Point well taken, Janet.
I agree...allopathic medicine has been compromised by many forces. Nothing pure left in anything institutionalized, probably. That said, I did learn while a health editor to approach medicine and healing as a smorgasbord of human talent and caring, and that included scientists and even some drug-inventors.
So for me, ideal medicine is a combination of Western, Eastern, self-help, mind-body, nutritional, etc. That's all I'm getting at. The journal I thought sounded kind of quacky.
I came to admire a lot of scientists I met in my work. Likewise, I've come to admire a lot of off-the-grid healing arts. Anyhow, when it comes to research, I do, likely just because of the environments I've worked in, tend to favor evidence-based medicine. But I'm mindful that can be warped by who's presenting the evidene and writing up the study etc. I worked for someone who was known by his colleagues and the graduate fellows for constantly tweaking the numbers to please the pharmaceutical company they were hoping would sponsor the next round of their research--being seriously ethically compromised. And his colleagues and superiors would not.
It was ghastly but there is a level of desperation among researchers because so much money has gone to support the war and now there's far far less for the crucial disease research. These projects are so very expensive to set up and do properly, and if their funding is cut partway through it can be devastating to whole teams of researchers and set back or destroy years of work...not to mention harming the poplulation the research was set up to help in the first place. (Ironically, the corrupt researcher I knew began his studies in his discipline out of a passion to preserve life, which I believe he still feels. His ethical compromises were always just slight enough to not invalidate outcomes...but they were enough to be noticed.)
Rambling, rambling...
Hops