he watches you; IF he watches you. Does he make direct eye contact? Does he interrupt with sensitive, related questions or does he simply make a comment?

I'm not saying guys who fit that profile are all Ns, or as insecure emotionally as little boys... I'd dearly love to hope that some guys in that income class are actually real people, with real depth. But my expectations aren't great, in the odds department. Personally, just from a merely practical point of view, I wish you'd look for retired contractors or highly skilled tradesmen who are ALSO compatible with life outlooks and educated. I think there are more of those who've learned the life lessons required to grow emotionally.

But I might have a bias that's sticking out from under my skirt.....  LOLOLOLOL.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on July 20, 2021, 11:42:51 AM
What Amber said.

Yup yup yup.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on July 20, 2021, 12:36:47 PM
VERY helpful comments, Amber.
Thank you so much for this.

Yes. There are specific, nearly mechanical-emotional, things I can do in the present to check in on what's happening and continue using reason. Thanks for reminding me that I can:

Pause (in the ladies room if need be) to ask myself...
--what questions is he asking me?
--are we sharing time relatively equally?
--is it a struggle to get a chance to share?
--does he talk mostly about power and money subjects?
--what does he say about relationships, what he wants on a real level?
--does he seem mostly focused on sex or physicality?
--is he wedded to staying where he lives? (The Watergate) Would dual places work?
--is he looking for new experiences and perspectives, or a partner to continue what he is most familiar with? (power circles, big money, geopolitical finance)
--does he seem reflective about who he is personally, inner growth, any sort of insight and inner maturation?
--would his expectations of a partner include a lot of "show" socializing, with elegant dress and power-broker socializing?
--does he have a homey side?
--will he yield fully to the reality that my dog is the cutest and bow before her desire for belly rubs?

Aha. I'm ready now.

hugs,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on July 21, 2021, 06:17:40 AM
Well no-one could resist Pooch, Hopsie, so that one will be a given :)

Yes to everything Skep said.  T has been talking to me about values, knowing what my values are and then seeking/expecting those from other people (I have yet to put this into practise).  Maybe that's something to keep in mind?

There are always exceptions to the rule but in my humble experience people aren't usually rich, powerful, caring and sensitive.  I'm not suggesting that anyone wealthy can only be unkind, or that people on low incomes always have loving hearts, but I do think that the cut and thrust needed to achieve power and wealth in this crazy world we live in is generally only available to certain kinds of personalities.  I don't think gentle, bohemian "let's watch the clouds drift by" kind of people tend to chase power and wealth.  I'm also mindful of Lighter's mum telling her "you're not an apple waiting to be picked" (just because you mention him wooing you - are you contacting people or do they contact you?).  Maybe ask him about stuff that matters to you personally - who's his favourite poet?  Or artist or journalist or musician?  But you know, something that means something to you.  Maybe tell him about your poem that you won the prize for and see how he responds to that?  Particularly if poetry isn't something he's into - is he interested enough to want to know more, or does he say 'well done' and then immediately tell you about the award he got for the big contract blah blah blah? 

I do think you should mention to him that you have a friend in the UK who will come over and kick his arse if he causes you any problems as well :)  Lol.  I do think you need some shared interests to be happy with someone long term, even if it's just politics or being avid news listeners or something.  I agree with Skep very much about seeing how you feel - do you feel good or does he make you feel anxious, restless, hurried etc - consciously or not.  I add the caveat that I've not had so much as a date in ten years but other people's lives are always easier to deal with :)  I hope it's a fun date, whatever happens, and we want to hear all about it :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on July 21, 2021, 09:02:24 AM
Excellent insight, Tupp--thank you.

I do enjoy talking to him on the phone. The praise sounds sincere but it's also discomfiting. At least it's about my use of language and not just my face (although he also went on about that some). So weirdly reminiscent of M's bulldozer courting. Is this a Latin thing? And he sent me way too many pix of himself in multiple situations. I sent him about four.

Anyway, the whole first-date plan is put off for a few weeks until after he takes a trip with his grandson. I already told him I think we have little in common and I'm wary of opposites attract these days, but still look forward to meeting him because I know we'll have fun talking.

I'm just being honest and direct. He started suggesting a trip already and joking about the nicknames we'd use for each other and I said, too early to travel together and premature to come up with affectionate nicknames. He goes, of course you're right...but his fantasy train has left the station.

I'm definitely going to use those observations in the list of "ask myself" questions in the moment, plus these, Tupp.

As to whether a wealthy person can be kind...one example of that and probably a rare one, is my father. His family was wealthy but he was humble, kind and self-effacing. Perhaps not a typical example.

Anyhow, at least this guy, "C", pursued justice his whole career. He develope a mini media empire after leaving the law, but evidently it did a great deal to teach businesses, banks and governments how to avoid or track illegal funds.

It's a healthy diversion, so far. Probably good for me. Also could be going from the frying pan into the fire.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 21, 2021, 09:53:06 AM
I know it's a stereotype that the very wealthy (these days, that definition keeps changing quickly) have a drive that prioritizes ambition, work & accumulation & status symbols above all else. But I know for a fact, that it's a stereotype and there are people in that income class that are real human beings, with depth and thoughtfulness; kindness. I'm just a very very tiny fish in that fishbowl. And with recent economic downturn, I'm not sure I'm even in that category anymore. I just don't care as long as I've got plenty for Hol to take over.

But, the reason I mentioned to pay attention to how you feel - and it might be anything - was because your intuition lives there. You have excellent social cue intelligence too. The first time B was here - happily putting my Rubicon right as rain - I noticed that feeling of being completely at ease and "happy". He can talk while he works and I was asking some questions and occasionally holding things or helping because my hands are smaller. After we ate a buffet lunch, he mentioned how comfortable he was - eating around other people is a mild trigger for him but he didn't feel that with us, me in particular. I listened less to the words he said, as to how I FELT. And it really felt good. Easy. Comfortable. And as a result of the feeling - we both opened up to each other and could be vulnerable about things. That almost NEVER happens with me, being the guarded self-protective type. Nothing in the time since has contradicted that feeling. Given me pause.

Not that I recommend moving that fast ever. The whole next year was me second-guessing that feeling and trying to fit it into different kinds of "explanations" other than serendipity and compatibility. LOLOLOL. And it was a year till we were able to get together again. We both had our time to sort ourselves out without the pressure of physical attraction messing with our experience and common sense knowledge of ourselves and what we wanted from a relationship.

I think the timing's right Hops. Maybe not this guy; maybe. But the idea is it's supposed to be fun to try things on for size. I think you can be fully in charge of yourself and participate/engage in the meeting while taking care of yourself.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on July 21, 2021, 10:04:39 AM
Well, Hops.....

Here's to discerning between flitting diversion, deep connection and curiosity about what's really there. Or not.

Here's to dropping expectation and getting your toes wet without conditions and judgments about what might/should/could be there.

I hope you can drop all/any shame around asking for what you want, holding your ground and saying nothing to ease uncomfortable moments.  Allowing the first tiny transgression to go by (w/o stating the crossed boundary and consequence,) is always always a mistake, IME.  The FIRST mistake of many, IME. No one needs to repeat those patterns at this stage. Time for new ones, IME.

Mr. Man, whoever he is, is presenting himself for your discernment too. Not  just him discering around you, your attributes and what he SEES.

Some men won't appreciate this honesty.  Some go away then come back.  Some need to be sent packing and that's just part of not connecting, IME.  Some men rant and protest, but you still get to discern.  It's your job to discern, Hops. 

Because you used to hand out forks to zombies, it might be difficult to speak that freely, hold/weild the fork in new ways or not give it away..... let it be taken from you, but I urge you not to shy away from what feels like conflict.  Lean in to see what's really there, without fear, bc I have to tell you..... that's how you kiss fewer frogs and the keepers will shine through....... radiant and unexpectedly hued.  A little challenge can bring out true character and feelings,IME. 

What a deligt to find something unexpected.  Something built a little different.  Less needy and controlling...... sturdier in character without an ego hammering him into competition/winning/chasing/catching/collecting toxic traditional male roles desiring you behave in traditional female role. 

I feel sorry for Humans.  The world sends messages about what success is, what winning looks like, what is good and what is failure. Ouch.  It's crushing and constant.  So many of us didn't get "enough" in childhood.  So many aren't interested in seeing behind prescribed roles and lists of things to collect in order to be viewed as Alpha Gorilla, got it all, WINNER man..... whatever. 

I think you're looking for the guy who sees behind the cutain. Who can discern between what's supposed to be and what is here, right now... did Tupp say the joy all around us?  Someone said that. Someone who isn't still in the building collecting phase, who understands there's more to being a successful human being, partner, parent, companion.  The control issues are information, same as what appears to be humble and shy issues.  Sometimes humble and shy are just indicators insecurity and violence are going to roar forth as soon as they've been good enough, long enough to feel they can get away with anything, IME.

Who is Hops?  What do you want to be loved for?  Besides that amazing, literate brain. 

Honestly, maybe that's easier to wrap your mind around as you go on first dates.  Maybe you're interviewing yourself, in this situation, and the date provides context.

Or not.

Maybe just listening to your gut, honoring it and assuming trust will show up will interest you.  Sometimes I make it into a game..... I want to see what's really there. How ON is my intuition?  Is it off by much, if it's off  in all kinds of situations.  I find it very interesting, not matter what's going on around me, I still have me. I can count on myself.  I know that much. 

Lighter



Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on July 22, 2021, 03:03:56 AM
Sorry for my clumsy wording, I didn't mean it to sound like I don't think anyone with money can possibly be a nice person xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on July 22, 2021, 06:01:40 AM
I thought you said it well, Tupp.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 22, 2021, 07:01:17 AM
Tupp, I worried about my words too. I KNOW I'm very guarded in that setting and have a chip on my shoulder.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on July 22, 2021, 11:21:07 AM
Lighter, I loved this:
Quote
Because you used to hand out forks to zombies

And your whole post really helped me. It's funny how you can write and describe in such vividly vague ways, yet after I read your advice I see that what it really was, was grounding.

Also LOVED: Alpha gorilla man, WINNER man, vs a man who sees behind the curtain, or is at least motivated to. I don't mind a powerful older man who's spent his life in Alpha mode, jolly good for him. But only if he's reached his golden years and is still awake enough to poke his head up, sniff around and say to himself, is there a perspective missing? What have I NOT been thinking about (say, half the world)? Those un-thought subjects don't apply to Amber or you, imo. Like women's lives, male entitlement (oooo to meet a man who is INTERESTED in that self-examination; those who do are so much more creative and exciting to be with).

Amber, I really got what you meant about how you FELT around Buck (and he around you) from the get-go. You are spot on. My T observed yesterday that I am so overactive in my thinking that I neglect to tune into what's happening in my chest and solar plexus. You're both absolutely right. But happily, it came up with T in the context of recent decisions and speakings-up and boundaries-setting with M (and now with C). She heard me describe doing/saying things that just owned and spoke how I actually feel. Not editing it to be certain they wouldn't be shocked.

Tupp, my arse-kicking friend, I'll just mentally take you along.
And you are describing the absolute core of what I habitually neglect when I meet some smart man and we instantly launch into really clacking banter that pleases us to do:
Quote
seeing how you feel - do you feel good or does he make you feel anxious, restless, hurried etc - consciously or not

That's exactly it. And I can say I already spot that he's moving too fast for me -- too many pix sent. Too many requests for another phone call. It's not hugely oppressive but it's out of sync with the slow, centered way I want to proceed. So I keep my foot on the brake, tell him No, and just ignore random "pings" from silly emails. I am just too old to be enchanted by texting or funny emails, or I'm too set in my own ways. I just find them intrusive interruptions. Leave me relatively alone until we've met, fella! I'm not going to bond with you BEFORE we do.

Hmmm, more nicely, I need to explain just that to him honestly. That I resist a lot of calls or correspondence until I have actually met the person, in person. Not trying to be unfriendly and I DO look forward to meeting him. But the way I'm constructed, I just don't "meet" people (except for y'all HERE!) online or by phone. For me, I know it's a good safeguard re. men. Another phone call this afternoon, ostensibly to firm up plans for his visit later next month. So I'm going to tell him that thing about me then. Whew. I think he'll understand but if not, as Light says, that's information.

THANK YOU! Thank you all of you!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on July 22, 2021, 12:48:14 PM
Hops:

I've had really odd texting situations with a man who turned out to be so immature, so lacking in confidence that we could not hold a conversation in person AFTER he viewed me as potential mate material. 

And the texting.... was like a teenaged girl texting.  Such a plethora of never ending questions, silly statements and NNNNNEEEEEED to engage constantly. I was exasperated and overwhelmed and rocked back on my heels trying to answer some of the questions... some so person they were shocking TO ME. 

Today I'd just say I don't text much, we're not heading anyplace beyond being wood chopping friends and lock him out of all personal space... hand in his face when he overstepped...... nothing to get upset here handling of his intense teenaged child behaviors.

No judgement, just not for me.

This C guy sounds very focused on HIMSELF, how you make him feel, what you bring to his image, IMO.... perhaps?  Sound right? 

Your focus should be on you,, how you feel, what HE brings to the table with regard to what Hops wants, desires to feel, is looking for, kwim?

I'll say it till it seems right to stop... all of the above and more.

You're in charge of who you spend time with and gift your attention to. 

You're not an apple to be picked from a tree; )  Right, Tupp?

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on July 22, 2021, 01:21:35 PM
This is very wise and concrete advice, Lighter.
I'll take it. Gratefully.

I dunno what he thinks he's doing, maybe this is Latin enthusiasm.
But as you say, I intend to focus on what I feel and what I want.

He seems bright, and was very courteous when I declined an evening call. Emailed that he understood completely.

I think I'll know more once I spell out to him my philosophy of intentionally NOT bonding before an in-person meeting. So I'm just fine waiting until next month and prefer not to be in constant contact between now and then.

If he responds just as graciously to that boundary, that'll be good news. If he doesn't, well I can even cancel the meeting if I choose to. Not so far, but it's a choice I have available to me.

I am the engineer of my own choo-choo. If there's an Express train barreling down a parallel track, I can send good wishes for its safe journey. Putta-putta-putta on Thomas the Tank, is what's the right speed for me.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on July 22, 2021, 02:07:10 PM
OK.

I realize I'm resistent to and resentful when pulled into a conversation I don't want to have, perhaps NEVER will want to have.

I'm aware of sending mixed signals your way with..... ASK for what you want... tellhim what you need AND when I say I would resent having to SAY out loud I intentionally do not bond with people at any point.  Paraphrasing here,but ..... I just can't imagine saying that,bc it feels so personal.  I know it's one of my things,bc I am a very private person, believe it or not as much as I blather on here, but......
it struck me as being pushed into response,and congrats to you for having that abiltity to be responsive under pressure, Hops.

I'm feeling very emotionally distant from caretaking other people's feelings right now, so I think it's more to do with that, about ME; )

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on July 22, 2021, 02:10:19 PM
I get it, Light.

Would be much nicer to find someone who has enough functional intuition to pickup on the fact that he's too revved up and needs to slow his roll.

We'll see. More to learn before jumping out of the boxcar (OR hijacking the engine...)

I'm glad you shared all that. Truly.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on July 26, 2021, 01:20:01 PM
Interesting. After I briefly explained to "C" that I generally prefer not to do a lot of phone calls or correspondence until we've met, he promptly stopped the daily contacts. I emailed him best train schedules for his visit next month. I figure either:
1) He lost interest if he's not welcome to pursue and woo right away, or
2) He's smart, considerate (or strategic) and simply respecting my request.

Either outcome is reality-friend so all is well!

(Do wish I knew anybody who's dated a prosecutor...what to expect? Aaack.)

Dinner with M last night. Pooch VERY happy to see him. It was okay. I notice I'm not quite as mellow as I usually felt going over there, but think that's natural given the big feels and perspective change that surfaced after his sons were here and his Tgiving invite w/his sister. All that (surfacing feelings) was ouchy but helpful.

We chatted some of the usual: Coronavirus, health, politics and other stuff. I commented I thought it'd be wise for him to tour local retirement places in case a day comes when he can't manage at home. Just to know what's here so it wouldn't be a decision under pressure one day, if it's ever necessary. I know them all well and recommended the schmanciest (full of retired diplomats, professors, ambassadors, big-cheeses). Told him he'd be surrounded by highly-educated, highly-successful people and he'd likely enjoy it. He said, "You can go and live with me there!". Another jaw dropper. I just gaped, I think.

Anyhow, premature and also weird. If you care for someone enough to live with them, why wait 10-15 years? He doesn't. I just make him feel safe. If only that were mutual, but emotionally, it ain't. Dropped the subject and we ate mussels.

Lighter, you'll enjoy this: when he was over here a week ago I folded some laundry and commented on my frayed towels: "Old Gent's towels are my towels" (because that's where I got them). M glances at a towel and says, "Do they work?" (Same reaction he'd once had when I showed him a threadbare bathrobe--"oh it's fine!"). But THEN (drumroll), M said, "Does it bother you?" and I answered, "Sometimes." Well Hops, you can have towels! he says, exasperated. End of subject. A week later 2 sets of lovely Turkish towels arrive. So maybe M is still gift-clueless but actually thought about it for a sec? Made me laugh. Thanked him genuinely, said small luxuries do lift the spirit, I just don't allow myself many. Great towels.

We also briefly discussed whether we'd be pod-partners again once Delta variant hell arrives, and agreed to. For now, I feel okay about it. But am generally hauling my mind off him a bit more easily. He's very happy with his professional life at the moment, fully engaged in his own work and plans for the Moscow trip. Good.

Me, relationship with self and health and home and friends (plus hopefully some dating before the local world implodes again) -- back at it. I sense small progress.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on July 27, 2021, 09:55:17 AM
Well I'm quite excited now, Hopsie, I like the fact he backed off when you asked him to!  Getting one that actually hears what you say would be a big step forward, in my opinion :)  Is it next month you're due to meet up?  I'm glad about the towels :)  And the covid pop, should it be necessary.  I'm glad you're getting back into your groove and that things are moving forward a bit :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on July 27, 2021, 01:13:49 PM
Thanks, ((((Tupp)))).

I'm feeing if not happy about relationships at the mo', at least clear. My denial and fantasy buttons have been damaged. I'm thankful for that. I feel more reconciled with what is real, rather than my eternally busy internal fantasy machine.

About M? The disappointment is really final. I don't expect he'll rise from the ashes of unawareness and become my contrite, recomitted, self-aware life partner. (Unless I'm desperate at 85 and take him up on his offer of a spare bedroom in a schmancy retirement place. That would be a bitter and sorrowful end, but who knows, I might make peace with it in response to exigencies. We'll see. I SO doubt it. Or perhaps our clumsy "friendship" will prove more sustaining than it is now. Could be ancient history by then.)

About C. Been thinking about him with my realism cap jammed over my brow. I sincerely doubt we're a good match, but imagine we'd have fun getting to know each other -- bantering/debating (the usual thing that happens with smart powerful men who seem to delight in pushback from a female-poet-outspoken human who bears NO RESEMBLANCE to the milieux or values that have guided their alpha rises.) That's okay. I like challenge and lively conversation and intellectual equality, and so do they, generally. However. If I'm in full control of my sanity I will remember: this process of opening to the possibility of good things happening -- is about my OWN dream of vital shared and trusting life companionship. Not dates that are like exciting movies, which end.

So that's a big change. I want/intend to remember: this is my LIFE, not just my evening. And I'm going to hold onto what is True North for me and my own life journey. Not what would just entertain and/or excite them.

I think I can do it. Maintain reality.

That's new! OMG.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on July 27, 2021, 01:26:28 PM
Hear! Hear! To Hops knowing and trusting her own true North....and trusting it's wisdom.

Yes

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on July 28, 2021, 09:00:08 AM
Quote
If I'm in full control of my sanity I will remember: this process of opening to the possibility of good things happening -- is about my OWN dream of vital shared and trusting life companionship. Not dates that are like exciting movies, which end.

Quoted for truth.  LOL.

But in reality this first stage of relationship is kinda like a seesaw Hops. Sometimes one is more centered in those romantic feelings (or else, why bother?) and sometimes in the reality of what your goals are for your future. I just can't picture you forming a functional relationship that provides stability and more resources and companionship in old age - WITHOUT a wee bit more than "respectful affection" on the flip side of the coin. So, like a team of horses, you need to get them to work together, not independently "take charge" of direction. And sometimes that's helped or hindered by the partner.

As to C giving you some space - who knows the reason why? It may be something "normal" for him... and he stepped down his participation onlne, respecting your request. Maybe he has a busy couple of weeks. And maybe he's moving on to someone more immediately accessible... as long as you remember that you were looking for someone you might be interested in (and vice versa) when you agreed to communicate/meet... and that if he walks away it's probably the universe telling YOU to move to on to something better -- and not a personal permanent condemnation of who you are; all will be well.

I think sometimes when we let the fantasy horse lead, one can let the heart space start to "believe" prematurely. It's secret, you know. Except it's not, really. It's better to keep a tight rein on that horse. Pay attention to the practical plodder more and give the whole team more time and practice before making that decision to let the heart space just do it's thing. If one stands in our power of choice and discernment when those feelings start to filter in, and threaten to wander away into the more imaginative and emotionally charged thoughts - one is better able to protect one's own "touchy" issues and more clearly see the partner through his actions and behaviors. By that point, one knows if one can extent enough trust to "go there" - into the heart space - and still be safe.

Sometimes that can all happen fast. Or it can be very slow and gradual. And as I kinda discovered - it can be both.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 03, 2021, 09:08:46 AM
Amber, embroidering this on a sofa pillow is taking an extremely long time but I thank you for it!
Quote
...when we let the fantasy horse lead, one can let the heart space start to "believe" prematurely. It's secret, you know. Except it's not, really. It's better to keep a tight rein on that horse. Pay attention to the practical plodder more and give the whole team more time and practice before making that decision to let the heart space just do it's thing. If one stands in our power of choice and discernment when those feelings start to filter in, and threaten to wander away into the more imaginative and emotionally charged thoughts - one is better able to protect one's own "touchy" issues and more clearly see the partner through his actions and behaviors. By that point, one knows if one can extent enough trust to "go there" - into the heart space - and still be safe.

I am making progress. Sometimes my feelings in the opposite direction of the happy horserace are a clue, too.

I've been noticing in recent months (particularly since his sons' visits and how difficult it was to be held up like a girlfriend, when I ain't any more) that it's gotten harder to be around M. Avoiding it, really. Or when we get together, although it's the same rituals around meeting/eating/yakking, feeling shut down and depressed. He delights in my company (my listening) and seems perfectly comfortable with the new shape of our relationship. I no longer fantasize or hope or imagine it's anything it's not. But something was gnawing at me.

I finally realized it was that we have had absolutely ZERO conversation about how we feel or what we want as friends, and for me the whole scenario was beginning to feel fake and painful and unexpressed and if not awkward, at least superficial and strange. I can still enjoy his company but it's bittersweet and almost like a constant reminder of a dream given and then taken back, so to speak. More motivation to move on, which I YAM.

After my poetry meeting yesterday I went over and we had a real talk. I didn't rub his face in it but mentioned that I really am trying to move on, and though I don't want to reject his friendship at all, it's been a difficult process for me. I told him I am open to dating again and getting a little bit of response, and without much detail did let him know that I am doing so. He got it.

And he let one thing out that I had a shocked reaction to, internally. Although he said again that I can always count on him, I am permanently in his "circle of firelight" etc etc etc (and I have no idea how real that is)...and talked a ton about his own plans (stay right where he is and change nothing)....he also said that although he "hates to mention it" when I had the small stroke that really made him pause. And he doesn't want to risk ever losing anyone again (as when his wife died).

I get it. It's normal for older people to think about the consequences of commitment. I do too. But I guess....his cancer and his heart disease never had anything to do with me backing away, and it kind of hurt to hear him be so ... I dunno, transactional. I felt as though he was seeing me as "defective" so in spite of all the flowery transcendent language about what I meant to him then and mean still, this was another example of him saying: I'll talk love and commitment but when it comes right down to it, I won't sacrifice anything for you.

I just teased him that he couldn't even move his pepper shaker out of the way to make room for me and he got it. I'm not hating on him for his stroke comment, but found it a little bit cruel. It's the kind of thing anybody could THINK, but to tell someone to their face...I wouldn't. It's even a perfectly good reason for him to reconsider a partnership, commitment, etc. Could well be for me too, in future. I just don't get why he brought it up. Maybe it was to "get me back." Dunno, but really, it doesn't matter.

Anyway, good to know, I guess. Kind of sad.

C update. He's back from his trip and ready to plan his little train adventure to visit me. He can't make his email work consistently to save his life so I hope he pulls it off. I'm looking forward to an evening with him and he's already inviting me to the Kennedy Center etc. Not sure how much will be possible given Covid, but it's fun to have his interest. Next steps are MEET IN PERSON, then see where/whether it goes.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on August 03, 2021, 10:13:56 AM
I think M was trying to hurt you back, Hops.  It was my very first thought.

It's great you have new possible relationship on your horizon. 
Enjoy.
 Boundaries in place.
Listen to your gut.
Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 03, 2021, 11:45:16 AM
Thank you, Lighter.
Thanks for helping me not remain in denial.

You are an excellent reality check for me about men and how they tick.

It's sometimes hard to protect ourselves against ourselves when it comes to the penis people....

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on August 03, 2021, 12:40:34 PM
That decision to not risk again, another person you are committed to is a personal choice. No right/wrong about it. Even when one is clear on that decision, there is second-guessing and the unexpected and unforeseen to deal with that can lead to regrets and worse.

I know this, but I made my decision and will take care of meself as best I can - and with help - and stand strong in that commitment.

Today is appt day.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 03, 2021, 02:41:41 PM
I agree, Amber. I don't think he was wrong to discover that limit within himself. What might have shown more kindness, however, would have been to not go house hunting and continue to feed the Big Dream fantasies. What he did instead left me ongoingly hurt and confused as he subtly sabotaged those visions while not admitting he was no longer committed to our lifetime relationship.

Although I still have real love for M, to me, he showed a combo of selfishness and some weak personal integrity in the way he brought it up (which felt like an underhanded slice--"oh, but unfortunately you have this defect..." kind of implication-- not an adult conversation about long-term care questions). If he really loved me and cared about my wellbeing, like -- actual love rather than "I like her conversation and attention so I will keep her involved with me" -- he would have told me as a man that he was reconsidering his former declaratinos and realizing he couldn't maintain that promise of security etc, rather than letting me go through a long slow and painful disillusionment process while he just watched.

That's probably a bit harsh, because nobody fully knows themselves and every human being is capable of mixed motivations (my self included). I just have an internal high bar for honesty and not leading people on. I'm not sure M intended to do that...I'm pretty sure he believed his own hyperbole for the first year...and it's my responsibility to shake off poet-brain and light up grownup-brain to accept full responsibility for my own choices. And outcomes.

I think I'm doing that now. I choose to continue to love him in some way as a friend only. But I also choose to be less automatically available to him for his weekly dinner diversions and daily superficial email exchanges (or his evening calls to unload his day). Those were depressing me. Duh. So I'm going to tune into what I actually feel like --doing or declining-- going forward, and not automatically go along with his invites, generous (and delicious) as they might be.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on August 03, 2021, 04:12:43 PM
Hops:

Deep down, do you feel healthy boundaries, applied consistently, will keep you safe in new relationships?

I don't know if I've every experienced that in a way I could make sense of, myself.  I feel like I don't know the what and how.  What I experience is reactive paralysis when THE moment to address that first boundary transgression arises.  The more irrational the transgresssion, the more paralyzed I've felt.

