Author Topic: Ns, Bs and Xs the circular dynamic  (Read 7486 times)

river

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 260
Ns, Bs and Xs the circular dynamic
« on: August 22, 2011, 07:37:04 PM »
Very long post!!   (prize for those who reach the end...!). 

I've been wanting to share about this, its what Ive come to understand... the thread by NLS, and the coversations arising made me feel able to start it.  I want to try to share what I see and make it understandable, even useful, so responses, feedback, all apprecaited. 

Continuing from what Hops said, .............
To me tho, its not about women, its about a principle, and I see this principle resurrected in any culture or social/ ethnic/ gender group.  It happens that as sexuality becomes a commodity, woment become a commodity too.  Using people as disposable commodities is basically an N principle.  I was brought up with 'guilt' for my mum.  Only late into my adulthood I realised that what she wanted from me was nothing to do with me.  I was disposable if I was in the way of something she wanted better.  Yet she wasnt a BAD N like some people have survived here.
 It was the hidden agenda about which I was inconsolable and that had got inside me.   And I think I split that part off to protect the rest of me.  I tried to explode it out of me via my sexuality, and tried to fix or cure it by wanting to resolve the damage inside my 'other', my compulsive love addiciton to an N., feeling for, and could see his inner damage, and thought we could heal together, but I ommitted to check this out with him, (minor oversite!). 
 That split off part of me that ~ in fantasy~ went along with all the worst of it, expressed the most absurd extremes of behaviour in fantasy,  whilst in reality I had an ethical, deeply humanistic ethos.  A split, a split off part of me, that I believe was an attempt to keep my soul safe from the N principles that had got inside me.   
Throughout my adult life I iether acted out or searched for understanding and healing.  I believe that my acting out with compulsive, destruciver relationships was not a 'defence' as some psychology would have it, but an attempt to exorcise what shouldn't have got inside me in the first place. 
Finally, when I read first Vaknin, then Masterson, I had the full understanding. 

  There was so much denial about my mother's Nism, she was  what Masterson calls a 'closet' N.  Its all about her, but she's more victim than grandiose, and so everyone is bent out of shape with guilt, and particulary me. Shame became a central issue for me, and I struggle with that today.

  When I was teenage and the need to separate and be my own person hit, it hit with fierce disgust towards my mother, and I went into exile, lived in a dreamworld, and that then was my schizoid position, at a distance and unable to properly connect with reality.  Ran away from school, into exile, aloneness and confusion.   And when I fell in love it was impossible, my self esteem was so low. 
  Eventually falling in love with an N that was the other half of the schizoid split, the slave/master relationship and brought me to my first rock bottome and into  recovery. 
For me the ourtrageous N was somenow a big attraction, the naughty boy N who challenged the status quo, anything, that, in my unconscous felt like it would challenge my mothers draining deadening grip, and something outrageous, dysfunctional and VISIBLE unlike my mother's which was hidden.   
 So that is how, when I read about the disorders of the self, because this had been with me persistently thro my life, and I'd searched high and low to cure myself, so I discovered thats IT!   I've got a personitly disorder.    Yes, I could see how much the N mother was at the root of it, however, I considered it mine now, to cure.   (And oh boy, seeking the cure was another thing altogether, so few professionals understand)   But in the process, I read and read, and came to see the the whole DYNAMIC    in that it wasnt just about Ns and their victims, but there was a triad that kept the whole thing circulating, between the Ns the Borderlines and the Schizoids.  (Which I call Ns Bs and Xs to get away from the pathologising scientificising of it).......
For example, my father she blamed for everything, projected all her unhappyness onto him as the cause,  and alientaed us against him, he was in the exile part of the split.  Then one sister was the Borderline, she never broke away from my mother,  was devoted to her, she was seen as the one that needed protecting and looking after, (reward/ relationship on the basis of regression, victim/ dramas), for example my mother took over for her and wrote out her university work for her, (where  ~ I would rather have died than that happen)      And my othe sister was primed to hold the self esteem of the whole famliy, the first born, and indeed,  grew up to be charming, and clever, a high achiever, and organises the world around her, by her own admission, is like mother, doesnt mind who she steps on to get her way, yes, she became the n.  Yet my family are basically decent, not extreme by normal standards, yet I see these patterns continue, mosty out of sight, so it seemed that I was the extreme one, used to feel totally alienated in family gatherings, in exile, now handle it better - usually.   

And I see these patterns everywhere I go.    I see the dynamics everywhere..    Everywhere that humans comply with the prevailing ethos in a group, fail to think for themselves, giving up the search for honesty and truth, instead they feel mostly comfortable because they havent really had to separate, they belong. 
I spend so much time alone with the way I see things, and have for long wanted to try to share some of it.   
I dont know where this post will lead, but here goes....
 :P prize to follow if you got here....   

Guest

  • Guest
Re: Ns, Bs and Xs the circular dynamic
« Reply #1 on: August 22, 2011, 07:55:35 PM »
keep going River, I don't think you've won the prize for longest post yet :D

Quote
Everywhere that humans comply with the prevailing ethos in a group, fail to think for themselves, giving up the search for honesty and truth, instead they feel mostly comfortable because they havent really had to separate, they belong. 

