I say, it takes a monumental sense of self-obsessive pride and entitlement.
The moment I decide that I'm better than x,y,z -
Usually, it begins by my deluding myself into thinking that I know someone else's motivation
Carolyn
Blaming the victim FOR being a victim is double abuse!
Ami
I say, it takes a monumental sense of self-obsessive pride and entitlement.
The moment I decide that I'm better than x,y,z -
Usually, it begins by my deluding myself into thinking that I know someone else's motivation
Carolyn
Ahhhhhhhhh, Carolyn.
You've brought part of the equation into sharp relief... at least for me.
Immediately, Mud's guidance comes to mind, from long ago.
I'm paraphrasing his words here.....
"When explaining egregiouse behavior......
simply state the facts without assigning motive... let the listener do that for themselves."
Because then it says something about them. ::nod::
Assigning motive says something about us.
Mud said it plainly... and yet here I am, finding I have to be reminded, yet again.
Thank you for this, Carolyn.... did you write it yourself?
Lighter
This is getting a bit beyond weird, so I'm going to mention it.
On more occasions than I can count, I've noticed that when I post after Leah, she returns to the thread, deletes her previous post, and re-posts it after mine.
I don't want to assume or assign motives, I'm only mentioning it because - like I said - I find it exceedingly odd.
Carolyn
YES
THE ONE TO BLAME FOR YOUR ABUSE IS YOUR ABUSER! AMEN Ami
This is getting a bit beyond weird, so I'm going to mention it.
On more occasions than I can count, I've noticed that when I post after Leah, she returns to the thread, deletes her previous post, and re-posts it after mine.
I don't want to assume or assign motives, I'm only mentioning it because - like I said - I find it exceedingly odd.
Carolyn
Carolyn,
You may not have found it so odd, IF you had conversed with me, and asked me why I GENERALLY (not just your post) sometimes do delete the previous post AFTER editting the post due to my error (grammar error i.e. comma's - which has been pointed out to me on the board - failure to use spellcheck - or addition - or complete mess in the way I have written something - as I am not a professional writer .......... no surprise!).
Because, I choose to do so.
No rules for typing here, thank goodness.
Love,
Leah
This is getting a bit beyond weird, so I'm going to mention it.
On more occasions than I can count, I've noticed that when I post after Leah, she returns to the thread, deletes her previous post, and re-posts it after mine.
I don't want to assume or assign motives, I'm only mentioning it because - like I said - I find it exceedingly odd.
Carolyn
Carolyn,
You may not have found it so odd, IF you had conversed with me, and asked me why I GENERALLY (not just your post) sometimes do delete the previous post AFTER editting the post due to my error (grammar error i.e. comma's - which has been pointed out to me on the board - failure to use spellcheck - or addition - or complete mess in the way I have written something - as I am not a professional writer .......... no surprise!).
Because, I choose to do so.
No rules for typing here, thank goodness.
Love,
Leah
No, indeed, Leah... I do still find it exceedingly odd... and well beyond the reasoning you've stated here.
You add to your posts all the time, via the edit function.
But when you move your posts ahead on the thread, it's when I've posted after you.
Been watching this for ages, so there's no doubt about it in my mind.
I have your post in question from this thread saved, because I'd wondered whether you'd do the same thing again (as you've already done elsewhere, today).
There are no substantial changes.
In other words, I don't believe you, Leah... but that's okay. I can live with that.
I just wanted to state the facts as I've observed them and now I can let it go.
Carolyn
Carollyn,
You can't do anything to upset me, not anymore.
You think that others do and behave as you do.
Well, sorry, but they don't always do as you do.
Love,
Leah
Carollyn,
You can't do anything to upset me, not anymore.
You think that others do and behave as you do.
Well, sorry, but they don't always do as you do.
Love,
Leah
I'm not trying to upset you, Leah.
As odd as your behavior has seemed to me, it seemed even more odd for me to pretend like I hadn't noticed.
So I'm making it clear in this way - yes, I have noticed.
I could have just played the game of moving my own posts beyond yours, time after time, but that would surely feel like a regression.
Carolyn
This is getting a bit beyond weird, so I'm going to mention it.
