Author Topic: Thought process in an N?  (Read 6931 times)

Sally

  • Guest
Re: Thought process in an N?
« Reply #15 on: May 27, 2007, 10:29:14 AM »
But leaving with out a mother is hell, and l with her is hell. Your mother gave you birth. Your mother fed you, provided roof for you, clothing. How can you leave her, she is your mother, your family, a husband is a stranger that you invite in to your home. Your mother is not a stranger. is your mother.

Dear Lupita,

I have been working on the issue of having N parents for about 2 years.  I have had to face the "truth", acknowledge my denial and change the way I think, change the way I was raised to see the world.

I quoted you because I would like you to look at your assumptions.  Please excuse me if I sound mean, but YOU are putting YOURSELF in "hell", but you do not have to do so.  It is YOUR CHOICE  as to whether you want to view the situation as being in "hell". 

You could CHOOSE to view the situation as your mother is an imperfect person (as we all are) and she will not change.  Let go you YOUR DESIRE that your mother change.

I had to change my thinking and let go of a lot of my desires that people change and I worked a lot of this out in therapy.  With a loving heart, I wouldlike to suggest that you find a good therapist to help you REALLY LOOK at yout thinking patterns and assumptions.  It could make you feel a lot happier and no longer desire things which can never be.

love,
Sally

MICHAEL

  • Guest
Re: Thought process in an N?
« Reply #16 on: May 27, 2007, 10:29:57 AM »
Also, you can always leave your husband, but how to leave your mother?
You were not born with your husband. you can live with out him. But leaving with out a mother is hell, and l with her is hell. Your mother gave you birth. Your mother fed you, provided roof for you, clothing. How can you leave her, she is your mother, your family, a husband is a stranger that you invite in to your home. Your mother is not a stranger. is your mother.
She is your mother!!!!! For Christ!!!!! She is your mother!!!!!!!!!!!!
PROBABLY A BETTER PERSON TO ASK
is your father in heaven...
and in a sense when your heart is cleansed you have discernment
how to emotionally detach from some things
.. best way to do that is pms
no not that pms :P
but prayer meditation and service...

sounds to me like your concern is that how do you get over the hurt
when it was your own mother
and how does one explain such spiritually..
in part my way involves reincarnation and that it is compatible with the bible
now tho consuliting the urim of thummim on the priest's breastplate..
oops now where did i put my breastplate..
guess coins and the i ching will have to do  ..sigh

and the throw of coins suggest some insights about your concern along these lines..
line 1 of hexagram inner trust
Line 1:
Anticipation brings good fortune.
There is elsewhere no comfort.

Things will go well by anticipating things. One needs to be aware of what is going to happen, and prepare for it. Over-preparing or not preparing at all will not help to make one confident and comfortable.

FROM ANOTHER SOURCE ON THAT SAME LINE...
when the truth which lies within is working as it should, it might do more learning than teaching and have more questions than answers.  what one believes often says more about what one feels one needs or wants than the real truth of the matter. sometimes to learn what you need what will help is to look with a simpler mind at the negative issue that is a concern to better discern its paritular workings in  your particular situation.  some knowledge that presumes more for it that it has to give has a down side , namely too much presumption and prejudice ... what might be key is unlearning some knowledge that is more presumption and prejudice than what one wants to face....
LINE ONE IN HEXAGRAMS IS OFTEN SEEN AS A KIND OF KARMIC BACKDROP TO THE CONCERN..
the i ching suggests that if the understanding it gives is applied a new situation that can develop
when line one changes polarities and forms a new hexagram..[a six line figure of lines being active or receptive.which gives a total of 64 hexagrams]
THE NEW HEXAGRAM IN THIS CASE IS 59 WHICH IN TRANSLATION IS CALLED SCATTERING...
..having come to a new understanding one can now move on faith that is more free of false presumption and prejudice
and by faith transcend the former limitations and negativity and one can begin one's return to the full light of understanding that all souls are capable of.
the same line of the new hexagram that was the changing line of the first hexagram also often adds some insights
so line 1 of the new hexagram speaks of
if one reaches this new faith there is yet a need of caution in this new found understanding
one might again become too presumptious with this new knowledge and tis best to be mindful
that one is yet might be a babe in this new faith
and presume a maturity beyiond where they have come...
so remain cautious of remaining hidden prejudices and presumptions that could come to taint the higher insights

