Author Topic: Am I the Only Agnostic?  (Read 10031 times)

WRITE

  • Guest
Re: Am I the Only Agnostic?
« Reply #15 on: August 20, 2006, 04:27:37 PM »
I think Jesus could cope without my constant adoration and attention Laura  :)
He also said 'why call me good- no one is good but G_d' Mark 10

I haven't read all the threads but I am sorry you are having a difficult time with your marriage (((((((((((()))))))))))))))

***

I'd be interested to know what you think of Buddhism too, H, and I've been wondering how your lunch went and if you're ok.


reallyME

  • Guest
Re: Am I the Only Agnostic?
« Reply #16 on: August 20, 2006, 04:48:19 PM »
Um that might fly with me, if I didn't know that Jesus and God are one and the same entity

WRITE

  • Guest
Re: Am I the Only Agnostic?
« Reply #17 on: August 20, 2006, 04:58:00 PM »
This isn't a complete history but basically The Trinity is very much a human doctrine:

A.D. 29 Jesus said, "The Lord our God is one Lord" (Mark 12:29).

A.D. 57 Paul said, "To us there is but one God" (1 Cor. 8:6).

A.D. 96 Clement said, "Christ was sent by God".

A.D. 120 "Apostles' Creed": "I believe in God the Father".

A.D. 150 Justin Martyr, introduces Greek Philosophy.

A.D. 170 The word "Trias", appears first in Christian literature.

A.D. 200. "Trinitas" is first introduced by Tertullian.

A.D. 280 Origen, opposes prayers to Christ.

A.D. 260 Sabellius: "Father, Son and Holy Ghost are three names for the same God".

A.D. 300 Trinitarian prayers unknown in the Church.

A.D. 325 "Nicene Creed" afflrms Christ to be "Very God of Very God".

A.D. 370 Doxology composed.

A.D. 381. Council of Constantinople invents "Three persons in One God".

A.D. 388 Emperor Theodosius threatens punishment to all who won't worship the Trinity.

A.D. 519 Doxology ordered to be sung in all the Churches.

A.D. 669 Clergy commanded to commit to memory the "Athanasian Creed".

A.D. 826 Bishop Basil, required the clergy to repeat the " Athanasian Creed" every Sunday.

***

I have always found The Trinity to be somewhat divisive, I guess I am a Unitarian.
G_d is simply G_d to me, though Christ and all the prophets and all the good belongs to the same Spirit.


Hopalong

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13603
Re: Am I the Only Agnostic?
« Reply #18 on: August 20, 2006, 04:59:37 PM »
Wow. Thank you everyone. A lot! I feel present and accounted for.
(Pehaps my ego was suffering...it'll do that.) But your responses are so rich, varied, thoughtful and honest. What more could anyone ask? I think nuttin'. I read all of it and then I thought...

You dummy (self), you knew that. Meaning, I knew that people are honest and forthright and just being who they are and speaking the language that is truest for them here. I didn't forget, exactly, I think I was just feeling a little overwhelmed (old associations of prejudice and even some present ones about the state of the world re. religious wars, etc). All better. Ohmmmmmm.... (Kidding, I have a squirrel in my brain that makes me a lousy meditator). But yes, Plucky, btw, I do relate very hummingly to Buddhist concepts. Not all the way, but then, that would be agnostic thing too. I LIKE the compassion over everything else that many branches of Buddhism spend the most energy on.

I looked up another definition of agnostic that sounded less negative than doubting or being skeptical about god, but in my own words, holding the space of not knowing (But Write, "noncomittal" was the secondary definition -- a person who can't or won't commit to something, as in a "political agnostic"--GREAT! Oh well, Mud knows me better. Reliably soppy liberal. Hmm. Not entirely true actually, I have some conservative views, particularly regarding children. Tigerish and nonpermissive, I guess...). :? Back to agnostic--somehow in my brain/spirit, though, to hold that space as unknown IS faith. Sounds back-assward, I know, but in paradox sometimes things make more sense to me. What I mean is...I have faith that it is not necessary for me to declare belief, because if there were deity/ies I could believe in, it/they would be about such love as is beyond human comprehension AND any language or text and to which the limits of my imagination or will OR language would be irrelevant. (That's why I see many books as about the human impulse toward the sacred but no books as sacred.) I think this has something to do with my feelings about writing, too, but I can't articulate that better yet. I know when I majored in linguistics there was a ghastly moment when we were crawling around inside the micro-units of syllables called monemes and phonemes and I had a really shattering awareness of words literally dissolving into having no weight. Once (I) reassembled, I think they'd lost a lot of their absolute might.