On more occasions than I can count, I've noticed that when I post after Leah, she returns to the thread, deletes her previous post, and re-posts it after mine.
I don't want to assume or assign motives, I'm only mentioning it because - like I said - I find it exceedingly odd.
Carolyn
Carolyn,
You may not have found it so odd, IF you had conversed with me, and asked me why I GENERALLY (not just your post) sometimes do delete the previous post AFTER editting the post due to my error (grammar error i.e. comma's - which has been pointed out to me on the board - failure to use spellcheck - or addition - or complete mess in the way I have written something - as I am not a professional writer .......... no surprise!).
Because, I choose to do so.
No rules for typing here, thank goodness.
Love,
Leah
No, indeed, Leah... I do still find it exceedingly odd... and well beyond the reasoning you've stated here.
You add to your posts all the time, via the edit function.
But when you move your posts ahead on the thread, it's when I've posted after you.
Been watching this for ages, so there's no doubt about it in my mind.
I have your post in question from this thread saved, because I'd wondered whether you'd do the same thing again (as you've already done elsewhere, today).
There are no substantial changes.
In other words, I don't believe you, Leah... but that's okay. I can live with that.
I just wanted to state the facts as I've observed them and now I can let it go.
Carolyn
Carolyn,
You must have nothing better to do, than watch Leah's every move, and save Leah's posts, and check to see what Leah is doing.
You clearly have had an issue with me, and that is YOUR ownership, not mine.
All because I dared to question.
Love,
Leah
Carolyn,
I don't concern myself with how others choose to type their words, edit, add, review, highlight, and do whatever it is they wish to do - in their choice of expression and style.
They can delete, change, re-post as many times as they wish to.
So long as they don't post abusively and harmfully,
then I am happy to live and let live, in allowing freedom of expression in an individuals own choice of style, and ability.
Love,
Leah
Leah,
This feels like you are trying to shame me for having noticed this odd behavior in the first place.
Well, I am not ashamed.
I'm glad that I spoke up about it because what's out in the light can no longer simmer and stew.
Carolyn
"lastworditis"
This is all to distract from the ethos of the postings here on this thread which are to do with RE-VICTIMIZATION OF THE VICTIM
Please, know Carolyn that I have forgiven you, and I do again, forgive you now,
for all the hurt and pain I endured when you ceased to love me as your "sister" in Christ
and I sat in silence. I trusted you with my real name.
And all because I dared to question regarding the book.
"dared to question regarding the book",
"you ceased to love me as your "sister" in Christ",
Thanks, Lighter.
I do have something else to say, re: this -QuotePlease, know Carolyn that I have forgiven you, and I do again, forgive you now,
for all the hurt and pain I endured when you ceased to love me as your "sister" in Christ
and I sat in silence. I trusted you with my real name.
And all because I dared to question regarding the book.
Although I see little actual historical fact in this statement,
I can feel the pain.
Years ago, when my eldest daughter repeatedly violated our household rules, I told her once and for all that if she was going to remain within our household, she would be required to adhere to those basic rules of truth and respect.
She chose to move out.
Immediately, she began telling all of her friends that her mom had thrown her out.
No doubt she was hurting... but not because of anything I had done.
It was her own choice to violate my boundaries which created her hurt.
Leah, I don't know how to acknowledge your pain and still remain in reality, but I'd like to try.
I'm sorry that you have suffered such hurt and pain.
Yes, Leah, you trusted me with your real name.
I have not abused that trust.
I would never share your real name with anyone.
Carolyn is my real name, by the way.
I have no idea what you mean by saying that youQuote"dared to question regarding the book",
I don't recall any book.
What I recall is your badgering me, simply because I'd backed away from communication with you on this board.
Apparently, you did not think that I should have that option.
I now see that you interpreted my backing away asQuote"you ceased to love me as your "sister" in Christ",
but drawing boundaries is not a cessation of love, Leah.
I'm sorry that people have left you in the past, but I am not they... and I won't allow you to punish me in their place.
As just another wounded person on a recovery message board, I will not accept that role in your life.
Carolyn
No, Carolyn
The Book came first - that was when in PM land you denied my question regarding your censureship of the book I had posted onto the board.