Stormchild

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1183
  • It's about becoming real.
    • Gale Warnings
Re: Thought process in an N?
« Reply #17 on: May 27, 2007, 10:31:06 AM »
Lupita, parents murder their children, literally, every day. It happens often enough that we have names for it, and laws about it, and requirements for teachers and physicians to report any signs that a child is in danger of it, along with standardized mandatory minimum punishments for it.

I'm talking physical murder. Shaking babies until they have concussions and die. Battering children until they die from their injuries. Neglecting and starving them until they die from infections and malnutrition.

To take the position that these children have to stay with their parents because 'they're the child's parents' is to advocate total insanity, not to mention evil.

What difference does it make, in the final analysis, whether the murder being committed is of the body or of the soul, of the heart, of the mind?

One difference only. Society doesn't recognize the second type of murder, doesn't really care about abuse at any level short of physical, and in fact is so deeply invested in denial about abuse at all levels that people will refuse to recognize when a child is in danger of being literally killed, until they're so badly harmed that the situation can no longer be ignored. Often this isn't the case until the child is finally dead.

Society won't do a thing to rescue the child. Society is only interested in taking vengeance upon the parent after the child has been destroyed, not in preventing the destruction in the first place, not at any level.

If you are that child, if you were that child, it's important to understand that societal expectations will be just as strong a set of cage bars as any entrapment your parent puts in your way by brainwashing you into thinking that they can do whatever they want to you, mistreat you as obscenely as they like, and you have to put up with it, and even offer yourself up for more of it, merely because they happen to have been your biological parent.

It's up to you to walk out of that cage. Society isn't going to do one blessed thing to help you.

Once you survive to adulthood, you can do it. It isn't easy, but it becomes possible.
The only way out is through, and the only way to win is not to play.

"... truth is all I can stand to live with." -- Moonlight52

http://galewarnings.blogspot.com

http://strangemercy.blogspot.com

http://potemkinsoffice.blogspot.com

michael

  • Guest
Re: Thought process in an N?
« Reply #18 on: May 27, 2007, 10:37:49 AM »
lupita,
in another thread there is a link to a site that is specifically about
daughthers of narcissistic mothers that you might find helpful
if u havent come across it yet
http://www.nevergoodenough.com/

also have u looked on the recent thread here
BETRAYAL..
WHERE I SAID I THINK THE WORSE BETRAYAL IS BY THAT OF A MOTHER

lup

  • Guest
Re: Thought process in an N?
« Reply #19 on: May 27, 2007, 12:33:08 PM »
Thanks Mike. I am the one that put that thread.

finding peace

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 489
Re: Thought process in an N?
« Reply #20 on: May 27, 2007, 12:44:48 PM »
Hi Lupita,

I am going to jump in here – I hope that that is OK. 

You asked

Quote
They do not know the damage they do. Would we punish a blind man for stepping on our toes? Would we punish a deaf person for not answering a question?

If he steps on your toes once or twice, I would have to say no you do not punish the man who cannot see.  If, after advising him where your toes are, he continues to step on them, then I think you have every right to remove your toes from where he has access to them.  Do you punish him, not necessarily – you just protect your toes.

I think Jeffery Dahmer had a mental illness, he was aware of the damage he did, but could not stop himself.  I don’t think that his mental illness gave him the right to keep torturing and eating people and I would punish him for his action (not to mention that if I was aware of what he was, I would make sure I was never in his vicinity). 

Are N parents as bad a Jeffery Dahmer?  Not necessarily.  Are their actions worse than someone who cannot see stepping on your toes?  Most likely.

I sort of equate narcissists to knife wielding people who are eyesight and hearing impaired combined.  Just because they cannot see or hear, are you required to stay in their presence and risk being stabbed?  No.  If you choose to stay in their presence because you cannot bring yourself to leave them in the face of their impairment, then you are well within your rights to get some body armor to protect yourself from the knife.  In other words, it is ok to mentally divorce from them if it is important, right now, not to physically divorce them.