I have a sense of healthy boundaries working when I manage to put and keep them IN place, but it's not yet muscle memory.

I do notice reactivity falling away and it feels very hopeful.

Lighter


Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 03, 2021, 05:25:44 PM
Yes, YES! I do believe that.

I don't know that I'll become a perfect boundary-laying machine, but I am very clear that what you so often say--watch out for the FIRST ignored boundary and correct that pronto-- is the right goal.

I am just feeling clarity, and oddly -- peace.

I think it's from conveying to M, without any anger at all, that he can't take me for granted any more. I don't need to make him a villain, but he's not my main magnet any more.

(It only took me a YEAR to untangle!)

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on August 03, 2021, 06:21:10 PM
I think M helped you identify your boundaries, Hops.   

He helped you find your self protective spirit....and use it.

It's sad he's emotionally immature and selfish, but that's who he is.  It wasn't about you.

You sound ready to let him go.

Light
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 04, 2021, 07:05:12 AM
I am, Lighter. The inner beagle is moving on. With sadness but eyes open. I think M has used me in ways, in other ways he's been real. But the not-owning anything ever, not apologizing ever, has accumulated...and the shine is off. All his hints and intimations at promises and commitment and certainty no longer ring reliable.

I don't find him emotionally reliable. I have begun to find him boring. I'm spotting his manipulative side. Rather than let my resentment build, I'm going to throttle back contact to occasionally, if I feel up for it in the moment. If I don't, I don't.
Much better for me in the long run to get the bandaid all the way off, rather than leave it dangling and ripe for infection.

I have mixed my metaphors to a beagle wearing a bandaid. Tired brain.

Speaking of tired brains, I'm concerned there might be something cognitive happening with C, whom I do not yet know. He can't seem to get communication methods straight and I'm about to let the idea go. I told him repeatedly that I don't text and he forgets. I explained I don't use my cell unless I'm away from the house but he calls me on my cell (last night after 9pm). I wasn't angry or assuming this was an intentional boundary breach because it suddenly hit me that maybe this wasn't dismissive of my requests, but a man who might be confused. He is 79. So maybe this whole fantasy that he's going to come here on a train and can successfully plan that is impeded by something on his end that I don't understand. I have a glimmer it might just be a sad reality that a clear connection and functional communication isn't happening for that reason. Hope I'm wrong but it's feeling too cloudy right now. He seems to want to chat a lot on the phone but is dragging his feet about making the plan. I will not build a phone relationship first. So maybe it's just a stalemate. That's okay but I'm real close to butting out entirely.

For a man who lives in the Watergate, I'd think he could resolve his computer issues enough to email. He says email's working fine, yet email (sent him train info) I've sent to both his addresses has started to bounce (when it worked before). He says his computer guy is "on speed dial" but didn't get it fixed yesterday and made no reference to it during our brief chat last night (I told him I was about to sleep).

He comes across as nice and as eager. I don't know enough about him to understand whether he really is okay, but I'm starting to wonder.

Oh well. Dating in one's 70s has to take aging issues into account, but this is feeling unwieldly in a weird way. I'm not blaming him as he may be unable to focus or remember stuff. But if I don't get a clear email about plans soon, I'm out.

Good for me. Yay, me.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on August 04, 2021, 10:42:15 AM
I guess I didn't quite appreciate how another decade might impact the logistics required by age, impacts the old mental image & expectations of getting to know and be attracted to someone. Sure, B & I laugh a good bit about "The Old Folks' Boogie"... which ain't as easy as it once was for either of us and right now we're searching for a misplaced & forgotten coffee cup. But we've been burning the midnight oil talking, telling personal histories, and such.

Continuing to engage somONE, meet them, and even if nothing comes of the risk - keeps you healthier, Hops. It's a good thing to do, while it does have it's difficulties. I for one, am glad I kept that door open to the possibility.

Maybe the stars will line up for you pretty soon. I hope so. Maybe give C a chance to get his act together - but continue "shopping" and engaging, carefully out there? It also sounds like he's still actively engaged in a lot of work that might be distracting him, or he has underlying issues (of some sort) or even that he's not as invested in finding a lady love... as you are, for security & companionship.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 04, 2021, 12:27:11 PM
You're right, Amber.
Continuing to open and look through that door, whether it results in a true-love relationship or not, is a healthy thing for me to do.

Right now I'm marveling at how I held on for a year after breaking off the illusory relationship with M, and feeling sorrow at how much grief I was trying to paper over with the convenient friendship.

Now I do feel the walls closing in, and the full weight of solitude. But I will pull out of this. I think I just have to face what the feelings are. Handily, I see my T in half an hour and will talk it through there.

I hope I have circled the drain with M for the last time, whether I ever see him or not. Just...mentally. How draining it has been. I don't want that for myself any more. I don't want deep loneliness either, but there are positive ways to combat that if I'll only step forward and arrange them.

Waiting and hoping for it to come to me amounts to waiting and hoping. I'm going to be more proactive than that, but release the damn outcome!

Dunno about C. I just have a hunch the guy is struggling, and don't want to get all involved over the phone until I can see and feel for myself, in person, what his vibe is. It's been fun but is starting to feel illusory and chaotic. Don't need that either.

SO glad you and B are together -- will check out the Farm thread when I get back!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 04, 2021, 02:28:43 PM
T was helpful. I teared up for a change (almost never cry there).

I just described the way I've been feeling, weird layer peeling away by layer, since his sons came. And how irritable and stultified I've felt over our repetitive "go over for dinner once a week and talk about the same subjects and nothing personal ever." And then the Big Talk on Monday. And how he slipped in some truths: Don't wanna change my life at all for anybody, and stay here and keep me company weekly anyway but on my schedule....and: don't be a defective "stroke" person, since I might suffer if you died and that's not acceptable. And, I love your dog. (That was a good one.)

She got it. Got pretty pissed about his stroke comment. Told me I'm doing really good work. I realized I am just doing the next (and fortunately, a later) stage of grief. I really did have a lot to grieve when our relationship fell apart, and now it's not a "faux" friendship but has been a weird one since. For me. He's entirely happy with how I've been slotting into his needs.

I made a big step. He sent me the usual "come to dinner" invite and I replied that I am going to wait a week more and figure it out then. Woo HOO, brave Hops!

Who knows? By this time next week maybe I'll either be: Brave enough to cut the last thread or realize I'm strong enough to enjoy what's good that lingers and go over anyway.

Dunno which. I feel like apologizing to every friend I have for taking so long and talking so interminably about this relationship and its death or change spiral. But it's the most significant bond I've had with any man in over 20 years, and there were so many confusing carrots hanging off my halter, that it's just going to take the time it takes.

I've decided I have my own permission to bore people. Sorry, dear Amazons. But thank you...more than you know!

hugs and love,
Hops

PS-- So I sent C a message explaining the incoherent connections (email? text? -NO- dating site?) were daunting and that I sympathize and he's off the hook if it's just too cumbersome to organize. He just replied and said he'd be on the train TOMORROW. I gently explained the concept of "not without notice, I have a life" (not in so many words) and we scheduled it for later this month. Hah. Fun I hope.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on August 04, 2021, 04:03:59 PM
T was helpful. I teared up for a change (almost never cry there).

I just described the way I've been feeling, weird layer peeling away by layer, since his sons came. And how irritable and stultified I've felt over our repetitive "go over for dinner once a week and talk about the same subjects and nothing personal ever." And then the Big Talk on Monday. And how he slipped in some truths: Don't wanna change my life at all for anybody, and stay here and keep me company weekly anyway but on my schedule....and: don't be a defective "stroke" person, since I might suffer if you died and that's not acceptable. And, I love your dog. (That was a good one.)

She got it. Got pretty pissed about his stroke comment. Told me I'm doing really good work. I realized I am just doing the next (and fortunately, a later) stage of grief. I really did have a lot to grieve when our relationship fell apart, and now it's not a "faux" friendship but has been a weird one since. For me. He's entirely happy with how I've been slotting into his needs.  I admire his honesty.  I don't necessarily like HIM, but am always grateful when people gift me with honesty so I can finally FINALLY peg down my feelings about the reality of the situation. 

I made a big step. He sent me the usual "come to dinner" invite and I replied that I am going to wait a week more and figure it out then. Woo HOO, brave Hops!  I bet that felt SO GOOD.  He might get very happyfriendly soon.  Expect it.

Who knows? By this time next week maybe I'll either be: Brave enough to cut the last thread or realize I'm strong enough to enjoy what's good that lingers and go over anyway.  Who would you make that decision for?  Why would you make it?
 DO you NEED to force that ? Soon?  Now?  Why?  I say.... you don't have to do anything. If you want to think about it. Think.  If you want to putitdown.... PID.  If you want to pick it back up... PIBU.  And no excuses or explanations are necessary, ever, particularly to your friends.   You can calmly turn it over in your mind and see what's there, but you don't have to judge it, Hops.  Not good or bad.
 Ever.  Just what you want or don't want in that moment of thought and it's perfectly OK.  It always has been. 

Why is it so difficult to drop into the moment? Why is it so hard to stop worrying about the past and the present?  I KNOW we're conditioned and trained and develop pathways to DO that, but once we SEE it..... it's still so difficult, IME.


Dunno which. I feel like apologizing to every friend I have for taking so long and talking so interminably about this relationship and its death or change spiral. But But.  You don;t owe anyone an explanation or excuse or reason for doing what needs doing.
 IME we (yes, the royal one) do this automatically, without thinking about it and it slows the process of moving through the thing we're trying to figure out EVERY DARN TIME.
it's the most significant bond I've had with any man in over 20 years, and there were so many confusing carrots hanging off my halter, that it's just going to take the time it takes.  Seeking/Avoidance forces are driving our lives and will as long as we get pushed and pulled by the fear and desire for comfort.  That might not make sense right now, but I don't edit my posts, bc I choose not to.  I know what it means and you can ask if you want clarification THAT FEELS WONDERFUL to just write and leave it behind without checking and changing, it truly does. 

I've decided I have my own permission to bore people. Sorry, dear Amazons. But thank you...more than you know!  Feel free to bore yourself further on my YARD thread.  It's it amazing?!?!?! It's GRAND!! Don't you apologize, ever again for penning your truth here, of all places, for these Amazons and the Amazons who come after.  Honestly, Hops. I remember when you told me to stop apologizing all the time....and you said other wise things, but at the time that was my take away.  Yet, we keep seeing lessons come round and round again and again, don't we?  !

hugs and love,
Hops

PS-- So I sent C a message explaining the incoherent connections (email? text? -NO- dating site?) were daunting and that I sympathize and he's off the hook if it's just too cumbersome to organize. He just replied and said he'd be on the train TOMORROW. I gently explained the concept of "not without notice, I have a life" (not in so many words) and we scheduled it for later this month. Hah. Fun I hope. I'm curious now, Hops. Just what DO you have going on tomorrow that can't bbe put off?  Do you want to meet this fellow?  Whatever you choose, it's OK and you don't owe anyone an explanation for your choices. 
Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 04, 2021, 06:16:41 PM
Thanks, (((((Lighter)))). Very much.

No, LOL, I really do not want to meet him tomorrow without notice, and I do have other things scheduled! I was agog that he is so master-of-the-universeful that he just decided he'd come and of course I'd be ready to hustle up and make it work! (I had asked him to pick a couple dates and let me know and I'd confirm one...guess he reads too fast). Aaagggh. Nope nope nope. I just laughed and then we both looked at calendars and picked a date that works for us both. Jeez! It's funny but also a pink flag. Not a very original one, and I'm looking forward to the evening anyway. Should be fun. (He also decided on his own that rather than take the morning train back, he'd stay the whole next day. I told him I hadn't counted on that and he said no worries. If I'm enjoying him on our date I'll meet him during the day and if not, he can amuse himself....)

My collection of entitled, powerful (but charming) men is swelling. Crazy.

Thanks especially for this:
Quote
If you want to think about it. Think.  If you want to putitdown.... PID.  If you want to pick it back up... PIBU.  And no excuses or explanations are necessary, ever, particularly to your friends.   You can calmly turn it over in your mind and see what's there, but you don't have to judge it

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on August 04, 2021, 07:58:43 PM
I, right or wrong, get the sense the new guy felt you were brushing him off BC he failed to set a date and get his arse on the train and so just DID it out of panic. 

::shrug::.

Whatever happens, you're the Amazon Warrior Queen in your world.  He's no master of the universe outside his world.

You get to see if he's cool with that or not cool.  I say be yourself, without fail and see what happens.

Seek out the fun, even if there's no connection...... recoup whatever goodness is there. If you're involved, there will be goodness, IMO; )

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 04, 2021, 11:56:34 PM
I have a plan!

I'm just going to channel the one in the middle, all the way through.
(Don't miss the very end...!)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynR1XmQruoo (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynR1XmQruoo)

LOLOLOLOL

OMG, just watched it through again, and her father absolutely losing his MIND is just as amazing as she is. Future Amazon, no doubt! (Her, errr, "leadership" got me too.) Oh so funny and satisfying!
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on August 05, 2021, 11:54:27 AM
LOL....Amazon Hops rocking her middle, YES!  You never know what a master if his universe is looking for.  My B wanted to give and serve.....it was a struggle till I released my need to give all the time and relax into happy receiving.

You be you and see what chemistry is there or not there. 
Listen to your middle, Hops!

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 09, 2021, 10:20:31 PM
C had to reschedule since his D is visiting, so will be here a week later. I don't feel frazzled any more. Calm, but recognize I am guarded. Will see how it goes.

M is getting anxious because I've backed off again. Is emailing me superficial silly things every day which yanks my brain back toward him; good news is that it's not working as well as it used to. He just wrote, have you decided about dinner at my house this week? (Third time he's asked, each time I said don't know yet.) So I replied that I can't come over to his house soon, not without talking about personal and vulnerable feelings I'm working through that are "not his favorite kinds of topics." And to let it settle a few more weeks because it won't always be painful. I think that's the truth.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 13, 2021, 10:58:16 PM
I think I'm done with M. Like, really done. No rage or anything, just acceptance. And this wave of detaching won't hurt anywhere near as much as the first grief did.

Despite my having spelled out for him so clearly that being around his family is painful for me, he ignored it. As I mentioned he tried to book my Tgiving with his sister. I said thank you but no, and repeated my reason. (He always goes, of course I understand completely and then proceeds to do whatever he wants anyway. That used to confused me like crazy, until the couples T pointed out the pattern: He says something so courteously acknowledging (Yes of course...) but switches and reframes or ignores immediately thereafter. So whatever I say, if it's contrary to the image he is fixed on of his goal, is like dust.

Anyhow, he just did it again (this time a stepson, lovely man, whom we spent time with at his home in Costa Rica). Sson is coming and M wants me to join them for dinner. Same restaurant as with his son when I first began to feel like an image prop. I re-sent him my simple statement about it being painful. He invites me two more times.

That all built up and reminded me SO clearly of being ignored other times and I realized that it can happen in our "just friendship" too and if I keep on companioning, I'm re-enacting what caused me to break up with him in the first place.

Told him so clearly but kindly and he replied that I'm "too self-absorbed." I'd just had it and exited with as much grace as I could manage.

Instead of sad, I feel mostly calmer, clearer. Looking forward to meeting new people and not recycling this endless stalemate.

I'll believe it when I continue it, but this does feel different.
Snip, snip and SNIP.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on August 14, 2021, 08:24:50 AM
M just can't hold other people's needs in his mind very long, if he manages at all, IMO.

It's like watching a toddler very politely navigate his world, typically garnering praise for his ability with language and polite behavior, but he's still a toddler. He has no real ability to navigate the world consistently/safely/mindfully, bc..... toddler brain.

The lashing out at you... calling you self absorbed really is telling, isn't it?

And...

THE NERVE!

Had to be said and....

POT!

If toddler brain wanted and could handle adult reciprocal relationship...... M would.  He just can't and that's his best, I think.

Expectations adjusted successfully, Hops.

Well done.

Lets see what C 's about: )

Lighter





Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on August 14, 2021, 12:53:32 PM
Methinks M doth project too much Hops.
Glad you're moving on.  ;)
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 14, 2021, 04:23:03 PM
Thanks, guys. You are beyond kind to me.

Poet friend spit nails but bucked me up too.

It's really going to be okay.
And I figure being a sloooooooooow learner is better than not learning at all.

I am looking forward to meeting C! And guess what, also a writer not far away, and a woodworker! The website is coughing up more interesting oldies!

Hops outta da box! LOL.

love y'all--
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on August 14, 2021, 09:59:06 PM
Grrr..... M accusing YOU of being self absorbed.... is... heinous fockery, in my book.

Gaslighting.  Trying to shame you into complianc while relegating your needs to the woodpile. 

Your outlandish need for reciprocity. 

Again....

THE NERVE!

He'd have you sitting, mute, at his table.  Yumming over all his delicious dinners..... hmmmmm....

I'm hungry.

It's just not enough and he's unwilling to give an inch. 

AN INCH. 

Willing to make you doubt yourself, make you stop asking for anything FOR yourself..... he wants you to sit there and look pretty and smart.  He wants a worthy prop to drop into his life, move out of his life, back in then out....
and you're not a prop, Hops.

Lighter



Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 15, 2021, 12:47:28 AM
Lighter, were you ever a little girl named Johanna who really digs Aretha? LOL.

Thanks. Your indignation on my behalf is very affirming. Y'all been flies on the wall or something? (You and poet friend sound very similar!)

I think that when M is not getting what he wants, he does exactly what you described. But the rest of it is apt, too...it's really a dismissiveness that comes from entitlement. His whole long life. Somehow, he missed empathy training. Doesn't matter any more why (I suspect being parented by cooks and yanked from Costa Rica to Hollywood as a child while his mother drove around in her pink cadillac being eccentric....he finished raising himself and discovered intellect. Most of his joy since has been from that. Success, too.)

What you particularly highlight that's extra helpful right now, is showing me what over-compliance looks like, and in fact that's right. (I miss the food but it gave me something to do while mute...) Not to be too cruel, he did tell me cooking food is how he shows love, and to the degree he can, I believe sometimes it was that.

More to the point, about him tossing my needs into the woodpile and me daring to want reciprocity .... also true. But the good news is that I really did make a decision because those things kind of came utterly clear to me in the last week. It's not tenable to try to be his best friend while he refuses to acknowledge, ever, anything he also contributed to the relationship's problems. He just can't.

So I'm clear. I replied with both assertiveness and gratitude for the time when it felt very exciting to be "his person" and tried to put it all in a growth context, with understanding that we're very different humans and so it's best to let it go. By "it" I mean the close friendship he intended to resume with me in a couple months.

I've decided that will not be good for me in three months either and am letting it go permanently. Said so in so many words and explained that I'm filtering his emails now not to be spiteful but so I don't let myself get drawn back into arguing. It's done.

I think we both tried to be as gracious as we could so it wasn't a horrible ending. But it was an ending. Whew.

(Between Tupp giving him a proper arse-whipping and you calling him out on a billboard, he wouldn't dare try again. Poor guy. I do feel sorry for him, he's so trapped in himself. But I'm not fitting into his frame any more.)

On to the geezer hunt! And the rest of life too.

hugs
Hops





Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on August 15, 2021, 10:16:39 AM
Phew!

I'm happy for you, that you may take on several options instead of just one during this next phase Hops. I think sometimes there is an unconscious reflex to closely attach when there is only one choice or option in your life at a time. And that may actually be bearable long-term and yet STILL not be completely what you want.

I'll bet you do your research, read reviews, and the long term reports when buying a car. Or making any other large significant investment. You take the car for a test-drive; see how it fits your unique requirements and driving style. What the fuel efficiency is, the safety features/record. We should do no less with those intimate relationships (knowing full well, it's not completely "knowable" what risk we're taking over time).

Remember my advice to Hol, when she was dating -- you have to kiss a lot of toads, before you find the frog who is really a prince. I have kissed a LOT of toads, LOLOLOLOLOL. I may have been a cheap date - but was never "easy". And over the course of "shopping", all those years, and even actually accepting certain vehicles... I kinda gained a new perspective about how important my participation, choice, discernment, and plain old druthers were to the whole process. It's a quiet and internal - and open - form of power. Not control - just not being at the mercy of my own foibles, appearances, conditioning, social pressure or relational pressure.

After all, we're making a choice that will be with us for years, right?
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 15, 2021, 11:45:12 AM
Yup. In this chapter of life, choices do seem weightier.
Fewer big blocks of stretchy unstructured time are ahead to reboot and redo.

And you're right, Amber, doesn't matter if power is quiet, loud or manipulative, it's still power. And for that matter, it's responsibility and ethics too.

I think, not that I'm objective, that the religious training of my childhood was SO dark and intense that I almost over-empathize in my relationships, and don't realize until I'm pretty well in that it's got to be two-way for me to be able to hang in.

I agree that not focusing on one gent too fast or hard will be helpful too. Maybe nothing happens with any of them, or something does. I'm not going to obsess, but am going to keep that door open.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 15, 2021, 12:27:42 PM
The synchronicity of a Poetry Daily selection can amaze me; it did today. Love this:

The Funeral

--Felicity Sheehy

What we learned the day of the service
was that the reception had been moved
out of the church galley down the hall
to the third-grade classroom, decorated
with cut-out Christs and handprint turkeys,
a motto hung over the door: Be Good.
The priest showed us the way, sweating
and swinging his bad leg, explaining
we'd thank him later for the air conditioning.
Inside, the desks were shoved to one wall,
and a fold-out table perched its legs
by the blackboard. We arranged the pictures
at the front of the room, where they looked
from their June barbecues and Florida vacations
at the concrete out the window, gently steaming.
Back in the church, the fans were running
so loudly we couldn't hear ourselves
and the readings evaporated in the rafters,
where the only things listening were the faces
of window saints. Towards the end, the priest
made a joke about the coolness of heaven.
We followed him back to the classroom,
which now held an array of danishes
and cardboard boxes of coffee ("Half-off
from TOPS," he said). I drank cup after cup
of decaf, lightening and lightening
and lightening them with cream, watching
the silent pictures watching us. How little we
had in common. Their whole world had ended,
while somewhere ours continued, past the flat
voices and the shuffle around the room, past
the borders of this town, where the fields fill
with the flashlights of so many people
looking for each other, flooding the skies
here, floors and floors beneath the stars.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on August 15, 2021, 03:29:53 PM
I'm chiming in here.....
a few things to say about you guy's last posts.

Firstly...... I want to say there are different ways to have reciprocity in relationships.  The fault, I find, is when we over value someone's contribtions over those of other's...... say..... when we value money over companionship/keeping a home/creating sacred space/BEING home for two people, particularly when one of those people, typically the one with money, is in seeking/avoidance space, searching and searching for relief from feeling lost in the world through achievement and hoarding money. 

In both my marriages, husbands held the same belief system...... being productive was about making money. There was no value in anything else, for either of them, at least not that they'd own up to.  That I made more money than the first husband meant he was more cruel, more judgmental, more driven to drive me into the dirt like a beach donkey....... make me insane, then point to the insanity and threaten to have me institutionalized, which
made
me
angry.
Which
was
the
turning point for him and my willingness to sit, mute, and listen to his raging every morning about how I'd tricked him into marriage, blah blah blah... fine.  Once I SAW it, it was over and that was enough for me.  Confusion gave way to constructive.... NO.

Confusion gave way to "productive" emotions.

Productive.  We disagreed about the definition of production, in both my marriages. I wish I'd have focused on what I valued, what I believed and what my minimum standards for relationship would BE. 

Clearly, I'd failed to identify my minimum, set boundaries and set consquences......which is what I'd do now.  Honestly, I think I DID that, but after committment took place, things changed with the men. Not with me, but I was trusthworthy and assumed they were too, which was my bad.  Not theirs. That's why taking M to a T, who could LOOKat him WITHyou, Hops.... seemed really prudent to me.  Someone else observing and SEEING what was there, or not there...... a shared advocate for each of you and for you as a couple. 

I'm noticing I'm frustrated with what I wrote,bc I wrote about what I was raised with.... traditional roles I no longer value or want to SEE, or live my life by.  It's a trap. It's a dream taking my atttention away from what's behind it.... what's really going on.... secrets I want to find and know and explore.

I've been the things I wrote about....I've been a doting mate..... I've been a pleasure to feed amazing meals and I typically dance in my seat, so I'm overtly pleased and demonstratively fun to eat with, or so I've been told. 

The thing about BEING anything in a relationship is, it's dangreous to judge or label anything,IME.  The idea...the imagined "perfect" relationship isn't ever perfect or enough..... I think. We have to be enough, on our own, I think.  The other has to be enough on their own.... I think.  THEN there can be harmonious union, disagreement and harmonious union coming back into focus again.  Yup yup yup. I believe that.

I, for one, didn't require a lot of tending to. I likely would be considered a "cheap date" Amber, bc I honestly thrive on having time, space and adventure on my own, separate from mates....... I don't have high expectations for reciprocity, as a very introverted human who gets a lot of energy from my internal world.  I'm often INSIDE my own head when with others, or in public and that's what it is. 

The grass is green, the sky is blue.... sometimes. Not always and that's OK too. 

My point is.....Hops.... I could SEE you with M, earlier on in the relationship.  I could envision you spending more time with your friends, making new friends, maybe M's friends would become yours and you would form a new language around dealing with M successfully, feel kinship and light humor shared without judgment or cruelty.... just.... the grass is green, the sky is blue and M is doing his very best... can do no more..... there's peace around his limits and strengths..... it's all OK.  NOT requiring he meet you where you were would have required you meet your own needs or find other companionship to meet them and that's always an option. It's always OK. It's not traditional and I want to be clear...... it's possible "traditional" doesn't actually exist, IMO.  It's possible we have ideas and unconscious beliefs about what romantic reciprocal relationship IS,. has to BE, must DO in our lives before we FEEL at peace, serene, calm and at home in our skin, always, bc we're enough and we always have been. 

Having your own life, coming together with M at dinner time..... traveling a bit...... enjoying his family....... then going back to your friend group for needs M could never fill and that being OK with you and your idea of what "relationship" was, or could be, should be.... just being OK with it.  At peace.  Serene. I could see that for you.  I didn't know if you could see it for yourself. 

Adding another human being, no matter who it is, should be finding someone bc we want to find them... not bc we need to find them, kwim?

The whole..... game playing in relationships...thing..... is...... for people who don't feel at home in their skin as they are.  It's for people who react to the carelessly lobbed phrase.... "you're self absorbed" by someone who truly IS self absorbed, but unable to SEE it, understand it...... know what they've done, what they did, IME.

So, whatever comes of the dating scene...... Hops is OK. Will be OK. Has always been OK.  Hops remembers that, or doesn't, but she's still OK... you're still OK, Hops.  Always.

When you enter relationship from that point, you're free from so much gamesmanship and limitating ideas of what SHOULD be.  Free from limits, I think.  More choice.  Less shoulds.

I'm ready to see relationsbhip through a fresh lense...... free from societal rules and unspoken agreements about what's worthy..... worth more..... valued, not of value.

My brother's fruend pops into my head as I'm writing.  He was bitterly divorced and SUPER bitter while my brother was divorcing.

Then brother and bitter guy dated together for a while.... dated women from Miami..... maybe women from S. America, but the whole thing was about having fun.  Bitter fruend was dating a gal from..... another Country.  She was behaving like his wife, but my brother would report Bitter Fruend would NEVER ever ever marry her. She was selling real estate. BF was sending her work, maybe bought her a condo.... she was raising kids... but he was NEVER going to marry her.  THAT was certain.

