I found the article is kinda confusing legal and moral justice issues.
Legally: The 2nd Amendment says I have a right to defend myself; that's been qualified and restricted and regulated by every state in the country. But the "right to self-defense" is still a precedent in the judicial system. Perhaps not effectually in that locality, equally for everyone - but corruption/power networks have been around a LONG time. It is true, that poorer women suffer this kind of "justice" decision from the "system", than more upper-class women.
Morally: I also believe I have a right to defend myself, but that's taken a long, long time and many arduous hours to arrive at and it's a PERSONAL choice to believe that. I accept fully that other people make other choices for themselves and that's perfectly fine by me. Like I said, it's PERSONAL. I understand that some will judge me for my choice, but then, they haven't lived through what I have or had to do the work to get A choice, of any kind for themselves, because no one can imagine what that involves until one has actually lived through it.
More than that I'm not willing to discuss. Except to say I truly feel for the woman in the article.
(From the title of the article, I expected this to be about denial, self-sabotage, etc. instead of physically defending oneself. Tells ya where my head's been at lately.)