I believe you, Ami.
I don't think there's anything wrong with calling something inappropriate that you believe is.
There's a line between neutrally saying, I think that's inappropriate, and saying
YOU are a bully.
It's like the difference between those I statements and You statements.
One owns your own opinions and feelings, the other labels another person as bad.
So, and I'm not remembering the exact train of dialogue, but instead of:
Lighter: blunt frustrated post about this and that, challenging you, describing your pattern as she sees it
Bill: Lighter, you are a bully, bad person, with bad intent
Ami: And you're a woman
maybe it could work better this way:
Lighter: Less blunt, sensitive and diplomatic post that challenges you and describes your pattern as she sees it
Bill: silence
Ami: ? (free to consider what Lighter was trying to give you, w/o distraction)
I may not be analysing all this very well and it may not be helpful but I hope it is
And if we need to disagree that's okay too. There's room for that w/o heat.
Must go to work...
xo
Hops
PS--I think the debate about Lighter and Jac is a tangent that got throw in to blow smoke--not related, imo, so in her very latest posts, she sounds hurt about that to me...so her tone's amped up
Okay, now I will try to mind my own business
while still opining about everything