Fast forward a bit and there's wedding pictures. Bitter frruend and gal pal have a huge lavish weddig.....she's decorating his huge home and redoing the kitchen as his wife... they bought a place in Mexico and her entire large family has surrounded BF, he lives in the midst of many many people and looks happier than I've ever seen him look and this is AFTER he had a heart attack. 

What changed, you might ask.

He had a heart attack.

She was there for him, helped him, nursed him, it's assumed.  He had a change of heart about the things he valued, it's assumed, bc they are all over the place traveling, living life together, enjoying their shared families and that looked like WINNING to me.

And I wonder what my brother thinks about his friend's change of heart, no pun intended.  We haven't spoken about it, but there will come a day when what my brother values most may change.  He's very traditional, imo. 

His 3 weeks of Covid might have him questioning what he feels is most important in his life... maybe not.  I hope he's open to finding reciprocal relationship with an equal and by equal I mean someone who compliments HIM.... and he compliments her.  He's lived a life of "Hot trumps crazy" for years.  His ex wife..... going back to her again and again...... "Hot trumps crazy" was brother's mantra and I didn't understand it, but I didn't need to.  I just knew crazy TRUMPS EVERYTHING in my life. I will never ever ever consider crazy something I should or could put up with for even a minute...... for what?  Sex?  Showing off a  pretty person so my perceived worth goes up in THIS world?   Maybe my brother's idea of relationship has to be...... woman has to be HOT, and that's the important thing.  With that said, he's not screening out CRAZY by that metric.  It's not the only metric. The women he dates are always smart and overtly competent, which means good and bad things for my brother, IME.  Will see. I wish him happy relationship.  He might have to spend some time alone.... endure dark nights of the soul before he changes his understanding of relationship and what he wants going forward.

I'm trying to get OUT of the world where value and worth are found in material thing... in collecting things.... in hoarding things of value or controlling other people.  I've dated pretty people.  VAPID pretty people.   I've played with pretty people. I've been controlled pretty person and I've been an equal in relationship...... part of me still mourns that loss.  Maybe part of me believes I'll never have it again, but I realize......
I don't think Ican go back to traditional relationship, even if I find it.  There's been too much ugliness and trauma and bald face KNOWING.... SEEING what's there and what's not.

What I might want.... or be willing to accept..... is likely something I've never experienced or imagined.  I'm still too limited by the rules and societal ideas.

I'd settle for what I always settled for.... someone with a good sense of humor, who gets my sense of humor..... a person who's secure and unlikely to have breaks with reality.  And then the judgements start up...... HAS to be uber competent, like all the men in my family.  That is just..... so judgy and limiting and I SEE it for what it is, but it's still lodged in my gullet.

It's easier to stay above it, untouched by it, unbothered, bc I'm cool with it.  Cooler now than I've ever been, bc I'm not driven to feel guilty for NOTproviding a father for my children any more. They're grown. 

I blathered on, but will close with gratitude for the poem, Hops. 

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 15, 2021, 05:11:12 PM
I hear you, Lighter.
A lot of turbulent water under that huge bridge and you've chosen a strongly-constructed peaceful kayak in the quieter streams. Bravo. I think that's where a lot of us get to, after trauma.

I think the reciprocity I wanted but couldn't have with M was simply, if I said: I am in pain about this....rather than saying "Understood! Let me know when it's over. When can you come for dinner?" -- he (or another) might respond, Want to talk about it? Or if I said, this XXX hurt me, he (or another) -- I'm sorry. Tell me more so I can understand.

No version of that ever happened. Even with the opportunity to learn how with Sikh's help. So that's okay. He did his best up to his limit. I did too. Feels good to have gotten allll the way to releasing it. Took me long enough!

Totally agree with you that no one relationship, romantic or otherwise, can fill all those needs or emotional cravings -- hence a full life with activities/interests/friends/fulfillments that are not laid on one other person. That's just impossible. (Early I felt the most pressure from M who was making me his EVERYTHING with desperate emails/messages/pleas for constant soothing, while I was still making my plans and connecting with others as well as him.) I think -- this makes me laugh -- that having a stroke after battling with him for a solid week and a half over his inability to grasp the damage he was doing by demanding that I explain/justify/narrate/soothe him about my own D... was a hint.

A hint! I should have realized right then that this man, whom I loved, was nonetheless incapable of empathy. Not his fault. I'm not angry. I'm relieved, to have let go the whole thing. (Which had already been whittled from HOUSE, MARRIAGE, SHARED BLISS to...being his best friend he can talk to about anything and keeping him company once a week.)

Too little is as painful as none, in that circumstance. I'm no longer accepting it.

Gonna grab my Johanna and just have fun dancing. The men will explain who they are and I'll observe as best I can without judging and see what is in front of me.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Phyll on August 16, 2021, 12:26:18 PM
Dear Hero Members,

In reading your posts on Relationships I am struck by the supportive and caring relationships you have held with each other for so many years.  This is a gift to be grateful for.  You truly help each other navigate your relationships with others. 

I am so tired of hearing W tell me how self - (absorbed, centered, etc.... fill in the blank) I am.  I told him my decision of going to a funeral service for a family member and he is on a rampage. (See Coronavirus).
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 17, 2021, 10:33:45 PM
And you're here now too, Phyl.

Maybe you'll weather things through a sea change with W, or weather a transition out.

Either way, you'll find good ears, thoughtful minds and kind hearts here.

hugs
Hops

[Added: Back in '07, Doc G clarified. By "main board" he meant this, the Message Board. Hope that helps. Here's the link.]
https://forum.voicelessness.com/index.php/topic,5545.0.html (https://forum.voicelessness.com/index.php/topic,5545.0.html)
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 24, 2021, 05:23:06 PM
Update:

I am completely at peace.
I don't miss the relationship with M.
I am relieved I finally took a clear stand.
I wish him well and do think of him, without any yearning.

I hope he'll find what works for him.

I'm off to find what works for me.

Got back into more connection with church folks, have my date with C Thursday evening (and maybe a winery Friday), and also meeting the writer soon, and have a set date with the woodworker.

Wow.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on August 25, 2021, 07:05:41 AM
Excellent Hops! I hope it's not too taxing physically or draining energy-wise for you. I wish you loads of fun!
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 25, 2021, 09:11:54 AM
Thanks, Amber. I'll pace it out.

I think DC Alpha Man (C) may be overwhelming, so I'm proceeding with feet firmly on brake. Could be cultural, but he's fantasizing and I'm wary of a man getting all "dreamy" before we meet. He hasn't pestered me and calls earlier in the evening (finally) --we had one call recently to confirm date details, fair enough since for him it involves travel -- it's not as intrusive. He's been very slow to comprehend me not wanting to yak on the phone at length before we meet, but I'm being consistent.

The other two gents seem more earthbound, which is a good thing I think. Woodworker and I are meeting halfway (he's about 50 min away) at a casual restaurant and bringing our dogs. Writer and I haven't met yet; ball's in his court but he's in vigil for a grandbaby.

This is healthy stuff, Amber. Taking it lightly.

hugs
Hops

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on August 25, 2021, 11:58:16 AM
I'm so pleased to read your updates, Hops!

And here comes lovely, cool weather to meet outdoors with your dogs....... patio restaurants and parks, even.

You sound so good!

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 25, 2021, 09:17:06 PM
MAN, C is just not getting it! Or not listening. Or not comprehending.

I have no idea. But he just made an excuse to call AGAIN when I've said, I thought pretty directly, that I don't want to keep having phone conversations until we've actually met.

I just don't understand it. Maybe bonding over the phone sight unseen is his comfort zone. Maybe talking to a woman regularly makes him happy. Maybe he just can't understand why wait? No problem, lots of people don't have this boundary. But I do.

I just emailed him I'm not trying to be rude or unfriendly and do look forward to picking him up at the train tomorrow and having a nice dinner. I've already said that. Also said it's just not my preference and I can explain more when we meet. (Wish I didn't have to but it seems necessary.) It's almost spoiled the date before it happens.

Yikes. This may be The Date That Shouldn't Have Happened, but we'll see. He sounded positively wounded as he got off the phone -- this time when I picked up and it was him I said very directly, I got your email today and you offered to call with all the details, but I replied that I don't need more details now--did you get my reply? (He hadn't seen it, just had written again "We'll talk" -- when I don't want to keep talking now!) And I said, happy to be at the station tomorrow to pick you up. He kept saying, You busy? I finally said: C, I've tried to tell you several times that I prefer not to keep having phone conversations until after I've met someone in person, and you keep calling anyway (or something to that effect.)

He evidently heard the frustration in my voice and immediately said that's fine, sorry, I'll see you tomorrow.

Whatever the reason is for his lack of hearing/comprehension/acceptance of my preference, it's trashed the anticipation for me. It's a shame.

Now I'm having familiar thoughts about powerful male dynamos who simply cannot compute that they should respect and cooperate with a woman's clearly stated preference, rather than just keep doing the same thing over and over and over to get what they want. He really either doesn't get it, or can't comprehend it because his whole life he's never had to do that, or he believes repetition creates cooperation.

It's the other way around. Repetition makes me more resistant and uncomfortable because it feels like HOUNDING (maybe he thinks that it's flattering) and if I get a hint of similar attitude tomorrow evening, it'll be a one-off for sure. (I'm pretty certain the communication gap's too wide already but will try to enjoy it anyway.)

Feh. Grrr.

Yoicks,
Hops

PS At his age, it's also possible there's something cognitive going on. It's possible that he literally can't remember what I've said about repeated calls. If I figure out that's the case, I'll be kind to him but not encourage more. If it's physically not his fault I shouldn't be annoyed, just realize that with both geographical and mental distance, this won't be a relationship launch. I will have a lot of compassion for his situation if that's the case, but am too drained to volunteer for it.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 26, 2021, 02:30:04 PM
Well, he emailed "I fully understand" and so forth.
He'd also said that at one other point.

So I still dunno, but at least courtesy is restored so the evening will maybe be okay.

Very strange panicky upset I'd felt about it for a bit; so reminiscent of how I'd feel when M would dismiss something I'd say that was important to me.

Hope it's just a misunderstanding or miscommunication but I'm likelier to believe it's what Lighter talks about -- the "first boundary breach." At least I'm alert to it and I intend to be completely direct. A natural consequence of this continual struggle to get C to hear or take in my preference is that I'm not as relaxed or inclined to trust him as I would've been if he'd respected (or understood) it.

So maybe that's the consequence, or depending how the evening goes, maybe that's the end of it (a consequence in itself). If he has a physical or cognitive reason he can't help, nothing to be upset about. I'll find out.

Maybe it's dregs of prosecutor behavior, too. Sheesh.

Whew. Thanks for listening,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on August 26, 2021, 02:53:08 PM
Oh Hops. Hugs.

You're right; I think, about not very many women making those kinds of preferences clearly known. He could be interpreting that as the opening gambit of a chase game - catch me if you can. Seeing it as a challenge he might be programmed to overcome it, ya know? Not seeing as what it was - your way of keeping things in your comfort zone, according to your rules - could just be inexperience with that approach.

Betcha a nice bourbon, that's what it is.

It could also be he's not used to hearing "no" ever. Caution is prudent, whatever it is, I think. Simple trick we used to use to get out of meetings we knew were going to be tediously, mind & butt-numbingly dull:

An hour or 90 minutes in, pre-arrange for a friend to text you. Excuse yourself to check the phone. Upon return, just say something you must deal with has come up and it's time to call it an evening. He probably knows that trick but it's a non-confrontational way out of a situation if it's getting uncomfortable. Otherwise, if everything's lovely, just say it was important but can wait.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 26, 2021, 03:25:07 PM
Thanks, ((((Amber)))), I needed some input!

You might be right. The old pursue-until-you-win caveman, klonk-it-on-head-until-it-stops-resisting behavior. M did it verbally; exhausting. I could understand it from C's life context, especially from his aggressive-lawyer-millionaire-advisingCongress kind of past. Bully for him. May be naive to expect that in a 70ish former prosecutor, I'd find the mellow mellenial-feminist-inside-a-70ish y/o I actually need!

Hah. And HAH.

I'll enjoy dinner anyway, I imagine. If continuing is for me a No Thank You, just hope he'll accept it pronto. (I can learn to block numbers if I have to.)

I don't need the texting ruse to leave if I gotta leave. If he needs a cab, he can afford one. I AM JOHANNA! (If you didn't watch that video I posted, pleeez do...!)

hugs
HOps
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on August 26, 2021, 06:53:32 PM
I hope you can keep an open mind and remain emotionally distanced from the date, Hops.

Whether this guy is used to speaking, not texting and e mailing.....
whether he's excited and unable to grasp a potential date/mate ISN'T as excited as he is.....
whether he's been raised to be deaf to a woman's thoughts, preferences and needs......
is up in the air.

It will be what it is and you don't have to have a terrible evening whatever the case is.  It's just a short while.  You may excuse yourself at any time, sans excuses.  You'll be in public, ordering good food....... just release expectation and get curious as you can, is my advice.

::fingers crossed you at least like the guy::.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 26, 2021, 11:05:09 PM
It was pleasant.
I had fun.
Talk was lively and interesting.

He was a Ecuadoran who looks Irish, quite a family story (Dad was dying of TB in Ecuador and mother, fearing for how to feed her kids, said her farewell and went to NYC where his aunts were to sponsor her) etc. She plugged him into a Catholic school and went to work in a clothing factory. Tremendous drive. He delivered papers and made it through various state schools to law school...eventually a Big Cheese. Interesting life path, for sure (with the weird echoes to M's I expected, but fortunately not quite the same).

I found him kind of sweet in person. Still not sure I want a suitor but if I still want to in the morning, I said I might take him to a winery. (He'd already added another evening to his itinerary but I'm not committing to that--he didn't ask.)

Pretty sure we can enjoy a few more hours' talk while the weather's good and we can be outside. Anything more complicated (like me heading to DC soon) I'm probably not in the mood for.

No damage, no terror. Just a light evening and mostly good vibes. I did assert myself several times in no faint terms. Him: I'm going to send you a chapter of my memoir....(like so many people I meet who know I edit). Me: I will not be your editor, ever. Him: Not even for money?  Me: I hated my career writing/editing for other people's agendas. I took my talent back and will not use it that way again.

Sigh. I noted the phrasing: "I'm going to send you...." rather than "May I send you....". Sheesh. A lot of people believe that anyone who can write/edit wants to put energy into their personal project -- it's like the doctor at the cocktail party who gets asked for medical advice. Same thing; I don't take it personally. Saying no just feels great.

All survived. Maybe we'll be friends of a sort. Dunno, not worried about it. Whew.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on August 27, 2021, 08:21:25 AM
Glad the first glimpse into what he's really like was pleasant and painless Hops. Negotiations seem to have gone well.

;)
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on August 27, 2021, 10:53:11 AM
Just chiming in really quickly, Hopsie, but your situation just now rang a bell with my recent conversation with T.  I was talking to her about my difficulties with people and relationships in general and she's suggested to me that I put people in categories and keep them for that purpose only - this one's a good laugh and good for coffee chat but I wouldn't discuss x with her, this one's good at advice regarding y but doesn't understand z so I won't discuss z with her, and so on.  I just wondered if that would apply to the early getting to know you stuff with current chaps - getting to a point of, okay, this one is interesting and funny but I'm not getting the zing so this could just be 'dinner once a month' man, this one understood more but I didn't get any romantic thing, he could become 'meet up for a friendly chat' once a man and so on (until Mr 'Ticks All The Important Boxes' comes along).

"I'm going to send you" would have put me off as well, and I don't know about you but I feel like that forces me into something more assertive when I wouldn't necessarily want to be like that?  If the conversation naturally filtered around to "how did you find your editing career to be?" and you could then explain more casually you didn't enjoy it and the next question is then an easier "would you look over something I've written as a favour?", I don't know, I would find that easier and more natural.  I don't know if that's how you feel as well.  I'm glad you've got together anyway and I must admit to feeling relieved that the M spell broke and those heart strings aren't being tugged any more.  I'm glad you've got other irons in the fire, too :) xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 27, 2021, 12:34:09 PM
I like your T's advice, Tupp. It doesn't cover rando-miseries like a laundry room dowager empress, but should cover a LOT of people.

And it's good advice for me too, in terms of men. Thank you. C is smart, interesting, and less pompous than M was. Seems very stubborn and clearly used to making unilateral decisions, so a bigger relationship would likely be a recipe for frustration. But he is present, asked me questions, and also isn't whining about not getting his wish. (Today I decided not to get together -- he independently decided to be here another day and evening and I'd been clear from the get-go I couldn't commit to more time than yesterday's dinner as a first date. So he's on his own today. But because he's older and uses a cane, tomorrow I'm going to take him to breakfast and then to his train. That feels right because he did made the effort to travel to meet. I just don't want to go out today--at my heat-tolerance limit.)

As long as he doesn't start regular evening phone calls, I'd be content to be his friend. His phone personality is not comfortable for me, is all. Not his fault. And I do think a bit of memory problem may explain why he kept it up. A lifetime habit of grabbing the phone whenever you feel the urge? Doesn't matter; my challenge is just to be boundary-consistent. I may have to invest in Caller ID, which annoys me. But would make sense. (I have an eccentric system worked out with local friends: don't text/call my cell, email is great, leave messages on my landline any time.)

You got it right about the editing. It's a lifetime pet peeve but I've learned to be assertive about it. It startles people but it's amazing how many amateur writers instantly assume that my greatest delight would be to pore over their work. No disprespect to them because I love and support the writing urge in anyone; I'm just not giving it away any more OR doing it for pay. It belongs to me now. I built up decades of resentment that may leak out because I hated 90% of my jobs -- writing feature articles and press releases and selling/marketing stuff and basically whoring out writing and editing because those were the only high-end skills I had to offer. I never forgot the crestfallen look on my sculptor ex-H's face when he came home from the stone company office job one day and said, I feel like I'm forced to carve ashtrays all day. It was practically killing his spirit to work there but he had no choice. (He's been in a secure staff University job for years now that he likely enjoys more.) My creative writing withered on the shelf for so many years, what with family work on top of survival work. I often wonder how many artists/writers, especially women, have had the same experience. I'm LUCKY and privileged in a zillion ways but used to fantasize about moving to Ireland, which subsidizes artists and writers (or used to). Rambling, rambling.

C wasn't offended when I made that one-sentence-speech, fortunately. It just came out honest. You're right too, that if he'd posed it as a question instead of a presumption, it would've been easy to explain. I wouldn't mind READING his first memoir chapter --it'd be very interesting. Just don't wanna edit it.

Meanwhile, I just wrote a piece for the church blog about fear (isolation coming again this winter due to Covid, and the state of the world) and a lot of stuff about culture changes, social media and elders. Wound it up with an invitation for anyone feeling lonely to let me know, and I'd gladly call or email. Then: "And now I'm not feeling lonely any more -- funny how that works!"

I've proposed to the minister a plan for reaching out to isolated elder-elders. My friend at the church died alone in his apartment. I fear others might too, and as a community, it's way too easy for elders living alone to go neglected. I'm clearly projecting my own fears but also know that others are suffering loneliness in silence (me, I get naked with my feelings in public -- the piece will go on the church blog -- and I'm okay with that). In that sense, I feel it's a contribution and she did too. Wants to meet with me to talk about a plan, and I've volunteered to coordinate it.

Yup, the M spell is just gone. Blessizheart. I miss parts of it but on balance feel almost complete relief. I do worry about the upcoming winter, but hanging onto that lopsided friendship is not going to be the right way to get through it.

Have missed your voice and crave your updates, Tupp. Hope the settling in process is continuing in peace and I know you'll need to rest a LOT before you feel normal again. I was telling poet friend, who was feeling brittle and exhausted, that I think she should look at six months to a year after her overwhelming effort to find a place and move herself and the partner...before it's purely home, comforting and relaxing. If she sees it as a normal recovery thing that just takes a while, it may be easier to climb through the hard moments.

Hugs to you and NY Son,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 27, 2021, 11:06:03 PM
The C experience ended quite nicely. When he got my breakfast + ride email, he replied later that the heat drove him away and he had already left on an earlier train. I'm relieved.

He said it was worth the effort to come and hopes we'll stay in touch. I replied that by email (but not calls) that'd be fine by me. And I apologized for the ungracious won't-be-your-editor-ever remark and said I'd enjoy reading a chapter, just couldn't offer an edit.

Glad I met him and glad he's gone. Wouldn't mind seeing him again sometime, but no energy toward it for now. I also think he's too old for me. Seems like dog years when you get to your 70s....

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on August 28, 2021, 02:45:10 AM
It sounds like a good and sensible first date, Hopsie - just checking each other out, minimal expectations and I think you're right to avoid a telephone based relationship before meeting.  Very easy to build things into something they aren't and then the temptation is to make it fit instead of just accepting it's not a Grade A situation.  Good to keep in touch and have another winter email contact (and maybe safe winter get together if it's wanted).  A winter network sounds as necessary as a lockdown larder, I think :)  I'm glad it's gone well and hasn't been anything terrible to endure xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on August 28, 2021, 08:56:04 AM
For a lot of people, that winter network would help a lot. Even a confirmed happy hermit like myself could use the interaction. Hol could definitely use the inquiries from her friends - usually it's the other way around and she's starting to resent it. She's starting to work thru it. There is no such thing as a casual meetup with anyone out here.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on August 28, 2021, 12:52:26 PM
Whew, so glad the date went OK.

Re connecting to your church, in ways you enjoy, sounds very hopeful and satisfying for you.

You sound so good!

Yay.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 02, 2021, 02:11:37 PM
Finally. I've found my new man.
(The one on the right.)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PEVaIXwL6o&list=PLBmzY_egKQboqmInge55OpvGNMPXrJc4c&index=10 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PEVaIXwL6o&list=PLBmzY_egKQboqmInge55OpvGNMPXrJc4c&index=10)
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on September 03, 2021, 08:38:19 AM
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.

I wish he didn't have shades on so I could see his eyes.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 03, 2021, 10:29:45 AM
Just check out Jacob's Ridge by searching that on YouTube.

There's one with a traumatized new rescue (white coat, sunburned nose) that he just sits with and talks to gently for about 20 minutes, telling him about the future being different from the past, and slowly this scared and depressed creature just heals while you're watching. It's the voice and how he touches him. Watching the animal's trust literally unfold in real time, and how he expresses it (head on shoulder, gradually relaxing) is really lovely.

Sigh. Oh, and the guy's vegan.

Had my meet with the woodworker last night and really enjoyed it. Fascinating person. Lived through a very rough/poor father-free childhood, has all sorts of issues (dyslexia, depression history, two divorces, heart surgery and cancer) and has wonderful talent...built the entire gorgeous interior of the restaurant. He owns his own business and property and lives in his shop -- just recently got indoor running water for it.

(We ordered inside but ate outdoors, lovely.) What I liked about him most is how open he is. He is open about himself and his struggles and completely unpretentious. I sensed a bit of resentment toward women in his profile but it may have been more frustration. Dunno if that's present or just scarring. He does a lot of work for ultra-rich people and undervalues himself severely (this is NOT $20/hour skill but his lack of self-worth; there's been lifetime shame/insecurity). He's 5' tall.

I think he'd be a good friend and also somebody I might be tempted to try to heal and rescue. If friendship helps, I'd be pleased to get to know him. I'm not drawn in other ways so far but really admired him for multiple reasons (his talent and his mature openness about himself and his life). And I told him so.

This is a healthy thing to do, is all. I don't think he and I are quite on the same page about masks. He said oh yes, I've got my mask right here (in the car) but didn't wear it when we were waiting to order inside the place, or afterward (I hadda go pee before I left and saw him, maskless, settling in for anothe beer at the bar). What with friend across the street so ill and the odd inconsistency, I am not sure he fully grasps the reality of microscopic particles and how instant infection can be.

Anyway, I'll definitely visit his shop sometime. He's making me a wooden spoon and brought the wood to show me. (I hinted.)

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on September 03, 2021, 12:13:56 PM
Hmmmm. Sounds promising. Even with certain things noted.

I get the impression, with his dedication to his craft, that he spends - and prefers to spend - a lot of time alone. Just being in his own "zone" and doing what he's good at. A great many women have issues about that; the ones with dependency/control issues anyway. He's probably sensitive to criticism that he's not attentive enough to their needs, ya know? It might be a little awkward figuring out to spend time together if you both require a larger than average amount of solo space & time -- but it might also be surprisingly joyful to find out it IS possible.

He's managed to survive this long on his own. Being "rescued" might not be very welcome. Then, there's that male pride thing too. Being open about his difficulties may be the strategy he's chosen to scare off anyone who isn't going to be authentic themselves. And perhaps, he'd just like to be acknowledged for how far he's come now from the past?

Very few relationships are begun on the first meeting. Even with me & B - we both know that kind of physical attraction is no solid basis for relationship. That started AFTER; I'd say we gave it serious thought that first year of separation and kept paying attention to each other... and how we felt about what we observed, and saw. There was a long "wait & see" period before even the idea of commitment was taken seriously.

If you do see him again, I'd try an experiment. Tell him how you feel about masks and why. See if he listens; and actually hears you without trying to change your mind. That kind of behavior is important to you in all your relationships - just differing degrees, depending on relationship. Take the risk, experiment, roll the dice... while it's early days, to find out more about him.

He sounds kinda close to the "type" of guy in the rescue farm. Did he just talk about himself without asking about you, waiting for you to make a "presentation"? Or did he take a genuine interest in your writing and how you spend your days?
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 03, 2021, 12:34:41 PM
Hmmm. I'm thinking just friendship, genuinely. Nothing "lesser" about that. He didn't ask a lot of questions about me but the talk flowed. I was a fascinated listener. Told him enough about myself. He didn't register much reaction but I do think there's a general hurt/possible resentment about women. Not curious.

I don't see him as someone I would build a real partnership with. Nothing wrong with him and many admirables, but there's not enough in common and he does live as he lives. He's got no resources other than a building filled with prize wood. He does have family and they're urging him to build himself an actual home, but he can't afford to. He used an outhouse for the last 17 years. I'm flexible but too bougie to go quite that frontier.

We both said to each other we were looking for new friends and I'm not sniffing for a romance possibility here. Would be happy to spend time with him again, and already wrote him about my not-on-same-page-re.-masks observation. No judgement, just explained I'm hyper-cautious so am being guided for now by the damn delta. I'll see how he responds. For me for now, no fantasizing or impulse to. It was just a nice and rewarding adventure to meet and talk for two hours.

THIS is the one (gonna plonk it on Tupp's thread too)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtFwEofmNrg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtFwEofmNrg)

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 03, 2021, 10:22:03 PM
OMG, now I'm torn between Justin and Ronnie. Obsessed.

This is pure hilarity.
Finding belly laughs in the middle of How the World is Going is priceless!!!

Enjoy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isemHch23Ac (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isemHch23Ac)

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 20, 2021, 01:34:14 PM
Couple friendly dates. Wounded bird but beautifully self-aware man (he's done loads of therapy for years), woodworker. Met him once near where he lives, invited him to patio-sit for a brew a couple nights ago.

Enjoyed talking to him for two hours each time and he's going to be a good friend, I can tell. This counts a lot.

Upcoming maybe-date with an attractive man I'd responded to saying, I'm honestly intimidated by your fitness stuff since I've gained 20 lbs since my pic...no harm at all in changing your mind! He responded: actually, I can't run marathons any more due to an arthritic knee and I responded because your eyes sparkle when you smile and I'd still like to meet you. !!!!!  That was nice.

