Ok, it's clear to me now. Janet raised a boundary, Ami respected it, as far as she could tell.
~Laura
With respect,
Laura, how can it be clear to you, as you have stated that you were confused regarding the thread posts,
yet, despite this, you invited Ami into your Pastoral Care to give her support on a one-to-one basis in PM land.
What is clear, however, is that you are now enmeshed in that situation, and that your above statement is one of Enabling.
As the wise man on the board has been saying, of whom I discern and respect, enabling prevents healing.
With respect here is the truth .....
From Janets first post:
I decided to set a boundary, and told her that I no longer wanted to hear any details at all of the relattionship she is having. She agreed to respect my boundary....and then in the very next sentence, stomped all over it, by saying 'I respect what you are saying about ****. I just want to ask you WHY you think it is doomed--just your opinion' (and other questions, which I don't want to list here).
Then you misrepresented the PM in a public thread.
Now you are telling Leah what her feelings are.
All the while insisting that you have done nothing wrong....
This is what you say Ami : What I AM saying was Janet set a boundary and I ADHERED to it.
You did not adhere to it. Tell the truth Ami.