I mostly agree, but am not sure how many people ever search for honesty and truth. I mean, I just don't know. I don't have the data. And maybe they all think for themselves, but don't tell anyone else? But based purely on observation of human interactions, I reckon that the majority of people don't try and think too deeply about anything that may rock their own boat, so to speak. What's the incentive? I also guess many are surviving. But I don't know.

river

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 260
Re: Ns, Bs and Xs the circular dynamic
« Reply #2 on: August 23, 2011, 05:53:05 AM »
I think, yes, thats what Im saying, dont have the incentive as you say.   Follow the prevailing culture, like eg phone hacking, they did it because the others did it, and didnt stop when it came to dead solidier's phones or a young girl who had been murdered.   They had swallowed the ethos and culture of Rebecca Brooks (N type), for example.  Similar kinds of principles for family dynamics. 

Guest

  • Guest
Re: Ns, Bs and Xs the circular dynamic
« Reply #3 on: August 23, 2011, 12:26:02 PM »
Or it was simply a case of the Nuremberg Defense? Our brains do what they do always for good reasons.

I guess the incentive is when the dissonance simply gets too painful to withstand and the brain tells 'you' that it is time to change to protect the organism.

teartracks

  • Guest
Re: Ns, Bs and Xs the circular dynamic
« Reply #4 on: August 23, 2011, 04:09:23 PM »



River,

I'm following your thread.  I think there's some good teaching in it for me.

Thanks,
tt



river

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 260
Re: Ns, Bs and Xs the circular dynamic
« Reply #5 on: August 23, 2011, 05:47:51 PM »
Thanks tt, its kind of a step off the edge for me, didnt know how/ if people would respond. 

r.

river

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 260
Re: Ns, Bs and Xs the circular dynamic
« Reply #6 on: August 23, 2011, 06:07:12 PM »
Or it was simply a case of the Nuremberg Defense? Our brains do what they do always for good reasons.

I guess the incentive is when the dissonance simply gets too painful to withstand and the brain tells 'you' that it is time to change to protect the organism.
That would be the reductionist model which implies that people are motivated only by comfort/ discomfort, and personal survival.    But theres other aspects to human nature, such as the natural desire for meaning, values, and moral goodness, I believe innate in all, but badly squashed, and de-railed and forgotten about in many. 

 In fact, I have seen that crises, addiction, etc, can bring people to that place of discomfort and pain where they have to find meaning.   

Guest

  • Guest
Re: Ns, Bs and Xs the circular dynamic
« Reply #7 on: August 23, 2011, 06:41:36 PM »
Quote
That would be the reductionist model

I didn't know that. I was just thinking aloud. So what I thought back there has a label? Interesting! Well well. Well I never. You live and learn eh? :D

river

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 260
Re: Ns, Bs and Xs the circular dynamic
« Reply #8 on: August 23, 2011, 07:05:41 PM »
.....bin living in a bubble with my books for so long  : o    !

Guest

  • Guest
Re: Ns, Bs and Xs the circular dynamic
« Reply #9 on: August 23, 2011, 08:17:28 PM »
Okay River. I'm prolly not up to academic discussions right now.

teartracks

  • Guest
Re: Ns, Bs and Xs the circular dynamic
« Reply #10 on: August 23, 2011, 10:25:34 PM »




river,

I'm a huge fan of reductionism (my version).  I had no idea there was a Reductionism Model.  Makes sense though and I'm going to check it out and see how I've been doing (or not) all these years.   :D

tt





sKePTiKal

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5440
Re: Ns, Bs and Xs the circular dynamic
« Reply #11 on: August 24, 2011, 08:37:58 AM »
Another way to say "reductionist", is how I call it: simple, simplified.

A good bit of what I've been posting here for so many years - a parallel story of "what happened" to me, to River's "what happened" - has been a constant retelling, always trying to find the right words to just say it simply. Our inner children need that simplicity and directness to really understand and let go... and feelings, I find, have a simple direct language most of the time, too.

I guess that's one reason I'm a heavy user of metaphor and allegory. If I can find a way to "illustrate" something simply and relate it to a complex process (which is truly what River's talking about)... it is easier to grasp meaning out of it, for me. Well, that and I grew up loving fairy tales, sagas, and stories. There is another reason, though:

Living with a wacked parent, one lives and breathes all that complexity and it becomes "normal". One starts to expect it elsewhere, with other people, in all things... and well, it uses a lot of energy to constantly experience this kind of constant "translation". And if it feels like one's very survival depends on being able to translate the complexity... there just isn't much time to do anything else as a person! Like figure out what to be when one grows up; who one really is for one's self; what one likes/dislikes... or wants from life... or even create one's own identity, personality: ego.

To be a normal human, one needs to have an ego (in the Freudian sense; not in the Nsense) - a collection of characteristics and attributes that IS the person. But, when one isn't allowed boundaries of SELF growing up... one does NOT develop a very solid ego (that requires nurturing; weeding; and boundaries); it's more fluid - too fluid, in that it's not a cohesive, unified whole - and it can disperse with very little stimulus and become a bunch of disaggregate droplets... until it all pools back together again. In chemistry, there are some fluids, that when combined and under some circumstances, will create "precipitates" - solids are formed from this combination of liquids. But not even those become stable solids... and can transform continuously.

At any point in one's life (even as a grandma) one can still develop and create that unified whole ego. The potential was always there; just not nourished and tended at the normal time. Finding the motivation takes a while. Then locating the path... and learning what the journey requires and being willing to endure the journey's difficulties and setbacks... on the way to what was SUPPOSED to be, in the first place.

I think we're all telling "stories" to our SELVES. Explaining "us" to selves that weren't allowed to breathe, explore, lick raindrops out of the sky and swing and run and just be US... and know we're loved.  Those parts of ourselves need to hear the explanations in certain language (we're all different) that we can understand - and that "makes it all better".
Success is never final, failure is never fatal.