On it goes, slowly and at whatever pace appears and feels right.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on September 20, 2021, 02:09:26 PM
Nice, Hops.  Sounds really positive on both counts....woodworker and ex marathon runner.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 29, 2021, 08:55:22 AM
Well, very very odd that it's happening but it continues. Woodworker already feels like a friend, so I'm glad about that. After all the quarantining and such is past I'll go visit his shop sometime. Not in a rush though because he lives in a rural, mask-resistant area. He's talked about it and I think has difficulty asserting it for people who come in his shop. (I encouraged him to put up a sign but I think he'd find that difficult. It's such a shame.) Anyway, I do hope he stays well so we can get to know each other more.

Today meeting for coffee a man who lives downtown near me and intrigues me for two reasons: 1) he's Scottish (can't help it, Tupp, like every ditsy Anglophile I do love the U.K. accents!) and 2) he's been a widower for 5 years after a 45-year marriage. #1 is just silly but #2 often means: this person is unafraid of commitment and has learned something about life via relationship. Not always true of course but maybe a better bet than someone with a divorce or two (like me). He also seems to have a sense of humor which would be VERY refreshing.

Couple days from now meeting someone who's also local, friendly but not pushy. His profile indicated a lot of athleticism and marathon running and I honestly thought he was out of my league -- told him why too. Did I tell y'all the thing about the photos? I added a few current ones and mentioned I feel self-conscious about my pandemic weight, and he responded he'd been interested because my eyes sparkle when I smiled (and he can't run marathons anyway any more due to an arthritic knee.) I thought his attitude was kind and ressuring.

That's it...no (well other than the Scot) fantasies but will try to the enjoy the reality of coffee with strangers, and I usually do!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on September 29, 2021, 09:39:11 AM
Well I'm liking the sound of these various dates, Hopsie!  They all sound a bit more suitable than M, whether for coffee, friendship or some more.  I'm glad they're at least nice conversations and you're not having to batter anyone off with a broom handle or anything :) I like that Marathon Man mentioned your sparkly eyes.  I now have visions of you arriving for your date with your eyelashes enlarged and bejewelled, like Miss Piggy ;)  Lol.  I hope they all continue to give you nice social opportunities and get that network in place before winter sets in xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on September 29, 2021, 09:40:26 AM
Haha... I think I'd be sorely tempted to fantasize about the Scot too. In that way, I'm pretty sure Outlander has ruined a lot of women for the reality of stubborn, hard-headed Scottish men. I don't think there's any cure either. Let me know if ya find one!
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on September 29, 2021, 09:44:08 AM
Good morning, Hops.

In this house, we call funny men "giggle boys. "

We like giggle boys.


Will pooch tag along for coffee?  Do you walk to the shops?

Lighter



Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 29, 2021, 10:58:54 AM
Pooch definitely. She's a demanding screener. (Demands pats. It's a low bar.)

I walk partway. Too out of shape for the full walk, to my shame. I park a block or two away and zig through the park to make sure Pooch is empty before we hit the pedestrian Mall. It's lovely.

Thanks for the good luck wishes, y'all. Tupp, you're right. It is a feeling of gathering a network before winter.

I might be less afraid to have someone over even indoors if I knew them well enough to trust their vax status, masking practice, etc. (Having just gotten my booster or 3rd shot, I'm feeling a bit less anxious myself.)

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on September 29, 2021, 02:03:46 PM
Lol....demanding screener. 

Demands pets. 

But seriously, would it impact your perception of coffee mate if pooch didn't like the the guy?

Our pug is the same, EXCEPT for this one female neighbor.  All these years....always the same.  Never warms up.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 29, 2021, 05:51:08 PM
Probably but not religiously.
She nipped at the ankles of a long-term generous female friend once, early on.

That friend isn't a particularly sensitive person and has some kinds of thinking (think traditional + Southern) that I'm not too fond of. But she is also loyal, reliable and does a lot of good.

Dunno what Pooch picked up on but in one of a good handful of female friends, it didn't shake me. If she reacted that way to a male, however, I'd have to give it serious pause.

She really liked the Scotsman. I enjoyed him too but about fell over when he told me he was a medievalist. !!!!! Are they proliferating?? Fortunately, he was much less freaky that M had been on a first date (really not at all so), and spent most of his career (and still consults) in nonprofits. Doing good, iow. We had a nice time and will do lunch soon. He asked a few questions about me and seemed open. Still twinging from losing his wife I'm sure. We got along and there it is. Nothing more and nothing less.

Present moment, good! Afterward, walked down to see my galpal in her condo and hung out on her ridiculously huge corner terrace and yakked a lot, and Pooch was angelic. We walked the long way both ways and I feel great about it. Anxiety gone.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on September 29, 2021, 06:52:17 PM
Medievalist as in.... art and cultural enthusiast of that period, Or....
 LARPing the battle of Flodden?  I'm hoping he wears a kilt and runs around waving wooden swords SO HARD.

::Happy happy happy you had a good day!::.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 29, 2021, 07:45:38 PM
PhD from and later on professor at Hahvahd. (Earlier degrees from a Scottish university.) It's just his academic field. Not the same sub-specialization area as M, thank gawd. He gradually worked into nonprofits, held key positions in a major national philanthropic foundation and became arts commissioner for a major city. He developed an early program on climate change in the mid-80s (!) and focuses now on a program he developed for creative arts that's still going strong. His mind seems very sharp and so far his personality seems open and honest. Jury's out.

I like it that he was the first university grad in a working-class family and THEN wound up in big-deal circles, rather than moving straight into all that from a priviliged upper-crust upbringing. He's very intelligent and not a snob. Anyhow, it was a nice lunch and I enjoyed meeting him. No more no less, and no kilts! Pooch felt very comfortable with him.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on September 29, 2021, 08:12:15 PM
So no LARPing?🥺
JK, though ...
if there were kilts,
he'd be as interesting as our Hopsy.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 29, 2021, 10:09:27 PM
Hafta admit I dunno what larping is OR anything about the battle of Flodden...

Ignoramously,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on September 30, 2021, 08:12:01 AM
I think Lighter meant Cullodden, Hops.
I'll let her explain LARPing; it's some kind of dress-up or role play thing. (I don't get out much, LOL).
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on September 30, 2021, 09:17:27 AM
LARPING is Live Action Role Playing and I was pictuing men running around on a field of imagined battle.

 Some in Kilts. 

The reality is the opposite of LARPing.

Lighter



Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 30, 2021, 09:11:12 PM
My British poet friend was very helpful when she called today and I told her about the Scot.

Scottish men, like quite a few English men too, she said (half her family's Scottish) tend to be careful and guarded at first, and not romantic and feets-off-sweeping or that sort of thing. They take their time but once they DO decide about you (if it's a Yes) then they are the kind of friend/whatever you can count on forever. Or something like that.

It made a lot of sense. And I liked hearing this.

So far, we (me and Scot) both acknowledged we really enjoyed our meet and that he'd get in touch when ready (I offered that). So he feels no pressure and I'm leading with patience because There Is No Rush. No floods of verbiage. Good!

I'm just really pleased I met him. Hope he's motivated and/or ready enough to continue seeing me, but I could also tell that he is still deeply rocked by the loss of his wife whom he loved and shared his life with for 45 years. Must've been awful. They were here visiting his son, happy tourists, and she fell to a sudden aneurism. Boom. Gone. He just said "it was awful" and that it had taken him many months to even feel "in compos mentis" again. My heart went out to him. He had almost never lived alone so he's been through fire in the last several years.

And tomorrow I meet yet a different man. Likewise light approach and friendly, I think. And this is good.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Phyll on September 30, 2021, 11:06:24 PM
You all are too funny!  I do not know what larping, culloden, or the battle of Flodden mean.  I am enjoying hearing about your dates Hops.  I admire your courage and discernment in this dating process.  It sounds hopeful and fun.  I would definitely let the pooch weigh in... 
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on October 01, 2021, 09:11:06 AM
Hops, I'll just say this about your Scot friend... 5 years post-Mike, there are still residual echoes of the old stuff. It's not debilitating; I do have to fight to maintain the space to continue letting it go (thanks Hol; stuffing my life full of "new" never worked before, why should it work now?) And I notice all kinds of tiny things coming up - still - interacting with B that require the unstructured, unfilled time to just "feel" my way through.

Maybe just feeling my way through to what is "me"... ya know? Because though no doubt your friend's experience & mine are different, I never lived alone before Mike died either. I was always "combined" in a relationship, making those compromises, etc that one does in relationship. I don't think I'm all that solid in "who I am" yet... but I am getting there.

So, give this new guy his time & space to deal with those things, his way. I like your new dating strategy overall. I think it's perfectly tailored to what your real needs are. It honors your strength & independence & curiosity about the world & people. Happy "shopping"!  ;)
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on October 01, 2021, 11:36:25 AM
Hops:

I like the sound of your poet friend's experience with Scots.

Sorry he's reeling from his deeply felt loss....will likely be reeling for a while.

You're both open to new connection and that can be enough.

Looking forward to updates.  I love reading you and pooch have energy for walks in town. 

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 01, 2021, 02:48:22 PM
Thanks, (((((y'all))))).
I am trying to be open but carry things lightly as I meet anybody.

I noticed as I met the Scot that I felt comfort, a sense of equality. Too early to be sure.

As to the guy I'm meeting today, I'm nervous (just somewhat intimidated). His pix show perfect children, and an attractive and very fit man. He did respond well to my openness. I just dunno.

But I ain't freaking out. I'm feeling more comfortable these days just showing up, and just being myself. Open to what happens and more accepting of what doesn't.

Will report back!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 01, 2021, 08:10:21 PM
Mr. Lovely (fit guy) turns out to be a sweet and humble veterinarian who's very very Christian (which I'm not) and that's too bad, because he's quite attractive and totally into animals (Pooch loved him) and we talked for more than 3 hours and so on....

I'll probably see him again as a FRIEND but the religion thing is a big barrier to anything more most likely. Too bad. He's appealing in a lot of ways but I fear all the creepy stuff.

Hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on October 02, 2021, 09:05:33 AM
Too bad about the religious stuff.  I feel it's sort of comforting and safe, at times, when good men really believe they'll go to hell for acting on impulses, but understand the fear. 

Wolves cloaked in religion have bitten me more than once.

I was thinking about the marching orders to go share Jesus with others.  Brilliant, marketing strategy but very concerning when it's pointed right at me.
WHY does this person want me or anyone to think they're a "good" Christian? 

Sorry it was creepy, Hops.

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 02, 2021, 10:56:55 AM
Actually it wasn't creepy to be with him for this occasion, Lighter. Only sign of his religiosity I noticed was sad eyes and I think wafts of guilt coming across and a mention of himself as a sinner.

What I meant by "creepy" is that I WOULD fear getting involved with someone who's soaking themselves in that kind of evangelicalism. I recognize it and know what would come up for me. Not his fault and he should stay where he finds the comfort.

I'm pining for the Scot (kidding) and thinking after a month has lapsed I'll send him one email and just ask for clarity: he's the one who mentioned getting together for "lunch." If I don't hear even a lunch suggestino soon I'll figure he's either: 1) dating around or someone else, 2) not attracted to me as a potential partner in the first place, or 3) not ready emotionally.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 02, 2021, 11:55:55 PM
Heard from the Scot! He wants lunch week after next. Mentioned he's setting up "dog play dates" for his pooch while her usual walker is away. So I mentioned that once we know if he and Pooch are compatible, his dog could also come play in my yard, though Pooch's not much for playing rough. Had fun telling him "a little preemptive forgiveness might be in order...."

We'll see if he's interested in that, but regardless I'm delighted I'll be seeing him again.

Woo and hoo,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 03, 2021, 06:36:31 AM
PS The veterinarian is involved with a local church that was seeded and is supported by a famous very right-wing and mega-rich (all those tithes) Xian "university" (which has no academic respect) that has intentionally worked to plant its graduates in every government office they can be hired into, along with all sorts of influential other places. I consider that institution a festering fascism farm and absolutely fear what it's already contributed to undermining our democracy, which is teetering on its last legs.

No matter how "nice" he is, I think the good doggie doc is absolutely brainwashed and is volunteering for more of it. I think it's nice that we had such an enjoyable date and conversation, but it was the first and last one for me.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on October 03, 2021, 07:49:20 AM
Well now, that's happy news about your Scot! Excellent....
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on October 03, 2021, 04:23:11 PM
Woo hoo!  Glad you're pleased, Hops.

I adore the vision of you and Pooch walking through lovely fall breezes to have lunch and fellowshing with the Scott.  Playdates in the yard, with that fancy fire pit. 

Ya.
::nodding::.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on October 12, 2021, 11:49:23 PM
How are things going with the boys, Hops?


Is the weather beautiful there?  It's glorious here...perfect for walks. 

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 13, 2021, 08:57:36 AM
Hi Lighter --
The Scot had to cancel lunch as he's gotta bad cold, but we'll be rescheduling after I get back. Leaving for beach today, and so unready! Slept thru alarm. Just now having enough tea to pry eyes open. It'll all work out.

It's gray and foggy here today so far. The beach will be partly cloudy low 70s today and tomorrow (my idea of perfect), warmer (78) and sunny Friday and we leave Saturday).

Really looking forward to this getaway.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on October 13, 2021, 02:58:46 PM
I just landed in Florida, Hops.  A good day to travel.
You're right....it will work out.

We're going to see lemurs and do yoga with bunnies.  I know you'll have a wonderful trip.  Is pooch with you?  I saw a lady with a Maltese in each arm at the airport.  Hands full!

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 13, 2021, 08:43:30 PM
Nope, Pooch is home with her friendly dogsitter, my kind friend who's also in my Covenant Group. Plus she's a solid (and long) 20 lbs so I couldn't tote her for long in the crook o' my arm.

Yup, all will change and all will be well.

Speaking of Relationships, I'm renewing my fondness for this wacky group of UU women. We're all vaxxed and boosted-as-applicable and tested negative...so we're hanging out in this huge house mask free. HOPE it's safe but sure am enjoying it.

And the ocean view is right out front and absolutely gorgeous. With beach as far as the eye can see we've spotted about 3 people. Sooooo lovely. I'm happy to be here!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on October 14, 2021, 09:10:58 AM
I'm staying with my niece and her bf in 90degree still Florida.  We ate Thai outdoors last night.....beautiful and breezy with bats flying about...I can't take the heat of the day, or....I don't want to anymore. 

I'm glad you're enjoying face to face fellowship In a group again.  Soak it up and keep updating. 

Sometimes we think an it flying with the pug, but she's 5 lbs bigger than your pooch!  Chubby pug!

Lighter



Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on October 14, 2021, 12:22:40 PM
Which beach did y'all go to Hops?
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 14, 2021, 12:24:08 PM
I'll PM with info.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 16, 2021, 01:06:30 PM
Beach gathering was 90% delightful, even with 10 women so different from each other. Long tradition in this group of ridiculous sarcastic banter which I adore hearing (rapid fire, too). I love listening to them get into it while they play cards. I don't enjoy cards so just hang out and it is FUN.

Bed wasn't comfy but, feh, rentals. One incident was tough but I feel okay about the aftermath. One woman there who knows my D story well has her own...she lost her beloved girl to suicide four-five years ago. She absolutely cracked with anguish and I was among those who supported her and listened during the peak of it. Reached out to her several times since and enjoyed our emailing. Anyway, she'd moved away right after her loss but comes back for the annual beach thing. She is VERY bright and verbal...kind of free-associates long detailed stories that are very entertaining and interesting, although the never-pause delivery can be wearing. I have always liked her (maybe with a little wariness) and really looked forward to seeing her again. She's closer to several others in the group, long term.

For some reason being with all of us from her old community must have stirred up fresh unhappiness (she hasn't yet really found her tribe in NC and perhaps moved away from her support system too soon) and discontent, on top of all the reminders of the people around her when it happened (her D had been hospitalized in Germany and on a daypass jumped to her death). Absolutely ghastly for friend, who sobbed all the way across the Atlantic in the arms of kind flight attendants.

Long story shorter: I wasn't saying anything at all at that moment as a group conversation was going, with friend talking a good deal about how hard that year had been, with her characteristic great intensity. I was just listening and nodding with empathy (and feeling it) like everyone else. After somebody said, "Raise your hand if you were a perfect mother" and one woman did as a joke and the rest of us including me just kept listening, she suddenly turned and looked over at me and said nastily: "Well we ALL know YOU screwed up as a parent!" Out of the blue.

I was dumbstruck. I heard later a few others were too. I let it pass instantly, feeling that she was projecting out of the intense feelings of chaos and anguish she was trying to cope with in that moment. But it did shock me and hurt. A little later I said gently, "I don't think I screwed up as a parent, though I made plenty of mistakes. It's a little hard to predict mental illness or what it can do." And then the moment passed. (Another woman told me later I handled it with grace, so whew.)

I forgave her instantly but also recognized that I probably won't be able to relax or let down my guard around her again. Words really can wound if you go for the most vulnerable place. I don't think she planned it or realized how hurtful a thing it'd be to say to me, because her own pain is so acute she cannot see outside. I really do understand that and feel very badly for her. Still, being in a group of women (always a tiptoe thing for me because of the early-life girl-bullies stuff) it was a bummer to have to negotiate that particular moment.

I did though. And I think pretty well. I still look forward to going again next year. It's definitely a good laboratory for me to work on how much to assert in groups of women, when to let stuff go, and just observe the group dynamic in them and how I interact with it myself. (For some reason I'm bulletproof with men in groups--I think because I truly do not care about their approval. I'm more vulnerable with women.)

On this annual trip there's enough silliness and lively interesting talk and the sense of all of us belonging to a larger thing (the local UU community) that makes it worthwhile and eases my isolation. I'm happy I got a spot and will be saving up every month to be able to go next time -- for a whole week.

In a way it made me feel like I had my church family back. I'm grateful, I need these people and most of them like and a few love me. That's a nice thing! I learn a lot more about them and myself every time I'm around them, and this visit I got closer to a couple. Really glad about that.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on October 17, 2021, 04:55:03 AM
I'm sorry she did that, Hopsie, what a nasty and unnecessary thing to say.  And how fortunate for her that you didn't retaliate - you could have destroyed her but chose not to.  I hope at some point she realises that and offers some kind of apology.  I suspect (with my amateur psychologist head on) that she feels her daughter's suicide was her fault and that she screwed up as a parent, and shoved that out in your direction.  Very unfair.  I'm glad the rest of the trip was good though, and that you can go again next year xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on October 17, 2021, 10:04:12 AM
I think life (and people) bring these experiences to us to teach us that none of us get to live without conflict or risk - much as we think we'd like to, it's not really good for us. We are designed to work for and create what we want/need. And fight for our selves, too. To create our own safety.

No matter what is going on outside of us.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 17, 2021, 01:39:12 PM
Thanks, Tupp.
I think you're right that it was pure projection.

It's even occurred to me that in her own unique way (in good times even, she relates stories her with a sarcastic edge and laughs at the awfulness of people) -- perhaps her subconscious tossed out that remark as a kind of id-y way to express some sort of bonding with me? I dunno. FELT like a lashing-out, but psyches are complicated.

Surely she knew how deeply I empathized. Her D had the same illness mine does. Hers was just less controlled and defeated her in the end. My D could meet the same fate, and friend knew how much I resonated with her. We had talked about it quite a bit on a few occasions.

Or it may have been a lashing-out because in her mind, it's not fair that my D (with same mental illness) still lives and hers didn't survive. Unconscious, all of it, I think.

Doesn't matter. I'm not angry. Wary, but I don't know how one could not forgive something ugly erupting out of a mother who's experienced nature's ugliest loss.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 17, 2021, 01:41:17 PM
I like that, Amber. Extremely helpful for me to ponder this on many levels and about many circumstances.

Quote
We are designed to work for and create what we want/need. And fight for our selves, too. To create our own safety.

Thank you. Mucho.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 23, 2021, 01:49:54 PM
Back to the more fun side of relationships (at least in early days): Men!

Date #2 with Scot yesterday went really well. I'd suggested my favorite open-air (open-sided tent) restaurant which is a combo of good food and relaxed, upretentious atmosphere (often hard to find here). He really liked being there and patted Pooch the whole time.

Talk was easier, and enjoyable (such an interesting life -- he's still consulting with the last big foundation as person in charge of theater grants, so four times/year he's up to his eyebrows in scripts from new playwrights). He still does a bit of foreign relations advising in DC too but I don't know what form or frequency.

But he didn't talk in that pompous way about himself I'm so used to, LOL. He just talked and I did too and he listened pretty well. I said that I have no family "in my life" and he didn't ask further questions, which was a relief. I'll get around to telling him about my D but it's nice to be slower about the gut-spilling. He has two sons (one, with 4 y/o grand-D, lives here w/his family) and one still in the U.K. I think.
I kind of liked it that family was in proportion in his conversation since a lot of people my age I meet talk only about that. He's had a broad and very interesting life and remarkable friends so I think it'd be lovely if it goes further. As of now.

One revelation that I am sitting with is that while I had a beer I noticed he didn't so I just asked (I am direct about stuff but in a kind voice): I see you're not drinking, does that mean you're teetotalling or sober? He said yes and that when his wife of 45 years died suddenly 5 years ago he went completely off the rails and realized within six months that he'd become full-blown alcoholic, went to rehab and joined AA and has been sober for the last 4 and a half years. I just said good for you! We talked about it generally and he seemed quite comfortable owning it. Even mentioned the cultural thing (Scotsmen drink too much in the first place) and he said it was funny but a TV show about a pathologist turned out to be very helpful, made him think more about what the alcohol was doing to his body.

I think he's fought his way back to life after horrific shock and grief he wasn't prepared for. I also brought up how boys are socialized: macho, invulnerable, stoic and he was nodding away, which I found encouraging. Told him my obsessions include culture and how people are formed, inner layers etc.

Afterward he dropped me at my car (his was reassuringly full of dog hair) and said we'll get together again. His emails are about 10 words long and so far he hasn't called, but he's got a stack of scripts to do for his consulting thing.

I'm going to remain mindful of what poet friend said: careful and guarded, but once into you, they're rocks. I kind of hope he WILL become "into" me, but it may be that he's looking for friendship only. I wouldn't turn that down but need to be cautious, as I'm already feeling excitement about him (not just wait-and-see energy, which is the one I need to tap into.)

I need y'all's encouragement to keep my foot calmly on the brakes, pleeeez. But so far so good and I'm pleased about this. Still DEFINITELY need to consider myself in info-gathering and slow and cautious mode. I have no way of knowing whether he's dating others or whatever might be the case, since I haven't asked.

Maybe our next encounter would be a time to ask a little more directly what he's searching for (why he was online). His first message only said: I never thought I'd be looking for anything other than simple companionship now. Interesting, as it left unspoken what he IS looking for.

Me, same old same old. I want it all, the full commitment, enchilda, shared life and even the ceremony. Not saying that's with Scot, way too early, but my overall reason for dating now hasn't changed. (M played unaware but I'd told him explicitly from the get-go. He just wasN't caring enough to weigh his impact on my dream.) Hopefully, the Scot will handle my heart with care and that I will know better than to hand it over too soon.

Happy about this despite the necessity of risk and vulnerability. Me, big girl now.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on October 23, 2021, 04:20:12 PM
Eh, sounds like you're doing a good enough job restraining yourself on your own Hops. You like him, he likes you... and it's OK for now, if ya both date some other people. Maybe you could propose a date in his stomping grounds, if it's not too far away?
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 23, 2021, 06:45:39 PM
Thanks, Amber.
He lives about a mile away and the easy place to meet is downtown or near there.
I'll find out if he'll invite me to something else (he did mention he loves to cook).

I'm just going to wait to hear from him once he climbs out of his plays-reviews pile. Could invite him to my house but for some reason, I'd rather wait until he unpeels a bit himself. I find it intense to invite someone to my home so try to time that.

Basically, since I'm already visibly enthusiastic (or more extroverted), I wanna wait to risk more vulnerability.

I'm okay dating others too but there's no action on the website at the mo'. I have paused actively looking and just wait until somebody's motivated to write me an actual message rather than a click-automated one.

It's all good. Happy to hear you see me as functioning pretty well with it. So far.

:)
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 24, 2021, 02:09:30 PM
Sigh.
The Scot wrote me a very ethical and admirable message explaining that I have been the only person he's contacted or seen from the dating site, and he's realized that after his 45-yr happy marriage he's just better off being alone, though he'd like to be friends ("nothing structured").

I thanked him for his honesty and told him only he knows what's best for him. Also, began my reply saying "Oh gosh, I knew I was transparently over-enthusiastic." Told him I've been alone too long and would like that to change but am grateful that he was so honest. And okay, I'll be his friend.

We'll see if he actually responds or offers actual friendship. I'm sad about it but MUCH MUCH prefer an honest, ethical man saying "I'm not able to do this" rather than stringing me alone with fairy tales.

I am sad. This will pass. Back in the saddle.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on October 24, 2021, 03:04:31 PM
I'm sorry, Hopsie.  It is good he's been so honest but it's still a disappointment, I know.  I will continue to keep all things crossed that Mr Hops is tap dancing his way to you somehow.  I get endlessly frustrated with things that can't be controlled (like people! Lol).  I hope you are okay xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 24, 2021, 04:30:52 PM
Thanks, dear ((((((Tupp)))))).

I'm weepy and drinking beer (probably not a very mature reaction).

But it'll be okay. Time fixes nearly everything.

I appreciate your kind response, given all you're dealing with.

big hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on October 24, 2021, 08:54:45 PM
Sorry that happened, Hops.

With some distance, I guess he's experiencing all the little and great pants if mourning, guilt, shock, disbelief and anger accompanying the death of a long term and beloved mate.

Since you're his first date, maybe he'll work through some of his stuff.....surely, friend's will tell him quitting right away isn't rational. 

Relaxed, friendly fellowship, sans pressure and expectation, might provide him space to grasp his new life and seek out joy.

It sounds like he's punishing himself for outliving his wife to me.  Rolling around in what he's lost, like a little dog in it's mess and that's part of getting through it, ime. 

Whatever it is, you sound really grounded and happy right now which is likely why he wanted to see you a second time.....even if he's just not ready to "date" date.

Just be a light in his world and keep being your happy self, ((Hops.)). That he's an honest Scot is a good thing, imo.

 People like being around folks who make them feel better/good.  Remember boundaries and keep seeking joy.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on October 25, 2021, 10:02:29 AM
Oh Hops.... this isn't a rejection, OK? It's an admission that he's feeling uncomfortable with his own feelings about what he wants. It's good he respects you enough to be honest about it. What Lighter wrote jumped out at me:

Quote
sounds like he's punishing himself for outliving his wife to me.  Rolling around in what he's lost, like a little dog in it's mess and that's part of getting through it, ime.

This DOES happen; I've wrestled this myself. And it is possible to get through to the other side to live & love again. I'd say be the best friend to him, you can be - for now. Let him - help him - gain perspective and his sense of loyalty to himself back (ie, self esteem). At his own speed and interest. And see where things lead.

My best relationships have been with men, I was "friends" with first.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 25, 2021, 12:44:27 PM
I think y'all are Really Really Wise Women. Thank you!

Poet friend said to me: what've you got to lose if you are just honest and tell him you Really Like him? She thinks sometimes men don't know so why not? (While accepting and supporting his need to take care of himself; iow, his honest way of handling whatever he was feeling -- which unfortunately made me like him even more.) So I did, with humor and reassurance we could manage friendship. He wrote back assuring me again and very directly -- it'snotyouit'sme -- and said he'd be calling after a week in NYC. I bet he will since I think his character's good. I've used humor throughout so am not dumping drama on him.