No, Carolyn
The Book came first - that was when in PM land you denied my question regarding your censureship of the book I had posted onto the board.
Leah,
Maybe "the book" came first for you, but only you would know that.
I never gave anything about a book another thought... and I don't recall anything about the denial of a question in pm.
What I recall is that you posted a link here on the board and I pm'd you to say that I wasn't sure about that website's accuracy.
If there was a book involved, I've forgotten.
Have you been thinking, all this time, that I stopped talking with you because you posted something I considered inappropriate? Is that it?
Carolyn
I posted a book, you PM'd me to say that the book was an inappropriate Christian book title and I ought to delete the post.
Then shortly afterward, I sent to you a PM with the thread link on the board (posted at a time when I was not on board posting) wherein I had found the book, with your positive posting regarding the book.
And so in my PM to you I questioned.
Leah, I would very much like to see these pm's you cite:QuoteI posted a book, you PM'd me to say that the book was an inappropriate Christian book title and I ought to delete the post.
Then shortly afterward, I sent to you a PM with the thread link on the board (posted at a time when I was not on board posting) wherein I had found the book, with your positive posting regarding the book.
And so in my PM to you I questioned.
Thank you.
Carolyn
Leah, I would very much like to see these pm's you cite:QuoteI posted a book, you PM'd me to say that the book was an inappropriate Christian book title and I ought to delete the post.
Then shortly afterward, I sent to you a PM with the thread link on the board (posted at a time when I was not on board posting) wherein I had found the book, with your positive posting regarding the book.
And so in my PM to you I questioned.
Thank you.
Carolyn
Carolyn,
As you wish, please bear in mind that I have to trawl back through a few months of postings and it won't be instantaneous.
Love,
Leah
Lighter,
I did ask you, with a personal boundary,
PS. Lighter, please respect my personal post to Carolyn and kindly refrain from interjection, thanking you with gratitude.
Why have you chose to ignore my personal boundary, request?
And
Why are you extracting one word from my post
and
Gaslighting me?
Gaslighting muddies a persons character, do you actually realize that?
Gaslighting in effect depersonalizes and invalidates a person reality of experience and being.
I am working on finding the PMs at this moment for Carolyn as she has requested.
Love, Leah.
Lighter,
Maybe I'm wrong, but I think that saying to someone, "you're a liar" - is a judgment on her character...
whereas saying to someone, "I don't believe you" - is the assignation of a boundary, the drawing of a line in the sand, even.
I think that's more like saying, "prove it".
This is the approach I took with npd-ex. All I got in response was bluster and more smokescreens. That's how you know what you've got, in the end.
Speaking plainly is always an option... if you're detached from the outcome.
Carolyn
Lighter,
Maybe I'm wrong, but I think that saying to someone, "you're a liar" - is a judgment on her character...
whereas saying to someone, "I don't believe you" - is the assignation of a boundary, the drawing of a line in the sand, even.
I think that's more like saying, "prove it".
This is the approach I took with npd-ex. All I got in response was bluster and more smokescreens. That's how you know what you've got, in the end.
Speaking plainly is always an option... if you're detached from the outcome.
Carolyn
I can honestly say that I've seen this dynamic, in 3d and on the board.....
and there will always be those who deny it's bluster and smoke screen we're seeing, when we KNOW what it is.
Whether it's one group from this year or the last.... it's similar in that there's always going to be confusion surrounding it....
terrible thing.
Are you saying that "you know what you've got" is the operative phrase here?
I can't imagine a life where I have enough experience and knowledge about dark things to see the man behind the curtain..... and not be able to talk about it bc of those who say they don't see it...... so I must be wrong.... along with judgemnts about making that observation.
That's something I'm going to have to think about for a while.
OK...
Here's where the circle comes back around.
I make an observation, "I don't believe you."
That can be perceived as a negative criticism and will be turned into one by a gaslighter, always. Thats the way they work.
SO..... whoever was on the receiving end of the observation will come back with an observation of their own....
they might claim that statement to be "an attack, gaslighting, predatory, cruel" for instance.... sometimes their supporters do it for them.
Now... thats just an observation on their part, right?
Though it makes a statement on one's character, no doubt. Just an observation bc they say it is.