Does this make any sense? 

I went NC last year.  No matter how many times I asked her to stop stepping on my toes and to stop stabbing me with that knife – she couldn’t/wouldn’t do it.  For whatever reason, she doesn’t have it in her.  I could accept (not respect – thank you Hops) that, and continue to have her in my life if she would have stopped treating me badly.  She couldn’t.  It was at the point where I finally realized how much damage she was doing.  My toes were permanently flat, and it was impairing my ability to walk through life, take care of myself, and take care of my family. 

I still struggle with it sometimes, but ultimately I did not leave my mother.  I never really had a mother.  I had a needy incubator.  Yes, I was provided with food, clothes, and a roof over my head, but I was never given necessary tools to be a whole and functioning adult.  Instead of living a happy, fulfilling life, a struggle with a lot anxiety, PTSD, poor self-image. …..

You have a son.  What would you tell him if instead of having you (a wonderful mother), he had your mother as a mother?  Would you tell him he is obligated to stay with her? 

The societal taboo of leaving a mother is a very difficult one to deal with.  I sometimes wonder if we are the forerunners of a change in society.  When I was a child, child abuse wasn’t a household word (and I am taking about physical/sexual abuse).  It wasn’t until the late 70’s/early 80’s (I think), where the overt types of child abuse became common knowledge.  I think this evolution is still occurring – and now it is moving towards the more silent types of abuse – emotional abuse and neglect (in my opinion - some of the worst types of abuse).  Right now, it seems to me that general society is still in the dark ages regarding this type of abuse. 

Do you remember when it was taboo to divorce?  Women who divorced their husbands were shunned by society.  Instead of having a name - they became "that divorced woman."  Because of societal norms, they thought that they did not have a choice, and stayed in toxic relationships because society dictated this.  Child emotional abuse and neglect is a recognized syndrome, but I think that society in general does not realize how pervasive it is – and how damaging.  Right now, in this time and place, it is considered taboo to leave your mother.  Sometimes I think of myself as that “divorced child.”  Maybe 20 or 30 years down the road, as the ramifications of childhood emotional abuse and neglect become more well known, societal norms will catch up with us, and divorcing a parent will be accepted – just as divorcing a spouse is now accepted.  I am hoping that through sites like these, awareness will increase, and instead of it being taboo to divorce a parent, it will be taboo to emotionally abuse and neglect a child.  Maybe then the cycle of abuse will truly stop.

It is very hard.  I was in your situation last year.  I understand completely where you are – my mind circled for weeks wrestling with this decision - and there is no easy answer.

As an aside, I read in another post that you don’t think you are strong.  Lupita - please don’t doubt your strength.  I see such a tremendous amount of strength in you.  It is so clear that you love your son.  You have sacrificed a lot for him, and did it willingly and with his well being in your heart.  You figured this out on your own, without a loving or nurturing mother to guide your steps.  You walked away from an abusive husband, recreated your life, and made the world a good place for your son.  This takes tremendous strength after having been raised by an N.
 
I am thinking of you as you undergo your upcoming surgery.  Surgery is difficult by itself; to have it compounded by an N is frightening.  Please know that, at the least in this difficult time, you have every right to think of yourself first and to put your mother on the back burner.  Do whatever you have to do to take care of yourself – regardless of how it will affect your mother.  Heal, regain your strength, and then tackle the N problem. 

((((((Sending you hugs, energy, and prayers))))))))
Peace
- Life is a journey not a destination

Confounded

  • Guest
Re: Thought process in an N?
« Reply #21 on: May 27, 2007, 11:50:43 PM »
Quote
probably you get an N husband when you have an N mother

For myself, I have to admit that I have patterned some of my own harsh behavior and my own anger after my N mother.  She and I used to battle endlessly.  She just seemed to do one irrational thing after another, and my own life seemed to be very unhappy as a result. 