Right, the other definition: a person who holds the view that any ultimate reality (as God) is unknown and probably unknowable; broadly : one who is not committed to believing in either the existence or the nonexistence of God or a god [Merriam Webster online]

I did a little essay in an online paper a few months ago:
---------
I'm a very optimistic agnostic, ripe for a deathbed epiphany. I found my faith in a community, not a creed.

Traditional religion fell apart for me decades ago, with the painful realization that I was "less than" in most traditions because of my gender. It broke my heart, and I lost the words for worship -- but how I missed it.
 
Eventually I found the Unitarian Universalist Church and hovered in the back pews for over a year, fighting the fear that I would have to leave my mind at the door and affirm a belief statement someone else wrote. It threatened me beyond all measure, as scolding responses to reason and doubt had scarred me in Sunday school as a child.

(The UUC kept that part pretty secret, I thought, but I knew they'd spring it on me when I asked about membership.)

There was no such requirement. A kind gentleman with amazing crow's-feet invited me to sign my name in a book and gave me a pat on the back. With that gesture I was welcomed into a dynamic religious community that has inspired me and comforted me for the last 20 years.

I still fret about the "To Whom It May Concern" part when I pray, but I pray anyway. My faith in the strength and purpose of this community has grown very strong over the years. I can worship without words, or with an evolving script, and I know I am welcome, I am home.

------------

Anyway, thank you again, all of you. Thanks to you too Richard, for sharing your wonderful Bat Mitzvah words. That was a mitzvah! I bet many of us could only dream of a father or partner with humor and such love.

I think being on this board adds up to reading a good book, taking a long walk and making a new friend. Too bad you're not a believer because creating this board definitely gets you out of Hebrew purgatory, if there is such a thing. :)

(Penny: You crack me up. I too am terrified of cheerleaders.  :lol: NO OFFENSE TO ANY HERE!)

Thank you every single one for holding space for me. I have just about worn myself out for the moment which is likely a good thing. (Hah.)

(Except to tell you that not only does my D want to see me, but she wants the whole week off with me and specifically said, I want to go to the beach with you. Well blow me over.)

love,
Hops

PPS--Supporting R's partner D was good this morning and I had a lot of help.


« Last Edit: August 20, 2006, 05:05:59 PM by Hopalong »
"That'll do, pig, that'll do."

WRITE

  • Guest
Re: Am I the Only Agnostic?
« Reply #19 on: August 20, 2006, 06:52:34 PM »
I'm more triggered by cheerleaders than Christians
&
I too am terrified of cheerleaders

isn't that interesting, I read Penelope's comment as she was more into cheerleaders than Christians! I just thought it was part of the US culture of jollity and not wanting to be too serious!

Shows I need to look more closely at what I am reading though...

reallyME

  • Guest
Re: Am I the Only Agnostic?
« Reply #20 on: August 20, 2006, 08:21:36 PM »
sighhhhhh

mudpuppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1276
Re: Am I the Only Agnostic?
« Reply #21 on: August 20, 2006, 08:57:27 PM »
Quote
What is agnostic?


a(without or not)-gnosis(knowledge or to know).
One who believes it is impossible to prove or there is insufficient evidence for the existence of God or anything beyond the material world. By that definition Hops I would say you are more of a deist or pantheist than an agnostic.

As fas as the Trinity is concerned the word monotheism is not in the bible either but both doctrines are arrived at by a systematic theology that considers the whole of scripture.

I haven't got time to attribute them but just a few verses off the top of my head which support the trinity are;

Let us make man in Our image.
I and the Father are One.
Who has seen Me has seen the Father.
In Christ dwelleth the fullness of the Godhead bodily.
Before Abraham was I AM.
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God and the Word was God.
I baptize you in the name of the Father the Son and the Holy Spirit.

