Hey Hops... take it easy on yourself, a minute. There is nothing wrong with trying to explore things from a different set of "rules of engagement" (military term, but also double entendre).
This is pondering season for me, as you know. And given that I'm also dealing with relationships right now too... I am pondering this "thing called love" and our ideas of it, along with the feelings, their origins, etc cerebral "disassembly, oiling the parts, and re-assembly". I don't claim to "know" anything definitively, 100% guaranteed, your money back... but in the what-if dept. or creative BS... whichever one prefers... [end preamble]
I think sometime our emotional intelligence develops & grows at a different rate than say, our perceptions and values and cognitive abilities. And when it comes around to our ideas about "love" and what that's supposed to feel like, and be in the day to day, real life manifestation... well, I think we reach back to some of our earliest "understandings" of what it's supposed to be & feel like. And there's some kind of "sanctity" (for me anyway) attached to that idea/understanding; something pure and unadulterated by changes in societal culture or anything external at all. But of course, I'm a romantic and idealist (if it needs a label)... and that conflicts quite often with my practical and pragmatic self.
One thing I became aware of in that long rip van winkle time after Mike died and I uprooted myself to go somewhere new - yet close to "home" - was that I felt it was time for me to update my ideas about love, should I ever be silly enough to entertain another relationship. What was a functional definition of that relationship when I was 16 just doesn't work for me, now that I'm 60-something. I wouldn't expect it to, either. But somehow - it hadn't seemed to have changed. I wanted to feel that thrill of butterflies... OMG, he LIKES ME... to be his "special person"... and listen to all my mental perambulations as I sorted my own self out. I wanted to look into his eyes and "get him"... and feel reasonably sure he saw and got me too. [sorry for the vague, fuzzy language - it's all I got for emotional stuff]
It kinda dawned on me, that this idea kinda matched up with what I understand enmeshment to be. At least - the FEELING - of it, if not the "rules of engagement/relationship". Simplistically, my understanding of enmeshment = bad, but love = good caused a logical conflict here.... because in some precognitive sensory way... they both felt the same to me. (And this is leaving out the long analytical study of dysfunctional attachments from FOO) And off I went, down another rabbithole, with the dedication of a Jack Russell terrier...
So, some of the conflict is vocabulary. We just don't have a good descriptive vocabulary for emotions to draw on, I find. When Hol and I are in one of our deep conversations about this stuff - we end up making up words; smooshing things together; combining opposites even, to more accurately convey what we think we mean. The other thing going on, is that my idea of what the "ideal" love or relationship IS, hadn't grown, changed or matured over time. It was still stuck back in my youth. And since that idea came out of dysfunctional attachment - I kinda had to go back to the drawing board. Start from scratch. Redesign. That took TIME; experimentation; daydreaming; and of course, going back over my more significant historical relationships.
So, eventually - I was able to come up with some examples of things that seemed better suited to me now. And that necessitated a complete re-write of what my idea of relationship IS. What the "rules" are; what works/what doesn't - for me. What I like/don't like.
It sounds kinda like what you're into now with M, is the same sort of process - different; your own - but figuring it out. Whether we're conscious of it or not, our capacity for - our tolerance - of things changes as we mature. Things that used to drive us up a wall, maybe aren't such a big deal anymore. Or they're more intense even. I think it comes down to a choice of what we want to experience on a daily basis. Rules of engagement, in other words. The ideas of what your relationship consists of - has changed in some ways.
Why not let it be what it's going to be and simply discover how it feels along the way? Decisions often evolve out of circumstances; they don't necessarily need to be negotiated from the get-go. That helps smooth out the duality of ideas/perception and those seeds of pure emotion... lets things germinate more organically.
(I THINK; like stated in the preamble; I don't KNOW. I'm winging this, same way you are m'dear... this is just some of my pondering about things. Maybe there's something useful in it.)
ETA: edited the usual caffiene-fueled typos...