Eventually, N mother had me seen by a shrink at the age of about 14, because I became so upset with her tactics that one day in the middle of one of our screaming matches I took two knives out of a drawer, pointed one at myself and one at her, and told her that if she didn't leave me alone I was going to kill both of us.

The shrink saw me for a number of months and then concluded that I needed to go away to prep school to get AWAY from her.  She said it exactly that way.  I remember that she didn't say that she thought that my mother and I should not be together.  She said that I needed to get AWAY from her.  I only recently became aware that N mother had NO idea HOW I had come up with the prep school idea.  She was surprised to learn that it had been the shrink's idea.  Can you imagine?  Your own youngster raising the topic of going away to school and you're so self -absorbed that you don't even inquire about where she got that idea?  All along I thought the shrink must have talked to Mom first.  Nope.  She just took care of her patient (me), and said nothing to N mother.  OMG.

Now, I see some of N mother's rage in myself.  The genetic component perhaps, or the environment.  I certainly can't say.  All I know if that I don't seem to get angry for the same reasons as H with his N tendencies (NT).  He cannot stand having anybody tell him he's wrong, whereas I can.  BUT if somebody pushes me, and H often does as he insists on things that are pure BS, I eventually get angry in a very N way.  I break things.  I feel compelled to do it.  He says something like, "I have a very good reason to be angry.  You make too big a deal out of this."  I explain that all I'm asking is that he tell me if he has to do something other than what we have agreed upon in a project, so that I will know that he was tracking with me, but had to make a change for some reason.  Making the change is okay. Just tell me about it, because otherwise I get nervous that maybe we weren't tracking, and our not tracking can lead to arguments.  He keeps raging.  So he's raging about my ding something to avoid his rage.  I send him off to sleep in the guest room, but not without a recap.  I tell him he's raging about my doing something to avoid his rage.  I tell him I'm very worried about him, because I expect him to crash and burn once he changes jobs. I tell him that I hope he dies in his sleep.  He think s that everything he has ever done or said was fine.  I feel bad for being such a bitch.  Having been in the correct in the original argument gives me NO right to talk like that.  But he just pushes me and pushes me.  I sound like him.  She pushes me and pushes me. 

Ahhhhhh!  Is my head going to explode or what?  I wish it would!  Better yet, his should explode.  I would be happy to have him gone!  I'm right back to being the little girl with two knives, one pointed at the N, and one pointed at herself.  I feel so angry and frustrated.  I have to break something.  Where is something of his?  There!  A pair of pants that he wants me to sew a button on.  Rip!  Rip!  Rip!  Rip!!!  They are shredded.  I feel better.  I won't be sewing that button on for him.

By morning I am aware that my N mother's rage, annoyance, and indifference rubbed off on me.  I am indifferent to his priorities when they interfere with my workalholic tendencies.  I am exhibiting numerous N-like behaviors, directed at my H with NT.  The T that said he has NT said I had a little bit of N and a little bit of OCD.  He said that is was nothing significant.  Pretty "normal" whatever that is.  I had only gone as far as the part about believing that I'm usually (NOT always) right, and I'm pretty great.  I am usually right.  I wait until I have enough info to form an opinion, and I am well aware of what I don't know.  As for pretty great, well most people seem to think so, H's occasional anger-driven pronouncements to the contrary notwithstanding.  The thing is, I may not reason like an N.  But when attacked by an N, I counterattack like a Super N.  I spew hatered, insults, condemnation, and most of all rage. 

I have broken almost everything that H owned when we met.  I always thought it was about his preference for his late wife (I broke things that spoke of her because it hurt so badly to be compaired unfavorably with another woman, and especially one whom others describe as weak and depressed.  But now I see that the source of our problems had more to do with his being so adamant about everything, never yielding to logic, in other words having NT.  Then to compound it even more, he appeared to be a sexist pig, the way he kept trying to squelch my ideas, and shut me up, and THAT was something that my N mother had taught me not to tolerate.  She's a serious feminist.  I could not believe the way my H used to talk to me "You should do this."  "I'm was just giving you a correction" (of my way of being).  He wanted "obey" in my wedding vows to him...  NOT!