I think you've given golden advice. Be his friend and see what happens.

I think one reason I had a weepy time about it was I was so disappointed in MYSELF. I talk big about info-gathering, not fantasizing and being all Judith-Sillsy, but I fail at that over and over. I'm losing confidence that I'm even capable of suppressing/hiding those hopes. So I worry even friendship will be too painful (as it proved to be with M).

My hopes and yearnings are just big. And so unlikely at age 71 to be realized. I do accept (in rational mind) that I may live alone for the rest of my life. But the rest of me is a love-focused puddle of ectosomething. Again, an older man with supportive loving family and comfortable resources realizes life is easy enough on his own.

I also worry, knowing myself, whether I'll fully take in reality as I so often swear is my friend, or hopefully go along being his friendly/happy pal when that isn't really what I want. Or since I liked him so MUCH, isn't really realistic with him without hurting myself. Too early to bail on a fair attempt...but the advice to be his happy friendly friend might turn into acting or manipulation. I can't do that either. Shoot.

Here's my worry. He SAID: "....whether because of the memories and impact of a 45-year very happy marriage or just the fact that I've become accustomed to living solo I am just not ready for any relationship beyond friendship, and I certainly hope we can share that...."

What I did with M. is when over time he made two very clear statements to me during best-friend year, I continued to nibble around in my mind with hopes that would change. No chance. Those were once in an email: "Don't imagine anything else." And once in person when I asked how he'd make space for me: "I don't want to change anything."

How do I tell the difference between M's direct statements that amounted to "NO" and the Scot's "I am just not ready." I suppose "not ready" COULD be interpreted as "might be ready later..." But I wonder if that's foolish. That's what I'm worrying about, anyway. My ability to fantasize and deny reality because of the Lovely Dream. I dunno if Scot is ruling it all out forever (comfortable living solo now) or for now.

I guess I need to continue dating (slim pickings now, and with winter isolation coming) and keep my head. My head, despite life experience, is about 14, I think.

If I coulda kept my head under control ....

Thank you thank you thank you for listening. You've no idea how much it helps.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on October 25, 2021, 02:16:18 PM
I don't know that it's possible not to feel our feelings, Hopsie?  I think people just are a certain way about certain things and I don't think you should give yourself a hard time for feeling excited/hopeful/seeing an end to being alone and so on.  I think you'd kind of be stuck when it comes to love if you didn't get butterflies in your tummy over someone and have that little ping of "ooh!  This could be good" early on?  I think that's the bit that is so intoxicating and exciting and the bit that gets you hooked on someone.

I think you played it the right way.  You did gather info, you didn't rush in to build it in to something it isn't, you've had a couple of nice dates and things are friendly, which is good.  Personally, I'd not like to see you spend another two years meeting the Scot, lovely though he sounds, for lunches and get togethers, because I don't think you can relegate him to the friend zone - I think you would be hoping he'd change his mind.  Which isn't to say I don't think you should never see him again, but I think I would try very hard to meet other people, difficult though I know it is with the Covid situation.  Just so it doesn't become another situation of pining and hoping things will change whilst having to put that emotional energy into being friends, when you know you want so much more.  It's not quite the same situation, but I pined for a friend for a long time because he wasn't ready for another relationship (his previous one ended badly).  And we did lunches and long talks and sat up half the night sharing all our secrets and eventually he was ready for another relationship - with someone else :)  And that crossed my mind when I was reading your post as well.

I did wonder if there is anything you can do to make the prospect of a permanent single life more palatable?  I just wondered if it's in any way possible to focus on that (which you can control?  I guess?  If there are certain things you can do that would make that feel better?).  Which is not to say forget the idea of meeting someone, far from it, but I just wondered if there was something else you could focus on if it might make it less of a disappointment if a couple of promising dates doesn't become any more than that?  I just know with me that I cope better if I can work on things I can control and the things I can't become a bit less prominent in my mind.  So with the current situation, for example, I can't control next door, but I've taken as many steps as possible about the things I can control to minimise the effects of what he does.  It's still crap, but it has reduced the emotional kick from all of it.  I don't know if it would make sense in your situation, or if the being single option just isn't something that can be improved on but I thought I'd mention it just in case.

I think you're doing a grand job and I hope you don't beat yourself up over feeling a bit down that it isn't looking to be anything more just now xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 25, 2021, 03:07:07 PM
Thanks, Tupp. SUCH wise counsel.

Not giving two years to just-friending, because I'm at risk of pouring too much of myself into it based on dreaming, rather than what is. And isn't. YES. I don't know what limit I'll bump into but if Scot remains so casual that it's clear, I'll act to protect my heart better. I hope.

Continuing to date. (Will do, as possible. Not many opportunities just now.)

Accepting a permanently single life and being happy anyway.
Tall order but I know it's pragmatic. I'm a fierce defender of women embracing independence and finding joy in solitude over staying in miserable relationships. I just don't know that I can ever uproot my core desire for love AND commitment until I'm so feeble it's ridiculous. Two unhappy short marriages and then on my own since 1995....M being the longest exception...rekindled the hope and determination. It was "almost there" with M for a time. So couldn't it be "there!" w/someone new?

I know sanguine, calm older women who've made complete peace with permanent singlehood. I know how likely it is that this is how I'll wind up anyway whether I want to or not. But for now, I can't see that as my goal because honestly, it's not.

I am fairly staggered that at this age, I'm still trying to grow up.

Thank you, Tupp. Your reality anchor, your persistence, are a model for me.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 25, 2021, 04:34:02 PM
Amber, thanks for this:

Quote
...this isn't a rejection, OK? It's an admission that he's feeling uncomfortable with his own feelings about what he wants. It's good he respects you enough to be honest about it.

I agree with all of this. He's not rejecting, he's being honest and considerate. (Imagine!). I have met so many men ready to use but not to give. 

I'm glad you developed LTRs with previous friends. I'm awed. It is absolutely the best outcome. I think you're better at guarding your inner self and/or pacing your outer impulses than I am but it's a discipline I can aspire to get a BIT better at. That's probably it, realistically.

Helping him ... as a just-friend
Restraining my own dreams ... as a just-friend
Helping him gain perspective ... as a just-friend

Tall order. But the right thing to do if I find I avoid becoming a slobbery naked oyster in the meantime. UGH. Who loves being this vulnerable? I do NOT!

hugs and thanks,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 25, 2021, 04:36:30 PM
Beatiful wisdom and great advice, Lighter -- thank you for this:

Quote
Just be a light in his world and keep being your happy self, ((Hops.)). That he's an honest Scot is a good thing, imo.

 People like being around folks who make them feel better/good.  Remember boundaries and keep seeking joy.

It's like these are highway signs. I need glasses for driving, must make an appointment.

I think YOU guys are my signposts, my focus, and are offering me recognition of when to take the lead foot off the accelerator.

Thanks so much,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 25, 2021, 06:01:54 PM
PS Tupp -- That must have hurt SO much. To be an emotional nurse to a man you carried love and hopes about, help him heal emotionally by being so open to his needs and sharing so much time ... and then find out he's all ready to go forth -- to someone else.

I'm sending him a flabby arse-kicking. I'm sorry that happened to you. No wonder you're a romance-realist. I'm taking notes.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on October 25, 2021, 11:37:07 PM
PS Tupp -- That must have hurt SO much. To be an emotional nurse to a man you carried love and hopes about, help him heal emotionally by being so open to his needs and sharing so much time ... and then find out he's all ready to go forth -- to someone else.

I'm sending him a flabby arse-kicking. I'm sorry that happened to you. No wonder you're a romance-realist. I'm taking notes.

hugs
Hops

He's still a good friend, Hopsie, I think I'll always love him - when Covid started it was immediately him I thought of and wanted to be with - "if we're all going to die in the next few weeks then I want to spend those weeks with you" kind of stuff.  He didn't do anything wrong.  I thought if I was good, kind, helpful, thoughtful and put his needs before my own - as I'd always been taught to, in every situation and with every person - then I'd be rewarded, and my reward would be him.  And that's not how it works.  He and I are good friends, he cares for me, a lot, but when it comes to romance, his interests lie elsewhere.  He never made any indication it was anything other than that, there were no false promises, it was my mind that had been so drilled to believe I must be good at all times and that would lead to good things.  In his mind, I was being a good friend to him (which I was), but he wasn't looking for any more than that in me.  We all love having good friends, right?  That's why, truthfully, I wouldn't aim to be a good friend to the Scot.  I think you'll be looking for signs and tiny nuggets that he's into more than that (like you did with M), distracted by him (so not focusing so much on meeting someone else) and getting your heart broken just a little bit each time that you wish it was more than friendship and he'll be oh so happy because he gets this lovely, intelligent, vibrant, engaging woman he can enjoy meals and days out with whilst he (wisely) guards his own heart.  " - Helping him - as just a friend - restraining my own dreams - as just a friend - helping him gain perspective - as just a friend" set my codependency bells off.  This is a huge undertaking for a guy you've been out with twice and who has done absolutely nothing for you, as a friend.  And no need for him to, because he hardly knows you, and you hardly know him.  I know you enjoyed both dates but truthfully, we can all turn in a good show for a couple of hours at a time.  There could be a complete and utter arsehole lurking beneath that benevolent Scottish exterior :)  And of course, there might not be, he could be exactly as he presents but I think you might do well to think about how best to help yourself, live your dreams and gain your own perspective, you know?  And whether 'being his friend' is going to help you do any of that?

Re being permanently single, I wouldn't mean it to sound like I think you should accept it and give up any hope of anything different, I just wondered if a change of focus in your mind might help - if there were any practical steps you could take to make the prospect less scary?  Like looking around again at living arrangements (help nearby sort of places), working on a health plan that can be adhered to over the winter months (group dog walking or something?  Outside, lots of fresh air, with similarly Covid conscious people?).  A new hobby, something practical and creative, maybe, where you could meet other people (again, Covid in mind).  Things like that.  I just wondered if there was a third option in between 'meeting Mr Right' and 'alone forever', both of which are very real possibilities, I'm not suggesting they aren't.  Nor am I suggesting a sort of false happiness about being alone when you don't want to be (you know how much I hate all this false positivity stuff :) ).  But whether there's a practical plan that just might keep your mind busy enough that pining for what might be with the Scot doesn't become your main focus over the winter.

Anyway, lecture over :)  I don't mean any of that in a critical, unkind way.  You're a wonderful person, Hopsie, warm hearted and caring, intelligent, emotionally aware, you've lived many lives and learned to cope with a lot of pain along the way.  You are sensitive and romantic, and prone to writing the story of how it's all going to go, and that's a good thing - the world would be a happier, safer place with more people like you in it.  But I also think it's sensible to be aware of all of that and not ask yourself to do things that you're probably not able to do without damaging yourself a bit or giving yourself a lot of extra work that quite likely will only benefit someone else.  He has told you, clearly, that he's not looking for anything other than friendship.  Which politely translates into "I'm not interested", because we aren't friends with people we've met twice.  We build friendships with people over a long period of time, and experiences together, and tough times when we see how they react and respond.  Anything before that is just passing time over a coffee, you know?

I am sending protective vibes from across the pond and I hope you will put you, and the reality of your own situation, first, and not put all your focus on what would be best for him just now xx

Editing to add  I do understand that ADD makes certain things difficult/impossible to do so suggestions might not be ADD friendly - but wondered if it would spark an idea that is ADD friendly if that makes sense? xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 26, 2021, 08:38:20 AM
Quote
- "Helping him - as just a friend - restraining my own dreams - as just a friend - helping him gain perspective - as just a friend" set my codependency bells off.  This is a huge undertaking for a guy you've been out with twice and who has done absolutely nothing for you, as a friend.  And no need for him to, because he hardly knows you, and you hardly know him.

My CoD bells went off at my quote too, Tupp. It was a partial summary of both my instinctive desire to make things okay for him (with unrealistic hopes that'd he'd also eventually do the same for me) plus what friends were recommending in general -- me being a certain way for him. Including poet. Not that the idea of helping him or restraining myself for that purpose would be categorically wrong -- it's really what love is -- but the importance of your last sentence. THAT's the "reality is my friend" piece. Reality still IS my friend, and I don't want to over-fantasize about how a friendship would go, any more than how a romantic relationship would go. One way or another, I've got to teach myself to fill my head with more reality and less butterflies and unicorns.

I feel better this morning. Less ashamed of having had sudden strong feelings for a stranger. I woke up thinking about (again) re-engaging in my own world and life and got my mind focused on that. Kind of "back in my body", kwim? Feel a little embarrassed at everything I spewed out here, so thank you very much for your kindness and perspective. I feel as though I got back to the pier.

The checking out new living arrangements still isn't on. I know all the "elder alternatives" in the area and cannot afford any other option at the moment than living in my home alone. I don't want to move out of my sweet house anyway if it's not absolutely necessary. I COULD explore, once supply chains reopen, the faint (very faint) possibility of adding a small extension with a BR and bath, which would open up the chance of a housemate (or even carer one day). BUT that would take half or likely most of my savings, which are the only bulwark between me and not having any daily help if/when I'm too frail to manage everything on my own.

I have PLENTY to do all winter even if most of the human stuff is on Zoom. I absolutely need more structure and an exercise plan. (I've got one, need to DO it.) I have things in my home to tend to that will boost my self-esteem like crazy once I do them. I have a freaking novel to write. I'm a lot more involved in church stuff again and overall, I like it. I get to act out my own values and interact with good people while doing so. Right now, they include:
--leading a women's Covenant Group, which eases isolation and stimulates the mind for everybody
--a new role as one of the leaders of a refugee project. I do all the communications. We're supporting a family of Afghan refugees arriving soon from a military base south of here. They're in quarantine because somebody got measles, but once that passes. A refugee organization will secure their apartment but we will be fundraising to cover rent, collecting furniture and household goods and clothes and a storage unit for donations, hunting down various things they'll need, etc. Some of our group will be directly contacting the the family (or couple or individual, we don't know yet)  on a regular basis. They will help them navigate health care, drivers' licenses, schooling, employment, etc. And offer them regular contacts and mentoring to reduce their shock and help them acclimate and hopefully thrive in time. I'll write it all up and keep the congregation updated, create new appeals or drives, etc.
--a new proposal I call Elder Net which I've written up and met with the minister about. Don't know how fast it'll get going but it's a gap that I've cared about since long before I became older myself. The church has a patchwork of old people looking out for older people. The church itself does a ritual elder dinner once a year. It's very nice, but doesn't cover the needs of people like those I worked for before the pandemic. I'm talking about creating a program specifically for isolated OLD-elders with no involved family nearby. Wrote up a long list of what I'd observed about how many (and these were all folks who COULD afford to be in a "senior community" of some kind--it's a well-off congregation) just give up on the congregation when they're old enough to: have trouble hearing, not drive, deal with pain, have trouble with technology, inadequate diet, a host of stuff. And my point to the minister/church is: We take special focused care of toddlers and babies and don't resent their vulnerability or need, but when folks get OLD-old, we let them quietly slip between the cracks of the community's attention and some not only live alone but deal with pain and isolation and debility on their own. OLD-olds are inconvenient and involve work and if we are (as a spiritual community) what we say we are, I say we are neglecting them. The minister didn't disagree and said she'd take it further and see what we could start up if I'd remain involved (I said absolutely). I want MULTIgenerational involvement. Teenage crews can rake leaves, cut grass, walk dogs. Other folks could "adopt" an old-elder to visit regularly and check in with, etc. Some of that does get done anyway for many of them; it's the few I worry about (especially since my friend who'd volunteered for years and worked his ass off for the church died alone in his apartment and wasn't missed for days).
--a big local social justice organization we're part of...I'm a "network member" which involves messaging and meetings and again updates to the congregation. I don't enjoy it as much as the other things but it's literally good work that makes a difference to local poor people so I'm continuing it year over year.

So there's all that. It's not as though my community life has to lack meaning. If I focused more on what other humans need and less on myself, life would be better. For me, it's pretty simple but I need more WILL. Keep at my health, care for my home (downsize and declutter), and WRITE MY BOOK.

Thank you again, Tupp. That was a bracing and very helpful post and I'm really touched you "entered in" to what I've been doing and what I could do instead.

Greatful hugs, and apologies to all for my meltdown!
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on October 26, 2021, 10:07:29 AM
Aw, Hops, I love the sound of all those projects!  Especially the Elder Net one.  I think sometimes things like that just need someone with the oomph to organise them.  There's often lots of people willing to help, and I think sometimes people don't even know that there's an elderly chap who only lives ten minutes away and never sees anyone - we tend to stay in our own bubbles, don't we.  I love the thought of you matching up people who can help with people who need it.  And you're so right about the babies and children thing.  Why do we just ignore and neglect our elders?  It's horrible.

I completely understand money being an issue and it's a real tough one if you have to decide between getting physical changes and adaptations done and paying someone to come in and do other things you can't do.  Also makes me mad that people have to make those choices and we aren't living in a way where you'd know that you'd be looked after one way or another.

Please don't feel embarrassed or feel you need to apologise (she says, having just posted that your feelings are your feelings and you shouldn't disregard them ;)  Lol, you know what I mean, though).  You know it's safe to say things on here that you might not elsewhere and it won't come back to bite you on the arse :) I get that same instinctive desire to make things okay for people and there are a lot of people who genuinely need and would appreciate that help.  But I just know with me I give away too much of myself and I think you're similar (and all of those projects you're involved in sound like a lot of helping people anyway).

I'm glad you're feeling a bit better/more clear headed today and I am continuing to send my 'send Mr Hops in Hopsie's direction' vibes in your general direction.  And yes, get that book written :)  Lol xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on October 26, 2021, 02:30:26 PM
Hops, I wonder if the negative image of "single old-age" is something conditioned into us. I think we assume that it's lonely, boring & pitiful... at least, I think this is part of our mental picture about it sometimes. You can make your life what you want it to be, you know? And you're definitely doing that, from your description.

As for your dream of finding Mr. Right... I don't think you need to give it up. Owning that dream and continuing to pursue it (both with the Scot and the possible others later) is still a worth while endeavor. If you try friendship and aren't able to manage the desire for more... just tell him. Own it and at that time, make a decision about how/how not you want to continue.

It will be OK Hops. At our age, we don't need the angst or drama or games of our earlier days... and can still have those dreams and even fantasies... and hope for their fulfillment. We can break ALL the rules about relationships we want to - and design them in a way that's suitable for both participants.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 26, 2021, 02:53:20 PM
Thanks, Amber. I appreciate the encouragement AND the caution.

The "lonely pitiful older age" stuff is based on too much witnessing of those feelings in others nearing the end of their life. It's really daunting but I agree I shouldn't succumb.

Truly, though I have a few good friends, I think the tunnel only narrows from here. Having zero family or children to care about me, etc., is a big part of it. Friends do for sure, but even they can't step in and transform my life.

I have to.
The issue is that I deal with lots of fear about whether I'm able.

I don't like how weak I feel way too often. Working on it with T, but boy is it slow.
(I left my will to thrive on the curb after my D left my life. I KNOW it's not right.)

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on October 27, 2021, 01:10:34 AM
(((Hops)))

Sometimes I think willingness to thrive could be as simple as refusal to ruminate in past or present, but I don't know.

You're amazing.  I say be your own engaged and busy self.....without fear  You'll draw people to you, ime. 

Lighter





Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 27, 2021, 10:15:34 AM
Thanks, (((((Lighter)))))).
I hope to be doing that, easing into winter-busy. In-person meetings haven't really soared back yet, and nothing much is happening on the dating site, so I think winter-mode is here early and I won't likely meet a lot of people for the next six months. But I do have things I could and should do that have meaning too.

The Scot thing just really surprised me, how intense my feelings of pain and disappointment were. Calmed down now but I still haven't quite understood it. Good topic for T today.

'Tis the season of Zoom, that's for sure. I have three today: therapy this afternoon, then back to back this evening: speaking about FB at the beginning of a church Board mtg, then a poetry reading I'm excited about. Tomorrow night is a refugee planning meeting.

What would be ideal would be for me to ignore shoulder or other discomforts and my usual reflex to get under the covers and stay there, and actually accomplish a little something in the house. Plus take a walk with Poorch. That would feel GOOD.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on October 27, 2021, 11:21:49 AM
Hops, you are probably feeling an old wound, that the Scot unintentionally poked at.

We all have different issues surrounding attachment, approval from others, need to be "seen"/"known".... etc from the past that will kick up at different times. And of course, different coping mechanisms. B and I are only now - after a few years - getting into some of those. No matter how much one feels they've moved on or healed - there are always sensitive spots.

I think it's a bit concerning how quickly your hopes & expectations about the mutual "like" in this relationship had the potential to be something a lot deeper. Even with the instant attraction between B & I, neither of us jumped to commitment and deep feelings that quick. Doesn't mean there weren't comments, butterflies & rainbows at that time, but neither of us took them that seriously initially. It took more time to learn to trust the other - constantly looking at & second-guessing whether there were "red flags" or just our own fearful imagination.... or personal issues.

And we both have personal history, other relationships (close & otherwise) in our lives... that needed some explanation, understanding, and acceptance. Loyalty is one thing, B & I have a lot in common on... and that's both good and bad when starting to build a new relationship.

You and the Scot have seen each other twice. That's like casually looking at house plans - before buying property, selecting a contractor, and beginning that long process of making a thousand decisions. Dreams are DEFINITELY IMPORTANT. But it is always wise to take one's time before giving permission to believe you're living out a dream. The resulting disappointment (and I guarantee there will be at least one - probably something one can live with; sometimes not) will be a giant kick in the heart, if you give too much too soon. That can even scare a person off.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 27, 2021, 11:44:53 AM
I think it's a bit concerning how quickly your hopes & expectations about the mutual "like" in this relationship had the potential to be something a lot deeper.

You are absolutely right, Amber. I think it's not just concerning but alarming. It is Topic #1 to talk about with T today.

It's a whole-life thing, I believe, for me. Me, my life, my loneliness, time advancing, traffic on the dating site dwindling now that I'm soon to be 72. IOW, rather than just being sensibly alert for compatibility, I revealed too soon how excited I was to connect with the Scot. I may indeed have "scared him off" and that possibility is both humiliating and painful. I think it says good things about him that he sensed my vulnerability and carefully dissauded me. And yet still I scraped for ambiguity ("ooo, 'not ready' might mean readiness is still his eventual goal? Doubt it.) If he's saying let's be casual I'll never feel any other way, might be better as Tupp hinted not to spend time with him. Or, I might learn something good from another encounter or two.

I hadn't been thinking of myself as that desperate, which I KNOW is an unattractive quality. I think in part my reaction may represent that although I ended things permanently with M a few months ago and am not looking back, perhaps there's still damage in me from all that (linked of course to old N-baggage -- feeling used and led on) I haven't yet healed from. The Scot was doing nothing of the sort.

I don't know. I know I felt huge pain at this particular letdown, which I normally don't feel if a man doesn't click with me or vice versa. I think dating now is feeling very different than it did a year or so back. I feel a time-and-culture window inexorably closing, so the alone-rest-of-my-life scenario feels much more likely than it did then.

However. I won't stop thinking. Once I fully understand it I should be better able to manage it.

Mercifully, I do have clarity on the distinction between the pain I felt at his message (which was about myself) and feeling "love." I am not "in love" with the Scot. I have a runaway imagination and my intuition was telling me "great fit!" while his was not. But it is easy to imagine more, too easy, and that's a big part of my problem.

I'm glad I'm a poet because it's the thing I'm best at, but at time it's agonizing to be so emotionally open. That's what helps create good poetry, but doesn't help for walking around.

Thanks for your wise caution Amber...I really need it.

Much gratitude,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 27, 2021, 11:58:16 AM
Hmmm. I wonder if I have "daddy issues"?

I actually wonder. More T stuff!

My father was SO decent, self-effacing and driven by ethics and core Xian values (never preached, just treated all people with respect and kindness), and I adored him. He was the One Safe Person in my childhood. He radiated the good stuff.

I wonder if meeting a man who has "serve others" all over his resume, in great contrast to M whose service to his students was mostly polish-his-own-ego-with-acolytes .... hit me in the lost-father place?

The Scot's resume shocked me in that way. He has spent his entire career making a positive difference in the world, centered literally on ethics. (He founded a center for ethics in international relations.)

I wonder if the part of me that misses that kind of man (Hi, Dad) also got triggered, so some of the pain I was feeling was grief at missing a boat from the same flotilla?

Dunno, dunno, but this is making sense to me. I have met SO many men who seem cynical, jaded, bored with life, uninterested in others, vapid, shallow, super materialistic, status-driven, etc etc.

I think maybe the Scot was a projection screen for me ALSO because he clearly has the kinds of values I don't often find. The hyper-Xian veteriarian just wanted to get laid, as did the furniture-empire owner, the conservative defense-contractor widower. Nothing wrong with THAT as part of connection, but so few of those also showed interest in the other layers of life.

Although I'm so weary I'm sure I'm no longer arm candy, the patio guy said to me yesterday, "You're a pretty woman" (sheesh!). So, nice, I guess. But I'd like to be seen beneath the skin, and part of my runaway fantasizing was that the Scot would value ME. Not just the dimple or humor or whatever.

Interesting. I do find it very easy to imagine him valuing me. Stupid but true.

Anyway thanks, Amber. You invited me to go deeper and as ever, once I understand something, it drains away much of its power to hurt me. Just wish I wasn't so slow at it.

But this has given me some strength and I'm looking forward to talking it over w/T.

hugs
Hops

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 27, 2021, 02:17:33 PM
Really good T. She said (you'll recognize MANY of your own wise perceptions):

It wasn't expectations, it was your hopes. They are what they are. Powerful longing.
How you felt was because good timing or not, it was a small and real heartbreak.
You DID work through it in two days. Not a year.
You have nothing to be ashamed of.
He was honest, you were honest.
It was great that you told him how you felt so far.
You can try a meeting or two as friends and if you then find you can't manage it, you just tell him so, and then withdraw.

About the Daddy thing. I'm really glad that suddenly came into my mind, and T got it. It's true. I want to be with someone KIND and HONEST. M was ultimately neither. I got so excited about the Scot because I have a feeling these are his values, too.

It's a good Daddy issue, if I'm right. Doesn't hurt after so many "users" to have some strong inner clarity about what kind of person I want to spend more time with. Doesn't have to be the Scot if that fizzles as it probably already has. But it's a super-clear indicator of what are the most important qualities to tune into. Not dazzling resumes or education or all that gravy, but CHARACTER.

I think the Scot may have that. This does not mean he's fully available to me. He said he's "not ready." The rest...what does "not ready" mean -- is it a softer FULL NO or just a measure of TIMING? (Does "not ready" mean his goal is "ready later.")

I asked T ... do you think I could simply ask him that? She said absolutely, and it would be very healthy to! Who knew?

So, aha. Instead of suppressing a question like that for fear of "appearing" over-eager or desperate or whatever, that's actually adult/rational brain. Asking for information that will help me decide in the real whether friendship will work for ME.

T just wants me to keep the focus on him being a friend to me as well as the other way around.

I feel a lot of relief and T doesn't think I should criticize myself for innate traits. It may cause me difficulty to be highly sensitive and emotional. But that's what I am. Built in.

I feel better. And SO much of that is due to you guys. Thank you. You don't even send me bills!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on October 28, 2021, 11:52:09 AM
Hops,

I think you moved through the Scot feelings beautifully.  It's difficult to look deeply into painful emotions.....to see what's behind it. 

Well done.

Esp suspending judgment of yourself. 

