The only request I have is that is be a dialogue as though we were sitting in a circle, with a commitment to share time relatively equally. This is an invitation to anyone who has felt there was no point in posting, or who has not spoken much lately, and who would like to have a quiet SHARED dicussion, as in taking turns, with mutliple voices rather than only the familiar few.
I ask that it be respectful and kind and mature, and that the larger goal of rebuilding and maintaining a healthier community, with serious consideration to questions of dominance and quantity versus quality of sharing, be the topic.
They took pain seriously and responded to it with respect for its significance. But there was perspective. They often mention other people in their lives whom they love or are touched by; they were seldom the only subject of their own posts.
I've come to believe some people try to use support groups as a way to act out their own conflicts about their FOO or the relationship with the N. Transference. Projection.... whatever. And I believe also, that they need a different kind of help than a support group can provide. It's not an appropriate place to actually re-enact those conflicts or experiences.
What you wrote here has summed it up for me:
They took pain seriously and responded to it with respect for its significance. But there was perspective. They often mention other people in their lives whom they love or are touched by; they were seldom the only subject of their own posts.
I can just hear the cries of - "You can't tell me to just get over it!", etc, etc.
And I know, of course, that's not the suggestion at all...
but that's likely how it will be interpreted, imo.
Maybe I was expecting something different than a mirror of life on "the outside." I think I was expecting more of a sanctuary, a safe place where I could come to read the stories of other adult children, post some of mine, get a reality check, maybe read some things that were healing and would help me grow. It could be that my expectations were all out of whack. I don't know.
There are many, many good hearts here. Maybe I will see that feeling emerge again. Until that time, I will lurk and check my PMs. And I will probably get all pissed off at something someone's N mom said and post something in spite of myself.
Where I disagree with this, in light of the conflicts I've seen in my time here, is when "having a voice" is used to entitle someone to be mean, cruel, call names or label, and almost literally stand on a street corner shouting about how someone else here is making them a victim, hurting their feelings... in an attempt to gain sympathy and supporters. This is divisive in any community, anywhere, any time. And manipulative. Sure, it's because of abuse suffered before...
He claimed that there is no such thing as community until you have had your first conflict. No one is being real if they are trying to avoid conflict--and it is the handling of conflict that forges the community.
I get it..... Thru conflict we are learning effective and healthy ways of using our voices. We are learning what works and what doesn't! We are learning good communications skills....
Oops
I get it..... Thru conflict we are learning effective and healthy ways of using our voices. We are learning what works and what doesn't! We are learning good communications skills....
Oops
Hi folks,
Gosh, it's a bit too hot in the garden for me today, though I am not complaining, the sunshine is more than welcome after so much rain lately.
However, whilst sitting in the garden peacefully, listening to the birds and hearing children's laughter in the distance, I pondered awhile on what has sadly occurred here on the board today in a relatively short period of time -- seemingly all in an instant.
This is what I don't understand ...
Today: Chronology of Choice of Words – and the final outcome
A personal thread is created with the choice of the “ We “ statement.
The much discussed, and as I understand, recommended use of the “ I “ statement was not used.
Thereby, understandably, questions and responses of clarification will occur - as did happen.
A member posts that to question the creator of the thread - is 'absolutely out of order’ kind of thing -- directed at the two members.
One member then responds – highlighting the full context of her post.
The second member receives an acknowledgement response posting from the thread topic creator and all appears well, and in addition, and in conclusion, the member expresses words of encouragement and thanks, with blessings, for something that she learned from the thread topic creator.
The second member responds to the member who had chimed in with an admonishment -- and in doing so, merely expresses her feelings of being wrongly perceived.
Final Outcome:
The second member is informed (with notification to the board owner) on a separate new thread, that a boundary has been set, and that henceforth, she cannot post or make reference to the thread topic owner.
http://www.voicelessness.com/disc3//index.php?topic=8017.0 (http://www.voicelessness.com/disc3//index.php?topic=8017.0)
http://www.voicelessness.com/disc3//index.php?topic=8021.0 (http://www.voicelessness.com/disc3//index.php?topic=8021.0)
This is truly so sad to see here right now, today.