I think that he was being very N and trying to stop me from acting like my N mother.  OMG.

I feel like I'm opening up one of those wooden dolls from Russia that has another doll inside, and another, and another.  I will have to sleep on this in order to make any sense out of this, if that is possible at all.

So many of us with N mothers married men with N issues.  Have you been down this road?  Realizing that when logical discussions break down with your NH (as they often do), you're flaring your N mother's kind of rage on your NH?     
« Last Edit: May 28, 2007, 04:52:25 PM by Confounded »

michael

  • Guest
Re: Thought process in an N?
« Reply #22 on: May 28, 2007, 12:59:23 AM »
Quote
probably you get an N husband when you have an N mother

For myself, I have to admit that I have patterned some of my own harsh behavior and my own anger after my N mother.  She and I used to battle endlessly.  She just seemed to do one irrational thing after another, and my own life seemed to be very unhappy as a result. 

Eventually, N mother had me seen by a shrink at the age of about 14, because I became so upset with her tactics that one day in the middle of one of our screaming matches I took two knives out of a drawer, pointed one at myself and one at her, and told her that if she didn't leave me alone I was going to kill both of us.

The shrink saw me for a number of months and then concluded that I needed to go away to prep school to get AWAY from her.  She said it exactly that way.  I remember that she didn't say that she thought that my mother and I should not be together.  She said that I needed to get AWAY from her.  I only recently became aware that N mother had NO idea HOW I had come up with the prep school idea.  She was surprised to learn that it had been the shrink's idea.  Can you imagine?  Your own youngster raising the topic of going away to school and you're so self -absorbed that you don't even inquire about where she got that idea?  All along I thought the shrink must have talked to Mom first.  Nope.  She just took care of her patient (me), and said nothing to N mother.  OMG.

Now, I see some of N mother's rage in myself.  The genetic component perhaps, or the environment.  I certainly can't say.  All I know if that I don't seem to get angry for the same reasons as H with his N tendencies (NT).  He cannot stand having anybody tell him he's wrong, whereas I can.  BUT if somebody pushes me, and H often does as he insists on things that are pure BS, I eventually get angry in a very N way.  I break things.  I feel compelled to do it.  He says something like, "I have a very good reason to be angry.  You make too big a deal out of this."  I explain that all I'm asking is that he tell me if he has to do something other than what we have agreed upon in a project, so that I will know that he was tracking with me, but had to make a change for some reason.  Making the change is okay. Just tell me about it, because otherwise I get nervous that maybe we weren't tracking, and our not tracking can lead to arguments.  He keeps raging.  So he's raging about my ding something to avoid his rage.  I send him off to sleep in the guest room, but not without a recap.  I tell him he's raging about my doing something to avoid his rage.  I tell him I'm very worried about him, because I expect him to crash and burn once he changes jobs. I tell him that I hope he dies in his sleep.  He think s that everything he has ever done or said was fine.  I feel bad for being such a bitch.  Having been in the right in the original argument gives my right to talk like that.  But he just pushes me and pushes me.  I sound like him.  She pushes me and pushes me. 

Ahhhhhh!  Is my head going to explode or what?  I wish it would!  Better yet, his should explode.  I would be happy to have him gone!  I'm right back to being the little girl with two knives, one pointed at the N, and one pointed at herself.  I feel so angry and frustrated.  I have to break something.  Where is something of his?  There!  A pair of pants that he wants me to sew a button on.  Rip!  Rip!  Rip!  Rip!!!  They are shredded.  I feel better.  I won't be sewing that button on for him.

By morning I am aware that my N mother's rage, annoyance, and indifference rubbed off on me.  I am indifferent to his priorities when they interfere with my workalholic tendencies.  I am exhibiting numerous N-like behaviors, directed at my H with NT.  The T that said he has NT said I had a little bit of N and a little bit of OCD.  He said that is was nothing significant.  Pretty "normal" whatever that is.  I had only gone as far as the part about believing that I'm usually (NOT always) right, and I'm pretty great.  I am usually right.  I wait until I have enough info to form an opinion, and I am well aware of what I don't know.  As for pretty great, well most people seem to think so, H's occasional anger-driven pronouncements to the contrary notwithstanding.  The thing is, I may not reason like an N.  But when attacked by an N, I counterattack like a Super N.  I spew hatered, insults, condemnation, and most of all rage. 