My point is.... if they're response is THE smokescreen... the blustering.... how does one tell the difference, when standing on the outskirts of the skirmish?
You say it's the form.
Had they come back with a response that drew boundaries, questioned and asked for clarification.... then we would see the absense of blustering and gaslighting?
When the form takes on criticism, namecalling, judgements..... then we know what we've got?
Sort of depends on the maturity of the people involved, I think.
Thank you
Had they come back with a response that drew boundaries, questioned and asked for clarification.... then we would see the absense of blustering and gaslighting?
When the form takes on criticism, namecalling, judgements..... then we know what we've got?
Sort of depends on the maturity of the people involved, I think.
This is getting a bit beyond weird, so I'm going to mention it.
On more occasions than I can count, I've noticed that when I post after Leah, she returns to the thread, deletes her previous post, and re-posts it after mine.
I don't want to assume or assign motives, I'm only mentioning it because - like I said - I find it exceedingly odd.
Carolyn
Carolyn,
You may not have found it so odd, IF you had conversed with me, and asked me why I GENERALLY (not just your post) sometimes do delete the previous post AFTER editting the post due to my error (grammar error i.e. comma's - which has been pointed out to me on the board - failure to use spellcheck - or addition - or complete mess in the way I have written something - as I am not a professional writer .......... no surprise!).
Because, I choose to do so.
No rules for typing here, thank goodness.
Love,
Leah
No, indeed, Leah... I do still find it exceedingly odd... and well beyond the reasoning you've stated here.
You add to your posts all the time, via the edit function.
But when you move your posts ahead on the thread, it's when I've posted after you.
Been watching this for ages, so there's no doubt about it in my mind.
I have your post in question from this thread saved, because I'd wondered whether you'd do the same thing again (as you've already done elsewhere, today).
There are no substantial changes.
In other words, I don't believe you, Leah... but that's okay. I can live with that.
I just wanted to state the facts as I've observed them and now I can let it go.
Carolyn
Carolyn,
You must have nothing better to do, than watch Leah's every move, and save Leah's posts, and check to see what Leah is doing.
You clearly have had an issue with me, and that is YOUR ownership, not mine.
All because I dared to question.
Love,
Leah
You agree, through your use of this forum, that you will not post any material which is false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing,
obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy
Quote
You agree, through your use of this forum, that you will not post any material which is false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing,
obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy
Gabben,
You continuous posting of hatred and contempt for me is all too apparent.
You agree, through your use of this forum, that you will not post any material which is false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing,
obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy
You agree, through your use of this forum, that you will not post any material which is false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing,
obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy
And...one last thing:
Leah,
Most nothing I have posted about your behavior is untrue, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, or hateful, or harassing...nada. Your behavior, on the other hand, is covertly aggressive, and dishonest.....I see and many others here do to.
As for confusing you with Nsaint...did I ever put those words out there?...please show me a thread or a post where I ever confused you with Nsaint...are you putting words in my mouth? Mindreading?
No, the exact opposite is that I have not confused you for anyone other than who you are....
All facts...
Lise
Carolyn and Lighter make a great 'tag-team.' They are both so full of holier-than-thou false humility, it would be laughable if it weren't so grotesque. Lise, you are wrong about Leah. I hope I was not wrong about you.
I am amazed how well she keeps her sanity in the chaos and craziness that Lighter is always behind.
Your anger, like any pain, will pass. If someone punches you, he is to blame for your pain, not you. By the same token, the one to blame for your anger is your abuser, not you.
Your anger, like any pain, will pass. If someone punches you, he is to blame for your pain, not you. By the same token, the one to blame for your anger is your abuser, not you.
wow, this tooks the words right out of my mouth....
Dear Bill,
Perhaps if you were not having an affair with Ami, a married woman, your vision of reality would not be so skewed.
You ARE wrong about Leah.....one day the truth will be known.
But, until then...Ami....I am NOT your friend...You can have your N's and P's and your skewed view of reality -- this time you have gone too far in your vendetta with Lighter as to use me as a pawn because of my conflict with Leah.
Friendship over............that is a boundary for me.
Lise
Where is the integrity? here on the board.