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 28, 2021, 04:56:48 PM
Thank you again, Amber and you too, Lighter.

I am feeling not just better but HAPPY, because I finally figured it out. I have reached the holy grail of really seeing what just happened over the last few days. Had lots of support and wisdom (especially here) and help, too. And I got there.

The recent emotional crisis uncovered several new/unaware layers and really taught me some important new things. One thing was how deep my missing kind "Dad" goes. I didn't realize it was still in there, so many years later.  I figured out that projecting all those humanistic qualities sooo strongly onto the Scot before I really know him was about how deeply I've missed having and trusting a man (similar to my Dad) who is KIND and HONEST and ETHICAL in relationships, not just in professed values. Honestly, kindness is the IT factor. Not just a word but absolutely the first and most important character quality I'm looking for. D'uh!!!

I suddenly saw in complete clarity how I have had decades of relationships in which after a while I figured out that no matter how well I held compassion for and really understood different men, my track record is having chosen a lot of them who were just unkind. !!??!!  (I have even wondered if in some unconscious way by trying to "fix" or "change through love" a bunch of men like that I was trying to fix my sociopathic, cruel bully brother (and get his love back). Yikes. And probably.

Apparently when I was very little I adored him. When he went off to kindergarten and I was still home, the story goes that I'd go into his room and get one of his shirts and wear it all day until he came back. (My how things change...I'd rather burn one today! But I think as a tiny girl, he might've been my world.)

Major relationships: First love cheated (with my best friend), Husband #1 yelled nonstop and had a punitive streak, husband #2 lied pathologically, married lover (my fault) strung me along, a narcissist local artist was just that, super-executive conservative dude just wanted to dominate, M's a charming narcissist with all that implies. I think after M I DO feel ready to recognize the RIGHT qualities in a man, and when I thought I saw a whole bushel of them in D, I totally lost my balance.

My T and poet both think this is overall a good sign and a "birth" of a new big awareness.

Kind of feels that way to me too. All I know is that I'm back within myself, no longer scared, and feeling alive and present. Whatever the Scot does or doesn't do.

Whew.

hugs
Hops

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on October 29, 2021, 01:44:53 PM
I have a great big smile reading your post, Hops.  It all made sense and I feel certain you'll have more clarity around all new relationships.

Clarity is a very good thing!
:: Nodding::.

Lighter🎃
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on October 30, 2021, 05:44:45 AM
Aw, well done, Hopsie, those lightbulb moments are amazingly helpful when they come.  It makes sense that you're experiencing the loss of you dad when this happens, not just the understandable disappointment when a chap you like isn't available.  I hope you're doing okay and it hasn't brought up a lot more loss - it can be hard to close the gate again once it's opened (I think we've all been there!).

And I don't know about you, but these days I find it increasingly rare to meet someone that I click with, who has traits and habits that I admire and who I genuinely want to spend more time with and get to know better, male or female.  Most of the time I just want to get away and avoid people :)  Lol, so I think it is hard when you meet one of those rare gems, the excitement comes and then if they aren't able to continue, for whatever reason, it is a bit of a blow.  But hopefully now that you feel a lot clearer about what it is you're looking for in a person it might be a bit easier to wade through potential applicants :)  I'm imagining some sort of eligible gentlemans' clearing house now.  Lol xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 30, 2021, 12:21:46 PM
Thanks, Tupp. It really was a lightbulb moment and I'm grateful for it. Maybe more like a lightning bolt moment. I'm very glad those layers peeled away and I suddenly saw the underneath story. I honestly hadn't seen it and it's been lifelong. I'm sorry I didn't see the pattern with clarity sooner, but it got through when it did and I feel lucky about it.

I'll take insight as one of the greatest gifts in life. Smooth tidy insight that fits in the dresser would be nice, but in my life/nature more often it kind of explodes.

I think that's good, though. Maybe it's some form of essence or personal lessons being concentrated or more intense during this chapter of life.

I've been very tired over the last few days. Must've been all that emotional exercise. But awake-tired. Thinking-tired. Etc. All very much worth it.

Thanks for the encouragement, dear Tupp. I don't expect anything particular to happen any time soon but I'm doing a dutiful check-in on the website and am connecting with new writing groups locally. ALL of that is good for me.

And since poetry is connected directly to my heart, if I am writing more and connecting finally with the local poet community, I will be finding connections in a way, regardless. Important ones for me.

big hugs to you,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on October 31, 2021, 08:40:24 AM
Aw, Hopsie, I'm glad it was a constructive lightbulb moment, sometimes those realisations can be like tsunamis of so much unexpressed stuff coming out but it's great when they give you clarity and things just make more sense.  Quite nice it's come now, I think, with the possibility of a difficult winter ahead, and it's so lovely that you're connecting with writing groups.  I think that way of being around people that you can have those connections with (even if it's online rather than face to face) is so nice.  I'm really pleased that it's all kind of made sense and lined up like this xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 31, 2021, 09:13:13 AM
Thanks, Tupp!
I just got invited by a local Serious Poet (teaches at the university also) to join a poetry workshop group. My goal is to present (for many, revise) all the poems I've written since my first collection in the late '70s.

It all happened because poet friend introduced me to those two poets I already meet with, and one of them forwarded an invite to give a live reading, and the best poet there offered to plug me into the loop with good quality poetry events/workshops etc. Happened in a week. He also sent me his own manuscript, which is lovely.

It does feel good. In other respects I'm not feeling very well, can't sleep and had some chest pangs and SOB during the night. I think if I conk out for a few more hours I'll feel better. (Two days ago I slept right through the most important meeting about the refugees. Woke up from a nap not knowing whether it was AM or PM. Was upset but got caught up with the group and back on track.)

Thanks for noticing and caring, Tupp. The downs get balanced out by the UPS, and all this poetry stuff is a huge UP.

BTW, I got a very sincere and sweet email from The Nun and I accepted her apology completely, as she did mine. We'll get together sometime in the next couple weeks. I'm glad it wasn't a friendship-ending conflict and that we each handled it well.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on November 02, 2021, 11:36:32 AM
I'm trying to stay rooted in the moment, Hops.  My first reaction to your finding the poets is.... I wish you found the poets and poet events a year ago, 2..... more, many years ago.

Then I remember...... you found them/they found you at the right time and this is happening now.

I missed a little of the joy around that.... wasted it on rumination. Even if it was just a little.  I noticed and noted it.

I'm happy for you and the other poets.  You'll all benefit through this connection.  Golly.... seems such a positive connection for all of you.  Like lightening in manuscripts and pens.

As for the Nun....I've just gone through a bit of the same dance with my friend..... the one who lost her husband recently was here for Halloween and there was no husband buffering or me tiptoeing around his demise in their shared space to buffer the rough spots.  Well....I'll write about it on another thread, but I'm happy the Nun reached out.  My friend and I are Ok too.

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 02, 2021, 12:09:08 PM
I hear you on the rumination, Lighter.

It truly is sad that I didn't have the insight-tsunami about my men-choices decades ago. I really regret it. I think I often got nearly drowned by deep and unconscious drives to "fix" childhood wounds; particularly the brother ones. Especially now, when I long for a life partner more than I ever have before and candidates are harder to come by, I'm regretful it didn't come sooner. But things happen when they do (I don't think there's "always a reason" but accept that they just happen). And I don't give up.

I think it's okay to accept that it's a sad revelation at the very same time that it's positive and a great relief to have been swomped on the head with it. Both things exist together; we're just currents of learning all the way through life. 'Tis what 'tis.

I'd rather die in the middle of a meaningful learning experience than decide I'm done.

"Sad" and "die" aren't negative words for me, just words. If I weren't balancing them inside with "happy" and "change" maybe they'd be "bad" -- but I'm feeling overall good about it. A little melancholy, but that's the season it is -- life, pandemic, physical changes. Gratitude, even in spurts, really helps me keep going.

Glad things are sorting out with your friend as well!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 09, 2021, 01:46:38 PM
I've been doing a big, reflective "review" of my last (hope that doesn't mean "last" as in "never another") relationship. Because M and I emailed so much and I expressed so much here and in emails to friends, I really have a clearer picture and it's helpful. Very helpful.

I saw something I was startled by, because I hadn't recognized this as part of my behavior to the extent it clearly was. Pleasing, placating, smoothing over, quickly forgiving-on-steroids to the point that I never demanded that a big boundary breach be genuinely owned by him. Probably, and probably unconsciously, I knew on SOME level that if I ever held him actually accountable and expected a mature response around that, it'd be over. I would apologize every time I realized my own comment or behavior had been hurtful or inappropriate. Immediately. Part of my code. But he just couldn't. I think his ego structure is very fragile. I have never felt badly about myself for saying "I was wrong." It's relief. Clears the path to go on. But way way back, the machismo or privilege or power or whatever in his family told him, Never Admit Fault. Never Apologize. I feel badly for the boy taught that. It harmed him.

I also saw in this review how real it was for some time. I really did love M. and buy the whole mythic fantasy he ginned up. (It's amazing that I met someone who's a worse fantasist than I am.) But only I am responsible for buying into it all for so long and letting it become trance behavior of a sort.

I'm the one responsible for allowing us to go on too long and take up more of my life than it should have once the writing was on the wall. It helps now to think of my T's perspective, that when I do see clearly what is real (see instead of glance at), I act. And it's taking me less time than it used to. That's the one step forward.

So that's put to bed. Not without any sadness but not disabling and definitely an important threshold relationship. I'm grateful for many parts of it. Now, I am either passing into a fulfilling future alone or perhaps even with a partner one day. But forward. Forward in time. Not back. Being in my present now is about health, growth and readiness. Really, more genuinely, caring for myself.

More on that in another thread. I hope all of you are doing okay. That Season is creeping up; I'll be holding all of you in my heart.

hugs
Hops

 
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on November 10, 2021, 12:53:35 PM
What important insights, Hops. 

I do believe you'll be available and responsive when new relationships present themselves.

Sorry for short post.... I'm in the weeds, deep.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 10, 2021, 02:38:07 PM
Thank you so much, ((((Lighter))))).

I think a lot of us are "in the weeds" right now.
Either overwhelmed by the present, processing the past, or just distracted and busy as this key season change kicks in during pandemic times. Takes effort and time!

When I feel any anxiety about fallow times on the Board, I remind myself I have resources and can still do productive thinking or reaching out.

It's all good. But I really did appreciate your message today.

big hugs,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 27, 2021, 06:54:09 PM
After relaxing a bit too much this evening, I thought of my T's suggestion that I could always contact the Scot and be a grownup: just say, are we on the same page about friendship? (Since he'd never responded since saying he'd be calling after "at least a week" in NYC for work.)

Hmmm. I wrote this:

I was thinking you're probably back from NYC by now; hope all went well. I was also thinking that saying you would call was a friendly impulse but perhaps not one that really suits you at this point.

Thought I'd honor your offer of friendship by checking in. I expected nothing but enjoyed the idea!


He responded instantly that he'd like to meet me for coffee next week (and NYC never happened, some long story). Hmmmm again.

So I said okay, and if it's cold out I'll invite him here bringing his own coffee, since I just have tea on hand.

Very odd. Don't feel worked up about it one way or another. It's pleasant to realize I haven't thought about him at all for weeks.

So I dunno what sort of meaning this has, if any. I imagine I'll just be calm and see what he talks about. No more drama.

But it's...interesting. Maybe this is the sort of stay-in-neutral-while-being-yourself-and-being-observant kind of thing Lighter and Amber always advise.

I'll give it a try. Nothing to lose.

Hmmmm?

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Phyll on November 28, 2021, 01:03:25 AM
Hopalong, I think it is much less scary approaching this as a friendship.  I recall you wrote that he quit drinking.  That may be a lot of pressure for him to learn how to date again after a long marriage and without the use of a social lubricant. You are being a friend by meeting him where he is at.  Coffee or tea and maybe some baked goods to snack on?  A card or board game maybe - or share some pics of your recent trip, or books you read?  Have a nice visit!
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 28, 2021, 09:25:24 AM
Thanks, Phyll. It might be okay, or might not. I'm mindful of something Lighter wrote reminding me vigorously that I can also change my mind at ANY point if I find it's not comfortable or positive for me. Given how vigilant I am becoming about checking in with myself, I think I'll know pretty quickly.

Hope it's pleasant for me but feeling fairly confident (hope not delusional) that I can shut it down pronto if it's not. I'm not even sure why I followed the impulse but I don't think it was too destructive. Those few days of huge revelations (for me) were incredibly valuable to my growth regardless of whether a friendship happens. And I don't want to treat a man like he's fentanyl, as that makes me powerless.

I'm actually glad he didn't contact me for such a stretch because that is more evidence that he really is not only not motivated to date/mate but perhaps not even to tend a budding friendship. If that didn't change after one more coffee time, I'll lost interest. Reciprocity is just as important in friendship as in a romantic relationship for me. His lack of followup has also cooled my overall interest to a manageable lukewarm. Just haven't been thinking about him. It is interesting though that when I did, he responded instantly. That would, on the surface at least, suggest he does want a friendship. But if he doesn't follow through or reciprocate fairly soon OR I don't feel at ease around him because I've underestimated my healing from my previous reaction, gate closes AND locks. I do think that upwelling of insight was huge for me, and that short-term pain is quite healed now. Something literally changed in me. So maybe this contact was just to test it.

Reciprocity, though. Slow starts for anything (building a friendship or whatever) are fine. Ongoing lack of any initiative or tending isn't fine, since that keeps the maintenance burden one sided. Ain't doing that no more. I feel like I know what to watch for, within myself, which is all I have control over.

We shall see if I'm blowing hot air and if you hear that whoosh, warn me!

Thanks for the support, Phyl.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on November 28, 2021, 04:47:19 PM
Be curious, Hops.  I really want you to lean into what's real.....without any self judgments.  Just....zero judging.

You're going to share coffee with this man.  Again.  That's the mission.

Oh, ya.....and to mine all the joy you can, no matter how it goes.  You're whole, complete and enough, just as you are.

Be yourself.  Notice reciprocity or lack of. 

I'm wondering if your refreshing honesty scared him a bit on the front end.  I'm pretty candid too and it's backfired a bit.  I'm getting better at holding my horses, slowing down and releasing need to be understood by others.

Understanding, myself, is turning out to be all I really need when I have fellowship in 3d and on this amazing forum.  There's more serenity, less anxiety.....more choice and feeling ok with what is.

Have fun.  The immediate respons is a good thing, imo.

Lighter


Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 30, 2021, 12:10:53 PM
Hmm. I'd invited him to bring his pooch to my yard and patio sit. He later emailed that Friday is going to be warm and can we meet downtown. I called back because I don't enjoy our emailing. I'm too rambling and he's too terse.

Anyway, turns out he'd wanted to meet downtown because he has another errand there and said we'd have about 45 minutes ("Is that enough, to catch up?"). I just don't feel motivated to get moving earlier than usual, dress properly, find parking and get to the Mall for a fairly rushed meet. Not a very relaxing prospect. Plus, I have a possible yard helper coming Friday so it'd be better for me to be home.

I declined and suggested he get in touch after his next trip. He's very busy and that's a good thing for him. But I am not holding my breath. If he finds his way to a more relaxed time frame it'd be enjoyable. This just felt too constricted for me.

His dog's daycare schedule is a high priority and he's ignored my suggestion to bring him over. So I dunno -- maybe he's making excuses or just doesn't have time (or enough interest to make the time).

Feel okay about it. I was privately getting irritated and there's no point to that. He owes me nothing but I don't enjoy the uncertainty. My problem, not his.

I will look into relaxing around it. I don't think the Scot will change my life (or vice versa) so it's best to let it go, pronto.

Should he call again then I'd feel reciprocal interest was present enough.

All good,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on November 30, 2021, 01:58:05 PM
Hopsie, I hope you don't mind me saying, but I think this is strike three.  He told you clearly he's not interested in a relationship.  He said he wanted to stay in touch as friends but then didn't call.  Now he's accepted (initially) your very thoughtful invitation for a drink free, dog friendly, covid avoiding social date and changed the arrangement to expecting you to haul arse to meet him in accordance with his schedule for a scant 45 minutes of his time.  I think getting irritated is a good thing; he sounds like he needs a bat up his kilt and your senses were telling you that.  He owes you the respect of doing what he said he was going to do, and he hasn't done that.  I think making it clear he can only spare you 45 minutes in between errands is bloody rude, quite frankly, and a truthful 'no thank you' would have been better.  I am hoping very much you meet someone who appreciates your thoughtful arrangements and is looking forward to spending a good chunk of time with you so that you can fill them in on your poetry, your refugee accommodation finding efforts, your elderly care group and so on.  You have an awful lot to give to the right person xx
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 30, 2021, 02:49:30 PM
I don't mind at all, Tupp. I am 90%+ in agreement.
Have been confused by his niceness and encouraging responses (email and phone) but you're right, behavior matters more than words.

I don't think he saw it as rude but perhaps it is. (In his life in NYCity and elsewhere everything's been rush-rush and important, but my life is intentionally a lot slower and simpler, which I think he's not interested in.) I gather he's so highly invested in working, writing articles etc that anything else takes second (or 10th) place. He's also mentioned other friends so I'm thinking he already has plenty.

I don't have to judge him for it but do want to accept what's real. I always do better with things spoken rather than not, so I may send a sort of summary  message explaining my sense that our senses of friendship-building vary so much that disappointment may lie in that direction. My idea of friendship building isn't rushed or superficial but he may be more comfortable with that. What I look for in friendship now is different as I think I'm in a life chapter where quality of friendships matters more than quantity. I enjoy relaxed long conversations with meaning rather than just occasional anecdote-swapping. He's likewise entitled to enjoy what he enjoys most. Staying in touch with a jammed list of folks he's known after decades of profound and satisfying world-changing work, and those people seem to mean a lot to him, which is a lovely thing. That ain't me--my career was meh.

It helped me when ending friendship illusions with M. to state it gracefully but unequivocally. It reinforced my decision. I think I may do that again.

It feels good to be honest with myself today, about old dead-horse-beating reflexes vs. speaking-up while letting-go. The speaking up part is about claiming my own needs and preferences as equal and following suit. Dunno if I'm exactly where I need to be but I do feel better when I'm not passive about this stuff.

And I don't feel anger. That implies attachment and there's no real basis for any. I've been hoovering out my head and the air is clearer in there. Some dust motes but at least I can see.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 30, 2021, 04:03:50 PM
Felt even clearer.
Wrote him that if he'd like a relaxed visit of a couple hours, I'm in. I also asked him to clarify what week I'd be hearing from him (he mentioned another NYC trip so fast I didn't grasp the when). Added that if I don't hear by then, I'll just release the idea (meaning friendship) with sincere best wishes for him either way. (Anybody who really wanted to be a friend, I think, would be willing. He may, like M, consider professional long-term colleagues his friends, though I define it differently for myself.)

I have a new friend -- female -- coming over tomorrow, who responded when I wrote after getting to know her a bit at the beach asking, do you have room in your quiver for another friend? --Absolutely, I'd love to!. As Tupp says, the Scot has responded if not clearly at least consistently, by not offering anything like that. Confused me but not any more. What I saw as thoughtful ideas, he might have seen as scary. The man said he's not ready and I believe him. Whew.

Could seem pathetic but actually it felt good. I'm going to treat people with the courtesy with which I expect want to be treated, while bearing in mind that people have wildly varying ideas of what is normal and acceptable in their different heads. Again, he owes me nothing. What matters is what behavior I owe myself.

I remember some phrase I read somewhere: Be impeccable with your word.

All that was missing was me calmly asserting my preferences (which he is free to take or leave), and I think my message did that pretty clearly. IOW: commit to a couple hours if you genuinely enjoy that prospect; likewise be clear about when you'll be in touch. (No false or vague hints pass GO.) If he won't/doesn't, off he goes from my head --for good-- in a cloud of bubbles.

I don't want to spend my precious remaining time in anything faked.

Lighter, you're right that I likely scared him with my blunt honesty. I'm just too far gone in the transparency process to throttle it back now. If I scare men away then I'm not destined to be with a man again. I'm always gentle and compassionate even while direct. But maybe that's too much for most. If it is, I'm okay with it now.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on December 01, 2021, 08:47:40 AM
Amazing, post, Hops!  Shifting into acceptance of what is and getting on with it.  Cuts out the angst and ruminating, ime.  SO much clarity and choice there.

I'm glad you made a new friend on the beach trip, ((Hops.))

Lighters
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on December 01, 2021, 11:22:26 AM
Thanks, (((((Lighter))))).

It does feel like big progress.

One mistake I make with men is when they say something, you know -- using words -- I tend to take what they've said very literally.

He'd said "I certainly would like to share friendship" and all I heard was "certainly." It's just a polite phrase, looking back. But it zipped right into the what I wanted to hear category.

I am relieved that it got unearthed pretty fast, for me. Delusions disengaged.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on December 01, 2021, 11:54:38 AM
And some more...finishing up the pondering.
I'm relieved that the obvious eventually can get through my skull.

It was weird to me (but likely just a polite impulse to him) for him to state so definitely that he would call me after a trip to NYC ("at least a week") and then just never did. After my call and his response, it occurred to me that in this direction hurt would surely lie. After all, he was in town. Even without a meet scheduled for after his busy period -- he could have made a 5-minute call. (And I have the sense that being frantically busy is protective for him -- a grief thing and understandable.)

In a literal sense, I'm not quite as impressed with his relational ethics as I was. But I also think my own fantasies set me up and lead to expectations that are not right or realistic. It feels like a relief but in an unhealthy, temporary way, to judge him. He's not a creep, but seems unaware of (if not indifferent to) his impact in a way I got too used to rationalizing away with M. Perhaps M was my "medievalist" vaccine? LOL. But I was in an actual relationship with M, never with the Scot.

On the other hand (stepping back from blaming) -- I looked back at my messages to the Scot. SO accomodating, SO absent of any needs or preferences expressed at all. Stuff like: I'd value becoming your friend regardless, you're such an interesting person...and even ended one "Your pace, your pleasure" (as though I had no desire for more assurance about proceeding) in an effort to not scare him. Disregarding my truths: vulnerability and need to check in for clarity all the way.

And then I give a call after six weeks of nothing, he offers a rushed coffee and I have the options: 1) Go all deluded and Glenn Closey and whale on that deceased horse, or 2) re-embrace the mantra I came up with years ago in desperation over my inability to let go of an unavailable lover during a very hard/lonely period: Reality is my friend.

It really is.

Loneliness is a reality I'm struggling with also right now, but I've taken some active steps about that too. Joining a Zoom group that meets weekly via church and got a sweet welcoming message from one man who said the group has become for him like family, and was welcomed by two other people too. Already have two friends in it, a married couple I like a lot.

I Zoom with my T today and it'll be good to sum it up for her. Anxiety and loneliness have destabilized me and sapped my optimism lately. But I know I can push back.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on December 02, 2021, 05:56:35 PM
My T is more perceptive than I credit her for.

Really good session. She said, "You need a witness." And that I was doing deep work (I often express self-consciousness about talking so much and rambling, ADD style). She said my narratives aren't wordsmoke but represent a deep effort to understand what happens.

That was reassuring. Slowly, working with this T has evolved into a safe space. She never shames or judges and has been extremely patient adapting to my anxious style (depending on what's happening). I told her about my circadian plus anxiety patterns, and she said she hadn't fully understood that before. Daylight good, twilight the anxiety climbs. And its connection to how long I've gone without being in human contact. (How quickly it's stanched when I do have some.)

Something Lighter said and another thing I read today talked about containing some of the anxiety by exiting my own head, which is the same as not ruminating.

I think that's what thinking about other people or doing other things does. I absolutely must schedule more of that. To spend the winter feeding my anxiety by staying in my own head would be....STOOPID.

hugs
Hops

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on December 03, 2021, 10:20:12 AM
Hi, Hops:

I'm so glad you're feeling supported and safe with your T.  Esp with cold months coming up🥶

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Phyll on December 05, 2021, 10:15:23 AM
Dear Hops,
WOW.  So very clear.  I am amazed at how you looked at your needs and desires without judging the Scot.  Great work! 

Once upon a time (before on-line dating was big) I signed up for this expensive dating service.  It was very disappointing.  I called it "dating school" because I realized I only knew how to be taken hostage (still struggle with that).  I decided I had enough people in my life who really love me, that I did not have time for people who didn't.  Unfortunately, I think that set me up for the relationship with the narc I find myself in.  I expected too much and believed the unreality.

I find reading your posts and following your thought process towards this dating process very helpful in clearing my view. Thank you for sharing it here.

I am sorry you are experiencing loneliness.  I think there is a lot of that going around right now with this pandemic.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on December 05, 2021, 12:05:13 PM
Thanks, Phyll. That was an amazing image: only knowing how to be taken hostage. I love the power of it but am very sorry it's so long felt that way for you. Damn.

I'm doing much better. One key thing has been to arrange for some kind of contact with a human every day. Could be Zoom, or a call, or a visit. I really need to do that and when I do, it halts my slide.

The Scot responded "alarm bells are ringing" (to my message about I would like this and that). I felt instant guilt (oh how controlling I was) and then thought: well, maybe any assertive woman stating preferences would be "alarming." It was interesting that he used lots of ambivalent language, still. Words he closed with included "maybe" "in due time" and "for now" and stuff like that.

I knew the last thing I needed was no closure. He might be fine with endless ambivalence but I'm not -- not without harming my own peace. I replied a last time with emotional truth (which I knew would scare him allllll the way away, and am fine with). I said I'd felt hurt that he didn't call as he said he would simply because I'd believed him. And was slow to realize he didn't mean it. I invest time in friendship, but if he only wants quick and casual, there's nothing wrong with that. It's just not what I'm looking for. And that I've learned not to daydream about "maybes." In the end, we were "two stubborn lonesome old farts who can't compromise on how to get together" and, imo, both lost. Then wished him well, genuinely. And that's that.

It is too bad, but I'm relieved. I appreciate and have compassion for his fears and defenses, but I'm never again going to pursue anybody who's not reciprocating interest, and not with vague language I could hook myself with if not super careful. I know my weaknesses and I'm too old. My own comfort may get mellower and I may be less edgy about these things in time...but I'm not there yet. Might as well just be honest and damn the torpedoes. Beam me up, Scottie, I'm outta there.

For an interesting diversion, my first love is coming by later. He lives far away but comes to the area every December to go hunting near his family's old place. We've had dinner at this time of year several times -- last time he called I was with M and felt uncomfortable about it so declined. But now I'm not and I'll be happy to see him. Friends ONLY (he's married) but we do have tender feelings for each other and nostalgia we share. He's handsome as ever and it does my heart good to see him.

We have little in common and wouldn't make an appropriate pairing now even if he were single, but I loved him once with all my heart and vice versa and it's a nice reminder. (After the last visit he had "run away with me" fantasies but I thought: hmmmm, move to Wyoming and help you open a gun business? Cough. LOL.)

Every single human relationship is a chance to learn and to find some light even when you must turn away from someone, I think. I'm feeling better. Life will present more people, or pooches or heck, birds to love.

hugs,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on December 06, 2021, 01:21:35 PM
Amazing post, Hops. 

Like a clear blue stream of water carried away all mental flotsam..... unadorned truth revealed.

Whatever the Scot's struggle, it's his and he  lost out, imo. Truly.

I hope you and pooch are enjoying beautiful weather on the porch.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on December 06, 2021, 06:29:35 PM
Thank you, ((((((Lighter))))).
You are so affirming; I truly appreciate it.

