Author Topic: Releasing Wounded and Wounding Friends & Loved Ones  (Read 12007 times)

dogbit

  • Guest
Releasing Wounded and Wounding Friends & Loved Ones
« Reply #30 on: April 24, 2005, 03:20:07 PM »
Asterisks Syndrome

That is too funny.  I'm going to have to tell my kid.  She has a great sense of humor.  You are on a roll today!  You're not maudlin but hysterical!  What was this thread about anyway and I do not have asterisk syndrome.  Bittles

Stormchild

  • Guest
Releasing Wounded and Wounding Friends & Loved Ones
« Reply #31 on: April 24, 2005, 03:25:41 PM »
Hey bittles!

I keep timing out on my posts and people can still tell it's me because

***********

I use a line of asterisks to separate different topics

***********

and ***also*** for emphasis

and sometimes as a traffic warning:

****CAUTION - ASTERISK ZONE ****

and after being gently teased a bit about this, I got the biggest kick out of seeing someone else use rows of asterisks to separate topics.

thought it was you. No? ***sigh***

vunil as guest

  • Guest
Releasing Wounded and Wounding Friends & Loved Ones
« Reply #32 on: April 24, 2005, 06:20:49 PM »
Quote
"taking care of her needs". Um, that's all she ever did, from what I can tell.


Somewhere along the way it became acceptable to say "need" for "want."  It came around the same time that pop psychology started happening, maybe 15 years ago or so?  Not sure exactly, and heaven knows I have gotten something out of books too, but all of sudden people started saying things like "I really need this from you" and "I am getting my needs met" and "he wasn't acknowledging my needs" when they are talking about the most selfish of impulses.  And somehow that word allows you to demand something-- I mean, if it's a need, who is anyone else to argue?  A particularly funny example I remember is a friend of mine's roommate many years ago told him, when he asked her to please do her dishes because it had been a couple of days (and they were getting yucky), and she said "I really need you not to ask me to do things.  I have issues around being told what to do."  I guess she didn't have issues with him doing her dishes for her...

!   :roll:

mum

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1036
Releasing Wounded and Wounding Friends & Loved Ones
« Reply #33 on: April 24, 2005, 10:34:44 PM »
Vunil: Funny how buzzwords catch on, especially if they let someone off the hook (but those N's will find anything to do that!!!)
In the same vien:s a teacher, we teach kids to communicate with "I" statements (which I do believe work, once they get it).  It makes sense to let a kid who is upset keep his power, even when it's to say" I feel hurt when you call me that name"...it isn't blaming, and done right, I think adults could use it effectively. But the funniest thing I heard was a teacher telling a kid who was mad to "use and I message to tell him how you feel"....So the kid says to the other kid: "I hate you."

vunil as guest

  • Guest
Releasing Wounded and Wounding Friends & Loved Ones
« Reply #34 on: April 25, 2005, 02:48:53 AM »
Mum!   :lol:


You have to sort of admire that kid.  Or maybe that's just me in a sick mood.

Stormchild Guesting

  • Guest
Releasing Wounded and Wounding Friends & Loved Ones
« Reply #35 on: April 25, 2005, 09:48:08 AM »
Problem is, I messages and 'when you-this-i that" messages don't work with abusers.

Sample dialog:

I-statement: "I feel terribly hurt that you would (fly to Rio, get your secretary pregnant, eat our tame pheasant) without talking to me about it first."

Typical response: "Who gives a (your choice of expletive) how YOU feel?"

You-this-I-that statement: "When you physically assaulted our waiter and got us barred from Ruth's Chris Steak House, I was so embarrassed I wanted to cry."

Typical response: " So what?"

There is an implied presupposition in both the I-dialogs and the When-you dialogs that both participants are on a sufficiently equal footing for the pain of one to matter to the other. Just not true with abusers. Trying this stuff with them at home only reveals your current area of vulnerability to them, with nice bright concentric rings painted around it.

Anyone got an alternative for use with abusers, other than large lumps of granite on the noggin (which would always work but might do so irreversibly)?

Look ma no asterisks

 :wink:

Anonymous

  • Guest
Releasing Wounded and Wounding Friends & Loved Ones
« Reply #36 on: April 25, 2005, 09:53:48 AM »
Hi Ya'll:  Stormy, Brigid, Bunny, Mud, Mum, Patz, Vunil, Dogbit, Mia...hope I haven't missed anyone.  Just felt like including each person individually, so you might feel responded to.....because it's that not...feeling responded to.... feeling that really hurts, especially if it's a person you consider your friend ..who is doing the not responding part.  So  to each person who's name is here (and others who are reading), I just want to say that I understand the let down of not being responded to/supported by a supposed friend and the loss that occurs at that moment/those moments.

Stormy wrote:
Quote
wonder if what we are seeing is weakness dressed as kindness? Denial and even moral cowardice dressed as fairness?


On the other hand, we are all weak, unkind, we deny, may even show a little moral cowardice/unfairness sometimes, because we are imperfect.  I don't expect perfection from my friends but I do expect them to hug me when I hurt, at some point.