Am I missing something? I really don’t understand “why?” all of this had to be.
Truly, I am bewildered.
Love to ALL
Leah
Why? Are we seemingly devouring one another?
Edit in: By the way, this, my posting has no relation or bearing on a certain newish thread out on the board -- of which I have only just noticed, and read. Thank you, Leah.
Dear Amber
I think you brought up a profound point.
I think we are ALL playing out OLD dramas using each other. That and mainly that is what causes our fights.
I am glad you brought up this point, Amber. It is good to see the futility of replaying old patterns.
Ami
I would like for newcomers to have a sense of spaciousness. Of quiet welcome and patient openness. Receptivity.
This is an invitation to anyone who has felt there was no point in posting, or who has not spoken much lately, and who would like to have a quiet SHARED dicussion, as in taking turns, with mutliple voices rather than only the familiar few.
That, in reality, is the way ALL groups work, isn't it?
I don't think anyone here would leave a newcomer's post hang, without any response, though.
Lighter
Oh gosh, Lise....
I know it's just a difference in the way you & I are "built", but I simply can't distrust someone until they've given me reason to. I don't think that's fair to the person in question. I would state what you bolded as:
New people are "safe" for me, until I have evidence otherwise.
Yeah - I've gotten into some real pickles because of this tendency! But I simply can't walk around in my own skin comfortably, without this assumption that people are safe - until I know differently. And I'd be afraid that newbies could sense someone's wariness...
And I'd be afraid that newbies could sense someone's wariness...
I ask that it be respectful and kind and mature
Quote from: PhoenixRising on Today at 11:49:18 AM
And I'd be afraid that newbies could sense someone's wariness...
Quote from Gabben
This above is a statement that reveals control issues.
I'm sorry you feel that way.
Hi Lise,
If you'd like to discuss a conflict with Amber, would you mind starting a separate thread for it?
thanks,
Hops
People should not let bullies go ON and ON and ON and ON( 2 years)
PR -- Most of the times that you have posted to me on the board I feel nauseated when I read your posts
Thanks for telling me. Harassment is not permitted on the board. Let me know if it happens again, and you would like me to do something about it.
Best,
Richard
You agree, through your use of this forum, that you will not post any material which is false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing,
obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy
Your problem is not me,Amber , a voice in the computer.If you look inside ,Amber, you would do MUCHO better. Who do I remind you of ,in your life, Amber. Start there, no? Ami
In a healthy community, the rules as stated apply to all. There are no special dispensations, no free passes, for behavior that violates the rules. No matter who the people are or what their situation is.
To allow behavior in SOME that violates the rules of the board against hateful, abusive, and accusatory remarks, creates a hostile environment for the group as whole resulting in the self-selected silence of many. To allow the behavior repeatedly without comment, implies that it's acceptable. I don't believe this is fair.QuotePeople should not let bullies go ON and ON and ON and ON( 2 years)
Ami herself is guilty of bullying; of all the things she is accusing unnamed others of.
Thanks, Carolyn. Good reminder -- it's not 3-D group therapy, it's not a slumber party, and it's not a rumble! (Hopefully... :)) There are no tissues, no leather couches, and though he's present in case of emergency, I figure (that's my assumption) that Doc G's normal hands-offishness is because he'd like us to learn from stumbling through things together. Maybe I'm talking myself back into sticking around.
I hope this thread has been constructive overall. I hope it continues or pops up again whenever anyone wants to discuss: rallying, quantity vs. quality of posts, or dominance of the board by FFs (including moi).
I'd like to thank you in particular Carolyn for your observations about RALLYING. For me, it's one of the most destructive habits on the board...when people name-drop, or include others in their strategies, it feels very school-yardy, to me. (The schoolyard was NOT a nice place, in my case...). So-and-so likes ME, or So-and-so IS LIKE ME, etc. You Go Away, I only want to play with So-and-So today! OW.