I have broken almost everything that H owned when we met.  I always thought it was about his preference for his late wife (I broke things that spoke of her because it hurt so badly to be compaired unfavorably with another woman, and especially one whom others describe as weak and depressed.  But now I see that the source of our problems had more to do with his being so adamant about everything, never yielding to logic, in other words having NT.  Then to compound it even more, he appeared to be a sexist pig, the way he kept trying to squelch my ideas, and shut me up, and THAT was something that my N mother had taught me not to tolerate.  She's a serious feminist.  I could not believe the way my H used to talk to me "You should do this."  "I'm was just giving you a correction" (of my way of being).  He wanted "obey" in my wedding vows to him...  NOT!

I think that he was being very N and trying to stop me from acting like my N mother.  OMG.

I feel like I'm opening up one of those wooden dolls from Russia that has another doll inside, and another, and another.  I will have to sleep on this in order to make any sense out of this, if that is possible at all.

So many of us with N mothers married men with N issues.  Have you been down this road?  Realizing that when logical discussions break down with your NH (as they often do), you're flaring your N mother's kind of rage on your NH?     

hi confounded...
some stuff here on rage that you might find insightful..
maybe u have come across it before ..it has been mentioned before in this forum

namely npa theory of types by benis...
  here is the main site url... http://www.npatheory.com/
here is a paste of a section rage
Traits of narcissism (N), perfectionism (P) and aggression (A)


Karen Horney advanced the concept that at maturity there exist at least three expansive character types, namely the "narcissistic", the "perfectionistic" and the "arrogant-vindictive".[4]  Extending these ideas, the NPA model posits that the human character rests primarily on the existence of three major traits: narcissism (N), perfectionism (P) and aggression (A). Each of these traits is assumed to exist as the expression of a single major pleiotropic gene. Horney considered that the traits have environmental origins, being the result of an individual's desperate search for dominance in the context of a stifling upbringing.[5]  The NPA model -- in ascribing the traits to genetic origins -- emphasizes biological attributes associated with the traits.


Aggression


The behavioral trait of aggression is acknowledged to be the most labile of the three.[6]  The stereotypic acts associated with this trait involve body posturing, gestures, and eye contact of intimidation and deference, with individuals having this trait continually competing with each other on a scale of dominance and submission. The trait of aggression corresponds to a striving for power over one's environment, hence it is one main component of competitiveness in social relations, or ambition. In a pejorative connotation the trait may reveal itself in the context of sadism or sadomasochism. The facial expression is non-sanguine, i.e., tending toward sallowness or pallor in individuals of light skin color. The hallmark of the trait of aggression is a mass discharge of the sympathetic nervous system: the "fight or flight" response or the aggressive-vindictive rage. During the expression of this rage, the facial complexion of pallor is accentuated.


Narcissism


The trait of narcissism is noted to be less labile than that of aggression (where individuals may be constantly altering their character states on a scale of dominance and submission).[6]  The stereotypic acts associated with the trait include self-flaunting body posturing, expansive arm gestures, bowing, instinctive self-adornment, and a natural attraction to the limelight of personal recognition. Individuals having only this trait (of the three) are competitive but non-aggressive in their strivings for recognition. The trait corresponds to a striving for glory in one's environment, representing the second main component of human ambition. In a pejorative connotation, the unbridled trait of narcissism may reveal itself in the context of conceit, exhibitionism, vanity or messianism. An associated facial expression includes the radiant gingival smile (broadly exposing the gums and teeth). The facial complexion in individuals of light skin color tends toward blood-red or ruddy. Hallmarks of the trait include blushing, flushing, and a mass discharge of the parasympathetic nervous system: the narcissistic rage of defense and withdrawal. During expression of this rage the normally sanguine complexion becomes even more florid.


