We can’t kick “S” off even if we want to.
It is clear that “S” is provocative and disruptive.
Engaging in conversation with “S” only leads to is tying oneselves up in knots – and I believe “S” intends that.
S is hard to ignore when she comes mewing back like some innocent little kitten. Yet, any kindness offered gets upturned, all in the name of “S” ‘right’ to respond.
What you get is a kick in the teeth for your effort.
Isn’t this what we’ve encountered throughout our lives living with N’s? “S” can’t be addressed in any way, because “S” doesn’t want to be addressed.
Collectively here is something we can do, and it can be done with a sense of community:
Whenever “S” posts, whoever sees the post first, post right after with the username "Troll" (you will have to log out first); that will alert anyone from the Voicelessness menu, that “S” has been spotted, and replied to . Write only N/T ( no text) in the dialogue box. That way we are purposely ignoring her, but also being proactive about it. There will be satisfaction in giving a reply that can’t be responded to. That yes, the message is acknowledged, but we aren’t interested anymore. "S" has to get the message that she has worn out her welcome- many times.
If we stick together on this, we can make our point.
And for any bleeding hearts, (of which club I belong ), consider that we are doing her a favor. If she gets it, she can find a board elsewhere and start over. If she doesn’t that’s her problem. We can’t fix that.