Pooch and I had a lovely afternoon while housecleaner and leaf mulcher were here. Went to the bank and brought them both back surprise (generous) early-Xmas envelopes. Went on a visit mission to old friend J who's been sidelined since a replaced hip. Took her early dinner and as she's a major Pooch fan, she really enjoyed our visit. And we did too.

Coming home the sky was streaked with sunset light and the temp was still mild so we enjoyed a snail's-pace walk that did us both good. Sunsets are gorgeous here...and there are gaps in certain places where you can see the western range.

On the eastern side is a foothill euphemistically called a "mountain" but even though it's developed, it's all twinkly. I love the contrast of the Serious Mtsn in the distance on one side, and walk another block and look the other way to the foothill twinkling.

Feel so lucky to be here, to live here, to be getting better.

First-love's visit was nostalgic and meaningful but also a nice way to review my life (met him as a teenager). He did the same. We both have regrets but also feel philosophical about the different paths we took. I was so stirred up with memories that I was awake all night but slept in and then did other things today. All good.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on December 14, 2021, 11:52:58 AM
I'm still in love...with both of them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVz-ZDiAgTs (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVz-ZDiAgTs)
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on December 26, 2021, 06:12:28 PM
I think something good (and bad) happened, but for me personally, balance: good.

Met an attractive, kind man (online) in a church discussion group. Remember feeling a bit curious as to why he's in THIS discussion group when he lives in another town (and is also a member at another church in an in-between town). Hmmm. But anyway, we've had a little friendly correspondence (the group asked to read some of my stuff, poems and a lay "sermon") and he's been interested. And frankly, I was getting quite interested in him. Loooooonely me. We'd agreed we'd meet next month for lunch when he comes over for a V.A. appt.

Long story short, I Googled and was shocked to find him on the sex offender registry (a child porn conviction 15 years ago). Yet he's still a human being, he's part of an intimate group of older folks and clearly it's important to him, and we are fellow members of the same denomination, if not church (thank heaven). I froze and then wrote him directly: I google everyone I find interesting and ran into your old conviction. I'm sorry. It doesn't make me judge or hate you but does mean I won't be able to meet you outside meetings or keep up a private correspondence. I wish you peace in the New Year and be kind to yourself. I did mean that; don't believe in eternal punishment and do believe he is kind. Just fucked up, evidently. This culture (and maybe his background) warp some people.

It was difficult but the right thing to do to protect my inner peace. So that's the part that is good. The not-as-good is that I felt so sorry for him that I nearly didn't.

I'm just grateful that that type of history, no matter how far back, is a bright line I will not ask myself to form a relationship across. I am grateful I didn't meet him in person or put myself in a position of vulnerability. Not physical, I don't have any reasonable fear of that, but psychological. I was already beginning to fantasize.
Y'all know how much difficulty I can have putting THAT horse back in the barn.

But I stopped cold. Too much darkness in my family past around sexual abuse of my aunt (and perhaps mother) by grandfather. I just will not court that kind of pondering, which would be unavoidable for me if I got closer to this person.

Holy smokes, y'all. When does it get easy? But I did good, right?

I need to be much much slower to emotionally connect before I know a person is safe for me. Project 2022.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on December 27, 2021, 11:04:34 AM
I'm sorry you're experiencing loneliness Hops. It's not something I have a lot of "catalog" of experiencing, except for somewhere between Mike & B, when Hol was on her campaign to get me to be something else, to meet her standard of approval. She's over that now; but is still free with her observations. We're still cooperating on working on HER issues a bit more now.  ;)  As she has some insight or other.

I can see where maybe - possibly; only you can say - the loneliness might be connected to how quickly you emotionally connect and start fantasizing the most ideally romantic relationship even when you're involved with guys - that you've only known a very short time. Been pondering and just looking at what you've written for awhile. One thing I've noticed about myself - the few times I've really jumped off that cliff - is that I wrote my own description of my guy in my head, without basing it on actual facts or observations or his interactions with other people. Most of the time, I have already collected that research on the person - either through knowing them, working with them or some other non-romantic experience first. But one thing I learned to do (painfully), was to not have any expectations of a "happily ever after" every single time I made those connections.

So, that's the "catching feelings" stage. It happens when/where ever it wants to, IMO. But that's still not a relationship. It can happen to one person at a time - at different times. In different ways. And sometimes, rarely, it happens together. Sometimes, we can even fool ourselves about those feelings. Especially if we have an old emotional wound or immediate concrete world need that we can't fill by ourselves. This could link back up with the "lonely", but that's for you to explore/decide.

(Sounds like non-sequitor, but isn't:) So, you know I've been watching tarot readings for awhile now. Seems they're all talking about love relationships for people 30-40 years younger than us. I've got the readers sorted for myself and really only watch a couple these days with any attention. They both have a background in psychology and therapy. But ya know, there's a whole lot of things that we didn't learn about relationships and life because of the dysfunction in our FOOs. So almost without exception these readers are very supportive of people meeting their own emotional needs and not expecting those needs to be fulfilled in any relationship. The exchange of meeting needs is the "golden rule" in relationship these days and that translates a lot better for people in later stages of life. It needs to be based on each individual being able to take care of themselves this way first - and I think that's a healthier idea than just seeking the person who APPEARS to be able to fill that hole in our hearts. It involves all kinds of other relationships with other people too. We're going to want to maintain those relationships even if we DO meet Prince Charming right?

And from that solid self-sufficient base, then the fairy-godmother universe supposedly puts Prince Charming directly in your path. That is also the "formula" in a lot of romance novels too. With all the variations thereof. You can probably already detect my skepticism of this idea...   :rolleyes:  The functional, useful part of that formula, IMO, is when a person is whole and has filled most of those subconscious "needs" themselves (and there ain't any right way to do that that I know of) one's life changes. In subtle, sometimes "magical", ways. I don't know why; but it FEELS to me like one walks lighter on the earth to a tune most people can't hear. (That's my imagination working overtime, about something I don't think I can describe.) But MAYBE it would help with the loneliness and anxiety, too.

Me, I'm needing intellectual stimulation. Thinking about maybe getting certified as an herbalist, even though I think I want to focus on the growing side of things. I also have to study some electrical physics to tune my HAM antenna (next step in getting shack on the air). It's gonna be a long winter, methinks. But as warm as it is (no hard freeze yet) I'm going to start planning the spring planting marathon and then the Hut and I can fight over the heavy equipment scheduling. LOLOLOL. Maybe I'll start a thread with seed/plant company website links -- the pictures are always so helpful this time of year.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on December 27, 2021, 12:42:06 PM
ABSOLUTELY right, Amber:
the loneliness might be connected to how quickly you emotionally connect and start fantasizing the most ideally romantic relationship even when you're involved with guys - that you've only known a very short time. Speedy fantasy/bonding isn't romantic, it's dysfunctional. (M taught me a lot, inadvertently.)

Part of it's loneliness (since childhood when it was deepest) and part romantic brainwashing from culture that I absorbed way too deeply. Novels were my whole life for many years as "real life" was too painful. My brain works better now and I am finally able to over-ride my own trance states (such as imagining a future with M, "seeing" kindness when it really wasn't there). It is effortful and significant when I do wake up, even better when I shake myself out of a waking dream in the first place. I think that's why I was "celebrating" having felt faint doubts and following them to a sad revelation about new Mr. Kindness. I saw I'd already begun fantasizing as a loud warning about where the gaps in my heart-coverage sag open if I'm not more mindful. This time, I think I was more mindful, and have saved myself future pain.

I couldn't agree more that it's important to meet one's own emotional needs as much as possible. I'm someone, however, who does NEED intimacy. But I find bits of it here and there in good friendships, in community, in volunteering, and in therapy. It's a patchwork of connection and may be all it ever is. I don't think I'll ever be alone on an Arctic voyage. It's my nature to suffer in too much isolation, and my vulnerability, and this year has been that for me. For a lot of folks, really.

Poet and I just swapped stories, and she'd once met (and dated) a similar man in the church community. Very kind, funny, etc. Once jailed for seducing his music student who was 14. She realized he wasn't for her, but later than I happened to this time. Oddly, maybe it's a poet problem. We're attracted to the unreality of romance and its myths because we are attracted to intensity on every level of life. Otherwise, I'd not have much of substance to write about. To write poetry, I drill as deep as I can, mining emotion and life for the subtlest surprises, which to me are as valuable as gold. Imagination is everything. But a poet can imagine too much in real life, where one needs insight to balance imagination. That radar that helps me see unexpected connections, even powerful ones, between ideas and sounds and images in the world that I can transform into poetry...can bleed over into imagining people-connections where they'd be unreal in daylight. Unreal or even destructive.

Poet friend's work is a lot more ethereal, abstract and delicate than mine. Mine is driving, punchy, and emotionally potent. There's a big thing for me in rhythm and sound, over idea. Mine kind of mounts to a climactic metaphor or revelation; hers floats and twirls in soft air currents and is highly spiritual. Each style suits who we each are, and it's fascinating to be supporting each other's art and life-learning.

She shared this morning that she's still haunted by her childhood abuse in Africa, and said her memories are full of gaps before age 18. She just knows she was terrified, and another memory had surfaced of being chased. I think the whole pack of village children would chase her. Her parents were so involved in their field work that they just abandoned her to the company of all the village children. She was very young and not ready for it and it all went worse wrong when an adult abused her in a latrine or outhouse. That horrible thing at age 4 has hung over her whole life. No wonder she spend several years with a husband who beat her.

Even at this later age, it's a joy to be healing alongside a friend who's also diving so deep. Like most on this board are. I'm really grateful for these friendships. SO grateful.

Thanks for your thinking, Amber. I value it so much because your self-sufficiency, though out of my reach to that degree, inspires me nonetheless. I'm learning not to shame myself for the baby steps, which in comparison look like crawling while you're on a tractor reshaping a mountain. Well, that's pretty accurate. But I'm infusing some of my little steps with more mountain spirit because of you.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on December 27, 2021, 04:44:57 PM
Well, I can see why the guy was posting outside his neighborhood, where he's not  required to register.  He wants to shake it off and who knows what for?  Best to SOOOPH.... stay out of other people's heads.  If he's the kindest, most changed human being with a renewed connection to God, you cannot know.

I think the message you sent was fine.  He might be terrified you'll out him to the rest of the group.  I too have that pity button, but will always override it with care for children and grandchildren of folks less diligent than yourself.

Again, can't know what his motives are, but as my sister used to say.....

"What gets you off, gets you off.... Yogi must eat."

He's broken and won't ever be OK.  You're right to protect yourself. 

Sorry that happened to you, but am glad you have the group.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on December 27, 2021, 05:15:06 PM
I guess you and I live in the opposite sides of that spectrum Hops.  I'm still doing a lot of work on realizing my emotions - the simple joyful ones especially - and I have a suspicion that I was pushed/trained to being so Spock-like and pragmatic as an antidote to my own fanciful imagination. But intensity exists all across that spectrum - I've felt it.

For me, "balance" is not letting either extreme hog the spotlight. Coz I'm a total basket case if I get intensely emotional or some kind of logical "monster" if I cease feeling and therefore revisit a thousand intense places I'd much rather disappear in the black hole of an aging brain's memory lapses.

I can keep the lessons of those experiences; I can name them and catalog them. I don't need to keep the visceral stuff anymore - not even for creativity.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on December 27, 2021, 05:56:21 PM
Thanks, both of you, for your as-ever penetrating insights.

Lighter, you're right, except that he's on the state registry (though he may also be visible on the usual neighborhood ones). I'm not worried and for once feel no ambivalence about having set a clear boundary. I don't feel upset about it in fact (except for what he participated in, which is unspeakable). Otherwise, only on my own behalf, I feel glad, because my reaction was preemptive enough and swift enough that I can truthfully say that I smelled the coffee before it cooled.

Even Hops can make progress! (I do imagine he fears being "outed" but I don't feel any urge to do that. In a group of smart older people, he can decide what he will do.)

Amber, you understand yourself so remarkably well. I almost envy your ability to leave visceral stuff behind. I couldn't be my particular kind of writer if I did, but I CAN continue to work at not letting that pipeline-to-the-heart waylay me in my non-writing or relationship life. I'm proud of this latest step; it tells me I have learned a lot in recent years and I'm beginning to apply it with less hesitation. As with the Scot, though that was jerkier.

Boundaries. Self care. Awareness. Such basic stuff but so good to discover.

Whew, and whew. A complicated story of progress, but I think that's what it is. Two steps forward + one step back and I'm finally doing the math.

hugs,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on December 27, 2021, 10:40:29 PM
Boundaries will keep us safe, Hops.

You're surfing real good, IMO. 

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on December 28, 2021, 09:18:44 AM
Yup. Got a reply, which was interesting [analyses in brackets]. BTW, there is not and never will be future correspondence. I just like analysing the communication.

I understand.
At least you were interested in me enough to look me up online. [Me me me. Hmm, why would a woman feel she NEEDS to look up a man online?]
I have long dealt with my shame. [Errrr, bravo?]
People who know me and my offense know I am a good person
who made a terrrible error in judgement and is paying a huge price. [Mebbe so. You are now kind and doing good deeds. Pay on, it wasn't "huge" at all, imo.]

What was missing? ANY mention of the unspeakable price paid by child victims of the activity he engaged in. None. The children must've been incidental. If they're alive, not crazy, not addicts, not on the streets or in jail because of the damage.

Anyway, he's still "good." To me, he sounds unattuned to moral nuance and he led with self-pity. Total, complete and final turnoff.

Valuable learning experience for me. In that situation, I felt proud of myself. I did hold back. I stopped fantasizing EARLY. I checked out reality. I acted on it immediately.

I love clarity. I know that analysing language for everything I can squeeze out of it is a survival skill for me. If I am alert and well-boundaried, I'm going to hear what's real. And now I know I can react. I HAVE learned.

This is different.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on December 28, 2021, 04:10:51 PM
This is different, Hops and you're growing through the lessons.

It's a good thing.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Phyll on December 30, 2021, 01:30:19 AM
Well done Hops.  I can very much relate to the early tendency to romanticize and daydream.  It reminds me of what a friend of mine once said which really stuck with me:  A co-dependent packs her bags on the first date. Nothing wrong with checking public records on a complete stranger you find yourself interested in before moving forward.  Great job in being direct with him and setting the boundary.  I am so impressed with how you honestly and fearlessly examine (and articulate) your own thoughts, motives, desires and feelings.  I agree - his response is a real turnoff - yes - leading with self-pity and no remorse or thought about the victim(s)...
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on March 27, 2022, 10:57:30 PM
Well whaddayouknow.

I just had a second date with a sweet man. S.

It was a nice experience.
He's divorced, my age, my economic peer, has a young child (11) because he married someone 20 years younger. Lives so close to the ex his D can walk over. Pooch liked him.

I see differences, loads. But he's a good person: kind reflexes, listens. Attractive and crazy into fitness, so that's a challenge for my insecurities. We had a nice relaxed time. Dinner at his place. I since we first met (two-hour lunch) have said EXACTLY what I'm thinking as I feel like it. He likes me. I like him too. We're very different. But there are qualities there I like: solid kind of country childhood. Adored his mother (good sign!). Maybe some neediness on his part that surprisingly might be a match for my own.

Who knows. Doesn't matter. Not fantasizing too much yet. (Yay, me.) I'm pleased I forced myself out the door to give it a try. Got lost and was a half-hour late. He said "I fall in love fast" and I made clear that my foot is on the brake, hard. We're going to see if we'd like to be friends (first if not forever) and have a plan to go to a favorite overlook soon.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on March 28, 2022, 03:56:15 PM
I forgot the part that's the most fun to tell:

1) Given the ADD, I have a terrible time getting out the door in time. Transitions fry the brain and my time management sucks. I know this, but it is like hand-digging a building foundation to change it. Fortunately, it sometimes gives good stories.

2) Called him re. running late; he's totally sweet and forgiving about it. Meanwhile, he's also invited Pooch so I let her pee and rush her into the car and hop on the interstate. She hates interstates so often trembles and complains at high speeds. I get absorbed in NPR. Halfway there, I realize she's just taken a dump on the passenger seat, so the car fills with poo aroma! (Me too, presumably). I had a little quilt on the seat to diminish dog hair for human passengers and while reassuring her (not her fault, I neglected to walk her long enough since I was late) that she's a GOOD GIRL. I swipe the quilt and some of the turds onto the floor at 65 mph. Not all make it. She next leaps into my lap and so leaves schmears on the center console and my pants. First impressions, right?

3) My cell phone is dead because of a SIM card problem I didn't attend to as I vaguely ADD-thought I would during the day. So I can't GPS. He lives in a dense development near the mountains that's 10x more massive than I realized and lacking in street signs (from Google maps, I'd figured oh that's easy, go around the roundabout and take a turn or two and I'll run into it). So I'm late and then get ridiculously lost.

4) I find the only center-square restaurant open on Sundays and 4 strangers get on their cell phones to help me find where it is, but I've been one syllable off on the street name. I tell them his name and a nice couple (with two cute kids) get on it. Later while I'm wandering through a parking lot in the wrong direction they pull up and go Nooo, follow us, you're nearly RIGHT THERE! Sure enough, they found it. Is that lovely kindness or what????

5) When I get out of the car the wine I brought him slips out of the bag and I scramble to find it while yakking a mile a minute to divert him from the poo-cloud.

After all that, we had a really nice evening. Now it's time to go out and Face the Pooch Poo. Couldn't bear doing it in the dark last night so left it to ripen.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Phyll on March 29, 2022, 12:20:15 AM
That is a great story Hops!  One I certainly can relate to with my ADD!  Those people helping you, that is wonderful. He sounds like a nice man. Have fun and enjoy!
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on March 29, 2022, 04:22:31 PM
Thanks, (((Phyll))).

I hope to just have fun too.
But he's got to slow it down or I'll exit.

Whew. He's still nice but I doubt we'll
become more than friends. Meanwhile,
nice to have a new one.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on March 30, 2022, 04:39:20 PM
This man still teaches me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efHo3nyBZns (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efHo3nyBZns)

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on April 08, 2022, 06:57:10 PM
Feeling really good about something.
The nice man I met online with whom I've had two very pleasant dates...I just ended it very kindly while expressing sincere gratitude (over email).

The elementary thing was, we really don't have much in common. So despite his niceness, which is real, I managed to think ahead and just see, clear as day, how frustrating it would be to try to forge something (just out of mutual loneliness).

He responded SO nicely that it confirmed my sense of him, and also said he actually agrees with me. He even added "political differences" as a likely bridge too far. (I didn't remember discussing that but he probably noted my license plate. LOL!) And he left me with compliments ("beautiful" and "highly intelligent") which will keep my old ego purring for weeks. I said genuine and kind things about him too.

What felt good was trusting my intuition (wasn't looking forward to our next outing) and also realizing -- this is the right thing, for us both! Respecting both our time and energy enough to spare us a futile effort to fit.

This ole dog figgered out how to do a new trick. So then I went and wrote friendly messages to three new geezers. All in all, a good experience! Very good. Glad I met him, glad I felt good about saying farewell. And neither of us hurt or diminished.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on April 09, 2022, 08:40:41 AM
Really good trick to learn, Hops.  I'm so glad to hear you're trusting and honoring your intuition. 
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on April 14, 2022, 12:33:51 PM
I was way too smug and self-congratulatory in my post about it. Gross. It was just a big relief.  I'd like to feel proud of myself without wallowing in self-praise, though.

Meanwhile, had a friendly chat with a nice guy who lives 4 hours away. I'm allergic to cats and he wouldn't "abandon" his for a relationship (I'd never dream of asking anyone to!). I told him if my cat allergy didn't defeat us the distance would and he agreed, but said it's "a shame." Kind of nice to enjoy a little chat without a goal, so I invited him to get in touch for a coffee if he comes through this way. That was it but it felt nice. Low key.

Very little traffic on the website now that I'm nearly 72 (older men are happy with and feel privileged to pursue younger women, I just would like to meet someone within a 5-year range either way). But meanwhile, there's nothing to stop me joining the very fancy new Senior Center and taking a few classes there and meeting some folks. I should and pretty soon, I will. Just been lazy about it.

Love's not much on my mind, as much as loneliness. Spring and summer aren't bad though. Fall/Winter are when I go into alone-forever-grief-fear mode. Not now.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on April 15, 2022, 08:44:03 AM
Hmmmph.

Hops, you're setting the bar awfully high for yourself aren't you? I mean, how can you pat yourself on the back for a "job well done", if you DON'T congratulate yourself and maybe feel a bit proud or smug that you've achieved a new level of dealing with things? That's all part of the experience, isn't it? Enjoy the glow for a bit!!

But, if you're still bragging about this moment - as the "high point" of your relationship management style - in 6 years (or 6 months) THEN you may whack yourself with the 2x4 of self-criticism.

BTW, even in this situation the rule of thumb that it takes two to tango, still applies. It mighta gone very differently with another sort of "gennulman".
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on April 15, 2022, 08:47:23 AM
Ya....not smug....just mindfully celebrating new skills making life better.

It's something to feel good about😉

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on April 15, 2022, 11:32:58 AM
Awww, y'aaaaaaaaall.

Thank you. A lot.

I'll burn that 2x4 in my firepit because....Never Ever Again!

Much thanks and grateful hugs,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on April 16, 2022, 09:11:19 AM
How' ya doing today, Hops?  Any plans?
Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on April 21, 2022, 04:42:45 PM
I do have a plan, Lighter, and it fits a Relationship/s thread for sure.

Tomorrow there's a rescue dogs transport. I'd signed up to foster and have been thinking about it...so I jumped, and am picking up a female 5 y/o (barely "senior" but she qualifies) pooch at the local SPCA. She's just six pounds, which is perfect for my bad back and my assessment of what sort of dog is good for aging with.

Fingers crossed Pooch won't want to kill her (dunno) but if we can make it through the transition and they bond and it's workable, I'd love to keep her as my (sounds terrible) "overlap" dog. Pooch is 12 and slowing down, and hopefully she might love to have a companion to cuddle with in her own old age. When That Day comes for Pooch, I'd already be well settled with a little Newpooch.

All fantasy because there can be lots of issues. Her pic is adorable but she looks skinny and scared. From a kill shelter somewhere in the south (probably TX). We'll see how it goes, and I'm helping her transition to a forever home whether or not I'm the long-term one (or Pooch is). And it gets me recorded as an active foster, so if not this little one, perhaps a future one.

Will keep you posted! Thanks for checking and sorry to be so late to reply!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on April 21, 2022, 07:22:59 PM
That update gave me goosebumps, Hops.  So nice of you to foster....and also pragmatic.

You go get that scared doggy and help her fEel safe.  I hope it goes well😊
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on April 22, 2022, 07:41:03 PM
So. Absolutely tiny 6-lb little newdog discovers Pooch's very comfy chenille on the foot of my bed and decides that's a good spot. Rather than going Cujo, justifiably, Pooch just gives me a little side-eye and decamps for one of her other beds. Hilarious! Peaceful!

The poor little newdog is absolutely HUNGRY. I can see and feel every rib and her spine is one long line of no-muscle. So very sad. (I'm guessing she should wind up at about 10 lbs.) But she's really sweet and has warmed up in her trusting amazingly over the last 4 hours. I've got to re-feed her very small amounts 4x/day.

I was most anxious about Pooch who has been positively hostessy with the mostessy, compared to what I was worrying about. I'm amazed. I reared a prima donna and she's become a saint!

I'm just feeling good inside. Think I needed an additional being to love and here she is. So far so good.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on April 23, 2022, 11:02:52 AM
Amazing, Hops!! So glad pooch is on board and helping rather than mucking up the works.

I hope she doesn't regret her choices!

I love the idea of this new little spirit extending trust and receiving your tender care.  It's heartbreaking how devoted dogs want to be.

I'm going to dance about your happy story, Hops!  YES.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on April 23, 2022, 11:34:59 AM
My beloved Pooch is behaving like Florence Nightingpooch. I'm awed at her grace. She occasionally approaches for some personal bellyrubbing and reassuring (I explained she is the Queen of my universe and always will be, and Newgirl can be a princess if it all works out.)

Seriously, Pooch has surprised me (because she's dog-aggressive on leash). I think she's been lonely for a dog friend. When I talk to her (we have very detailed one-way conversations) about Newgirl, I swear she grasps a lot of it. I use a lot of simple terms and have said delightedly:

This is Pooch's puppy! Pooch has a puppy! Pooch has a new friend! (The latter is what I tell her every time a stranger comes to visit.) She's been a little confused but also wags her tail as those magic words. She just watches Newgirl and is peaceful.

Pooch at one time (before I adopted her) had puppies, they don't know how many litters. I felt that she carried sadness about them (it was recent as her teats were enlarged) and talked to her about that our first afternoon on the couch together. This may sound weird but I do believe in emotional communications with animals: I gently pinched her teats and said in absolute gentleness: I'm so sorry you lost your puppies. Pooch heaved a great sigh, and then relaxed. It was a powerful moment.

So, dunno exactly what will happen with these two, but they're coexisting very peacefully and Pooch seems quite careful around Newgirl's fragility. I've been emailing the foster team a few updates as Newgirl might have a respiratory problem, but it might be transient. I'll take her in for a checkup on Monday if she's not better. Otherwise, she's wagging her tail, follows me around.

She's so small and fragile (esp. with ribs sticking out) that I feel I'm living with a baby bird. She's just delicate. But very very sweet and I'm glad I fetched her.

Thanks for listening to all this!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on April 23, 2022, 10:38:53 PM
Oh how terribly satisfying and gratifying your foster experience has been, Hops!  I think dogs are psychic, personally.  It sure seems pooch understands.

Keep updating.  What a lovely connection you've made.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on April 24, 2022, 10:51:21 AM
I'm certain she has bordatella and am a little frustrated they didn't tell me to bring her in yesterday (their clinic provides free care for the first few weeks). They wanted me to capture the coughing seizures (a few each morning) on video and I'm just too AM-foggy and fumbly with the dang new phone to get it on in time.

But I HAVE read multiple descriptions of a bordatella cough online, and it fits. I've emailed them again and wait for instructions. She is SO frail that getting pneumonia could kill her.

She was vaccinated mid-March but got it anyway. I had Pooch get the jab the day before brining newgirl home, but so far she seems fine.

Might move this stuff to a thread about Animals but gotta go do other stuff.

:(
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on April 24, 2022, 12:49:27 PM
Overdoing the anxiety, I think. After the morning horrid coughing spasm she's been quiet. Not a lot of vigor but enjoying naps on the patio or curled by the big glass front door so she can watch the street (and the crows).

I forgot to mention that the bordatella vax does work (though it's no guarantee like any vax) -- and that if a vaxxed dog does get it, the case should be a lot milder. So despite the sound effects, I do think she'll be okay. Fingers crossed! She's lovely.

The SPCA foster team is excellent. They email daily and invite every question you've got. I described her symptoms/behavior in detail and today's foster-liaison asked great questions and she'll pass along the info to the clinic people. They'll decide whether she's urgent or tomorrow will be okay, or I should go pick up meds (some dogs weather bordatella without much intervention) etc. Plenty of support.

PS A doglady friend I send her pic to said 1) I'm in love, and 2) she looks like Pooch's Mini Me, just white (she's almost all white but some brown in her fur too).
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on April 24, 2022, 06:23:59 PM
I know, I'm certifiable around-the-bend old lady wacko.

BABY'S FIRST WORD!

She barked! At something out front (she likes the open door with full-length glass storm door). Kind of a little yodel-yap. Not annoying. Big surprise! And then she acted playful all of a sudden.

Damn I'm enjoying this. I've introduced her to two friends via Zoom. FUN.

