I agree Bunny, using the word “healed” does seem wrong. But hey we’re just chatting here! let’s explore the subject and some of the grey areas? The article linked to above does suggest that diagnosing the severe NPD isn’t that easy and that some people diagnosed do change some of their behaviours due to environmental factors. Not that they are healed, but that they change sufficiently to cope with life and other people (and other people can tolerate them). But not in all cases. Which raises the question just how do you diagnose severe NPD for which there is no hope?
Anyway, as an aside I had fun reading Psychiatric Times. Thank you Guest for the link - it’s a new favourite!
...
http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/p030472.html - Dump the DSM! By Paul Genova, M.D.
Some excerpts:
“recent studies suggest that there is considerable overlap in the genetic vulnerability for schizophrenia and for bipolar disorders.
What is the point of false precision when the genes themselves are imprecise?”
“The personality disorders section, categorical as it is, has been very effective in stifling nascent psychodynamic thinking among our trainees. Many of these "disorders" are extreme forms of various dimensions of normal personality.”
“The focus of psychiatric treatment should be
a single diagnosis--a single person--in most cases,”
There is also a ‘counterpoint’ reply in defence of the DSM. Talk about ruffled feathers! Have you noticed how when people get annoyed they use over-long obscure words, as if the words justify their annoyance? Very funny. Some excerpts:
“Of course, there are many clinically important aspects of the patient that are not captured by this
label, including the psychosocial context in which the depression developed, psychodynamic factors that might be perpetuating the depression and many others. We believe that most mental health care professionals can appreciate this main limitation of the DSM system, namely, that the DSM
diagnosis provides only a part of the story.”
“We are the first to acknowledge that the DSM categories do not always jibe with the ever-evolving body of scientific research and that they sometimes conflict with clinical reality.”
(‘
Conflict with clinical reality?’ So in other words, the DSM categories are sometimes wrong! Just like lawyers, these people should use Plain English more.)
http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/p010664.htmlSome dilemmas of practising psychiatry by Paul Genova. This man writes in an accessible way and he just makes such sense to me. You get a real feeling that he loves his job, he loves people.
http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/p010646.htmlClick above for an example of a shrink I wouldn’t want. What’s your diagnosis?
She refers to her career decisions as “I yielded to the siren's song seducing me” and “the big lights of Hollywood had beckoned, and I found myself on the path” (so she’s not responsible for her actions?) but: “It didn't take long for me to realize” and “a ‘media psychiatrist,’ a title I coined” (she is clever though!)
The best bit is: “It does not seem ‘psychiatrist-like’ to be in the spotlight. And you risk being labeled as having a narcissistic or histrionic personality disorder”.

Heal thyself?