When the very person who declared that LeahsRainbow was forbidden from posting onto Gabbens threads can just go and blatantly ignore what the owner of the board, Dr Richard Grossman posted in addressing Gabben (on LeahsRainbow's thread) that Gabben should not post on LeahsRainbow's thread, the directive being fair and reasonable.
Re: alone, please read: Exploring Victim Mentality
« Reply #67 on: June 09, 2008, 11:41:28 PM »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: LeahsRainbow on June 07, 2008, 05:43:54 PM
Your anger, like any pain, will pass. If someone punches you, he is to blame for your pain, not you. By the same token, the one to blame for your anger is your abuser, not you.
wow, this tooks the words right out of my mouth....
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You know quite well, deep within you, that there
What I have done here is taken a piece of an article, not written by you and not on your thread, but on a post.
Gabben,
You say that it is not on my thread, well how come it clearly displays Quote from: LeahsRainbow on June 07, 2008, 05:43:54 PM
Leah
I finally read this thread, from beginning to end........except.....
.....I don't read posts that are copied and pasted from some professional's site. I might have done that myself, in the past, but I find that I don't learn anything more about the poster from such a post. I prefer a poster's own words about herself. I think that that way I can learn more about the person.
The dialogue between Leah and Carolyn, I felt, was done 'well', without anger, just boundaries.
I'm saying this at the end, and it is somewhat what lighter said.... that L. & C. were being well behaved.
I would have preferred that lighter not be chastised on her own thread., but that could have been me.
I was some surprised to suddenly see Gabben arrive on the scene , then the dialogue between her and Ami. That used to be a case of my noticing that Lise followed Ami around the board and supported her. ...opposite to Leah following Carolyn or vise versa (re double post)
Wiltay, on the other hand, was more of a surprise! I often wonder how many times a member PMs another to QUICK!!!!!! get to such-and-such a post and support me!
If anyone is following where my loyaties are, one might think I am against Ami. I am not against her, as a person. She has many mountains to climb. I just hate reading the way she types her posts. There I said it. A comma after the wrong words, lol is out-of date, and there are no spaces between words at times with "too" "many" "quotes" The style does not make me feel I am 'talking with' a human being who attended University.
So my mentality is saying that I prefer better typing, and I do not read Copied and Pasted posts. I would prefer the link, followed by the poster's own opinion.
There is absolutely no offence intended in my post but I have said it now and hope it is understood that it is a part of me, and doesn't have to be a part of anyone else.
We all know many times it is not the person but the behaviour/habits
Iz
It seems to me that you are allowing the evil done to you to grow in your own heart.
I'm not the one having an affair with a married woman whose husband is suicidal....
You know, I have shared my life, as an open book , on the board.
I met the love of my life and am NOT having an affair, but doing EVEYTHING above board.
I am not asking to be believed , just setting the record straight.
Bill is everything that every woman dreams of and God saw fit to give him to me.I try to honor God ,with my life, to the best of my ability. If you want to judge me, you can. Ami
That is so freaking low, Lise.
What you are doing behind your husbands back is low....very low.
It would break his heart and you know it - truth hurts Ami, right?
I'll delete these posts about the affair, because I am not about hurting you, but I do want to make a point about how Bill is here only because Ami asked Bill to so that Ami could use me and my conflict with Leah to try to win Ami's fight with lighter...
Bill has an old bone to pick with lighter.
I could care less about winning, I just care about the truth.
Lise
Lise, I could care less about Lighter. Ami did not put me up to anything-zero. What inspired me was Leah's predicament, which is very similar to my own and also YOURS, I might add. Also, please don't say you're only interested in truth and then make things up.That is so freaking low, Lise.
What you are doing behind your husbands back is low....very low.
It would break his heart and you know it - truth hurts Ami, right?
I'll delete these posts about the affair, because I am not about hurting you, but I do want to make a point about how Bill is here only because Ami asked Bill to so that Ami could use me and my conflict with Leah to try to win Ami's fight with lighter...
Bill has an old bone to pick with lighter.
I could care less about winning, I just care about the truth.
Lise
Dear Lise
I think you can tell from Bill's strength and integrity(even if you disagree with his POV) that HE is not the type of person who would be a "marching clone" for anyone.