Perfectionism


The trait of perfectionism in the NPA model is not a basic drive of ambition and is not associated with a rage reaction.[6]  Rather it is a mediator of the unbridled drives of aggression and/or narcissism. The stereotypic acts associated with the trait of perfectionism are obsessiveness, compulsiveness, repetition, and the maintenance of neatness, order and symmetry. A clue to the nature of the trait lies in the compulsive, repetitive mannerisms of autistic children and some adult schizophrenic individuals. The behavioral pattern is often ritualistic and the speech characterized by echolalia. It is posited that such autistic and schizophrenic individuals are those in whom the two components of ambition, i.e. aggression and narcissism, have been suppressed by genetic or environmental factors, either congenitally, in childhood, or after maturity, thus revealing in the individual a primitive state of perfectionism.


Character types


The notion that humans exhibit only a limited number of discrete character types can be traced back to the time of the ancient Greeks, in particular to the theory of humors (blood, black bile, yellow bile and phlegm). The NPA model attempts to relate genetic NPA types to these character types of antiquity, as well as to the classic personality disorders of modern psychiatry.

I FOUND A LOT OF INTERESTING INSIGHTS BUT ALSO FIND THINGS I THINK HE CONCEPTUALIZES INCORRECTLY

McGirl

  • Guest
Re: Thought process in an N?
« Reply #23 on: May 28, 2007, 01:50:08 AM »
My ex is a N. My 17 y.o. son tonight took out clean laundry from the dryer and threw it on the dirty floor(basement), so he could put his clothes in the dryer.He just left it there, never even thought to fold it or put it in the table for me to fold later. He didn't even realize that he had done something wrong. These were clothes that I had washed and dryed and didn't get to fold yet. It terrifies me to think that he is this inconsiderate, as it resonates with the way his father acted. Total disregard for anyone else. I got mad and took his clean dry clothes out of he dryer and took them to his room and scattered them all over is floor. I wanted to make a point.He was really mad, but the scary thing was he didn't get the point when I explained that I felt disrespected by the way he had acted. Who did he think would have to pick up that laundry that he threw on the dirty basement floor? he looked at me blankly. He didn't think about it, he just had to dry his clothes. I was taking it "too personally" It is "just laundry". I fear that he is becoming a N as well. he doesn't ever consider somebody elses' feelings.He is spending more time around his dad because dad is giving his $$$.His dad badmouths me, I'm too emotional, too spiritual, he is the beautiful one, with the beautiful rich, fast lane life. I don't know where the boy I raised has gone. I fear I'll never see him again.My son won't see a therapist. I want him to learn feelings. My ex left when my son was 14, ready to start high school. he was devastated. he quit feeling after that. he only does happy and angry. Sad hurts too much, He was sad for 2 weeks and couldn't stand it so he started using drugs and just got mad. he has seen therapists but he won't open up. I just keep trying to teach him right and wrong, and how to be comsiderate. ANy suggestions?

Hopalong

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13619
Re: Thought process in an N?
« Reply #24 on: May 28, 2007, 07:21:22 AM »
Oh McGirl. Welcome.
I do not have useful advice,
but I too will be glad to read...

It may be that he must wait
for his own life blows to awaken him.

You'll find much wisdom here.

Hopalong
"That'll do, pig, that'll do."

Lupita

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2457
Re: Thought process in an N?
« Reply #25 on: May 28, 2007, 09:04:30 AM »
Today is Monday. My mom is going back home on Wednesday. My surgery is postpone till the middle of June, since it is an elective surgery. I feel guilty and sad. I was feeling wonderful before she came. Miss Universe was nothing compared to me. I felt skinny and powerful. I was happy. After ten days with my other I feel extremely depressed, I am not a good daughter, and I cannot compensate my mother ofr all the things she did for me.
The worst, she is sad too. My mother is not a bad person. I feel very bad that I have said bad things about her in here. I regret I did. Hope that God will not punish me for betraying my mother the way I have. i feel so guilty, so sad, I don't want her to go. I really wish that she did not make me sad in purpose.
Now I know why i feel so bad when my students disrespect me. Now I know why I feel so bad when a person gives me a look for any reason.
Now I know why I feel that nobody loves me, feel so lonely, it feels so lonely.

