For me, I've to re-learn what love is. My parents gave me a twisted example of love. With them, love is something you earn by "being good" (i.e. meeting their needs). There is no room for making mistakes, learning from those mistakes. If I messed up, then I didn't deserve their love. Yet, as I type this now, I see that for them it was just the opposite. I was obligated to love them. I HAD to love them no matter what. This meant saying nice things about them in front of people. (This was big for them.), oh and many other things that were just illusion and not honest love.
They didn't need to do anything to earn my love, but I had to earn theirs. Even more so, they could do anything and I still had to love them.
My husband and my kids have helped me to see a more healthy view of love. Love the person not their actions. It's confusing for me. I remember the time I got into a minor fender bender with our new car. The first thought that crossed my mind was that my husband would leave me. It just isn't natural to me that I don't need to earn other people's love. Yet, I would never expect my husband and children to earn my love.
I guess I'm saying that for any of us who grew up in this twisted world of love, the idea of unconditional love is going to be very mixed up. I don't want anyone telling me that I HAVE to love anyone, yet I do love my children unconditionally. I can't imagine a thing they could do that would make me not love them, it doesn't feel overwhelming to me.
Is unconditional love a choice or an obligation?
Oh Jynna - that's lovely, but you know that if one of your kids was caught red-handed, literally, in a Columbine type situation, and wasn't blind drunk or stoned, and said he or she had enjoyed every minute and couldn't wait to do it again - [God forbid all of this, may it never be, not even in their video games!] - if you didn't re-evaluate your feelings for them, I'd be very concerned about you.
Ted Kaczynski was turned in by his own brother.
Scott Peterson's half sister was not in the least sorry to see him go.
There comes a time when 'unconditional love' just isn't a remotely sane response, anymore. And this isn't totally far fetched off the wall thinking - real, normal, average people have to deal with such things, sadly more often than we know.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bean - I hate to say it, but even maternal love is conditional to an extent. Go read about oxytocin and the bonding power of a baby's smile.
"The infant's smile and the parents' responses to it suggest a theory as to the evolutionary advantage that smiling confers. It appears to transform the infant's first, most fundamental relationship. Mothers say it is at this stage that they feel themselves to be dealing with another human being -- that they are no longer mere attendants of a screeching diaper-soiling device but people involved in an intimate relationship. The infant has at last become a person."
[note added by Stormchild: for fathers, this usually happens when the kid is long out of diapers and old enough to throw a ball

]
from here:
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1175/is_v21/ai_4724963/pg_2And theologically, even God's love is -ultimately- conditional.
For those who believe in judgement after life, the conditionality is direct and straightforward.
But it's just as conditional for those who believe that all will be ultimately saved, because for those who are warped or evil to be accepted into the kingdom, they first have to be repaired, or they would bring Hell into Heaven. Choosing to fix them is a precondition for rewarding them with eternal love!
But this doesn't really matter.
Love is a miracle.
Any time we experience it, anywhere, from anyone [human or animal], we are blessed.