Ami
No Lighter....You were almost banned....twice Dr. G has had to warn you.
Bill has never been warned. Bill left the board because of you and your toxic waste that you used to throw at Ami.
And, although I have issues now with Bill and Ami for the lack of truth, I still am not happy with the way you monopolize this board and deceive people.
I also have issues with you for trying to distract everyone and appear so superior when in fact you are the token board bully and everyone knows it. How many of my threads in the past have you tried to hijack before I set some solid limits?
If there is anyone calling the kettle black, Lighter, it is you.
Lise
No Lighter....You were almost banned....twice Dr. G has had to warn you.[/quote]
Bill has never been warned. Bill left the board because of you and your toxic waste that you used to throw at Ami.
And, although I have issues now with Bill and Ami for the lack of truth, I still am not happy with the way you monopolize this board and deceive people.
I also have issues with you for trying to distract everyone and appear so superior when in fact you are the token board bully and everyone knows it. How many of my threads in the past have you tried to hijack before I set some solid limits?
If there is anyone calling the kettle black, Lighter, it is you.
Lise
Lise, can't you see that you are justing making my point?It seems to me that you are allowing the evil done to you to grow in your own heart.
I'm not the one having an affair with a married woman whose husband is suicidal....
Do you mean pointing out the truth...is that evil?...you know what they say...the truth is a double edged sword...it cuts like a knife.
Lise
I CANNOT control Bill. I agree with Bill's stand on Leah.I do not see Leah as the N saint. I see Leah as a loving person.I can't agree with you on Leah, Lise. I have made that clear, out of my own mouth, to you.However, *I* did NOT ask Bill in any form, shape or way to post.
He is very sure of himself and strong about his opinions. I could NOT force him to post ,even if I wanted to.I am telling the truth. Lise, I love him with a pure love. I am not ashamed of it, at all, even if it appears "bad"
I would like you to remove the posts and I would appreciate it. Ami
Gabben
As someone more on the outside of your posts, than the inside, I sense much anger, paranoia, the need to present yourself as always right, and very very very sensitive to others' posts.
When I read your posts, I feel so sad for you and wish your feeling of self was far better than it is.
sincerely
Izzy :P
Dear Lise
I have to tell you, honestly, I have TRIED to get Bills' wit and incredible intelligence TO intervene in fights,but he would not.
I would never hurt you and he would not ,either.
We ,simply do not see the N Saint in Leah. That is our "crime" against you, Lise. Ami
Honestly, Bill could "take" Lighter with one finger,but he would not get involved. He is his own person, Lise. I am sorry you do not see it. Ami
Honestly, Bill could "take" Lighter with one finger,but he would not get involved. He is his own person, Lise. I am sorry you do not see it. Ami
Honestly, Bill could "take" Lighter with one finger,but he would not get involved. He is his own person, Lise. I am sorry you do not see it. Ami
Excuse me, but the only person who "takes" anyone around here is Dr. Grossman.
Thanks Izzy for your concern.
Your post is a projection of your own self-hatred and anger as well as you can't figure out a way to get my attention so taking a dig at me is the only way you figure that you can get me to respond to you here on the board.
Deep down you wish I would pay more attention to you....sorry for ignoring you Izzy.
Lise
Ami,
What happened is that you saw Carolyn and +(lighter) going a bit against Leah on this thread.
So then, in your fear, that I, because of my friendship with Carolyn and my dislike of Leah's behavior on this board was going to turn to lighter and turn on you, you had Bill step in; I can only assume, but my gut tells me that you asked him to step in to look and defend Leah to support your fears.
In the past I have had conflict with Leah, you, Ami have stayed neutral as well as Bill has never said anything....until now, interesting.
This conflict today was a direct result of your misdirected fear and ambition to win the conflict with lighter, Ami...an attempt to win the situation, nothing less nothing more.
The sad fact is that no one wins....we are still here with our voices.
If you would like me to delete my posts about your relationship to Bill, I will. It was not done out of spite, but to illuminate the truth, as I see it...and I have had much practise now, I feel confident that I do see it clearly. If you both wanted to see it, you could...it is all there---------------the truth.
Lise