[quote ]
The other thing I'm wondering about is, if we're all shame based and we all do things to run from the shame--is the real difference between us and N's, the damage we do to those around us? Do enablers do less damage? Is the difference actually a personality difference in how we deal with our shame? Can I be really, really transparent and say that there is a certain amount of mileage that I got out of being a martyr? Of suffering for Jesus?
Sheesh.
And I can quit hiding in shame from the narcissism in my heart. I can look at it and know that it doesnt define me, it is just an ugly part of me that needs to be dealt with. If it doesnt define me, then it can't shame me.
CB
[/quote]
CB, 'preciate all your honesty and soul searching. This is just in my quest and may not be true for others: shame was used to control me as a kid, to keep me down, to prevent me from being a threat to my parents. I have learned in therapy that when I get scared, stressed to the max, hurt, or confused, I revert to my "basics" - my childhood reactions, which are automatic and include shame. I don't believe we are all shame-based; those of us who struggle with self-esteem, and certain deep-seated fears seem to find shame at the bottom and the ultimate obstacle. What helped me was developing "hearing" to listen to all the shame messages I was given - of course, the most important one was, "You won't remember" or "No one will believe you", so it was really hard to let those bubble to the surface. Shame, to me, is the opposite of acceptance, approbation, and praise. In that way, I can see what you're saying about not letting it define you. Is it possible that you were made to feel ashamed whenever you strutted your stuff as a kid???
Best, Kate