Quote
Also, I **just** realized there's a large reminder of my parents here. These folks are always complimenting me on how well I deal with things.

Oooooweee. So... if you're competent, we won't support you. We only have kindness and empathy for people who aren't competent, people we can feel "better than" -- or people who are messed up in the same way that we are [rather than being messed up differently, as I (Stormy) am ]?


Yes.  I get that a lot too.  "You're such a strong person, you'll be fine."   Even from therapists!  And the truth is, I am a pretty strong person but I'm not tarzanna/wonder woman.   I need a hug once in awhile too.

Quote
I wonder how much charity is really disguised (and not very well, at that) condescension?


I believe my friend is a good person who does good things.  And she is human and capable of not doing everything perfectly, just like the rest of us.  So I have no problem forgiving her for that.

But I don't understand how she can ignor my calling for help/expressing my emotions/describing the wrongs I felt were specifically directed at me....and still say she cares?  Maybe she does have strong feelings for me?  I don't think she would lie about that, nor say so for any selfish purpose.  She just doesn't get that ignoring my pain is a really wierd way of showing love.   It doesn't indicate caring to me.  The fact that she hasn't even responded to that......gives me no reason to trust that she won't do the same thing again the next time things get tough.

One thing I will risk saying here is something I have always taught my children and that is:

It doesn't seem fair to interfere in other people's relationships.

When my ex and I were divorced.....I told this to my kids.  I understood that they care about their dad and about me.  Even though I have been hurt in many ways by their dad's behaviour, it doesn't seem fair of me to interfere in his relationship with his children and vice versa.   I wanted them to understand that they have a right to love and have a relationship with whom they choose.  I didn't "bad mouth" him.  As Mum said, and others too, some where on this board, they will make their minds up for themselves some day.

I told them that if they are friends with A and B, and A and B have a fight, they don't have to take sides.  They can support both A and B, separately, and remain friends with both.  They can say:  "Gee, I'm sorry that happened.  It's not nice.  I understand that you feel mad, sad, upset etc".
And they can try to understand what both friends are feeling and give thems support.  They don't have to ignor either of their friends and it will hurt the ignored person to do so.

I told them that they don't have to end relationships with one person to prove anything to another.   I hope this makes sense.

Mudpup:  I don't believe in flashing righteous anger at anyone to get my point across, unless I really feel it and can't see any other way to communicate.  But I am honest.  I did explain how I felt, very bluntly (that I don't trust my friend, etc) and it didn't compute, or wasn't accepted.   Her behaviour didn't cause me to feel angry....just hurt.  I don't want to "pay" her back, in any way.   I can't change the way she behaves.  I can only distance myself from her and deal with my feelings of loss.

But thanks for thinking of me, Mudpup and for taking the time to comment.  That in itself feels good and shows your kind interest.

Sorry for all who have experienced this loss of friends/lack of support.

((((((all))))))

GFN

Stormchild Guesting

  • Guest
Releasing Wounded and Wounding Friends & Loved Ones
« Reply #37 on: April 25, 2005, 10:09:50 AM »
Quote from: Anonymous
One thing I will risk saying here is something I have always taught my children and that is:

It doesn't seem fair to interfere in other people's relationships.

I told [my kids] that if they are friends with A and B, and A and B have a fight, they don't have to take sides.  They can support both A and B, separately, and remain friends with both.  I told them that they don't have to end relationships with one person to prove anything to another.   I hope this makes sense.


Sounds good in theory, GFN, but I always end up making practical distinctions.

I would have no hesitation at all over ending a friendship immediately with someone who raped or battered or stole from a mutual acquaintance. In fact, I'd probably be the one getting the victim to hospital and / or the police.

Why should the psychological equivalents of battery, larceny, and rape get a free pass?

If the argument between A and B is fundamental, and if one has truly been wronged or injured by the other, then refusing to support the wronged one merely adds to the wrong being done them. And endorses the wrongdoer, at the same time.

Why do we always have to pretend it takes two? Can't we see where that leads? Do we really think that every little kid murdered by a pedophile was asking for it and got what they deserved? Because that's where this logic takes us, eventually.

And I'm using the most brutal example I can think of on purpose, because there really are people in this world who won't even take sides about them.

On the other hand, I totally agree with you if we're talking about middle-school-type ladies-garden-club spats, but those generally mend themselves eventually anyway.

I guess there are just some situations in which 'being reasonable' is a copout. At least, to me.

