Voicelessness and Emotional Survival > Voicelessness and Emotional Survival Message Board

Shyness and Social Anxiety--Diane Rehm Show

(1/2) > >>

Dr. Richard Grossman:
Hi everybody,

Here's a Diane Rehm Show (NPR) on shyness and social anxiety:

http://thedianerehmshow.org/shows/2011-08-09/shyness-and-social-anxiety

Also, Susan Cain, one of the participants, wrote a New York Times Op-Ed (6/25/2011) entitled "Is Shyness an Evolutionary Tactic?":

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/26/opinion/sunday/26shyness.html?_r=4&emc=eta1

Most interesting to me are the "upside" correlates of the "shy brain", e.g. sensitivity and empathy to/with others...

Comments?  (Don't be shy...)

Richard

Hopalong:
Hi Richard,

I'm not shy, socially, quite the opposite...but I am a caretaker so I didn't want to leave your thread unresponded to.  :wink:

I do have a lot of empathy, used to be nearly a crippling amount.

So being an extrovert, and gregarious, doesn't necessarily mean less empathetic, imo.

I was thinking about how my heart always instantly melted when I met a man who was wounded. I have been involved with alcoholics, married someone partly paralysed with a broken back, a cancer survivor...

What is odd that all but one were also Ns. So I think the combo of N-plus-tragedy is the bouquet of red flags I know now I must refuse. (Not that I won't keep caring about people's suffering, but that I believe I must no longer sign up to dedicate my life to holding someone else up. I want reciprocal support, reciprocal caring, and reciprocal responsibility...)

Which all means I've sort of diverted your thread to a discussion about codependency, probably. Sorry. I'll yak about that elsewhere.

Shyness. Other words...intraversion? I guess shyness is intraversion + pain? Because just being a quiet type or mellow or contemplative sort doesn't have to make one uncomfortable or unhappy.

So I guess shyness might be intraversion plus fear? If the fear can be dealt with, a quiet person can be quite happy?

Hops

Meh:
Eleanor Roosevelt, King George, Emily Dickinson....we always have to point out our high status symbol exceptions


So if someone does experience social rejections that is not a trait that is the human animal experience.

Watched a grouping of about 7 teenage girls eatting breakfast on some school outing type event. One girl with a handicapped leg sat by herself at one table while the rest of the other teenage girls crowed around another little table away from her. One of them seemed to suggest that they should invite the handicapped girl to their table but they all just looked over in a wary sort of way and never did.

That sort of thing is not really a trait it's a social event that repeats itself daily. Unless her parents goad her into some special Olympics type environment which is an artificial social event.

It's easy to see what her problem is but other people with emotional issues are harder to spot and then maybe they get called shy as well even though maybe they shouldn't be lumped into the shy category the emotional issue person and the crippled person are not exhibiting traits they are responding to a social interaction. ?
 

Hopalong:
Hear, hear.

Sitting stunned by human cruelty isn't ... shy.

It's alive.

Thanks, Guest.

Meh:
I found myself being contrary in general to the dialogue because it's become a bad habit of mine I guess because of being on the receiving end of contrariness and also just being angry and pissed off in general so my first reaction to the discussion was

"that wasn't helpful"

But then today as I was walking down the street thinking about a frustrating conversation topic I have had going on made me realize that just because some conversations between two people seem to repeat and repeat...well not all conversations have to be that way. The type of dialogue that happens when people are exploring a topic like shyness even though some of it is predictable it is an exploration conversation style...where other conversation styles get rutted.

So it wasn't so much the subject matter that was helpful to me, rather it was the way people were verbally bouncing around in an exploratory type of way that felt like an opening rather then the closing-in I experience in coversations that go back and forth the same way every time. "Do this"...." No I don't want to do that there must be another option....
"Do this"....no I don't want to do that

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page