Author Topic: Hops  (Read 3011 times)

lighter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8631
Hops
« on: May 11, 2014, 11:47:20 AM »
::Deeply, and profoundly missing Hop's ability, to boil words down with much brevity::

::sigh::

I have so little room to say so much in this legal brief....

which is due in the morning.

Lighter

« Last Edit: May 11, 2014, 11:49:21 AM by lighter »

Hopalong

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13616
Re: Hops
« Reply #1 on: May 11, 2014, 08:41:29 PM »
Alas, wish I could wave a wand and make it easier, Lighter.
Thanks for the kind words but my vaunted editing ability
can really evaporate at times.

I hope just taking a chainsaw to it and not sweating the
smaller points will help.

Tighten, tighten, tighten is my very best advice.
Stick to nouns and verbs that describe actions and
avoid innuendo and nuances.

love
Hops
"That'll do, pig, that'll do."

lighter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8631
Re: Hops
« Reply #2 on: May 11, 2014, 09:03:58 PM »
Alas, wish I could wave a wand and make it easier, Lighter.
Thanks for the kind words but my vaunted editing ability
can really evaporate at times.

I hope just taking a chainsaw to it and not sweating the
smaller points will help.

Tighten, tighten, tighten is my very best advice.
Stick to nouns and verbs that describe actions and
avoid innuendo and nuances.

love
Hops

::saluting, and going for chainsaw::

Lighter

Twoapenny

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3740
  • Becoming
Re: Hops
« Reply #3 on: May 12, 2014, 02:36:58 AM »
Alas, wish I could wave a wand and make it easier, Lighter.
Thanks for the kind words but my vaunted editing ability
can really evaporate at times.

I hope just taking a chainsaw to it and not sweating the
smaller points will help.

Tighten, tighten, tighten is my very best advice.
Stick to nouns and verbs that describe actions and
avoid innuendo and nuances.

love
Hops

::saluting, and going for chainsaw::

Lighter

Good luck, L.  With you all the way :) xx

lighter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8631
Re: Hops
« Reply #4 on: May 17, 2014, 12:15:19 AM »
Well, I fell a tad bit short of perfection, but I'm mighty pleased with the brief, and feeling fine.

I will tell you this.....

opposing counsel isn't going to have much fun tackling his response brief.  Esp if he has other things to work on, and they always do.

The journey continues....

thanks for the kind thoughts.

Light

Hopalong

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13616
Re: Hops
« Reply #5 on: May 19, 2014, 11:59:55 AM »
When I was trying to survive my evil brother's iNsanity, fortunately his accusations were so demonstrably
conspiracy-theory NUTS, that once his rambling "list" of my transgressions (harboring creepy people in
the Family Home, when it was the interim MINISTER and his wife renting the space, and my brother's
homegrown "P.I" (whom I suspect was an unemployed h.s. buddy) sent him license plates...my brother
puffed up and made all these dark innuendoes about people with "false identities" living in the house...
anyway, turned out he had the license number of a very reputable radiologist who lived across the street,
and there WERE no "secrets" about the minister. Duh. My brother wound up looking stupid, irrational, and
(according to my lawyer) delusional.

I responded to and debunked every accusation he made in detail, in writing, and when it came to finances,
I had meticulous records of every single thing I had done in Mom's behalf (and with her blessing). My
very favorite moment, which I'm sure I've mentioned here before--was when the temporary conservator
wrote her report to the judge, and said, "No only is there no evidence going back years, of any misuse
or inappropriate handing of funds whatsoever, but [Hops] has actually gone into personal debt herself
to manage her mother's nursing home costs, and must be repaid when the estate is settled." She did
point out that due to me being not a brilliant accountant I didn't manage it perfectly, and that over
10 years I had paid about $750 in unnecessary fees (late, miscalculated, etc.). But on the other hand,
I'd spent over $20,000 of my own money to pay for Mom's nursing care, leaving myself considerably in
debt."

The evidence of my brother's contribution to his mother's care was--$40. For one hairdo at the nursing
home. And...it turned out that my brother's wife had donated that.

I hope that is my last court experience for the rest of my life (it was my first) -- but the official
affirmation that I was a conscientious and devoted caregiver, and that he was a creep...was sweet.

I hope this is how it winds up for you too, Lighter -- and that you can soon leave it all behind.

Is there any visitation with the grandparents at all? Do you or the girls want there to be?

xo
Hops
"That'll do, pig, that'll do."

lighter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8631
Re: Hops
« Reply #6 on: May 25, 2014, 12:24:28 AM »
Hops:

I'm glad you were validated through your court experience.

I found that what seemed like the worst things, for me, turned out to be the most cathartic things.  Just as you said. 

In court, anyway.

Right now, there is no visitation, and hasn't been for 5 years. 

I'm hoping there never will be, which seems really harsh to write and read, but......

the IL's can't be trusted, and they can't do any better.  I have no illusions about that, and so it is what it is.

My children have had some pretty harsh reality checks.  The youngest couldn't be driven to visit the IL's with a blowtorch after that trial, and my oldest says "visitation is probably a very bad idea." 

I don't think visitation, of any kind, is a remote possibility. 

::knocking wood::

Lighter

Twoapenny

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3740
  • Becoming
Re: Hops
« Reply #7 on: May 25, 2014, 02:47:16 AM »
Hops:

I'm glad you were validated through your court experience.

I found that what seemed like the worst things, for me, turned out to be the most cathartic things.  Just as you said. 

In court, anyway.

Right now, there is no visitation, and hasn't been for 5 years. 

I'm hoping there never will be, which seems really harsh to write and read, but......

the IL's can't be trusted, and they can't do any better.  I have no illusions about that, and so it is what it is.

My children have had some pretty harsh reality checks.  The youngest couldn't be driven to visit the IL's with a blowtorch after that trial, and my oldest says "visitation is probably a very bad idea." 

I don't think visitation, of any kind, is a remote possibility. 

::knocking wood::

Lighter

I'm crossing my fingers for you, Lighter.  Do the courts take the children's views into account?  Given your girls ages, even if a court did award visitation, could it be enforced if the girls refused?  In the Uk I think it would be unlikely once they're old enough to make their own choices.

lighter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8631
Re: Hops
« Reply #8 on: May 25, 2014, 11:38:49 AM »
Yup...... My attorney said the girls would have to go if ordered, but I don't see another trial happening and if it did our Judge hates the Il's and she would likely bring down fire and brimstone on them before giving the any sort of visitation.

The IL's don't meet any standard in the new or old grandparent visitation statutes which makes it impossible to prevail .......at least with a rational Judge on the bench. 

I was worried about visitation during the trial for a number of reasons....unknown factors that have sunce been revealed.  Not worried any longer. 

The thing is...if an appellate judge reverses this order we lose a scathing order against the IL's on record and award of attorney fees.  I don't see the IL going back in front of a judge who sees clearly what and who they are.

Lighter