I think it's healthier when we speak for ourselves, and don't subtly or otherwise use others as pieces. When we need to address or reference someone else because it furthers things or is a natural part of the flow, that makes sense. But sometimes I think people are manipulated with flattery, effusive praise (gushing), inclusion and exclusion. Some of that is discussed here: http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/mb.pl?FalseRepentance (http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/mb.pl?FalseRepentance)
Consider me a gusher. And I was trained to manipulate. And sometimes I exclude and include. Hello, Kettle. But I'd like to be more aware, so I don't "rally". Maybe the board in general can benefit from thinking about rallying too.
love,
Hops
Hops, I think that's an excellent idea because it provides a clear indication to others that two people are trying to work something out.
Just for the record: I don't feel I have anything to work out or through with Ami, but if she chooses to create this type of thread, I will consider responding.
I am well able to protect myself these days, so that's not the issue for me. It's not personal anymore.
What is personal, is when the rules don't apply equally to everyone.
So I felt I needed to say this for the benefit of those who are not able to say it or choose not to.
Let me know if it happens again, and you would like me to do something about it.
Best,
Richard
Thank you, Leah
Two of my board friends commented on your increased strength, so it IS noticable to others. I am really proud of you, Leah and proud to call you my friend. Shalom, Ami
I haven't read this entire thread, just the first posts and a few others. But I'll gladly chime in, and say why I was one of those who came through briefly and left fairly quickly: I came in during one of the former explosions (if you will), and had to ask myself: Do you really have this kind of time? To me, at that time, the bullying, deliberately (and I do believe many were deliberately) counterproductive posts simply overwhelmed the positive, thoughtful, meaningful ones. Conflict occurs at many levels, every day. I deal with it constantly. Addressing it productively gives a real feeling of accomplishment. But name calling isn't adult-level conflict, it's schoolyard bullying. One cannot use reason with a zealot, not matter what their cause, and especially if their cause is harming someone they believe they hate, or defending themselves against a slight, insult, etc., real or simply perceived. I do not believe the people here are so wounded they cannot stand to hear honest constructive criticism. I think sometimes it's just easier, especially in a society where such behavior is often valued, to lash out rather than step back.
(((((((((Leah)))))))))))
love,
ann
Finally, I have this stored in my favorites, from February'08 -- may or may not be heloful, again, posted with genuine good intention for the purpose of a Healthy Community. Leah x
What is meta-discussion?
You eagerly start reading a discussion supposedly about a subject of great interest to you, only to find that instead of being about the named subject, the discussion is full of posts arguing about how to discuss, what posts should be allowed on the forum, the attributes of a particular poster, complaints about others' posts and complaints about the discussion. Your heart sinks. You search in vain for any on-topic posts, then give up and never bother returning to that forum or discussion again.
That is meta-discussion, and it ruins many a good discussion. For that reason, more and more discussion forum owners are asking posters to avoid meta-discussion.
Let me explain why:
Meta-discussion is second-order discussion: discussion about the discussion – for instance, about its style, its participants, the forum in which it takes place, and so on – instead of about on-topic matters.
by Sarah Fitz-Claridge
Imagine a discussion forum whose subject is the book Atlas Shrugged, by Ayn Rand. Here are the possible kinds of discussion: http://www.fitz-claridge.com/node/18 (http://www.fitz-claridge.com/node/18)
At any rate, asking for validation is a more vulnerable position and I dont know if we can always admit, even to ourselves, that the sole purpose of our post is to get affirmation or validation.
I know, when someone has asked only for validation of their post - if I can, I will. If I can't - I need to restrain my "need" to offer advice or my own viewpoint.
A close relationship is built on mutual respect. Having a voice is knowing when to use it. If my goal is to simply exercise my voice whenever and however I want to--I will have had a "voice" but I may very well not have a relationship. I don't think that the FACT of metadiscussions on the board is the problem, but rather the HOW. What is the goal--what do I want out of the discussion? If I just want to express my voice, then how I do it will be less important than the fact that I got to say whatever I wanted, whenever I wanted. (I hear that goal being expressed on the board a lot)