Anonymous

  • Guest
Releasing Wounded and Wounding Friends & Loved Ones
« Reply #38 on: April 25, 2005, 11:29:20 AM »
Stormy: got to get back to you on your "problem with I messages" bit>
You are hilarious.  Seriously, that's just about the wittiest thing I have read in ages.  You are sharp!  And that's saying a lot, as I find just about everyone on this board to be pretty darn funny and sharp! (myself excluded....I just ramble).  
Ok, so beyond those hysterical scenarios (eating our tame pheasant!!!!) I agree entirely.  "I" statements/dialogue such as those presume that both parties are not impaired with a personality disorder/terrible interpersonal skills/inability to be honest, or even recognize their own or other's feelings.  You are right on!

mum as guest

  • Guest
Releasing Wounded and Wounding Friends & Loved Ones
« Reply #39 on: April 25, 2005, 11:31:32 AM »
OOPS, that last post was mine
MUM

Anonymous

  • Guest
Releasing Wounded and Wounding Friends & Loved Ones
« Reply #40 on: April 25, 2005, 12:48:22 PM »
Quote from: Stormchild Guesting
I-statement: "I feel terribly hurt that you would (fly to Rio, get your secretary pregnant, eat our tame pheasant) without talking to me about it first."

Typical response: "Who gives a (your choice of expletive) how YOU feel?"

You-this-I-that statement: "When you physically assaulted our waiter and got us barred from Ruth's Chris Steak House, I was so embarrassed I wanted to cry."

Typical response: " So what?"


Choice #1: Avoid people who are this abusive. I see no reason to communicate with them at all. Just get away from them.

Choice #2 If one HAS to talk to someone like this, I would certainly not bring up anything this sensitive. I'd only talk about sports, cars, or whatever this oaf likes to talk about.

Choice #3 To talk to someone who is defensive, hostile, and shame-based, one has to show them a lot of respect and not shame them even more. One has to consider whether it's even worth it, or whether one should end the relationship because it's just too abusive.

bunny

dogbit

  • Guest
Releasing Wounded and Wounding Friends & Loved Ones
« Reply #41 on: April 25, 2005, 12:50:28 PM »
It doesn't seem fair to interfere in other people's relationships.

I don't know if it is fair or not or appropriate or not but by being friends with people, you have to be comfortable with what they have to offer and what you have to offer.  By taking a stance of not interfering, I think you might be withholding your value as a friend.  But then, we have to define interfering.  If A hits B after B has told A she is a jerk and both A and B are friends of yours,do you say I understand why both of you did what you did and I still love both of you?  Since I am not a master of diplomacy and do not care to be one, I would think that your value as a friend is diminished.  The friends I am choosing to remain with at this time in my life with the best knowledge I have are those that give me a reality check that is in sync with my reality and the reality of most normal average people.  I'm picking up on your post because a family that was very influential with me in my early years always turned the other cheek.  Without going into specifics, I think it served them better than others.  But I also learned compassion from them.  Compassion is biblical but too much leaves much confusion.  What is right and wrong?

I  told them that they don't have to end relationships with one person to prove anything to another. I hope this makes sense.
It makes a lot of sense ... By giving your honest feedback and I mean honest....Like this is who I am, this is why I am your friend, and this is what I think of what's going on and I'm telling you because you are my friend, I'm not trying to break off the friendship or take sides or manipulate the outcome.  I am just trying to be your friend and if the friendship does not survive past this point then I am doing the best I can with what I know at the moment.  Giving the other guy a choice to listen to me or not is validating of the other guy, right?  And being able to express your honest opinion is equally validating of who you are.  I think that is friendship.  Sorry if I have missed the point....but this is just where my thoughts went...when friends can't return their share of the investment in a friendship, I think it is time to re-define....maybe like acqaintances??....******bittles*******

Stormchild Guesting

  • Guest
Releasing Wounded and Wounding Friends & Loved Ones
« Reply #42 on: April 25, 2005, 01:26:46 PM »
Quote from: bunny
Choice #1: Avoid people who are this abusive. I see no reason to communicate with them at all. Just get away from them.


Absolutely!

Thing is, this used to be (and sometimes still is) the way I find out they ARE abusive.

What then? Stony silence and an abrupt disappearance sound kinda good to me, but when you have to work with oiks like this, you can't stay in your office (if you have one) all day every day. Sooner or later, if nothing else, you gotta go to Dijon, and guess who you meet in the hall on your way there.

Is it possible to serve notice on these people and then continue to go about your business?

Any suggestions on technique?

Anonymous

  • Guest
Releasing Wounded and Wounding Friends & Loved Ones
« Reply #43 on: April 25, 2005, 01:46:01 PM »
Quote from: Stormchild Guesting
What then? Stony silence and an abrupt disappearance sound kinda good to me, but when you have to work with oiks like this, you can't stay in your office (if you have one) all day every day. Sooner or later, if nothing else, you gotta go to Dijon, and guess who you meet in the hall on your way there.

Is it possible to serve notice on these people and then continue to go about your business?

Any suggestions on technique?


It depends on who the coworker is (boss, equal, etc.), and what the situation is. If you give me something more concrete I could tell you what I would lean toward doing.

bunny

Stormchild Guesting

  • Guest
Releasing Wounded and Wounding Friends & Loved Ones
« Reply #44 on: April 25, 2005, 02:00:23 PM »
bunny, you have a deal  :D . I was hoping there might be some good general response but thought it was probably not likely.

When I get back to the ranch in a coupla weeks, I'll probably have plenty of specific examples. I'll check in with you for suggestions then, if that's OK. I'd love to learn some new coping methods.

thanks bunny!