This board has helped explain a lot of things that before were only a mystery to me. I've realized recently that someone I've known for almost 30 years is a 1st degree N (is there such a thing as a degree of N??), which explains his behavior in a way that finally makes sense. What makes him such a good study is that he has no guile (not to his credit, he just never learned the game!) and so he is totally 'out there' in all his outrageous glory that he demonstrates the essence of what an N is all about. Basically, an N is a three year old who believes winning is a matter of life and death. I've played volleyball with this guy for years. He's close to 70, in very good shape (better than most 40 year olds), an avid hike leader, skier, an ex-Marine, a complete control freak (unfortunately he's been the leader of this activity for many years, (this is within a much larger group) and the only reason his behavior is tolerated as much as it is), a cursing rage-aholic, fault-finding, highly critical of everyone except himself, etc etc.... you all know the drill.
So basically he is a huge raging baby when things don't go the way he wants them to. (I believe this is the very essence of an N, whether they are open with the rage or not. Some don't get mad, they get even). What he reveals so graphically is how his entire sense of self-esteem is TOTALLY dependent on winning, on prevailing, on being first. It's really every bit as essential as oxygen to him. Like losing, being second not first, is death itself. Imagine that 2-3 year old having a temper tantrum when things don't go his way. No difference. It's the END OF WORLD to be on a losing team.
We roll our eyes, we laugh at him, we tell him to knock it off, we tell him it's only a game, we lecture him about swearing in public, but he has no shame whatsoever about his childish behavior. He also has utterly no scruples about HOW he wins. When he serves he picks on the weakest player until we ORDER him to stop. (This is social, not competitive volleyball). One time I had a back injury which he knew about I and couldn't bend over very far. He shamelessly exploited my injury the entire game and felt GOOD about it! Just like a 3 year old would. Completely amoral, no sense of right and wrong. And here's the thing--it was truly nothing personal (he is NOT a malicious person, however much of a jerk he is) and he saw nothing pathetic about winning by exploiting a cripple in order to keep his self-esteem remained intact. So when I try to make sense of an N I think of a very insecure 3 year old who is totally DRIVEN to win at any cost. Winning is really not optional for an N, it's compulsive, a matter of psychological survival. No thanks!! Makes me feel lucky I only have the problems I have.
What brought this to mind was Ami's conversation with her M where her M seemed to capitulate. In my thinking, it was only a strategic retreat because N's are constitutionally incapable of admitting defeat, ever. But Ami's strong stand was the only reason for any retreat at all. I was furious with E (I'll call him) and I paid him back by picking on him with MY serve and making him boil with humiliation as he missed them one after another. I felt a little sadistic but he got the message and he never serves to me anymore. The funny thing, when there is nothing at stake (to him) he is a very personable, likable guy. But can you imagine living with him? I would shoot myself first.
Bill