Along comes someone who is basically saying it's wrong to label N's as N's.
I'm wondering if you've interpreted what T is saying correctly?
I read T pointing out some of the disadvantages of labelling.. in that it sort of confines our perspective of the person to a simple set of behaviours/traits (N behaviours/traits if we label the person N) and that we may think of ourselves more as victims, sometimes, by only seeing the villan.
I read that it is a choice to label or not to and that T found it helpful not to.
I didn't read that it's wrong to label, as T has written.
I did write that it is wrong to label unfairly and especially without adequate information (and to be honest, I think we all do it sometimes. We judge quickly...sometimes correctly, sometimes...not).
If it is important to you to apply a label, for whatever reason(s), it is your choice. If you see an advantage to understanding behaviour/traits without necessarily labelling the whole person, then that is another way of looking at it. Which is right or wrong?
GFN