Overcomer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2666
Re: Thought process in an N?
« Reply #26 on: May 28, 2007, 10:11:50 AM »
lup:  MY LOVE TO YOU!  There is nothing worse that regret.  It is great that you felt so skinny-think on those positive thoughts and try to keep those feelings in your heart.  You have done well to recognize your automatic responses to disrespect and dirty looks-now if you can gain some power by understanding those things you can use that to not take things as personally as you once did.
Kelly

"The Best Way Out is Through........and try laughing at yourself"

Sally

  • Guest
Re: Thought process in an N?
« Reply #27 on: May 28, 2007, 10:54:18 AM »
Dear Friends,

There is so much wonderful wisdom in this thread and on this web site.  People share their insights and I have learned so much and have been helped so much.

I think one of the reasons (maybe the main reason) we are all here posting or reading this web site is because we are so baffled by N behavior and the N behavior has reduced our quality of life and has often ruined our happiness.

Based on what I've learned, the "experts" (psychologists and psychiatrists) disagree about the cause of Nism.  The experts give us insights to Nism, but few solutions.

One solution I have found and want to share is this:  We cannot change the behavior or thinking of other people (especially Ns).  Only the person themself can decide that THEY want to change THEMSELF.  Accepting these ideas has brought me great peace of mind and has helped me deal with Ns.

I think that people who had N parents believe that they CAN change the behavior & thinking of another person; ( I think that the idea that someone can change the behavior & thinking of another person is very Nish because it shows that someone wants to control the other person and this need to control others is very Nish).

So, once we accept that we cannot change the behavior & thinking of another person (such as an N), we have to accept the REALITY that they are the way they are and they will not change UNLESS THEY THEMSELF WANT TO CHANGE.

Once we accept that we cannot change the behavior & thinking of another person, we learn to protect ourselves from that person (the N) by putting up boundaries to protect ourselves.

The boundaries we put up vary according to the situation and the N:  perhaps we see or speak to the N less frequently, or we go "no contact" or we divorce the N spouse.

The point is that WE do have power is the relationship.  By accepting that we cannot change the N and using boundaries, we no longer have to be the victims of the N.  We no longer have to give our power to the N so that the N can drive us crazy or make us miserable.

These ideas seem simple to undertsand, but can be difficult to put into action.  But, I keep trying and it has helped me.

With love,
Sally

Sally

  • Guest
Re: Thought process in an N?
« Reply #28 on: May 28, 2007, 11:48:20 AM »
He says that he is acting 'good'. Well, he is acting like someone should act. However, he does not get that I do not feel any closeness to him.He is angry that I  am not forgiving and want to 'make it work"
 I feel like he is acting"good' because he has no choice. I still don't feel like I can trust him. I don't feel like  he has my "back". He just "can't get away with it anymore".
   He says that he is sorry. I think that he is. However, if I don't feel like I can  rely that he "has my back."I guess that i feel, down deep, that he is still the enemy,but now with a smile. It still feels like he wants to destroy me like my mother does.. It is a visceral thing. I can't just be weal and real with him or he will see it as 'Now I can get her."..."The ball is in your court".In other words, he is being good now so it's my fault if we don't have a good relationship.
   he went away over night . I feel so great when he is not here,like a trip to Hawaii.
Now, he is coming home and a depression is coming over me

Ami,
I completely understand how you feel. It's a horrible to feel that the person you thought you "love" doesn't have your back and you dread being with them.  Yes, I know this feeling.
The only advise I have is to do intensive therapy with a therapist who understands you.  You must look at your feelings with a therapist and then you can understand how you really feel and what you want to do.  I think you have got to ascertain the bare bone of your feelings. 

Love,
Sally


Lupita

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2457
Re: Thought process in an N?
« Reply #29 on: May 29, 2007, 08:59:56 AM »
Thank you dear nice people of the board. Thank you for so much wisdom. I will think about it and digest it slowly. Can't think clearly now. Too sad. Need some time. God bless you.