Yup. Around the bend wacky old crow-dog-whatever thing has been my destiny.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on April 24, 2022, 11:20:14 PM
Eh...I spent my day talking to trees and bushes.  Tending to them.  Asking them if they want too live, so baby's first words is adorable to me!!!

Glad she's feeling better, Hops.

Light
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on April 25, 2022, 03:41:03 AM
Thanks, Lighter.

As small a creature as she is, it's an adjustment. She's perking up and playful, I'm feeling the pressure of needing to housebreak a 5 y/o dog. She doesn't understand how a leash works either.

All will be well, it'll just take time and lots of patience. She's the perfect little addition for us though, I still believe. If in a week or so she's much stronger and safer and medically well, and if I then think I've bitten off more than I should've, then I'll have foster-prepared her to be strong enough to adjust to a new family. Hope that's not likely but it's a small possibility.

(Started quailing a little bit over heart fears. Half the time when I bend over for anything, I'm really light headed when I come up again and have to grab something, and the SOB - shortness of breath - is persistent. But soon I'll know. My test is the 2nd and f/u with cardiol the 4th.)

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on April 25, 2022, 11:51:01 PM
Breathe, Hops.  Breathe and don't lean into fear. Try not to assume the worst if you can help it.

Worry and fear aren't helpful, IME.

I hope tests bring clarity and good news.

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on April 26, 2022, 11:34:49 AM
You are so right.
I was losing the fear battle.

Here, today, daylight, two pooches napping and no new puddles indoors, having expressed it all both here and to poet friend...I'm breathing better.

Need to do self-calming or meditation FIRST. Before it builds.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on April 26, 2022, 09:55:08 PM
Yes to getting ahead of fear, ((Hops.))

Light
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 29, 2022, 12:46:11 PM
(I need to keep that up, Lighter. It's my biggest challenge: getting ahead of fear.)

Meanwhile, today, there is no "relationship" -- just an upcoming first (perhaps a one-off, ya know) date. Fun to anticipate.

I'm about to cancel the dating site before it renews. But one guy popped up and I enjoyed what I read. Key things to me: A comment that indicates political fit (he's not conservative), identified as agnostic (a unicorn!!!) and his pix indicated a huge interest in trains (which my Dad loved). One pic of him in the cab was captioned "My office." He sounds intelligent, is living fully (traveling through states to see siblings and blues perfomances) and sounds very interesting. Not sure about any of the rest but he's emailed promptly and seems to be anticipating it too.

We're meeting late afternoon today for a glass of wine and then dinner at a little town in between. (He lives over the mountain, no big distance.)

Caveat: It's clear he's a serious cat man, and I'm genuinely allergic. Can't breathe living with a cat. Then again, amazingly, we're not at the living-together question. LOLOLOLOL!

I will of course report back. It's fun to tell y'all everything.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on August 29, 2022, 02:24:16 PM
Maybe have that glass of wine out of doors...... just in case the cat fur issue is more serious than ya'think.

You don't need an itchy nose and watering swollen eyes during the first chat, but lets see where this goes!

A lovely conversation over a glass or two of vino can be just that, or something more.

No expectations.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 29, 2022, 02:47:22 PM
Exactly. Anticipating but not expecting...I'm holding that distinction.

I'm only meeting people for any reason only outdoors (or one-off friend visits in my home where I can create sufficient fresh air circulation and seating distance). We're meeting where there's a nice open-sided tall outdoor tent, and I ain't hugging ChooChooCatMan regardless.

:)
hugs
Hops

PS I wouldn't mind about some itchy-sneezy reaction, it's just when my "reactive airways" can slam shut. Like asthma, but without wheezing.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 29, 2022, 10:13:02 PM
Lovely man, fascinating life!
Had a great time!

Many differences but maybe no core ones.
Mutual click on several levels. Gorgeous eyes
and smile. Humble sorta Maine background,
steely about values. Hmmm.

Really enjoyed meself! We talked our heads off.

More later, wine's gotta wear off.

Night and hugs,
Hops

PS  Know what he said after I confessed my cat allergy? "We'd work around it."
Purrrrrrr.....
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on August 30, 2022, 06:35:12 PM
Yay YAy, Hops.

Lots to think about.  I'm so glad it went well and you had a good time.

How does he feel about doggies>

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on August 30, 2022, 07:07:04 PM
Dunno.
I'll ask if we get together again.
He sent me home with a 20-min video of his winter still photos...he spent years working for Canadian Pacific. They're really lovely. Has a cool soundtrack, too.

I'm just grateful to have had fun. Feet on brakes.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 04, 2022, 12:30:46 PM
Well, I'm pleased I dunnit a few last times (then let the subscription to the findageezer website lapse). Experiences were good and interesting.

Disentangled from Train Man, who was exotic and has had a fascinating life. But I think he's not a partner candidate (I specifically need to AVOID exotic rebels, I married two of them). I wrote him about my covid precautions and mentioned I wasn't sure we were on the same page, but what did he think....and he responded that he's not going to "live in a bubble" (which I hadn't suggested). I saw that he wouldn't change a single small practice for a couple hours to make me feel more comfortable, and given how much he travels and mingles, I realized we're not a good fit. But with him, the biggest reason is what my T reminded me to pay attention to: Does he ask you any questions about yourself and your own life? Nope. He just didn't. He's looking for someone to fill the gap in his life, but I'm not sure how capable he is of seeing her. Not his fault and I still like him, but don't think we'll see each other again. All okay. Very pleased I had the two-date adventure.

Another man is considerably older but fitter than Train Man, and I did like him. He's more conservative than I am (as are most humans) and likewise interesting. But he honestly explained that he had been connecting with another person from the website, and that might be developing into something, so he felt he didn't want to string me along. Loved this part: if things don't grow into something with her, he'll get back in touch and he and I can "start again". Made me laugh, that he was so transparently explaining I'd be a Plan B. Really didn't offend me a bit because that's the way life goes. (He was married for 55 years, so is not slick at all in how he communicates -- just straightfoward). I would enjoy seeing him again and appreciated his honesty. But chances are he's on his way to another nice connection that'll be right for him.

Maybe if (when) I get unbearably lonely this winter I'll revive the subscription and correspond with a man or two. I was just hearing from so many that didn't remotely suit or didn't seem to have read a word I said, just reacted to the photo. (Even after I added my current haggard post-pandemic pix!). I also should/could/might join the fancy-schmancy senior center, and make new friends in person.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on October 07, 2022, 12:33:41 PM
I hope someone pops up in real life, Hops, I find the online stuff really difficult.  I did try it again after we moved here but, like you, I've mostly had messages from completely unsuitable men who've not read the profile and I think just contact literally any woman within a certain distance in the hope that one will say yes.  It's hard to sift through and then do the date thing (especially when they tell you you're option two - honesty is great but yeah, no-one likes to know they're someone else's Plan B!  I agree it's better than stringing you along though).  It's good you noticed train guy wasn't asking questions about you.  It's weird how many people do that.  I've only met one couple I don't like since we moved here and it's because they're like that - they just talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and there's no back and forth, it's so tiring.  If I see them I shoot off the other way :)
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on October 07, 2022, 05:28:50 PM
It's good you're not wasting any time trying to figure out IF a guy is more or less than he appears to be, Tupp.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 24, 2022, 08:27:57 AM
I thought about chemist guy's Plan B explanation for a week or so, then realized what I needed to do. Wasn't angry, just something was bothering me about how sweetly and supportively and kindly I'd instantly accepted his plan.

Still did/do completely support his right to be where he is, and appreciated his candor in saying so (though that was only after I'd sensed something was off, and asked). Anyway, I decided about a week ago to write him one last time to tell him I'd realized it wasn't best for me to leave things quite as described. And my request was that if he does get back in touch it be because he genuinely would like to get to know me better, not just because there's a "position vacant." No response but I didn't need one. It was as though I was writing that for me, not him. For a change.

My T nearly did a cartwheel when I told her this, bouncing in her chair. I think we've gradually gotten it through my skull that I've taken on a whole lot of unequal or over-accomodating relationships in my past, because early experience taught me I was supposed to take care of everybody and perhaps I learned to neglect myself.

Seems sort of basic, a self esteem thing. But I'm glad things like that are coming more clear for me. I think right now, "Relationships" is just about connecting and having deeper conversations and doing more to bring myself into the orbits of other people, regardless of gender. Just on faith that I need more social fuel to keep me alive.

Sun's coming into the bedroom window. Morning is beautiful. Crows gathered to yell at me so I scattered peanuts out front. They're so funny. "The diner's open!"

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on October 24, 2022, 02:26:27 PM
::twirling in the sun::.

No crows, but I'm thinking if them happily hanging in your yard, Hops.

I'm right there with your T....
::twirling again::.

Yes.

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on January 27, 2023, 03:46:23 PM
I love the ways things/moments can be two things at once. As long as I SEE it.

Backstory: Holiday period. Tough time to be "alone in the world." But I was weathering it. Y'all may recall my happiness over my NY card, with its amazing pic of Pooch in sunbeams.

I had one left and was pondering: who'd enjoy this? Wellll, partly I'm sure out of the loneliness of the period, a little nostalgia, plus some what-the-hell -- I sent the last one to M. (He really adored Pooch and when I ended things with him, I felt sad about that part.)

Sure enough, I get an immediate email thanking me profusely for the "unexpected and very welcome" beautiful card blah blah (my message was just wishing you well, hope you'll have a great 2023 but the effect was a trigger for him). And he invites me for "dinner and wine" -- usual MO. And says he'd meant to reply with great new pix of his Gdtr (the newborn I fell in love with when he took me to CA to meet the family, who welcomed me as though I was already the kids' grandma).

I reply that getting together isn't a good idea for me, because it'd be "too painful" to revisit that loss but I (and Pooch) wish him well!

He writes again all about his decision to move to CA, which was his exact plan when we met. And a dazzling description of the house he's bought there, 20 minutes from his family. (Remember when I'd agreed to sell my house, leave my home, and join him in a new life there?)

I write back I'm happy for him, just where he needs to be, and congrats on his new home. Buh-bye. But I won't visit because that'd be "too painful" (to revisit the lost dream).

Anyway, in total, I say the words "too painful" in three messages. He ignores that each time and writes something charming and cheery. Writes me again that if I want to visit him just let him know, any time. I write back, no, it'd be "too painful" to hang with his family again, given how things turned out. But I'm happy for him.

He replies, "Just tell me anytime you'd like to visit me..." etc.

My last reply was one word:
"Nope."

Then I blocked his email address and moved on. But I was upset and anxious for several days just from the interaction. Taught me a lot. When a boundary is important for your health or healing, don't poke little holes in it! Feel fine now.

Hugs,
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on January 27, 2023, 05:16:51 PM
Curse those painful reminders, Hops.

You wanted to share a sunny pooch photo and kind thought.

M can't hear a word you're saying, no matter how direct and clear you are.  He just can't.
 
This is practice for your head and heart.  Another lesson and that's ok.

Blicking him seemed wise.

Lighter

 
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on January 27, 2023, 06:15:46 PM
Thanks Lighter, a lot.

I feel fine about the mistake; really do.
Sometimes there's a self-testing curtain call, I think.

Did I learn my lesson?
Do I remember what happened and why?
Do I still believe I did the right thing?


This short exchange with him, although difficult, was validating.
My answer is Yes to all three.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on January 28, 2023, 07:53:56 AM
Was there just a teeny bit of hope that M had also learned to hear/respond to you Hops? Maybe the test was for HIM, ya know.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on January 28, 2023, 01:46:40 PM
From where I'm standing, I think the shock of so many lovely things being cancelled out by a single character flaw.....is difficult to hold in focus.  Sometimes it seems impossible.

Experiencing the dysfunction again, the tightness in my gut, the sick feeling and memory of familiar despair pop back into focus.......and if I bought into hope....if I carry any hope it wasn't as bad as I remember....there's bound to be a bit of energy around it.

Once I have it firmly internalized....once it's living in my conscious and unconscious belief system,without doubt, all the energy surrounding the thing/belief/person/reality, ime..... goes with.

That's why buying into anyone else's opinions is so powerful.  The power comes from within ourselves, not from outside us.

Hops, I suspect you were checking your perceptions for changes and not M. 

That's how I read your response.

Lighter

Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on January 28, 2023, 05:19:59 PM
Perceptive questions as ever, y'all! Lighter, exactly what triggering or reliving stuff like that feels like, somatically. Mine is easing but I really understood that description.

I think it was probably a combo of both, but mainly a not-very-conscious test of myself. I didn't FLUNK, but did compose a kind of "what-part-of-this-emotional-common-sense do you not understand" reply before I quickly junked it. I noticed my residual anger, which bothered me for two days. Didn't hurt me to notice it.

M repeating his invitation was standard MO: repeat repeat repeat repeat until he gets his way. I actually loved his last word, that I'm "stubborn" (so similar to "resistant" -- remember that gem?), because all it meant was: "You said NO to me! This does not compute!"

My last word felt just fine. Sufficient. Off he goes to CA, I do wish him well, and my growth continues here. Might still find a geezer; one never knows.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on January 29, 2023, 11:09:45 AM
I guess M is a good case study of the difference between people who can/want to become an equal partner in a relationship - and those who have mastered the APPEARANCE of same, in order to function in society at a less intimate level; for whatever reason, they don't have the ability to actually cooperate with another person at the emotional level. Society tends to provide alternate rewards which is a validation of sorts.

The main thing to take away from that experience, I guess, is that contact with others is needed - connection; and that you're able to be confident in your abilities to protect yourself now, Hops. I think, that's the little bit of anger you noticed - a natural response to not just, not HEARING you - but the understanding that he's not able to see things from other people's shoes. A melancholy sort of empathy, that he'll probably never "get" those kinds of rewards of being open & receptive to other people's feelings.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on January 29, 2023, 12:59:39 PM
Wise and perceptive takeaways, Amber.

The first makes sense because M really is an extraordinarily talented masker. He has been performing nonstop his whole life. Where he feels most alive is in the solitude of his scholarship, and he has no limits and great success there.

I do feel empathy for him, as I did for Nmom, who was the same. Actual connection or intimacy is blocked by inability to tolerate others' pain. And buried deep, I believe he carries a lot of unrecognized shame. If he can't force others to fit his agenda, he is afraid, I believe. So he just increased his force and felt angry when I was "resistant." He's not inspired by enduring the discomfort of inner growth, because there is money, there is food, there is wine, there is travel. He spins fast, and his older age is going to be different than the endless visions of it he spun -- for himself, and for me.

My frustration was seeing what we both were missing out on. I remember my first husband quitting joint therapy. He wrote me a letter years after our divorce apologizing for that and acknowledging that if he hadn't, we might have been able to save our marriage. That was so impressive to me, and I told him I forgave him completely and was so moved that he'd sent me that letter. Healing tears.

With M, no apology or reflection or accountability would ever have been offered, because I believe he senses unaware that he would shatter. And that is very sad.

But no longer anything for me to be invested in. It was what it was and I took much too long to fully accept it.

Interesting New Year detour, or reflection. VERY important in that it showed me how I'm responsible, by myself, for not toying with fantasy, revisiting old wounds I've mostly healed from, or spending time in denial of any kind. Who knew what sending a card would trigger? I should have resisted that brief urge, but it's okay.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on February 01, 2023, 05:22:05 AM
He's still eligible for an arse kicking from me, Hopsie, don't make me come over there!  Lol.  I do know with myself that I've sometimes got to a point with a former relationship where the nice bits are on my mind more than the reasons it finished.  Then I do what you did; I reach out because I see a funny article I know they'd like or find a photo that I know they'd appreciate.  Then their response, like M's, makes me remember why we don't do that anymore.  I think sometimes you just need the reminder.  As frustrating as it may be at the time.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on February 03, 2023, 10:32:32 AM
I'd love to make you come over here, Tupp! We could sell tickets for the arse-kicking and schedule it at the farm sanctuary. Options for attendees:
hug a pig, tickle a sheep, watch Tupp make dents with her boots in M's posterior.
Hard choices....

You're exactly right, I was needing the reminder.
What I have to resolve next is how I feel about how much the exchange upset me.
That reveals that sometimes what I tell myself about myself isn't true.
I'm certainly over the relationship, it's not that...but dismayed at how anxious I became. Just from two or three emails! I guess what it says is that I am still vulnerable and his way of relating churns up a lot of fear and pain.

Don't need that ever again if I can avoid it. The bizarre reaction to loneliness of the last several years has been in a way increased fear of people, when being with people more is actually what I need.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 20, 2023, 06:08:12 PM
Fooled ya! I'm not in a new relationship with an individual, but this is a quick update about my relationship with the community.

Our local version of www.vtvnetwork.org (http://www.vtvnetwork.org) is launching now. I'm feeling joy and pride about my work. I was VP, now head up Outreach and Marketing.

Just finished a comprehensive, 6-panel brochure that's off to the printer tomorrow, our designer did a gorgeous job, and I'm feeling happy and fulfilled. It's surprising! Also got our elegant flyers back from the printer, and feel proud of those as well.

We'll pass both out everywhere and I feel a lot of joy that it's taking off. (Mostly due to our inspiring leader, the Pres.) So many lonely or struggling elders here will find life easier and happier now, because of this new nonprofit.

That's it. Just wanted to share this moment and figured this thread would do.

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on September 23, 2023, 02:12:18 AM
Aw Hopsie, that's amazing!  I had a look at the link you put up; I know you've mentioned it on here before but I'd somehow missed that it's a whole nationwide scheme that's in place.  What an amazing idea and so nice that you've been able to be so involved in it all and get it off the ground :)  I really firmly believe that those sort of community connections are such a big help.  Sometimes it's something small, like a lightbulb that needs changing.  But if you can't get up a step-ladder yourself and you don't have anyone to ask - that's a lonely place to be.  To know you've a local contact that can get someone to come over and help you out will be such a big thing for so many people.  I'm so happy it's all coming together and it's been so enjoyable for you to do.  Is it a big group of people that have been setting it all up or just a few of you?
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on September 23, 2023, 12:22:07 PM
Thanks, Tupp! Was patting myself on the back so hard it's a wonder I still have shoulder blades.

The Pres of our "Village" startup I met, along with five others, not long before the pandemic. Went to two meetings before it hit. I had learned about the idea of helping elders who: don't want to or can't move to a "retirement community" -- helping them live at home for as long as possible with a strong network of volunteers for all sorts of things. Rides to the doctor (accompanying them in to take notes if requested), small home chores or repairs, help with computers or electronic devices -- thinning a flower bed or walking a dog for that matter. Changing overhead light bulbs was one somebody came up with. Whatever they need, if a volunteer can match it, they'll have the visit/connection/friendship etc with a caring person who wants to help them age at home more easily. Only NON-medical services from background-checked, trained volunteers. Probably most of our volunteers will be older but quite able, but the range for joining as members is 55+. When we interview prospective volunteers, we ask what possible services we could list. Some can drive but not lift, some love to help organize, some are bilingual, some are very comfortable with electronics, or dogs. All depends on who decides to join. Each member request for service will be matched against our volunteers' skills and availability.

It's been really successful -- 300 Villages so far. It's just a huge need. Too many elders who live in the community (rather than a "senior silo") are isolated, too many have no family to help them, etc etc. There's been a lot of national research on it and the gap in support is clear -- as is the difference it makes to all involved.

The original small group of folks I met had splintered during the pandemic: one's spouse was declining, others were just burned out. It's a LOT of work. But one, our Pres, revived it all about two years ago and I climbed on board when she asked me. I had loved the concept the moment I heard of it (perfect demographic myself) and she is amazing. Long career as a national leader in midwifery, setting up professional programs in two countries, still on accreditation and review boards. Remarkable woman. I find it fascinating that she built structures to support people in community for the start of life, and now she's doing the same for people in the later chapters.

We've grown to an 8-member Board (moi included) and are launching the volunteer and member drive now, with publicity, public information sessions, and the brochures and flyers. Media is interested, and we have an excellent Advisory Board: Dr.-head of geriatrics and a lovely woman in a high post in nursing at the university hospital, former CFO of the whole region's largest senior services board, present CEO of the same, and a few more. A med student organization is interested, likewise a nursing student program -- not in giving medical services, but just volunteering like everybody in order to get to know the needs of older people living in the community. (They'll learn about needed health services for their public health work and from visiting older folks in their own homes.)

We'll find out when we find out, but I have a feeling it'll take off here. ML, the Pres, is indefatigable, can multi-task like a maniac, and I can keep cranking out friendly, clear PR and documentation etc. She asks me to do small speeches with her because she's a PhD Power Point sort, very skilled at presenting data, and I'm just all passionate about how this society values or discards elders. Plus, I'm a perky public speaker and for some reason audiences warm to me. Must be the dimples, or sometimes I'm funny.

Whew. Gotta try to help THIS old woman get her laundry done!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Twoapenny on September 24, 2023, 01:42:04 AM
It's a great idea.  I really like (with projects like that) the way that people can swap skills, almost without realising it - ie, the chap comes round to change the lightbulb, and while he's there gets a cuppa with some home made cookies, or the older person has stories to share about some event that particularly interests them (something they went to years ago, something like that).  Or they can swap gardening tips, or the older person knows how to get that particular stain out of that T shirt they mention they now use for work because of the mark on it, do you know what I mean?  Just that general exchange of what it is to be human that I think has been lost through TV and social media and all these external sources which, can be good in some ways, but which I think have had a negative effect in others.  Whatever else it brings beyond the practical support, it's a brilliant idea, and shows what a bit of organisation can achieve.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on October 07, 2023, 09:37:09 PM
I'm so happy for you, ((Hops!!))

What an accomplishment and will make such a difference in your community!

You did good: )

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on October 08, 2023, 07:07:21 PM
Thanks, Lighter!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 26, 2023, 05:02:08 PM
Happy update on my relationship to the UU congregation:

Y'all might remember that I've done "lay sermons" now and then in the past. Today was my 7th (my 6th was also about the environment and 13 years ago). I was anxious about being up for it, being compelling and engaging, etc...and after stroke and health wobbles and ER visits I feared I might have a wave of something in the pulpit. Did for a moment or two, but it passed.

Thought about it, kind of prepping my internal ground, for a week or so, and wrote it in 8 hours yesterday. "A Personal Planet" was the title. Anyway, there I was and it went very well. I included humor, love, compassion (for planet and for self) and a recurring thing about contemplating the differences between need and craving when it comes to consumerism, which is basically what's destroying the earth. You can consume stupid plastic, fuel including the most polluting (air travel) without really connecting the dots.

And it kinda rocked. I felt validated and affirmed for the deepest part of me -- being a writer, and knowing and valuing the oral tradition. Poems and sermons (in my case, very agnostic, no deity involved) aren't very far apart. So I'm feeling verrrrrrry grateful. And sort of welcomed back (not that anybody was not welcoming before, but I felt alienated for a long time after the previous Nminister)....new minister is kind, smart, and does his job really well. I was really happy when he asked me if I could do it today.

I think I'll go back as often as I can, and build new connections with old friends and new UUs. It's still the best chance I have to feel part of an extended family I do love, and I'd be a fool to let that belonging wither. That, plus the local "Village" project, anchor me in belonging to groups that feel meaningful and bigger than me.

I'm just happy. Didn't hurt my ego, either, to have a lot of people come up to shake my hand and tell me they really liked it. I felt affirmed, acknowledged and fulfilled. The music director said he's going to push for me to be invited to do it again. Wow.

hugs
a happy Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on November 27, 2023, 09:30:59 AM
Congrats Hops! I'm happy a door seems to be opening for you.

I believe that a whole lot of people are suffering from a mindset nutritional deficiency; sorta like what happens without enough Vit C in your diet. And any time they can partake of a positive perspective on the issues of the day, more often "discussed" through competing shouting... the more hopeful they feel (and perhaps the less they'll blindly go along with the shouters - after all, you're giving them a CHOICE).

Good job!
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: lighter on November 28, 2023, 09:31:05 PM
I'm so happy for you, Hops!  What an amazingly brave thing to do.... step outside of your comfort zone and share your gifts and knowledge with your immediate community. 

If you don't mind, I'd love to read your sermon. 

Lighter
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 29, 2023, 03:07:12 PM
I'm sorry, Lighter.
I have such paranoia about posting creative stuff online, just never made the transition to being comfortable about the loss of privacy. I've had a few near-misses about that.

But I'm flattered you asked!

hugs
Hops
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: Hopalong on November 30, 2023, 02:02:53 PM
Well, so it goes. I got a very unexpected email from the minister tearing me a new one for changing one element of the service from its current format. Doesn't matter what it was but the message I got was (my interpretations in italics)... who do you think you are, you should have asked me first, how dare you, know your place!, we need to have a conversation about what is and is not the role of a guest speaker if you'll ever be in the pulpit again, etc....

I was stunned. I don't know what got into him but wow. I felt crushed, actually. It was such a full-circle, love-overflowing, joy-filled moment for me that to have that response from him was devastating.

I'm okay now, waiting to see if he really wants to talk about it. To check if I was crazy I shared his message with a few friends in confidence and they were all shocked too.

Big spiral of...do I threaten male ministers when I do something that really moves the congregation and brings a lot of praise? Is it really a balls problem? Or is it me and I exude some kind of "don't need your approval" vibe? It never occurred to me because as a past "worship weaver" the then-ministers had offered us full freedom and much support and delighted in whatever we created. (We had a yoga enthusiast sit in that crossed-legs-in-your-lap position on the altar once years ago! People were delighted.)

It's a fact that it's been 13 years since I preached and stuff there has gotten a lot more formal than I generally enjoy, but I truly was not trying to be insurrectionist or disrespectful anything like that. I had thought when he heard how it went he'd be proud of me!

Anyway, I'm okay now. Really. I know where I was coming from. Love 'n joy. But wow, from the heights to the depths, kinda thing.

Life. Lessons keep coming about reality vs expectations. I guess we need them.

hugs
Hops

PS In case anybody's curious or has church memories, the service element was Joys & Sorrows, which used to be an intimate time when a person could stand up and share from the heart something deeply felt, with their congregation, by telling it personally. Since we're bigger, because of time constraints, it's been changed in recent years to "fill out this form online" and a minister or worship helper will read it. A lot less moving than people speaking to their "brethen" (not our terminology) themselves, but I'd understood the change as just part of growth. Since I'd missed the vulnerability of that kind of community sharing and we were a smaller group Sunday after Tgiving anyway, I requested to revert to the "come up to the mic" moment --my official "worship weaver" helper was fine with it and great to work with-- and about 5 people did. I heard afterward that some people were happy to see it again. I'd asked that each person limit theirs to one minute and all did.

(The new version was to have anybody with a Joy or Sorrow come up and put a rock into a big bowl of water --a very nice ritual-- but not speak.)

That was all there was to it. About 8-10 minutes out of the whole hour's script.
Title: Re: Relationship/s
Post by: sKePTiKal on December 01, 2023, 09:37:11 AM
Well, we can't ever anticipate how people react to things we say and do, Hops. Obviously, your intention was well-considered and benign... and he saw it as a threat to his control/importance. Maybe after the first stings of that go away, he'll see it differently. And maybe not.

There is an unspoken (perhaps unperceived) tension lately between people. I feel it; sense it; when we're out - which is very very little these days. But even phone calls have become exercises in patience as one navigates the computer tree (AI) and then finally get a human being... only to have to repeat everything for 3rd time, for "security purposes". SIGH.

It seems to be a combination of fear of being taken advantage of, and denial of the amount of "brokenness" in what used to work so smoothly. Some of that is also financial sticker-shock... and fear of not being able to make ends meet.