Author Topic: Contentious: Please explain your verse in a new thread......  (Read 1578 times)

CONTENTIOUS

  • Guest
.... I don't understand it. R.G.)

I DONT KNOW AS IT WAS VERSE :)
BUT THE EXPLANATION BE
THAT MUDPUPPY WHEN HE POSTED IN THE POST BEFORE MINE
NAMELY THIS
I think they're the biggest loser in every situation they're in. Your N father has taken your daughter so you have lost her, temporarily. But he will never know what its like to be loved by his kids. He'll never know what its like to love his kids. Behind his facade he is a tormented, lonely, pathetic, loser who decades ago lost the only things that matter, and he'll never get them back.
And as a Christian I also believe his losing has not really even begun yet. Nor does he have any idea just how much he lost when he started down the path of living as an emotional parasite.

I hope I don't sound contentious, just trying to put their 'winning' in perspective.

mudpup
WHERE HE ENDED WITH SAYING THAT HE HOPED NOT TO SOUND
CONTENTIOUS WHEN SAYING THAT THERE WAS NO HOPE
FOR SUCH A PERSON TO CHANGE TO WHERE HE COULD WIN
LOVE BACK WHERE I THINK A CHRISTIAN UNDERSTANDING IS THAT
SUCH CHANGE IS POSSIBLE SO THO IT MIGHT SEEM UNSEEMLY
CONTENTIOUS TO POINT SUCH OUT ...
THAT JESUS OFTEN DID THINGS THAT SEEMED UNDULY
CONTENTIOUS THO NOT OF A SIMILAR VEIN
YET STILL IN THE VEIN OF GOING AGAINST WHAT
SOME PRESUMED THE PROPER SPIRITUAL RESPONSE
..ONE OF WHICH IS WHEN HE DROVE OUT THE MONEY CHANGERS..
AND THE PARALLEL HERE THO WOULD BE TO DRIVE OUT
WHO LAY THEIR MOTIVES TO THAT WHICH IS CHRISTIAN
BUT IS PERHAPS QUESTIONABLE ...
MIGHT THAT SUFFICE FOR NOW :)

WELL TOO HOW MUDPUPPY CLAIMED
SOME THING ABOUT LOVE AND CHRISTIANITY
IN ANOTHER THREAD FROM C S LEWIS
AND WHAT HE SAID IN THIS THREAD
CERTAINLY DIDNT APPEAR CONSISTENT WITH IT

Dr. Richard Grossman

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 858
    • http://www.voicelessness.com
Contentious: Please explain your verse in a new thread......
« Reply #1 on: June 04, 2005, 03:19:34 PM »
O.K., I understand (the concreteness helps!)

Thanks,

Richard Grossman

CONTENTIOUS

  • Guest
(the concreteness help] but at the cost of ...
« Reply #2 on: June 04, 2005, 03:26:01 PM »
... poetic license etc :) oh my
i guess i can survive without poetic license ...

mudpuppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1276
Contentious: Please explain your verse in a new thread......
« Reply #3 on: June 04, 2005, 03:51:49 PM »
Hi Contentious,

Let me first apologize for going off on you yesterday. You pushed a couple of buttons of mine. Forgive me for calling you names.

And let me add that you are correct that Ns can be changed if God so chooses. It would have been better had I said it is unlikely that an N will change and that the vast majority do not. I believe that is fairly well accepted fact concerning people with NPD, is it not?
So you are correct, I should not have generalized that all Ns are doomed to the eternal consequences of their disorder. I do however believe unequivocally the vast majority are, just as the vast majority of rich young rulers are.

I am unable to understand what is inconsistent in CS Lewis's definition of love and my description of Ns in the referenced post. I do not find joy in the eternal fate of Ns, only sorrow. Nor do I hate them. I love them in precisely the way Lewis described, and that is perfectly consistent with what I said in my post. Christian love does not require us to pretend black is white does it?
Perhaps if you had asked me to explain myself rather than taking it upon yourself to 'drive out' someone from this board who you did not feel had sufficiently Christian motives we could have had a productive conversation.
I hope you will accept my apology for my part in the unfortunate incident yesterday.

mudpuppy

contentious

  • Guest
Contentious: Please explain your verse in a new thread......
« Reply #4 on: June 04, 2005, 04:00:07 PM »
from last post here of mudpuppy...
I am unable to understand what is inconsistent in CS Lewis's definition of love and my description of Ns in the referenced post.

i am not so sure what referenced post in particular is being references
..if it be the thread that was deleted ... i am not so sure you
could reference it ... but i with my total recall under self hypnosis
will see what i can do :)

to some degree i am suspicious
of some types of offers of apologies
tho the offerer might feel sincere
i often wonder if it is part of a tactic
and oh oh so confusing what to do
under such circumstances
esp if it is someone whose buttons
might be easily pushed... :(

perhaps upon a thread far far away
yet nigh at hand such issues
of such possible tactics might be discussed

Dr. Richard Grossman

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 858
    • http://www.voicelessness.com
Contentious: Please explain your verse in a new thread......
« Reply #5 on: June 04, 2005, 06:08:26 PM »
O.K., I'm locking this thread because everything that can be said, I think, has been said.

Richard Grossman