Sorry, but the Trinity is clearly and explicitly expressed in the bible.

mud

Hopalong

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13603
Re: Am I the Only Agnostic?
« Reply #22 on: August 20, 2006, 09:53:50 PM »
Thanks for the thoughts, Mud. The tricky bit missing from your definition for me is what I added in bold, which is what I mean when I use the term agnostic to describe myself. Muzzy as my thoughts are, I have been thinking about my sense of truth for decades, so I don't want to use the term carelessly.

Quote
impossible to prove or there is insufficient evidence for or against the existence of God


To explain it better, I went to Wikipedia (though people could pull texts to debate who's correct about THIS or THAT theological bit until the Library of Congress fell on their heads, and I would be long gone picking daisies, or pushing them up...).

Historical and modern deism (from Latin: deus) is defined by the view that reason and logic, rather than revelation or tradition, should be the basis of belief in God. Deists reject both organized and revealed religion and maintain that reason is the essential element in all knowledge. For a "rational basis for religion" they refer to the cosmological argument (first cause argument), the teleological argument (argument from design), and other aspects of what was called natural religion. Deism has also come to be identified with the classical belief that God created but does not intervene in the world, though this is not a necessary component of deism.

That "should be" is, for me, to close the space of "not knowing". Which is sacred to me. (Have I given you a headache yet?). I don't reject both organized and revealed religion. I don't embrace them either, although I do embrace my church...hmm. Dang. Pretzel head. What I'm saying is I don't parse the texts of various UUs because the purposes and principles it declares suffice for me, and my real spiritual home is in the love and work of the community, not in a text. (My church has a self-parody about being "disorganized" religion...but that's not really true.) For a poet I'm pretty allergic to definiteness in words...or maybe that's "as a poet." Aha moment.

Pantheism (Greek: πάν ( 'pan' ) = all and Theos = God) literally means "God is All" and "All is God". It is the view that everything is of an all-encompassing immanent God; or that the universe, or nature, and God are equivalent. More detailed definitions tend to emphasize the idea that natural law, existence, and the universe (the sum total of all that is, was, and shall be) is represented or personified in the theological principle of 'God'.

That's much closer, but the "everything is" is not something I can declare as truth either. If there is a god that I can believe in that god would be love and only love, and I believe some things in the world/universe are not love. I don't know what evil is and maybe there's something else entirely gonig on, like entropy, but I wouldn't be capable of worshipping that even if I did have a revelation. So although I can acknowledge the reality of everything like a pantheist, so far, I can't see it all as good. And since I deeply believe that kindness and compassion are good, and lions eat antelopes that they don't kill kindly (iow, there is much in nature that my human heart identifies as cruel even if it's natural), I couldn't model my spiritual life purely after natural law.

Hmmm. This may be boring to read but it's very helpful to write.

Agnostic has been the best word I can use for myself for a long time now. Hope nobody will bother reading my rambles about it if they find it tedious. Right now I'm using this to avoid doing work I need to do. I am a terrible procrastinator.

Don't you hate it when you're in the middle of a confusing thriller and it's all pointless action for a while so you go to the bathroom and right then they begin some lengthy dialogue that actually explains the plot and you're just out of earshot? (That's not a theological question.)

Hops
« Last Edit: August 20, 2006, 10:20:50 PM by Hopalong »
"That'll do, pig, that'll do."

movinon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 222
  • Silence is complicity
Re: Am I the Only Agnostic?
« Reply #23 on: August 20, 2006, 10:34:45 PM »
Well Hops,

I think we might be on the same page here...and bible quotes do NOTHING to convince me of anything since I don't subscribe to it.

I believe in something much more earthly and definately feminine (surprise huh?)

I get tired and have to admit somewhat triggered by all the christian talk, but I do have to admit that I think, with the exception of a very few, most christians are accepting and loving of others (and their beliefs) and quote bible verse as a means to offer hope and support to others. 

Movinon
An eye for an eye will only make the whole world blind.

WRITE

  • Guest
Re: Am I the Only Agnostic?
« Reply #24 on: August 20, 2006, 11:04:16 PM »
Don't you hate it when you're in the middle of a confusing thriller and it's all pointless action for a while so you go to the bathroom and right then they begin some lengthy dialogue that actually explains the plot and you're just out of earshot?

 :lol:

I get tired and have to admit somewhat triggered by all the christian talk

that reminds me what I was going to ask you Movinon- did you leave your church community? I remember you talking a lot about it at one time and hoping you would still be supported there.



moonlight52

  • Guest
Re: Am I the Only Agnostic?
« Reply #25 on: August 21, 2006, 01:45:35 AM »
I was a child not even three I still remember the awe of the sacred universe before words.
What did Jesus say about a child's faith.

Everyone comes to their own view of the universe and thats what we are doing .
I see so much love and sharing and really you guys are smart. :D

I have learned a lot.This kind of caring is not what I grew up with .My heart is touched
by the love and kindness here.My gentle mom did try to show me the way.....

hugs to all ,

Moon
« Last Edit: August 21, 2006, 02:06:05 AM by moonlight52 »

moonlight52

  • Guest
Re: Am I the Only Agnostic?
« Reply #26 on: August 21, 2006, 05:44:08 AM »
Your higher self can be a bridge to God,in the Christian tradition there is a phrase "thy will be done".

Within that phrase is the concept of trust and acceptance

In the acceptance is the trust of the One.Also present is living life  as it comes to you.

Though your higher self ,you can  reach that which is called God.You can choose to access the Oneness ,the concept of God.

In a way your higher self is a path to the great energy of God.Universal Love

When you can trust your higher self and move into acceptance  of "thy will be done"
then there can be  discovery of the sacred in all

As I write these words they are a reminder to myself really.I was sharing my deepest understanding of what Faith means to me .
My faith needs no church ,dogma and my faith resides in my heart...............Each to his or her own beliefs .

MoonLight
NO PAINFUL EXPERIANCE OR LOSS HAS EVER  EFFECTED MY FAITH IN GOD
« Last Edit: August 21, 2006, 09:33:48 PM by moonlight52 »

Hopalong

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13603
Re: Am I the Only Agnostic?
« Reply #27 on: August 21, 2006, 06:45:27 AM »
I like that, Moon. A lot.

Thank you!

((((Moon))))

Hops
"That'll do, pig, that'll do."

Stormchild

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1183
  • It's about becoming real.
    • Gale Warnings
Re: Am I the Only Agnostic?
« Reply #28 on: August 21, 2006, 06:47:10 AM »
Hops - just want to check: did this post of mine upset you?

http://www.voicelessness.com/disc3/index.php?topic=2942.msg47874#msg47874

Did this one?

http://www.voicelessness.com/disc3/index.php?topic=2942.msg49810#msg49810

The source for the first is apparent; the source for the second, while a famous author, was also one of the greatest amateur theologians of her time and place.

I'm forming an impression that, although these seemed welcome at the time, they've become unwelcome in retrospect; so I'd like to be clear how best to proceed in future.

When others need comfort I share with them the words that I have found most suited to the occasion... those words aren't always mine. If you would prefer that I not share them because of their specific source, or the belief underlying them, let me know, and I will honor your request. That may mean that I stay silent, on occasion, when I would like to offer comfort, because the comfort I would most want to offer is unwelcome.

One thing I find very interesting: I am unchurched, by choice, after many attempts. It is precisely because, in my experience, most churches worship themselves; that is, the people worship the organization and its hierarchy. Sort of a clique exaltation system; and if ever a god had feet of clay, that one does.
The only way out is through, and the only way to win is not to play.

"... truth is all I can stand to live with." -- Moonlight52

http://galewarnings.blogspot.com

http://strangemercy.blogspot.com

http://potemkinsoffice.blogspot.com

Hopalong

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13603
Re: Am I the Only Agnostic?
« Reply #29 on: August 21, 2006, 06:53:24 AM »
Oh nonononononononononnoooooooo, Stormy, I loved them.
They were very moving, and JUST right. Truly comforted me.
The lamentations really touched me, they were so "unsanitized."
Sure pure, human, ancient grief.

I'm so glad you asked. Heavens no, I don't mind when people quote from the Bible.
Anybody can quote from anything and I'm feeling quite all right now.

I think I just needed to raise my voice about other kinds of faith or faith quests.

And I did, and I felt very heard.
I'm really okay now.

You are a sweetheart for checking, though.
(((((Storm)))))

Hops (I tire of texts only when they're presented to me as The Truth, though I
respect that for many, if not most, people, they are.)
I'm watching/listening to Roy Orbison and Friends "Black & White"--wonderful way to start the day.
"That'll do, pig, that'll do."